Restrict access to bid invitation cFolder documents
SRM Experts,
I have a requirement to restrict access to bid invitation cFolder documents.
Here is the scenario:
Buyer1 creates a bid invitation and a cFolder. We do not want any other buyers within our organization to access this bid invitation cFolder.
How can this be achived?
At this time, if a buyer (ex: Buyer2) has access to create a bid invitation or view a bid invitation, the system is automatically gives Buyer2 access to cFolder created by Buyer1.
This needs to be restricted, any advice would be appreciated.
Note: BADI BAdI BBP_CFOLDER_BADI is already deactivated in the system
Please let me know if you have any ideas.
Thanks
Hi,
You can restrict the access through Product categories in the PPOMA_BBP for each user .
So that he can create Bid invitation only to that product category..
please check this link
you can find the customization guide for Cfolders on
https://websmp202.sap-ag.de/~form/sapnet?_FRAME=CONTAINER&_OBJECT=011000358700007402242002E
Please check with SAP PLM consultant . You can controlled through Authorisation role
This is the role used :User
- Role name: SAP_CFX_USER
Better check with the above link
Regards
G.Ganesh Kumar
Similar Messages
-
Url for public tender/bid invitation?
Dear Gurus,
We are configuring public tender/ bid invitation document in our SRM server 7.01 (SRM 7 enhancement pack 1).
We have created a bid invitation document of type public. It has gone through approval and got published. We have not configured the system for decoupled bidding (bidding response from SUS available from SRM 7.01).
In which portal, the bid invitation will be published? is it the supplier portal or there will be separate portal link available for the same? Could you please give me a hint where to look for the public tender?
Secondly, who will get to see the public tender? Are only the suppliers present in the SRM system or any supplier who is even not registered with the client can see the public tender?
Any inputs will be highly appreciated.
Thanks and regards,
Ranjan
Ranjan SutradharDear Ranjan,
Your requirement can be achieved with the press tendering(paper add or advertisement on company website), where the client will be giving the details related to the Bid invitation so that the suppliers can view them and if interested they can register themselves to access the bid invitation and proceed with the follow on activities for response submission.
As you have mentioned , you can publish a link in the client main page referring to the Bid invitation with details and asking the interested suppliers to registered themselves via supplier registration url , so that a corresponding business partner will be generated for them in the SRM system and at the same time purchaser will be notified with the interested suppliers.
Once the supplier is registered, then they can access the bid invitation with there login credentials.
But at no point of time suppliers without registering in the SRM system can access the Bid invitation.
Hope this will answer your query.
Thanks & Best Regards,
Rahul -
Issue in navigating to cfolder from Bid Invitation in the specific instanc.
Hi,
We have an issue in cfolder, when we navigate from Bid Invitation after creation of instance for cfolder through the link in "Document" view..
Instead of opening directly into the specific instance of Bid Invitation in the cfolder, system open ups in u201CHome Menuu201D in the "Competitive "Scenariou201D with all the List of Bid Invitation instance visible in the cfolder.
The user have to search the Bid Invitation Instance in cfolderr to upload the documents. Whereas we require that the system should navigate directly into the Bid Invitation Instance of cfolder.
Kindly help me in resolving the issue, have I missed some config. in the cfolder .
With Regards
ManojThere are a couple of things you should change.
First of all, you do not need a Proxy Service with Email transport. A Proxy Service with email transport is created to receive an email from a SMTP server, which is why it is one way only (you wont be sending a message response to SMTP server for an email received from it).
Your requirement is to send out an email from OSB, you will only need a Business Service with email transport for that.
You can call this business service from your main proxy using a Publish Action and set the subject field by adding Transport Headers in the Publish Action.
Main Proxy-->Email BS
If however, you want to have a common proxy in between to set the subject(may be so you can have that logic at one place and call it from multiple proxy services?), then you can create a Proxy Service with LOCAL transport. In this proxy service invoke the Email Business Service using a Publish Action and set the subject field by adding transport header. You can invoke this local proxy from your main proxy.
Main Proxy-->Local Common Proxy-->Email BS -
I am not able to see restricted bid invitations under vendor users.
I have created a restricted bid invitation and assigned couple of vendors to it. I have a user associated with each vendor with SAP_BBP_STAL_BIDDER role. When I release the bid, the vendor users are not able to see the restricted bids. However, I can see the public bid invitations.
Am I missing some configuration? Please let me know
-SurenDear Suren,
It sound like the bidder is not authorized to display the bid inv document, you can try to login from GUI.
Then open the "submit bid" transaction (Tcode BBP_QUOT), after that enter the bid inv number and start, then go to /NSU53, check if there's any authorization failed.After that add the needed authorization ,then try again.
regards,
w1n -
Best way to restrict access to documents (outside of the group or library level)
Hi, we're thinking of implementing SharePoint Server 2013 Standard Edition for our organization. Many of our employees are research scientists working on proprietary information. From the (admittedly little) I understand about SharePoint, if a user wants
to restrict access to a particular document to the 2 or 3 people with whom they're collaborating (and also have it not appear in the search results), they will have to email their power user to request that a new document library be created in which they can
store their documents. Is that correct? In this case, what is the best way to handle item-level permissions? Users absolutely want to have the freedom to restrict access to their documents themselves rather than being forced to go to their power user. Thanks.Hi,
Per my knowledge, if you want to restrict access to the documents to some users, then you need to have Manage Permissions permission to modify other users’ permission on the documents.
If you do not have the Manage Permissions permission, I recommend to ask the site administrator to create a workflow as below to remove the corresponding users’ permission on the documents which you uploaded. You can start the workflow on the document you
upload and then the permission of the users set on the workflow will be removed from the document.
Best regards.
Thanks
Victoria Xia
TechNet Community Support -
Follow-On Document - Bid Invitation
Hi,
Anybody knows how can I turn default this field "Follow-On Document" with the value "PO or Contract".
Every time when I try to create a Bid Invitation, this field show me up "PO" such default.
See the print of the screen: [SCREEN|http://geocities.yahoo.com.br/pedrosapmm/doc.jpg]
Tks,
PedroHi Pedro,
This works the other way. Please make sure that both the indicators are not selected. Then you will "Purchase Order and Contract" as default.
SPRO -> Supplier Relationship Management -> SRM Server -> Cross-Application Basic Settings -> Define Transaction Types -> BUS2200
and for all your BID transaction types (PO and Contract must be not be selected).
Hope this solves your problem.
Regards
Kathirvel -
Problem restricting access to additional document directory
Hi,
Plattform: Win2K + iPlanet 6sp6
I'm having a bit of a problem setting restrictions on an addtional document directory (the "manual" directory is a good example).
I have a couple of virtual servers.
I do not want to use .htaccess.
Is it at all possible ?
any pointers ?
Best wishes,
B.LIs it possible?Yes.
Any pointers?Umm. Use the "Restrict Access" screen to select the directory you want to restrict, and then set the permissions for it.
Without knowing what kind sof problems you're having we can't really make any recommendations.
Are you following the instructions in the Admin Guide? -
Subsequent Document for Bid Invitation - Dumpt
Hello SRM Seniors!
I had created a shopping cart and by this shopping cart I made a bid invitation.
Vendors send to me the quotations and the data and time finished. ok!
Now, I would like to transform my quotation in a purchase order or contract. How can I do this?
Take a look in this .ppt documento what I'm have doing: [Process|http://geocities.yahoo.com.br/pedrosapmm/soco02.ppt]
Thanks,
Pedro Marques
Edited by: Mr. Pedro Marques on Jun 27, 2008 7:22 PMHi,
Where can I accept the quotation in Bidder/Bids?
[Bidders/Bids|http://geocities.yahoo.com.br/pedrosapmm/bidinv_bidder.jpg]
[Basic Data|http://geocities.yahoo.com.br/pedrosapmm/basic_tab.jpg]
Where can I choice PO or Contract?
Follow-On Document was locked.
Thanks,
Pedro marques
Edited by: Mr. Pedro Marques on Jun 27, 2008 7:51 PM -
Sending documents for Bid Invitation
Hi All,
What type of documents can we send with Bid Invitation? What are the advantages using cFolders with Bid Invitations.
Thanks,
RaviHi,
Foll are the settings reqd:
--.define a LS for cFolders( you have to duplicate SRM LS if it is on the same server)
-->define an RFC destination for this system (even if same as SRM)
-->define a backend system of type cFolders in SRM SPRO
-->activate SICF cFolders service (with external alias)
Normally the collaboration area should be displayed in document tab in the Bid inv screen.
See these related links;
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/c1/c3fe3930a34b2ae10000000a114084/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_ppm400/helpdata/en/e7/1fc30727cd4ddeb7f6351416ebf591/frameset.htm
BR,
Disha.
Do reward points for useful answers. -
How to hide document fields in Bid Invitation
While creating Bid invitation I need to hide some fields e.g. Attachements, upload a document, description, button Search & Add. These fields are available under tab Header data -> Documents.
BADI 'BBP_UI_CONTROL_BADI' works to hide Bid Invitation Basic data, but not for above.
Can anybody let me know how to hide above fields.
Nilesh KumarHi,
I dont think there is any BADI/screen variant for this requirement.But yes,if any of the 2 are available in the std,ITS template changes should be avoided.
The foll are the screen variants available in SRM 5.0:
Item data overview in the invoice without purchase order reference: Screen variant BBP_IV_NON_PO; Method GET_SCREENVARIANT_INV
Item data overview in the invoice with purchase order reference: Screen variant BBP_IV, Method GET_SCREENVARIANT_INV
Item data overview in the confirmation: Screen variant BBP_CF; Method GET_SCREENVARIANT_CONF
Item data overview in the confirmation for time recording: Screen variant BBP_CF_TIMEREC; Method GET_SCREENVARIANT_CONF
Item data overview in the purchase order: Screen variant BBP_PO; Method GET_SCREENVARIANT_PO
Item data overview for contracts: Screen variant BBP_CTR_ITEMLIST; Method GET_SCREENVARIANT_CTR
Item data overview for selection of contracts: Screen variant BBP_CTR_ITEM_SELLIST; Method GET_SCREENVARIANT_CTR
Search results for changing/processing a purchase order: Screen variant BBP_SEARCH_PO_IN_PO; Method GET_SCREENVARIANT_SEARCH
Search results for entering an invoice and/or confirmation: Screen variant BBP_SEARCH_PO; Method GET_SCREENVARIANT_SEARCH
Search results for entering a purchase order: Screen variant BBP_SEARCH_SC; Method GET_SCREENVARIANT_SEARCH
Search results for displaying/processing a bid invitation: Screen variant BBP_SEARCH_BID; Method GET_SCREENVARIANT_SEARCH
Search results for displaying/processing a bid: Screen variant BBP_SEARCH_QUOT; Method GET_SCREENVARIANT_SEARCH
Search results for displaying/processing an auction: Screen variant BBP_SEARCH_AUC; Method GET_SCREENVARIANT_SEARCH
Search results for displaying/processing an invoice: Screen variant BBP_CHANGE_IV; Method GET_SCREENVARIANT_SEARCH
Search results for displaying/processing a confirmation: Screen variant BBP_CHANGE_CF; Method GET_SCREENVARIANT_SEARCH
Search results for entering/displaying/processing/status of a shopping cart: Screen variant BBP_SC; Method GET_SCREENVARIANT_SC
Worklist for Sourcing: Screen variant BBP_SOCO_WL; Method GET_SCREENVARIANT_SOCO
Work area in Sourcing: Screen variant BBP_SOCO_GA; Method GET_SCREENVARIANT_SOCO
Overview for the budget display: Screen variant BBP_BUDGET; Method GET_SCREENVARIANT_BUDGET
BR,
Disha. -
Bid Invitation Display not working in cFolder
Hi ,
I am using the cFolder application with SRM 5.5.
Now when I create a collaboration (while creating a bid invitation) a cfolder link is created.
When I enter in the cFolder application, there is a external reference tab available " Bid Invitatn XXXXXXXXXX Display".
If I click on this tab, it should open the same bid invitation, but currently its not working.
Can anybody suggest what is the expected behaviour of the system if I click on this tab? Any suggession regarding configuratiion which I probably have missed to make this tab working?
Rahulwrite to me for config doc
BR
Dinesh -
BADI to change the document Tendering Text of Bid Invitation
Hi Experts...
Im need a BADI to change the document Tendering Text of Bid Invitation. Anybody knows?
Thanks.
VictorHi,
You can use the badi "BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI" to chnage the value for the long text "Tendering text".
In the EXPORT table ET_LONGTEXT,just pass the text ID deatils and the new content for this text.
The text ID for the longtext "Tendering text" is "HTXT"(for header level) and ITXT(for item level).
BR,
Disha.
Do reward points for useful answers. -
Problem in creating follow-on document (RFQ) for a bid invitation.
Hi Experts,
We have an issue while creating follow-on document(RFQ) for a bid invitation.
Process is as follows :
We have a bid invitation and sent it to two vendors. After this, created two responses one is accepted and another one is rejected.
Now the accepted bid is ready to "Create follow-on Document(RFQ)". But when we do this, the bid with rejected vendor also including in the follow-on document. This should not be the case.
The follow-on document should include only the accepted bid, but not the rejected bid.
Could anyone tell me how to achieve this ?
Thank you very much in advance.As far as I understand, what you described is the standard behavior. ALL undeleted vendors are copied over to the follow-on RFQ regardless if their bids have been rejected or not. What you can do is to implement BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI for BUS2200 and explicitly remove the vendors which created rejected bids. Make use of the header field "copy_of_guid" to identify the originated RFQ.
-
How can I upload an attchament in a BID invitation / SRM
Hi everyone,
I need to create a new screen in bid invitation transaction that will upload a new attachment in the document.
Does anybody know how can I do this ?
Thanks,
OscarHi,
I am using the cFolder application with SRM 5.5
Now when I create a collaboration (while creating a bid invitation) a cfolder link is created,By accessing this link you can upload your documents.
For techincal config. pls search on this site.
Thanks & Rgards,
Sumit Pukale -
Buffer Table Not Up To Date Short Dump When Publishing Change Version of Bid Invitation
Hi experts,
We are running SRM 5.5 with Support Level 16.
We have a bid invitation for which a user is trying to publish a Change Version. This bid contains two bid outlines, with one line item in each bid outline:
ITEM 1: HIER (Bid Outline)
ITEM 2: Line Item
ITEM 3: HIER (Bid Outline)
ITEM 4: Line Item
However, upon clicking on the Check or Publish button, the system throws a CX_BBP_PD_ABORT exception short dump. The reason for the exception given in ST22 is "Buffer table not up to date".
Due to organisational system security restrictions, I am unable to copy-paste the dump from ST22, so I will be typing out some of the details here.
Transaction: BBP_BID_INV
Program: SAPLBBP_PDH
Screen: SAPLBBP_BID_INV_1000
Termination occurred in the ABAP program "SAPLBBP_PDH" - in "BBP_PD_ABORT". The main program was "SAPLBBP_BID_INV".
In the source code you have the termination point in line 73.
Active Calls/Events
(formatted below as "No: Type: Name")
24: Function: BBP_PD_ABORT
23: Form: ABORT
22: Form: ITMADM_UPDATE
21: Form: ITMADM_MAINTAIN_SINGLE
20: Form: ITEM_F_CHECK_FROM_WTAB
19: Form: ITEMLIST_F_CHECK
18: Function: BBP_ITEMLIST_CHECK
17: Form: PROCDOC_DB_CHECK
16: Form: PROCDOC_CHECK
15: Function: BBP_PROCDOC_CHECK
14: Form: SSIS_DOCUMENT_CHECK_COMPLETE
13: Form: STATUS_SET_AND_INTERNAL_SAVE
12: Form: PROCDOC_UPDATE
11: Function: BBP_PROCDOC_UPDATE
10: Form: CHANGE_VERSION_UPDATES_ACTIVE
9: Function: BBP_PDCV_UPDATE_ACTIVE
8: Form: PROCDOC_CHECK
7: Function: BBP_PROCDOC_CHECK
6: Function: BBP_PD_BID_CHECK
5: Form: FCODE_DOCUMENT_CHECK
4: Form: FCODE
3: Function: BBP_BID_PROCESS
2: Form: PROCESS
1: Module (PAI): PROCESS
The ABORT subroutine is being called in Step 22 (ITMADM_UPDATE), at the following line:
* parent guids have to be identical ...
if gt_itmadm-parent <> w_itmadm-parent.
perform abort.
endif.
Upon tracing the variable values in the ST22 dump, it appears the program terminates when processing line 3 (i.e. the second Bid Outline). It appears that the first Bid Outline processes fine.
In the iteration for Line 3, the dump provides that gt_itmadm-parent contains the GUID to the Change Version document header, whereas w_itmadm-parent contains the GUID to the original Bid Invitation document header, resulting in a mismatch and subsequently program termination.
We have tried to replicate this bid invitation in our Development environment, but when executing, both gt_itmadm-parent and w_itmadm-parent contain GUIDs to the Change Version document header, hence the program does not abort.
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
Best regards,
Kwong HowHi Janu,
For Note 1561750, I have looked at the Correction Details and observed that it makes changes to an IF-ELSE block, but will result in the same path of code execution as before. I.e., the Note changes the code from "IF a THEN b, ELSE c" to just "c", but according to my code trace, we are already executing the "ELSE c" block in its current state.
We will look further into Note 1877600. The unfortunate situation here is that since we are unable to replicate this issue in our Development/QA environment, and the Note description does not explicitly fit the situation we are facing, we need to be very sure that the Note can address the issue before bringing it into Production.
Otherwise, we will raise a message as suggested.
Thank you so much for your help!
Best regards,
Kwong How
Maybe you are looking for
-
How can I print without color?
How can I print without my color cartridge in my printer, I have a HP Deskjet 3510. I cant find only print in black in white in the setting on my printer.
-
Aperture Not Displaying Altitude Metadata from Camera
My camera records GPS data including Lat, Long and Altitude. When I import my images into Aperture 3.5.1, the metadata shows the Lat and Long information but Altitude shows up as 0m. I know for sure that my camera is recording the altitude informatio
-
I can't make/receive calls on days old iPhone 4. Just says Call Failed.
Same thing is happening with my girlfriend's 3Gs. The person being called hears half a ring then phone cuts out. I have all bars but when call fails bars all drop for a moment, then return. I've reset network settings and everything else. What the **
-
To split a table as two tables with equal no of records
Hi Everyone, I have a table with size of 100000 records which is reterieved from different tables thats why idx is not in a sequential order. for example idx 1 5 100 and so on i want to create two different tables with same number of records but i do
-
IPhone Home Screen Identifier?
Does anyone know if/what the identifier (variable) is for the iPhone homescreen? For instance on the BB the home screen was always 'bbhome'; is there anything like this on the iPhone? Thanks