Reseting status of normal correction

Hello.
After update up to version ST 20 (SAPKITL430) one more error appear in system. After processing of any activity with normal correction and trying to save this document system resets status of correction to "Created". I have found coresponding SAP Note 919477, but it has't any correction instruction... Can you help me?
Edited by: Dmitry Udot on Sep 25, 2009 11:02 AM

Hehe... you are right.
First off I think it should be SDMI_ACTIONS not DMI_ACTIONS.
And yes, there should be some more instructions, hehe. Probably delete it (after making a screenshot).
The selected schedule condtion looks strange. Because as for what I can tell it says:
Set User Status to E0001 (new) when user status is not:
consolidated AND NOT productive AND new (consolidated and productive belong to SDMJ not SDMI, new fits to both)
OR
in developement (fits to SDMI and SDMJ)
So whenever you set (SDMI or SDMJ) to "in developement" it will be set back to E0001. Very strange.
Guess you may delete it or at least disable the action.
Regards

Similar Messages

  • Unable to chage the status of normal correction to confirm successful test

    Hello,
    I am unable to chage the status of normal correction to confirm successful test in solman. Its shows error:
    Not all test transports are imported .
    I have imported the test trasnport in to test system successfully but still i am getting this error . I have also checked blogs in SDN but non of them refers to any solutions. But I can see lot of people have faced this issue.
    My configuration is fine and no error in application log.
    Can any body help me to find the resolution for this problem? answers will be rewarded.
    Regards,
    Bhavesh

    Hello Mark,
    Thanks for the update. But non of the above option can resolve m issue because :
    1) Note 1352886: is not relavent as I laready have the higher patch level of solution manager for ST comonant( SAPKITL431).
    2) I have already gone through this blog this blog talks about the status of maintenance cycle but in my case the maintenance cycle status is fine  (in developemnt without release) . So as per process till now i am on the correct status.
    I appreciate your updaes but still I am not able to change the status to consolidate. because of error Not all test transports have been imported.
    Please let me know if you have any other solutions for this error.
    Regards,
    Bhavesh

  • Normal Correction document is reset to Created by itself

    Dear everyone:
    We have configured ChaRM - Solution Manager 4.0 (SP9). The ChaRM works fine on Urgent Correction, but not for Normal Correction. The Status of (Normal) Correction document always reset back to Created. It does not want to stay as 'In development' status.
    Here is the step I took to create new change document with a  Subject : Normal Correction(maintenance).
    I authorized the change document, then I choose Maintenance Cycle (Normal/Periodic Maintenance).
    Next document / correction document -> 8000000196, Status: Created. I choose set in Development. - Status of correction document is: In Development
    Next step, I choose Create Transport Request - transport request generated for document. Then all the sudden the status of correction Document is back to Created.
    And I can not go to any where else....
    Would anyone please help me out?
    Thank you.
    Kind regards,
    Rudy

    Hi Steven:
    There are some actions are the detail -
    Action 1: (yellow light) During Creation
    detail: (green) check successful
    Action 2: (yellow light) Check Consistency:
    detail: (green) Check successful
    Action 3: (red light) for Copy a Solution Manager Context:
    detail: (green) date/time stamp
    (green) Processing SOCM_COPY_CONTEXT is started.
    (red) Action could not be successfully executed (no processing parameter)
    The other one has yellow status, and the processing parameter shown as
    --> No container is available, for application name CRM_ORDER, Action profile SDMI_Action
    Action 4: (green) set to 'In Development' :
    (green) Processing HF_SET_STATUS Is Started
    (green) Action successfully completed
    Action 5: (green) Create Transport Request:
    (green) Processing HF_Execute_Action Is Started
    (green) Request ID and Number created
    (green) Action successfully completed
    As soon as triggered Create transport, then the Document status back to 'Created', and I only have two choices in the action button ... set in Development or Cancel Procedure.
    What would cause this issue ?
    Thank you in advance.
    Kind regards,
    Rudy

  • Normal Correction/Development Activity

    i am creating Development(Implementation) type change request, , after setting the status of the Change Request In Development and created the transport request. after creating TR its status automatically resets to "CREATED" again and again each time i create transport request??
    Plus if we have imported a TR once in QAS and reset the status to "In DEvelopment" and created new transport request , by again "Import Transport Request (Background) it will transport the new TR only??
    For normal correction/Development Activity we ahve to import transport request manually from task list???
    Thanks

    Hi
    This should slove your problem
    Note 919477 - Normal correction reset to status "created"
    santosh

  • Process Flow for Normal Correction

    Hi All
    I am searching for a process flow for a normal correction. In specific I need to know who does what in terms of crating transports and releasing transports. I need to have a guide on the entire process as well as the status that the relevent parties change it to. For more info please let me know.
    Santosh

    Hi friend,
    This is answer to all your queries concerned.*need S-user for this
    https://websmp106.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700000086572008E.sim
    Pls assign pts and can close the thread.

  • Current Proccesor in normal correction activity

    Dear all helpers.
    Please, what is actual role for Current processor in activity normal correction? Is it developer? Or is it simple the one, who proccess the activity NOW, I this role is changing during life cycle of correction? My concern is, that there is possibility to choose developers and other roles at the sheet partners.
    Thank you for explanation.
    Many thanx
    Petr

    hi Petr,
    there are indeed different way to interpret this. It can be a "current processor" whaterer the function behind or the "main processor", in this case this is fixed.
    The fact that by default prompt to become the processor each time someone enters the document shows that SAP has chosen a moving value there.
    In our company we have choosen a fixed value. This is the one doing the actual change. (customizing or development)
    The other partner functions are well defined (like IT operator,...) and these partners are playing their role depending on the correction status.
    Both approach are valid for me
    best regards
    Xavier

  • Import Items Request remain in Status Pending Normal For a Long Period

    Hi,
    Import Items Concurrent Requests Remain in Status Pending Normal For a Long Period(30 minutes) Before Running.
    It is actually completing within 10 minutes after pending normal for 30 minutes.
    This problem is happening only with Import Items concurrent request, Other request are running as soon as they started.
    My Application version: 12.1.3
    Database Version:11.1.0.7
    My Standard Manager details Processes=16 Sleep Time=10 Cache=40
    Please correct, If there is need to change Standard Manager configuration...
    Plz reply soon.
    Regards,
    Alig

    Alig,
    Standard Manager is running this request, Import Item program request after the completion, creating Item categories for this it is taking time, that is the reason another import items request is waiting for the Item categories program to be completed.You need to find out why the "Item Categories" takes that long to complete.
    Do you have the statistics up to date?
    Enable trace as per these docs to find out why the request takes that long.
    How to Set a Trace with Bind and Waits from the Concurrent Request Form [ID 601647.1]
    How To Trace a Concurrent Request And Generate TKPROF File [ID 453527.1]
    Thanks,
    Hussein

  • Normal Correction flow & Transport of copies

    Hi,
    I am performing following steps for Normal Correction. But when I first time schedule the imoprt job, nothing is moved to Quality system.
    u2022     Action u2018Set to In developmentu2019. Status changes to u2018In Developmentu2019.
    u2022     Perform action u2018Create Transport Requestu2019. Transport Request (ID6K900342) created.
    u2022     Change the Maintenance Cycle phase to u2018Development with Releaseu2019
    u2022     Developer completes the work & releases the Task in satellite system
    u2022     Action: u2018Test Transportu2019. Creates Transport of copies (ID6K900344)
    u2022     Schedule the import job. ( But after executing also nothing will be moved to Quality)
    u2022     Action:  u2018Complete Developmentu2019. System creates another new Transport of copies (ID6K900347) for Original Request.
    u2022     Schedule the Import job. ( But after executing also nothing will be moved to Quality)
    What could be the reason. both the TP copies are in queue only, nothing is moved to quality.
    Regards
    PK

    Hi PK,
    Let me try to explain:
    NC => 80000001
    1. Create TR
    XXXK0001 (Original TR)
    2. "Test Transport" or "Complete Development"
    XXXK0001 (Original TR) -> still not released
    XXXK0002 (ToC- copy of XXXK0001)-> is created in DEV
    3. Import TRs to QAS (from task list)
    XXXK0001 (Original TR) -> still not released
    XXXK0002 (ToC) -> is moved to QAS
    4. Now the changes are in QAS, but is not placed in the PRD import queue. So, you can test it with no risk.
    5. If you have problem, go back to 'In development'
    Correct the problem in XXXK0001
    and go to step 2 again.
    6. If the changes are OK in QAS
    - Select 'successful tested'
    XXXK0001 (Original TR) -> is released
    7. Import to QAS
    XXXK0001 imported in QAS and automatically placed in PRD import queue.
    8. Import to PRD
    The ToC is used to avoid import an inconsistent TR into PRD system, because once it has been imported in QAS, the same will be available to import into PRD, without any test.
    BR
    Fernando

  • CHARM: Developer and Tester same USER in normal correction

    Hi Expert,
    i'd like to know if in a normal correction it is possible that Developer and Tester are the same persone.
    So the same user have to confirm development and confirm sucessful test.
    Now if i try to use the same user i've an error.
    Can you help me ??
    thanks
    Francesca

    SPRO
    search for Make Settings to Change Transaction Types, and select that activity.
    Highlight SDMJ, select the Use Partner Functions folder on the left
    in the table on the right:
    The first column in the table is the status
    The second column in the table  is the partner function that the current business partner will be assigned to when save is clicked and the status becomes the first column.
    The third column in the table is used for determining if partner functionsu2019 business partners are the same when the document is saved and the status becomes the first column. For example, the Tester (SDCD0002) equals the Developer (SDCD0001) when the status is Confirmed (E0009).
    Delete the value in the third column to stop the comparison.

  • Issue with normal correction.

    Hello,
    I am configuring ChaRM in SolMan system. I am able to perform the steps mentioned in the RKT. But currently I am facing 2 issues.
    1. There is no action as "Create Change Request" in the support message. I can see only "Create Change Document". How can I get that action? What is the difference between a change request and chage document?
    2. For normal correction (maintenance), once the message reaches the status "In developement", when I try to perform the action "Logon to the system", nothing is happening and I am getting successfull message saying "Action Logon to system performed immediately".
    Please help me to solve these problems.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Rajeev.

    Hi,
    1. There is no action as "Create Change Request" in the support message. I can see only "Create Change docuement" How can I get that action? What is the difference between a change request and chage document?
    you are correct only action is there create change document because first a change document is created for Change manager approval and after his approval and concern he create a type of correction ithen only u get the next doc.
    2. For normal correction (maintenance), once the message reaches the status "In developement", when I try to perform the action "Logon to the system", nothing is happening and I am getting successfull message saying "Action Logon to system performed immediately".
    Check your authorization to logon to that satellite system
    Regards
    Prakhar

  • Confirm Successful Test in Normal Correction (SDMJ)

    Hello,
    In normal correction (SDMJ) workflow, the action Confirm Successful Test is selected in the Development with Release phase of a project/maintenance cycle. The status of the Change document changes to Consolidated after that, and you then be able to move the cycle to Test phase.
    How can we customise the standard workflow so that Confirm Successful Test is selected in the Test phase? This seems to make better sense.
    I'd appreciate any help from any one of you who have done some customising to the SDMJ standard workflow. Many thanks in advance for your help.
    BR Li

    Hi Li,
    I had the same dscussion with my customers more than once, it is hard to understand to perform the action "Confirm Successful Test" before Test phase.
    You could add another status to SDMJ (or a copy of SDMJ, for instance ZDMJ) before Consolidated.
    But we selected another option, by using test messages during test phase and therefore following SAP standard process. So, a developer confirms successful integration/unit testing after he finished his development/customizing activities in dev by changing the status to consolidated.
    If some issues are detected in Test phase, we are using test messages to correct it. But you are right, at the end of test phase there is no additional status which says: all is fine, go ahead and move it to production. Only be checking that all Test messages are finished, the Production transport approver can be sure, all issues have been resolved.
    But by adding another status, please consider this: You have to create a copy of SDMJ (ZDMJ). After this, all enhancements and changes to SDMJ delivered by SAP, you have to do manually for your new transaction type ZDMJ, otherwise you will not get the functionality. That's why I'd recommend to use SDMJ as delivered by SAP and also use Test messages during test phase.
    Best Regards,
    Holger Slomka

  • Charms :  Background job not scheduled (normal correction) ?

    Hi,
    I am trying to run a dry cycle for normal correction but when i go to task plan in any ticket to release a request. When i schedule this job " release a request" , i dont see any job running in background in SM37. I think job is not gettin sceduled properly.
    Please help me out

    Hi,
    All right. We need to dig this one
    I guess you schedule the import by going the the tasklist
    and you get a red flag for this activity in the calendar ? do you have any error message ?
    If the messagein the task-list is not self-explanatory you can check the SLG1 log in SOLMAN. Which error message do you get there. (select the correct time frame, the log could be big)
    My guess is that some S_RFC authorisation is still missing there
    This authorisation is outside SAP_ALL and is often the cause of this kind of issue
    Tell me the error message and we will hopefully  fix this (I had the same kind of issue when I started last year)
    best regards Xavier

  • Creation of New consistencycheck condition for Normal Correction

    Hi,
    We are using ChaRM normal correction to check the transport imported to production system we are using the check conditon 'PRODUCTION_IMPORT_OK' which is implemented in Class CL_SOCM_INSTANCE .
    On similar base we wanted to create the condition of 'ZTEST_IMPORT_OK' for normal correction, but we are not able to find the Standard code written for condition PRODUCTION_IMPORT_OK.
    If find this code we can make some adjustment in this code with BADI for consistency check to implement the new condition .
    Is any one worked on this type of condition , your help will be appreciated.
    Regards,
    Amar Kamat

    HI
    Check if needed to assign any account key to this new condition type in your procedure if needed, then mantain the GL acc for the same.
    If you are adding this condition type in your TAXINN procedure (assuming so) you need to create the condition type for the same by using trax FV11.
    If you are adding your condition type in Pricing procedure then no ned to create the condition record.
    Regards
    Sujoy

  • Dot11Radio0 stuck in reset status after changing the station role

    Hi Everyone.
    I've got a AIR-AP1231G-A-K9 router. IOS has been upgraded to the latest version c1200-k9w7-mx.123-8.JED. Everything worked fine before I change the station role from root to repeater or workgroup bridge. Following is my configuration:
    ap#sh run
    Building configuration...
    Current configuration : 1224 bytes
    version 12.3
    no service pad
    service timestamps debug datetime msec
    service timestamps log datetime msec
    service password-encryption
    hostname ap
    enable secret 5 $1$KHHu$bN/odUmHdmb.0cwa57GYs1
    ip subnet-zero
    no aaa new-model
    dot11 syslog
    dot11 ssid Lanyard
    authentication open
    username Cisco password 7 123A0C041104
    bridge irb
    interface Dot11Radio0
    no ip address
    no ip route-cache
    ssid Lanyard
    speed basic-1.0 basic-2.0 basic-5.5 6.0 9.0 basic-11.0 12.0 18.0 24.0 36.0 48.0 54.0
    station-role root
    bridge-group 1
    bridge-group 1 subscriber-loop-control
    bridge-group 1 block-unknown-source
    no bridge-group 1 source-learning
    no bridge-group 1 unicast-flooding
    bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled
    interface FastEthernet0
    no ip address
    no ip route-cache
    duplex auto
    speed auto
    bridge-group 1
    no bridge-group 1 source-learning
    bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled
    interface BVI1
    ip address 11.11.11.1 255.255.255.0
    no ip route-cache
    ip http server
    no ip http secure-server
    ip http help-path http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/779/smbiz/prodconfig/help/eag
    ip radius source-interface BVI1
    bridge 1 route ip
    line con 0
    line vty 0 4
    login local
    line vty 5 15
    login
    end
    ap#sh ip int bri
    Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol
    BVI1 11.11.11.1 YES NVRAM up up
    Dot11Radio0 unassigned YES NVRAM up up
    FastEthernet0 unassigned YES NVRAM up down
    ap#
    Then I changed the station role
    ap#conf t
    ap(config)#int dot 0
    ap(config-if)#station-role repeater
    ap(config-if)#end
    ap#sh ip int brie
    Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol
    BVI1 11.11.11.1 YES NVRAM down down
    Dot11Radio0 unassigned YES NVRAM reset down
    FastEthernet0 unassigned YES NVRAM up down
    ap#
    Interface Dot11Radio0 stuck in reset. No matter I reload or powercycle the AP, I still get the same reset status on Dot11Radio0.
    Please help! Any input will be appreciated.

    In order to get either the repeater or the workgroup bridge functionality working, you would likely need to have a Cisco AP as root. This is because the repeater and workgroup-bridge functionalities require Cisco Aironet Information Element (IE), which requires a Cisco root AP. There is no standard for interoperability for these functionalities (not part of any 802.11 standards). You can always try to connect them, making sure that they are using the same authentication/encryption configuration. However, it is unlikely to work.

  • I keep getting an error message when logging onto iCloud. It states that "you cant sign in because of a server error".  But the cloud status is "normal".

    This is happened today after I udpated my iPad to IOS v7 and iTunes to 11.1.0.126  and only for one of my computers.  I keep on getting an error message when trying to log onto iCloud.  The error message is "you cannot sign-in because of a server error" but the iCloud status is "normal" and iCloud is fine on my other computers.

    Next day the problem still continued.  I did restart my computer a couple of times and then "it worked".  Not sure why - if it really was a server problem or something on my side.

Maybe you are looking for

  • "Errors found during the burning process"

    Hello, I created an iDVD project that includes: 1. 108-minute movie 2. 6-minute movie 3. 3-minute movie 4. 12-minute slide show (3 four-minute slide shows) The project worked fine in the iDVD Preview. I then attempted to burn the DVD right from iDVD,

  • NI 9402 edge counter works, no frequency though

    Hi guys, I've been searching these forums for about 20 hours now but I still can't seem to get this to work. I have a NI cDAQ-9172 with a NI-9402 digital I/O module hooked up to an 360 count/rev optical encoder. The encoder produces square wave pulse

  • Sync User with Shared Services

    I noticed that if I provision a user in shared services the user can not log into planning until I restart planning. Is there a way to do this without restarting planning? This also seems to happen with EPM. I know this happens with essbase but you c

  • Can't get shared Gmail calendars to work (Exchange)

    Long time Android user bought an iPhone 5 last night. Having serious trouble getting shared Google calendars to display. I have my Google account set up as Exchange. That seemed to go through smoothly and my main Google calendar shows up just fine. I

  • Optimization for 256 MB of ram server running apache/postgresql

    Hi, I'm on a VPS for 256 MB of ram planning to run Apache and PostgreSQL. Does anyone have recommendations on some settings to use so I can avoid blowing up the server with memory problems due to unnecessary spawning of workers or something like that