Requirment in tpt and intercompany sales

Hi Friends,
You have worked in Third Party Sales & Intercompany billing? how did you configurate? dont explain steps, i need your real time experience, what are the things you have configurate, how its work?
Regards,
Martin

Hi there,
You might find this link very usefull.....real screen configurations....[SCM Expert on-line|http://www.scmexpertonline.com/archive/Volume_04_(2006)/Issue_01_(January_and_February)/V4I1A1.cfm?session=]
Let me know if it helped you !.
Thanks,
Alcides Fialho

Similar Messages

Consignment and Intercompany sales

Hi gurus,
I want to create a process where I can make consignment issue and consignment return as inter-company as the goods we are selling is maintained in the plant belong to another company code. I am using the same material and customer which we r using in the sand box for standard order and it is working fine without a problem with intercompany billing. Let me tell you that I have assigned the intercom billing type to my sale order and did all the relevant copying control. I want to make my process as order related billing as we are selling the goods in exhibition/trade fair and want to create issue order and billing to hand out the invoice to customer.
I get customer invoice but unable to get a intercompany bill at the billing due list and if I tried to create by VF01 than it does pick the payer of regular invoice rather than the intercompany payer.
Your help is appreciated

Hi there,
When you want Inter company billing doc, then you should use VF01 in the supplying plant. Not in the receiving plant.
Since the receivuing plant bills the customer, you will get the trade invoice rather than intercompany invoice.
Regards,
Sivanand

Intercompany sales and stock transfer enhancement at billing level

Dear Gurus ,
Business requirement is to process intercompany sales and stock transfer for both divisions PB & RB, but in standard SAP we can assign only one division in the configuration. So need development to determine division on the basis of material division and not from configuration.
What is the ehancement we can use for the same ? To determine division from the material master at the time of intercompany invoice .
Note : We are not using common division concept .....here.
Looking for your inputs ....
Thanks and regards
Venkat

HI Garima ,
Plz check the following steps
CONFIGURATION SETTINGS
Assign Delivery Plant of the supplying company code to Sales Org + Distribution channel of the Ordering company code in the Enterprise Structure.
DEFINE ORDER TYPES FOR INTERCOMPNY BILLING:
Menu path: IMG/ SD/Billing/Intercompany Billing/Define Order Types for Intercompany billing
Assign Organizational units by Plant:
Menu Path: IMG/ SD/Billing/Intercompany Billing/Assign Organizational units by Plant.
Define Internal Customer Number By Sales Organization:
Menu Path: IMG/ SD / Billing/ Intercompany Billing/ Define Internal Customer Number By Sales Organization:
Creating / Showing Ordering Sales Organization as Internal Customer for Supplying Company code:
Transaction Code: XD01
The ordering sales organization is represented as Internal customer of Supplying company code.
We need to create customer master in Account Group - Sold to Party and maintain minimum required financial & Sales Area data.
This internal customer number has to be assigned to the ordering sales organization. Hence, the system automatically picks up this Internal customer number whenever there is Intercompany billing.
In the above mention configuration steps you are missing the second step in your confirguration 1.e the reason your getting that error
Best regards
Venkat

Intercompany sales and sales process exc Duty for Netherlands and Belgium

Can anyone explain me the sales and intercompany sales process where materials are excise Duty relevant for Netherlands and Belgium ? That means sales is done via the Netherlands for Netherlands and Belgium ? How are the different tax rates configured for the different countries ?

HI Garima ,
Plz check the following steps
CONFIGURATION SETTINGS
Assign Delivery Plant of the supplying company code to Sales Org + Distribution channel of the Ordering company code in the Enterprise Structure.
DEFINE ORDER TYPES FOR INTERCOMPNY BILLING:
Menu path: IMG/ SD/Billing/Intercompany Billing/Define Order Types for Intercompany billing
Assign Organizational units by Plant:
Menu Path: IMG/ SD/Billing/Intercompany Billing/Assign Organizational units by Plant.
Define Internal Customer Number By Sales Organization:
Menu Path: IMG/ SD / Billing/ Intercompany Billing/ Define Internal Customer Number By Sales Organization:
Creating / Showing Ordering Sales Organization as Internal Customer for Supplying Company code:
Transaction Code: XD01
The ordering sales organization is represented as Internal customer of Supplying company code.
We need to create customer master in Account Group - Sold to Party and maintain minimum required financial & Sales Area data.
This internal customer number has to be assigned to the ordering sales organization. Hence, the system automatically picks up this Internal customer number whenever there is Intercompany billing.
In the above mention configuration steps you are missing the second step in your confirguration 1.e the reason your getting that error
Best regards
Venkat

Intercompany Sales settings

Hi,
Can anyone please tell me in brief the necessary and mandatory settings required in case of Intercompany Sales Scenario?
I checked few threads but couldn't get a satisfactory answer.

Hi christino,
INTER COMPANY BILLING
Definition:
A company arranges direct delivery of the goods to the customer from the stocks of another company belonging to the same corporate group.
To put in simple terms,
Company code A orders goods through its sales organization A from Plant B belonging to Company code B.
It is imperative that both Plants A & B should have the material. In other words, the material is created for both the Plants A & B + their respective storage locations.
Sales Organizations and Plants are uniquely assigned to Company codes. It is not possible to assign either a plant or a sales organization to more than one company code.
Sales organizations and plants assigned to each other need not belong to the same company code.
In other terms,
a plant belonging to Company code A & assigned to Sales Organization A can also be assigned to Sales Organization B of Company Code B.
This enables cross company sales.
PARTIES INVOLVED
1) End Customer 2) Ordering Company code 3) Supplying Company Code.
CONFIGURATION SETTINGS
Assign Delivery Plant of the supplying company code to Sales Org + Distribution channel of the Ordering company code in the Enterprise Structure.
DEFINE ORDER TYPES FOR INTERCOMPNY BILLING:
Menu path: IMG/ SD/Billing/Intercompany Billing/Define Order Types for Intercompany billing
Assign Organizational units by Plant:
Menu Path: IMG/ SD/Billing/Intercompany Billing/Assign Organizational units by Plant.
Define Internal Customer Number By Sales Organization:
Menu Path: IMG/ SD / Billing/ Intercompany Billing/ Define Internal Customer Number By Sales Organization:
Creating / Showing Ordering Sales Organization as Internal Customer for Supplying Company code:
Transaction Code: XD01
The ordering sales organization is represented as Internal customer of Supplying company code.
We need to create customer master in Account Group - Sold to Party and maintain minimum required financial & Sales Area data.
This internal customer number has to be assigned to the ordering sales organization. Hence, the system automatically picks up this Internal customer number whenever there is Intercompany billing.
PRICING:
We need to maintain two pricing procedures RVAA01 & ICAA01. Pricing procedure RVAA01 represents condition type PR00 & any other discounts or surcharges that are meant for end customer.
We assign Pricing procedure RVAA01 to combination of Sales area (Of Ordering company code) + Customer Pricing Procedure + Document Pricing Procedure of Sales document type.
This pricing Procedure (RVAA01) is determined both at Sales Order level & Billing processing for the end customer. We maintain PR00 condition type to represent the ordering company code's price to the end customer.
Condition records for PR00 are maintained using organizational elements of Ordering company code, end customer & the Material.
Eg: Sales Org. of Ordering company code + End customer + Material.
We also need to maintain PI01 condition type to represent costs to Ordering company code (in other words revenue to supplying company code). It is statistical condition type & meant for information purpose only.
Condition records for PI01 are created with the following key combination:
Ordering sales Org + Supplying Plant + Material
Pricing Procedure ICAA01is determined at Intercompany billing processing level.
Pricing Procedure ICAA01 - Pricing Procedure for Inter company billing is assigned to the combination of:Sales Area (of supplying company code) + Document pricing Procedure of Billing document type IV + Customer Pricing Procedure of the Internal customer.
Pricing Procedure ICAA01 has condition type IV01 that represents revenues for Supplying company code in the intercompany billing.
PR00 condition type also appears in Intercompany billing document. It is for information purposes only and does not have bearing on the value of the document.
PI01 represented under pricing procedure RVAA01 is reference condition type for IV01 and the same is defined in the condition type IV01. Due to this these two condition types represent same value.
The condition type IV01 in intercompany billing document represents revenue to the Supplying Company. But its corresponding condition type PI01 in the billing document to the end customer is shown as a statistical item meant for information purposes.
Condition Type VPRS in the intercompany-billing document indicates cost to the supplying company code.
The use of two different condition types in Intercompany billing is necessary to ensure that data is transmitted correctly to the financial statement (Component CO-PA).
Regds,
Rupali

Intercompany sales without the EDI piece?

Hi all,
I am looking into setting up and intercompany sales process for my client. It is a straightforward process whereby product will be sold out of one company code (A), and delivered out of a plant that is in another company code (B). I have already configured the intercompany invoice to be created from the company code B vendor to the selling company code, A, and this is working great. My question is... do I need to configure the EDI piece to create the invoice receipt within company code A? I seem to remember at a previous client that we did intercompany sales without this piece, but I wasn't close enough to it to remember the details. Any thoughts/comments would be greatly appreciated.

Hi Barry,
If you guys are using EDI for acknowledging the reciepts of STO, sending ASN's etc. then I would say to set up the EDI for the invoice as well, if not forget about it.
It should not impact your outcome.
We do not use EDI for the Intercompany operations.
Mostly Confirmations through Email.
Thanks
Murtuza

Difference between intercompany sales and STO (inter)?

HI Experts
Can any one tell me what is the difference between between intercompany sales and STO(inter)?
LNaidu

hi..
Intercompany sales trans.
the customer orders stock from the sales org (3001)..that belongs to comp code 3000...the Sales org 3001 then creates the sales order and indicates the delivering plant as a plant that belongs to different company code i.e. 1000..
The sales org 3001 then invoices the customer for material purchased..the system automatically creates the inter-compnay billing doc at the same time as the customer's billing doc is created,,,This inter-compnay invoic ius sent from the delivering plant to selling sales org..
Two billing doc..1. standard customer billing doc that is sent from the sales org to the customer.
2. inter-compnay doc that is sent from delivering plant ot sales org..
Inter compnay STO..
comp code 3000 has plant 3000 creates purchase order to purchse stock from plant 1000 based in comp code 1000..
the stock is delivered to plant 3000. comp code 1000 then creates an inter compnay invoice and bills compnay code 3000 for the stock...
hope it works..
Thanks

Intercompany sales and intra company sales

Hi gurus,
please tell me what is intercompany sales and what is intra company sales?
and what is the difference between intercompany sales and intra company sales?

Hi,
please go through below links
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/dd/5614e7545a11d1a7020000e829fd11/frameset.htm
Kapil

Intercompany sales and third party sales

Dear folks
can any one of you tell me the process or
what are the steps in intercompany sales and
third party sales on very very high priority
regards
ramarao

Hi
Steps
Intercompany Sales
Sales Order(OR)
Delivery Document(LF) movement type(601)
Invoice(F2) with reference to Delivery Document
Intercompany Invoice( IV ) with reference to Delivery Document
Third Party Orders
Sales Order(OR) Item category (TAS)
Purchase Order(NB) with reference to purchase requsition
MIGO movement type 101 with reference to purchase Order
MIRO with reference to Purchase Order
Invoice(F2) with reference to sales order
ramesh

Credit Memo Request for intercompany sales process

Hi Experts
I try to find SAP notes regardsing the credit memo request for intercompany related issue but I can
not find any nates. The customer return the goods with 2 different
scenario :-
-Return with credit
-Return with replacement.
Can anybody explain how this 2 scenario perform in the SAP
intercompany sales process. Appreciate for your help. Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Jennie Tan

Already answered
Enter IG (internal credit memo) as the billing type for intercompany
billing for order type RE.
Cust-Sales/distrib-Transactions-Billing-Intercompany billing-Order types
Intercompany billing always refers to a delivery
Processing flow will be:
1. Create returns request invoice receipt (with or w/out reference)
2. Create returns delivery and goods receipt
3. Create credit memo invoice receipt for customer for 1.
4. Create internal credit memo for 2.
Therefore you must make the following entries in the document flow
for billing documents:
Target BillType        DlvType              ItemCat
a)    IG                  LR
b)    IG                  LR                    REN
Parameters for entries:
For a) Copying requirement: 14 Dlv.-rel.header IV
      Copy item no.: x (Check and decide yourself)
For b)Copying requirement: 15 Dlv.rel. item IV
      Data VBRK/VBRP      : 1 Inv.split (sample)
      Billing quantity    : B
      Qty/itm val.pos/neg : +
      Pricing type        : G
Also, refer following SAP Notes
13160 - Returns with intercompany billing
24756 - Credit memo requests with inter-company billing
652007 - Reporting internal credit memos on arrival side
11980 - Intercompany billing with order-related billing document
164074 - Problems for internal invoices on returns
Thanks & Regards
JP

How to avoid special stock indicator for intercompany sales transitions.

Hi Friends
I have an issue Intercompany sales .if I enter intercompany plant(Delivering plant) in the sales order system is taking special stock indicator and looking for sales order stock.
If I enter company code plant for sales from unrestricted stock, system is not taking special stock indicator.
Please advice how to avoid special stock indicator for intercompany sales transitions.
Thanks in advance.
SRK

Ravi,
Special stock is generally determined by the MRP strategy group in the material master of the plant against which you place your order. The strateg(ies) contained in the strategy group will determine the SO requirements type, which will in turn determine whether or not the order is 'account assigned' (special stock).
It is normal to only have one strategy contained in a strategy group. However (and I seldom recommend this) SAP will support multiple strategies within one strategy group. In this case, you could have both MTS and MTO orders against the same plant/material, by manually altering the requirements type in the sales order. This scenario is usually difficult for a planner, and involves additional manual attention to make everything work.
I suggest that your first avenue is to change the Strategy group in the material master of the delivering plant to one that supports MTS. This has a big impact in Controlling and in Production Planning, so ensure that all affected functional groups are aware of what you are doing, and of the resulting changes that they will experience. The transition from MTO to MTS must be carefully controlled.
If you are not a PP expert, I suggest you consult with your local PP expert before embarking on this change.
Best Regards,
DB49

ACCOUNT DETERMINATION "INTERCOMPANY SALES &3RD PARTY SALES" -kishore,AK ,

HI ,
   Rajesh , Kishore , AK ,
      well 2day i had   client interview , he was very much stressing on " ACCOUNT DETERMINATION " process in intercompany sales , both in ordering comapny and delvering plant .
       At the same time account determination for 3rd party sales . well got some docs had brief capsule study , still stuck up .
   can u pl throw come clarity .
Regards,
jerry

Dear Jerry
Inter-Company Scenario in SAP is quite different than its literal meaning.
Inter-Company means, customer gives order to company code A (PlantA), but Plant A is not having stock, so it passes on to Plant B(CoCd B).So in Sales order of A you enter Plant B.
So now goods are delivered by Plant B to Customer and commercial invoice for customer is from CoCd A.
Cocd B just gives inter company invoice.
Now Comming to account determination , it totally depends on pricing procedure as account keys are there. There is not much difference from standard scenario, but you can have seperate G/L Accounts
If you are talking about <b>sales between different company codes</b>, then this can be handled having different sales document and thus different pricing procedure, you can ask customer , what is there requirement. and can say that it is like normal sales cycle only
<b>Third-Party Processing</b>
1) two standard process provided by SAP in the frames of the third-party processing:
a) pure third-party process: X creates the sales order, automatically purchase requision and later a purchase order will be created at the vendor. Then the vendor sends the goods directly to your customer and send the invoice to X. The company X creates the invoice to the customer Y.
b) individual purchase order: the same process, but the vendor sends the goods not to the customer directly, but first to X, and then the company X delivers the goods to the customer Y. The invoice is coming from Z to X (transaction MIRO), and then X creates invoice to Y.
you can refer the accounting document to get Idea of account determination
Regards
Jitesh

Intercompany Sales in Planning

Hi,
Has anyone implemented planning on Intercompany activity in Planning. I have come up with 2 approaches and see some cons with both the issues.
I am hoping someone has a better approach than the 2 listed below.
Thanks
-NS
Approach 1 : Each company code plans for its intercompany activity. Trading partner is used as a tag to denote intercompany activity. Move the data to BCS towards the end of planning cylce, execute elimination. BCS will list all the elimination errors.
Problem : This may produce a huge reconciling activity towards the end of the cycle.
Approach 2 : Each company code plans for its intercompany activity. Trading partner as a tag to denote intercompany activity. Planning function creates the reverse entry in the partner company (use a different Planning item to avoid locking problems. This planning item should not be allowed for user entry).
Problem : The reverse entry in the partner company would affect its Finanacial statements

Hello,
I have implemented intercompnay elimination / consolidation several times in BCS and also in BPS.
You have written a short question, which requires a very detailled answer. This is impossible here, so I try to give some comments, hope it helps.
You need to have trading partner e. g. in case that data are delivered by SAP EC-CS or FI. In this case company and trading partner is the standard for intercompany data. Thats normally a very good base for planning as well. Lets say company A and B do have intercopany sales.
The first option is to plan for company A (IC sales) and then to load the same data for company B (IC costs). In this case you dont have any differences between IC sales and costs because: IC costs = IC sales (automatically). But normally company B wants to make their own cost planning and they dont want automatically created costs. Thats possibly the beginn of a very long discussion
But if you plan in company A independant sales and for B independant costs you can have differences (IC costs <> IC sales). This can be an advantage to make wrong planning transparent to all involved companies and will create reconciliation effort.
The target in the end of the day is: IC sales = IC costs, which is the target of "elimination".
you have written: " Each company code plans for its intercompany activity". Yes, thats the normal thing, but for sure in the end of day you will have differences (sales <> costs). I dont see a disadvantage in case that you have huge reconciliation processes: As long as this is reasonable it makes clear why and where unco-ordinated or wrong planning is comming from! If you have to much to reconcile it is an indicator for not coordinated planning processes.
You have written "move data to BCS to eliminate". To eliminate, this can be done at the end when plannung is done for all companies! To realise this elimination technically is quite simple in most cases (not all). So I would say it is to much effort to plan in BPS to eliminate in BCS. In this case BPS can eliminate in BPS as well. But this depend on the elimation rules: If you have to much it could make sence to plan in BPS and eliminate in BCS to avoid double maintnance of elimination rules and especially chart of account and so on. But it can be very complex in case that you have "Intra-sales" AND "inter-sales", so lets say: sales between business divisions and sales between companies. Dont know wether you have to do that? But normally elimination in BCS depend on law but elimination in BPS depend on companies rules, which means: The rules, which are maintained in BCS are normally very strong because of law. But the rules, which can be used for planning are normally quite simple and dont have to much impact from law but from planning responsibility. Thats the reason why I think you dont need to move data to BCS. You sould discuss this possibilities with your business team and ask for a decission.
The fundamental question is to use BPS or BCS? This must be clear before planning. A lot of companies dont use BCS for elimination of planning data, they use BPS for elimination of planning data and BCS to eliminate actuals.
So whenever it is possible I would like to recommend your second approach: "Planning function creates the reverse entry in the partner company (use a different Planning item to avoid locking problems. This planning item should not be allowed for user entry)."
Have a nice day
Eckhard Lewin

Intercompany sales/billing - trading partner functionality

Hi Guys,
I understand the theory of trading partner.
But if anyone can give me an example (accounting entries) of trading partner in intercompany sales/billing..that would be very helpful.
Thanks and Regards,
MS

Hi Roman,
As you said, trading partner functionality in SAP is an excellent tool for inter-company transactions and elimination of intercompany payables and receivables for consolidation purposes.
1. The pieces of configuration / master data maintenance you need are:
a. SPRO -> SAP Reference IMG (F5) -> Enterprise Structure -> Definition -> Financial Accounting -> Define Company (OX15)
b. SPRO -> SAP Reference IMG (F5) -> Enterprise Structure -> Assignment -> Financial Accounting -> Assign company code to company (OX16)
c. SPRO -> SAP Reference IMG (F5) -> Financial Accounting -> Financial Accounting Global Settings -> Document -> Document Header -> Define Document Types (OBA7) - Here, for document types you want to use for inter-company postings, you may want to check the checkboxes 'Inter-company postgs' and/or 'Enter trading partner'. Read the SAP Help Documentation on these fields (press F1 when on the field).
d. Create your sister concerns as customers and vendors (preferably under an account group different from your external customers/vendors) and specify the Company you have created in (a) above in the Trading Partner field of Control data tab.
e. Enter Trading Partner in relevant G/L accounts (FS00) in Type/Description tab -> 'Consolidation data in chart of accounts' section.
f. Consider substitution rules (OBBH) for substituting Trading Partner in required transactions.
2. Things to consider for implementing the Trading Partner functionality for entities already performing day to day transactions on SAP.
I am not pretty sure about this, but I guess it is better to go for the change after you end a fiscal year and from the beginning of the next.
3. I think it is better to enable this functionality for everyone on SAP at once.
Good luck!
Srikanth

Intercompany sales process

Dear ALL SD Guru,
I am doing the intercompany sales process . For the same task i have created the sales order , delivery and finally create the invoice for the customer . After that when i am trying to create the intercompany invoice , system is showing me error " Sales organization is not defined" How ever i have done all the following required setting related to create the intercompany invoice in the system.
1- Assign the supplying company code sales area to deliverying plant.
2 Create one internal customer with supplying comany code and same sales area .
3 Assign internal customer to ordering sales organization
4 Assgn default intercompany billing document type (IV) to order type (OR)
5 I have extended the articles by supplying company code sales area
6 maintain the copy control in bet Or & IV
Is there any other setting required to execute this process , Please tell me
Waiting your response
Abhi

Hi,
see below link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/dd/5614e7545a11d1a7020000e829fd11/frameset.htm
http://www.sap-basis-abap.com/sd/configuring-intercompany-billing.htm
Kapil

Requirment in tpt and intercompany sales

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for