Resize smart object?

I can't resize a photo when I drag it to a new layer in another open project. I don't know if it is because it is a smart object or what. My workflow is
capture Raw photo, edit in raw, open in new project as smart layer, resize (fine), select split screen displaying this project and another one. Then I drag the photo across to the other project. A new layer opens in the project that I have copied my photo to but I can't resize it for some reason.
Help... please!
Spaldo

did you try Ctrl+T with that layer selected to bring up Free Transform?

Similar Messages

Resize Smart Object keeping Gaussian blur aspect?

Is there any way (that I'm missing)to resize a smart object wich has a smart gaussian blur filter while keeping the same aspect and without rasterizing it first?
Lets say I'm using a background for a product that needs to be out of focus: ussualy I would convert that background image (a not too large JPG in most casses) to a smart object and then apply a (smart) gaussian blur in case it needs to be further or less focused down the road.
Latter when Image is finished and if for some reason (usualy client complaining about image size) I need to resize the document the settings for blur remain the same causing it to be a lot more unfocused in that new smaller size than the original image size.
Is there any workaround (to keep it editable) that I'm missing?
Ty for any help.

I never really thought of that but makes perfect sense.. ty,sometimes you just need a fresh look into things,now you have mentioned it looks perfectly natural,dont know how I didnt thought of that.big thanks.

"Anti-alias" greyed out when free-transforming smart objects.

While resizing smart objects, I noticed that the anti-aliasing was very contrasting and not smooth enough for my purposes. I realized that if I rasterized the smart object before resizing, the anti-aliasing was better. I then noticed that there was a setting when free-transforming smart objects called "anti-alias." However, I am unable to activate it as it is greyed out. So, here's two questions:
1) Is there a way to make the anti-aliasing for smart objects the same as that of rasterized objects?
2) Is there a way to activate that "anti-alias" setting when free-transforming smart objects?
Thanks in advance for any help you can provide

On top of what Zeno Bokor wrote that while your doing the transform your viewing a quick scaled preview not the actual transformation you wrote
The SOs I'm talking about are bitmap images I made into SOs to be able to resize and edit without destructive changes, not imported vector graphics from AI.
You did not state how you made the bitmap images into smart object. If you just converted a layer you had been working on into a smart object some damage may have already been done to the bitmap image. You might get better results if you started out with a smart object layer to begin with by using ACR open as smart object option or by placing your camera jpeg images into your document as starting points.

After loading a JPEG file into adobe CC as a smart object and trying to resize image I get big jagged edges around the picture.

Also, the anti-aliasing box isn't checked but is greyed out so I can't check it. How can I fix this issue? Thanks for any help!

Smart object layers transform like pixel layers. The resize may be using your default interpolation method. If you left it at Adobe default setting Bicubic Automativ and you are down sizing a sharpen image it may be using Bicubic Sharper. When Bicubic Sharper is used on sharpened image jagged artifacts may happen. Try changing your Photoshop Interpolation preference to plain bicubic. I'm not a fan of Bicubcr Automatic or Bicubic Sharper. I will use Bicubic Sharper when I re-size my soft unsharpen images for the web.

Resizing a RAW Smart Object in a PSD

So I Have a PSD file with one pixel bearing layer that is a Smart Object of a Canon 5D2 RAW file. the rest of the PSD consists of adjustment layers with masks.
I ended up resizing the image to about 2000px wide and accidently clicked the "save" button when i was exiting Photoshop CC without undoing the resize. Thus i now have a PSD file that is of lesser pixel quality than i want.
But... the RAW file in the Smart Object is still the same full size RAW file. If i where to resize the PSD back to the size of the RAW file would it resample that layer or would it just resample the Masks on the Adjustment Layers?
Id like to find a way back to before the untimely save on exit.
thanks!
-Tyler

It would just resample the masks in the adjustment layers. Your Smart Object will have no problem being sized back up.

Illustrator Application Window Resizes When Opening Smart Object from PSD

Hi All, I've taken a vector graphic created in AI CS4 and pasted it into my PSD CS4 doc as a smart object. When the original AI file was created the application window was set as I preferred it, filling my screen. When I double click the Smart Object in PSD to edit it back in Illy, the window that contains the application has been switched off of the fill screen mode and is quite a bit smaller. I know it's small but now I have to click the maximize icon in the application bar to get Illy to fill the screen again. It wouldn't be so bad once, but the application window resizes itself every time I punch back into the smart object from PSD.
Any ideas on how I can get the AI environment from switching around on its own??
Win 7, CS4, all patches current, Dual 22" montiors
thnx,
jeff

I just want to point out that when you open the smart object of course it is not the same file as the original but an embedded copy of it.
That might also have something to do with this issue and might also be a photoshop issue with the smart object and one reason might be that Photoshop is see the image as resolution and Illustrator sees it as a dimension and the teams might be able to do something about this but might not actually be aware of it unless you file a report even if it is not a bug it would then be a feature request.
They might not be able to do anything about it but then there might be a clever engineer with an idea, so it might be worth the report.

Smart Objects: How can I prevent resizing when replacing contents?

There seem to be 2 kinds of smart objects:
One kind where you can replace the contents, no matter what size it has and it will fit into the bounding box of the smart object which is already there.
The other kind where this doesn't happen.
Is there any way to control that behaviour? I found that in older PS-files, replacing contents always made the new content fit into the bounding box, but since CS3, the transformation stays the same which means I have to rescale the smart-object if the content-size has changed.
Example:
Imagine a game cover with screenshots on the back side. Now each screenshot is a smartobject.
All Screenshots are at 640x480 (assumend the standard screen dpi of 72)
Now I found them in a better resolution (1024x768, also 72dpi) and replace the old ones with "replace content".
The old photoshop behaviour: Photoshop would fit the larger image to occupy exactly the same area than it's predecessor.
The new behaviour: The whole Smartobject is enlarged by 160% (not the transformation parameters, the visual appearance.), I have to scale it down to make it fit to the old size.
And I really wonder about having older and newer Photoshop-Files where these Smartobjects behave differently.
Now did I miss something in the help section or is there a way to control this behaviour?

Yes, fortunately, I am a Windows user, but I don't want to start a religious war here And it is also possible to run multiple versions of Adobe products simultaneously under Windows - why shouldn't that be possible? Currently I have CS3 and CS4 and somtimes use CS3 when CS4 is just too buggy to get the job done. Before that I had CS and CS2 on the same machine.
But I wouldn't keep all versions back to PS 6.0 or CS, that would be a bit too chaotic and I'd had to spend days of installing if I get a new computer. I expect those programs to be a little bit backwards-compatible, so I don't have to use many different versions. And for Photoshop, this is mostly the case. It's just very tiny details like Smart Object resizing that seems to work differently.
Otherwise I'm really happy that in CS4 I can finally link Masks to smart objects and apply warp and perspective on them, that's a big plus!

Smart Guides, Constrain Proportions and Resizing an Object.

When I have Smart Guides on and I'm trying to resize an object while holding shift (to constrain) Indesign seems to ignore the shift key. Usually when there's other objects in close proximity, or just closely aligned, vertically or horizontally. The image I posted is a good example. Trying to resize the bracket object while near all those other objects results in a lot of skipping around, and constrain not working. You can see in the image the outline is not constrained, even though I'm holding the shift key. It just wants to jump to those Smart Guides regardless of what I'm trying to tell it to do.
This isn't much of an issue, but basically I'm wondering if this is a bug, or if the Smart Guides, just take priority. It's bit annoying turning smart guides on and off constantly to accomodate this odd behavior. Does anyone have any insight on this?

Hi,
I'm on a Mac Snow Leopard/CS5, and there actually is an update I haven't installed yet. I'm on 7.0.3, so I'll try that out.
If it is a bug it's certainly not the end of the world, but I was curious if anyone else had been dealing with it as well. I love the Smart Guides, except for that.

Smart Objects Vector Resizing is Blurry

Hello all,
I was hoping someone could help me out with this. It's driving me nuts.
Basically, I've always used a combination of vector objects converted to smart objects to retain the ability to resize an object within my master comp...but also be able to make changes to the layer within the smart object if need be. Basically, the primary purpose of a smart object
However, lately, when I convert a VECTOR object to a smart object and increase it's size, the image becomes blurry. Any idea why this is happening? I've linked to a video clip i made to help demonstrate the issue below.
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3645/smartobject.mov

I appreciate the reply...but this has always worked in the past. Even with more complex layers.
If you think it worked in the past, its probably because you had an Illustrator Smart Object. Using Illustrator Smart Objects is the only way you can get genuine vector scaling to work, so that its completely lossless when you rescale. Photoshop vectors only rescale based on the resolution of the child document.
In the case of your example, you can sort out the problem by opening the Smart Object, upscaling it, and saving. You will then have to go back to the master document and transform the object down again by the same proportion.

Enlarged Smart Objects with vectors inside them appear as resized bitmaps

In Photoshop CC for Mac I have...
Created layers of vector art
Combined them into a smart object
Enlarged the smart object (both via "Transform" and "Image Size")
Upon enlarging, the vector objects look the way an enlarged bitmap would (i.e. fuzzy, pixelated, terrible) instead of crisp and clean as a vector should look. I've double- and triple-checked to make sure all layers have remained vector after resizing and they have.
This is a terrible inconvenience for anyone that works heavily with vector smart objects and resizes them. I use this workflow on a daily basis to make adapting interface elements for various screen resolutions easier, without it I am beyond screwed.
If anyone knows a workaround (or if this requires a setting that I haven't found to be changed) please let me know.
Screenshot proof below:

Read this thread -link http://forums.adobe.com/message/3498406#3498406
you may want to read it from the beginning.
Basically while a smart object layer embedded object may contain vector graphics. Photoshop renders a composite for the embedded object and uses the resulting rendered pixels for the smart object layers pixels. When you transform a smart object layer your transforming those pixels like raster layer using your Photoshop preference interpolation preference.. If you want to resize the vector graphics contained in the embedded object you must open the embedded object into the approbate application and resize the embedded object using vector tools. After you commit the resize. Photoshop will update the embedded object and the layers pixel will be the composite rendered for the updated resized embedded object.

Mac locks up when trying to resize a smart object

I'm building a poster with many layers using CS4 and an iMac and I keep running into 1 major problem.
I want to resize one of the layers, so I converted it into a smart object and then hit commant-t to be able to resize it. At this point my computer locks up. I get the spinning wheel and lose all control of my computer.
Can't figure out what the problem is, and the I have to shutdown the computer to regain control.
Any advice?

As with all unexplainable Photoshop-problems You might try trashing the prefs (after making sure all customized presets like Actions, Patterns, Brushes etc. have been saved and making a note of the Preferences You’ve changed) by pressing command-alt-shift on starting the program or starting from a new user-account.
System Maintenance (repairing permissions, purging PRAM, running cron-scripts, etc.) might also be beneficial.

RAW as Smart Objects - Lock Edge Pixel Opacity During Resize

I'm a professional fine art printer. I prepare images for large format printing, often starting from the original RAW files. Since the feature to open RAW files as Smart Objects in Camera Raw was introduced, I've been doing that, as it allows me to go back into the Raw file at anytime and re-tweak as I layer. I love this option and it is totally indispensable to my workflow.
HOWEVER, I find a serious flaw when resizing the image for final print, or even when resizing for web-output. If I do any interpolation (pixel resizing) up or down, the edge pixels are not locked in place, and treated as if they are a floating object, therefore the edge pixels usually show up at a lower opacity, (see attached image). This KILLS my workflow! It means I have to completely flatten my work and then resize, loosing all my groovy layers and the ability to go back into Camera Raw and make final tweaks while I make test prints and final decisions with the client by my side.
Even worse, when I apply the final print sharpening and flatten the file to send out, the edge transparency issue is compounded, and the sharpening adds an ugly halo around the whole image, BLAH!
What I need is a way for Smart Objects with the exact same pixel dimensions as the file to lock their edge pixels at the current opacity when resizing. In other words, I need Photoshop to treat the Smart Object as a true Background Layer for certain purposes, while still being able to go back into Camera Raw as I like. I notice the ability to lock transparency is gone on Smart Objects, which I'm sure is necessary for compositing, but not for what I'm doing at all.
Is there anyway this can be done in the current CS5 or 5.5 (haven't upgraded yet) that I'm simply missing? Can anyone from Adobe confirm that this is something you'll look into for me?
Thanks so much, absolutely loving Adobe products these days, you guys rock!
Best,
-B

I'm not going to say anything about the abysmal rendering of Vector Smart Objects in CS6 because it'll be beating a dead horse but I can explain the issues you see with measurements after scaling.
The slightly disproportionate scaling and half-pixel shift of the centre is unavoidable when it happens because the resulting Smart Object/Vector Smart Object must measure an integer number of pixels in height and width and be perfectly aligned to the document pixel grid. That's true in CS5 and CS6.
Say a SO/VSO originally measures 102 x 103 pixels and you scale it by 50%. The Options bar may say the result is 51 x 51.5 px but the result will really be 51 x 52 px, and therefore the new height will really be 50.49% of the old height.
The original SO/VSO is an even number of pixels wide and an odd number of pixels high, therefore its centre will be halfway down a pixel. The 50%-scaled SO/VSO is an odd number of pixels wide and an even number of pixels high, therefore its centre will be halfway across a pixel.

Resizing a circular smart object in CS6 results in flat sides

Resizing a circular smart object in CS6 results in flat sides, whereas in CS5 the sides would remain rounded.
Both the images below were resized using Free Transform (Apple+T) and typing in a height of 88px for the dimensions of the circle. The dropshadow is a layer effect and the background is a solid colour.
This might not seem like a big deal to some people but for me it would mean I'd have to change my workflow and figure out a method of resizing to avoid the flat eges.
CS5:
CS6:
Any ideas?

I am able to replicate flat edges in both Photoshop CS5 and CS6 with the circular object occupying the full canvas, right to the edges, inside the smart object.
Photoshop CS5:
Photoshop CS6:
Here's the file if you want to look at it yourself:
http://Noel.ProDigitalSoftware.com/temp/RoundSmartObject.zip
Your workaround to getting square edges on downsized Smart Objects is always to leave a few pixels to spare around the edges of your Smart Object - i.e., don't trim it to the very edges.
-Noel

Smart objects "bleeding" colours when resized

Bit of a strange one, this. In Photoshop CS6, whenever I create a smart object with the intention of resizing it, whenever I shrink it, where one flat colour collides with another, it creates a really ugly "bleed" effect -- kind of the same effect you get when you take a small image and try to make it larger:
I've zoomed in on this particular part to show just how bad it looks. Particularly on the upper part of the forearm, see how it's got a sort of white "halo" before the black outline? It now looks like I drew a slightly darker outline around all the levels of shading, and it looks really bad, almost like a raised/chiselled effect.
Obviously it's not as noticeable when you zoom out, but it's definitely there. If it helps, I've noticed that the same thing happens when I just resize the whole image using "bicubic automatic", but when I select "bicubic / anything else", the bleed does not occur. It kind of makes the once-incredibly-useful smart object tool kind of pointless now.
This never happened with any other prior version of Photoshop which had smart objects, and I've only just got hold of CS6 a few days ago, so if there's a really obvious preference/setting or something that I'm missing, please let me know
Thanks in advance x

Smart Object resizing uses the image interpolation method that's set in Preferences > General. The default has changed from CS5 to CS6, and many people do not like the change.
CS5 is set to Bicubic by default.
CS6 is set to Bicubic Automatic by default. Automatic results in Bicubic Sharper when reducing pixel dimensions, and Bicubic Smoother when increasing pixel dimensions. Bicubic Sarper tends to oversharpen and create ugly artifacts such as the halo that's plagueing you.
Set the preference in CS6 to plain Bicubic to make it like CS5.
Also in CS6, Free Transform now has an independent control for interpolation when pixel layers are targeted. It is set to Bicubic Automatic by default, so set that to plain Bicubic, too.

Smart Object Masks resizing problems

I have encountered a problem with the masks I use on smart object layers resizing so that they only extend to the bounds of the image they are masking in photoshop cc. The problem occurring is that many times the mask is 1px too small, and leaves a hairline border of the masked image visible. This seems to be happening when the smart object is saved/updated or resized. One work around is placing this smart object in a group and then masking that group, but this is not an ideal way to organize my files and is not always applicable. I am trying to see if leaving the mask unlinked stops this behavior, however this is still not an ideal fix. Is anyone else experiencing this or knows of a preferences setting/solution etc. to fix this issue? Thanks.

Can you post a file that exhibits the behavior? (Dropbox or another sharing site)

Resize smart object?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for