Results Analysis Categories

I am trying to understand how Results Analysis works on WBS. Is there any information on this. Some issues we have is
1.CLRV is not equal to VLRV for standard SAP. In our scenario we want to maintain constant margin by accruing cost as a planned percentage of actual revenue. Today CLRV is incorrect but VLRV is correct. Do I need to make both equal? If so how?
Or, can I gnore CLRV since COPA is getting the VLRV values.
2. COSR settlement of accrual/ deferral on another scenario using custom enhancement 1 is equal to total revenue and not accrued amount. Wouldnt this double FI postings? How do I avoid?
3. Is there good documentation on Result Analysis? If so where?
Message was edited by:
        Ning Jiang
Message was edited by:
        Ning Jiang

Hi,
If u are using same COA for both the company codes, why to use secound Controlling area.
Secondly why to Create, config and upload all the master datas,
U can reset the Comp code so the Master data will be deactivated
and u can post it.
Regards,
Padma

Similar Messages

  • Results analysis for a project to be settled to sales order rather than PSG

    Hi Experts
    My client has two company codes.
    CC1 executes project construction for CC2. This is to be mapped as a customer project.
    As far as project settlement is concerned, since PA is not activated, it is proposed to settle to sales order item.
    In this situation, what would be effect of results analysis.
    With out PA, how the postings need to be handled with WIP, Reserves, Inventory and Revenue.
    warm regards
    ramSiva

    Hi,
    I have had this problem earlier, If PA is not abailable you have put in the settlement rule as not to be settled.
    And for the postings have to be managed using the GL accounts that we give in the result analysis configuration.  There is not much flexibility for customization here in this scenario. But you can do as much as possible using the diffrent result analysis categories.
    So for the reserves WIP inventory and revenue use result analysis category to segregate them by GL account
    Thanks
    Naveen

  • Configuring OKG8 in Results Analysis

    When configuring OKG8, the results analysis key is not available for entry in the view. However, results analysis key field (ABGSL) does exist in the underlining table TKKAB. This is limiting when one wants to direct postings to different GL accounts based on the RA key. Using cost elements as a separator is not an option as categories in question are POCI and POCS and apportionment by line id is not supported. Instead the system uses the technical cost element in the RA version to direct postings to FI-GL.
    any idea how to activate RA Key in this table and make the program use it to determine the reight set of GL accounts?
    Thanks,
    Alex

    Hi,
    The standard SAP will allow you to use this. check the RA configuration in OKG9. If still problem exist check the SAP note.
    Regards
    Shantanu

  • Update Result Analysis not allow for category E(Revenue)

    Hi,
    While defining update for Result Analysis for Sales Order Costing - Controlling Area -  RA Version - RA Key for WIP in Sales ORder - Line ID as Revenue - and category E(Revenue), put Secondary GL against  Cost/Revenue in tcode OKG4, system shows message as :
    Use only categories "A", "K", and "N" in WIP calculation
    Message no. KQ115
    Diagnosis
    In the valuation method, you chose WIP calculation as the results analysis type.
    Procedure
    For WIP calculation, you can only update costs ( category K), settled costs (category A), and costs not to be included (category N [revenue], for example).
    As a result while doing WIP on Sales order in tcode KKA3 system shows message as "No update of line IDs specified in CO area 0810 version 0 RA key 000004" in message no KJ208.
    Here RA KEY 000004 is used for WIP on Sales Order. We have defined 4 line ids which are assigned with RA Key for WIP on Actual Cost against category  K (Cost) for 3 line ids and 1 line is used with category A (Settled cost). Same way for RA key Sales Order I have to mention against category E (Revenue). But system does not allow me.
    Best Regards,
    Samat Roy

    Hi Dadoni,
    In OKG3 (Valuation Method) there are two different RA Keys I have maintained. RA Key 000002(WIP of Actual Cost) which is used with production order and RA Key 000004(Result Analysis for Sales Order) is maintained with Sales Order. Both the RA Keys have common status which are REL, DLV, PREL and TECO. Is it correct or wrong staus for Sales Order WIP ? Here status number area 1> PREL, 2> REL, 3> DLV and 4> TECO.
    Kindly tell me for RA Key 000004(WIP on Sales Order) you have mentioned only 3 status which are REL, TECO and FNBL. Is it necessary to maintained more status for Sales order WIP. What will be its status number and inside parameter setting from RA Type to other indicator setting ?
    Best Regards,
    Samrat

  • Sales order item report based on results analysis key and status

    Hi,
    I am trying to find a a report to generate list of sales order items with following selection
            -invoicing status -invoiced/not invoices (other status)
            -result analysis key assigned to this item (VBAP-ABGRS)
            -system status /released/teco
    Basically i am CO consultant and not so familiar with the SD statuses. I tried VA05 and V.26 but all required selections are not available in these reports.
    If no standard report is available in ERP, i would like to have it in BI. Can some help me with table fields for statuses.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Raghu

    Hi Raghu
    Go to SE16 and give VBUK table and execute it there you can select the following feilds and then check wheather they are meeting your requirements or not.If they are meeting your requirements then create a new Z report by copying standard VA05 key feilds. and include the other feilds which you need.So you take your ABAP team help
    Billing status     FKSTK
    Posting Status  BUCHK
    Overall status  GBSTK
    Document category VBTYP
    Regards
    Srinath

  • Result analysis for sub-items on SD-order

    Hello,
    I would like to know, whether also the document flow for subitems is being checked while executing result analysis.
    Example:
    We have got an SD order, a higher-level item and a sub-item.
    Both of them have assigned the same result analysis key. Within this key it is defined in customizing (OKG3), that the Sales Order Structure is A-"Summarize Plan and Actual Data of Subitems on Highest Item"....so the result analysis for the sub-item is being performg via the higher-level item.
    The higher-level positions is already completed - the delivery is made and also the invoice is created.
    The sub-item is not completed - neighter delivery is made nor the invoice.
    While executing the result analysis for the higher-level item, the status FNBL (final billing) is recognized and all cost are settled from WIP to CO-PA.
    As far as I know, the document flow should be checked withitn the result analysis and based on this the status should be recognized.
    Therefore It seems, that only the document flow from the higher-level item is being checked. If also the document flow from the sub-item is checked, there would be no way to get the status FNBL as the sub-item is not complete.
    Is it SAP standard delivered behaviour?
    Thanks in advance
    Peter

    Thanks Waman,
    I have tried to delete the result analysis key from the sub-item, but still the same result in result analysis...
    Could you tell my the consequences from the 1A setup from the note? It is adviced withitn the note to not use the 1A setup. But we use this and it works fine. Just some messages during the result analysis, that it could not be performed for sub-items, but this has no influence on the values.
    Regards
    Peter
    Edited by: Peter Jankech on Jun 9, 2010 8:57 AM

  • Problem with Result Analysis report (KKAK)

    Hello Experts,
    I am facing problem with T-code KKAK, when I am executing this transaction (Results Analysis (RA) on sales orders creates the data for posting to the GL, depending on the sales order (i.e. WIP or COS) ) system is displaying/calculating for all sales order which are already completed (fully shipped and billed), this report displaying in 300 to 400 pages.
    My requirement is  .. is it possible to display only sales orders which are no completed. This will help alot.
    Please help me to solve this problem.
    Thanks
    Sudheer

    Hi,
    in the selection screen of KKAK in "Output options" there is a flag "display closed items".
    Uncheck this and ensure that all completely processed orders have status closed (CLSD).
    Thus they will not be reported anymore.
    BR Christian

  • Results Analysis on Sales Orders

    Hi Fellows,
    When i am running the results analysis for Sales orders using KKAK transaction , I do not wish to see the WIP items with 0 Values.So i selected the option " Hide Orders with 0 values in Results List ".
    However I am still getting the WIP items with 0 Value.
    I saw the help for this and it says
    " Note: In some cases individual objects may still appear in the list when both the column "Reserves for unrealized costs" (reserve for unrealized costs + reserve for complaints/commissions) and the column "Reserves for imminent loss" are a sum of multiple value fields and these value fields are checked individually for zero value ".
    From the above, I came to the conclusion that the 0 value items may still come even if we check the box.
    However from the above note, can anyone tell me where i can check the " Reserves for Unrealized Costs " and " Reserves for Imminent Loss " and also how can i know what are the value fields which are adding up to these columns.
    Also it says the Value fields are individually checked for zero value.
    Where can i see the Value fields associated with this Results Analysis and where can i see if the Value fields are assigned a value of zero.
    Please let me know if you have any thoughts on this..
    Thanks in advance..
    Srik

    Hi,
    Check whether Note 501915 - Creation, cancellation, and usage of reserves would help.
    Regards,
    P.S: Please post this question in FI/CO forum so that you can get answers quickly.

  • Post Cost of Sales in PS after Result Analysis

    Hi SAP experts,
    I'm testing SAP EC&O best practice solution at this moment.
    I executed KKAJ (results analysis) and both Cost of Sales and WIP were calculated correctly.
    COS: for a TECO WBS, which already have billing document
    WIP: for other WBS which is still in progress.
    I already saved this results analysis, however, when I execute settlement (CJ8G), I can only find the posting to FI of WIP. (Dr GL WIP account/Cr P&L WIP account). My expect is to have COS posted to FI as well (to recognize COS for the billing of completed WBS above).
    Kindly help me to figure out what I was missing here? I don't know at what step COS will be posted to FI. I searched all configuration document in Best Practice but cannot find any configuration for Results Analysis & Settlement for COS account.
    Thanks so much for your help.
    Andy

    Zeketa,
    Look this with an ABAP consultant, this is an development.
    regards.
    Bruno Araujo

  • Results Analysis Settle Internal Order (from CRM) - No cost element allowed

    In SPRO results analysis configuration to "Define Posting Rules for Settlement to Financial Accounting" I am not allowed to use an account with a cost element.  (Error: I get error KQ 119 G/L account ### cannot be created as a cost element.)
    I configure a G/L account with no cost element.  KO88 Settlement posts to G/L account fine; however, does not post to the internal order because the config mentioned on first line does not allow me to use an account with a cost element. 
    Problem: I am unable to see settlement in KOB1 report because settlement goes to GL Account, but does not post to the internal order.
    Failed solution:  I tried to use OKC9 substitution at KO88 to substitute the internal order number.  The problem is that table AUFKV is empty when the substitution runs at KO88 settlement.  I am not able to substitute the order number because the order number isn't even available in the substitution at internal order settlement.
    I put a break manual break point in program GBTACCOB at the call to the substitution rule I defined.  The breakpoint stops at the substitution when I run KO88 settlement; however, fields are blank. I am unable to do substitution.  I know this works because I have a similar substitution on the same internal order for accounting indicator when doing an MB1A goods issue to an internal order.  The break point stops there and the AUFKV data is available for substitution rule.
    Question:
    Any suggested solutions to to have internal order update into KO88 settlement after KKA1 results analysis would be helpfull.

    It is more of a reporting issue really. 
    The problem is that internal order settlement with settlement profile instead of results analysis does post the settlement to the internal order and does use a cost element.  This is the business process the users currently have.  Our users have a requirement to settle the orders weekly.  This helps them find issues earlier and speeds up the month end close.
    In the past we could use KOB1 and see the current balance of an internal order and see the settlement.  Now that report no longer shows the settlement.  How can I see what has been settled on an order and what hasn't now?

  • Result Analysis - Profit Percentage based on Revenue

    Deare Gurus,
    While executing Result Analysis, we see profit percentage on the right side as percentage onthe basis of costs. We would like to view such detail as a percentage of revenue
    eg: standard
    Revenue - 100
    Costs - 80
    Profit - 20
    Profit percentage = 20/80 = 25%
    We want it to be 20/100 = 20%.
    Please help!!!!

    Hi Babu,
    I think your example is not totally clear. From what I understand, you need to calculate a result in percentage based on the result of two other columns. What you can do is to use the first result (from the two columns) as a CKF. And then, to this CKF, use the result calcultation options of the query desinger for percentage.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Diego

  • No accounting document generated at time of result analysis settlement

    No accounting document generated at time of result analysis settlement, but controlling document and profit center document are generated. problem is cost has been settled but accounting does not generated.

    No accounting document generated at time of result analysis settlement, but controlling document and profit center document are generated. problem is cost has been settled but accounting does not generated.
    i am asking at the time of  WIP calculation or settlement
    cost can be settled but does not generated any accounting document .

  • KKAX - error 'Manual WIP/results analysis is not allowed for order

    We are running KKAX on some process orders.  A few of them get the error 'there are values for cost element 999999 that are not assigned to any line ID'; however, we do have a line id set up for the cost element, etc; when we drill down further on the message, what we end up with is 'manual wip/results analysis is not allowed'.  The business transaction for this is KABM.  I can see on the order that KABM is not a permitted business transaction. 
    We only have this problem on a few of the orders.  How is the KABM being invoked?  Is it caused by an order status?  How can I fix this?
    Thank you

    Hi Christian
    i have come up with the new business requirement
    I want to change some of the material in one of the plant into discreete.For that, I tried to delete the production version and then tried to uncheck repetitive manufacturing indictor in MRP4 view.
    But it is giving the following error
    Either you are attempting to delete production version 1000 or
    you haveattempted to deselect the repetitive manufacturing indicator for the production version.
    It is not possible to delete the production version or to
    deselect the repetitive manufacturing indicator for the following reasons:
    o Cutoff period for WIP calculation has not yet been
    established. For the period in which a goods receipt was last entered with reference to this production version.
    o The cutoff period for variance calculation has not been
    defined for the full life of the production version.
    Can you please help me out how to resolve this issue

  • Result Analysis:

    What is the difference between the Cost element data in the result analysis where we maintian the cost elements Gl accounts in RESULT analysis version with the G/l accounts or cost elements in the Line ID updating.
    We maintain both these G/l accounts where would the posting of the result analysis happen.

    Hi,
    In the Line ID you need to maintain the GL Account range and posting rules for FI you need to maitain GL Accounts for respective Valuation methods.
    S.Subbiah.

  • Result Analysis(WIP) not posted after 4 cycle run

    Hi,
    Every month value is posted in Result Analysis GL account for WIP. But we found in period 10 and period 11 value is not posted Result Analysis GL account after running 4 cycle run (Overhead calculation, WIP calculation, Variance calculation and Settlement). What may be reason ??
    Regards,
    Samrat

    Hi Christian ,
    One question related to Cut-Off period regarding WIP calculation which myself and Ajay were discussing 15 days  back..
    Is it required to change the cut-off everymonth when we calculate WIP . In my client.. then donot do that .. but still we calculate the WIP..
    Is the significance of cut-off period is to tell the system the first period to calculate WIP .. during implementation .. My client never changes that and its in a MTS ( Process Order Senario )... but calculates WIP every month.
    Regards
    Sarada

Maybe you are looking for