Restriction of Need by Date in Planner workbench release against blanket PO

Hi ,
Needed some information on this query below :
==================================================
For normal blanket PO, if the effective date is till 31-Jul-06 and if a release is done on this Blanket PO , with the need by date as ( example 02-Sep-06) , it still goes and does a release . There is no problem.
But in the planner workbench release, if the need by date is greater than the BPO effective date , it does not allow to release ...
Is this a constraint or any setup or any Profile blocking from doing this release ?
Thanks
Anil

Sandeep,
Thank yo for your information. Are you suggesting that we write an SQL report to identfy the POs which we want to update the PO Need By Date, then we utilize the Purchasing Documents Open Interface to update the PO Need By Date?
Or would there be another way to do it from the ASCP workbench?
We are talking about a few thousand POs ... so we need to automate.
Thanks,
Joe

Similar Messages

ESYU: Planner Workbench Release process가 다른 user로부터 planned orders를 release

Purpose
Materials Requirement Planning - Version: 11.5.9 to 12.1
Information in this document applies to any platform.
11.5.9 ~ R12 version:
두 명의 users가 MRP Planner Workbench에서 Release를 위해 records updating을 진행하는 경우, 두 명 중 한명만이 update 후 실제로 release를
submit 했으나 두 명 user의 모든 records가 release 되어 버린다.
User1은 자신의 Planned Orders 만을 release 할 수 있고, User2 또한 자신의 저장된 Planned Orders 만을 release 해야 한다.
STEPS:
1. User 1이 MRP Planned Workbench로 log
2. User 1은 특정 planner code를 위한 current planned order recommendations 을 찾는다.
3. User 2가 MRP Planned Workbench로 log
4. User 2가 특정 planner code를 위한 current planned order recommendations 을 찾는다.
5. User1은 All for Release를 선택
6. User2도 All for Release를 선택
7. User1은 checking process를 끝낸 후 저장
8. User2는 아직 checking process를 끝내지 못해 save를 아지 않은 상태로 남아 있다.
9. User1이 [Release] button을 선택
10. User1이 [Release] button을 선택시 User1과 User2에 의해 저장되거나 check 된 모든 planned order recommendations이 Work in Process와
Puchasing modules로 released 되어 버림
Cause
이 issue의 원인은 현재 MRP planning의 경우 expected functionality 이다.
MRP Workbench Release process는 모든 planner에 의해 check 되거나 저장된 모든 planned orders를 항상 release 한다.
Bug 891669 : Enhancement Request
PLANNER'S WORKBENCH SHOULD RELEASE ORDERS BASED ON PLANNER NAME NOT BY BATCH
It is explained that this is current functionality in the following rejected Enhancement Request:
Bug 891669 : PLANNER'S WORKBENCH SHOULD RELEASE ORDERS BASED ON PLANNER NAME NOT BY BATCH
Solution
Solution을 적용하기 위해 아래 steps을 실행:
1. 모든 planner에 의해 check 되거나 저장된 모든 planned orders가 [Release] button에 의해 항상 release 되는것은 현재 MRP Workbench
Release process에서는 correct functionality 이다.
2. ASCP Planning의 경우엔 Planner/User에 의해 Release process가 아래 option에 의해 처리 가능하다.
-- profile MSC:Released Only By User
-- Standard MRP에서는 이 option은 사용할 수 없고 고려되지 않는다.
Reference
Note 311053.1

Is there any method to stop rescheduling of the PO Need By date from ATP if there is any holiday specified in shipping calender. The requirement is to update the schedule ship date on Sales Order but the lead time of Purchase Order should not increase

We are currently not able to manage schedule ship date proposed by ATP when our warehouse is closed. For example , we would like that ATP doesn't propose any schedule ship date for the first of May , which is a non working day in France. The constraint is that we don't want our purchase need by date to be impacted by the process.
I tried to closed one day in FR1 calendar and, after testing with order management, it appears that ATP didn't propose the closed day, so that's fine, but, our purchase order lead time was increased of 1 day and this is not what we expected.
Can you help us to find the right process.
Thanks

Hi Sandeep,
when we try to Rescheduled out the PO and the request is errored out the with the error:-
Start of log messages from FND_FILE
reschedule fails
old date in planner workbench: 19-MAY-11
new date: 07-JUN-11
header: 417474
line: 605652
po number: 2049031859
shipment no: 1
The need by date/promised date in the source instance is not the same as the need by date/promised date in the destination instance.
In the source instance,
The need by date is 19-MAY-11, and the promised date is 19-MAY-11
End of log messages from FND_FILE
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scheduled ship date not taking PO need by date

1. Please consider following case -
a. Sales order is created for org UK for item A for 10000 qty 24-Mar-2011 with order request date as 29-Mar-2011.
a1. There is no on-hand in UK for item A.
a2. The item lead time for item A, as defined in UK org in item attributes’ Lead times tab, is as following -
a21. Pre-processing time - 4 days
a22. Processing time - 20 days
a23. Post-Processing time - 1 day
a3. A standard purchase order for item A is created for 15000 quantity on 25-Mar-2011 with Need by date as 10-Apr-2011.
a4. The ATP rule that is attached to the item, is having Purchase orders checked, under supply sources.
Observation : Before purchase order creation, the scheduled ship date on SO was 28-Apr-2011 (item lead time of 25 days).
Then the PO is created as in point a3 and ASCP plan was run. The sales order line for item A is unscheduled and Rescheduled, the scheduled ship date becomes 25-Apr-2011.
Questions :
1.     Why did the scheduled ship date change to 25-Apr-2011?
2.     What all things it is taking into consideration?
3.     As per our understanding, the scheduled ship date should have been changed to PO Need by date. But this didn’t happen. Is our understanding flawed?

Hi Sandeep,
when we try to Rescheduled out the PO and the request is errored out the with the error:-
Start of log messages from FND_FILE
reschedule fails
old date in planner workbench: 19-MAY-11
new date: 07-JUN-11
header: 417474
line: 605652
po number: 2049031859
shipment no: 1
The need by date/promised date in the source instance is not the same as the need by date/promised date in the destination instance.
In the source instance,
The need by date is 19-MAY-11, and the promised date is 19-MAY-11
End of log messages from FND_FILE
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I need to restrict users to submit data from Smart view or Excel Addin.

Hi All,
I need to restrict users to submit data from Smart view or Excel Addin.
I cant provision them as read access because I want them to write from the Hyperion Planning Web Form.
Any help on the same will be highily appriciated.

John,
Thanks for the reply . if i dont give them essbase write role user cant submit data through smartview or Excel addin. at the same users want to see adhoc reports making connection in smartview through planning, then users can send data.
1. I want users to restrict export dataform to smartview, if they can export dataform to smartview it automatically makes connection using planning and users can pretty much change data.
2. is there any way to restrict users making connection through planning in smartview.
3. when users make smartview connection through essbase, the secuirty works fine and they cant change the data.
Please let me know if you any solution ....
advance thanks,
NM

I need code to get Action Column in MPS Planner Workbench Supply form( R 12)

Hi All,
I need Code to get Action Column that available in Supply form of MPS Planner Workbench .
I need to have it in my report. we don't have Advanced Chain Installed.
Thank you.

Dear All,
Kindly Support...

'Resource Usage' field in Planner workbench

Hi,
Currently the 'Resource Usage' field in Planner Workbench > Item > Routing Operation > Resources doesn't not display decimal places.
What do I need to change in profile option or preference or anywhere else so that atleast 1 place after decimal is display. In the database column this field has data with decimal places.
Thanks

Hi Geert,
Thanks for the advice.
I put '1' decimal place in Capacity Plan but it didn't work. Then I entered same value in all decimal places in all tab in Preferences, then it worked.
Thanks
Dee

Need By Date Should be equal or after the effective start date- error in po_requisitions_interface_all

Hi All,
We have created a manual planned order for one buy item in ASCP workbench for some qty and released it.
But, we are not able to get its requisition created in source.
When we check the PO_Interface _Errors table, we found that it is errored out with error as --
Need By Date Should be equal or after the effective start date .
Can anyone please help me out to find the cause of this issue. Any help/pointer in this regard will be highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Avinash

Hi Abhishek,
We found the root cause of the issue.
Its BPA was not having any Effective start date mentioned in its terms. So we put it as BPA creation date and ran the data collection and plan run.
After that we were able to see its BPA release created without any error.
Thanks,
Avinash

Restrict access to ztable data

Hi all,
I have one ztable for password. and our user have authorisation of SE16 so that they can able to access that table data easily.
They need this authorisation for accessing other table data.So I want to restrict that perticular ztable data access only.
Thanks.

Hii,
Check this thread,[Link|Restrict access to Particular ZTABLE via SE16...;
This will solve ur problem.
Regards,
Archana

ASCp - Planner Workbench, PO in receicing order type record

Dear Friends,
In ASCP, Planner Workbench ,under a plan, supply and ddemand screen has an order type "PO in receicving" with firm flag enabled with future date for due dates
We could see all the PO's for that item is closed. On hand Quantities also got increased based on that PO receipts.
Can you please let me know, what does that mean by "PO in receicving" order type record and how for a closed PO's it is being shown?
Thanks,
Ganesh

Hi Ganesh,
The closed PO's should not be there and shouldn't have PO in Receiving status either.
But the reason why you must be seeing this is because there is still a record in MTL_SUPPLY for this PO with supply type code as RECEIVING and hence its still
appearing in ASCP.
Please go by the below article if the supply is still shown in RECEIVING but PO's are completed and run the mentioned queries to diagnose and get the inventory transaction fixed.
Fully Received / Delivered / Finally Closed Po Line Still Appearing in Item Supply / Demand Form MS and RS (Doc ID 1364291.1)
Moreover, if you started seeing this issue more often then the best way is to put the piece of code in the collections hook i.e MSC_CL_CLEANSE API to purge the supplies from ODS if PO's are closed for those.
Thanks,
Abhishek Sharma
Please mark the post correct or helpful, if answered

Need by Date Planned Order

Hi All,
A simple question.
For the purchased items, I am reviewing planned orders.
I see following dates -
Sugg Due Date - Date the Purchased Item will be consumed by the FG work orders - ASCP Calculated from the demand
Sugg Dock Date - date on which Items will be received in the plant = Sugg Due Date - Post Processing LT
Sugg Order Date - Date on which we should place order with supplier = Sugg Dock Date - Processing LT
Sugg Start Date - Date on which we should start preparing order = Sugg Order Date - Pre Processing LT
There is another date 'Need By Date' suggested for these planned orders. What is this date? How is this calculated?
Appreciate response on this.

Hello..
MRP can generated need by date PR base on what day lead time do you set.
there have 3 kind of lead time type,
1. Pre processing lead time
2. Processing lead time
3. post processing lead time
if you set up all of that leadtime, you will find "suggested dock date" in MRP workbench.
need by date PR is take from suggested dock date in MRP workbench.
and add info, suggested dock date can generated if you set processing leadtime.
hope this help and CMIAW
the pooh

Performance of ASCP Planner Workbench

Hi All,
I am facing a strange issue with ASCP Planner Workbench. We got a centralized instance. For TST instance, complete refresh is run and data is collected. Gather Schema Statistics run successfully with 40%. ASCP plan is run successfully.
Now while opening planner workbench, the planner workbench query hangs. Few queries work but then hangs again for the next step. Foe example: - If I run query to find specific item then query hangs. If it runs successfully ( after a long time) and I want to query Supply and Demand for specific item then again it hangs.
This is highly frustrating situation.
Request your input on what can be the issue and the resolutions if any.
Regards,
Yash

Hi Ganesh,
The closed PO's should not be there and shouldn't have PO in Receiving status either.
But the reason why you must be seeing this is because there is still a record in MTL_SUPPLY for this PO with supply type code as RECEIVING and hence its still
appearing in ASCP.
Please go by the below article if the supply is still shown in RECEIVING but PO's are completed and run the mentioned queries to diagnose and get the inventory transaction fixed.
Fully Received / Delivered / Finally Closed Po Line Still Appearing in Item Supply / Demand Form MS and RS (Doc ID 1364291.1)
Moreover, if you started seeing this issue more often then the best way is to put the piece of code in the collections hook i.e MSC_CL_CLEANSE API to purge the supplies from ODS if PO's are closed for those.
Thanks,
Abhishek Sharma
Please mark the post correct or helpful, if answered

Mrp planner workbench inactive

Hi All
need help..
Why suddenly my MRP Planner workbench is inactive?
when I 've done running MRP. What processes can cause this?
thanks.
the pooh

Hi,
To understand more clearly, Please let me know below
Able to navigate to workbench through Menu?
Further, selecting the respective plan, are you able to select respecting plan workbench?
Would like to know, whether you are not at all query in WB or able to query but getting empty result in WB?
Thanks,
Ram

How to update need by date in Purchase order using an API?

Hi All,
Is there any API available in 11i which can be used to update the need by date in purchase order?
There is a API PO_CHANGE_API1_S.UPDATE_PO, but it updates only the promise date and not the need by date.
Please help !!
Thanks & Regards
Anuj

Your error comes from Sybase, so I suggest you post your question to a Sybase forum. And be aware that Sybase does not use the same tsql dialect as sql server, so you must use their dialect (if, indeed, there is any difference in this particular situation).
One note - there should be no space between "N" and the Unicode string literal to which it applies in tsql. E.g.,
= N'Executive Chair эюя'
not
= N 'Executive Chair эюя'

I need a data transfer from intact hard drive of older macbook that won't boot. Can Apple provide this service even though my one to one membership has expired?

I need a data transfer from a 2005 Macbook to my new one (2010). I damaged the old laptop and although it wouldn't turn on, when I brought it to the Apple Store they ascertained that the hard drive was still intact. They said I needed to purchase a one to one membership to get a data transfer, which I did, but somehow forgot about it and now it's expired. Is there any way I can still get the data from the old hard drive transferred to my new macbook? Can Apple provide this service even though my one to one membership has expired?

Go to OWC where you can purchase a suitable enclosure for the drive. You will need an enclosure for a SATA notebook drive. This is assuming the old computer is a MacBook and not an iBook. I make this observation because the first MacBook was released in 2006, not in 2005. If yours is a 2005 model then it's an iBook and uses an ATA interface.
Install the old drive in the enclosure, connect to your new computer. You can then transfer your data.

Restriction of Need by Date in Planner workbench release against blanket PO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for