Results Analysis 0 Values

Hi Guys,
When we are using the results analysis using KKAK tcode, and  Although we tick the selection hide objects with 0 value we get zero value rows in the output. The files are becoming too large because of this.
Please let me know how to  hide the 0 value items.
Thanks
Srik.

Note: In some cases individual objects may still appear in the list when both the column "Reserves for unrealized costs" (reserve for unrealized costs + reserve for complaints/commissions) and the column "Reserves for imminent loss" are a sum of multiple value fields and these value fields are checked individually for zero value.
This is found on htting F1 when the check box for Hide Zero values is selected. Check if it makes sense.

Similar Messages

  • Result Analysis Values For particular period/year!!

    Hi Experts
    We are in a customer project, tenure of a project is around 2 to 3 years. As company follows Accounting standard AS-7 where we need to recognize the revenues in the same period in which the cost incurred. So, to achieve that we have planned the cost and revenue periodically for the years 2011-2012 ,2012-2013. But when i am running RA (KKA2) the results shows planned revenue and cost  as sum of all the years ,so accordingly POC will be based on overall Plan Cost and not Annual(Period ) based.
    But our requirement is that when i run RA for given period of particular year then RA should show planned cost and revenue for that particular period/year and accordingly  rest of the values like; POC, WIP, Reserves etc.. should get calculated .
    Please suggest how to approach to achieve the same.
    Thanks in advance..

    I think it is possible to meet your requirement through valuation method settings.
    please read sap help on RA.
    Please follow the below path to access the RA help
    SAP help portal -- Financials >> Controlling >> Product Cost Controlling >> Cost Object Controlling >> Product Cost by Sales Order >> Period-End Closing in Product Cost by Sales Order: Scenario >> Result Analysis

  • Result Analysis for TECO status - all values are 0

    Dear guru,
    I've done the configuration for Result Analysis with POC method 03, for project.
    There are 4 relevant status: PREL, REL, FNBL and TECO. TECO is mark as final RA.
    PREL, REL, FNBL are ok, but I face problem with TECO.
    In project I plan cost, plan revenue, and post actual cost through production order. There is no actual revenue.
    However, when I set the status to TECO and run Result Analysis, all the value: plan cost, plan revenue, actual cost,... are 0.
    I confuse why it is happen. Please help me.

    And another point, actual cost can be see in report, but in RA the actual cost is 0, for also other status.
    When I post actual cost through F-02, it is ok. But in this case actual cost is posted to project through confirming production order and receipt material.

  • Result analysis for sub-items on SD-order

    Hello,
    I would like to know, whether also the document flow for subitems is being checked while executing result analysis.
    Example:
    We have got an SD order, a higher-level item and a sub-item.
    Both of them have assigned the same result analysis key. Within this key it is defined in customizing (OKG3), that the Sales Order Structure is A-"Summarize Plan and Actual Data of Subitems on Highest Item"....so the result analysis for the sub-item is being performg via the higher-level item.
    The higher-level positions is already completed - the delivery is made and also the invoice is created.
    The sub-item is not completed - neighter delivery is made nor the invoice.
    While executing the result analysis for the higher-level item, the status FNBL (final billing) is recognized and all cost are settled from WIP to CO-PA.
    As far as I know, the document flow should be checked withitn the result analysis and based on this the status should be recognized.
    Therefore It seems, that only the document flow from the higher-level item is being checked. If also the document flow from the sub-item is checked, there would be no way to get the status FNBL as the sub-item is not complete.
    Is it SAP standard delivered behaviour?
    Thanks in advance
    Peter

    Thanks Waman,
    I have tried to delete the result analysis key from the sub-item, but still the same result in result analysis...
    Could you tell my the consequences from the 1A setup from the note? It is adviced withitn the note to not use the 1A setup. But we use this and it works fine. Just some messages during the result analysis, that it could not be performed for sub-items, but this has no influence on the values.
    Regards
    Peter
    Edited by: Peter Jankech on Jun 9, 2010 8:57 AM

  • Results Analysis on Sales Orders

    Hi Fellows,
    When i am running the results analysis for Sales orders using KKAK transaction , I do not wish to see the WIP items with 0 Values.So i selected the option " Hide Orders with 0 values in Results List ".
    However I am still getting the WIP items with 0 Value.
    I saw the help for this and it says
    " Note: In some cases individual objects may still appear in the list when both the column "Reserves for unrealized costs" (reserve for unrealized costs + reserve for complaints/commissions) and the column "Reserves for imminent loss" are a sum of multiple value fields and these value fields are checked individually for zero value ".
    From the above, I came to the conclusion that the 0 value items may still come even if we check the box.
    However from the above note, can anyone tell me where i can check the " Reserves for Unrealized Costs " and " Reserves for Imminent Loss " and also how can i know what are the value fields which are adding up to these columns.
    Also it says the Value fields are individually checked for zero value.
    Where can i see the Value fields associated with this Results Analysis and where can i see if the Value fields are assigned a value of zero.
    Please let me know if you have any thoughts on this..
    Thanks in advance..
    Srik

    Hi,
    Check whether Note 501915 - Creation, cancellation, and usage of reserves would help.
    Regards,
    P.S: Please post this question in FI/CO forum so that you can get answers quickly.

  • KKAX - error 'Manual WIP/results analysis is not allowed for order

    We are running KKAX on some process orders.  A few of them get the error 'there are values for cost element 999999 that are not assigned to any line ID'; however, we do have a line id set up for the cost element, etc; when we drill down further on the message, what we end up with is 'manual wip/results analysis is not allowed'.  The business transaction for this is KABM.  I can see on the order that KABM is not a permitted business transaction. 
    We only have this problem on a few of the orders.  How is the KABM being invoked?  Is it caused by an order status?  How can I fix this?
    Thank you

    Hi Christian
    i have come up with the new business requirement
    I want to change some of the material in one of the plant into discreete.For that, I tried to delete the production version and then tried to uncheck repetitive manufacturing indictor in MRP4 view.
    But it is giving the following error
    Either you are attempting to delete production version 1000 or
    you haveattempted to deselect the repetitive manufacturing indicator for the production version.
    It is not possible to delete the production version or to
    deselect the repetitive manufacturing indicator for the following reasons:
    o Cutoff period for WIP calculation has not yet been
    established. For the period in which a goods receipt was last entered with reference to this production version.
    o The cutoff period for variance calculation has not been
    defined for the full life of the production version.
    Can you please help me out how to resolve this issue

  • Result Analysis(WIP) not posted after 4 cycle run

    Hi,
    Every month value is posted in Result Analysis GL account for WIP. But we found in period 10 and period 11 value is not posted Result Analysis GL account after running 4 cycle run (Overhead calculation, WIP calculation, Variance calculation and Settlement). What may be reason ??
    Regards,
    Samrat

    Hi Christian ,
    One question related to Cut-Off period regarding WIP calculation which myself and Ajay were discussing 15 days  back..
    Is it required to change the cut-off everymonth when we calculate WIP . In my client.. then donot do that .. but still we calculate the WIP..
    Is the significance of cut-off period is to tell the system the first period to calculate WIP .. during implementation .. My client never changes that and its in a MTS ( Process Order Senario )... but calculates WIP every month.
    Regards
    Sarada

  • Result Analysis Valuation Method 3

    Hi PS Experts,
    The building block document on Profit Realization 'I58_BB_ConfigGuide_EN_DE' says that as per IAS 11 and 18, we need to configure Result Analysis Valuation Method 3 only which is cost based. Is it right and whether you are all having this valuation method in your SAP system where IFRS standards are applicable.
    Then, in addition to this cost based Revenue Recognition through this valuation method 3, we would like to input realistic POC(Engineer's certificate) into the system. Whether it is possible and if so, how and what other valuation method we need to use with or with changes to a particular valuation method. Appreciate your valuable inputs on this.
    Regards!

    Hello,
    Cost based POC i.e Method 3 is compliant with IFRS requirements. Other methods also are so.
    The choice of RA method depends on value/risk/duration/revenue plan of the project. We use this method for high value projects running for a long time where there is a need to recognise revenue before actual billing.
    Completed contract method is also used and very much in accordance with accouning principles.
    For POC calculated through progress determination- say Engineer's certificate- you can use method 7.
    Thanks,

  • Result analysis (KKA2)

    What are the  business prerequisites for the use of revenue-based, cost-based and quantity-based percentage of completion in the result analysis (KKA2)

    In order to comply with accounting standards, the value  of work completed on projects in progress need to be  capitalized. RA is  used for this  purpose.
    For cost based RA, first  calculate the percentage of completion (POC) = actual cost / plan cost * 100
    POC * actual revenue gives the revenue attributable to the work competed  so far (this is called calculated revenue). Compare calculated revenue and actual  revenue booked in GL. This difference in value is capitalized / accrued by SAP when  RA is properly configured.
    This is suitable for consturction projects.
    Revenue based:
    Here the starting point  is  revenue.
    POC = actua  revenue / plan revenue
    calculated cost = POC * plan cost.
    The difference between calculated cost and actual cost is capitalized / loss is recognized.
    Let me know if you have any questions.
    Sridhar

  • Result Analysis Settlement - Posting to FI

    Hi all
    I am configuring Result analysis related configuration to post WIP values to FI on period basis. I did following nodes configuration
    1.  Create Result Analysis Keys
    2.  Define Result Analysis Versions
    3.  Define Valuation Methods for Result Analysis
    4.  Define LIne ID
    5.  Define Assignment for Result Analysis
    6.  Define update for Result Analsysis
    7.  Define posting rules for Settlement to Finanacial Accounting
    We have RA connection with Projects
    After making all above configurations when we are performing KKA2 and CJ88, NO FI documents are getting posted and we are repeatedly getting message as there is no "Accrual" values. 
    We even not getting WIP values at KKA2, though we have eligble values at Project.
    we need to fix that at high priority...
    your inputs are highly appreciated..
    Kindly let me know, if any further clarifications required on this.
    best regards,
    S. Habib Pasha.

    Hi ,
    Based up on the above discussion did you executed any standard cost and revenue reports against the relevant WBS elements and verified that costs and revenue are flowing properly to the project ?
    In the RA are you able to see the WIP Values,Planned values and Actual values for COST and REVENUE ?
    And what are the parameters you maintained in  Settelement Profile ?
    Thanks,
    Sai.

  • Results Analysis Message KJ436

    While setting up Results Analysis for the POC method (03) and executing transaction KKA2, we got the following message. Both the CO version and the RA version are set to the same valuation (Group valuation). Any help would be appriciated.
    Basic RA version must have valuation category "0" (operational valuation)
    Message no. KJ436
    Diagnosis
    If a version has actual data (see basic version setting), it must be relevant to settlement in results analysis (see maintenance of version of results analysis).
    If a version does not have actual data (see basic version setting), it cannot be relevant to settlement in results analysis (see maintenance of the version of results analysis).
    Procedure
    1. Check the basic version setting in the maintenance of the general versions.
    2. Modify the results analysis version to conform to the basic version setting.
    3. Turn the indicator Version relevant to settlement on or off, whichever is appropriate.We are using CO plan version 0 (see below) and it is set for actual and plan. The RA version (0) (also below) is marked as being relevant to settlement. These settings seems to address the error message but I guess we are missing something.

    Hai Mikhail
    As u mentioned u set the RA method for POC3 in OKG3.
    Assuming maintained in OKG3 - the status control ,profit Basis,Valuation Level and its Minimum Values.
    Is the RA version been maintained in  OKG2 ?
    In OKG2 - need to maintain the RA version with respect to the Controlling Area like 0 or 1.
    Is OKG8 has been maintained on the Posting Rules - means where the RA version should have the corrsponding Profit & loss account number and Balance sheet account number.
    Kindly check and verify according to the relevant RA used/picked using OKG1 in Config - OKG2(maintain RA versions), OKG3(valuation methods for RA), Define Line ID's , OKG5 ( Assignment of Cost elements for WIP and RA) , OKG4( update of WIP calculation and RA) , OKG8 ( Posting rules in WIP and RA) .
    If all these maintained u will definetelu get the KKA2 result.
    ENJOY SAP PS
    Regards
    PP

  • Default Results Analysis Key in Internal Order Master Data

    Hi Expert,
    I would like to default specific Results Analysis Key in Internal Order Master Data.
    Please advice is the any configuration can perform that?
    Results Analysis Key is under Period-End Closing tab (Internal Order Master Data)
    Thanks
    regards,
    ng chong chuan

    HI
    1. Go to T code KOM1 > Order Type would $$
    2. CReate an Order and maintain default values in it like Comp code, etc and also the RA key
    3. Now, maintain this model order in your Order Type in KOT2_OPA
    4. Transport this customizing request across to all clients
    BR,Ajay M

  • WIP according local GAAP vs IFRS - only one result analysis key

    Dear experts,
    I am faced with the following issue. We use WBS-elements for long running activities. We set result analysis key on WBS-element for periodic WIP calculation. The actual result analysis key is set up according local GAAP.
    Now we want to implement parallel accounting according IFRS. Here we can use percentage of completion for valuation of our project(s).
    How can we handle two methods of WIP calculation? We can only set one resulat analysis key on WBS element?
    How do you handle this issue.
    Thanks for your reply in advance
    Regards,
    Butch

    Thanks for the quick feedback.
    Maybe some additional information:
    01 - IFRS (real time link with FI)
    02 parallell currency deprec area
    20 - LOCAL GAAP
    50 - Grants IFRS value (investment measure support area)  linked realtime to FI
    51 parallel currency deprec area of 50
    60 - Grants Local GAAP
    I already checked the SAP library and the SDN forum, but could not find anywhere how to set up the depreciation area(Grants LOCAL GAAP) to which the investment measure is not directly linked to (not the support area (50) in Tr ANVEST).
    Is it possible with only one investement key to fill the IFRS (50) & Local GAAP (60) value investment depreciation area and still depreciate them in different ways?
    Thanks again!
    Kr,
    Roeland

  • What is RESULT ANALYSIS,REVENUE RECOGNITION in PS

    hi gurus
    can any one explains me abt revenue recoginition and result analysis in Project Systems
    thx
    regards
    mahesh

    RA cannot be done with out POC
    POC is an essential requirement to calculate the accruals and deferrals
    There are various RA methods which basically calculate the POC
    eg
    Cost based -> POC = act cost/ plan cost
    Rev based -> POC = act rev/ plan rev
    Statistical -> POC can be entered manaully using statistical key figures
    Progress Analysis -> POC is based on value from Progress Analysis - you need to set this up if you are using Progress analysis
    So basically you can do RA without Progress Analysis to calculate POC. The determination of this depends on your company's financial policies and regulatory requirements in the country you are operating

  • Result Analysis Key

    Hi Experts,
    Can any one tell me the significance of Result Analysis Key for an Internal order master record. Why do we use a result analysis key?
    Points Awaiting!!!
    Yasmin

    Hi
    R.A key is just like capitalzation key, which capitalise The WIP .Cost carrier is RA type cost element, which sucks the open production order value(normally at the time of period end closing) and put them on balance sheet till it is closed .  If u need more information look for PDF file"Product cost made easy" released by SAP, you can download this from Yahoo group (Sapficoworld) by clicking on "files" there
    assign points if useful

Maybe you are looking for