Response status has number of values different from request

Hi,
I'm getting the following message when I try to refresh a worksheet from a workbook.
"Response status has number of values different from request"
Has anyone encountered this message? what does this mean?
I'm using SmartView 11.1.2.1.103 on HFM 11.1.2.1.103 environment.
Thanks in advance,
Ram

Try removing external calculations (/$C$1) and see if the error message changes.

Similar Messages

  • Assignment field value different from sort key

    Dear Forum,
    I notice in the customer line item, the assignment field value different from sort key.
    sort key for customer i maintain as doc number + fiscal year, but i notice some line item's assignment is not this information.
    for example, billing posting. some customer line item assignment is document + fiscal year but some are delivery number in assignment field. no changes made in log file.
    may i know why?
    thanks

    dear,
    as i did mention, customer master sort key no change and in the same customer line item, assignment field which carry delivery number also no change log.
    may i know where to see the subsitution? i do not think that is due to substitution.
    thanks

  • In the info bar at the bottom of the iphoto window, why is the number of items different from the total

    In the info bar at the bottom of the iphoto screen, why is the number of items different from the total?

    What version of iPhoto and system are you running? What mode are you in, i.e. Events, Photos?
    If it's the Photos mode the number at the bottom will represent the number of photos displayed in that mode or the number of photos selected in that mode. The number will match the number next to the photos mode only when there are no photos in that mode that are selected. 
    If you click on the Events icon and then back on the photos icon the numbers should match.
    OT

  • IO 229 - Batch for serial number 1234 (BBB) differs from document batch AAA

    Hello All,
    We use batch management for serialized materials only at our central plant. For all other plants, there is no batch control. Sometimes we need to return materials back to the central plant but with a different batch number.
    When we do two step stock transfer 303 / 305, we receive the following error message if we don't use the original batch number.
    "IO 229 - Batch for serial number 1234 (BBB) differs from document batch AAA".
    However, when we use one step plant to plant stock transfer 301, there is no error message. The batch number is also updated correctly in IQ02.
    I wonder if there is any configuration to use 303 / 305 with different batch numbers.
    Thanks,
    Hakan

    Thanks Arminda.
    64044 recommends to use 309 to change the batch, which works but this is an additional step.
    Currently 1 step plant to plant transfer i.e. 301 doesn't require this additional step. It updates the batch information with no problem.
    Is there any configuration option to change the behavior of 305, so that we don't have to do an additional movement?

  • People I call see a number that is different from ...

    Hi,
    Friends of mine are telling me that they are seeing a phone number that is different from my number when I call them. This is a new development that started after my last payment. Why is this happening, and how can it be corrected?
    Cheers,
    Carl

    Your Skype number is displaying differently on your caller ID?
    I'm also having the same issue, for weeks now.
    Either it would say I'm calling from a private number, or a number completely diffferent than the phone number I'm paying for.
    Here's what you do to fix it:
    Step 1: Log into your Skype account here: https://secure.skype.com/account 
    Step 2: On the Call Phones tab, click the Caller identification link, then click select a pre-saved number (to change it back to normal, or enter a new number, i.e your own cell phone number to be displayed)
    Step 3: Choose your Online Number from the drop-down list and Save. Your Online Number is now set as your Caller ID.
    ^Problem solved.

  • Remove a name/value pair from request

    Hi, guys:
    I am trying to programmatically remove a name/value pair from
    request in my jsp file. For example, if I have a path like
    the following:
    http://localhost:8080/mysampleweb/initpage?isHome=true
    If I want to remove "isHome=true" and produce the following
    path:
    http://localhost:8080/mysampleweb/initpage
    Is there a way to do it?
    regards,

    I think you can use respose.sendRedirect(request.getRequestURI())

  • GR value different from actual value in limit PO

    Experts,
    We created a limit PO for $100. GR and invoice was done for $80. However the limits tab in PO shows actual value as $85!
    Why this difference of $5? ($85 - $80)
    Regards

    Hi,
    Is the value of EKBE-REFWR = RSEG-WRBTR for your PO and invoice? If yes, then what you are seeing is not an error. The values are correct.
    The 'Actual value' in the PO displays the sum of the invoiced amount referred to the PO/item (EKBE-REFWR / EKBE-REFWR).
    But the displayed 'Value in local curr' in the PO's history for each invoice's item (EKBE-WRBTR) is not the invoice item's amount, it includes the following 4 parts:
    1. Invoice item's amount
    2. Non-Deductible Input Tax(NVV)
    3. unplanned Delivery costs
    4. Cash discount amount
    So the 'actual value' in the PO cannot be the same as the totoal invoiced value.
    Regards,
    Purnima.

  • How to register a  supplier with VAT number which is different from the  co

    We find it difficult to register a supplier as in the reference above. The supplier is Dutch but the VAT number is Italian. SAP system checks the VAT number and the country of origin and we cannot register the supplier. How can we do it?
    Regards

    Hi,
      U can maintain this data by clicking on CIN DETAILS tab of vendor master----
    >SALES TAX/SERVICE TAX.
    OR
    VENDOR MASTER-->CONTROL DATA>TAX INFORMATION---->TAX NUMBER.

  • I-cloud status different from info

    Hi,
    My Itunes match status on some songs is different from the the status I get when I click info:
    The songs are ripped from cd.
    Any idea how to get the correct icloud status?

    Ah, I see.
    That is a little odd. But I think I know what happened. Did you, perhaps, upgrade that particular track? Because if you did that would give it a "Kind" of "Matched AAC audio file." I have a handful of those in my library as well. As to why it has a status of "uploaded" ... I can only surmise that the resulting matched file that you downloaded has then been "uploaded." Although why is an interesting question.
    You could try removing the tracks from your library, and the cloud (but keep them on the HDD). Then readd them to the library and let the iTM process do it's thing. It will probably "match."

  • New positition number of PCR differs in Portal from SAP Backend

    Hi,
    There is a critical scenario in our MSS PCR form. Manager initiated a Poition transfer for an emplyee. After all approvals when we are opening the from in IQS23 it is showing a new position number which is different from when we click on Display form which opens in Portal.
    In brief the new position number is not same when we see it in SAP backend through IQS23 and when we see from Display Form Action link which takes us in Portal. And importantly this is happening with one user only.
    Can anybody help me on this urgently?
    Regards
    Chandu

    Hi Siddarth,
    Thanks for your reply. Yes we are using PCR forms and not HCM forms.
    Thanks
    Chandu.

  • How do I set the response status code for a request in ADF?

    For example:
    I have a page accessible like page.jspx?id=$ID, in which $ID identifies an object stored in a database. The user navigates to page.jspx?id=abc. abc does not exist or has been deleted. I wish to set the response status code to 404 for the page request, like, for instance, https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=abc does. How do I do this?
    PS: Changing the status code for subsequent partial submits on the page if the object is deleted while the user is on the page (e.g. if the user attempts to delete an already deleted object through a "Delete" button on the page) may also be desirable, but would probably not fit in as well with the ADF lifecycle or be as useful.

    Maybe I should be more specific about the current state of the code. It's something functionally similar in relevant portions to the following. For the purposes of this code, assume the ID maps only to a name, rather than a more complicated object:
    page.jspx looks like:
    <?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
    <jsp:root xmlns:jsp="http://java.sun.com/JSP/Page"
         xmlns:f="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core"
         xmlns:af="http://xmlns.oracle.com/adf/faces/rich"
         xmlns:trh="http://myfaces.apache.org/trinidad/html" version="1.2">
         <jsp:directive.page contentType="text/html;charset=utf-8" />
         <f:view>
              <af:document binding="#{pageInitializer.dummyComponent}" title="#{pageData.name != null ? pageData.name : 'Object Not Found'}">
                   <af:outputText rendered="#{pageData.name != null}" value="#{pageData.name}" />
                   <af:outputText rendered="#{pageData.name == null}" value="No object was found at this URL." />
              </af:document>
         </f:view>
    </jsp:root>pageInitializer and pageData are pageFlow-scoped beans with the following code:
    class PageInitializer {
         @Inject private PageData pageData;
         @Inject private NameDao nameDao;
         @PostConstruct
         void initialize() {
              String name = nameDao.getNameById(FacesContext.getCurrentInstance().getExternalContext().getRequestParameterMap().get("id"));
              if (name != null)
                   pageData.setName(name);
              else
                   // TODO: Set status code 404
         public void setDummyComponent(UIComponent dummyComponent) {
         public UIComponent getDummyComponent() {
              return null;
    public class PageData {
         private String name;
         public String getName() {
              return name;
         public void setName(String name) {
              this.name = name;
    }The code initializes the data from the database through the initilaizer of a pageFlow-scoped bean with a dummy setter for the document because I read somewhere that that would work, and it seems to work, even though it seems hacky.
    Ideally, the code would render the 404 where it currently says (// TODO: Set status code 404). I realize this may not even be possible given the current architecture, because part of the response body has already been rendered, and I believe, but cannot find a source to cite, that the status code and headers cannot be set after the body has started being rendered. Is there any architecture that would get me this page's functionality (even if it's two JSPXs on the backend (which might be ideal)) and be able to render a 404 for an inexistent object?
    Edited by: 907794 on Feb 1, 2012 3:55 PM
    Edited by: 907794 on Feb 1, 2012 3:58 PM

  • Calculating based on a previous value when initial column values differ from the rest

    Let me preface this by saying I am new to the BO world. I'm trying to build a report/chart that tracks incoming loads. The first supply on hand value is pulled from the database and each successive supply on hand is based on the previous row's values.
    In the supply arriving column below, the iniital value differs from the rest using the formula:
         =If [Row Number]=1 Then [First Supply Arriving] Else [Supply Arriving]
    The supply on hand uses the same idea, but is where I'm running into problems. The first column value should be [Supply On Hand], easy enough. Each successive column value needs to follow this equation:
         Previous([Supply On Hand] (this won't always be [Supply On Hand] though, only for the second row essentially - problem 1) + Previous([Supply Arriving] (same as problem 1, where this is first supple arriving for the second row and then supply arriving moving forward) - [Usage Rate]
    If someone could help me in getting the calculation to pull the previous values correctly without making a ton of variables, I'd greatly appreciate it. We just upgraded to 4.1

    Yes, the supply on hand and the supply arriving from the previous row need added together. The usage rate, which is a constant is then subtracted from that. The result is the on hand total for the next day.
    For example:
    Date
    On Hand
    Arriving
    Usage Rate
    9/9/2014
    100,000
    250,000
    100,000
    9/10/2014
    250,000
    1,000,000
    100,000
    9/11/2014
    1,150,000
    0
    100,000

  • Cost Analysis result different from the cost estimate quantity structure re

    Hi
    Cost Analysis result different from the cost estimate quantity structure result in the same costing
    run why this happen like this. ( in CK40N costing run result -- Cost analysis -- double click on costing result it shows cost estimate quantity structure result values different from cost analysis value )
    Pls advice....
    Regards
    Kesharika

    It depends on your costing variant. For sample, if you take the price in the 1° price estimated on the material view and this data has changed, you can have a difference between the first and the second estimate.
    Perhaps also, it's just a definition of layout.
    And 3rd hypothesis : you are looking on component in the ck40n and the variant don't take in account your cost component and just the material price.
    Christophe

  • Generate dynamic DataTable for Values selected from SelectManyListBox

    I want to generate a datatable for values selected in a selectManyListBox,
    DataTable will have three columns
    1serial number
    2.values selected from listbox
    3.inputText for entering some data
    Plz guide me how can i do this...
    Thanx in advance!

    Check http://balusc.xs4all.nl/srv/dev-jep-dat.html how to use datatables.

  • To find number of parameter from request

    Freinds,
    Is there any way to find out number of parameter submitted from request object. But the constraint will be with out going through loop.
    Example
    int count = 0;
              Enumeration list = request.getParameterNames();
              while (list.hasMoreElements())     {
                   count++;
                   list.nextElement();
              }

    Can some body help me to resolve the warning created by this line
    ArrayList paramList = null;
    paramList = new ArrayList(Collections.list(request.getParameterNames()));CheckFilter.java:96: warning: [unchecked] unchecked conversion
    found : java.util.Enumeration
    required: java.util.Enumeration<T>
    paramList = new ArrayList(Collections.list(request.getParameterNames()));
    ^
    CheckFilter.java:96: warning: [unchecked] unchecked method invocation: <T>list(java.util.Enumeration<T>) in java.util.Collections is applied to (java.util.Enumeration)
    paramList = new ArrayList(Collections.list(request.getParameterNames()));
    ^
    CheckFilter.java:96: warning: [unchecked] unchecked call to ArrayList(java.util.Collection<? extends E>) as a member of the raw type java.util.ArrayList
    paramList = new ArrayList(Collections.list(request.getParameterNames()));

Maybe you are looking for