Result row does not hide value

Hi all,
I have some calculated key figures that are using formula variables to get dates to do calculations on.
Since summing up date values does not lead to anything meaningful, I selected the 'Hide' value in the 'Calculate results as...' section.
However, the results row is still showing an 'X' in this column when I run the query.
I have one calculated key figure for a date using this same method (formula variable from an infoobject) and the result row is hidden correctly.
Does anyone have any idea on why the result row would still display even though it supposed to be hidden?
Thanks in advance.

result rows needs need to be suppressed for characteristic properties.
in query designer , click on characteristics in your reports ( i.e rows ) goto display property supress the result rows..

Similar Messages

Result set does not fit; it contains too many rows

Dear All,
We are in BI7 and running reports on Excel 2007. Even though number of rows limitation in Excel 2007 is more than 1Million, when I try to execute a report with more than 65k records of output, system is generating output only for 65k rows with message "Result set does not fit; it contains too many rows".
Our Patch levels:
GUI - 7.10
Patch level is 11
Is there any way to generate more than 65000 rows in Bex?
Thanks in advance...
regards,
Raju
Dear Gurus,
Could you please shed some light on this issue?
thanks and regards,
Raju
Edited by: VaraPrasadraju Potturi on Apr 14, 2009 3:13 AM

Vara Prasad,
This has been discussed on the forums - for reasons of backward compatibility I do not think BEx supports more that 65000 rows .... I am still not sure about the same since I have not tried out a query with more that 65K rows on excel 2007 but I think this is not possible...

Resulting grid does not contain at least one row, one column and one POV

I have upgraded to 9.3.3 recently.
We have a front end app which will run MDX queries to retrieve data.
Sometimes based on the users selections MDX query might get back nothing i.e will get #missing across all rows/columns and this works fine with the existing 9.3.1 essbase server.
If I run the same query against a 9.3.3 essbase cube I get the error "Resulting grid does not contain at least one row, one column and one POV. If you have any suppress row options selected pls clear them."
I DO NOT have Supress missing data/zero enabled. Not sure why I get this error even though I dont have that option enabled.
Essbase 9.3.3 on HP-UX ITanium 11.31
APS 9.3.3 on win 2003 R2
Smartview 9.3.3 - also tried with smartview 9.3.1.6 and see the same error.
Any suggestions to fix this issues?

The front end is using a VBA command "hypexecutequery" and with 9.3.3 essbase I get a return code -9 which means Operation was cancelled as per the smartview doc.
In 9.3.1 essbase I get the return code 0 which means the query is fine even if it does not return any data.
The query I am using now will return nothing as it is a check to see if there is any data. But with 9.3.3 Essbase I get an error code -9 which looks like it does not like the syntax or something.
Any suggestions?

Result row is not showing expected result

Dear All ,
I have below requirement to generate mix variance
PY Mix
PY Mix Diff
PY Mix
Val Gr -
0.00
0.00
1,015.6823529
1,015.68
0.00
0.00
52,486.5048653
52,486.50
0.00
0.00
2,836.1166667
2,836.12
0.00
0.00
45,582.8437071
45,582.84
Result
0.00
3,09,668.66
-2,07,747.5092285
1,01,921.15
Result in Bex
Expected Result
PY Mix L- Used No definition in   Result
Val Gr -    Used Sum in result
PY Mix Diff = Val Gr - PY Mix
But above formula is not working for Result row ??
expected 3,09,668.66 but showing 0.00
Any ideas to crack this .
All your valuable inputs are highly appreciated .
Regards ,
Hari

Dear Suman
Thank you so much for your reply .
PY Mix and Val Gr KFs both key figures has got same definition(Same formula ).So i cant use Summation for both KYF in Exp Agge
For Val Gr   -Result Row should be sum of values in Column , i have maintained no settings .And showing value as expected
Val Gr -(CKF)
1,015.68
52,486.50
2,836.12
45,582.84
1,01,921.15 -Result (Sum along columns)
For PY Mix - Result Row should be as per formula defined , i have maintained summation in Exp aggregation .And showing value as expected
PY Mix -(CKF)
1,015.68
52,486.50
2,836.12
45,582.84
-2,07,747.50-Result (According to formula used )
But When i use these to kyf in another formula Result row are not calculating as per Expectation
PY MIX DIFF = Val Gr - PY Mix
                          3,09,668.66 (expected )
                        = 0 (but final result )
any other inputs to make it
Regards ,
Hari

Function Module does not fetch value

Hi All,
I am using the fm RV_PRICE_PRINT_HEAD to fetch condition records. When I run this fm in SE37 for a particular document(vbeln) number, the values are fetched correctly into the internal tables TKOMV and TKOMVD.
The same fm does not fetch values when I run for second time for the same document(vbeln). This means :
1) I will go to SE37, type RV_PRICE_PRINT_HEAD, supply the export parameters in COMM_HEAD_I, execute it and obtain the condition records (Till this time absolutely fine)
2) Now, press Back (F3), Let the export parameters in "COMM_HEAD_I" will remain same. Just press Execute (F8). Then condition values are not fetched.
Could any body help in this regard...
Thanks
Thimmappa Hegde

Hi
 I have given you the other alternative bcoz there is a limitation while calling this FM: RV_PRICE_PRINT_HEAD.
If you see the comments and code of Include: LV61AA11, you can understand the problem.
* mechanism to controll which conditions are already part of table TKOMV
Every time a pricing result is read from database the key is put into
TABGL. Also TABGL is updated if we've lines in TKOMV assigned to a
special key but entry in TABGL (case 2).
Originally TABGL was established to handle following pathological
case: condition successfully read from DB -> entry in TABGL. Then all
read conditions where deleted during processing (e.g. manually
deletion etc.). If we run into this routine again no records should
be redetermined from DB...
read table tabgl with table key knumv = komk-knumv
 transporting no fields.
Case 1:
conditions have been already read because there is a fitting entry in
TABGL. Exit immediately if caller doesn't want to force DB access.
if sy-subrc eq 0. ---> First time SY-SUBRC NE 0 so no problem
 if generell_lesen ne 'X'. --> Later runs SY-SUBRC eq 0 and generell_lesen value is SPACE.
 exit.
 endif.
else.
Hope this clarifies your doubt now.
Kind Regards
Eswar

Preferred Vendor serch help does not retrieve values

Hi,
SRM 5.0, Classic scenario
I have successfully replicated the Vendors. But I don't see the vendors in the "search help" when I create a SC.
It seems to me that I have implement the OSS note 845883. Can someone please confirm it.
With regards,
Pranav

Hi,
Apply this note and it should fix your problem:
Note 845883 - Preferred vendor search help does not retrieve values
Some other useful OSS notes ->
968251 BBPSC02:In source of supply preferred vendor not validated
1017288 SRM@ERP : no vendor replication into follow-on documents
831833 Search help for preferred vendor does not update data
980450 Shopping cart: search help for preferred vendor
860886 Incorrect search results for deleted 'Preferred Vendor'
711197 Preferred vendor not copied from template
739531 Preferred vendor/service agent must not be changeable
733899 Complete shopping cart: Preferred vendor disappears
634794 Preferred vendor: partner not found
726102 Performance in vendor search help
647760 Shopping cart: Preferred vendor / partner not
BR,
Disha.
Pls reward points for useful answers.

Data row does not have a matching index row in index

Dear All,
While checking Database Consistency, i m getting following error.
Please Advice
reagrds,
Hiten.
Microsoft SQL Server 2005 - 9.00.2047.00 (Intel X86)
     Apr 14 2006 01:12:25
     Copyright (c) 1988-2005 Microsoft Corporation
     Enterprise Edition on Windows NT 5.2 (Build 3790: Service Pack 2)
Msg 8951, Sev 16, State 1, Line 17 : Table error: Table 'fsg.JEST' (ID 451949132). Data row does not have a matching index row in index 'JEST~I' (ID 2). Possible missing or invalid keys for the index row matching: [SQLSTATE 42000]
Msg 8955, Sev 16, State 1, Line 17 : Data row (3:3447709:85) identified by (MANDT = '009' and OBJNR = 'OR015000015467' and STAT = 'I0010') with index values (MANDT = '009' and STAT = 'I0010' and INACT = ' ' and OBJNR = 'OR015000015467'). [SQLSTATE 42000]
Msg 8951, Sev 16, State 1, Line 17 : Table error: Table 'fsg.JEST' (ID 451949132). Data row does not have a matching index row in index 'JEST~I' (ID 2). Possible missing or invalid keys for the index row matching: [SQLSTATE 42000]
Msg 8955, Sev 16, State 1, Line 17 : Data row (4:3526223:65) identified by (MANDT = '009' and OBJNR = 'OV000005347300000001' and STAT = 'I0010') with index values (MANDT = '009' and STAT = 'I0010' and INACT = ' ' and OBJNR = 'OV000005347300000001'). [SQLSTATE 42000]
Msg 8951, Sev 16, State 1, Line 17 : Table error: Table 'fsg.JEST' (ID 451949132). Data row does not have a matching index row in index 'JEST~I' (ID 2). Possible missing or invalid keys for the index row matching: [SQLSTATE 42000]
Msg 8955, Sev 16, State 1, Line 17 : Data row (4:3526223:66) identified by (MANDT = '009' and OBJNR = 'OV000005347300000001' and STAT = 'I0052') with index values (MANDT = '009' and STAT = 'I0052' and INACT = ' ' and OBJNR = 'OV000005347300000001'). [SQLSTATE 42000]
Msg 8951, Sev 16, State 1, Line 17 : Table error: Table 'fsg.S022' (ID 1022587377). Data row does not have a matching index row in index 'S022~A' (ID 2). Possible missing or invalid keys for the index row matching: [SQLSTATE 42000]
Msg 8990, Sev 16, State 1, Line 17 : CHECKDB found 0 allocation errors and 3 consistency errors in table 'fsg.JEST' (object ID 451949132). [SQLSTATE 01000]
Msg 8955, Sev 16, State 1, Line 17 : Data row (3:3369530:8) identified by (MANDT = '009' and SSOUR = ' ' and VRSIO = '000' and SPMON = '000000' and SPTAG = '20080913' and SPWOC = '000000' and SPBUP = '000000' and WERKS = '7100' and ARBPL = 'METALST4' and KAPAR = '003' and MATNR = 'JGR0500236G0WL8JH' and AUFNR = '015000015467' and PLNUM = '00000000' and POSNR = '0001' and PLNFL = '000000' and VORNR = '0020') with index values (MANDT = '009' and SSOUR = ' ' and VRSIO = '000' and WERKS = '7100' and ARBPL = 'MMsg 8951, Sev 16, State 1, Line 17 : Table error: Table 'fsg.AFRU' (ID 1166000397). Data row does not have a matching index row in index 'AFRU~ZA1' (ID 31). Possible missing or invalid keys for the index row matching: [SQLSTATE 42000]
Msg 8955, Sev 16, State 1, Line 17 : Data row (3:3409400:2) identified by (MANDT = '009' and RUECK = '0000223395' and RMZHL = '00000001') with index values (MANDT = '009' and BUDAT = '20080913' and ARBID = '10000042' and AUFPL = '0000053473' and AUFNR = '015000015467' and STOKZ = ' ' and STZHL = '00000000' and RUECK = '0000223395' and RMZHL = '00000001'). [SQLSTATE 42000]
Msg 8990, Sev 16, State 1, Line 17 : CHECKDB found 0 allocation errors and 1 consistency errors in table 'fsg.S022' (object ID 1022587377). [SQLSTATE 01000]
Msg 8990, Sev 16, State 1, Line 17 : CHECKDB found 0 allocation errors and 1 consistency errors in table 'fsg.AFRU' (object ID 1166000397). [SQLSTATE 01000]
Msg 8989, Sev 16, State 1, Line 17 : CHECKDB found 0 allocation errors and 5 consistency errors in database 'FSG'. [SQLSTATE 01000]
Msg 8958, Sev 16, State 1, Line 17 : repair_rebuild is the minimum repair level for the errors found by DBCC CHECKDB (FSG). [SQLSTATE 01000]
Job 'SAP CCMS Check Database FSG [20080802184156]' : Step 1, 'Step1' : Began Executing 2008-09-16 03:00:39
DBCC CHECKDB (FSG) started at Sep 16 2008 3:00AM with Logfile: C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL.1\MSSQL\CCMS_CHECK_DB_HIST_2008.txt [SQLSTATE 01000]

Hi,
1. Go SE14
2. Enter table name JEST and press Edit
3. Click on Indexes Button
4. Double click on index JEST~I
5. Click "Delete Database Index" it will delete the index
6. Now Click "Create Database Index", it will create Database index
7. Click "Activate and adjust Database" button.
This way Index recreated as per the table field.
Repeate above steps for all the indexes which gives error.
This way you can repair all the indexes which gives error

Error msg, "Maximum selection does not contain value 9999999999.

Hi, I am getting this error wile doing Reclassification of HFM Movement.
Error msg, "Maximum selection does not contain value 9999999999 of subassignment HFM CD2 & Asset Type "
in the Data Monitor, ( in Reclass Net Reserve). While running BCF task for a company for period 16/2009
Actually, We have converted the consolidation area from XX(2009) to YY(2010).
Before this task, user has performed the balance carry forward.
My Analysis is as follows:-
Method Used in this Reclassification
RECYX (Reclassify HFM Movement at YE lvl 10)
     TRIGGER
     Items : 100-299, 9900-9999
     HFM Movement Type : O200 to O300
     Posting Level : 10
     TARGET
     Items : 100-299, 9900-9999
     Move : O100C
     Posting Level : 10
     HFM CD2 and Asset type : Ticked
After TEST run in UCMON, the error message comes :-
The "HFM CD2 & Asset Type value 9999999999" is not maintained in Breakdown Categories Y500, Y700 etc.
Breakdown categories in Workbench
Maintained as "OPTIONAL, Initialized value allowed".
Single Selection
1A
1B
AR
GA
Default Selection
99999999999
BCS CUBE
HFM CD2 & Asset Type - coming blank
LOTR
HFM CD2 & Asset Type - Coming blank
Please help to go forward.
In Anticipation,
Deepankar Jain

Thanks a lot Dan for the reply.
Yes, the single selection is 1A, 1B etc, I agree that including this default value 9999999999 in single selection will resolve this issue, but the BREAK DOWN TYPE is OPTIONAL, that means It will also consider a blank value, right?
Also, In the method defined for RECLASSIFICATION in workbench, in the TARGET parameters, the" HFM CD2 and Asset Type" is blank but the "DEFAULT is TICKED" which makes it a mandatory derivation rule.
Please correct me if I am wrong.
Your replies on it are highly appreciated.
Thanks and Regards,
Deepankar

Maximum selection does not contain value 600 of subassignment Subitem-error

Hi All,
I'm getting the following error when i tried to load the file through data stream.
Maximum selection does not contain value 600 of subassignment Subitem
Message no. UCD1038
Diagnosis
The posting item 11100100 has breakdown category BR01 for which a maximum selection was maintained for subassignment Subitem. The current posting value, however, is not in this maximum selection.
System Response
The posting is not possible.
Procedure
Check the maximum selection and the posting.
I have already refered the earlier threads but its of no use for me. I have checked my setting w.r.t to FS item breakdown category, Max selection in breakdown category and sub items all the setting are fine, even i applied the OSS notes no-1074599 still i'm facing the same issue.
Can any one help me with this regards, thanks in advance.
Regards,
Magesh

Hi Dan,
Yes, breakdown category has been assigned with a sub item category which in turn assigned to subitems and this sub item is a part of the sub item category which is assigned in max. selection.
Let me know if you want any more information on the same.
Regards,
Magesh

Table row does not flow to next page

Hi,
I am using deep structure table in adobe form but the content is not flowing to next page.
I have wraped the table in subform, Body Page, subform and table all are flowed and allow page breaks with content is also ticked, still the table row does not flow to next page.
Regards,
Kimaya

Hi Kimaya,
Just drag the table directly on the body page and execute the form. This should take care of the properties required for data to flow on the form.
Thanks

Cannot load svn plugin. Error is "Resulting configuration does not contain the platform."

I am getting the following error when installing the svn
plugin.
Resulting configuration does not contain the platform.
When I just try to find updates I get the same error. Is my
installation messed up or is flex builder a special eclipse
configuration?
Thanks,
Chris

Flex Builder 3 does not come with subversion plugin, so it
must be something you have installed.uninstall that first
P.S you are using official version right?
http://subclipse.tigris.org
here is instructions :
http://subclipse.tigris.org/install.html

Global Navigation dropdown does not hide on mouseout

Hi,
We have a issue in our SharePoint 2010 Site, where the global navigation menu and sub menu does not hide when we move the mouse away. Correct functionality is that on mousehover at top menu, the sub menu should appear and on mouseout, the sub menu should
hide.
But in our case, they do not hide on mouseout, they will hide only when we scroll the mouse. Moreover, the other elements on the page start appearing above the submenus (when we mousehover over the other elements). Please see below:
Top menu1 Top menu2 Top menu3
(on mousehover)
|
menuitem1
menuitem2 -> submenu item1
submenu(other element on page) item2
The above menu and submenu should hide on mouseout but it doesn't and instead the "other element on page" start coming over the sub menu or menu items.
Hope the problem is understood.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Vijay

Thanks for the reply,
but we are stuck in selection of dynamic dropdowns, can you please let me know how to select and apply zIndex property to all the dynamic dropdowns in global navigation.
Regards,
Vijay

Execution results panel does not show deleted records

Hi,
For OWB 10.2.0.2, i can succesfully run the mapping. But the Excution Results panel does not show deleted records. Shows 0 eventhough it actually did delete the records.
Does anyone have suggestions?
Thanks,
Raj

Hi,
According to your post, my understanding is that you saw the different results for everything and people search tabs.
It is by design in SharePoint 2013.
There are four search experiences that are available on a default enterprise Search Center results page. Each search experience uses a different result source.
Everything search experience use Local SharePoint Results sources.
People search experience use Local People Results sources.
Local SharePoint Results specify all items from the local SharePoint search index except People items.
Local People Results specify People items from the profile database of the User Profile service application.
More information:
Understanding result sources for search in SharePoint Server 2013
Best Regards,
Linda Li
Linda Li
TechNet Community Support

Hide Bookmark does not hide the bookmark

Hide Bookmark does not hide the bookmark
I had a swf but the discussion would not allow it

Click the Bookmarks icon in the Safari menu bar to hide or show Bookmarks.

Retirement of asset result doc. does not include current month depreciation

Hi,
While retirement of tangible fixed asset result document does not include current month depreciation. So it makes closing month procedure impossible.
So, what are the configuration have do now to include current month depreciation?
Please help.
Regards,
Swetha

Dear members of this forum,
please have a look at rules of engagement:
Do not ask for points - This forum should be firstly about information exchange; points are an incentive and a way of saying thanks.
Asking for points is like asking someone to say "thank you": The only time we do this in real life is when teaching a child good manners.
Saying it to an adult is insulting, so why do it in the forums? If someone keeps asking questions without awarding points, simply stop answering them or use the abuse button to report it
Best regards
Horst

Result row does not hide value

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for