Result of agent resolution does not agree with agents of task

Hello Experts,
I am trying to configure a workflow for Employee Travel expense, the Business object am using is BUS2089 for event CREATED.
And am configuring workflow task WS20000040 (Approve trip). and in the work flow builder I am assigning User as an Agent and fixing it to a user say "USER1" for Task 404 (Check trip facts) and for Task 416 (Approve trip facts) again am assigning User as an Agent and fixing it to user say "USER2"
Now when the Trip is saved using PR05, this work flow is triggerred - which is what i want and it sends work item to USER1, now when USER1 says Trip facts are consistent the work item should go to USER2 but here it is failing and the log says "Agent determination for step 0000000416 failed" and details say "Result of agent resolution does not agree with agents of task" which is SWF_RUN 544
Can you guys help me by telling where am going wrong. Am i missing some configuration somewhere.
I have changed the Task properties - Attributes i have changed the task as a General Task,(i did it by navigating through Control Tab of the task)
appreciate your response.. Thanks
Usman

Thanks Novjot
I made the task as a general task and i see a gree light adjacent to it, but still it doesn't work.
the way i made it as a general task is as follows:
1. in the navigation area - select task 416
2. In the right hand side, on Control Tab in Task properties, click on the Red button and maintain Agent assignment
3. In Agent Assignment change attributes to General Task - instead of General Forwarding allowed.
save and activate, and generate runtime version
Is this correct or any other way?
Thanks
Usman

Similar Messages

Error: Result of agent resolution does not agree with agents of task

Hi,
I'm getting the error "Result of Agent Resolution does not agree with agent of Task". I'm passing the agents in Expression which I'm getting from Method in my previous step and passing to workflow container and it is getting passed to Expression. The userid is present in that container. And the Task is assigned as General Task but still I dont know what might be the problem. The ID is with 'US' prefix. Even if I give the userid directly in the Task, it shows the same error.
Regards,
JMB

Hi
Incase you are using different clients for development and testing, make sure in testing client, task is assigned as general task.
You may check the way the userid is passed. Please note that the US is object type and Object ID(user id) is different. Both of them should not be part of one string. So while you test, just pass the user id without a prefix US. Hope it will work for u.
Regards
Waz

Agent resolution does not agree with agents of task

Hi Guys,
I extended B.O-IDOCAPPL to ZIDOCAPPL to catch the inbound error for the IDOC.
The workflow gets triggered correctly when we get the inbound error.
In the workflow i created a custom display method....this is a dialog method. Now when the workflow comes to this point it gives the message in the technical log
<i>" Result of agent resolution does not agree with agents of task" </i>
<b>Now instead of calling this method if i just put a user decision it shows up fine in the users inbox.</b>
I have tried SWU_OBUF , Refresh from SWUS , Refresh from Inbox
Nothing seems to work, anyidea as to what's happening here ?
Message was edited by:
Abhishek Dhoundiyal

I have tried :
1.) hardcoding user ID
2.) using a role
3.) using WF initiator...
This is set up as a general task......
One interesting observation that i had... (If the below is irrelevant please ignore)
If i run the task via SWUS it executes but still does not evaluate the agents.. and then if i execute the workitem in SWIA it lets me execute...
Now if i trigger the workflow it executes but still does not evaluate the agents but it does not allow me to execute the workitem in SWIA , the technical log says workitem not found.

Error " Selected numbers does not agree with transferred"

Hi,
While in production support I got a issue saying
Error " Selected numbers does not agree with transferred"
How to solve this.
Regards
San Reddy

Hi,
This doesnt mean that its a failure.
I will suggest you to check a few places where you can see the status
1) SM37 job log (In source system if load is from R/3 or in BW if its a datamart load) (give request name) and it should give you the details about the request. If its active make sure that the job log is getting updated at frequent intervals.
Also see if there is any 'sysfail' for any datapacket in SM37.
2) SM66 get the job details (server name PID etc from SM37) and see in SM66 if the job is running or not. (In source system if load is from R/3 or in BW if its a datamart load). See if its accessing/updating some tables or is not doing anything at all.
3) RSMO see what is available in details tab. It may be in update rules.
4) ST22 check if any short dump has occured.(In source system if load is from R/3 or in BW if its a datamart load)
5) SM58 and BD87 for pending tRFCs.
Once you identify you can rectify the error.
If all the records are in PSA you can pull it from the PSA to target. Else you may have to pull it again from source infoprovider.
If its running and if you are able to see it active in SM66 you can wait for some time to let it finish. You can also try SM50 / SM51 to see what is happening in the system level like reading/inserting tables etc.
If you feel its active and running you can verify by checking if the number of records has increased in the data tables.
SM21 - Job log can also be helpful.
In your case its probably because of tRFC issue.
Check SM58 / BD87 for pending tRFCs.
Thanks,
JituK

Field catalog does not agree with the fields of the functional area

G'day everyone,
I am using a generic extractor via infoset to extract data from R/3 source system.
Using RSA3, I have obtained an error message and no further details.
****ERROR MESSAGE
"Field catalog does not agree with the fields of the functional area
Message no. RSUQ134
****ERROR MESSAGE
I have checked and adjusted my infoset in SQ02 and they seems fine but still obtain the same error.
In BW, replicated the datasource and activate the transfer rules but still obtain the same error.
Anyone knows how to get more details for this type of error? Or how to fix this problem?
Regards
Wayne

I think I have just solved it.
Transaction RS02 delete and recreate after checking the structure in BW and Source system are the same.
Cheers

BW: Data Packages Selected number does not agree with transferred

Hi,
I am running into an issue with an existing master data text load process chain in Production. The extractor is from ERP and there are only 159 records. What is happening is the chain is stuck on yellow but there is an issue with the data packages. The status error message is 'Missing data packages for PSA table'. Clicking into the Details tab the message then states Data Package 1: arrived in BW; Processing: Selected number does not agree with transferred.
The version is BI 7.0. I have done the following steps and still no luck. Looking for any suggestions. Thanks.
ERP
    SM37 (Job always finishes)
    SM58 (No IDOCS stuck)
    ST22 (No short dumps)
BW
    SM58 (No IDOCS stuck)
    SM37 (Job always finishes)
    ST22 (No short dumps)
Reactivated Datasource: RSDS_DATASOURCE_ACTIVATE_ALL
Reactivated Transformation: RSDG_TRFN_ACTIVATE

Hi
Just check whether source system connection is ok in RSA1.
if it is fine then have a loo at the below thread(last post)
Data Load from R/3 to BW-'Selected number does not agree with transferred'
Regards,
Venkatesh

Windows partition utility does not agree with fdisk

The background for this is here. Tl;dr: I created 3 primary partitions (SYSTEM, C:, shared data) and two logical (/boot and /) for a dual boot system, and ran into issues with chainloading from win7 with EasyBCD. To troubleshoot, I simplified the setup to 3 primary partitions, and am now trying to go back... but can't!
Method:
- Delete all volumes/partitions after C:
- Create primary partition of ~100G, NTFS formatted (shared data)
- Create logical partition of 256M, unformatted (/boot)
- Create logical partition with remaining space, unformatted (encrypted /)
I used the built-in win7 partition utility for this, and it looks like it worked: screenshot
My first alert was the fact that Minitool Partition Wizard didn't agree with win7: screenshot
In fact, trying to create logical partitions with Minitool reports that the operation was successful, but as soon as it completes they turn back into unallocated space. I actually tried this first and then went with the win7 utility as I thought something was wrong with Minitool. I'm starting to think it's the other way around and that Minitool sees the correct state and win7 is wrong. That diagnosis comes from the output of fdisk via booting an Arch installation image:
Invalid flag 0x7d9b of EBR (for partition 5) will be corrected by w(rite).
Disk /dev/sda: 238.5 GiB, 256060514304 bytes, 500118192 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x1e6513b3
Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sda1 * 2048 2101247 2099200 1G 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda2 2101248 172433407 170332160 81.2G 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda3 172433408 387473407 215040000 102.6G 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda4 387473408 500115455 112642048 53.7G f W95 Ext'd (LBA)
/dev/sda5 2961659748 5859253686 2897593939 1.4T 65 Novell Netware 386
No idea whatsoever on the type ID assigned to /dev/sda5, nor why it shows as 1.4T. I've tried various things with no success:
- check/fix errors via win7 drive properties (no errors found)
- delete all non-win7 partitions, grow the partition to the full disk, and then shrink back again
- shrink win7 to ~80G, create a single primary partition, boot Arch install media, format with ext4, `dd if=/dev/zero of=file.txt` until full, then delete file
- change order (2 logicals, then primary)
- format the logicals with NTFS upon creation instead of leaving them unformatted
- assigning drive letters upon creating the partitions vs. no drive letter
I'm hesitant to just do everything from fdisk, as I have McAfee Endpoint Encryption and I'm not sure if writing the partition table from outside of windows can possibly ruin anything related to how the startup decryption works. If someone can assure that dd'ing some number of bytes on /dev/sda would allow me to reverse the process (restore said bytes to the beginning of the drive) in the event of any failures, I'd be willing to give that a shot. I know I've dd'd the encrypted MBR in the past and successfully restored it (after trying to install grub instead of the windows bootloader) just fine and been able to boot again. Not sure if messing with the partition table is any different.
Thanks for any suggestions!

Hi Pradhiba and A.H.P,
I got this problem yesterday and I tried all steps mentionned in this message of yours. Just for your information I checked the following points also (maybe it helps you to analyse better the problem):
System Analysis:
1. SE16 T000
2. SE16 RSBASIDOC in both systems
3. SU01 PROFILES
    BWREMOTE       > To be checked
    ALEREMOTE   and profile S_BI-WX_RFC   see note 150315 > To be checked
4. WE20 Partner Profile LS settings in both are OK
    BW outbound RSRQST
            inbound RSINFO RSSEND
    R/3 outbound RSINFO RSSEND
                             inbound RSRQST
    also check 'RSSEND' in R/3
BIDOCTYP = ZSUB161 > To be checked
5. SM59 .. appears to be ok
6. check inconsistency in tables RSISOSMAP and RSOSFIELDMAP
   SE16 BW for table RSISOSMAP
7. SE16 BW for table RSOSFIELDMAP
     no 'T' entries
8. in BW > source system
The remote users for calling and sending data must have the type
   Dialog or CPIC (see Note 161570).
9. Run the report RS_TRANSTRU_ACTIVATE_ALL (activate all BW structures)
10. check entries on the table bdls
Maybe I will re-check all this again today.
In the mean time I will appreciate any other suggestions that you may have about this issue.
Thanks,
PL.
Message was edited by: Paulo Lie
Message was edited by: Paulo Lie

Purchased music on Macbook Pro does not agree with the purchased music on iPad.

I have current versions of all software. And just bought a new iPad. When examining purchased music in iTunes on my MacBook Pro, it is pointing to current purchases over the past few years. But when examining purchases in iTunes on new iPad, it is pointing to very old purchases made several years ago. The purchases to do not agree - they are not in sync. I want them both to be in sync, or at least have both devices point to the current purchase list. Thanks in advance.

I have my iPhone attached via USB cable to my MacBook Pro.
I have been able to successfully sync my calendar now by activating iCloud on my iPhone and via System Preferences on my MacBook Pro after I learned that Maverick does not provide iSync.
However, I have a new problem: The calendar does not "upgrade" (it gets stuck) and I receive a "403" error and it gets stuck in a loop that I have to force quit. I have looked that up in the forum, but wasn't able to solve this issue because the solutions are way to technical and out of my league.
Very disappointed development as removing calendar from iCloud now also deletes all my entries on the Mac.

Vendor ageing does not agree with General ledger balance

Good day all
I have the following problem: I am trying to get a detailed ageing breakdown for our vendor liabilties as on the 30.06.10. The ledger shows a balance of approximately 1.7m but the vendor ageing report shows a balance of apprx. 1.802m when I set the ageing date to 30.06.10. I tried all possible other settings to run the ageing report but always get the same result. Does anyone know what the problem might be? Thanks in advance
Andreas

Hi Andreas,
Have you selected including zero balance ?
Check these for more info:
Re: Customer Receivables Aging Problem
Accurate historical AP aging
Thanks,
Gordon

Event date does not agree with photo dates in the event

Mavericks
Iphoto 9.5.1
I have made a new event and put lots of genealogy pictures for one family member in it. I changed all the photos to Jan 4, 2002. These are docs, pics, obits, etc. Thus I have given this one person this date. Other family names have another date. I modified all the original files within each event.
Beside this couples name on the "Event" label it says Jan 3, 2002 - August 23, 2014. Therefore it shows itself in the Jan 3, 2002 group of people. That is about 20 family groups up the page.
I have done the following:
     --Made sure that there are no pictures with the date Jan 3, 2002 in the event
     --Have taken all the pictures in the event and separated them out into new events--census, certificates, pictures, obits, etc. Thought I would trick the event to restarting!
     --Did a "select-all" of that event and created a new event--same thing.
     --Closed down iPhoto and started over again.
I have no idea why the Jan 3, 2002 is showing up. These are one side of the family. The January 4 is the other side!
On August 23, 2014, I did take a couple of the cemetery pictures in this event. However, they were given the new date of January 4 and Modified the original files using the checkbox. I put the same picture in another family member's event and it is OK. I
Hope I have given enough details.

I think I have solved it! After much frustration and then writing for help, I was not to be stopped. I kept looking up other helps and one person suggested that one of the pictures might be a problem. So I tried that approach. I made an event just out of the "possible" problem pix (the August 2014 date.) It was not causing a problem in another event, however.   From that event with the same pix, I exported the pix to the desktop, and then imported the pix back into iPhoto. Then I put them into the event that was having the problem. So far so good. The date of the event matches all the dates of the photos. I will now delete the "problem children."
Maybe this will help someone else.

ITunes does not agree with iPod

I am trying to update my iPod (20GB version 3.1) i have about 14.5 GB of music. When I started trying to update the music last night i had just erased all the music off of the iPod so it was completely empty. I plugged it in and went to sleep when i work up it had transfered a little bit of music over night but my computer had reset itself overnight. I reopened iTunes and only about 35 songs had been transfered. When i plugged it in iTunes said that it has 7.32GB of music already on it. but then directly below that it says that i have 143MB of music on my iPod and my iPod says that as well. SO now when i try to put my music on there it says that there is not enough room and that it wants to put a slected playlist of music on. The iPod says it has 18.5GB free. I do not understand why they are not corralating. I am running on version 5 of iTunes. someone please help me!!!! I am leaving for a trip in about 24 hours and i would really really like to have a working iPod with me.

Welcome to Apple Discussions.
Restore the iPod, and try to sync again.

License value written off does not agree with total of assigned documents

Hi,
We have a license in GTS with a total written off value that is greater then the total value of all the orders assigend to it. I believe this may have been caused by an issue we had with transferring the orders from R3 to GTS. We had a large order taht was failing to completely transfer due to the log in GTS being full. We changed the config to delete the old logs and only save the ne wlog and the ordre now transfers correctly. However, it looks like an item is still incorrectly written off the license. I ahve tried removing and reassigning the license etc with no luck. Is ther a prgm or tcode that can be used to recalculate the correct written off/assigend balance on a license?
Thanks,
Brian Sisco
PW GTS

No. You would need to cancel the docs in ECC or at least reverse it.

Battery Status Level In Desktop Manager Does Not Agree With Battery Level Indicated On My Curve 8330

I just got a new Curve 8330 from Verizon. It came with a Desktop Manager 4.3 disc. I installed it, but then learned that version 4.7 was available. I uninstalled 4.3 and downloaded and installed 4.7 from RIM. When I started to charge my Curve via USB cable to my PC, the Desktop Manager showed a battery charge of 37%. My Curve was 100% charged later in the day, but the Desktop Manager still indicated it was only 37% charged. I uninstalled 4.7 and reinstalled it, per advice of Verizon. Then the Desktop Manager correctly showed a battery charge of 100%. But as I used my Curve and used up battery to a 50% level (as indicated on the Curve), the Desktop Manager still showed a 100% charge. A minor glitch with the Desktop Manager software? Any solutions? Thanks.

it's a glitch. The(false) value can be updated by going into the Help menu if I recall correctly.
The search box on top-right of this page is your true friend, and the public Knowledge Base too:

Result of Agent resultion doesnot agree with agents of task

Hi,
i am getting the following error for Zdecission task Result of Agent resultion doesnot agree with agents of task .
This may be due to possible agents for task.
where i need to do possible agents classification for task.

You go to transaction Code
PFTC->Standard Task->Provide respective standard Task->Change->Additional Data from menu->Agent assignment->Maintain->Create Agent assignment button top left
Thanks
Arghadip

Auto-Detect Screen Resolution Does Not Work Across Multiple Monitors With Different Resolutions

Hi,
The Acrobat Pro DC (15.007.20033.2203) auto-detect screen resolution feature does not work with multiple monitors at different resolutions. Acrobat looks fine on my hidpi primary laptop display (Razr 14" 2014) but is completely unusable if I drag or extend the application to a standard HD resolution secondary monitor. Dragging Acrobat from my primary desktop display to the secondary display causes the UI elements to become 2x as large as they should be and makes Acrobat unusable.
Is there a way to make Acrobat auto-detect the display that it is currently on?
Thanks!
-Donald

To prevent it from happing again, you can
1. go to the Mouse preference and turn off the scroll zoom feature.
2. go to the Universal Access preference and disable the zoom features.

Result of agent resolution does not agree with agents of task

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for