Result analysis for sub-items on SD-order

Hello,
I would like to know, whether also the document flow for subitems is being checked while executing result analysis.
Example:
We have got an SD order, a higher-level item and a sub-item.
Both of them have assigned the same result analysis key. Within this key it is defined in customizing (OKG3), that the Sales Order Structure is A-"Summarize Plan and Actual Data of Subitems on Highest Item"....so the result analysis for the sub-item is being performg via the higher-level item.
The higher-level positions is already completed - the delivery is made and also the invoice is created.
The sub-item is not completed - neighter delivery is made nor the invoice.
While executing the result analysis for the higher-level item, the status FNBL (final billing) is recognized and all cost are settled from WIP to CO-PA.
As far as I know, the document flow should be checked withitn the result analysis and based on this the status should be recognized.
Therefore It seems, that only the document flow from the higher-level item is being checked. If also the document flow from the sub-item is checked, there would be no way to get the status FNBL as the sub-item is not complete.
Is it SAP standard delivered behaviour?
Thanks in advance
Peter

Thanks Waman,
I have tried to delete the result analysis key from the sub-item, but still the same result in result analysis...
Could you tell my the consequences from the 1A setup from the note? It is adviced withitn the note to not use the 1A setup. But we use this and it works fine. Just some messages during the result analysis, that it could not be performed for sub-items, but this has no influence on the values.
Regards
Peter
Edited by: Peter Jankech on Jun 9, 2010 8:57 AM

Similar Messages

Disabling the Qty field for Input for Sub items in Sales Order and Delivery

Hi..
I have a requirement, where by we need to disable the qty field vbap-kwmeng for input for sub items of the BOM.
I am planning to use the user exit USEREXIT_FIELD_MODIFICATION...in the include MV45AFZZ for sales orders.
But i need to disable the input only after the BOM Explosion and item category determination in the sales order.
Can i Use the same exit ?? what additional conditions i need to take into account.
also we need to disable the delivery quantity field also for the sub items of this sales bom.
I see that this User exit is not available in delivery procesing. How to acheive the required functionality in the delivery processing...
your advice is much appreciated in this matter.
Regards
Srini

hi,
Route is determined
1.Country of Departure & Departure Zone taken from Shipping Point
2.Country of Destination & receiving Zone from Ship to party
3.Shipping condition from CMR
4.Transportation Group from MMR
5.Weight Group which is optional.
Check the above.
Route is determined in delivery.
ASHA

How to execute Result analysis for a Single order?

HI,
I need to execute Result analysis for a single process order. But i found cumulative RA. Can any one provide the Individual Result analysis execution T.code?
Thanks
KB

Hi,
Use "KKAX"-->individual WIP calculation
"KKAO"-->Collect WIP calculation
Thanks,
Rau

Results analysis for sales orders- actual costs/ revenues - (kka3-kkak)

Hi, i have a problem when I execute the individual results analysis for sales orders (kka3) I can see actual revenues and actual costs, however when I execute the collective processing (kkak) for the results analysis I don´t see these (actual revenues and costs). Is it normal? How can I see these in the collective processing?

Could be one of these possibilities:
1) Controlling Area set is wrong
2) You're input parameters are insufficient to get that sales order. Check Order Type etc you input in the main screen
3) The master data is wrong which is not allowing the link to the Sales Order. You would have to check each field thoroughly.
You will have to probably do a lot of checks before you resolve this. This isn't normal btw....you should see all Sales Orders
Assign Points if useful....

Results Analysis for Sales Orders

Hi
When i am calculting Results Analysis for Sales Orders as a part of Month End Closing Activities there are some errors for few orders...
Msg Type: E
AppAr: KJ
MsgNo: 216
Message Text: Planned Cost for Valuation are 0. Please Check the Object.
Can any one tell me what might be the error..
Thanks in Advance..
Sivaram

Hi,
The error is offen caused by one or possible more than one of following statements:
- the delivery block of the order is set
- the billing block is set
- the schedule line ( confirmed quantity ) is missing
- the position has been cancelled
- price condition is missing
In case no one of the mentioned options wouldn''t help, set the position status to technically completed, if the position is processed as well ( delivery, invoice, etc. ).
We often face this kind of issue
Good luck
Marian

Result Analysis for Refurbishment order

Hi Experts,
Could you please explain, can we calculate result analysis for refurbishment orders, I have created the RA key wip cost element ,selected internal and service orders w/o revenue in OKG9 and other WIP setting, I have assigned this TA key to order type in OIOF, I have created one refurb order, released and confirmed the order, now I have to do month end activity like RA calculation in KKA1 and than settlement.
When i am trying to execute KKA1 I am getting this message " Results analysis data was not changed
Message no. KJ240"
Could you please advise me how I need to fix this issue.
Appreciate if you can explain the month end process for refurbishment order in detail.
Regards,

Hi,
The default settlement rule for refurbishment ordrers is FUL rule to material. This type of rules defines the business scenario where the actual costs are settled only after the order is delivered or technically completed. In such cases the most used solution to monitor costs incurred on the order is to assign a results analysis key to the order and compute the so-called work in process (WIP). WIP (if computed) is equal to the actual costs on the order and it is posted to a WIP account when settling the order before DLV or TECO. When the order is delivered or technically completed, WIP calculation reverse WIP in CO
and the consequent settlement post this WIP cancellation to FI. Simulateously, the actual balance of the order is settled to material.
Check your customizing in OKG9 for the RA version ; have you set flag 'transfer to FI' ?
regards
Waman

Results analysis data is calculated through sales order

Hi All,
I m trying to calculate WIP of one process Order through KKAX. But I am getting the below error
Results analysis data is calculated through sales order 300002423 001000
Message no. KJ112
Diagnosis
The order you selected for WIP calculation or results analysis is assigned to a sales order. A results analysis key was entered for this sales order.
System Response
The system determines results analysis data for orders assigned to sales order items through the results analysis for the sales order.
Procedure
Carry out results analyis on sales order 300002423 001000.
This process Order is related to Sales Order and I have checked the Result Analysis key is attached to Sales Order.
Please help me out in this issue.
Thanks!
Regards,
Vivek

Hi,
I was getting the above error because a RA key was selected ar Sales Order, Now what I have done is I have removed the RA Key from Sales Order, there is already a RA key attached to Process Order. Now When i am calculating KKAX (WIP) I am getting below message
The order is not a WIP element
Message no. KJ148
I have done this because my client is not using KKA3(RA fro Sales Order)
Please help!!!!!!!!!
Thanks!
Regards,
Vivek Srivastava

Copy down Ship-to Partner from main item to sub-items on Sales Order

This is my first post on the forums here. I'd appreciate any help you can give on my issue below.
I have a requirement to copy down the ship-to partner from the main item to sub-items during sales order create or change. Currently I have code in include MV45AFZB within user exit USEREXIT_FILL_VBAP_FROM_HVBAP as follows:
<i>* Need to be able to copy the ship-to of a BoM parent down to the
respective BoM children if the parent has a different ship-to
from the header.
data: wa_xvbpa like vbpa.
Clear: wa_xvbpa.
read table xvbpa into wa_xvbpa with key posnr = hvbap-posnr
                                        parvw = 'WE'.
A BoM parent line has a different ship-to from the header.
    if sy-subrc = 0.
      read table xvbap with key uepos = hvbap-posnr.
See if current line is the child of that BoM parent
        If xvbap-uepos = hvbap-posnr.
          move wa_xvbpa-kunnr to xvbpa-kunnr.
          move xvbap-vbeln to wa_xvbpa-vbeln.
          move xvbap-posnr to wa_xvbpa-posnr.
          move 'WE' to wa_xvbpa-parvw.
          modify vbpa from wa_xvbpa.
        endif.
      Endif.</i>
This isn't working for me. At one point, I was able to copy the ship-to down to the first sub-item but not any subsequent ones. I'm sure I need to add some code to another sales order user exit to get this to work, but I'm at a loss at this point.   Has anyone had to do this or something similar before?
Thanks very much in advance for your help.
Angela

Hi,
Can you check few more things and tell me?
- In this exit, does XVBPA and XVBAP contains all the line items. ( main and sub items ).
- In Sales order creation time, do these table have VBELN populated when this exit triggers.
- If you modify XVBPA or XVBAP in this exit, do they get overwritten after that.
Try this code. See if it works. Let me know if you still have a problem.
DATA: wa_hvbpa LIKE vbpa,
      wa_xvbpa like vbpa.
CLEAR: wa_hvbpa, wa_xvbpa.
* check if HVBAP and VBAP line items are not same
IF vbap-posnr <> hvbap-posnr.
* read the ****-to partner from main-item
READ TABLE xvbpa INTO wa_hvbpa WITH KEY posnr = hvbap-posnr
                                          parvw = 'WE'.
IF sy-subrc = 0.
*   read the line item data for sub-item based on main item
    READ TABLE xvbap WITH KEY posnr = vbap-posnr
                              uepos = hvbap-posnr.
* See if current line is the child of that BoM parent
    IF sy-subrc = 0.
      MOVE wa_xvbpa-kunnr TO xvbpa-kunnr.
      MOVE xvbap-vbeln TO wa_xvbpa-vbeln.
      MOVE xvbap-posnr TO wa_xvbpa-posnr.
      MOVE 'WE' TO wa_xvbpa-parvw.
      MODIFY vbpa FROM wa_xvbpa.
    ENDIF.
ENDIF.
ENDIF.
Regards,
RS

Results Analysis for Projects

Hi Guys,
We use Results analysis for projects and also we use RA in Product Costing.
Can anyone let me know what exactly does this Results Analysis mean ( not in SAP terms ).
I am trying to look for this over help.sap.com and google but could not find information on what exactly this term means.
Also how is this related to WIP?
Please clarify.
Thanks,
Srikanth.

Dear srikusap,
Calculation WIP through the SAP, RA key will play important role. Work in process calculation is diferent from industry to industry.
In SAP RA key will shows the WIP amount while u running KKAX Transaciton Code. After when ever u do the settlement then ti will be settled to Financial Account. At that time A Accounting Document was generaged. when ever the Order Status is Teco then the provious period WIP will be reversed.
Revert back if u any calrification.
Raj

S_ALR_87012168 - Due Date Analysis for Open Items - How to add a column?

Hello,
I am trying to add a characteristic to the output of this report. I am trying to add the Reference field from BKPF to the list of available characteristics to choose from. It is available in the dynamic selections list so the field should be available in the program, I am just not sure how to get it onto the char. list.
S_ALR_87012168 - Due Date Analysis for Open Items
Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Sorry but had to go in a different direction...
Thanks!

S_ALR_87012168 - Due Date Analysis for Open Items - Add Characteristics?

Hello,
I am trying to add a characteristic to the output of this report. I am trying to add the Reference field from BKPF to the list of available characteristics to choose from. It is available in the dynamic selections list so the field should be available in the program, I am just not sure how to get it onto the char. list.
S_ALR_87012168 - Due Date Analysis for Open Items - SAP delivered Report Painter report.
Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Try:
Go to -> Line items
You can change the display variant there to include the reference.
Rob

S_ALR_87012078 - Due Date Analysis for Open Items display changers

Hi
I need to change this reports( S_ALR_87012078 - Due Date Analysis for Open Items ) display type to column display. How can I do that. I thought of uesing GoTO> Colum display but it is inposible 'cos always they are in inactive mode even in the change mode. pls advice on this
Thanx

Hi
did u try S_ALR_87012077
Thank You,

Pricing For Text Item in Sales Order

Hi ,
How to give price for text item in sales order.
With regards.
Afzal

Hi Afzal,
consider to create a single service material as a generic one, type DIEN, with basic data and sales org views, with item category group LEIS (it will determine item category TAX in sales order). Material description could be "Don't forget to change me!" so in sales order user remembers to changes the description according to the especific sales order requirements.
Regards,
JM

Results Analysis for Contracts

Dear Experts,
My Client requires to do Results Analysis for Contracts. Please share your thoughts.
Regards,
Shareeq

Dear Ahemad,
In what would be the output of the result analysis ?I mean from sales point of view if u see then u will have to develop the report accordingly.
If you are talking abt the MM contract then there are some std reports available.
If ur talking abt the customer service point of view then we this std transaction IP51.
thanks and regards
raghav

Results analysis for a project to be settled to sales order rather than PSG

Hi Experts
My client has two company codes.
CC1 executes project construction for CC2. This is to be mapped as a customer project.
As far as project settlement is concerned, since PA is not activated, it is proposed to settle to sales order item.
In this situation, what would be effect of results analysis.
With out PA, how the postings need to be handled with WIP, Reserves, Inventory and Revenue.
warm regards
ramSiva

Hi,
I have had this problem earlier, If PA is not abailable you have put in the settlement rule as not to be settled.
And for the postings have to be managed using the GL accounts that we give in the result analysis configuration. There is not much flexibility for customization here in this scenario. But you can do as much as possible using the diffrent result analysis categories.
So for the reserves WIP inventory and revenue use result analysis category to segregate them by GL account
Thanks
Naveen

Result analysis for sub-items on SD-order

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for