Resolving version conflict

1)Developer1,(Client as Client1)creted Hello.java file chked in now the version is 1.0
2)Developer2,(Client as -
) checked out synched edited Hello.java file chked in version is 2.0
Now both the developers checked out the version2.0 Devloper1 cheked in while developer2 got checkin conflict.
Assume that by some means he deleted client,he wont remeber what client name he has given. How to merge this conflict.

How can he check-in and get a version conflict if he doesn't have a client? Checking in is only possible if you have a client.
Message was edited by: Pascal Willemsen

Similar Messages

Version conflict in PI QA system

Hi All,
We are facing version conflict issue in QA system.
We transported a Mapping object from Dev to QA and after transporting it is giving Version conflict at QA.
This thing happen because some user has edited mapping program at QA level and activated .
We thought of transporting a deleted object first then the latest active version. But my doubt is that when we transport the same mapping program with same name PI will bring back object along with its history.
Can anyone having any idea about how to resolve this conflict.
Regards,
Navneet

Hi Ninu,
Thanks.
We activated the conflicting version from conflict tab and then transported the dummy changes from DEV to QA to verify it wont give version conflict any more.
it worked fine and conflicting version which we activated at QA considered as latest version for transport.
Regards,
Navneet

Why does Version Conflict occur?

Dear Experts,
I made a change in my DEV box for a mpping and transported it using CTS+ to both QA and PRD. No changes were made directly in either QA or PRD boxes. I have resolved the conflict by choosing the imported version.
However, I would like to know why did this conflict happen? Is there any other reason than the manual change on the object in QA or PRD, cos here that is ruled out.
Please suggest.
Thanks and Regards,
Merrilly

I do not think I did anythin of that sort anywhere.
Any other suggestions..
Thanks and Regards,
Merrilly

Version conflict resolution failure - catch 22

Hi,
I have a situation where I am trying to delete a DIRECTORY object (a receiver determination for example), but when I attempt to activate the change list a version conflict is reported.
When I attempt to resolve the conflict through the editor, I always get a 'MERGE RELATION IS NULL' error and cannot resolve the conflict and therefore cannot delete the object.
I am using SP 13.
Any help will make me VERY happy !
Cheers,
Guy

Hi,
Use TCODE : SXMB_IFR then Exhange Infrastructure Browser Will Display then
GoTo--> Administration by using PISUPER or XISUPER ->select ID->Select Administration of Locks and Caches -> Select Lock Overview>Delete if ur userid is display.
Then Refresh Cache once.
Plz allot points if u satisfy with the answar....
With Regards,
Mahesh

Resolving calendar conflicts

My question refers to syncing Outlook with a BB 9800 using BB Desktop Software 7.1.
Since doing my last sync, I changed some calendar items on the PC and the same ones in a different way on the BB.
When I now do a sync, all of these items show up as conflicts. When I used BB Desktop Software 6 in the past, I was able to look at each conflict sererately and decide to keep either the BB version of the change, or the PC version. By way of example, lets assume I have 10 conflicts. With BB Desktop Software 6, I could say that for 3 of them sync the BB value onto the PC and for the other 7 of them sync the PC value onto the BB.
Is there any way to do this with BB Desktop Software 7.1?

Sometimes you have to solve "sub-conflicts" (for lack of a better term) in order to resolve other conflicts. From your screen shot, it looks like you can resolve some of the conflicts. Once you get those resolved, maybe you can resolve the others.
There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines

LV2013 hangs on Resolve Load Conflict Dialog

Hi,
I've noticed that LV2013 hangs on Resolve Load Conflict Dialog on certain situations. I noticed this recently with the CDL API but I have seen this before in other circumstances not related to that API.
I have newest versions of CVT v3 and CDL APIs installed along with other Current Value Table related APIs like STM, CIE, CCC.
One way to reproduce this is by creating a new VI and placing "CDL Start Data Logger.vi" to the block diagram and creating a constant to the Tag List input. After this place "CDL Example_Advanced.vi" to the same block diagram. The resolve load conflict dialog appears. Now, if you wait for a couple of seconds before choosing the correct VI to be loaded, you'll see a new loading/search window. It says it is trying to load "...\LabVIEW 2013\resource\Framework\Providers\API\mxLvGetFilePathBatch.vi" but it never completes. When you try to stop or close the window for a couple of times, nothing happens or LabVIEW crashes. Most of the time I've had to end LabVIEW.exe from Task Manager.
If you quickly select the correct item from the list and press "Load with Selected" this doesn't happen.
Attached is a screenshot of the situation and crash report.
Has anyone else seen such behaviour?
-Matti
Attachments:
Capture.PNG ‏91 KB
crash report.png ‏70 KB

Matti_Autioniemi wrote:
Hi,
I've noticed that LV2013 hangs on Resolve Load Conflict Dialog on certain situations. I noticed this recently with the CDL API but I have seen this before in other circumstances not related to that API.
I have newest versions of CVT v3 and CDL APIs installed along with other Current Value Table related APIs like STM, CIE, CCC.
One way to reproduce this is by creating a new VI and placing "CDL Start Data Logger.vi" to the block diagram and creating a constant to the Tag List input. After this place "CDL Example_Advanced.vi" to the same block diagram. The resolve load conflict dialog appears. Now, if you wait for a couple of seconds before choosing the correct VI to be loaded, you'll see a new loading/search window. It says it is trying to load "...\LabVIEW 2013\resource\Framework\Providers\API\mxLvGetFilePathBatch.vi" but it never completes. When you try to stop or close the window for a couple of times, nothing happens or LabVIEW crashes. Most of the time I've had to end LabVIEW.exe from Task Manager.
If you quickly select the correct item from the list and press "Load with Selected" this doesn't happen.
Attached is a screenshot of the situation and crash report.
Has anyone else seen such behaviour?
-Matti
I followed these steps exactly, and while I got load warnings about changing dependencies dropping both nodes, I did not get a resolve conflicts dialog. Is there anything different you are doing? My steps -
1) Quick Drop CDL Start Data Logger (Load Warning pops up about new path)
2) Dismiss load warning
3) Create constant from the Tag List terminal
4) Quick Drop CDL Example Advanced (Load Warning pops up)
5) Dismiss load warning
6) no hang
Thanks for the report IDs,
Jeff Peacock
Product Support Engineer | LabVIEW R&D | National Instruments

Version conflicts and similarities..

is it that supposing i have a version of Dev2000 Ver6 then i
have to have the same version of Designer2000 ie Ver6 only?
or else there will be a version conflict or probably the product
might not install??
I have Oracle 8i Personal Edition.
Dev2000 Ver 6
Des2000 Ver 2.1
but Des2000 fails to install in the ORACLE_HOME directory after
Dev2000 is installed.

You are a very astute person, jdhore! Thank you very much!
q ~ $ pacman -Syu
:: Synchronizing package databases...
testing is up to date
core is up to date
extra is up to date
community is up to date
unstable is up to date
archlinuxfr is up to date
gianvito is up to date
archlinux.pl is up to date
lnf is up to date
tango is up to date
:: Starting full system upgrade...
:: Replace bluez-libs with testing/bluez? [Y/n] n
:: Replace gtk-engines with gianvito/gtk-engines-svn? [Y/n] n
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...
Targets (4): ncurses-5.6-8 ntfs-3g-1.2812-1 qt-4.4.1-3 xine-lib-1.1.15-2
Total Download Size: 23.46 MB
Total Installed Size: 76.40 MB

Possible version conflict, sending purchase order to SUS in MM-SUS scenario

We are currently trying to get the MM-SUS scenario working. In this
scenario, we create a purchase order in the ERP/MM system. The
purchase order is then transferred into SUS via XI/PI.
After creating a purchase order in the MM system, the purchase order
reaches the SUS system, but then errors-out in the SUS system upon
posting. The specific error is paraphrased as follows:
No interface action for sender or receiver found (from Trace)
PARSE_APPLICATION_DATA
CX_ST_MATCH_ELEMENT
System expected the element http://sap.com/xi/SAPGlobal20/Global;
PurchaseOrderRequest
We suspect a version conflict. The SUS version is 7.01. The XI/PI
system is version 7.11.
Can you confirm or rule-out a version conflict?
The Integration Builder scenario we are using is Plan
Driven Procurement with Supplier Enablement.
We have tryed many variations in Integration Builder, but all
produce errors in SUS. The test tool in Integration Builder also shows errors
for certain message types. The message type ORDERS.ORDERS02
needed to be added manually, and did not come along with the scenario.
Edited by: Bill Guderian on Mar 19, 2010 4:53 PM

Any clue from here.
Note 936003 - ERS Invoice causes conversion error within SRM
When the SRM system attempts to process an ERS Invoice sent from the MM backend, a PARSE_APPLICATION_DATA CX_ST_DESERIALIZATION_ERROR fault is thrown.
Other terms
CX_ST_DESERIALIZATION_ERROR PARSE_APPLICATION_DATA SUS SRM EBP ERS Invoice XI Exchange Infrastructure Mapping
Reason and Prerequisites
This error will occur when the IDOC does not have a VPREI value; it is the result of an error within the divide logic of the XI mapping operation. This operation is performed within the XI system. A calculation of NETWR/MENGE is performed; however, the result is not properly formatted. As such, 72.30/10 produces a result of 7.2300002. This value is too long for the inbound SRM proxy and hence the error is thrown.
Solution
The solution to this problem is to add a FORMATNUM function within the XI mapping operation. This restricts the result to 2 decimal places, which adheres to the definition of the inbound proxy.
Step by step directions on how one implements the FORMATNUM function are as follows:
1. Log into the XI system with SAPGUI
2. Start the Integration Builder:Design tool (for steps on how to do this, review the steps below):
    a. Run transaction sxmb_ifr
    b. This will cause a browser to come up. Select the Integration Repository link
3. In the left pane, select the Objects tab
4. Navigate to the SAP SRM SERVER ' SAP SRM SERVER 5.0 ' http://sap.com/xi/SRM/SupplierEnablement/Global --> Mapping Objects --> Message Mappings folder
5. Double-click on MM2SUSInvoice
6. The right pane will display the mapping object
7. Select Edit mode
8. In the box that contains the output (Message Type: InvoiceRequest), navigate to InvoiceRequest ' Invoice ' Item ' Price ' NetUnitPrice
9. Double-click on the Amount element and you should see the mapping, represented graphically in the bottom pane
10. In the status line of the graphical editor, select Arithmetic from the list box:
11. To the right of the listbox, scroll until you see the FormatNum function
12. Click on FormatNum, which will cause the function to be added to the graphical editor. You may drag the box as desired
13. Select the connection that binds the if/then/else to the Amount box by grabbing the arrow within the input of the Amount
14. Release the drag of the connection while over the input to the FormatNum box. This will reassign the output of the if/then/else to the input of FormatNum
15. Create a connection between the output of the FormatNum box and the input of the Amount box. You accomplish this by clicking within the output and releasing within the input (respectively).
16. Save the modified mapping object
17. Activate the changes
    a. In the left pane, select the Change Lists tab
    b. Navigate to the Standard Change List entry
    c. Right-click the Standard Change List entry and select Activate
    d. Select only MM2SUSInvoice if more than one item is available, and press the Activate button
18. This will complete the required modification.

File Transport: Version conflict.

Hi,
I have a doubt on a particular scenario while transporting object from QA to PRD using File transport.
I have exported a tpz file say 1.tpz from QA with say the following objects
Obj_1(ver 1.0)
Obj_2(ver 1.0)
Obj_3(ver 1.0)
Now before this 1.tpz is imported in PRD few more changes happend to Obj_3 and I exported again a file say 2.tpz
Now this 2.tpz has only Obj_3(ver 2.0)
Now the basis has by mistake Imported this 2.tpz file before importing the 1.tpz file. SO in my PRD the object Obj_3 is existing with a advance version i.e 2.0
Now my doubt is can we Import 1.tpz now in PRD and then again import 2.tpz ?
I am having a feeling that we will definately get in version conflict. Even if I ignore the warning during transport and go ahead with this procedure of importing 1.tpz and then 2.tpz again, will it impact my scenarios.
I am lookign for a quick suggestions.
Regards,
Rahul.

Hi Rahul,
If you import V1 file first & later V2, it will not impact on your scenarion & you wil be able to see latest object in PRD.
But V2 is already imported so import of V1 may not be successful.
You may generate a new export if possible & transport this. It should include all object with their lastest version.
Regards
Sushil

The "use a class customization to resolve this conflict" error

Hello,
I see most questions in this forum are unanswered, but here goes:
I must be exceptionally thick, because in spite of finding several hits when searching for this issue, i still don't understand how to solve it:
In the WSDL/schemas provided by a service provider, there are several elements with the same name but in different namespaces, that, when processed with wsimport, generate java classes with the same name but different packages. however, when trying to compile these, wsimport throws the error:
[ERROR] A class/interface with the same name "com.xyz.CustomerLoyalty" is already in use. Use a class customization to resolve this conflict. line 2853 of file:/C:/OTA_TravelItineraryReadPNR1.0.5RS.xsd
[ERROR] (Relevant to above error) another "CustomerLoyalty" is generated from here. line 434 of file:/C:/MyTypeLibrary_v.1.0.6.xsd
This only happens, of course, if i choose to provide the package i want the classes in, with the -p option. not otherwise.
apparently, i have to create an external binding file (don't want to embed into someone else's wsdl) to resolve this - so first question is:
1. what should the binding file contents look like?
2. There are several such classes which are "duplicates". so would there need to be an entry for each such class? this might get pretty tedious - is there any other solution at all?
Somewhere, i saw a -B option that could be passed to the jaxb compiler which eliminates this error, but i can't find that link anymore. is that an obsolete option?
Thanks,
Nilesh

http://download.oracle.com/javaee/5/tutorial/doc/bnbbf.html

Resolve Library Conflict

Is there a Boolean or function to set "resolve library conflict" to automatically replace? I've searched addItem and Paste, but I'm still given the prompt
[ discussion moved to Flash Pro General Forum ]

What you're describing would happen if you are dragging from
the library of one Flash document to the stage of another Flash
document. The library can only have one copy of a symbol with a
given name. Make sure that you've clicked on the stage of the one
you want to drag to, in order to see its library.
It's a good idea to always name symbols you make, rather than
leaving it at the default "Symbol 1", etc. If you don't change the
name you would be more likely to run into this problem.

XI 3.0 Version Conflict after SP 10 import

My XI 3.0 integration builder shows a version conflict for IDOC adapter meta data after we have implemented support package 10.
What needs to be done ?

Hi Peter,
We have this issue as well. not sure it is too much of an issue though.
Cheers
Colin

Version conflict while targeting a vi to RT engine

When i am targeting a vi to Labview RT engine the message "Version Conflicts between Host Labview and RT engines" is coming.
I am using a CFP-2100 and want to run a vi on it. (No PC should be connected with it)
After targetting how will i execute it on CFP? is it automatically executable?
Please reply me
--Alok Trivedi
Pune
-AL☼K

Thanx for replying me so soon.
I am still stucked with the problem.
I have Labview 7.0 installed on my computer and where i am making a vi which is to b loaded into CFP - 2100.
Here are other versions i am using.....
Field point VI manager 3.1.0
Field point Drivers 5.1.0
Data socket for Labview Real Time 4.2
Labview Real Time 7.1
NI-Irda RT 1.0.1
NI-Serial RT 2.5.4
NI-VISA 3.2
NI-Watchdog 2.1.2
When i switch the execution target to RT engine for remote device and enter the machine IP address it shows me "Version Conflict while targeting a VI to RT engine".
I talked to Rahul about this and he well told me how to repair version conflicts between Host machine and RT engine. I went to remote machine and by right clicking on "software" installed all the versions to remote machine according to the host machine.
the interesting thing is here it's not showing any version mismatch all the versions shown above are same as the host machine......but whenever i try to target the execution to RT engine it shows the version conflict.
now what all questionis running in my mind are :
1. Why the version conflict is occuring?
2. If I get succeed to targeting the execution of vi onto RT engine how would i install it to CFP, if i just copy and paste it via FTP how will it know what vi is to run? i think we'r missing some way to "install" the vi into CFP.
3 What is "RT Communication wizard for".......why it makes 3 other vi's....
4. what are the total ways to run a vi onto CFP
Waiting for your reply...
thanks again
-Alok Trivedi
Pune
-AL☼K

Version conflict between XE's ODP and VS2005/ODT's ODP

Suppose you've just built an application with VS2005, .NET Framework 2.0, and Oracle Developer Tools for Visual Studio .NET with Oracle10g Release 2 ODAC 10.2.0.2.20 which uses Oracle.DataAccess.dll version 2.102.2.20. You want to be able to run the application on a client machine that has an Oracle XE database installed locally. Perhaps you even require that the client machine runs the Oracle XE Client. Unfortunately, even with both there seems to be a version conflict regarding Oracle.DataAccess.dll. Can anyone say what are the best practices for such a situation?

Situation:
1) Oracle XE (database with/without client) installs with the following two files in the <ORACLEXE_SERVER_HOME>/BIN directory:
Oracle.DataAccess.dll v10.2.0.100 (for .NET Framework 1.0)
OraOps10.dll v10.2.0.100 (for .NET Framework 1.0)
2) Applications built with VS2005, .NET Framework 2.0, and Oracle Developer Tools for Visual Studio .NET with Oracle10g Release 2 ODAC 10.2.0.2.20 use Oracle.DataAccess.dll v2.102.2.20 (for .NET Framework 2.0).
3) The client machine will be missing the following two files vital to the application: Oracle.DataAccess.dll v2.102.2.20 (for .NET Framework 2.0), OraOps10w.dll v2.102.2.20 (for .NET Framework 2.0). These two files can be found on the development machine in the <ORACLE_ODAC HOME>/odp.net/bin/2.x and <ORACLEODAC _HOME>/bin directories, respectively.
Action:
When installing the application on the client's machine, place copies of the two missing files into the client's <ORACLEXE_SERVER_HOME>/BIN directory, overwriting the existing Oracle.DataAccess.dll v10.2.0.100 (for .NET Framework 1.0).
Result:
The application performs as expected.
My immediate concern is that the client may object to replacing the existing Oracle.DataAccess.dll v10.2.0.100 (for .NET Framework 1.0). What are the best practices for such a situation?

How do I correct version conflicts between host and RT engine?

I was running LabVIEW RT7.0 on a host PC (WinXP) and PXI-8145 system. I installed LV7.1 and LVRT7.1 on the host. However, the software versions in MAX still report as 7.0
I would like to upgrade to 7.1 on my 8145-RT. I cannot run 7.1 on the host and target the 7.0 RT engine (results in version conflict). Version 7.0 is installed on C:, but 7.1 is installed on D: due to space.
How can I get MAX to recognize my latest version (which should allow my to download it to the PXI)?
Thanks.
Laine

Thank you for the response.
C:\RT Images contains only a single folder for NI-PAL
However, I backed it up and copied the RT Images folder from D:, but still the same effect (MAX thinks 7.0 is the latest LabVIEW version).
D:\RT Images\LabVIEW\7.0 contains subfolders and install scripts (e.g., 7002.rts)
D:\RT Images\LabVIEW\7.1 contains subfolders but no install scripts. Also, there are many fewer files in these subfolders than in the 7.0 folder. I'm worried about trying to manually install from the 7.1 folder.
Any other suggestions? Thanks.
Laine

Resolving version conflict

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for