Restrictions belonging relation between Change Request and Corrections?

Hi all,
In standard change process I only can create one change document (correction) to one change request.
Releation 1:1.
Is there a technical restriction belonging the relation between the change request and the corrections?
Does anyone has experience with a 1:n relation in the change process?
Thanks for your help in advance.
Regards,
Alex
Edited by: Alexander Barth on Mar 16, 2009 11:24 AM

Hi Prakhar,
what you described is a process-restriction. It is not a technical restriction.
E.g.: I have a change belonging BI. Therefore I have to change things in BI and ERP 6.0. Why not using one change request with two corrections? One for BI and one for ERP 6.0.
So you are right if you want to create for that situation two change requests. There is no relation between them. How do you control them?
Administration and documentation is important. But it should be useful.
And I am able to set up more than one corrections to one change request technicaly in SolMan.
But is there a deeper technical restriction inside which raise problems later?
For me it seems that SAP wants that a 1:1 relation is used. But why?
Does anyone have an idea?
Thanks.
Regards,
Alex

Similar Messages

Changing of iBase in Change Requests and Corrections being processed

Good day!
After going SP18 with Solution Manager our iBase component system has gone "mad": number for productive ERP-system has changed several times.
Because of this change, a number of already approved change requests and corrections in processing can't be modified correctly. I can't change their status by regular operations from system document. Multiple correction/ change request change also won't work. And I can't change the iBase component in this documents, because the field is read only.
How can I close all Change Requests and corrections with old iBase component number?
Is there a way to change the iBase number in already approved Change Requests and Corrections, so i can perform operations with this system documents.

Hello Raguraman!
Thank you for your answer.
Anyway I implemented the note to which you refer, and still can't change iBase component in corrections and change requests which are in process. The "iBase/Component" field is still read only and contains components which do not exist anymore.
Do you know how can I change this values?

Ifference between change request and release request and transport request

what is the difference between change request and release request and transport request and customization request?

Please refer to this link :
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/57/38e1824eb711d182bf0000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Regards,
Praveen
Pl reward if helpful

Difference between Change request and Service request

HI All,
Can any body tell me the actual difference between Change request and Service Request. Does it have any difference ? Or they are same.

Are you referring to the project Specific Terms ??? If yes, then following are the differences.
Change Request - Suppose user is using a Sales Report which displays Revenue by Customer. Now the user wants to see the same by Product as well which is not available in the current report. So the user raises a Change request and the development team works on it to include the same and make it avaialable for the user.
Service Request - These kind of requests are more likely raised when the user needs access to some system (raise service request to Security team), wants to move a transport to the Production box (raise Service request to Basis Team)..etc.

Difference between task request and change request

What is the difference between task request and change request during sap implementation. In general how many tasks will generate during a normal company inmplementation by any functional consultant?

Hi,
Change request and task request are same.But generally change request is generated during newly created objects or reports that are transported and task request is used when u regenerate the change request by modifying that object again and transporting it in new change request.
A particular change request may contain multiple number of task request but that number depends upon number of objects u transfer during generation and transportation.
Pls do reward points if ans is useful.
Regards,
Suhas.

Report for Support Message, Change Request and Change in one overview?

Is there a report that shows the relation between the support message, change request and the change in one overview? I am already aware of the Change Management Reporting via SOLAR_EVAL, but this does not show the whole document flow in one overview.
The incident message processors want to have a quick overview of the status of the changes that are created on the basis of the support message.
If there is no report, could you point me in the right direction... Do I have to create a query or are you using BW for service desk/charm reporting?

Hi
chk te sap note
[Note 1466131 - ChaRM Reporting: Performance of data update|https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=1466131]
jansi

Personnel Change Request And HCMPF.

Hi All,
Please kindly provide me the difference between Personnel Change Request and HCMPF,
Technically, i heard PCR works on java script window and HCMPF on Adobe forms with Webdynpro Environment. (correct me if i'm wrong).
Please update me with other differences, advantages and Disadvantages of the both.
Currently our system is in ECC 5.0, analyzing on implementing PCR or HCMPF.
So, kindly advise me on the difference between these two with its pros and cons.
Thanks a lot for your help..
Regards,
Nathan.

Hi,
PCR (Pers Chnage Request) is also available in interactive Adobe UI from ECC 5.0, however from ECC 6.0 SAP introduced HCMPF that has more flexibility and can handle more complex sceanrios. SAP recommends (documention exist both in IMG and online help) customers to use HCMPF going forward.
There is some good documentation available on SAP service market place if you have access.
Few of the advantages HCMPF are :
Capability to handle attachments
Allows "Save as draft"
Updates EE's master data in the background mode
Employee also can be included in the process
Search iView provides ability for HR to track the status on form
BI content is available to support reporting
Now in EhP4 HCMPF supports processes in PD (Positions, Org units, Jobs etc)
Hope this helps
regards
Sridhar Kandisetty

Difference between customizing request and workbench request?

Hi ,
What is the difference between customizing request and workbench request?
please reply.........

HI,
Workbench Requests
When you change a Repository object of the ABAP Workbench, a query window appears in which you need to specify a Workbench request. You can only save the changes if you have assigned the object to a change request.
Workbench requests and the tasks assigned to them are normally used to record changes to Repository objects and Customizing for all clients. However, you can also include client-specific Customizing.
Whether the changes to Repository objects are transported depends on whether a transport route is defined from the current SAP System for the package of these objects. From the system settings, the system automatically determines whether the change requests are transportable and to which target system they should be transported.
Customizing requests
Customizing requests record client-specific Customizing settings made in a single client (the source client of the request).
Automatic recording of configuration activities in the Customizing work for a client can be activated or deactivated for each client with Client Control. If automatic recording is active, a query window appears when you change Customizing settings, asking you to specify a Customizing request.
Whether Customizing requests are transported or not, does not depend on the objects entered, as is the case with Workbench change requests. The Customizing requests in an SAP System (or in a client if you use Extended Transport Control) are either all transportable or all local, depending on the system setting. The system uses the standard transport layer to determine automatically whether the change requests are transportable and to which target system they should be transported. However, you can change this manually.
pl reward if it helps.
Thanks
Sadhu Kishore

Relation between GL Account and Invoice?

Hi Experts,
I am working with the FI reports for the first time and I do not have any idea on FI functional flow. I have some basic questions like
What is the Relation between GL Account and Invoice?
When will an Invoice be posted into BKPF, BSEG, BSAD, BSID, BSAK and BSIK? Is there any field in these tables which gives the Invoice number against which a GL Account is created?
For example if I want to calculate " no of vendor invoices without PO how can I do that"? How can I know what are vendor invoices created against a PO or without PO?
Thanks for any help in advance and I am bound to reward points.
Sri

What is the Relation between GL Account and Invoice?
SAP's Glossary for GL Account is
"A structure that records value movements in a company code and represents the G/L account items in a chart of accounts.
A G/L account has transaction figures that record changes to the account during a posting period. These figures are totals that are used for G/L reporting."
In accountancy, an account is a label used for recording and reporting a quantity of almost anything. For example when a company pays salary to its staff, They debit Salary account. This is to identify what is the nature of an expense.
An invoice is a message to the buyer of goods or services that contains, among other things, Name of the goods or services, Quantity sent, & Remuneration due.
Invoice is also a SD document used to charge a customer for a delivery of goods or for services rendered.
When will an Invoice be posted into BKPF, BSEG, BSAD, BSID, BSAK and BSIK? Is there any field in these tables which gives the Invoice number against which a GL Account is created?
If it were a vendor invoice. (i.e you purchase items or service and recieve invoice)
Invoice get posted to the tables once someone makes a Logistics Invoice verification through t-code MIRO etc. The teble RBKP gets the first posting.
If it were your own invoice to your customers, then VBAK and VBAP get the posting. The connectivity of tables are available in http://www.erpgenie.com/abap/tables.htm As far as SAP is concerned an invoice is a document, so you can only trace invoice as a document number, field name is usually BELNR. Even if a vendor invoice arrive, an internal invoice number is generated where the vendor invoice is entered only as a reference field. This is because, each vendor can have inovices of different size and pattern.
How can I know what are vendor invoices created against a PO or without PO?
For a purchase order you can find in table EKBE for BEWTP = Q any invoice document.

Difference between workbench request and customizing request in transport

Hi Experts,
I am new to SAP BI7 work. i am having basic doubt in Transort request creations
ususally we create the requests to transport the objects from Development system to further systems.
can anyone please clarify me, what is the main defference between the Workbench request and Customizing request.
Thanks and Regards
Mrudula

Hi ,
The Transport Organiser maintains Change Requests.These requests record the changes made to the repository and customizing objects.Based on that objects changed they are
1)WorkBench Request & 2) Customizing Request.
Workbench Requests are those that involve changes to cross-client Customising and Repository Objects. The objects are independent of the client.Hence the requests are used for transferring and transporting changed Repository objects and changed system settings from cross-client tables.
Customizing Requests involve changes recorded to client-specific Customizing objects .These client specific requests are used for copying and transporting changed system settings from client-specific tables.
Refer this links http://www.allinterview.com/showanswers/57910.html
customising and workbench request
Difference between Customizing request and Workbench request
and many more threads available on this.
Regards,
Rahul.

Relation between Ibots,Delivers and BI Publisher

Hi,
I would like to know the relation between Ibots,Delivers and BI Publisher.
Any one help Please.
Thanks,
Lakshmipathi.

Tim,
Please in Contracts forums look for "Need to change OKCTERMSDS Data Source "
The third reply says
"The XML for the documents are generated by the product code using BC4J XML generation. No concurrent program is involved in it.
As regards to including additional fields from Sourcing documents into the XML generated, you can use the BC4J extension fwk to extend the ViewObject that generates XML and modify the query to include any additional fields as needed.
All the above assumes knowledge of Oracle Application Framework and the customization fwk. There is a Metalink Note (dont know the exact id) which explains how to extend BC4J objects and deploy them.
Thanks.
Juanje

Relation between business process and functional area during the role search

Hi Experts,
We have 2 functional areas in which we have different business process involved.
During the Access request, if the user selects one functional area then business process related to that functional area should come.
Is there any functionality in GRC, where the mapping between functional are and business process to be done?
Thanks,
Sriram

Hi Sri,
there is relationship between 'Business process' and 'Sub-business' process as in configuration parameter you can setup that once business process is selected only relevant sub-process will be selected.
There is no such a relation between functional area and business process.
Filip

Relation between RFC time and Roll wait time

Hello
What is the relation between RFC time and Roll wait time?
In a diagram from E2E100 training I took recently the relationship is made out to be:
RFC+CPIC = some processing time + Roll wait time
Something like this
Processing----
Roll wait-------
Roll in
RFC+CPIC----
In the diagram I saw it shows that roll out occurs during processing.
Assumming that the user context rolls out and then rolls in again, wouldn't "Wait" time occur when the request comes back and the dispatcher has to assign the request to a work process?
Is this wait time calculated as "Wait" time or is it calculated as "Roll wait" time?
I was forced to think about this because of a STAD record I have with high Roll wait time, but with low RFC time as well as zero GUI time. If "Wait" time when the request comes back from RFC is included in "Roll wait" then it might explain what i'm seeing.
Kind regards,
Peter

Hello Santosh,
Thank you for your reply.
I would like to know how time spend in the dispatcher by a request coming back from an RFC is calculated.
When the RFC is made the user context is rolled out of the work process so the work process becomes free. When the RFC comes back it has to be assigned to a new work process. This means that a bit of time would need to be spent in the dispatcher. Would this time be measured as "wait" time or is it part of "Roll wait time?
From the definition you gave of "Roll wait time", "it is the time dedicated by the R/3 system to waiting for the return value of an RFC call plus the CPIC time required to create the connection for that RFC to an outside system", one would think that the time spent in the dispatcher by a returning RFC would be measured as "wait time" the same as when the dialog request first comes in from the front end. I've never seen a diagram that explained this satisfactorily.
Kind regards,
Peter

Relation between Integrated Planning and BPS

Dear all,
I am just considering about using the BI Integrated Planning. I have a few question about the relation between BW-BPS and BI Integrated Plannning.Can anybody tell me about the near future about these both two? Is the BI Integrated Planning going to replace the BW-BPS or are they going to co-exist instead? Do we have to use them both? Although I'm not used to the new features of BI Integrated Planning, I just quite don't get what is the advantage of using them besides ensuring the future development.
Best regards,
Takashi

Hi Matsumoto,
I have recently implemented both BW-BPS and IP on 2004S.
I have always started with trying to implement IP instead of BW-BPS because, as we all agree, it is the future. Another reason was personal: I wanted to learn IP.
Sometimes I however had to switch to BW-BPS because of following reasons:
- the front-ends are more advanced if the users have a SAPGUI installed. The Excel front-end of IP is more advanced compared to the Excel GUI version of BW-BPS. IP is based on workbooks (the same as BW workbooks). Workbooks have more flexibility than BW-BPS Excel GUI version. The problem is that you need the 2004S gui to use IP via workbooks. Installations of the 2004S gui is rather complex and is almost impossible to install remotely because there are so many components involved.
- the front-ends on the web do not require a SAPGUI and are more advanced in BW-BPS. In BW-BPS, you can use the office web components (Excel on the web) where you can copy past, etc. The IP web version is HTML based and does not yet support the office web component. You can use it for data entry of a limited number of data but is hard to use for large volumes.
- BW-BPS for now supports more hierarchy features than IP. Displaying hierarchies can be done on IP. If you want to do bottom-up or top-down planning, it is adviseable to develop on BW-BPS; Again, these features will in the future be supported by IP but are not yet.
- performance: saving is quite slow in IP compared to BW-BPS.
- timing: if you want to move fast, go for BW-BPS. There is a lot more documentation on forums, you will have a lot less problems etc.
By the way, Sean is 100% correct about the instability of IP. We had to implement a number of notes and had SAP to create new notes for problems we had.
Please assign points if this solved your problem.
Best Regards,
Filip

What is the difference between workbench request and customizing request

hi gurus
can anyone suggest me
what is the difference between
workbench request and
customizing request
abaper ll work on which request
thank you
regards
kals.

A quick search in the forum would have taken you to this answer
Workbench Requests
When you change a Repository object of the ABAP Workbench, a query window appears in which you need to specify a Workbench request. You can only save the changes if you have assigned the object to a change request.
Workbench requests and the tasks assigned to them are normally used to record changes to Repository objects and Customizing for all clients. However, you can also include client-specific Customizing.
Whether the changes to Repository objects are transported depends on whether a transport route is defined from the current SAP System for the package of these objects. From the system settings, the system automatically determines whether the change requests are transportable and to which target system they should be transported.
Customizing requests
Customizing requests record client-specific Customizing settings made in a single client (the source client of the request).
Automatic recording of configuration activities in the Customizing work for a client can be activated or deactivated for each client with Client Control. If automatic recording is active, a query window appears when you change Customizing settings, asking you to specify a Customizing request.
Whether Customizing requests are transported or not, does not depend on the objects entered, as is the case with Workbench change requests. The Customizing requests in an SAP System (or in a client if you use Extended Transport Control) are either all transportable or all local, depending on the system setting. The system uses the standard transport layer to determine automatically whether the change requests are transportable and to which target system they should be transported. However, you can change this manually.

Restrictions belonging relation between Change Request and Corrections?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for