Resultant Analysis and New GL

Hi All,
My client is implementing ECC 6.0 with New GL functionality.First time i'm working with New GL.
We are using project system Result analysis for customer projects.i would like to know ,what is impact on project Result Analysis with New GL?
We have to make any special settings/configuration when we use New GL?
Any ideas....?
Thanks,
Anusha

Hi Ajay,
Thanks for your reply.we are using dcoument splitting functionality.with document splitting also no special settings/configuration is required?
Thanks,
Anusha

Similar Messages

  • Results analysis and settlement for projects with Sales Order

    Hi Costing Gurus,
    We are implementing SAP for ECO business in ECC 6.0 with SD, FICO and PS modules and we have contracting jobs which will run for longer periods. we are planning to POC method based on actual cost and Progress billing methods in projects. my understanding is that Reasults analysis will be used to calculate the WIP, Reserves, Losses etc.. however revenue has to be recognized using sales and distribution module with (SD-BIL-RR) component. How ever i have started testing this scenario in test system and i have couple of clarifications and seeking some help from experts to correct my understanding.
    i have below questions.
    1. KKA* . results analysis only calculates the amounts (WIP, reserves, losses etc.) or it can update the accounting.
    2. i found from the blogs and online documents FI posting only happens through settlement and it specifies the Profitability segemnt should be used as receiver in Project . is it madatory to use profitablty segemnt. as we are not implementing COPA can i use any other object and what would be the impact of it.
    currenty i have selected update RA key and i could find no FICO documents created with that.
    3. Do i need to use Revenue recognition in SD along RA in controlling to get my accrual posting for recenues. RA can only serve Cost part of the project or it can Revenue accrual also ?
    Seeking expert suggestion on this.
    Thanks
    Murali

    Hello Murali-
    To answer your questions,
    1. When you perform Results analysis, it does not post any accounting documents. Results analysis only does calcuation of WIP etc and when you do corresponding settlement like CO88(production order) or VA88 (sales order), it will post accounting entries.
    2. It is not mandatory to have profitability segment as a receiver. If you are using COPA, then you would need to settle it to COPA in the end. For example in case of make to order environment, sales order can be used as  a cost object and hence the receiver would be a sales order where all the costs would get settled.
    Hope this helps.
    Shail

  • Result Analysis and POC in PS

    Hello All,
    I need to know whether there is direct relationship between POC and RA? Is it necessary to maintain all the config settings for POC if I want to do RA for a Project ? or can RA be done independently of POC?
    Thanks in advance
    Sarang

    RA cannot be done with out POC
    POC is an essential requirement to calculate the accruals and deferrals
    There are various RA methods which basically calculate the POC
    eg
    Cost based -> POC = act cost/ plan cost
    Rev based -> POC = act rev/ plan rev
    Statistical -> POC can be entered manaully using statistical key figures
    Progress Analysis -> POC is based on value from Progress Analysis - you need to set this up if you are using Progress analysis
    So basically you can do RA without Progress Analysis to calculate POC. The determination of this depends on your company's financial policies and regulatory requirements in the country you are operating

  • Results Analysis and TECO

    Hi Experts,
    I am doing a POC based RA.
    I am able to get POC and do the RA.
    When I TECO, I am not able to get the actual rev posted. usually when we TECO actual cost and actual rev should get posted. right?
    What's the difference between RA at 100% and RA at TECO status?
    thanks
    psconsultant

    Thnaks AP. My Question is what RA key we should use to get the actual rev postings when we TECO?
    VLRV?
    psconsultant

  • Result Analysis , Settlement and Revenue

    Dear Gurus,
    I really appreciate if you can help me in resolving the below issue.
    We are using results analysis and settlement processes in our project
    We want to recognize the revenue before billing.
    Is there any way I can post actual revene to financial accounting before doing
    billing through Settlement.
    I would be greatul to you guys if some one can help me at the earliest .
    Thanks,
    Viswas Anantharangachar

    Hi,
    In my understanding this is the requirement of Revenue recognition functionality implementation. This is more SD than PS function. Please use T-Code ‘VF44’ , or ‘VF47’.
    Please remember that the RR functionality was not enough stable in the ver 4.7 so you must have ECC5 in place.
    Enjoy SAP….
    Don’t forget to give points if its useful ans.
    Namskar,
    Ketan Dave

  • Result analysis for sub-items on SD-order

    Hello,
    I would like to know, whether also the document flow for subitems is being checked while executing result analysis.
    Example:
    We have got an SD order, a higher-level item and a sub-item.
    Both of them have assigned the same result analysis key. Within this key it is defined in customizing (OKG3), that the Sales Order Structure is A-"Summarize Plan and Actual Data of Subitems on Highest Item"....so the result analysis for the sub-item is being performg via the higher-level item.
    The higher-level positions is already completed - the delivery is made and also the invoice is created.
    The sub-item is not completed - neighter delivery is made nor the invoice.
    While executing the result analysis for the higher-level item, the status FNBL (final billing) is recognized and all cost are settled from WIP to CO-PA.
    As far as I know, the document flow should be checked withitn the result analysis and based on this the status should be recognized.
    Therefore It seems, that only the document flow from the higher-level item is being checked. If also the document flow from the sub-item is checked, there would be no way to get the status FNBL as the sub-item is not complete.
    Is it SAP standard delivered behaviour?
    Thanks in advance
    Peter

    Thanks Waman,
    I have tried to delete the result analysis key from the sub-item, but still the same result in result analysis...
    Could you tell my the consequences from the 1A setup from the note? It is adviced withitn the note to not use the 1A setup. But we use this and it works fine. Just some messages during the result analysis, that it could not be performed for sub-items, but this has no influence on the values.
    Regards
    Peter
    Edited by: Peter Jankech on Jun 9, 2010 8:57 AM

  • Results Analysis on Sales Orders

    Hi Fellows,
    When i am running the results analysis for Sales orders using KKAK transaction , I do not wish to see the WIP items with 0 Values.So i selected the option " Hide Orders with 0 values in Results List ".
    However I am still getting the WIP items with 0 Value.
    I saw the help for this and it says
    " Note: In some cases individual objects may still appear in the list when both the column "Reserves for unrealized costs" (reserve for unrealized costs + reserve for complaints/commissions) and the column "Reserves for imminent loss" are a sum of multiple value fields and these value fields are checked individually for zero value ".
    From the above, I came to the conclusion that the 0 value items may still come even if we check the box.
    However from the above note, can anyone tell me where i can check the " Reserves for Unrealized Costs " and " Reserves for Imminent Loss " and also how can i know what are the value fields which are adding up to these columns.
    Also it says the Value fields are individually checked for zero value.
    Where can i see the Value fields associated with this Results Analysis and where can i see if the Value fields are assigned a value of zero.
    Please let me know if you have any thoughts on this..
    Thanks in advance..
    Srik

    Hi,
    Check whether Note 501915 - Creation, cancellation, and usage of reserves would help.
    Regards,
    P.S: Please post this question in FI/CO forum so that you can get answers quickly.

  • Post Cost of Sales in PS after Result Analysis

    Hi SAP experts,
    I'm testing SAP EC&O best practice solution at this moment.
    I executed KKAJ (results analysis) and both Cost of Sales and WIP were calculated correctly.
    COS: for a TECO WBS, which already have billing document
    WIP: for other WBS which is still in progress.
    I already saved this results analysis, however, when I execute settlement (CJ8G), I can only find the posting to FI of WIP. (Dr GL WIP account/Cr P&L WIP account). My expect is to have COS posted to FI as well (to recognize COS for the billing of completed WBS above).
    Kindly help me to figure out what I was missing here? I don't know at what step COS will be posted to FI. I searched all configuration document in Best Practice but cannot find any configuration for Results Analysis & Settlement for COS account.
    Thanks so much for your help.
    Andy

    Zeketa,
    Look this with an ABAP consultant, this is an development.
    regards.
    Bruno Araujo

  • No entered status set. No results analysis will be performed

    Hi Guys,
    I keep on getting this error message beloe and the valuation is on RELEASE status
    No entered status set. No results analysis will be performed
    Message no. KJ210
    Diagnosis
    The valuation of the order or project in results analysis depends on the status of the object.
    In this case, the object does not have an active status entered in the valuation methods in Customizing for WIP calculation and results analysis. Consequently, WIP calculation and results analysis cannot find a method with which the object can be processed.
    Procedure
    Decide whether the object should be processed in its current state (indicated by its active status in status management) by WIP calculation and results analysis.
    If you want to process the object:
    In Customizing for results analysis, choose Period-End Closing -> Results Analysis -> Define Valuation Methods for Results Analysis, add an entry for this status, and specify how objects with this status should be processed.
    If you do not want to process the object:
    This message is inconsequential for you. No follow-up actions are necessary.
    In Customizing for results analysis, choose Period-End Closing -> Results Analysis -> Define Valuation Methods for Results Analysis and select the No valuation indicator. This message is then no longer issued by the system.
    Example:
    In the standard system, there is normally no entry in the valuation method for the status CRTD (Created). You will therefore receive this message for objects that only have the status CRTD.

    Hi Guys,
    I manage to run the RA. The problem why I could'nt get it right was because I did not run transaction MMPV to close period for material master
    Thanks for your help.

  • Documents related to Result analysis.

    Dear All,
    I have to use period end activities in my project for that i need some information about Result Analysis.and
    I also request  to send me Configuration Document of RA .....
    Regards
    Lallan.

    Hi,
    In short please follow these steps:
    1. Maintain RA Key (Tcode :OKG1)
    2. Maintain RA Version  (Tcode :OKG2)
    3. Define Valuation method for RA (Tcode : OKG3)
    4. Define Line ID's
    5. Define Assignment of RA (Tcode :OKG5)
    6. Define Update for RA (Tcode : OKG4)
    7 Define Posting rules for settlement to accounting (Tcode: OKG8)
    8. Maintain the RA Key in Tcode: OPSA Controlling tab, if the Defualt RA key is to be maintained while creation of the project.
    Beside this please follow the link below:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/3d/72369adc56d11195100060b03c6b76/frameset.htm
    Hope its useful.
    Reward points if useful.
    thanks..

  • Results Analysis on WBS Element

    Hi Guys,
    Once we capture the costs on the WBS elements,
    Why do we carry out the results analysis on the WBS elements?? Pls explain.
    Do we carry out both results analysis and settlement simultaneously on WBS elements ..?
    Pls explain.
    Thanks
    Srik.

    Dear srikusap,
    When u carry the RA  through KKAX, then u can able to see the WIP for the WBS.  That is the reason we have to run RA.
    Raj

  • RE: Role of FI/CO consultant in Result Analysis

    hi gurus
    can u explain the Importance of result analysis and what is role of FI/CO consultant. What is process of result analysis. How is will be useful .

    Hi Anand,
    I have q question regarding service order process.
    1.I have created a service contract and service order and costs are allocated on this order. Status of this order is - REL .I did result analysis for this order through KKA1 after that i did settlement by T-code KKO88. The costs on this order have been posted to FI debited to WIP account ( B/S ) and credited to P&L account.
    2.Now iI have changed the status of this order to TECO.
    can you please let me know how to proceed further regarding result analysis and settlement to credit the WIP account ( B/s ) and debit the P&L account because the order status is TECO
    Regards
    Ravi Kumar

  • Results Analysis Sales Order Issue

    Hi Fellows,
    When i am running the results analysis for Sales orders using KKAK transaction , I do not wish to see the WIP items with 0 Values.So i selected the option " Hide Orders with 0 values in Results List ".
    However I am still getting the WIP items with 0 Value.
    I saw the help for this and it says
    " Note: In some cases individual objects may still appear in the list when both the column "Reserves for unrealized costs" (reserve for unrealized costs + reserve for complaints/commissions) and the column "Reserves for imminent loss" are a sum of multiple value fields and these value fields are checked individually for zero value ".
    From the above, I came to the conclusion that the 0 value items may still come even if we check the box.
    However from the above note, can anyone tell me where i can check the " Reserves for Unrealized Costs " and " Reserves for Imminent Loss " and also how can i know what are the value fields which are adding up to these columns.
    Also it says the Value fields are individually checked for zero value.
    Where can i see the Value fields associated with this Results Analysis and where can i see if the Value fields are assigned a value of zero.
    Please let me know if you have any thoughts on this..
    Thanks in advance..
    Srik

    Thx but We are not 11i but 11.0.3 -- older release....I am familiar with the API's and the 'Interface Trip Stop' concept in 11i...

  • Cannot manually maintain result analysis data

    Hi,
    I am running result analysis for sales order(sales order is a cost object). after calculation of result analysis, and when I click on maintain manually button all the values are grayed out and I cannot maintain the values manually.
    Please let me know what could be the problem
    Thanks
    Naveen

    Hi,
    I have checked all the result analysis settings that I know of including the expert mode in the valuation method with no avail.
    can you please let me know what could be wrong?
    Thanks
    Naveen

  • Revenue Recognition Accounting in PS Results Analysis

    I am trying to understand certain aspects in the accountng involved for the process of Results Anaysis. In my case, we have configured RA for revenue recognition and all is working well. We have a project that has a billing element and an account assignment element under it.  Invoices go to the billing element, costs go to the aa elemet. RA key is entered on the billing element. RA calculates Revenues and COS and the billing element settles them to PA. While calculated, defered and unbilled revenue post to FI using OKG8 configuration settings. All is fine on the mechanics of this.
    What I do not understand is the treatment for the actual costs. Are they supposed to be settled to PA as well? If so...then, the costs seem to double up in PA (COS from RA calculated based on the actual costs via the billing element and Actual costs themselves from from the aa element). Are the actual costs supposed to remain in the aa WBS element and not be settled? It seems unbalanced. Can anyone explain?

    Hi,
    Settlement process involves a sender object and a receiver object. Receiver object is the cost object on which actual cost incurred in the sender object is settled. RA is one of the receiver objects for settlement, but not the only one.
    Your scenario seems to be periodic calculation of WIP (result analysis) and final settlement of production orders.
    The periodic WIP (RA) postings done in FI are reversed and replaced with COGM when the production order is finally delivered. The entries in FI at this stage is based on the "Standard Price" maintained in the material master (depending on the valuation variant). Then the final settlement of production order takes place and the total actual cost is arrived at. The difference in cost between "actual cost" and standard price" is settled to RA as a separate entry.
    The reversal of entries when the production is delivered (as explained above) ensures that cost is not reckoned twice.
    Hope this explanation meets your requirement.
    If so, you may like to close the thread. Otherwise, please revert.
    Muraleedharan.R

Maybe you are looking for