Restriction to use mov type 309

Hi,
I need to restrict some of users not to use mov type 309 only, other mov type they need to use, in that case how to do ??
I knew the object (object name -authorization object is M_MSEG_BWA) pls tell me the steps?

Dear Jayakumar,
While creating the roles using T Code PFCG,after adding the T code MB1B under any role,ask your Basis consultant to look for
this authorization object M_MSEG_BWA,and dont include the check box for 309 movement and include it for the other
movement's like 311,312 etc.
So whatever role that's allowing MB1B should be checked so that it 's not having the authorization for 309 movement.
Check and revert back.
Regards
Mangalraj.S

Similar Messages

Material to Material Transfer using Movement Type 309

Hi,
We have activated the material ledger.
Issues:
When we transfer material A to Material B using Movement Type 309 the price difference from Material A was not allocated to Material B after executing CKMLCP.
But the another company who using the materail to material transfer, the price difference was allocated to receiving material.

Hi,
Please check SAP Note 167722 to able to do multi-level price determination for material transfer with using modification.
best regards, Takashi

Stock Transfer using movement type 309 of in-transit material

Hi Gurus,
We have a scenario where we want to post a 309 movement type on an intransit STO stock (sto is done from PWO, this is done to solve a SOX compliance problem). But it seems that this is not possible as the 309 can not be posted without a s. loc. Is there any alternative to this? Can a two step transfer using 313 and 315 do the trick? Please advise.
Thanks

In real life you cannot do anything to a material that is somewhere on the road, hence it is pretty limited what you can do in SAP.
What exactly do you want to do?

Issue with posting change note processing using movement type 309

while processing Posting change note using transaction LT05, i am getting error 'Available quantity is less than selected quantity'. we need the quantity in posting change note to be picked from same storage bin from where it has been picked during transfer posting using 309. currently, it is showing all storage bins in ascending order for selection while Posting change note posting.
if we reqwhile mass porcessing of Posting change note using LSMW, it pickes the 1st storage bin. if 1st storage bin quantity is less than selected quantity of PCN then it is showing above error.

Hi Vishal,
The materials are managed by batch? Please check the batches of the material in the different storage bins. SAP asign the storage bin taking into account the material batch number and the oldest quant.
When the storage bin is not indicated, SAP looks at the batch number, and goes to the storage bin where this batch for the material is allocated. If SAP find more than one storage bin, SAP consumes from the batch that has the oldest quant.
I really dont understand deeply your question.
Hope it helps.
Regards
Enzo

Limiting users to select articles from movement type 309- SAP retail

Hi experts,
My client wants to restriction on limiting users selecting articles from movement type 309 in SAP retail. They need an option to predefine article list which can allows users to transfer articles using movement type 309. Is any standard way to accomplish this requirement or whether it s need ABAP development.
Thank You & Best Regards
Sameera

this BAPI just creates movements, you access your Z-tables from the ABAP that calls this BAPI, isn't it?
But in the exit EXIT_SAPMM07M_001 you can program to read the Z-tables and do the necessary steps to restrict the usage, hence you can use the standard transactions for the movements without needing an extra program that calls a BAPI.

Change the behavior for movement type 309 - Account post PRD

Dear friends ,
We need to transfer material to material using movement type 309.
These material are using price control "S".
When we transfer from material A to material B the price difference stay stopped in the PRD account.
We need to revaluate the material B automatically and not let the price difference stopped in the PRD... when we run the Material Costs..via Material ledger.
Does anyone knows a way to change this behavior ?
best regards,
Alessandro

Dear Revi thanks for your answer !
One more thing...
We cannot change the valuation from S to V in the material B.
Regarding the PRD postings... when the Controlling team runs the Material Ledger the price for material B should be changed/updated automatically, Am I right ?
And then the PRD account must be cleared...
Or I continue to do the MR22 manuall...or better... create an Abap program to run automatically clearing the PRD posting agains't the material via MR22 to correct the cost of this material.
thanks once more.
Ale

Transfer posting mov type 309

Dear friends,
Please help me in following scenario,
In MIGO, I want to do transfer posting from one material to another .using mov. type 309.
My problem is that, my destination material batch number is comming same as sender material batch number. I want system to automatically create new internal batch number for destination material.
Please guide.
Regards,
Amit Shirsath

Dear Madam,
I have done the same using MB11, but i am not able to do the same with MIGO, and my clients requirement is to do with MIGO only..
Regards,
Amit Shirsath

Posting with MM Movement Type 309 material to material: Error in WM

Hello,
i post an MM-Movement type (Bewegungsart) 309 (material to material).
The MM-goods movement works, but then in warehouse mangagement there is a problem:
The creation of the transfer order (Transportauftrag) stops in many cases.
The aim is to post Material A to the same storage bin in Warehouse Management where Material B was before.
I programmed this in user-exit (ZXLToU03) that by movement type 309, always taking same storage bin. But then I often get the error: transfer order could not be created. Then I have to do the creation of tranfer order in foreground and then I get an error like this:
capacity of the bin location is not enough.
The Problem is that I do a posting for example:
001 010101 to 922 Umbuchungzone --> Transfer order Pos 1
922 Umbuchungszone to 001 010101 --> Transfer order Pos 2.
And so the first transfer order position is not confirmed when I do the transfer order Pos 2.
How can I confirm Pos 1 by batch-input? The Programm to do 309 should posting 1000 materials in one step. But in Warehouse management I get those problems?
Is it possible to increase the capacitiy of the storage bin and then decrease it after creation of transfer order(where can I do this and when)???
I hope anybody can help me.
Thanks.

Hello Kevin,
I donu2019t think it is necessary to use a user exit to keep the Material B (that is transferred from Material A) in the same bin.
This can be controlled in the customizing: indicator Post to same bin, that can be set in the WM Movement type (V_T333-KZUAP) and in the Storage type (V_T3010-KZUAP).
Now I donu2019t know your business process but I am surprised that Material B requires more space than Material A since it is u2018bornu2019 by means of a transfer posting and not a production or packing step that makes it bigger in terms of capacity required.
A workaround for this could be to transfer (LT10) Material A first to a separate Storage type (with the Post to same bin-flag set) that has no Capacity check and after the 309 posting transfer it back into the warehouse with LT10.
Success and thanks beforehand for any credits!
Kind regards,
Bart

GL account for movement type 309

How to find GL account for movement type 309. Tcode etc
Stop Cross-Posting

Hi,
Try using transaction code OMWB (press cancel on pop-up) >
Press "Simulation" button and enter plant + mat + movement type >
Press "Account assignments" button
Dr/Cr G/L accounts displayed for posting lines.
Kind regards,
Robert

GL A/C for movement type 309

How to find GL account (tcode..) for movement type 309

The way to check the G/L accounts getting hit is to check the material document's FI document. To look for this document, use TCode MB51 with search selection as movement type 309 and execute, it will bring up all material documents created with this movement, double click on any material document No. will take you to display material document, there in header under DOC INFO tab, you will see FI document button click on that, and you can see the G/Ls and the accounting entry getting generated for the said movement.
Sometimes you will not see any FI document generated for movement 309. The reason is when doing variant adjustment of same price, no accounting document is generated as the prices are same. If the prices are different accounting document is generated.
Edited by: Afshad Irani on Apr 14, 2010 5:16 PM

Problem on mb1b with Movement type 309

when I use the t-code mb1b to transfer posting with Movement type 309,the system give a hint 'Account 40000000 requires an assignment to a CO object'. I checked the configuration of omwb and obyc.It seems no problem.
So can anyone tell me how to solve the problem? Thanks!

Hi
Alternative to the above solution will tell u which should work,it seems from the error that you need to put the Cost Center or G/L account. But if you don't want
the system to ask you everytime you do the goods transfer, you have to setup
your Cost Element / CO object. Go to transaction KA02 and put the
appropriate CO or Cost Element (when the system gave you the warning,
normally it gives you the CO object that need account assignment) and
assign the Default Acc.Assigment to the CO/Cost Element.
But before you do that, I suggest you to contact your FICO people.
Good luck
Regards,
Susi

Costing implications with movement type 309

Hi all,
Is there any costing implications with movement type 309-material to material transfer within the plant.
Thanks in advance.

Jyotishman,
The cost complication exists if there is price difference between the original material and the converted material. This is a highly risky movement type
Example:
Material A costs $100 - Quantity : 10 - Inventory cost = $1000
Material B costs $1000 - Quantity: 10 - Inventory cost = $10000
Total Inventory cost: $11000
If material A 10 qty is converted to Material B then,
Material B costs $1000 - Quantity: 20 - Inventory cost = $20000
Total Inventory cost: $20000($9000 increase in value)
If material B 10 qty is converted to Material A then,
Material A costs $100 - Quantity: 20 - Inventory cost = $2000
Total Inventory cost: $2000($9000 reduction value)
In Indian scenario - This movement type will be monitored by the audit team so generally access to this movement type is highly restricted.
Regards,
Prasobh

Error in Standard SAP movement type 309?

Path: SPRO > Logistic execution > Warehouse Management > Interfaces > Inventory Management > Define
Movement type > Assign WM Movement Type References to IM Movement Types
IM Movement type 309 has as Reference Movement types WM 301, 302 and 309.
IM Movement type 311 has as Reference Movement types WM 311, 312 and 309.
Path: SPRO > Logistic execution > Warehouse Management > Interfaces > Inventory Management > Define
Movement type > LE-WM Interface to Inventory Management
Reference Movement type 301 has WM Movement type 301.
Reference Movement type 302 has WM Movement type 302.
Reference Movement type 309 has WM Movement type 309.
Reference Movement type 311 has WM Movement type 311.
Reference Movement type 312 have WM Movement type 312.
Path: SPRO > Logistic execution > Warehouse Management > Activities > Transfers > Define Movement
types
WM Movement type 301 has Destination Storage type 920.
WM Movement type 302 has Source Storage type 920.
WM Movement type 309 has Source and Destination Storage type 922.
WM Movement type 311 has Destination Storage type 9210.
WM Movement type 312 has Source Storage type 921.
In my opinion this means that if I make an IM movement with movement 309 the material will be picked from a Storage
bin and moved to Storage type 920. After the change the material will be brought back from Storage type 920 to the same Storage bin.
The change will be done with WM Movement type 309 in Storage type 922.
This creates negative stock in both Storage type 920 and 922.
In my opinion this means that if I make an IM movement with movement 311 the material will be picked from a Storage
bin and moved to Storage type 921. After the change the material will be brought back from Storage type 921 to the same Storage bin.
The change will be done with WM Movement type 309 in Storage type 922.
This creates negative stock in both Storage type 920 and 922.
Is this an error in SAP standard? Should I Change the Source and Destination Storage types of Movement types 301,302,311 and 312 to 922?

Hi,
Please check wheather the material type of the material belongs to NLAG/UNBW or any other type which will not have qty/value updations for that plant at Attributes of the material type at SPROlOGISTICS GeneralMaterial mastermaterila types
Or take the question mark which is there on the error screen so that the information will become self explanatory.
Please reply back with your info.

Can we use Movement Type other than 653

Hi all
we are using movement type 653 for material which are being returned by customer.
we dont want to create FD ( Free of Chagre) Sales order against the returned delivery.
Problem
The Return Delivery is being showed in VLO6 transaction,(outbound delivery),we dont want the return delivery to get displayed in this transaction.Is their any other transaction we can use inplace of 653,in order to get material in unrestricted stock as well as the delivery should not be get displayed in the transaction.
I have created the new return delivery type (By copying LR) and at the time of runing the T-code VLO6,I exclude that delivery.
In this way the delivery is not being shown.
If there is any other way to slove this issue please let me know.
Thanks
Siddharth

The "Return Delivery" is being showed in VLO6
transaction, "(outbound delivery)"
Not sure on this. When you say you created a return delivery, how it is appearing in outbound delivery list. For information, standard movement types in SD for returns are 651, 653 & 655 and transfer the blocked stock to unrestricted use with movement types like 453, if you wish to do so.
But strictly speaking, all returns will have to be addressed in QM and only after their clearance, any returned material should be reused.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Stock Transfer for Excisable Materials Using Movement Type 301

Hi,
We are having a Plant 1002 as excisable Materials.
During GR we following the process like GR (Part -I), Capture Invoice, Post Invoice.
Can we transfer the Material from Plant 1002 to other Plant, say 1001, using Movement Type 301?
Or we need to follow some other router for Stock Transfer for the Excisable Materials?
I was told by the ex-consultant that we would be using Mov Type 301 for all Stock Transfers, but I have a doubt, please guide.*
Regards,

Hi PK,
Here in Brazil we work with excisable material and when we have to transfer it plant to plant, we have to use IVA that performs tax posts on accounting document. Also, we have to create Nota Fiscal (BrazillianLegal Document).
I think you have to talk to your legal/accounting area in order to make sure which procedure you will have to use.
If you need tax posting on accounting document, then you will not be able to use 301 movement type.
We use MM/SD Plant to Plant transfer (movement type 861 / 862)
Depending on your Legal/accounting area feed back, you could use this scenario or just MM plant to plant transfer (movement type 303/305).
If they are ok with no tax postings on accounting document, then 301 movement type should be used.
Try to make a test, show then how it works, then you could get ok from then
I hope it helps you.
Best Regards,
Natan

Restriction to use mov type 309

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for