Restriction for only one chief position per organizational unit.

Hi
Customer insists of having not more than one chief position in each org. unit.
Is there any way that the system will block or give a warning while I am trying to mark an additional chief position for an org unit ?

Hi Zeev,
you need to create a user exit.
Aranka

Similar Messages

One Chief Position in One Org Unit

Hi
I want to restrict the number of chief positions in an org unit. One org unit should have only one chief position.
Please guide me on how to achieve this.
Regards
Minal

Dear Minal,
Use T-code-OOZR create an entry with the combination
O-1001-B012-S-0, so that you can restrict 1position as chief of the org unit. In case you want to change the chief then, select another position of the unit and create chief position, automatically earlier position's chief relationship record is deleted.
Regards,
Anil.

Positions under Organizational Units.

Dear All,
I need to maintain a Ceiling for Organizational Units with respect to Positions.
For example :
There is a Org Unit - HR Dept , and it has a restricition of 25 positions.
So when i try to create a 26th position under this Org Unit ,it should show me "Error Message".
I have tried with Quota Planning, which is totally different concept from the above case.
Does SAP provides such option to restrict Positions under a OrgUnit..? If Yes, Pls Suggest me ...!!
Thanks in Anticipation
Best Regards,
A B H I

Do not know of any way to limit the number of Positions per Organizational Unit. Not sure how or where you would even keep the numbers so that one org unit could have 25 positions and another org unit 40 and another org unit only 10.
What you want to control is the number of Persons - employees. They cost you money, positions do not. This is controlled by the number of Positions available - one Person per Position. If you have control of your Organizational Structure maintenance, then you control the number of Positions you create for each Organization.
Paul

Can More than one chief Position Approve Pay Increase in Compensation Mgt

Hi Gurus
I am new to compensation Management and there was a scnario given to me to identify more than one Chief Position can approve an employee's Budget or Pay hike?
Is there any Possibility available in standard SAP Functionality?
Can anyone help me out by sending Compensation Mangement Configuration document for my reference.

Yes! you can have the following stages;
Submit - Initiator
Reject - Approver 1
Approve - Approver 1
Activate - Approver 2
Best Regards,
Aslam Roaz

How to realize only one identical remoteApp per session per user per computer?

If a terminalserver 2008 R1 is configured for only one session per user, everything works like it should if the user connects using the 'normal' remotedesktop session. A second connect with the same credentials kicks the first connect.
If a remoteApp is used instead of the 'normal' connect, it's possible to start multiple instances of this app within one user a least from one computer. mstsc do run multiple times and seem to link in the existent connection without kicking it. How to change
that?
Continuative:
The started RemoteApp checks the mutex of all started processes and stops herself if a process is found with the same mutex. This prevents multiple instances of this app within one user with the same sessionID. If a terminalserver is configured for only
one session per user, this RemoteApp shouldn't start multiple within one user. Using a "normal" remote desktop session the app doesn't start more than one time, I tested it. Used as RemotApp, the app starts multiple! Possibly I'm able to change this behaviour
with a code fix instead of configuring terminal services. Any tips regarding mutex and terminalservers?

Hi,
I tested the following code and it is working for me both in a RemoteApp and Full session:
Imports System.Threading
Module Main
Sub Main()
Dim createdNew As Boolean
Dim m As New Mutex(True, "TPMutex", createdNew)
If Not createdNew Then
Return
End If
Application.Run(Form1)
GC.KeepAlive(m)
End Sub
End Module
-TP

How to set a keyframe with setValueAtTime for only one axis?

Hi,
I´d like to set a keyframe for the layer´s scale, anchor point values but separately. Let´s say I want to add the following keyframes to a layer:
time: 0, value: 100, axis: X
time: 0.3, value: 10, axis: Y
time: 1, value: 110, axis: X
If I use setValueAtTime(time ,[x, y]) it always places a keyframe for both axis.
How can I set a keyframe with setValueAtTime for only one axis?
Regards,
Thomas

Dan, thanks for your fast reply. But the problem is a bit difficult to describe for a german like me
I´m try to convert given keyframes from another application. Let me visually show how it handles keyframes that are set on different axis at different times:
X: O---O---O
Y: ---O--O-O
You see when the user sets a keyframe and both axis were modified, both have a keyframe (see the last key). But if only one axis is transformed and the other not, there is only one keyframe. The problem that I try to solve is that AE is only able to set a keyframe for both axis at a given time. So if I set the 3 keyframes of the X axis first, the AE script will set keys on the Y axis simultaneously. That´s bad because it adds keyframe to the other axis where there is no value "cache". So if I would set all keyframes it would look like this:
X: O--•O-•-O
Y: •--O•-O-O
The small dots indicate those "forced" in-between keys.
So is there a "native" scripting way to separate the dimensions (like the position prop) for other props and add independent keyframes?

How can I correct that emails for only one of my address going direct to my trash file before even being read and this just started a while back not before?

have been living with this for a while, do not remember when it started and have already try different ways a solving the problem but nothing has corrected the situation.

thanks for ur suggestion, no help. still goes to trash for only one of my email addresses, other two no problem.

Tacacs authentication fails for one user account for only one switch

Hi,
I am having an scenario, where as Tacacs authentication fails for one user account for only one switch.
The same user account works well for other devices.
The AAA configs are same on every devices in the network.
Heres the show tacacs output from the switch where only one user account fails;
              Socket opens:        157
             Socket closes:        156
             Socket aborts:        303
             Socket errors:          1
           Socket Timeouts:          2
   Failed Connect Attempts:          0
        Total Packets Sent:       1703
        Total Packets Recv:       1243
          Expected Replies:          0
What could be the reason ?
No errors on ACS server; same rights had been given to the user account.
Thanks to advise.
Prasey

Hi there,
Does the user get authenticated in the ACS logs?
reports and activity----> failed attempts
ro
reports and activity-----> passed authentications
That will help narrow it down.
Brad

Can I show a data label for only one point in a series?

Forgive a newbie question from an Excel convert, but can I show a value label for only one point in a data series? If yes, how?
There are a number of graphs where I only want to value of either an extreme value or the ending value to show. Having all the labels in a series makes the chart too busy. This is pretty easy to do in Excel.
If this can't be done, I guess that adding a text box over those points would work.
Thanks

Hi W-T,
Welcome to Apple Discussions and the Numbers '09 forum.
wahoo_tiger wrote:
Forgive a newbie question from an Excel convert, but can I show a value label for only one point in a data series? If yes, how?
Sure. Here's and example labeling only the MIN and MAX points.
Column B contains the data charted with the blue line.
Column C extracts the MIN and MAX values using the formula below. Those two values are charted as a separate series, using the green data point markers, and are labeled with their values. The intervening empty string values appear to have doused the lines connecting the two data points.
Formula: =IF(OR(B=MAX(B),B=MIN(B)),B,"")
Regards,
Barry

Changing DB character set for only one schema

We are interested in changing the characterset of only one user from Western European to AL32UTF8.
Could you please verify if the following steps will be correct to do the same.
1. Run CSScan on the one user
2. Fix any issues
3. Export that one user (with NLS_LANG set to <your old database character set>)
4. Create a new database in the AL32UTF8 character set
5. Import that one user into the new database (with NLS_LANG set to <your old database character set>)

Actually your title is a little incorrect. You are not changing CS for only one schema in existing DB which is not possible. You are trying to migrate a schema to new CS DB. Which is totally doable and your approach is mostly correct.
Database Character Set Scanner provide user scan mode
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14225/ch12scanner.htm#i1006013
Mostly the issue could be data truncation, especially if you have column defined using char or varchar2 vs nchar and nvarchar2
because char/varchar is defined in bytes, AL32UTF8 is multi-bytes char set, some character of your old data could saved more than 1 bytes in new DB and can't fit into the column size.

Apple apps store do double charged me for only one application purchased and i can't find an email of apple customer service.

Apple apps store do double charged me for only one application purchased and i can't find an email of apple customer service.
<Email Edited By Host>

These are user-to-user forums - I've asked the hosts to remove your email address from your post.
Tou can contact iTunes support here : http://www.apple.com/support/itunes/contact/ - click on Contact iTunes Store Support on the right-hand side of the page

EA2: Code is generated for only one column with Domain check constraint.

I created a Domain with a Value List (Y or N - Yes or No) and used that domain for two columns in the same table. But for only one column (the last one) the check appears in the generated DDL.
After I enabled the "Use Domain Constraints" both checks appear in the DDL, but one as an inline check constraint and one as an "Alter table add contraint.."
Once I changed the naming Template for the check constraint, both constraints are generated as an Alter table clause. The inline check constraint is only generated when the name of the constraint (according to the template) is too long. It would be nice if I could choose if I want an inline or a separate check constraint definition.
Edited by: Roel on Nov 23, 2010 11:55 AM
Edited by: Roel on Nov 23, 2010 12:02 PM

I logged ER for that
Philip

PDF file not generating for only one Invoice billing document

Hi all,
We have upgraded our system into ECC6.0 from 4.7 version. During our Testing time, we have found the following Bug:
Bug: Not possible to get output in pdf format for only one Invoice type(TR code: VF02) except for all it is generating PDF output.
Can anybody help me out to find the route cause for this problem.
Regards,
Murali.

Hi,
For one Billing-Invoice type , PDF is not generating. But it is generating for other Invoices.
So should i need to go through the Printer settings?
Regards,
Murali.

Program installed for only one user

Have a program that is installed for only one user, how can I get another user access to the software? don't have install disk.
Thanks

Select the application's icon then Press COMMAND-I to open the Get Info window. In the Ownership and Sharing section check the owner and group assignments. If they have owner=you and group=you or staff, then you must change those. Open the Terminal application in the Utilities folder and enter the following command line at the prompt:
sudo chown -R root:admin
Put a space after "admin' then drag the application's icon into the Terminal window and press RETURN. You will be prompted for your admin password which will not be echoed.
This should enable other users to access the application provided you have given the user access via their managed account preferences in Accounts preferences.

ChaRM scenario for only one productive system

Hi CHaRM-experts!
I would like to know whether or not is it possible to use the Change Request Management scenarion for only one productive system?
It means we have systems and cases where we should apply the emergency correction only in productive system, without any transport from DEV or QAS system.
Does ChaRM support such case?
Thank you very much!
regards
Thom

Hi Don,
thank you very much for your answer.
No, I do not plan any transport in the productive system.
I would just make any adminstrative changes without transport.
Does ChaRM support such scenarios?
Thank you!
regards
Thom

Restriction for only one chief position per organizational unit.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for