Reschedulig Date Problem in Planning Run

Hello All,
Need Clarification..
The Scenario:
The Requirement date (OrdRes) is 13.02.2009, The planned Order generated is on 13.02.2009.
Now the OrdRes Date Changed Manually to 27.01.2009.
After Background MRP Run, in MD04 against the planned order, the Rescheduling date proposed is 27.01.2009 and exception message is 30 ( Plan process according to schedule).
System is Proposing the date, but not actually shifting the planned order.
If I re-run the MRP Manually, the Rescheduling is happening.
What at first place the rescheduling not happened? after manual MRP run the rescheduling happening?
P.N:
1. The Planned Order is not Firmed
2. The Planning Parameters are same for Background Run and Manual one.
Your inputs are highly appreciated..
Regards,
Siva

Hi Siva Kumar,
Once u change the delivery date (order rervation of Header), system will create planning file entry for Child materail and set Exception message 30 of child planned order
When u run the MRP next, child material should be included in the Planning Run and rescheduling should be happened .
This is what my finidings, Please check.
Pradeep

Similar Messages

Dates problem in MRP Run

Hello
i m running mrp using zpp_md50 is the zprogramme for running the mrp for all the line items in one sales order, after running the MRP, whatever the pur. req. generated we will convert it to PO, but client need one release statergy here so that they can take the assurance from the suppling plant that whatever the date mrp run showing is that plant is really able to supply the goods on that date or not.
1) if suppling plant is not able to send the goods on the requested date in that case receving plant should be able do the amendment (change) in dates in their panning so that they can give the new delivery date to the customer?how to achive this?
2) They also want when we run the MRP, system has to consider the unrestricted stock present for the sales order line item,but without giving the sales order ref. using 412e to sales order.cause their r huge no of line item in sales order.
3) my client is not able to achive the customer date so it is very imp to do the amendment in mrp dates cause the dependacy is on the supplying plant & the suppling plant can produse only taking material grades of the same item at a time & it is not possible for suppling plant to produce as per the delivery date of the order.so the date in master ie. in house production date maintain is not really going to be follow, as the plant is critical, plz suggest some solutions for this also?
Regards
Nishj.

Nishj,
Wow. Substantial requirements. Let me see how many of these I can help you with.
i m running mrp using zpp_md50
Please understand that that program is custom to your system. It will be hard for us to comment on it's workings.
they can take the assurance from the suppling plant
It seems that you are selling the product from one plant but manufacturing in another
if suppling plant is not able to send the goods on the requested date in that case receving plant should be able do the amendment (change) in dates in their panning so that they can give the new delivery date to the customer?
This is standard in SAP. Basically, the suppying plant will create a supply element (production order, process order, perhaps in conjunction with a Stock Transport order) to move the parts to the selling plant. Once this element is in place, someone from Sales or another appropriate functional group will re-ATP the sales order. The sales order will then re-confirm against the new, more accurate dates.
They also want when we run the MRP, system has to consider the unrestricted stock present for the sales order line item,but without giving the sales order ref.
This can be achieved easily, by not using a MTO strategy. If you use strategy 40, Sales orders ATP, and all MRP calculations, will make use of all unrestricted stock. If there then is NO sales order stock, then this means that ALL stock is included. Just avoid any MTO strategies throughout your BOM.
There is no standard SAP functionality that will include Sales order stock and unrestricted stock simultaneously for the same part for the same requirement.
my client is not able to achive the customer date so it is very imp to do the amendment in mrp dates....
I am not sure what you are asking for here. You have stated the solution: The supplying plant does their research, and they then create a supply element with the realistic dates. The Sales order ATP check will then re-confirm to those dates. MRP will also run using those modified dates.
Rgds,
DB49

Problem loading data to Hyperion Planning app. from Oracle EBS using ERPi

I'm using ERPi to load data to Planning application from EBS.
I have configured Source and Target, created import formats, location, data load rules etc.
When I'm running data load rule it is showing that data is imported and exported sucessfully. I can see data in the right format in data load workbench. ODI shows process completed sucessfully. But still there is no data loaded in Planning.
Even AIF_HS_BALANCES staging view in ERPi repository shows correct data.
Can some one tell me what could be the problem.
Or where I can see logs for the data load step for Planning.
ODI operater logs are not very clear to me. Same for log tables in ODI work repository.

Hi Tony
Apologies for the delay (my email spammed the notification that you had replied, helpful!!). When you say that you have done it but discourage accessing the tables directly how did you achieve this? Were you just careful which data intersections your selected from the tables (e.g. always base level data so it is stored not calculated)?
I have used the HFM relational tables a couple of times to make use of the metadata that they contain but not tried to get data before.
Regards
Stuart

Problems with HowTo "Creation of BI Master Data in Integrated Planning...)

Hi,
one of our customers need a planning application in which he can create master data for different attributes, insert some key figures for this attributes and changes already planned key figured.
For the last two point I've already found a working solution, the first point (creating of masterdata in web template) is still a problem. After a little search, I found a howto-guide "Creation of BI Master Data in Integrated Planning (IP) through Web Layouts", in which the necessary steps are described, how to do this (please see following link: http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/607193d5-cdd5-2b10-c699-8ff04c3124f6)
Does anyone of you know this guide and was able to build a working solution?
I have different questions, maybe you could help me:
- what kind of variable is he using?
- do I need a DataProvider in Web Template?
- how do I get the connection to the used variable in the button group?
Thanks for your help.
Regards
Tim

Hi Timo,
you require two howtos to implement the solution.
First, please take a look at the first document:
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/10d2b273-0e12-2c10-fab3-a34bde559f92?QuickLink=index&…
In chapter 3 you see the prerequisites (note 1101726 and notes 1384495, 1387004 and 136772). By this, you change the system behaviour, not to check if the new inserted master data is valid (it can't be valid, because the entries are new!)
And after this please implement the solution from the how to.
Furthermore you can take a look at this how to, which might help you too:
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/607193d5-cdd5-2b10-c699-8ff04c3124f6?QuickLink=index&…
Even if my first post is a bit old, my customer still uses this solution, at the moment we are on 7.3 sp06, so it is working in newer releases too.
Hope this helps.
Regards
Tim

Run date problem in F110 - automatic payment program

Hi.
I am trying to run the automatic payment program in F110. I am facing the problem with the run date in this transaction. System is not giving me any error if i give the run date as today's date or future date.
But in run date if i give previous date system is not executing the automatic payment program.
Eg: Inovice posted on 01.01.2012. It becomes due on 01.01.2012. I gave run date as today's date 04.01.2012 or future date the system is executing correctly picking all invoices. But if i give the run date as previous to the current date i.e., 02.01.2012 or 03.01.2012 then system is not executing this transaction.
This problem is coming for all company codes. So if there is any setting for restricting run date request you to help me in this regard where can i do such setting.
Regards,
Padmavathi

Hi.
My problem is solved.
Actually client is entering the documents with posting date for earlier months whereas he has entered the documents this month.
Therefore system is not picking the invoices in F110 - automatic payment program.
Actually the run date entered is getting copied to the parameters entered i.e., posting date and documents entered upto date.
Documents are entered in the system this month with posting dates of previous months. Therefore if i give the run date as this month date the run date is getting copied to doc entered upto date in the parameters tab as this month date. So only system is not picking invoices since invoices are entered in the system this month only.
Now we changed the date for doc entered upto with previous month date and system is picking the invoices.
Thanks a lot for your help.
Regards,
Padmavathi

Problem in getting data in SNP Planning Area Data Source

Hi All,
Problem Statement: To fetch data from SNP Planning Area for reporting in SAP BW.
Approach: Followed the standard SAP Help Document. Link:http://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm40/helpdata/en/e0/9088392b385f6be10000000a11402f/content.htm
First Step: To create a DataSource on the Planning Area (Z9ASNP02) and Aggregate(9AMALO).
For that
Go to SAP Easy Access>Click on /SAPAPO/MSDP_ADMIN/ you are on S&DP Administration>Select the planning Area Z9ASNP02 double click on it
You are on Change Planning Area Screen>Go to Extras left click>DP/SNP Data Extraction Tool-->Click on Generate Data Source, Provide the
Data Source Name & Select the Aggregate 9AMALO and click on continue. Data Source is generated.
But now when i go for Test Data Source-->Extractor Checker Screen and then providing the version 000 and then when i click on extraction Button
It gives a Message "0 data records selected".
Thanks in Advance,
rahul

Hi Somnath,
Please correct me if my understanding is wrong; you are saying that, we cannot extract data from order series keyfigures. In that case how many key figures you maintain for time series, performance miight come down for planning area if you maintain huge no of keyfigures.
Is there any way to extract data from Order series Planning area?
Thanks & Regards,
Jagadeesh.

Error occurred during CTM planning run

Hi folks,
Appreciate your co-operations!
I am facing the problem while running the CTM with the profile DEMO2.
CTM Planning Run gives one error and alert.
Error: Error occurred during CTM planning run
Technical Data
Message type__________ A (Cancel)
Message class_________ /SAPAPO/CTM1 (CTM: Messgaes)
Message number________ 401
Problem class_________ 1 (very important)
Number________________ 1
Environment Information
CTM Action____________ G
Message type__________ A
Alert: Internal error has occurred (<!> Segmentation fault)
Technical Data
Message type__________ E (Error)
Message class_________ /SAPAPO/CTM1 (CTM: Messgaes)
Message number________ 571
Message variable 1____ <!> Segmentation fault
Number________________ 1
Environment Information
CTM Action____________ G
Message type__________ C
Log file display
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(1363) 'SuperVisor' => Commandline : 4 respected parameters ...
Args:
m0001006
sapgw04
28812935
IDX=1
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(645) 'SuperVisor' * SAP APO CTM Engine [CTM/ctmsvr]
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(646) 'SuperVisor' * Copyright u00A9 SAP AG 1993-2009
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(647) 'SuperVisor' *
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(648) 'SuperVisor' * Version : 7.0_REL SP05, 407661, Nov 25 2009 22:59:47
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(649) 'SuperVisor' * Platform : ntamd64/x64
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(650) 'SuperVisor' * Interface : 2.0
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(651) 'SuperVisor' * Build date : Nov 25 2009 22:59:47 [1259186387]
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(652) 'SuperVisor' * Build machine : PWDFM163
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(653) 'SuperVisor' * Latest change : 407661
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(654) 'SuperVisor' * NW release : 7100.0.3300.0
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(655) 'SuperVisor' * Perforce branch: 7.0_REL
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(656) 'SuperVisor' *
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(676) 'SuperVisor' * Hostname : m0001006
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(677) 'SuperVisor' * OS version : 5.2.3790 (WinServer2003, NTAMD64) SP2.0 (Service Pack 2), SERVER ENTERPRISE TERMINAL SINGLEUSERTS
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(678) 'SuperVisor' * PID : 6768
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(683) 'SuperVisor' * CWD : D:\usr\sap\SC6\DVEBMGS04\log
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(684) 'SuperVisor' *
 04:37:59 core_sysinfo.cpp(453) 'SuperVisor' * free disk space: 190433 MB
 04:37:59 core_sysinfo.cpp(454) 'SuperVisor' *
 04:37:59 core_sysinfo.cpp(409) 'SuperVisor' * Memory information:
 04:37:59 core_sysinfo.cpp(409) 'SuperVisor' * physical memory: 10238 MB total, 6511 MB available [63% free]
 04:37:59 core_sysinfo.cpp(409) 'SuperVisor' * page file : 73212 MB total, 60889 MB available [83% free]
 04:37:59 core_sysinfo.cpp(409) 'SuperVisor' * virtual memory : 8388607 MB total, 8388499 MB available [99% free]
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(693) 'SuperVisor' *
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(783) 'SuperVisor' * running in invoke mode
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(871) 'MsgMgr' <RFC> RfcPing(RFC_HANDLE=1) received in thread#6912
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(692) 'MsgMgr' <RfcConnection> using function module 'RCCF_COMM_PARAM_SET' for sending of parameters/options
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(703) 'MsgMgr' <RfcConnection> using function module 'RCCF_COMM_PARAM_GET' for receiving of parameters/options
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(712) 'MsgMgr' <RfcConnection> using function module 'RCCF_COMM_PROGRESS' for progress informations
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(721) 'MsgMgr' <RfcConnection> using function module 'RCCF_COMM_MESSAGE' for messages
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(730) 'MsgMgr' <RfcConnection> using function module 'RCCF_COMM_RESULT' for (intermediate) result informations
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(739) 'MsgMgr' <RfcConnection> using function module 'RCCF_COMM_SYSINFO' for system informations
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(748) 'MsgMgr' <RfcConnection> using function module 'RCCF_COMM_PERFINFO' for performance informations
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(1269) 'MsgMgr' <RFC> skipping empty profile value [GENERAL] sPROFILE_CUST_ID
 04:37:59 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(1835) 'MsgMgr'
Sender/Receiver RFC_HANDLE#1:
<RFC> * RFC connection attributes:
Own Host : m0001006
Partner Host: m0001006
Destination : OPTSERVER_CTM01
Program Name: SAPLRCC_COMM_ENGINE
SystemNr : 04 SystemId : SC6
Client : 700 User : MBATCHA
Language : E ISO Language: EN
CodePage : 1100 Partner CP : 1100
Kernel Rel. : 701 Partner Rel.: 701
Own Release : 711 CPIC ConvId : 28812935
Own Type : E PartnerType : 3
Trace : RFC Role : S
<RFC> * RFC statistic information:
number of calls : 7
number of received data: 10569
number of sent data : 1349
overall reading time : 9073
overall writing time : 162
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(1110) 'SuperVisor' * Starting MainScript ...
 04:37:59 optsvr_main.cpp(1445) 'SuperVisor'
***************************** OPTSVR - OPTIONS ***************************** *
[CTM_PROFILE]
nCTMENGINEPACKAGESIZE = 500
sCOMPONENT = SCM
sCTMLOGFILE = ctm.DEMO2.0000_0001.20091201043758.log
sCTMLOGFLAG = 0
sCTMPROFILE = DEMO2
sRELEASE = 700
[general]
bUNICODE = true
nSLOT_MAXIMUM = 1
nSLOT_MINIMUM = 1
nSLOT_RESERVED = 1
sAPO_RELEASE = 700
sAPPLICATION = CTM
sExeDir = d:\apoopt\ctm\bin
sExeName = ctmsvr.exe
sHOST = m0001006
sInvokeMode = invoke
sLANGU = E
sMANDT = 700
sPRODUCT_NAME = APO
sPRODUCT_PATCHLEVEL = 0001
sPRODUCT_RELEASE = 700
sPROFILE = DEMO2
sSESSION = tju5Bmz21}6WVG0Sn6pv3W
sSYSTEM = SC6
sUNAME = MBATCHA
[init]
sSECTION0001 = INIT
sSECTION0002 = GENERAL
sSECTION0003 = PASSPORT
sSECTION0004 = CTM_PROFILE
[PASSPORT]
bIS_REMOTE = false
nACTION_TYPE = 1
nSERVICE = 1
sACTION = /SAPAPO/CTMB
sPRE_SYSID = SC6
sSYSID = SC6
sTRANSID = 2205DEDE7A5BF16DA07D001CC46CF90E
sUSERID = MBATCHA
************************** OPTSVR OPTIONS - END **************************** *
 04:37:59 core_msgmgr.cpp(440) 'MsgMgr' * Sending progress number 802 to OutputInterface from []
 04:37:59 core_supervisor.cpp(728) 'SuperVisor' <M> Invoking module 'CTMModelGenerator' [6]->download
 04:37:59 core_msgmgr.cpp(440) 'MsgMgr' * Sending progress number 806 to OutputInterface from [MG]
 04:37:59 ctm_modelgen.cpp(166) 'CTMModelGenerator' ======================================================================
 04:37:59 ctm_modelgen.cpp(167) 'CTMModelGenerator' MG::download
 04:37:59 core_msgmgr.cpp(1110) 'MsgMgr' renaming tracefile
 04:37:59 core_msgmgr.cpp(1111) 'MsgMgr' old name: optsvr_trace20091201_043759_1a70.log
 04:37:59 core_msgmgr.cpp(1112) 'MsgMgr' new name: ctm.DEMO2.20091201_043759_1a70.log
logfile reopened : Tue Dec 01 04:37:59 2009
logfile name : ctm.DEMO2.20091201_043759_1a70.log
 04:37:59 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_STATUS_SET
 04:37:59 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_PRDAT_RFC_READ
 04:37:59 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_PLPAR_RFC_READ
 04:37:59 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_LOC_RFC_READ
 04:37:59 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_PPM_RFC_READ
 04:38:02 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_TRANS_RFC_READ
 04:38:02 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_RES_RFC_READ
 04:38:02 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_SSTCK_RFC_READ
 04:38:02 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_CAL_RFC_READ
 04:38:02 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_PLPER_RFC_READ
 04:38:02 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_INCMD_RFC_READ
 04:38:03 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_STATUS_SET
 04:38:03 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_DEM_RFC_READ
 04:38:04 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_SUP_RFC_READ
 04:38:04 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_UCMAP_RFC_READ
 04:38:04 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_STATUS_SET
 04:38:04 core_msgmgr.cpp(440) 'MsgMgr' * Sending progress number 810 to OutputInterface from [MG]
 04:38:04 ctm_modelgen.cpp(735) 'CTMModelGenerator' MG::download done
 04:38:04 ctm_modelgen.cpp(736) 'CTMModelGenerator' ======================================================================
 04:38:04 core_supervisor.cpp(750) 'SuperVisor' <M> Returning from module 'CTMModelGenerator' [6]->download = success [ctx size : 1]
 04:38:04 core_supervisor.cpp(692) 'SuperVisor' <SCR> Starting script 'CTM Solve' with 9.22337e+012 seconds left
 04:38:04 core_supervisor.cpp(692) 'SuperVisor' <SCR> Starting script 'CTM Match' with 9.22337e+012 seconds left
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(102) 'SuperVisor' ======================================================================
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(103) 'SuperVisor' statistics:
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(104) 'SuperVisor' number of demands: 7
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(105) 'SuperVisor' ======================================================================
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(107) 'SuperVisor' ======================================================================
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(108) 'SuperVisor' parameters:
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(118) 'SuperVisor' time continuous planning
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(125) 'SuperVisor' backward scheduling
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(184) 'SuperVisor' CBCLP enabled
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(457) 'SuperVisor' ======================================================================
 04:38:04 core_supervisor.cpp(728) 'SuperVisor' <M> Invoking module 'CtmEngine' [7]->run
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(523) 'SuperVisor' ======================================================================
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(524) 'SuperVisor' EM::execute for packet 1
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(1570) 'SuperVisor' EM::execute for packet 1 done
 04:38:04 ctm_executionmanager.cpp(1571) 'SuperVisor' ======================================================================
 04:38:04 core_supervisor.cpp(750) 'SuperVisor' <M> Returning from module 'CtmEngine' [7]->run = success [ctx size : 1]
 04:38:04 core_supervisor.cpp(728) 'SuperVisor' <M> Invoking module 'CTMModelGenerator' [6]->upload
 04:38:04 ctm_modelgen.cpp(1097) 'CTMModelGenerator' ======================================================================
 04:38:04 ctm_modelgen.cpp(1098) 'CTMModelGenerator' MG::upload of packet 1
<e> 04:38:05 ctmsvr_script.cpp(229) 'SuperVisor' <!> STRING EXCEPTION : <!> Segmentation fault
 04:38:05 rfc_connection.cpp(599) 'MsgMgr' <rfc> calling function module /SAPAPO/CTM_INT_STATUS_SET
 04:38:05 optsvr_main.cpp(1166) 'MsgMgr' Current check values:
[CHECK_EQUAL]
[CHECK_UPPERBOUND]
nPEAK_MEMORY_NTAMD64 = 45344
[CHECK_LOWERBOUND]
 04:38:05 optsvr_main.cpp(1209) 'MsgMgr' Performance values:
bSuccess false
nCPU_TIME 0
nPEAK_MEMORY 45344
nPEAK_VIRTUAL_BYTES 141844
nREAL_TIME 6
tracefile ctm.DEMO2.20091201_043759_1a70.log
 04:38:05 optsvr_main.cpp(1235) 'MsgMgr' Performance Monitor values:
ENGINE_VERSION 7.0_REL SP05, 407661, Nov 25 2009 22:59:47
nCPU_TIME 0
nHD_FREESPACE 190433
nPEAK_MEMORY 45344
nPEAK_VIRTUAL_BYTES 141844
nREAL_TIME 6
 04:38:05 optsvr_dsr.cpp(96) 'MsgMgr' <writeDSRdata> tracing not active => no DSR written
 04:38:05 optsvr_main.cpp(1256) 'SuperVisor'
Finished->FAILED ...
 04:38:05 core_memmgr.cpp(564) 'MsgMgr' transferring memory of heap 6912 to main heap
 04:38:05 core_memmgr.cpp(606) 'MsgMgr' finished transfer of heap 6912
 04:38:05 optsvr_rfcconnection.cpp(1835) 'MsgMgr'
Sender/Receiver RFC_HANDLE#1:
<RFC> * RFC connection attributes:
Own Host : m0001006
Partner Host: m0001006
Destination : OPTSERVER_CTM01
Program Name: SAPLRCC_COMM_ENGINE
SystemNr : 04 SystemId : SC6
Client : 700 User : MBATCHA
Language : E ISO Language: EN
CodePage : 1100 Partner CP : 1100
Kernel Rel. : 701 Partner Rel.: 701
Own Release : 711 CPIC ConvId : 28812935
Own Type : E PartnerType : 3
Trace : RFC Role : S
<RFC> * RFC statistic information:
number of calls : 116
number of received data: 420457
number of sent data : 39262
overall reading time : 5.30093e+006
overall writing time : 3831
 04:38:05 optsvr_main.cpp(1332) 'MsgMgr'
OptimizeServer says GOOD BYE
Please help me to resolve this issue.
Thanks & Regards,
Khadar

Hi Khadar,
1) The information you have provided is the CTM optimiser log.
Run the job in background and in sm37 and click on job log &
analyse the exact error happened. In case if you are not able
to do, please provide the error log.
2) Check the livecache is stable in its operations when the job
runs (check with basis team)
3) Run consistency check for master data before CTM run
4) Check for any struck queues and clear those and rerun
5) If you feel more inconsistencies in system, run livecache
consistency and rerun CTM run
Regards
R. Senthil Mareeswaran.

Regenerative planning run in APO

Hi experts,
I need your input on the following scenario.
We have APO PPDS implemented for our Manufacturing industry client. We have designed to run only Net Change Planning every day and there is no design to run Regenerative Planning.
What is the importance of running Regenerative Planning? What do we lose if we don't run a regenerative planning?
We have CTP scenario, so there are lot of parts planned automatically.
Is there any impact of automatic planning on Regenerative planning and vice versa?
What is the best practice to follow with respect to Regenerative Planning?
I appreciate if someone could answer these questions. Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Manimaran M.

Hello Mani
Following are details are from old SAP Handbook, good information to understand the concept.
====
Net Change Planning
Automatic material requirements planning is especially hard on system performance for production processes with complicated BOM structures. To guarantee frequent planning runs of those materials which are relevant for planning despite this problem, you can carry out the planning run with the "net change planning" procedure. This process only plans those materials which have undergone a change relevant to material requirements planning (for example, change in a production order due to excessive scrap, a new sales order, and so on) since the last planning run.
The so-called planning file exists especially for the planning run and contains all the materials and their respective MRP types. If a material is changed in a way that is relevant to the planning run, it is given a net change indicator meaning that it will be included in the next net change planning run. In a net change planning run, only these materials are planned.
Net Change Planning in the Planning Horizon
Performance can be improved even further by using the net change planning run in the planning horizon. Here, only those changes relevant to requirements planning that fall within a specific period (defined by the user and known as the planning horizon) are included in the planning run. It is advisable in this situation to carry out a total planning run in regular intervals (for example, weekly or monthly) to keep the planning results completely up-to-date.
Regenerative Planning
It is also possible to carry out a regenerative planning run. In this planning run, the system plans all materials that are relevant for planning. Usually, the regenerative planning run is only carried out in the implementation stages.
===
Hope this will help.
Thank you
Satish Waghmare

Planning Run through MD01

I was trying to take planning run for several plants,
made necessary config in spro, but unable to generate plan orders,
when i taking planning run through MD02, Plan order for material is generated, Kindly help me to find where i have missed the settings, no error is cooming when i am taking planning run

Hello Abhay,
MD01 is not advisable to run for all plants (if you are working with scope of planning). Run the same from MDBT transaction in background and check the spool log once this MRP finish...This will be better advisable from SAP. here you will come to know which materials are planned or which are not.
1) Check the controller parameters are same of your MD02 and MD01 to create planned orders.
2) Check indicator 3 delete and recreate data in controller parameter for MD01.
3) Check planned all components from the sane screen.
4) Run with regenerative planning if it is first time.
Run the job from SE38 with variant to create plannig file entries for all parts in plants.
Check whether MRP area activate check box is active or not in customizing...check the same whether plant level MRP indicator activated in customizing.
Please let me know whether your problem is solved. Thanks
Regsrds...
TAJUDDIN

One BR to copy data in two plan type

Hi, I encountered this problem with the business rules.
In order to run the what-if scenario analysis, I would like to be able to copy the data from one version to another version using a business rule. However, currently I have two plan type within one planning application. And I have to use two business rules (with run-time prompt) to make the data copy. The run-time prompt for the 2 BRs are the same, for example, same entity, samel copy-from version, and same copy-to version.
I would like the users to just run one business rules (or maybe a sequence) with one set of RTPs to choose, and it allows them to copy both plan type. I have tried to use the sequence, but it seems that the sequence would require the 2 sets of RTPs to be input.
Any advice is appreciated.
THANKS

Alp,
Yes. I have tried to use the global variables, with the BR sequence. However, since the two BRs are for two different plan type (essbase cubes), when I choose the merge variable option, it did merge the global variable, and also limit the database name selection to one. (I can not choose the "hide" for the database).
Any other suggestion?
Thanks

Help needed with missing data problem in CRVS2010

We recently upgraded the reporting engine in our product to use Crystal Reports for Visual Studio 2010 (previously engine was CR9). Our quote report, which has numerous subreports and lots of conditional formatting, started losing data when a quote took more than a single page to be printed. We knew the SQL results included the data, but the report was not printing those lines at all or sometimes printing a partial line. In addition, the running total on the report would exclude the lines that were being missed on the next page. In one example submitted by a customer, 3 lines were skipped between pages.
I think I have identified two potential issues that document the possibility of data not being included in the report.
The first potential issue is an issue with the "suppress blank section" option being checked. This issue is supposedly fixed with ADAPT01483793, being released someday with service pack 2 for CRVS2010.
The second potential issue is using shared variables. This issue is supposedly fixed with ADAPT01484308, also targeted for SP2.
Our quote report does not explicitly use shared variables with any of the subreports, but it does have several subreports, each in its own section that has the "supress blank section" option checked. We have other reports that use this feature, as well, and they are not exhibiting the problem.
One different thing about the quote report is that it has a section with multiple suppression options selected. The section has a conditional suppression formula, which controls whether the section is included at all within the report. The section also has the suppress blank section option selected. There are multiple fields within the report that are each conditionally suppressed. In theory, the section's suppress formula could evaluate to true, yet all of the fields within the section are suppressed (due to null values), and then the "suppress blank section" option would kick in.
The missing data only seems to happen when the section is not being suppressed, and at least one of the fields is being included in the report. If I clear the "suppress blank section" check box, and change the section formula to also include the rules applied to the fields in the section, the missing data problem seems to be resolved.
Is this related to ADAPT01483793? Will it be fixed in service pack 2?
If more details are needed, I would be happy to provide a sample report with stored data.

Hi Don,
Have a look at the Record Selection formula in CR Designer ( stand alone ) and when exported to RPT format opening that report in the Designer also.
There's been a few issues with => logic in the record selection formula. It could be you are running into this problem. Look for NOT inserted into your selection formula.
Oh and SP2 is coming out shortly so it may resolve the issue. But if you want you could purchase a support, or if you have a support contract then create a case in SMP and get a rep to work with you to debug the issue.
If you have not try the Trial Version of CR 2011, put it on a VM-ware image or Test PC so you don't corrupt anything for production and have a look at and test it in that designer also. If you purchase a case and it is a bug then you'll get a credit back for the case.
Don
Edited by: Don Williams on Oct 26, 2011 7:40 AM

Not able to Upload data in Demand Planning data view

Hi
I am trying to upload a csv file in to Demand planning interactive planning through " Upload Data " functionality
First I exported data from interactive planning , updated some data in file and again trying to upload same file.
I am getting following error
File cannot be uploaded
Message no. /SAPAPO/SDP_UPLOAD009
Diagnosis
File has no technical information or incorrect technical information.
Procedure
Save the file again locally. Make sure that the file has the technical information.
Could u please suggest what needs to be done
Thanks and regards,
Nitin Lavhe

Hello,
For using the upload data functionality from interactive planning grid, you need to first download the data. While downloading the data, please check the check box for "Prepare the file for upload at later time", and then select the option of putting the technical setting into the file or into the system. Either way is okay. Then try uploading the same file.
This should solve your problem.
Thank you.
Regards,
Jacky Jain.
SAP APO Architect.

SNP Optimiser issue (Annual Planning Run)

Dear Friends,
My fiscal year is 01.04.2010 to 31.03.2011, Now I am trying to run Annual planning run for the current FY.
After the run, If i see in SNPOPLOG, all demand is showing as unfulfilled. If i run for the next FY it is planning.
I want to run for the current FY, what settings I need to do?
sree

What is the time bucket profile of data view in which u are running optimizer. If it is a single yearly bucket you cannot run optimizer in current year. (your first bucket cannot have the start date in past)
Choose 12 monthly buckets. and run planning. You may 'view' the planning results in single annual bucket.
even if you do this, there will be no plan in current month. system will plan from next month onwards.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Nitin
Edited by: Nitin Thatte on Apr 13, 2010 6:01 PM

Error in generating data source from planning area

Hi experts! I have an error while making data source from planning area:
after the screen when i fill in the data source name (Window name: Generate export data source) i have the SYNTAX_ERROR Message:
Syntax error in program /sapapo/cl_im_extract_ex======cp
the main reason: the type /BI0/9A0IVWKNDGD is unknown
what you can suggest to solve this problem?
Thanks.

Dear Andrey Kudriavzev,
The reason is the program is trying to use the datatype '/BI0/9A0IVWKNDGD' which does not exist in the system.
Go SE11 to cross check if it exists. Check dataelement radiobutton -> enter /BI0/9A0IVWKNDGD -> Choose display option. You would need to create this datatype in the system. I feel there must some OSS Note related to this.
Search for an OSS Note. Raise one if you cannot find the relevant notes.
Regards,
Naveen.

Data access error while running the script in fdm workbench script editor

Hello Experts,
I have been getting the error when i run the script in script editor of fdqm workbench client.this is the error
                          -2147467259 Data access error and it is navigating the error at line 30 about this script "Set rsAppend = DW.DataAccess.farsTable(strWorkTableName)"
Please revert me asap where i should load the data from peoplesoft to one of my planning database through fdm.
Thanks in advance...

Hi,
Thanks for your suggestion's here i am going to run the datapump script so while i am running in workbench it is throwing data access error.So as you guy's suggested i created one import format and added this script to that import format which is added to one of my location even it is throwing the same error.I am getting the error at this sentence   "strWorkTableName" I want to know what is this where it reflect's?So my question is Is there any difference while running data pump or integration script.Please let me know a detailed navigation steps to run this script's with out data access error to run these kind of scripts.
Note:Again my target is to load the data to planning database through fdqm which i am doing through sql statement's.
Suggest your valuable suggestion's
Thanks in advance...
I am getting the error at this sentence   "strWorkTableName" I want to know what is this where it reflect's?

Reschedulig Date Problem in Planning Run

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for