Restriction not lifted!!!!!!!

BT restricted my line over a week ago, I owed them £45 which I was in dispute with them over a dongle charge they'd put on my account (see this thread about the lovely wait I had to be connected and why I had a dongle in the first place! http://community.bt.com/t5/BT-Infinity/still-waiting-to-be-connected/m-p/810618 ) There was no warning for this restriction!!
So anyway, on the 3rd May 2013, I paid the £45 and by which time the next bill had come in which wasn't due til' the 8th May, but I paid it anyway (5 days early) So they were paid £130+, we're now on the 11th May and my line is still restricted, I try to make a call, it goes through to BT telling me I haven't paid my bill, I then speak to a person who puts me through to billing, billing say's there is no restriction and put me through to faults, faults say there is no fault on my line and billing need to lift the restriction and put me back to billing, billing say there is no restriction and put me back to faults, faults put me back to billing, billing put me back to faults!!!!!!!! Now I'm on another 'restriction will be lifted in 24hrs'!! I have no doubt that this time tomorrow I will go through the same 'BT groundhog day'!!
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hi
I am sorry to see you are having problems
I suggest you contact the forum mods they should be able to get this problem sorted for you this is a link to them http://bt.custhelp.com/app/contact_email/c/4951
They normally reply by email or phone directly to you within 3 working days they will take personal ownership of your problem until resolved and will keep you informed of progress
They are a UK based BT specialist team who have a good record at getting problems solved
This is a customer to customer self help forum the only BT presence here are the forum moderators
If you want to say thanks for a helpful answer,please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side If the reply answers your question then please mark as ’Mark as Accepted Solution’

Similar Messages

How can we restricted not to change the bach no in GR

Hi All,
When we do MIGO with ref to P.O or With ref to Out bound delivery , how can we restricted not to change the bach no.
Please guide me.
Thanks and Regards
Chandru

Hi Chandrashekar,
I am assuming that, you dont want batch to be changed duirng GR for a PO, but you can choose from existing batches in the system.
in SPRO->logistic General->batch management->Creation of New batches->Define Batch creation for goods movement.
Here you can control the way the batches can be popolated. Varous option are available which can be used too.
Please make detail process validation defore usign this option.
Please reward if useful.
thx,
MJ

How to restrict not more than 9 hrs in Timesheet

Hi
Is there any way to restrict not more than 9 hrs in Timesheet in PWA 2010
Regards
Santhu

Hi Santhu,
In server settings, timesheet settings, set the maximum hours per timesheet:
Hope this helps.
Guillaume Rouyre - MBA, MCP, MCTS

If i restrict #Not included in Global Filters what will do exactly

Hi
If i restrict #Not included in Global Filters what will do exactly
Regards
ramu

Hi ,
In the Global filters if you are exulding #, then your every keyfigure will be restricted by that . That mean you will not see any record for the infoobject with # value in it .
You can also imagine, that if you restrict all the keyfigures in the report by exculding #, it will be same as above .
Hope the above reply was helpful.
Thanks & Regards,
Ashutosh Singh

Restrictions not working in BO Webi Report

Hello,
I have created a universe on BEx query. Now on this universe when i create reports with restrictions the restrictions are not working.
For example:
If i create a BO query with restriction say Doc_Number= 108994 and display Doc_Number and Delivery_Number then:
in Doc_Number column i get 108994 but in Delivery_Number column i get all the delivery numbers from the cube. In other words all Delivery_Numbers are retrieved when i restrict data for one Doc_Number and vice versa is also true.
Can anyone help me solve this issue?

Hello,
If i remove all the filters and include any of key figures then i get correct data.
But if i remove the key figure and apply a restriction say on Delivery_Number then i get incorrect data.
I too believe that ideally this should not happen.
eg:
Doc_NumDelivery_Number
111                      1010
222                      1234
333                      5678
Now if i include Doc_Num and Delivery_Number in query and apply filter Delivery_Number = 1010 then the output is
Doc_Num           Delivery_Number
111                      1010
222                      1010
333                      1010
Same is the case if i apply filter on Doc_Num i get all Delivery_Number.
What should be the reason behind such behaviour of the query????

Restriction not working up properly in Query

Hi,
In BI Backend, i have 2 Info Objects in my Infocube, Movement type & Posting date. There are totally 3 movement types, A B & C. In my Query, i have to show up the posting date based on the Movement types in seperate columns. Say, Movement type A column should show the posting dates assigned to A.
I created a Calculated Key figure with Replacement path Formula Variable using Posting date. I restricted this CKF with the Movement type A. Similarly i created 2 more RKF's for B & C.
But, when i execute the query, I am getting the posting date value for all the rows in the 3 columns, which should not happen. As per actual, a particular row should have posting date value for only one of the movement types but in my case all the movement type columns are getting posting date value for a particular row.
I am not sure where things went wrong. Any help on this is highly appreciated.
Regards,
Murali

Hi,
My Output should be as follows:
     MT-A                MT-B               MT-C
12.09.2011
                         11.10.2011
                         01.09.2011
                                                 03.10.2011
23.01.2011
But my Output is as follows:
     MT-A                MT-B               MT-C
12.09.2011       12.09.2011      12.09.2011
11.10.2011       11.10.2011      11.10.2011
01.09.2011       01.09.2011      01.09.2011
03.10.2011       03.10.2011      03.10.2011
23.01.2011       23.01.2011      23.01.2011
Please revert back for any further clarifications.
Regards,
Murali

IP address restrictions not working with bea weblogic plugin

We want to implement IP address restrictions via the Sun Java One Web Server admin tool for our application. We are using the Sun Java One Web Server to proxy requests via the Bea Weblogic plugin. However, we cannot get IP address restrictions to work because of the leading asterisk in the following NSAPI entry for PPATH of obj.conf :
<Object name="weblogic" ppath="*/cmcsr/*"> Service fn="wl_proxy" WebLogicCluster="10.156.20.11:9010,\
10.156.20.12:9010,10.156.20.13:9010" DynamicServerList="OFF"
</Object>
Has anyone gotten IP restrictions to work with the bea Weblogic NSAPI plugin?

I'm not sure what you're asking, but each Service directive should be on its own line. It is an error to have both a <Client> tag and Service directive on a single line.

Family Base restrictions not working

We setup a family base account per the instructions and video. The time restrictions seem to be working fine but the list of trusted numbers is not working. Our son is still able to send and receive text messages through his iPhone 4 to anybody unless we specifically block their number on the Verizon account.
We found that even with Family Base restrictions setup, imessage bypasses those restrictions so we turned off imessage on his phone and setup restrictions on his iPhone itself. This stopped him from being able to use the imessage feature of the iPhone but people who are not setup in his trusted numbers are still able to get text messages through. We're frustrated because the family base is not working the way it's supposed to and we're being charge for this "feature."

Hi Billiam!
I'm sorry for any inconvenience with your son's iPhone 4 and the Family Base feature. Upon review of this feature, I see that the child companion app is not compatible with the iPhone device. Some features will work, and some will not, but this is due to the design of the iPhone. Here is some additional information for you: http://vz.to/15gGAxd
ChristinaB_VZW
Follow us on Twitter @VZWSupport
If my response answered your question please click the "Correct Answer" button under my response. This ensures others can benefit from our conversation. Thanks in advance for your help with this!!

Password to enable restrictions not working

My password for enabling restrictions is not working. I don't even remembering setting it actually. I would have made it easy but what I think it could be is not working. how can I unlock it?

Just try a Restore with iTunes.
Otherwise you can try this; http://www.simonblog.com/2011/03/16/how-to-recover-forgotten-iphone-restrictions -passcode/

Configure restrictions not listed in Apple Configurator?

I work in a school to deploy iPads to be used by 11-16 year olds. Apple configurator seemed like the tool to use, and indeed has proven invaluable in setting up the iPads and deploying applications.
The Apple Configurator has a section where you can define restrictions, which is useful to stop improper use.
However not all restrictions available in iOS are configurable here. Users can even completely reset the iPad.
Is there a method to mass configure these restrictions, or am I out of luck?

What are you restricting right now?

Character restrict not working

Hi, I'm trying to restrict the characters in my input text
field to digits only (0-9) -- it's an age restriction. But for some
reason it's not working. Here is my code:
var age = "";
ageRestrict = function () {
age.restrict = "0-9";
ageRestrict();
Also, if I don't use var age = ""; it will say undefined when
I publisht he movie. Why is that?
What am i doing wrong?
Thanks
A
Text

If you read the Flash help about the restrict property, it's
a property
of a TextField -- i.e. not of a variable and not of the
textfield's
"variable" property.
What is the instance name of your input textfield? The
restriction
should be as simple as:
myInputTFInstanceName.restrict = "0-9"
smash wrote:
> Hi, I'm trying to restrict the characters in my input
text field to digits only
> (0-9) -- it's an age restriction. But for some reason
it's not working. Here is
> my code:
>
> var age = "";
>
> ageRestrict = function () {
> age.restrict = "0-9";
> };
> ageRestrict();
>
> Also, if I don't use var age = ""; it will say undefined
when I publisht he
> movie. Why is that?
>
> What am i doing wrong?
>
> Thanks

Reply to all restriction not working

We have an "everyone distro group that we setup delivery restrictions on. It is set too "Only senders in the following list". We had one of these allowed users send out a email to everyone. Then someone who is not on that list was able to
reply all and it was sent to "everyone". Is there another setting I can check. We really need this restriction. Thanks.

Weird thing is, they do get the warning message that they "Do not have permission to send to:". This happens when they reply or compose a new email. We have a Universal distro group setup with an alias. I created a test group configured the same
way and it does work.
You mean the restrictions work for the test group?
Hmmm, Can you recreate the group the doesn't work?
Twitter!: Please Note: My Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied.

Identity Restriction Not subscribed please turn off the feature and try again

Hi, I have BB Curve 9300 and I am getting this error since I landed in mumbai. This is preventing me to make calls.

Hi and Welcome to the Community!
Having no idea where you came "from", we can only guess that you are presently roaming on a different carrier and/or have shifted from your home carrier SIM to a local one in Mumbai. As such, the message is likely quite clear...you have configured, in the settings for your phone app, identity restriction, but it is not supported by the carrier you are presently operating on. You need to go into the phone app settings and turn it off.
Good luck!
Occam's Razor nearly always applies when troubleshooting technology issues!
If anyone has been helpful to you, please show your appreciation by clicking the button inside of their post. Please click here and read, along with the threads to which it links, for helpful information to guide you as you proceed. I always recommend that you treat your BlackBerry like any other computing device, including using a regular backup schedule...click here for an article with instructions.
Join our BBM Channels
BSCF General Channel
PIN: C0001B7B4 Display/Scan Bar Code
Knowledge Base Updates
PIN: C0005A9AA Display/Scan Bar Code

Restrictions not restricting

Hopefully you guys can help. I am trying to restrict an app my nephew purchased....I know I can not completely delete the app once it's purchased, so I placed restrictions on what can be downloaded from the App Store. However, even with the restriction on, I am still able to download or repurchase the app that my nephew purchased. For some reason it's not being included in what's be restricted...

Hello Luz1990,
Once an app is purchased, it can be downloaded again and again any time.
However, if you totally want to restrict the app downloads from your nephew
you could toggle the App Store button ithe Restrictions section.
The app disappears if you do so.
Another alternative to restrict the downloads is you can restrict the age limit
of type of apps to be downloaded in the restrictions section

E3000 Deny Access Restrictions not releasing

I've just recently purchased a Cisco E3000 router.
I've set up 3 Access Restriction - Deny policies using IP addresses.  Unless someone has a better idea I found I needed two policies to Deny from late at night (say 10.00pm) till first thing the next morning. As this spans two days I needed a Deny policy from 10pm till midnight, and another for the next day from midnight till say 7.00am.
Now to my problem, the laptops get 'Deny'ed exactly as they should within a few minutes of the set time, problem is they do not reconnect the next morning after the Deny time has passed.
Cisco help wasn't any help, and wanted me to use Cisco Connect. However the overly simplistic options it provides are next to useless for me.   The web option has more flexibility, if only it'd work.
Do I need to need to force an Allow to override the Deny but establishing a fifth policy just for this purpose? Don't know if this'll work but I've got no other ideas.
All help greatly appreciated

Anyhow, I'll answer my own question based on one nights experience.
Made the 5th (and last, don't know why all the reviews say you can have 10 policies, there are only 5) an Allow policy for the previously restricted IP addresses with the parameters of Allow everyday for 24 hours.
Last night the Deny policies as the first in the list worked correctly and the two restricted laptops had access back again at the set time. So on a test of one night it's all working correctly.
The trick was the inclusion of a universal Allow policy as the last policy to force a release of the Deny policies. I'll post again if it doesn't work at some point in the future.

Restriction not lifted!!!!!!!

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for