Restriction of the connection

I want to restrict the number of simultaneous connection on WeblogicServer
5.1 SP9.
Are there any methods?
Thank you in advance.

Originally posted by: none.us.ibm.com
Most people put the connections on a layer above the "big figure" so that
z-order is easily maintained.
"Cleverson Schmidt" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:d99885c55db8d40a3d3a060b4e83b407$[email protected]..
> Hi,
>
> What are the restrictions when we will create connections among nodes? I
> mean in plain draw2D, not considering GEF stuff.
> I'm asking this question because I haven't managed yet to add connections
> among the nodes of my application. What would be the correct approach?
> I have one big Figure with all my nodes(other Figures).
> Do I have to create one outer figure and then add the big figure and
> another figure just for connections? Is there any restriction on layouts
> of the connection figure?
>
> Thank you
>
> Cleverson Schmidt
>
>

Similar Messages

  • HT1976 I am in turkey. Just bought a new Turkcell SIM card for my iphone3gs. When I try to connect to Turkcell network, it says that the selected network is restricted however the sim works in ordinary phones. Can you help please.

    I am in turkey. Just bought a new Turkcell SIM card for my iphone3gs. When I try to connect to Turkcell network, it says that the selected network is restricted however the sim works in ordinary phones. Can you help please.

    If a phone is sold from one friend to another and wants to use it on a different carrier the friend can contact the carrier it was sold by to request it unlocked.  I know AT&T, Verizon, and Sprint will give you the steps to unlock it as long as the original contract it was bought under has been completed.  eBay/Craigslist is really not the best place to try to get "unlocked phones" from, if it turns out the phone isn't unlocked then I'm really sorry you got stuck with that one and as stevejobsfan said above I would report them immediately and see if you can recover your money.  I sell phones for a living and this happens a lot

  • Experiencing near-constant the connection was reset error.

    For about the last 3 months, I've had two seemingly-related problems: 1] "The connection was reset/interrupted" error; and 2] web pages loading in a primitive, odd-looking form. Both used to occur every once in a while, but now they're near-constant, to the point that doing anything online is at best a struggle and at worst impossible. The error is especially bad: makes it extremely difficult to reach a web page, load it completely, or do anything should I ever get there (searches, clicking links, etc.). Might be even worse with some sites than others, but it's hard to tell-- seems pretty bad wherever I go on the web. As far as I can tell, this started when I was still using Waterfox, and updated to 32.0.3; I recently switched back to Firefox in hopes of escaping it, but found the same thing happening there. I've tried the suggestions given in the forums (like clearing the cache, removing cookies, pressing Shift while reloading, pressing Ctrl + F5 [for Windows], etc.), as well as uninstalling and re-installing Waterfox, but nothing works. Since my own computer skills are modest at best, I've pretty much run out of troubleshooting options at this point. What I'm looking for is a solution to this, rather than just ways of coping with it. Does anyone know what's wrong and how to fix it? Will it be solved by the next Firefox update? And is there another browser you can recommend as a replacement for Firefox? I'm really at the end of my rope here; please help!
    As of 02/26/15, still having the same problem. I've tried scanning for malware (didn't find any) and configuring Windows firewall for Firefox (made no difference). I've noticed that there's a more accurate description for what I'm experiencing than the one I originally posted: web pages can rarely finish loading anymore, unless they're very short (and often not even then)-- if I wait for them to do so, the error usually occurs. Some are usable if I stop the loading process before the error shows up, but many (most?) won't work that way (not enough ever makes it onscreen). Seems like this site is largely unaffected, but places like rogerebert.com or TV Tropes are pretty much inaccessible to me now. Is anybody still interested in helping me solve this? Because I'm about ready to give up on Firefox for good at this point. Please save me from resorting to Google Chrome or, god forbid, Internet Explorer!

    ''iamjayakumars [[#answer-685843|said]]''
    <blockquote>
    What security software (firewall, anti-virus) do you have? <br>
    It is possible that your security software (firewall, anti-virus) blocks or restricts Firefox or the plugin-container process without informing you, possibly after detecting changes (update) to the Firefox program. <br>
    Remove all rules for Firefox and the plugin-container from the permissions list in the firewall and let your firewall ask again for permission to get full, unrestricted, access to install for Firefox and the plugin-container process and the updater process. <br>
    See: <br>
    *https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Server+not+found
    *https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Firewalls
    *https://support.mozilla.org/kb/fix-problems-connecting-websites-after-updating
    </blockquote>
    Re: my security software: I use Windows Firewall and Microsoft Security Essentials (also Malwarebytes Anti-Malware, if that helps).
    I've now tried the above link's instructions for configuring Windows Firewall to allow Firefox access. It may have helped slightly with the error (which seems to be happening a bit less often); however, the primitive-looking-web-page problem is if anything worse, pages are INCREDIBLY slow to load, and the error remains frequent (can't tell if this possible respite is just temporary, or even mere wishful thinking on my part). In any case, though, my original problem hasn't been solved yet.

  • Error message when loading "The connection to the server was reset while the page was loading" I have to hit "try again and then it connects.

    I get the following message when trying to connect to firefox:
    "The connection to the server was reset while the page was loading." I have to click on "try again" and then it connects.

    Did you check your security software (firewall)?
    A possible cause is security software (firewall) that blocks or restricts Firefox without informing you about that, possibly after detecting changes (update) to the Firefox program.
    Remove all rules for Firefox from the permissions list in the firewall and let your firewall ask again for permission to get full unrestricted access to internet for Firefox.
    See [[Server not found]] and [[Firewalls]] and http://kb.mozillazine.org/Firewalls

  • 'the connection was interrupted'

    I very often get this:
    'The connection was interrupted
    Connection to the server was restored during the download page.
    The site may temporarily be down or busy. Please try again in a
    moment.
    If you can not open any page at all, check your computer
    network connection.
    If your computer or network protected by a firewall or proxy, make sure that Firefox is permitted to connect to the web.'
    And at the bottom there´s a button says, try again.
    Sometimes I've to try several times before the page is loaded. I haven't have had this problems before and it never come up in IE. I have broadband with 100Mb, maybe it's too fast? :-)

    A possible cause is security software (firewall) that blocks or restricts Firefox or the plugin-container process without informing you, possibly after detecting changes (update) to the Firefox program.
    Remove all rules for Firefox from the permissions list in the firewall and let your firewall ask again for permission to get full unrestricted access to internet for Firefox and the plugin-container process and the updater process.
    See:
    * https://support.mozilla.com/kb/Server+not+found
    * https://support.mozilla.com/kb/Firewalls
    Start Firefox in <u>[[Safe Mode]]</u> to check if one of the extensions is causing the problem (switch to the DEFAULT theme: Firefox (Tools) > Add-ons > Appearance/Themes).
    *Don't make any changes on the Safe mode start window.
    *https://support.mozilla.com/kb/Safe+Mode

  • Opening attachments gives the error : "The connection was reset. The connection to the server was reset

    Opening attachments gives the error : "The connection was reset. The connection to the server was reset. I tried clearing cookies and cache, but it doesnot work. 8 out of 10 times this is happenning. It's reproducible, and happening only after the latest update.

    A possible cause is security software (firewall,anti-virus) that blocks or restricts Firefox or the plugin-container process without informing you, possibly after detecting changes (update) to the Firefox program.
    Remove all rules for Firefox and the plugin-container from the permissions list in the firewall and let your firewall ask again for permission to get full unrestricted access to internet for Firefox and the plugin-container process and the updater process.
    See:
    *https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Server+not+found
    *https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Firewalls
    You can also try to reset (power off/on) the router.

  • How to resolve "the connection was reset"error?

    ''Question duplicated; please continue at [/questions/1056868]''
    i was trying to load www.facebook.com and this is the error i get
    The connection was reset
    The connection to the server was reset while the page was loading.
    The site could be temporarily unavailable or too busy. Try again in a few moments.
    If you are unable to load any pages, check your computer's network connection.
    If your computer or network is protected by a firewall or proxy, make sure that Firefox is permitted to access the Web.
    thanks

    Clear the cache and remove cookies only from websites that cause problems.
    "Clear the Cache":
    *Firefox/Tools > Options > Advanced > Network > Cached Web Content: "Clear Now"
    "Remove Cookies" from sites causing problems:
    *Firefox/Tools > Options > Privacy > "Use custom settings for history" > Cookies: "Show Cookies"
    Start Firefox in <u>[[Safe Mode|Safe Mode]]</u> to check if one of the extensions (Firefox/Tools > Add-ons > Extensions) or if hardware acceleration is causing the problem.
    *Switch to the DEFAULT theme: Firefox/Tools > Add-ons > Appearance
    *Do NOT click the Reset button on the Safe Mode start window
    *https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Safe+Mode
    *https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Troubleshooting+extensions+and+themes
    It is possible that your security software (firewall, anti-virus) blocks or restricts Firefox or the plugin-container process without informing you, possibly after detecting changes (update) to the Firefox program.
    Remove all rules for Firefox and the plugin-container from the permissions list in the firewall and let your firewall ask again for permission to get full, unrestricted, access to install for Firefox and the plugin-container process and the updater process.
    See:
    *https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Server+not+found
    *https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Firewalls
    *https://support.mozilla.org/kb/fix-problems-connecting-websites-after-updating

  • The connection was denied because the user account is not authorized for remote login

    Using Terminal Server 2008 not able to get non administrator users to login to the remote desktop. Have tried from Windows server 2008 and from Windows servers 2003. Get error login in "The connection was denied because the user account is not authorized for remote login" from Windows Server 2008. Error "The requested session access is denied" from Windows Server 2000.

    Is that seriously the only way to do this? Doesn't this render the "Allow log on through Terminal Services" GP Setting useless?
    I would like to know this answer, as well.  I have created a new AD group for my assistant admins called "Domain Admins (limited)".  I have added this group to the GP setting "Allow log on through Terminal Services", but the
    assistant admins cannot log in through RDP.  It 'feels like' this is all I would need to do.
    Craig
    Found some good info
    here. There are really two things required for a user to connect to a server via RDP. You can configure one of them via Group Policy but not the other.
    1) Allow log on through Terminal Services can be configured through Group Policy, no problem.
    2) Permissions on the RDP-listener must also be granted.  If your user is a member of the local Administrators group or the local Remote Desktop Users group then this is handled.  If you are trying to utilize a new, custom group (as I am),
    then there isn't a way to do this via group policy (that I have found).
    EDIT: Found the answer.  I am creating a blog post to outline the steps.  They aren't hard, but they're not self-explanatory.  It deals with the Restricted Groups mentioned above, but it's still automate-able using Group Policy so that you
    don't have to touch each computer.  I think the above poster (Andrey Ganev) got it right, but
    I had trouble deciphering his instructions.
    Here is my blog post that walks through this entire process, step-by-step.

  • AD "Log on to" restriction causes RDP connections with network level authentication to fail

    I am running a Server 2008 R2 environment and have recently enabled network level authentication for RDP connections. Since the change, users who have their logons restricted to specific servers via AD, now get an error when logging on via RDP:
    An Authentication error has occured
    The Local security authority cannot be contacted
    After investigating this error and reading technet I found that removing the "log on to" restriction within their user object solved the problem even tho they had rights to this server. Adding the users client PC name to the "Log on
    to" list also solves this issue.
    My question is, is there another way around this? We have an environment where some users may require an RDP connection from a client PC not on the same domain (over VPN) as the server. It will not be practical to add many different client PC names
    to the log on to list and I don't understand why client PC's must be specified in the Log on to list and not just the actual server they are logging onto.
    Any pointers appreciated

    I have just come across this problem on one of my client’s domains; they have recently enforced a policy to “Allow connections only from computers running Remote Desktop with Network Level Authentication (more secure)”  and users with “Log on To” restrictions
    on their account are no longer able to RDP using their second account.
    After a lot of fiddling around I finally resolved the problem by adding the connecting computer name into “Log on To” list.  Ultimately it appears that Network Level Authentication (NLA) requires authentication to take place on both the host initiating
    the connection and the remote host.

  • IPad Air - The connected device requires too much power.

    When connecting my iDJ Live II to my new iPad Air  I receive the following message:
    Cannot Use Device
    Numark iDJ Live II: The connected device requires too much power.
    The iPad Air is running iOS 7.0.4, I also have an iPhone 5S, iPad Mini and iPad 2 all running latest iOS 7.0.4 and this dj controller runs on all these models. I know about the 20mA output limit on these other devices but they all still work why not the iPad Air? What has changed?
    I am very disappointed with this restriction as the only reason I bought the iPad Air was for the better processing power and 128gb storage to fit all my music on there to use this dj controller with djay 2 and vjay. Now I have spent $900 on something I can not use as intended.
    Please any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks
    Adam

    Try giving your iPad a reset. See if it can clear up the error or if it repeats. Hold down the sleep and home keys until it reboots then try again.
    How does this device plug in? Via the lightning connector or the USB part of the camera kit? If it's USB then sometimes a powered USB hub can help with the power issues.
    If it's lightning then the issue could be related to something that came with iOS7. Due to so many unauthorized lightning cables, iOS7 activated software that looks for a code broadcast by the chip in the lightning connector. Authorized manufacturers have codes that the software sees, unauthorized ones don't. Usually people using unauthorized cables get a specific message, however it could be possible that this new part of the software is affecting other things connected to the lightning port.
    Have you looked on djay's site to see if others are having issues or if they have fixes?

  • How to Troubleshoot the Connection Pool Exception?

    Dear Oracle Gurus, very good afternoon to you.
    I'm looking forward for some tips/troubleshoting guide to escape from the below exception, that occres very frequently to one of application that 100+ users will login from different locations & work on and update the data and save their work, where all in sudden they can't acces the application and it gets down.
    Most of the times in the server log I observed below.
    weblogic.jdbc.extensions.PoolLimitSQLException: weblogic.common.resourcepool.ResourceLimitException: No resources currently available in pool RemoteDesktop.main to allocate to applications, please increase the size of the pool and retry..
    Please help me on, how to overcome this kind of exception.
    In Weblogi c server I see below kind of Warnings.
    If you set the buffer size to zero in a servlet, it would fail to respond and would initiate an infinite loop in the server. WebLogic Server would ultimately display a Errors:
    ExecuteThread: '157' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default' has been busy for "633" seconds working on the request "Http Request: : ../updates/process_manager.jsp", which is more than the configured time (StuckThreadMaxTime) of "600" seconds.
    I searched over google for this kind of error, See otherusers posted the same kind of errors but didn't have any positive replies to troubleshoot this issue.
    I also got Oracle Dev link on Weblogic version upgrade product where they fixed similar kind of error it seems. Which is shown below.
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E13222_01/wls/docs61/notes/bugfixes2.html -- BUG # CR106186
    details:
    "Suspend Checker Thread" prio=10 tid=0x23eb90 nid=0xfec runnable
    <May 14, 2003 10:53:34 AM PDT> <Warning> <WebLogicServer> <000337>
    <ExecuteThread: '10' for queue: 'default' has been busy for "1,181" seconds working on the request "Http Request: servlet_uri", which is more than the configured time (StuckThreadMaxTime) of "600" seconds.>
    This problem was solved with a code fix.
    Looking forward for some help, Thank you inadvance.
    FYI..
    I'm using oracle thin driver JDBC connection/Weblogic 8.1
    Edited by: user1072948 on Apr 26, 2012 11:55 AM

    I agree that looking into the number of connections that you have open when you see
    weblogic.jdbc.extensions.PoolLimitSQLException: weblogic.common.resourcepool.ResourceLimitException: No resources currently available in pool RemoteDesktop.main to allocate to applications, please increase the size of the pool and retry..
    would be a good idea; but I would suggest that you don't increase without thinking about the consequences. I would look more closely at what the connections to the database are doing, for instance, how long are the connection being left open for? What are the queries that are being run? Should you expect to see all the connections in the connection pool being used? What is the current connection pool limit? Are you simply going to increase the number of connections to find that they are also waiting? What is the load on the database at the time?
    It's the other error that you say you see
    ExecuteThread: '157' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default' has been busy for "633" seconds working on the request "Http Request: : ../updates/process_manager.jsp", which is more than the configured time (StuckThreadMaxTime) of "600" seconds.
    What does this JSP do? Why would this be busy for so long? Is it related to the previous exception that you have? I'd ask you delevelopment team to look into this.
    In short, it sounds like you have load issues on your server(s) and a careful tuning of the system after a full analysis (thread dumps, heap profiling, connection pool monitoring and code review) would probably be beneficial. It may be that restricting the thread pool may help, it may be that increasing the connection pool would help. I'd not plump for a quick fix here.

  • I have a new lion server and 4 lion laptops. The laptops loose connection to the shared documents and printers from the server after roughly 1 hour. By disconnecting and re-connecting wireless the connection is regained to shares and printers

    I have a new lion server and 4 lion laptops. The laptops loose connection to the shared documents and printers from the server after roughly 1 hour. By disconnecting and re-connecting wireless the connection is regained to shares and printers. We can still surf the web when it goes down.

    Ok 1st one. The warning restriction message relates to this line in main.cf:
    smtpd_helo_restrictions = permit_sasl_authenticated  permit_mynetworks  check_helo_access hash:/etc/postfix/helo_access  reject_non_fqdn_hostname  reject_invalid_hostname  permit reject_invalid_helo_hostname
    The last reject occurs after the single word "permit" and is ignored.
    However, that's not the problem.
    I'm not exactly sure what's happening, but this might be a clue.
    It would appear that either postfix is not being able to create the socket for private/policy or it's somehow created with the wrong permissions.  You might need to ramp up the debug level to get a better idea.
    You could check if it's being created by "netstat -a | grep private/policy" in terminal.
    My guess is that it's not being created because there is no setup statement in your master.cf file, but I don't understand why postfix would be looking for it if it isn't set up.  Private/policy I think relates to grey listing.  Maybe gives you a hint.

  • Failure-Io Exception:The network adapter could not establish the connection

    Hi,
    I am new to sql developer and need help regarding establishing connection in my PC.
    I gave the following details for establishing connection.
    Connection Name: DB
    Username: myDB
    passwd: xxxxx
    Role: Default
    Connection Type: Basic
    Host Name: localhost
    Port: 1521
    SID: xe
    When I tested the connection the following error occured:
    Failure -Io Exception: The network adapter could not establish the connection
    Please help me out.
    Thanks in advance.

    Some information showing:
    How to check if there is something listening on a machine/port (there are also port scanners like nmap)
    first a success: ctrl - ] typed in by me.
    $ telnet localhost 1521
    Trying 127.0.0.1...
    Connected to localhost.
    Escape character is '^]'.
    ^]
    telnet> quit
    Connection closed.
    then a fail:
    $ telnet localhost 1522
    Trying 127.0.0.1...
    telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused
    $
    Oracle also has tools to get the status of the 'listener' which is listening on the port, including database names for example 'lsnrctl stat' but it may have too many dependencies and privileges required to go into here.
    If you do not have XE, you can install it with very few restrictions.
    -Turloch

  • HT1980 Using the iphone S App for optimum.   Precisouly every 1/2 hr the connection to the App shuts off.  Why, I and they have no answer ???

    Using the iphone S App for optimum.   Precisouly every 1/2 hr the connection to the App shuts off. WHY ???
    Bud

    Thanks for that. Much more constructive than the last comment. It's only the restriction code I can't recall, not the access passcode. So I can currently access the device, just not age restricted content. Does that's make a difference? I also wondered if anyone knew how many attempts you get to try to get it right. Now tried 21 times and so far nothing bad has happened but I am concerned I'll eventually be completely locked out of the device. That doesn't seem in the spirit of things though. Surely it's foreseeable that a child could repeatedly try to guess the code so I can't see that it would be right to lock the device down completely in that circumstance, particularly if the access code is being typed in correctly every time.
    Thanks

  • "The Network Adapter could not establish the connection" on Debian

    On a new Debian server I was getting the following error when running my Java code:
    java.sql.SQLException: Io exception: The Network Adapter could not establish the connection
    Since none of the solutions listed on this forum worked for me, here is what fixed it:
    http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=560044
    Hope it will help others here!

    In 8.1.7, we had some restrictions on the selectors that could be used with QueueReceiver
    Only the following were supported:
    JMSMessageID = 'ID:23452345' to retrieve messages that have a specified message ID (all message IDs being prefixed with
    ID:)
    JMSCorrelationID = 'RUSH' or JMSCorrelationID LIKE 'RE%' to retrieve messages that have a certain correlationID
    The selector that the customer is using will work with TopicSubscribers. On topics users can use user-defined properties such as
    color='RED';
    The selectors are documented in Chapter 12- Application developer's guide - Advanced Queuing.
    In Oracle9i, the QueueReceiver has been enhanced to support all types of selectors including the user-defined properties
    For better response please post Advanced Queueing Questions in <b> Products > Database > Oracle Advanced Queueing <b> forum

Maybe you are looking for