Restrict Vendors in SRM system

Hi All,
I have replicated vendors from R/3 system to SRM system through BBPGETVD transaction.
As per our requirement, while creating shopping cart it should not allow to accept source of supply with certain vendor account group.
I there any possibilty to restrict vendors based on account group.
Please suggest.
Thanks

Hi SAP User,
I dont think we can restrict the user in EBP based on account group SINCE We did not bring this information info in to EBP.The sap standard is based on Purchase organisation vs vendor.
But you can block the vendor centrally in EBP. Let us wait for others reply. you can also look in to this thread
Change SRM vendor search help
regards
Muthu

Similar Messages

  • Preferred Vendor in SRM 5.0

    Hi Gurus,
    The set up is SRM 5.0 Classic scenario, the requirement is when user creates a SC , he should be able to select vendors in the preferred vendor field under source of supply and a PO should be created once this SC is approved.
    There is a restricted  list of vendors which should only be available in f4 help of Preferred vendors.
    Question is How to set up this? I have already replicated these vendors in SRM system
    Thanks,
    SAP PR

    Hi
    You can do it by BBP_doc_change_BADI for bus2121 by swaping partner function 39 to 19.
    39 - preferred vendor
    19 - fixed vendor
    Muthu

  • Will MM-SUS scenario work perfectly if we replicate SUS vendors from SRM

    Dear Gurus'
    We are going to use MM-SUS scenario in our classic implementation of SAP SRM. However, we are not replicating the SUS vendors directly from MM system using BD14.
    Instead, we are replicating the SUS vendors from SRM system by ticking the 'Portal Vendor' check box in SAP SRM.
    Will all MM-SUS scenario work perfectly in such cases? If I refer the configuration of MM-SUS scenario, it mentions about special configuration for transferring the confirmation key from ECC vendor master data to SUS system. How it will be taken care in SRM-SUS vendor replication?
    Could you please share your experience?
    Thanks and regards,
    Ranjan
    Ranjan Sutradhar

    hi,
    Are the Suppliers getting Time Out Errors?
    are they able to create the documents ?
    I have seen these sort of problems in many customers , there is one performance note created by SAP to resolve this issue.
    I do not have the note number now.
    But you can search the same with keyword performance along with the component areas
    SRM-SUS
    ans SRM-EBP-TEC-PFM.
    Best would be to enquire with SAP also..

  • Automatic Replication of Vendors from SAP R/3 Backend System to SRM System

    Hi All,
    I am searching for any existing standard configuration in SRM V 4.0 System for replicating Vendors of selected Purchasing Organizations from SAP R/3 Backend System to SRM System.
    I have checked in the SPRO  settings of SRM System and found/could make out from the documentation avalable in help itself, that there is a standard configuration by which you can automatically replicate the Vendors created in SAP R/3 by activating the following in SPRO: By putting a tick mark against the Check Box existing against "Create New Vendors also"  under Vendor Synchronization with Make Global Settings I hope.
    If the above statement is correct, then I hope we have to schedule a job ,since the above configuration is based on a job based execution which should run at least once a day.
    In that case,which would be the relevant job which has to be created WITH A VARIANT in order to filter the Purchasing Organizations desired for.
    Please help me out since we have to implement this asap.And if the above solution is not at all feasible,then please do reply at the earliest.
    Awaiting for your early reply .
    Regards
    Annette

    Hi
    Please try this ->
    <b>http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/56/54f137a5e6740ae10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/bb/6c0e3b02616a42e10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/62/fb7d3cb7f58910e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/5e/88ef3bc8821d0de10000000a114084/frameset.htm</b>
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Vendor Master can not replicate from SAP R3 to SAP SRM system.

    Hi All,
    We face one issue when we use bbpgetvd program to transfer Vendor master from SAP R3 to SAP SRM, after I check Analysis Application log, found the following issue:
    Error: No Bank Master Data Maintained No Bank Data Transferred
    Error: Name/Address for Vendor Already Exists Vendor: 0015118743 Address Number 0000054208
    Error: Warning: Complete Business Partner: Vendor: 0015118743 Backend: APP002TS No Transfer of Vendor Data
    But I check BP in SRM and can not find vendor 0015118743 information, so could you give me any tips or suggestions to fix this issue. Is there any table in SRM system to keep Vendor Master like SAP R3?
    Thanks for your kind suggestions or help in advnance!

    Hello Gavin,
    >
    Gavin Feng wrote:
    > (...)
    > 1. How to use BP to find business partner by address num 0000054208, I did not find this search condition.
    > (...)
    You cannot.
    Business Partner are stored in BUT000 table. I don't remember if its address number is also stored in this table.
    If yes, link is done directly between both.
    If not, this is the person number which is stored in BUT000. So, use your address number to get its corresponding person number using ADCP table. Then, with this person number, check in BUT000 what is its corresponding Business Partner.
    Finally, with its corresponding GUID, check in VENMAP table the vendor number.
    >
    Gavin Feng wrote:
    > (...)
    > 2. I used VENMAP and ADRC to check vendor 0015118743 and address num 0000054208, but there is no record in both table, so why the SRM system generate information that is "Name/Address for Vendor Already Exists".
    > (...)
    See my answer above concerning ADCP table.
    Regards.
    Laurent.

  • How to restrict the BBPMAININT t code with diplay mode in srm system.

    Hi experts,
    I want to restrict the T code BBPMAININT : Maintain Business Partner with DISPLAY mode in SRM system?
    Action Taken:1. I have restricted with "03 Activity"  of all check and maintainauthorization objects for this  tocde .
    2. I have performed the authorization trace also, there also I have not found any new objects.
    Here are list of auth object I have restricted:
    BBP_FUNCT
    BBP_PD_AUC
    BBP_PD_BID
    BBP_PD_CNF
    BBP_PD_CTR
    BBP_PD_INV
    BBP_PD_PCO
    BBP_PD_PO
    BBP_PD_QUO
    But I have not  clearly understand of the object : BBP_FUNCT.
    In this Object, I have maintained BE_F4_HELP value only.   And rest of the auth object I have restricted to 03 activity only.
    But still users are able to acess the CREATE and MANAGE buttons.
    So how Can I restrict the this T code in display mode?
    Please suggest me...
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Siva

    Dear Poster
    Your thread has had no response since it's creation over
    2 weeks ago, therefore, I recommend that you either:
    - Rephrase the question.
    - Provide additional Information to prompt a response.
    - Close the thread if the answer is already known.
    Thank you for your compliance in this regard.
    Jason Boggans
    SAP SRM SDN Moderator

  • PO Transfer Vendor in SRM

    Requirement:
    I have a requirement to restrict the PO sending for a specific vendor (External), during PO amendment in SRM system.
    SAP ---> XI ---> Vendor system.
    What I did:
    I was trying to use the method of copying the implementation BBP_PO_SEND_XML to a user-defined implementation ‘ZBBP_PO_SEND_XML’ (referring the note 492988).
    My query:
    1. In one of the blog I read " If you don't activate XI in the customizing, then SRM considers the BC scenario during the PO XML output ". Where do i need to set this?
    Is there any specific setting in SPRO for XI activation?
    2. During the PO sending none of the functions mentioned below is getting triggered:
    a. BCEBPXML1 BBP_BAPI_PO_SEND
    b. XIEBPXML1 BBP_XI_PO_SEND
    c.  XISAPXML1 BBP_SAPXML1_PO_SEND.
    Is the triggering of the FM's are scenario specific?
    3. Can anyone suggest a solution for my requirement?
    Kindly advice me how to proceed.
    Warm Regards,
    Jojo

    Hello Jojo,
    There is a specific setting that needs to be active  if you want to use XI as an XML interface.
    Go to Customizing>SRM> SRM Server -->Cross Application Basic Settings --> Enable use of Exchange Infrastructure.
    for example: Enable Use of Exchange Infrastructure
    Use
    Here you determine if Enterprise Buyer is to use the Exchange Infrastructure for communication between system components.
    Activities
    To enable the Exchange Infrastructure for your system, flag the indicator Use Application Infrastucture. The system then exchanges data between system components via interfaces of the Exchange Infrastructure.
    Example
    Within SRM scenarios, for example, Supplier Self-Services (SUS), you exchange documents between Enterprise Buyer and a SUS System
    with regards,
    mahesh

  • Error during creation of Local Vendors in SRM

    Hi
    I am trying to create a Local Vendor in SRM using "Manage Business Partner" option through browser. After giving in all the details when I save the vendor the system creates a Business Partner ID (BPXXXXXXXXXXXX) but doesn't create a Business Partner Number. And moreover the vendors below the Root Node are created as Plant and not Persons.
    Can someone kindly help me out.
    Regards
    Manoj

    Hi manoj
    What value given here for Central Organizational Object for Bidder in Company code data? in the managing Business partner. You need to Give your vendor organisation structure value PPOSA_BBP (5XXXXXXX). However whenever BP created it will be available in bUT000 table
    Create as a vendor.
    regards
    Muthu

  • OCI Catalog for Vendor problem : Logical system for catalog not maintained

    We have set up an OCI catalog with on of our vendors. This works fine untill we transfer shopping basket data from Vendor sysem into our SRM-system (SRM5.0). Then data is not being transfered and Vendor Webshop screen remains 'open'.
    in SLG1 i have found an error "Logical system for catalog not maintained. Inform system administrator'
    Anyone an idea what the cause of this error can be or what we need to check ?
    Thanks in advance

    Hi,
    I have not seen that error before. However, I think it may have to do with the LOGICAL_SYSTEM OCI field. Can you check if your punch-out catalog vendor is populating that field? Also, check if you have the correct BP# populated in the catalog configuration and the LOGICAL SYSTEM Field on the define External Webservices is blank.
    SG

  • RFC enabled FM to fetch partner details of vendor from ECC system

    Hi All,
    I am working on an enhancement in SRM system.the requirement is as follows.
    1.In the current SRM application, the invoicing party partner function does not exist.Because of this, the invoicing party cannot be populated on any external purchasing documents such as RFQ, PO, RO, contracts.
    2.This functionality exists in ECC. In ECC, the user can enter an invoicing party on a vendor master record.The invoicing party functionality will be deployed to SRM so that external purchasing documents are populated with the correct invoicing party.There is a standard vendor replication program for this...
    To accomplish the above said functionality, I have planned to do like this in SRM system....
    1.There is a BADI "BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI" with a method "BBP_PO_CHANGE ". This will get triggered when a PO is getting created or changed.
    2.In that there is a table called IT_PARTNERS which will have all the partner details in it.
    3.I will take the partner (vendor number i.e.,partner function is 0000019) and pass that value to an RFC enabled function module which will fetch the invoicing party from ECC system.
    4.Later that Invoicing party number is appended to the IT_PARTNERS so that it will be populated on any external purchasing documents.
    Here I want to know whether any standard RFC enabled function module which fetches the invoice party details from ECC system.
    Awaiting your answers...
    Thanks,
    Ravee..

    Hi. Just use function RFC_READ_TABLE and table WYT3.
    Regards,
    Dave.

  • Replicating vendors from SRM to ECC

    Hi All,
    We are implementing SRM 7.0 EHP1 and we have a SRM-SUS scenario.
    We have a requirement where we want to replicate the vendors from SRM to ECC.
    I know that there are standard programs and interfaces for replicating vendors from ECC to SRM, but are there any standard programs XI/PI interfaces that are available for replicating vendores from SRM to ECC?
    Please share your thoughts....
    Thanks in advance!

    Hi Jack,
    Unfortunately I don't have a config guide for it. Can you speak to your XI/PI consultant and just ask him to configure this scenario in XI/PI.
    PS: Before this you should import all SRM related business content in your PI system.
    Regards,
    Nikhil

  • How does a catalogue vendor gets charactarized as a fixed vendor in SRM?

    Dear Expters,
    can you please help me understand the standard SRM behaviour (7.0, CS) for the following point:
    When a catlogue item is purchased from a third party catalogue platfrom, than the vendor of this catalogue item is displayed as a fixed vendor in the EBP shopping cart, afer the return from the catalogue platform from SRM.
    How exactly does the charactarization of the vendor as fixed vendor happens?
    I mean, does it happen in a way that during the return from the catalogue platform to SRM, the catalogue platform sends the
    content 000019 into the SRM field partner_fct?
    Or is the approach completely different and it is done somehow in a way that SRM receives that data from the catalogue platform, than for example understands somehow that this position was sent from a catalogue and based on that decides that the vendor should have the "fixed vendor" partner function?
    Thank you.

    Hello,
    The SRM system behaves as described below:                                                                               
    Limit item:                                                               
    If a SC is created with a vendor, it is considered as a "Fixed Vendor".                                                                               
    Free text item:                                                           
    If a SC is created with vendor, it is considered as a "Preferred Vendor".                                                                               
    Catalog items:                                                            
    When an item is added from a catalog to SC, the vendor is always considered as "Fixed vendor".                                                                               
    It is possible to change the "Preferred Vendor" to "Fixed Vendor" through BADI implementation BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI~BBP_SC_CHANGE.
    Anyway, if you create a cart using catalog item, vendor will always be considered as fixed.
    Regards,
    Ricardo

  • Ticking the 'portal vendor' in SRM not triggering the XML message in SRM?

    Dear experts,
    I have ticked the 'portal vendor' in the supplier master data in SRM.
    I have maintained the output medium as 'XML\XI'.
    The 'permit surrogate bidding' button is unticked.
    Then, I have saved the supplier master data successfully.
    Still no XML message is generated for the supplier transfer to PI  in the transaction SXMB_MONI.
    Could you please comment what things I should look for?
    Thanks and regards,
    Ranjan

    Dear Nikhil/Soumyaprakash,
    The XML message was not generated from the SRM system due to missing config details in the 'define system landscape directory' in the SRM system.
    Now, The SRM system is generating the XML message for supplier transfer. The PI system is successfully processing the messages. On the receiver side, the SUS system is also successfully processing the message.
    However, no supplier is created under the root vendor organization in SUS system. No mail is also triggered. I have also maintained the vendor and porg details in the table 'BBP_MARKETP_INFO'.
    Could you please check if anything is needed to trigger the creation of vendor record in SUS?
    Thanks in advance,
    Ranjan
    Ranjan Sutradhar

  • The quick way to tell it is a SRM system or not

    Experts:
    I want to know if there is any quick way to determine a SRM system,  such as some SRM unique txn?
    On txn saint, Business Planning and Consolidate is a SRM only package?
    If you could provide the SRM t-codes that can launch web-browser, you might help me to identify it is a SRM7.0 or not.
    Thanks!

    Hi Kelly
    bbp_pd transaction helps to determine whether this system is SRM transaction or not
    go to bbp_pd
    select SRM Business Object like bus2121 etc...then you can make ensure that SRM business objects are created so it is srm system
    some customers uses for Only GOA , some use only for creating BID Invitation and BID only.
    PPOMV_BBP - makes ensure that it is SRM system all vendors are stored int his transaction
    BUT000 - table - entries present means all business partners are stored in this table.
    please clarify what exactly you are looking for..
    muthu

  • Linking of ECC vendor with SRM ROS supplier in EBP

    Hello,
    How can we link manualy created ECC vendor with SRM ROS supplier in EBP, I dont have PI system.
    Thnks,
    Raju

    Raju the link is established basically (if i talk purely technical) in table VENMAP.
    it has 3 fields...
    partner guid| logical_system| vendor number(in logical system)
    so here
    partner_guid is the guid of the supplier in BUT000
    log_sys is the logical system to which you want it to connect it to(in this case ECC logical system)
    and vendor is the vendor number in that connecting logical system(means ecc vendor number)
    so this creates the link.
    but which version of SRM and SUS are you using?

Maybe you are looking for