Requirements for upgrade

I own the previous (full box, not an upgrade) version of Logic Studio (the version that came with Logic 8) and am thinking about uninstalling logic to clear up some space on my laptop and external HD. However in the future I plan to buy the next Logic studio upgrade for $199. Will I have to reinstall Logic 8 studio and the ~40 gigs of files that go along with it again before upgrading? or is the upgrade version self-contained/complete as a standalone product with all the ~35 gigs of supporting material?

The Upgrade box is exactly the same as the full boxed version except it requires an existing serial number to run.
So no need to re-install L8 prior to installing Logic 9 as ALL the content is on the discs of the upgrade version.
JG

Similar Messages

Requirements for upgradation from 4.7 to ECC 6.0

Hi Guru's,
Can anybody explain what are the steps required for upgradation from 4.7 to ECC 6.0, technically and functionally. If any body have documents regarding the same, please share.Full marks will be awarded.thanx in advance....

Hi
You have to aware of all related program like BDC's , Screens related errors and all dictionary related problems.
Some function modules may become obsolete, and some screens will change
abnd some new fields will be added in the new versions etc.
Also take care of SPAU and SPDD tcodes.
You should be able to know about Unicode concept in sap.
chk this
http://www.thespot4sap.com/upgrade_guide_v2.pdf#search=%22upGRADE%20STEPS%20-%20SAP%22
also chk these 2 notes in service.sap.com
Technical Upgrade is only a version upgrade without any functionality changes.
The objects that are needed to be upgraded are:
Includes
Function Groups / Function Modules
Programs / Reports
OSS Notes
SAP Repository Objects
SAP Data Dictionary Objects
Domains, Data Elements
Tables, Structures and Views
Module Pools, Sub Routine pools
BDC Programs
Print Programs
SAP Scripts, Screens
User Exits
You can refer to the below links for more information on technical upgrade:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/profile/2007/05/07/upgradeFROMR3TOmySAPERP-PARTII&
https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/profile/UPGRADEFROMR3TOmySAPERP-PARTIII
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/60/d6ba7bceda11d1953a0000e82de14a/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/2e/6d66647d9011d396b60000e82de14a/content.htm
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/5ac31178-0701-0010-469a-b4d7fa2721ca
Reward points if useful
Regards
Anji

Requirements for upgrading from LR3 to LR4

The processor requirements for LR4 reads "Multicore Intel processor with 64 bit support." The processor description in the iMac I bought in early 2009 reads "2.8 GHZ Intel Core 2 Duo." Will my processor handle LR4?
Thank you
Jim B

As mentioned above the d/load will be the current release whereas the disk version will be 4.0 and need updating.
There are many differences between Lr3 and 4 though including catalogs (Lr3 catalogs will have a copy made and upgraded) and processing (a new process version) which can alter image appearance of existing files. So don't update the process version on existing files before you have experimented - I do it only when reviewing a file if I feel I can work it better with the new version, not updating the whole lot at once!!

List of DVD require for Upgrade

Hi Techies
What are the list of software required for the upgarde from 4.7 to ECC 6 ,can u guide me the exact path from the SMP where i can download the software .
Thank You
Haroon

Hi,
Browse to http://service.sap.com/swdc --> Entry By Application Group --> SAP Application components
--> SAP ERP --> SAP ERP 6.0 --> Installation and Upgrade --> Select your Database
1. Upgrade Master
2. Upgrade Kernel
3. Upgrade Export
4. Database DVD
5. SAP Kernel Unicode - If planned for UnicodeConversion
6. Java components - If needed
Hope it helps
Regards
KT

Hardware requirements for upgrading to OS X 10.4

We have an iMac running OS X 10.2.8 and we wish to upgrade to OS X 10.4. The machine is running standalone at home. We do not have any firewire device. Can we still do the upgrade?

Hi Again wendy!
Here is some additional info.
Mac OS X Versions 10.1, 10.2, 10.3, and 10.4, are complete system upgrades that must be purchased.
The point upgrades, such as 10.1.x to 10.1.5 (Final) 10.2.x to 10.2.8 (Final), 10.3.x to 10.3.9 (Final), and 10.4.x to 10.4.8 (Pending), can be downloaded for free.
Tiger is available for purchase at The Apple Store (U.S.).
If you know what to look for, a Full Retail Version, of the Tiger Install DVD, can also be purchased rather inexpensively, at some online Apple retailers, Amazon, eBay, AppleRescue, FastMac, etc.
Be sure not to purchase grey, upgrade or machine specific CDs or DVDs.
The disc should look exactly like the image in the above links.
Additional info in these links.
Using OS X Install CDs/DVDs On Multiple Macs
What's A Computer Specific Mac OS X Release
Software Update, Upgrade: What's The Difference?
Once Tiger 10.4.x is installed, you can use
PPC 10.4.8 Combo Update, to upgrade to the current version.
Tiger System Requirements
Shop Carefully, Examine All Documentation, And Good Luck!
ali b

MS System Center Operations Manager 2010 Download required for Upgrade from SCOM 2007 R2 (Select)

We need the download of SCOM 2012 without Service Pack1.
Upgrade from SCOM 2007 R2 (select license) fails while upgrade check with error: Logs shows "At least one of the following applications is installed on this computer. Due
to incompatibility with System Center 2012 - Operations Manager, these applications must be uninstalled."
Upgrade was started from dos elevated prompt with modified parameters like this:
setup.exe /silent /upgrade
/AcceptEndUserLicenseAgreement:1
/UseLocalSystemDASAccount
/DataReaderUser:<domain\user>
/DataReaderPassword:<password>
Research in internet and we found another person with same issue, which reports that direct upgrade from SCOM 2007 R2 to SCOM 2012 SP1 is not possible but if upgrade is done over
SCOM 2012 to SCOM 2012 SP1 it succeeds.
Unfortunately, we don't find any downloads for the first release of System Center 2012 e.g. Operations Manager.
Everything shows Service Pack 1 or the newer R2.
Who can help?

Our “Recommended” rolling upgrade path looks like the following:
SCOM 2007R2 CU4+ > SCOM 2012 RTM UR2+ >
SCOM 2012 SP1 UR4+ > SCOM 2012 R2
Also you can refer below link
http://blogs.technet.com/b/kevinholman/archive/2014/01/20/do-i-need-a-specific-cumulative-update-release-ur-in-order-to-upgrade-to-scom-2012-or-2012-sp1-or-2012-r2.aspx
Please remember, if you see a post that helped you please click "Vote As Helpful" and if it answered your question, please click "Mark As Answer"
Mai Ali | My blog: Technical

Disk Space requirements for Upgrade to OS X Mountain Lion

Hi Everybody,
I have a MacBook Pro with a 500GB disk.
Thinking about upgrading to 10.8 but in the App Store the Customer Reviews are mixed leaning to negative.
In the last couple of weks I've been having a lot of negative experiences with Apple in specific this issue: https://discussions.apple.com/message/15394781#15394781.
I want to avoid having a negative experience if I decide to move forward with the upgrade.
Currently I have 47 GB free.
MacBook-Pro:~ carlos$ df -h
Filesystem                          Size   Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/disk0s2                       465Gi 418Gi   47Gi    90%    /
devfs                              182Ki 182Ki    0Bi   100%    /dev
map -hosts                           0Bi    0Bi    0Bi   100%    /net
map auto_home                        0Bi    0Bi    0Bi   100%    /home
localhost:/Vw8zTROleQK0lflXyH4laM 465Gi 465Gi    0Bi   100%    /Volumes/MobileBackups
MacBook-Pro:~ carlos$
Will that be enough for the upgrade?
Thanks in advance!

No, it isn't.
Currently I have 47 GB free.
MacBook-Pro:~ carlos$ df -h
Filesystem                          Size   Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/disk0s2                       465Gi 418Gi   47Gi    90%    /
devfs                              182Ki 182Ki    0Bi   100%    /dev
map -hosts                           0Bi    0Bi    0Bi   100%    /net
map auto_home                        0Bi    0Bi    0Bi   100%    /home
localhost:/Vw8zTROleQK0lflXyH4laM 465Gi 465Gi    0Bi   100%    /Volumes/MobileBackups
MacBook-Pro:~ carlos$
Will that be enough for the upgrade?

My PC (XP, 2 GHz Celeron, 768 M ram) does not meet the minimum requirements for upgrade to version 6, so how can I stop Firefox from nagging me to upgrade?

I would LIKE to install version 6, but since my machine (XP, 2 GHz Celeron, 768 M ram) does not meet the system requirements there is no reason to continue the annoying nag screens.

I would LIKE to install version 6, but since my machine (XP, 2 GHz Celeron, 768 M ram) does not meet the system requirements there is no reason to continue the annoying nag screens.

Is Solution Manager required for ECC 6.0 upgrade?

We will upgrade our system from 4.7 to ECC 6.0. Is Solution Manager a required tool in ECC 6.0? My understanding is Solution Manager has to be run on a different server, ie. we will have to buy a new server. We have a small SAP implementation with only FI & CO modules, so we are trying to cut our costs if we could. Can anybody share their experience? Thanks for any input.

In an Upgrade , Solution Manager is required for Upgrade Keys and downloading the support packs . Now a days to download the support packs you have to approve it in Solution Manager otherwise it won't show up in your download basket.
May be SAP can provide you the keys & approve the SPs ( they used to do that before ) , in that case it isn't required.
You can also manage your upgrade project in Solman . Sooner or later you need to install solution manager. it's a nice system.Many good features like central monitoring, early watch alert etc etc ...
Thanks
Prince Jose

I am trying to upgrade EPM 8.9(8.49.23) to EPM 9.1 (8.53.08). During dataconversion step the AE process finished succssfully in few seconds. When i see the log it says "There are no conversions to run for upgrade path PF89 (18028,10003)". Please let me kn

I am trying to upgrade EPM 8.9(8.49.23) to EPM 9.1 (8.53.08). During dataconversion step the AE process finished succssfully in few seconds. When i see the log it says "There are no conversions to run for upgrade path PF89 (18028,10003)". Please let me know why it didnt do any conversion. Am i missing something?

yes, that app engine didnt inserted any rows. So now when i tried to drill down i found that there was no data in the "new demo" database on table UPG_DATACONV. That is the reason for all this.
When i applied required for upgrade patch in demo it said couple of patch already exists so those update i skipped. Now when i check upd877654 has a step which imports the data in this table. my change assistant told that the update is already available in my demo so i skipped. Now i am not sure what to do.
I tried reimporting the data and running the analyzer again. But worried that there can be any issues due to this.

Steps for upgrading kernel (ABAP+JAVA)

Hi All,
Could you pls let me know the steps required for upgrading kernel (ABAPJAVA). For ABAP I know the steps but I am confused about (ABAPJAVA) Instance.Recently we faced issues regarding startup of java server after upgrading ABAP stack .
Regards,
Prashant

This question has been asked gazillion of times.... did you do a search before posting?.... obviously not.
Use the Search in the top-right side of the page. You'll be amazed with the amount of info available.
Regards
Juan

System Requirements for SAP Netweaver 2004 (BW 3.5)

Hi,
We have an SAP BW 3.0B system running at the moment and we are in the process of upgrading to SAP Netweaver 2004 (BW 3.5).
I'll like to know if there are any additional system requirements for upgrading the system to SAP Netweaver 2004 (BW 3.5). We do not intend to make use of the Java options for the meantime.
Any documentations will be appreciated.
Points to be awarded accordingly.
Regards,
Uche

Hi,
Pls visit https://service.sap.com/instguides and download the latest Upgrade guide.
Hope this is useful
Regards
Umesh

Hardware Requirements for a Windows Server 2012 Domain Controller.

Hi,
I have a secondary office with 10 users with a domain controller that has reached its end of life. We like to upgrade the current hardware to serve as a domain controller and potentially as an onsite file server that will sync with head office during
off peak business hours.
Any recommendations for a low cost yet reliable hardware for the above solution ?

Hi,
Thanks for your post.
I think you need to meet the requirement for upgrading to windows server 2012r2.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh994618.aspx#BKMK_SysReqs
And you could refer to the following article about windows server 2012r2 domain controller configuration
Building Your First Domain Controller on 2012 R2
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/22622.building-your-first-domain-controller-on-2012-r2.aspx
Regards.
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

I want to upgrade my 2008 Mac pro to the latest one, will it meet the requirement for the future Software that's coming out for the next four years?

I want to upgrade my 2008 Mac pro to the latest one, will it meet the requirement for the future Software that's coming out for the next four years?.

I'd wait. What can't you do that you need? You mean you want to buy a new model, then why not wait for an actual new one, not the two year old 5,1, when you need to and have outgrown.
Yours will run Mountain Lion. yours is 4 yrs old and still supported and has life left.

MacPro 2,1 Videocard Upgrade Requirements for Final Cut Pro X ?

I bought Final Cut Pro X in June, had no problem to install it on my MacPro 2,1 with processor
2 x 3 GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon, RAM 4 GB and Graphic Card and ATI Radeon X1900 XT 512 MB running under Mac OS Snow Leopard. Recently I upgraded RAM to 8 GB. After switching to Mac OS Lion in july it continued to run in an unchange manner, even if not totally satisfactory due to the known buggy behavior of FCP X reported by many users, but it was anyway as usable as when I installed it.
Yesterday I decided to update FCPX to version 10.0.01, and did so in recommended manner by first deleting version 10.0.0 to the trash and empty the trash can. When I was going to install the new version of FCPX, as recommended, from the "Purchased" department of Appstore, I was denied to do so due to this message: "We could not complete Your purchase - Your computer’s video card does not meet the minimum system requirements".
That´s it, and here I´m stocked in a situation not being able to use FCP X which I have payed 229 $ for, because Apple has taken the right from me to use this application anymore. I can understand that Apple give You good recommendations concerning "the requirements" for running an application, but I doubt it´s acceptable and fair of Apple denying/hindering me to buy the product anyway, or, as in this case of mine, to use a product I´ve already payed for. Fact is, that even if the recommended requirements in respect to my video card not is met for this application (FCPX), so far I´ve still been able to use and benefit from it despite my computers "substandard quality" for running FCP X.
So, now I´m feeling forced to invest in a new videocard as well, if I want to continue to use my bought license of FCP X...What card do I need?
I´m considering to buy the video card ATI Radeon HD 5770 1 GB - do You think this card is compatible with my MacPro 2,1 build, and will meet the requirements of Final Cut Pro X version 10.0.01?

I wonder if there's any reason why OpenCL couldn't be an optional processing preference?
That way folks who had computers which do not have OCL or other cards which don't meet the spec could at least function knowing that the renders would not be optimal - or maybe real time playback of non optimized media might not be possible. But at least they'd be able to function.
I'm sure OCL cant be necessary for General display purposes in a 2D environment like video editing.
To shut out someones system without warning in a 0.01 update seems a bit radical to me.

Requirements for upgrade

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for