Restricting delivery based on Volume

Hi All,
Can i know what steps need to be followed to check the delivery based on volume of the material. The reqt. is that if the volume exceeds certain ccm, then,the delivery should not happen. can i know what settings need to be done.
All answers will be rewarded.
Thanks & Regards
Aravind

Hi
Can I understand what you mean by maintaining the sale order properly, as the volume is calculated from the material master and the qty maintained in the sale order, if it is maintained in sale order, based on it how the delivery could split if it exceeds a given volume.
Thanks & Rewards
Aravind

Similar Messages

PGI and Delivery based on FIFO

Dear All,
I have a requirement that while GR we enter the batch based on the manufacturing date. I want PGI and delivery on FIFO based on the GR date of the material. Moreover, we have two company codes using the same material codes. I want to have FIFO based delivery applied in only one company code.It should not affect the other company.Is it possible at plant level. I also dont want automatic batch creation at GR time. I want PGI and Delivery based on the GR date. Please suggest

create a batch search strategy in VCH1 with strategy type as SD02- and select the key combination as customer, plant & material so that you can restrict the batch search strategy in plant level.
or
use MBC1 - select the strategy ME01, select the key combination as Movement type, plant & material

Delivery based on qty specified in delivery schedule in Scheduling Agreemnt

Hi,
We have a scenario where we need to create delivery based on the quantities entered in the delivery schedule in Scheduling Agreement, eg.
on 10.11.2011 qty to be delivered is 10
on 15.11.2011 qty to be delivered is 20
We have sufficient stock and the entire qty of 30 (10+20) is confirmed. Now when we create the delivery on 10.11.2011 the system is delivering the entire qty of 30, whereas the requirement is that on 10.11.2011 only qty 10 should be proposed by the system in delivery. Please help.
Regards,
Abhishek.

Hi,
1.Please check is there two schedule lines are present.
2. Check the expected delivery date/check the from to date for delivery creation.
or
you can change the expected delivery date between 10-14 and check it should work.
Gajanan

Moment type in delivery based on PO

Hi Gurus,
Please guide me that in the replenishment delivery based on PO, how the moment type is coming in to delivery document.
Thanks & Regards,
Savi

Hi
In Normal sales process
With sales doc type + Item category group in MMR system determines Item category (T code VOV4)
With Item cate + MRP type in in MMR system determines schedule line category (T code VOV5)
In schedule line category we have the movement type (which we all know) (T code VOV6)
For STO or PO in MM settings we assign delivery type to PO type
So system picks the delivery type
The item category determination happens with delivery type + Item category group in MMR system determines item category in delivery document (T code 0184 or zero184 )
For this item category + MRP type in in MMR system determines schedule line category (T code VOV5)
For this schedule line category we maintain movement type (T code VOV6)
This is how movement type is getting determined
For normal Sales flow is--> (T code VOV4)(T code VOV5)-- (T code VOV6)
For PO or STO--> Link between PO type and delivery type-- (T code 0184 or zero184 )--(T code VOV5)-- (T code VOV6)
Hope you are getting the difference
There is a big logic difference is applied
I have tried to explain to the best of my abilities
Regards
Raja

How to produce different outbound delivery based on different schedule line

Hi,
I want to create different outbound delivery based on different schedule line time,but system automatically create a combining delivery document with a sum number.
For example,
schedule line
date               goods issue time   qty
2011.08.24     08:00:00                1
2011.08.24     10:00:00                1
when I create the outbound delivery, system create only one document with quantity 2.
But I need two documents with quantity 1 in every document.
How to solve this requirement?
Thanks.

Hi,
I viewed the item requirement in VOFM, found that they are status check for the copy control, not the split control.
Could you please give me a example?
In the copy control--header--conditions----order requirement ( or combination requirement )
They are like this :
(001)
bp_subrc = 0.
Check that reference document is an order (if not, issue error)
if cvbak-vbtyp cn vbtyp_auft.        "Auftrag?
    perform message_handling in program (programmname)
                                       using cvbap-posnr
                                         '003'
                                         'E'
                                         'VL'
                                         cvbak-vbeln
                                         space
                                         space
                                         space.
    bp_subrc = 1.
    check 1 = 2.
endif.
Check the status of the Fonds-Management
IF CVBUK-FMSTK EQ 'A'.
    PERFORM MESSAGE_HANDLING IN PROGRAM (PROGRAMMNAME)
                                       USING CVBAP-POSNR
                                         '889'
                                         'E'
                                         'VL'
                                         CVBAK-VBELN
                                         SPACE
                                         SPACE
                                         SPACE.
    BP_SUBRC = 1.
    CHECK 1 = 2.
ENDIF.
Check that order is not blocked by the automatic credit check
if cvbuk-cmgst ca 'B' and
     cvbuk-abstk ne 'C'.
Credit check is irrelevant for correction deliveries
    if v50agl-sofauftrag eq charx       and
       tvak-lisof       eq space       and
       likp-lfart       eq tvak-korli.
    else.
      perform message_handling in program (programmname)
                                         using cvbap-posnr
                                           '060'
                                           'E'
                                           'VL'
                                           cvbak-vbeln
                                           space
                                           space
                                           space.
      bp_subrc = 1.
      check 1 = 2.
    endif.
endif.
Check the user status from the order header
if not cvbak-objnr eq space.
    call function 'SD_STATUS_VBAK_CHECK_INTERN'
      exporting
        i_objnr              = cvbak-objnr
        i_vrgng              = vrgng_sddn
      exceptions
        allowed_with_warning = 01
        not_allowed          = 02
        object_not_found     = 03
        others               = 99.
    if sy-subrc ne 0.
Fehler nicht bei MODKZ = '2' (Erlaubt mit Warnung)
      if sy-subrc gt 1.
        bp_subrc = 7.
Else ist nötig, da Routine mit "changing sy-subrc" gerufen wird
      elseif sy-subrc eq 1.
        bp_subrc = 0.
      endif.
Check Global delivery flags
line deleted: "n_911988
        perform message_handling in program (programmname)
                                           using cvbap-posnr
                                                 sy-msgno
                                                 sy-msgty
                                                 sy-msgid
                                                 sy-msgv1
                                                 sy-msgv2
                                                 space
                                                 space.
Bei Fehler: Bedingung verlassen
      check bp_subrc ne 7.
    endif.
endif.

FD32 restrict users based on a schedule of authority

All,
I have a requirement within FD32 to restrict users based on a schedule of authority. For example, only allowing credit limits to be changed in a user's authorized dollar range. I was able to restrict the Credit Limit field (change/display) by using field groups, but I have an extension of the requirement for a schedule of authority. Can someone please help?

You could use F_KNA1_BED, I guess - but that would mean excessive maintenance of both: BEGRU and customers, if I understood your scenario correctly and you really, really want to break that down to single customers.
It would be even more excessive to utilize F_KNA1_GRP. Can be done, though.
Both solutions are completely un-elegant and I am not happy proposing them. But I am curious as a cat: what exactly is the business process expecting you to restrict access to customer data down to a single customer?
Edited by: Mylène Dorias on Mar 24, 2010 8:39 AM

Restrict users based on Customers

Hi ,
In ECC system, we have general requirements to restrict users based on customer account group where customer account group is represented as Site/Store.
Possible values for Customer Account group -
- Reference Store
- Head Store
- Wholly Owner Store etc.
Till this point everything is fine. However, Client has few additional External Stores which are represented as one Dummy Site and Customers belonging to that store are actual external Stores.
Example, we have additional Value for Customer Account Group -
- Dummy Site
And now all the Customers part of dummy site is actual stores and we are needed to drill down our restriction to this Customer (So called Stores).
To restrict used based on customer account group/Stores, we can utilize F_KNA1_GRP with filed KTOKD (Customer Account Group). However, is it possible to create roles based on individual customers of these Stores?
If yes, how can we do that?
P.S. I had a look at authorization object F_KNA1_BED with filed BRGRU. Can this object help us in fulfilling our requirement? Or there is any other SAP provided authorization object which can help us to restrict on Customer values?
Thanks,
Sheenam

You could use F_KNA1_BED, I guess - but that would mean excessive maintenance of both: BEGRU and customers, if I understood your scenario correctly and you really, really want to break that down to single customers.
It would be even more excessive to utilize F_KNA1_GRP. Can be done, though.
Both solutions are completely un-elegant and I am not happy proposing them. But I am curious as a cat: what exactly is the business process expecting you to restrict access to customer data down to a single customer?
Edited by: Mylène Dorias on Mar 24, 2010 8:39 AM

Restrict Dashboard based on Role

Hi
Is it possible to Restrict Dashboards based on Role. I want hide out-of-the-box dashboards and display custom dashboards based on Role.
Regards
Sundar

Hi,
but note that the Look In function is not available in the custome web tab. this is really a shame because the lookin allows managers to see the data in different ways. If any of you found a way to get the look in functionaliyt into the web tab, I would love to find out.
Regards,
Gonzalo

Combined order based and delivery based billing

Hey Gurus,
We are using ZTAN items and ZTAD items on the sales orders. We are trying to figure out how to combine these two together to create one invoice. Can you guys help us with what the configuration should be in order do this? I woudl like to knwo what settings I need to make in item category and also what settings need to be changed in the copy controls? Do I need to change them for F2 and other settings in VTFA?
Please let us know.
Sincerely,
Nina

Hi,
Delete the Assignment number and Reference number in the copy control at the header level details in VTFA.
For this message and try it .
We are using order based billing for the ZTAD items right now and using delivery based billing for the ZTAN items. So, to answer your question, we do want to combine these two together.
I have tried setting the VTFA copy control settings to 001, and I still can't seem to get the two line items to combine.
Note, I only created a new copy control for the ZTAD items.
I looked to see if the header data was different and this was the log that was outputted but I can't seem to figure out what this means:
Fld Name $000000001 $000000002
Combination criteria in the bi 0013030 00330308000000064
Assignment number $
I am not sure how to analyze this. If you have any suggestions, I would be really appreciative. Thanks for all of your help Shivaji.
Sincerely,
Nina

Add items to inbound delivery based on PO

Is it possible to add new items to an inbound delivery based on a purchase order? i.e. materials which were not present on the previous purchase order?

Actually, what I mean is the opposite. Is it possible to add additional materials which were not present in the purchase order?

Split delivery based on partner type

Hi Forum Colleagues
I have a scenario where in I need to split delivery based on partner type at line item level.
I am aware I need to look into copy control routine to be able to address this concern, however I am unable to find the solution.
Could someone guide me.
Regards
Kalpesh
Edited by: Kalpesh Mirchandani on Mar 31, 2009 7:07 AM

Hi
I am getting the following error
Item 000002: delivery split due to conflicting header data (Function Y2: Partner Number: 5100001701 <-> 5100001154)
I have created new delivery type in which I have checked "Delivery Split Part" which should ideally address this issue but it is not.
I would like to create delivery for each line item having different partner number. I am unable to locate the routine in which I could include the logic to separate the deliveries based on line item.
Pls guide.
Regards
Kalpesh
Edited by: Kalpesh Mirchandani on Mar 31, 2009 2:01 PM
Edited by: Kalpesh Mirchandani on Apr 1, 2009 6:59 AM

Split the Delivery based on Storage location

HI all,
How to Split the Delivery based on Storage location when creating delivery. is there any functional setting ?
Thanks
Krupali

Hi KR and Lakshmipathi,
I am having exactly the same requirement. My requirement is that i need to split one Sale Order line into multiple line items in delivery based on the stock in a particular storage location at the time of delivery creation.
Eg.
Line item 10 in Sale order for quantity 100.
Storage location stock in the priority
ST01 = 40
ST02 = 25
ST03 = 2000
I wish to have 3 line items in delivery like
Line item           Storage Location             Qty
10                     ST01                                40
20                     ST02                                25
30                     ST03                                35
I was able to do the same in the BADI LE_SHP_DELIVERY_PROC ~ SAVE_DOCUMENT_PREPARE
But i am facing problems regarding the inconsistency in delivery document such as Picking status update etc
Suggest if there is any better method to do.
Thanks in advance.

TO split from one customer return delivery based on storage type

Hello,
How TO can be split from one customer return delivery based on storage type?
For example,
If I have 3 storage type, ST1, ST2, ST3 then and how can I divide the items in to three different TOs of respective storage types from one customer return delivery? Can I use u201Ccontrol for performance data configuration? If yes then provide detail steps.
Thanks,
Milind

Hello,
Any thoughts/ideas?
Thanks
Milind

Restrict printers based on security groups

We have set up all of our printers on a server and deployed them via group policy. I am looking for a way to restrict printing based on which security group the user is in. We have got it working by setting permissions in the printer security tab
in the server. But I would like a more elegant solution, since the printers that the user can't print to are greyed out with an X over the icon. I would like to have the printer not even show up in the printer list if that user isn't allowed to
print there.
Is this possible?
We are running Windows Server 2008 R2 and our clients are all Windows 7.
Thank you.

Hi,
Based on your description, we can use Security Filtering to apply the printer deployment GPO polices to the specific groups.
Regarding this point, the following articles can be referred to for more information.
Security filtering using GPMC
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc781988(v=WS.10).aspx
Filter using security groups
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc779291(v=WS.10).aspx
Besides, we can choose to deploy printers via GPP and use Item-level Targeting to filter out users who don’t need the printers.
Regarding this point, the following blog can be referred to for more information.
Deploying Printers with Group Policy Preferences (Complete Guide)
http://deployhappiness.com/deploying-printers-with-group-policy-preferences/
Regarding Item-level Targeting, the following articles can be referred to for more information.
Preference Item-Level Targeting
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc733022.aspx
Security Group Targeting
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc772471.aspx
Best regards,
Frank Shen

How to restricting comepetncy based on grade

Hi,
We have a requirement to restrict the comepetncy displayed after seraching by employees to those valid for its grade.
Navigation -
Employee Self-Service -> Competency Profile -> Add Comnpetency -> Find Competencies -> Search
Is there anyway to restrict this based on the grade of the employee.
If so, what kind of setup is required in the Competency KFF?
I tried defining a DFF segment for competency and attaching a grade to the segment. So each cometency will hold the grade for which it is valid ( assuming a 1-1 mapping between each grade and competency )
And then I tried to restrict the result of the query by using OA framework and adding a where clause to the View Object dynamically. But it doesn't work.
i will post the OA Framework part of my post in OA Framework forum, but in general is there a way to achieve this requirement.
Thanks,
-Deb

You've pretty much done what I would have tried first (except I am no good at OAF so would have asked a technical buddy).
There is no way to link Competences to grade.
Depending on how many grades you have, you might like to define one Competence Type, each type mapping onto each grade, and then associate the competencies to the type. I believe Types can then share some common competencies if there is crossover. Types will be easier to write SQL off of but you'd still have to customise your VO. It also makes it really easy for employees to search for the correct one.
By the way, storing the grade on the competence keyflex effectively makes it part of the competence name which may start to look clunky in self service. I'd consider sticking the grade on the Competence flexfield which will also make your SQL easier to write as well as streamlining your competence name (I find querying on keyflex segments a bit of a chore).
Last resort is you could simply code some PL/SQL in a user hook to error if the employee tries to add a competence that is not appropriate for their grade.

Restricting delivery based on Volume

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for