Restrict the user by not proceeding to next slide

Hi,
I have created a Drag & Drop interactivity with Drag & Drop Interactivity wizard, I just wanted to restrict the user not to proceed to nextslide unless he/she completes the activity.
Can you please help me how do I do this?
Thanks,
Ajay

I have created drag & drop as you can see in the screenshot.
Here is my requirement:
1. I want to restrict the user not to proceed to next slide till he completes the drag & drop activity.
2. I want all the drag items to display all the time.
Thanks,
Ajay

Similar Messages

Restrict the user should not allow to select No Excise entry tab in MIGO

Hi
how to restrict the user should not allow to select No Excise entry tab in MIGO
if the material Excisable user can bale to select the No Excise entry tab in MIGO . my requirement .... if the Pop come Please enter Excise Invoice number and Excise Invoice Date user should not change the No Excise how to restrict pls advise me
@sakhi

These are the options provided by SAP keeping in mind Indian Scenario. Sometimes, vendor forget to send excise invoice copy with the material, in such case, you can select 'Only Part I'.
Even if you have maintain vendor excise details & material excise details (By mistake) in J1ID, system will throw an error message, excise invoice value is zero. In such case, we can select option 'No excise entry'.
Your requirement can't be fulfilled in standard way. Even if you go for any Z- developement, you will lose the option.

How to set the item property to restrict the user to not to copy from above

Hi Guru's,
I have a requirement like, There were two items on the form name email Id, Confirm email Id.
I have to ristrict the user to not to copy from email Id item.. make him/her to enter the value into confirm email id item field manually.
How to set the item property to restrict the user to not to copy from above item and paste it in this item.
Please help.
Thanks!!

Just an opinion here, but that is about the dumbest requirement I have ever seen.
I am always annoyed by web sites that ask me to enter my email twice. I ALWAYS copy the email address from the original entry and paste it into the second one.
People enter their email addresses so often, it takes a real klutz to not get it right. And what makes you think that if they enter it twice, that they won't enter it wrong both times anyway???

How to restrict the department to not user other departments' equipment?

Dear SAPIENTS,
How to restrict the department to not user other departments' equipment? If suppose any one creating order for equipment having different authorization group then system should not allow me to do this.
Regards,
Kaushal Rai

Kaushal Rai,
Use Authorization group for technical objects, create authorization gruops in IMG and assign the same to the Equipment master and block the other department with the same authorization group. For ristricting the authorization group to other departments after creating and assigning it to the equipment seek help from your BASIS team.
goto the below path for cerating the Authorization group:
IMG - PMCS - Master data in PMCS - Technical Objects - Define Authorization groups:
Here you define the authorization groups, after completion of this step go to the Equipment master in General Data tab page there is a feild Authourization Group, mention the respective authorization group and provide this Authorization gruop value to the respective user in the user role with the help of BASIS Team.
Regards,
Praveen.

How to restrict the users not to change receiving batch no. in 305 mov.type

Dear MM Guru,
We are using mov.type 303 & 305 for transferring the materials from one plant to another plant. t.code is MB1B (Non split valued item)
While receive the goods through 305 mov.type the user having the chance to change the receiving batch number. To control this changes, is there a way where we can restrict the users not to do the changes in receiving batch no. or can we do the GR with reference to the material document 303 mov.type.
Regards,
Sivanandan

Hi,
Generally there is a possibility to change the batch no. If you want to restrict it means go for enhancement. Use BADI to acheive this.In MB_MIGO_BADI you can set not to change the batch no. Hope it works. Thanking you.

How to restrict the user in MIRO for not modifying price

Hi All
My requirement is How to restrict the users in MIRO screen for not modifying Material Prices of only the for specific ROH types .
For example :
Valuation class             RM description
3021                             RM - A
3022                             RM - B
3024                             RM - C
when ever we procure the above Raw materials A,B and C and
the Quantity of each Raw material @ 10 units and value @ 1 INR for each unit
RM - A procured qty 10 @1 total price is INR 10
RM - B procured qty 10 @1 total price is INR 10
RM - C procured qty 10 @1 total price is INR 10
total price of PO is INR 30
when we received invoice material prices are assume it INR 1 is excess for each material.Now the invoice price for each RM has become INR 11.
in MIRO we want restrict the user to change the price from INR 10 to 11.
suggest the best possible ways to restrict in MIRO screen
Thanks & Regards
Mala

Dear:
                  Take help of ABABPER fo implement exit using INVOICE_UPDATE or MRMH0003 Logistics Invoice Verification: Revaluation/RAP exit. If this does not help then seek help of MM functional who will help you to find exit for the required task.
rEGARDS

How to restrict the user to change the project structure but not the documents?

Hi,
I have created one project assigning different users in Solution manger. I want to risitrict some of the users to change the project structure but simultaneously allwoing the project documents to be created, edited or deleted using solar01 under Project documentation tab. For that I have followed the steps provided in the follwoing link.
http://wiki.scn.sap.com/wiki/display/SM/Howto+Restrict+Changes+to+Project+Nodes+to+Assigned+Team+Members
I am able to restrict the users to change the project structure, but I am not able to allow access to the project documents. It gives me the message "You are not authorised to change the project". This fulfills my one of the requirements. But, Is there any way to restrict the user to change the project structure but not the documents?. Any help will be apperitiated.
Thanks,
Rutvik Uapdhyay.

Hi Rutvik,
Basically there are 2 different authorization role ...you should look for and customize as per requirement in Z* namespace.
role - SAP_SOLAR01_ALL
this take care of objects in Solar01 like tab access etc
role -SAP_SOL_KW_ALL
this takes care of entire documentation within solman
hope this helps
Regards
Prakhar

Restrict Standard User from not removing the COM-Addins registered under HKLM with Admin rights.

Hello,
I have developed a COM-Addin for word 2013 by VS 2013 and installed it under the HKLM with Admin rights. Now from an non-admin account, ie Standard User I'm able to uncheck that addin from the COM-Addins dialog and remove it also. Previously I have done the
same thing for word 2007 addins and if a non-admin user tries to uncheck it the warning "The
connected state of Office Add-ins registered in HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE cannot be changed" pops
up. But this is not happening for office 2013 apps(basically word, excel and powerpoint).
This is happening for all Add-Ins installed under HKLM.
How can a Standard User be restricted from unchecking and removing the Office Addins registered under HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE with same warning "The
connected state of Office Add-ins registered in HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE cannot be changed" in
a pop-up box?
Regards, Sayan

Hi,
The behavior is changed since Office 2010. Office 2010 and Office 2013 allows a standard user to turn a per-machine add-in off by unchecking the add-in in the COM Add-ins dialog.
To restrict Standard User from not removing the COM Add-ins, we can try to add the add-in to
the Group Policy option: List of managed add-ins in the Office Group Policy template.
Word for example, the policy is under:
User Configuration\Administrative Templates\Microsoft Word 2013\Miscellaneous
To enable this policy setting, provide the following information for each add-in:
In "Value name", specify the programmatic identifier (ProgID) for COM add-ins, or specify the file name of Word add-ins.
To obtain the ProgID for an add-in, use Registry Editor on the client computer where the add-in is installed to locate key names under HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Office\Word\Addins.
To obtain the file name of an add-in, click the File menu in the application where the add-in is installed. Click Options, click Add-ins, and then use the Location column to determine the file name of the add-in.
In "Value," specify the value as follows:
To specify that an add-in is always enabled, type 1.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Steve Fan
TechNet Community Support

How to restrict the user from Closing the PO when it is not matched yet

Hi,
Actually PO is finally closed in lines level without matching. Now the problem is how to restrict this in future so that the user can not finally close it when it is not matched.
Thanks
Kavya

Kavya,
Check the setup of Line Type . Check for Receipt Tolerance on the Line Type . It should not be 100%
Please let me know if you have any questions
Thanks
Navin

Need to raise a restriction that user can not put multiple PO references in PO Number field in Sales Order.

Hi,
reference to subject we need a restriction that user can not put different PO reference within an Order. One Sale Order should have one PO reference at Header and Line's of the sales order. Currently what is our issue that all the sales order are created by Quotes from quoting module. Whatever the line items come from quotes into sales order having no PO Number reference with them but when user completing the sales order user puts the PO reference at Sales Order Header which can not be linked or passed on those line items who captured from quotation. Due to this PO reference value difference between Lines and Header system generates multiple AR invoices based on unique PO Number references within an order.
we need single PO reference per sales order. How can we restrict this if line level PO number reference is different from Header PO number reference that user can not proceed further?
Regards
Kaleem A. Bhatti

Dear Zakir,
Thanks a lot for your favorable response. The query is solved now by defaulting rules.
Regards
Kaleem A. Bhatti

Hr_maintain_masterdata showing an infotype that the user does not have auth

subject: hr_maintain_masterdata showing an infotype that the user does not have authorisation for
Hi all,
I've a user account that's meant to perform staffing, based on the actual HR role. The system is also set up with an infogroup that contains infotypes 0000, 0001, 0006, 0185, XYZ and other infotypes; XYZ representing an actual infotype. The HR role is not supposed to have this infotype XYZ.
When PA40 is used, infotype XYZ will be skipped, as the user account do not have authorisation for it. I could then proceed to create the record.
When the fm: hr_maintain_masterdata is used, I was prompted that I do not have authorisation for infotype XYZ.
I have setup my fm with the mininum amount of values, as indicated below.
I did not populate a table for "proposed_values" so the infotypes called were due to the actions of the infogroup.
fm: hr_maintain_masterdata
pernr = 01234567
massn = 01          (new staff)
actio = INS          (insert record)
tclas = A          (master record)
begda = 01.09.2010
endda = 31.12.9999
werks = myCompanyPlant
dialog_mode = 2     (online)
luw_mode = 1          (commit, if no errors encountered)
no_existance_check = X
Q. Is there any way to let the function module call the infotypes, with authorisation checks, as what PA40 is doing?
Your guidance would be appreciated.
Thank you,
James Wong

A behaviour that has been observed was that, after infotype 0185 was saved, the function module throws me back to infotype 0000, citing, "No authorization to maintain XYZ exists". Data that I had populated to the screen, either via the FM or by manual input were cleared. If I skip the next 4 screens, I'll arrive at the Infotype after XYZ, with the data populated. Subsequent infotypes also have their data filled in.
Once I complete the sequence, the personnel record will be created. Upon examination, the frist 4 screens that were skipped in the 2nd pass contains data that were entered in the 1st pass.
My question, as posted in the original post, is why infotype XYZ is triggered by the function module, as the staffing account does not hae access for it. If I repeat the process using PA40, the infotype is skipped accordingly.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thank you,
James Wong,

How to restrict the user input textfield to an Integer?

Hello there;
Here is my problem, and i need your help.
I have a mssql 2005 server as my back end database;
I have designed a web application from which i can load a specific table in my database.
One of my table column is of integer type and i want to restrict the user to only entered an integer in the textfield.
I have try the integer converter from the "converters" section of the pallete. The result is that its actually restrict the user input to be an integer, but i can't load the database, obtaining a java.lang.Int error message.
Next i have tried using int theid=int.parseInt........ but i am receiving a syntax error of the type cannot find symbol parseInt.
I can't just work this out!
Could anybody help please.

As has been stated in previous replies you can check that the value in the TextField is parseable as an Integer by using Integer.parseInt(fieldVariable.getText()). However, you can also restrict what characters can be entered into the text field, like so:
Assume your field variable is textField1 then the KeyTyped event for the text field:
private void textField1KeyTyped(java.awt.event.KeyEvent evt) {
if (evt.getKeyChar() < '0' || evt.getKeyChar() > '9') {
evt.consume();
}will only allow the numeric characters (i.e., 0-9) to be typed into the field. Keep in mind that in this case the backspace, delete, home, arrow, etc, keys will not delete characters, move the cursor, etc, so if you want those you have to test for them as well.

Restricting the user to access only one view in or database

A user wants to create a database link , so that he can view one of our views. We want to restrict permission, so that he can access only that view, and not any of our tables. What is the best way to proceed?
Thanks in advance,
Gayatri

Pl do not post duplicate threads - Restricting the user to access only one view in or database

Restricting the user to view his information

Hi frnds,
I have a report which is having the information of Actual sales and Planned sales of all employees.
If a user i.e the employee login into the portal is able to all employees Actual sales and Planned sales information.
But here my requirement is the user who ever loged in has to see his Actual sales and Planned sales information only not the others.
So here how can I restrict the user who ever loged in can see his sales information only?
I think it is possible through authorizations. Am i correct?
If yes How can i proceed?
Thanks & Regards,
sridhar

Hi Sridhar,
Check this thread..
/message/1143264#1143264 [original link is broken]
Might help u in some way..
-Pradnya

In Free goods how to restrict the quantity to not to alter.

Dear All,
I have maintain condition record for free goods in VBN1.EX.102.While creating sales order for 20 quantities system populates 204.But if am changing this as 152 or 205,system is allowing to do.Same is the case at delivery.How can we restrict the system to not to allow the changes in sales order in case of free goods .Please guide me.
Regards,
Deepti

Hi
KIndly check the below user exit and make the free goods item as in display mode
MV45AFZZ 'USEREXIT_FIELD_MODIFICATION'
to change the SCREEN-INPUT = 0 to make it display for free goods item category Tann
By doing above if any one changes main item system will accordingly change the free goods item also
Regards
Damu.

Restrict the user by not proceeding to next slide

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for