Restrict the user should not allow to select No Excise entry tab in MIGO

Hi
how to restrict the user should not allow to select No Excise entry tab in MIGO
if the material Excisable user can bale to select the No Excise entry tab in MIGO . my requirement .... if the Pop come Please enter Excise Invoice number and Excise Invoice Date user should not change the No Excise how to restrict pls advise me
@sakhi

These are the options provided by SAP keeping in mind Indian Scenario. Sometimes, vendor forget to send excise invoice copy with the material, in such case, you can select 'Only Part I'.
Even if you have maintain vendor excise details & material excise details (By mistake) in J1ID, system will throw an error message, excise invoice value is zero. In such case, we can select option 'No excise entry'.
Your requirement can't be fulfilled in standard way. Even if you go for any Z- developement, you will lose the option.

Similar Messages

  • ]The requirement is  that users should not allow  them to save if the indic

    hi guys
    when  u are doing GR in  the excise tab page  if u find an <b>icon (yellow one</b>) called <b>more data</b>  if  u click that one  u  go  to other screen where u will find a <b>tab page </b> named <b>miscellaneous</b> ther u can see <b>MRP indicator</b> check.
    <b>The requirement is  that users should not allow  them to save if the indicator is not ticked</b>.
    help me  guys
    kiran

    You can either use Tcode NACE for output procedure pr follow following path in SPRO:
    IMG - SD - Basic Functions - Output control - Output Determination - Maintain Output Determination for Billing Documents - Maintain Output Determination Procedure
    There for your output procedure used for the desired output type maintain requirement routine as 62 : Billing doc released to acctng.
    This requirement is met if the billing document is complete checking the header, pricing, and all items and has already been passed to financial accounting. The requirement also checks that the document is not relevant for an invoice list. This requirement can be assigned to billing document output condition types that should only be processed when the billing document is complete and forwarded to accounting. This requirement can only be used with billing documents.
    Regards
    JP

  • Solution for Bug 13412084: RESTRICT PAYMENT: IT SHOULD NOT ALLOW PAYMENT BE

    http://attiqahmed.wordpress.com/2012/03/20/solution-for-bug-13412084-restrict-payment-it-should-not-allow-payment-before-invoice-accrual/

    hello sir Octavio
    Im sorry.. I failed to tell you that our encoder of invoices is separate from the one who entry for payments.
    Therefore, the encoder uses the invoices batches[(N) Invoices>Entry>Invoice Batches] whereas the Paymaster(the one who entered payments?) uses the Payments [Payments>Entry>Payments]
    By the way your suggestion did work to disable the Pay in Full checkbox.. but i decided to get rid of the actions button for the encoder.. and another person will be handling the validation and create accounting having such access.
    So what i wanted is that the paymaster wouldn't be able see among the LOV of invoices at the Payments Form if its not created accounting.
    I wanna make sure that all invoices are created accounting.
    thank you so much for the understanding..:-)
    Emgee

  • How to disable Refresh,Reload in browser and user should not allow to multiple browser sessions ?

    Dear All,
    How to disable Refresh,Reload in browser and end user should not allow to multiple browser sessions in portal.Where we need to configure the settings or any code in masthead or any other component. My server version is 7.4 - SP5 .Please help us.
    Thanks for advance,
    BR,
    Durga Rao.

    Dear all,
    i am able to logoff the click refresh button on keyboard.I am using this code to log off the user into the portal.
    document.onkeydown = function(e)
      var key;
      if (window.event) key = event.keyCode
      else
      var unicode = e.keyCode ? e.keyCode : e.charCode
      key = unicode
      switch (key)
      { //event.keyCode
      case 116: //F5 button
        LSAPI.sessionPlugin.logoff();
      event.returnValue = false;
      key = 0; //event.keyCode = 0;
      return false;
      case 82: //R button
      if (event.ctrlKey)
    LSAPI.sessionPlugin.logoff();
      event.returnValue = false;
      key = 0; //event.keyCode = 0;
      return false;
      case 91: // ctrl + R Button
    LSAPI.sessionPlugin.logoff();
      event.returnValue= false;
      key=0;
      return false;
    Thanks.
    But i am unable to control the multiple windows opening the browser.So any one can tell me the how to block the new window and new tab/duplicate tab option.
    BR,
    Durga Rao.

  • I need a sample vi that can plot a transfer function given zeroes and poles (It should allow the user to input zeroes and poles). It should be done in the S domain.The user should be allowed to put poles and zeroes, with frequency

    I need a sample vi that can plot a transfer function given zeroes and poles (It should allow the user to input zeroes and poles). The user should be allowed to put poles and zeroes, with frequency. DONE IN S DOMAIN.

    I have created a VI (LabVIEW 6.1) that does what you want. Note that the poles and zeros have to be entered correctly that is in Rad/s and typically with negative real part. The VI offers you all options for lin/log frequency axis, magnitude in dB or not, phase in Radians or Degrees etc...
    The VI is written with "academic" in mind, so it is not optimized for performances but (hopefully) for clarity. I hope this will work for you.
    Attachments:
    S-Domain_Transfer_Function_from_Poles-Zeros.vi ‏167 KB

  • The shipment should not allow to save without partner forwarrding agent.

    The CR (forwarding agent) partner is set as Mandatory in the configuration for partner procedure TR, but you can save a shipment without this partner function.  We are only using Shipment type Z003 and the TR procedure is assigned, and the CR partner is set as mandatory but the system is not requiring it.  Why isn't the Mandatory flag working in create mode?  If there is a CR on a shipment already, it will not let you delete it, but it will let you create a shipment and save without the CR partner.  See Shipmentxxx in DX1, it was created and saved without any partners on the partner tab.
    The shipment should not allow to save without partner forwarrding agent.

    Hi,
    Check config for 'Set Up Partner Determination for Shipments'.
    I believe the Partner function for Forwarding agent is FA and here you are talking about CR.
    Also make sure you Partner determination procedure is reflecting in your Shipment type.
    Regards,
    Amit

  • How to set the item property to restrict the user to not to copy from above

    Hi Guru's,
    I have a requirement like, There were two items on the form name email Id, Confirm email Id.
    I have to ristrict the user to not to copy from email Id item.. make him/her to enter the value into confirm email id item field manually.
    How to set the item property to restrict the user to not to copy from above item and paste it in this item.
    Please help.
    Thanks!!

    Just an opinion here, but that is about the dumbest requirement I have ever seen.
    I am always annoyed by web sites that ask me to enter my email twice. I ALWAYS copy the email address from the original entry and paste it into the second one.
    People enter their email addresses so often, it takes a real klutz to not get it right. And what makes you think that if they enter it twice, that they won't enter it wrong both times anyway???

  • User should not allow to exceed planned order qty

    Hello Experts
    In present case user can change the planned order qty when he converts it to a process order or purchase requisition.
    Is there any way to restrict the user, where user can not exceed the planned order quantity?
    Request to reply with a solution.
    Regards
    Pradipta Sahoo

    Hi Sahoo,
    I have two suggestion regarding the restriction of Changing the quantity while converting the Planned order into Process Order OR Pur Reqt. :
    1. First one is through the authorisation for the user, the suggestion given by our friends.
    2. You can use a User exit in the Planned Order Conversion transaction (CO40 / CO41/ MD04 etc). Where you can code to refer a Z- Table created with the User whom to be allowed.
    You can create a Z table and mention the user id for whom system should allow the change of Quantity during converion of planned order. So wheh the user is trying to convert the planned order system will fire the User exit and check if the user is available in the Z-table then it will allow him/her to modify the qty otherwise it will through an Error as required.
    Request you to take the help of the Abaper to invoke the userexit .
    I can suggest the third option too, but not sure whther it will work, you can try out.
    3. If you feel no user should be allowed to modify the quantity then I suggest you to create a Error message in the conversion tcode if the qty is being modified. You can try using a field exist.
    Regards
    radhak mk

  • Restrict the user by not proceeding to next slide

    Hi,
    I have created a Drag & Drop interactivity with Drag & Drop Interactivity wizard, I just wanted to restrict the user not to proceed to nextslide unless he/she completes the activity.
    Can you please help me how do I do this?
    Thanks,
    Ajay

    I have created drag & drop as you can see in the screenshot.
    Here is my requirement:
    1. I want to restrict the user not to proceed to next slide till he completes the drag & drop activity.
    2. I want all the drag items to display all the time.
    Thanks,
    Ajay

  • PO data should not allow to change

    Dear Forums,
    Can any body so kind to find a way in solve the following business requirement:
    In my client business scenario the PR only subjected to release. PO against the PR not go for any release.
    My client require the user should not allow to change the data of PO which is pick from PR (PO created reference to PR).
    For example : user should not allow to change the quantity in the PO which capture from PR while creating the PO reference to PR.
    Your early reply should highly appreciated.
    Regards,
    sp sahu

    Hi,
    there is no standard way of doing this and I am not sure that it should be done.
    How are you going to be able to correct errors and set deletion flags, delivery completerd flags etc. if the PO is blocked for change?
    If you really want to do this then  I would create a new document type that has the requisition reference field set to mandatory. This means that the document tyoe can ONLY be used for creating POs that refer to requisitions. Then change the field settings for this new PO document to display only in ME22n.
    That way, POs that don't reference a requisition will use another PO document type that has the fields set to open for input in ME22n.
    Would this do what you need to do?
    You should also look at the EVO and EFB parameters and config (in the Purcashing config menu under environment data > Default values for buyers (the EVO paraneters are maintained here)  The EFB parameter (the more powerful settings) is configured in the purchasing > Authorisation Management > Define function authorisations for buyers)
    Read the configuration text help and note the flags and what they do.
    Steve B

  • User should not be voiding the dispute created by other User

    Hi,
    I having an Issue at my work place.I have got a Requirement from the Finance Functional Folks that the user should be able to create the dispute case and also void the case created by him.But the user should not be able to void the dispute case created by the Other user.
                                           As of now when I am testing the user is able to void the dispute case created by him and also void the dispute case created by other user.So now I am trying to restrict so that user should not be able to void the dispute case created by other user.
    In the Roles Built at work place I have fdm_coll01-collections Management and also udm_dispute-dispute manamgement T-codes built in One Role.can any one of you let me know at which authorization object this can be restricted as I am having a hard time trying to find out.
    In Ideal SAP World what my idea was a Dispute case created by the user in Production should not be allowed to void the dispute case.so creating a dispute case and voiding a dispute case should be treated differently and should be done by different persons in an organization.

    In Ideal SAP World what my idea was a Dispute case created by the user in Production should not be allowed to void the dispute case.so creating a dispute case and voiding a dispute case should be treated differently and should be done by different persons in an organization.
    So why not talk back to your FI Folks. Also check with your Compliance Team.
    But anyhow, I do not see in the real world a conflict of duties by giving access to both creating a Dispute and voiding a dispute and more over voiding a dispute is considered critical since it would allow to Release Blocked Orders.
    But the user should not be able to void the dispute case created by the Other user.
    If every transcation and conversation with a Customer is recorded in the Collections Management system, I do not see a requirement for the same Team Member having access to close a dispute created by other user. 
    AB.

  • System should not allow to delete PO line Item after GR/IR

    Hi,
    I am working on a SAP Retail Implementation project.
    Currently the system is allowing us to delete the PO line items after doing GR or IR against that PO line item. But the clients requirement is that the system should not allow to delete PO line item after doing GR/IR.
    We are using Account Assignment Category-N, Item Category-S.
    Please let me know if you have the solution for this requirement.
    Thanks in advance
    Thanks & Regards,
    Suresh

    Hi,
    Standard SAP will not allowed the PO to be deleted once it was GR done. The controlled is on the attributes of message to set as "E"
    Message no. 06115
    But if invoiced takes place, the is the point that PO can be deleted.
    You have to do have a Enhancement using MM06E005, insert you logic here to check PO history tables like EKBE, then check if invoice " Q" (BEWTP) exist, the PO cannot be deleted once the user delete the PO line and SAVE it. Ask you developer to help you on the following coding.
    Use MM06E005 and EXIT_SAPMM06E_012
    IF SY-TCODE = 'ME22N'.
    IF sy-ucomm = 'MESAVE' OR SY-UCOMM = 'YES'..
    LOOP AT TEKPO.
    IF TEKPO-LOEKZ = 'L'.
    SELECT SINGLE BELNR FROM EKBE INTO BELNR1 WHERE EBELN = TEKPO-EBELN AND EBELP = TEKPO-EBELP AND BEWTP = 'E'.
    IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
    SELECT SINGLE BELNR FROM EKBE INTO BELNR2 WHERE EBELN = TEKPO-EBELN AND EBELP = TEKPO-EBELP AND BEWTP = 'Q'.
    IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
    Regards,

  • Residual payment should not allow more than Vendor Invoice

    Hi,
    Eg: Vendor has booked invoice 5000 INR, when user make payment through F-53 or F-58 through "Residual" payment user can pay more than invoice 5002 INR and below accounting entry is posting.
    Bank Cr 5002 INR
            To  Vendor Dr 5000 INR (Invoice amount)
            To  Vendor Dr 02    INR  Excess than invoice 
    Business requirement is system should not allow pay more than invoice amount. How to control suggestion would be appreciated.
    I have done below settings for your understanding here system configuration.
    1. OBA3: Under "Permitted Payment difference" zero for Gain , Loss , Amount, Percent & Adjust Discount By  However "Permitted Payment Differences for Automatic write-Off(Function code AD)" zero.
    2. OBA4: Cash discount per line item: Zero and Under "Permitted Payment difference" Revenues, Expense, Percent & Cash discount  put Zero.
    Regards,
    Babu.

    Hi Prashant,
    I have restricted many fields to use through screen variant now user can not pay more than Invoice amount except through Residual payment process.
    Client side management strongly says that they want to use Partial and Residual payment process options but user should not allow pay more than invoice amount.
    If any solution please guide me.
    Regards,
    Babu.

  • Duplicate record should not allow to enter

    hi
    i have three columns
    sno Number;
    in time date;
    out time date;
    this is the multiple taulat layout :
    User enter at run time values like this :
    1 01:15 03:00
    1 01:15 03:00 Here second record User should not allow to enter same Sno for Same In time and End time
    Before entering the data the total no of records : 0
    can u give me any suggestion.
    how to validate the columns.

    If you have a Unique Constraint on the table for these there columns it will prevent duplicate records.
    1 01:15 03:00 Here second record User should not allow to enter same Sno for Same In time and End timeBy "Second User" do you mean a user in a seperate Forms Session? If so, there is no way to check if the user in session 2 is entering a duplicate of a record entered by a user is session 1 accept through the use of a unique constraint on the table.
    There are methods available for checking for duplicates in the same Forms Session. Check out: Avoid duplicates in the same block and Forms: Record Group Processing (Duplicate Value Checking) for more information.
    Hope this helps,
    Craig B-)
    If someone's response is helpful or correct, please mark it accordingly.

  • Restrict the user to select wrong wbs

    Dear Experts,
    I am creating a purchase requisition for project material by selecting account assignment category as Q. In the line item I am selecting plant for which the material is being procured. But if I select wrong wbs element ( wbs of other plant) then also system allows the P.R. to save. The same case is for creating P.O.as well as doing goods receipt and goods issue also.
    Please guide how the system should restrict the user to select wrong wbs while creating P.R. P.O. Goods Receipt and Goods Issue.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Aaditya

    Hi,
    Not sure but try checking these exits,
    SAPL2012 - Customer Exit for Enjoy Purchase Orders via BAPIs          
    SAPLMEWP - |Customer exit for processing of purchase orders via BAPIs  
    Hope it helps.
    Regards,
    Gokul

Maybe you are looking for

  • Single and strategy plan( What does it means )?

    Hi all, Please explain me what does single cycle plan and strategy plan means. Following is my requirement. ( Since Swedish mills and other units use not only single cycle plans but also strategy plans , sometimes with multiple operations to each mai

  • FTP user conection error message

    Hi I apologize if this threat not belong here, but we're having problem with a client interface (Z) with FTP transfer, show this message: "User ftperp has no access authorization for computer 10.240.0.15" Where we can check this user(FTP)  was create

  • How to insert data into database. Please help me(Struggling Very much)

    Hi i am having a jsp page which contains some textfields and one button. I have a database table and i have added to my page. The first column of Database table is ID which is of NUMERIC type and it has been set into primary key. And rest of fields a

  • Idea: Transparent backgrounds!

    I've been poring through the Keynote discussions for the first time in a long time, and one of the recurring themes is that you can't run an animated background, or any animation at all, for that matter, across multiple slides. Suddenly it occurred t

  • Date & Time changed by itself - VIRUS ?

    Wonder if anyone of you can understand this strange behaviour. When I boot up this morning (not connected to Internet yet - Airport off, no internet connection), I have the following messages: 1. A series of 4 messages asking to "Deny" or "Allow" 4 p