Results Analysis for Contracts

Dear Experts,
My Client requires to do Results Analysis for Contracts.  Please share your thoughts.
Regards,
Shareeq

Dear Ahemad,
In what would be the output of the result analysis ?I mean from sales point of view if u see then u will have to develop the report accordingly.
If you are talking abt the MM contract then there are some std reports available.
If ur talking abt the customer service point of view then we this std transaction IP51.
thanks and regards
raghav

Similar Messages

  • Result analysis for sub-items on SD-order

    Hello,
    I would like to know, whether also the document flow for subitems is being checked while executing result analysis.
    Example:
    We have got an SD order, a higher-level item and a sub-item.
    Both of them have assigned the same result analysis key. Within this key it is defined in customizing (OKG3), that the Sales Order Structure is A-"Summarize Plan and Actual Data of Subitems on Highest Item"....so the result analysis for the sub-item is being performg via the higher-level item.
    The higher-level positions is already completed - the delivery is made and also the invoice is created.
    The sub-item is not completed - neighter delivery is made nor the invoice.
    While executing the result analysis for the higher-level item, the status FNBL (final billing) is recognized and all cost are settled from WIP to CO-PA.
    As far as I know, the document flow should be checked withitn the result analysis and based on this the status should be recognized.
    Therefore It seems, that only the document flow from the higher-level item is being checked. If also the document flow from the sub-item is checked, there would be no way to get the status FNBL as the sub-item is not complete.
    Is it SAP standard delivered behaviour?
    Thanks in advance
    Peter

    Thanks Waman,
    I have tried to delete the result analysis key from the sub-item, but still the same result in result analysis...
    Could you tell my the consequences from the 1A setup from the note? It is adviced withitn the note to not use the 1A setup. But we use this and it works fine. Just some messages during the result analysis, that it could not be performed for sub-items, but this has no influence on the values.
    Regards
    Peter
    Edited by: Peter Jankech on Jun 9, 2010 8:57 AM

  • Results Analysis for Projects

    Hi Guys,
    We use Results analysis for projects and also we use RA in Product Costing.
    Can anyone let me know what exactly does this Results Analysis mean ( not in SAP terms ).
    I am trying to look for this over help.sap.com and google but could not find information on what exactly this term means.
    Also how is this related to WIP?
    Please clarify.
    Thanks,
    Srikanth.

    Dear srikusap,
    Calculation WIP through the SAP, RA key will play important role.  Work in process calculation is diferent from industry to industry. 
    In SAP RA key will shows the WIP amount while u running KKAX Transaciton Code.  After when ever u do the settlement then ti will be settled to Financial Account.  At that time A Accounting Document was generaged.  when ever the Order Status is Teco then the provious period WIP will be reversed.
    Revert back if u any calrification.
    Raj

  • How to execute Result analysis for a Single order?

    HI,
    I need to execute Result analysis for a single process order. But i found cumulative RA. Can any one provide the Individual Result analysis execution T.code?
    Thanks
    KB

    Hi,
    Use "KKAX"-->individual WIP calculation
    "KKAO"-->Collect WIP calculation
    Thanks,
    Rau

  • Results analysis for sales orders- actual costs/ revenues - (kka3-kkak)

    Hi, i have a problem when I execute the individual results analysis for sales orders (kka3) I can see actual revenues and actual costs, however when I execute the collective processing (kkak) for the results analysis I don´t see these (actual revenues and costs). Is it normal? How can I see these in the collective processing?

    Could be one of these possibilities:
    1) Controlling Area set is wrong
    2) You're input parameters are insufficient to get that sales order. Check Order Type etc you input in the main screen
    3) The master data is wrong which is not allowing the link to the Sales Order. You would have to check each field thoroughly.
    You will have to probably do a lot of checks before you resolve this. This isn't normal btw....you should see all Sales Orders
    Assign Points if useful....

  • Results Analysis for Sales Orders

    Hi
    When i am calculting Results Analysis for Sales Orders as a part of Month End Closing Activities there are some errors for few orders...
    Msg Type: E
    AppAr: KJ
    MsgNo: 216
    Message Text: Planned Cost for Valuation are 0. Please Check the Object.
    Can any one tell me what might be the error..
    Thanks in Advance..
    Sivaram

    Hi,
    The error is offen caused by one or possible more than one of following statements:
    - the delivery block of the order is set
    - the billing block is set
    - the schedule line ( confirmed quantity ) is missing
    - the position has been cancelled
    - price condition is missing
    In case no one of the mentioned options wouldn''t help, set the position status to technically completed, if the position is processed as well ( delivery, invoice, etc. ).
    We often face this kind of issue
    Good luck
    Marian

  • Result Analysis for Refurbishment order

    Hi Experts,
    Could you please explain, can we calculate result analysis for refurbishment orders, I have created the RA key wip cost element ,selected internal and service orders w/o revenue in OKG9 and  other WIP setting, I have assigned this TA key to order type in OIOF, I have created one refurb order, released and confirmed the order, now I have to do month end activity like RA calculation in KKA1 and than settlement.
    When i am trying to execute KKA1  I am getting this message " Results analysis data was not changed
    Message no. KJ240"
    Could you please advise me how I need to fix this issue.
    Appreciate if you can explain the month end process for refurbishment order in detail.
    Regards,

    Hi,
    The default settlement rule for refurbishment ordrers is FUL rule to material. This type of rules defines the business scenario where the actual costs are settled only after the order is delivered or technically completed. In such cases the most used solution to monitor costs incurred on the order is to assign a results analysis key to the order and compute the so-called work in process (WIP). WIP (if computed) is equal to the actual costs on the order and it is posted to a WIP account when settling the order before DLV or TECO. When the order is delivered or technically completed, WIP calculation reverse WIP in CO
    and the consequent settlement post this WIP cancellation to FI. Simulateously, the actual balance of the order is settled to material.
    Check your customizing in OKG9 for the RA version ; have you set flag 'transfer to FI' ?
    regards
    Waman

  • POC based Results Analysis for Service Order/ Contract

    Issue resolved. Please close the message.
    Hi Friends,
    We have a process where we create a service order and plan costs on the order.
    Later a contract will be created with billing plan. The contract is assigned to service order manually.
    After actual costs are booked to the service order the same is settled to Contract.
    When I run RA for Contract I dont see the Activity rate planned costs so the POC is not giving correct results.
    The planned material costs are being updated though.
    I have mapped the activity cost element to a line id and COS in RA configuration.
    Please let me know if I am missing anything here.
    Thanks in Advance,
    Vamsi
    Edited by: VSS on Oct 23, 2010 10:49 PM

    Hi,
    We need to implement the following OSS note:
    OSS Note 1259154.
    Also please check if 1159784
    is relevant for your system.
    Thanks,
    Vamsi

  • Results Analysis on Contract

    Fellow developers,
    When we are creating a Service Contract VA41, we are experiencing something that I cannot figure out.
    When a plant is added to the line item and I go to the item detail screen, a results analysis key populates on the account assignment tab. Can anyone tell me why or where this key is coming from?
    Thanks,
    Justin

    Dear srikusap,
    When u carry the RA  through KKAX, then u can able to see the WIP for the WBS.  That is the reason we have to run RA.
    Raj

  • Posting Rules in Results Analysis for COSR must go to different GL

    WE have "Non Valuated KMAT Sales Order Stock" scenario.
    It posts COS at time of settlement of Sales Order. Everything works fine. We have a new scenario.
    Currently both interco and external customer sales order posts to same COS GL at time of settlement.
    Interco KMAT sales orders during settlement must post to Interco COS GL.
    In OKG8 - RA Category "COSR" Key is used to post the the GL account.
    I have CoArea/CoCd/RAVersion/RACategory for COSR.
    Is it possible for system to differentiate and post to different GL, when settling IntercoSales Order vs Regular sales order

    Hi Kala,
    We had similar scenario and this what we have implemented.
    created two Result Analysis keys.one for Regular one and one for Interco
    created two usages one for interco business and one for regular one and which is populated each sales order line item.
    based on usage,RA key populated.
    If usage External : RA key "A" or If Interco "RA key "B".
    1.Assign  cost elements to respective line ids in OKG5 by RA key
    2.Assign line id to RA cost element(31) in OKG4 by RA key(create seperate 31 cost elements for both RA keys)
    3.Assign RA cost element(31) to Balance sheet and P&L accounts in OKG8 based.
    Hope this helps you.
    Thanks,
    Rau

  • Results analysis for POC method with statistical cost element

    Hi,
    We are testing ETO (engineering-to-order) scenario With valuated
    project stock and cost based POC RA method.
    Inventory is updated during external procurement and we have used
    statistical cost elements (Cost element category - 90) for inventory G/L.We want to use a
    Result analysis method which considers this statistical cost elements
    for calculating POC.For this purpose we have implemented SAP Notes
    616960, 616869 and 78420.
    In short, as per SAP note 616869, we created a customer enhancement
    project for customer enhancement 5 of the results analysis (see Note
    H78420). We copied the source code for customer enhancement 5 of the
    correction instructions of note 616869 and then implemented SAP note
    616960 to read the statistical actual costs.
    Then we included the statistical cost as actual costs - Category K in
    OKG4.
    The system is doing POC and revenue in excess of billing calculation
    correctly after taking into consideration the posted statistical cost.
    During settlement of RA (CJ88), system is not giving effect to
    inventory value. On settlement of RA, revenue should be recognized but
    at the sametime the inventory represented by statistical posting should
    be consumed(COS). The system should post a P&L posting which reduces
    the inventory (representing statistical cost) and updates the actual
    costs on settlement.
    In our example, Statistical actual
    posting is of USD 57150, planned revenue USD 100000 and POC is 70.27%.
    Revenue in excess of billing comes to USD 70265.60. Recognisation of
    revenue of USD 70265.60 is not correct as actual consumption is yet to
    happen. The correct posting in FI should be revenue of USD 70265.60
    along with COS of USD 57150.
    Please suggest why on settlement the system is not posting the COS
    along with revenue recognised?
    Thanks,
    BK

    Hi Bijay,
    We are in a similar situation in one project.  Did you get any solution to the problem you posted here? If you can share it, please.
    Regards,
    Gireesh

  • Results analysis for a project to be settled to sales order rather than PSG

    Hi Experts
    My client has two company codes.
    CC1 executes project construction for CC2. This is to be mapped as a customer project.
    As far as project settlement is concerned, since PA is not activated, it is proposed to settle to sales order item.
    In this situation, what would be effect of results analysis.
    With out PA, how the postings need to be handled with WIP, Reserves, Inventory and Revenue.
    warm regards
    ramSiva

    Hi,
    I have had this problem earlier, If PA is not abailable you have put in the settlement rule as not to be settled.
    And for the postings have to be managed using the GL accounts that we give in the result analysis configuration.  There is not much flexibility for customization here in this scenario. But you can do as much as possible using the diffrent result analysis categories.
    So for the reserves WIP inventory and revenue use result analysis category to segregate them by GL account
    Thanks
    Naveen

  • Result Analysis for TECO status - all values are 0

    Dear guru,
    I've done the configuration for Result Analysis with POC method 03, for project.
    There are 4 relevant status: PREL, REL, FNBL and TECO. TECO is mark as final RA.
    PREL, REL, FNBL are ok, but I face problem with TECO.
    In project I plan cost, plan revenue, and post actual cost through production order. There is no actual revenue.
    However, when I set the status to TECO and run Result Analysis, all the value: plan cost, plan revenue, actual cost,... are 0.
    I confuse why it is happen. Please help me.

    And another point, actual cost can be see in report, but in RA the actual cost is 0, for also other status.
    When I post actual cost through F-02, it is ok. But in this case actual cost is posted to project through confirming production order and receipt material.

  • Result analysis for Direct Postings

    Hi All,
    I have a new requirement for Result Analysis determination at service order level
    Requirement is while posting cost to service order we have two costs, one is through Activity (KP26) and another is direct posting using KB11N.
    Both have different cost elements
    615000 is for activity pricing using KP26 which posted 120 $
    195009 is for direct cost posting using KB11n which posted 150$
    Now after the actual cost is posted to service order we are doing result Analysis using KKA1, I am getting 120+150 in WIP. But requirement is system should ignore cost of direct postings using KB11N from WIP and it should calculate 120 alone  in WIP
    I hope there is no settings using DIP profile to control this, i read some help and it says using OKG4 and OKG5 this can be controlling
    I tried using OKG4 with Line id and assigning Category as N , but it is not ignoring
    Could you please guide on how to ignore direct cost entries being determined to WIP. I have a vague idea on OKG4 and OKG5
    thanks for your help
    santosh

    Hello,
    While OKG4 can achieve however please bear in mind that since you are not going to settle this cost anywhere, cost will always seat of Service order. When you try and close service order you will get error that not all cost is settled, this will further impact your month end RA / Settlement job.
    I know we can still close service order having cost but that requires setting on Settlement Profile and most of organization have SOX which does not allow them to close Cost object which has balance onto it.
    I am side tracking bit but wanted to bring this up as down steam issue.
    Thanks
    Parth

  • Display document of the results analysis for Project

    Hello expert,
    I'd like to know if a transaction exists to display the document for which I can find the number in the S_ALR_87013572 Project results report and which is linked to the displayed line items.
    Any idea?
    Regards,
    Céline O.

    Hello,
    I'm looking for a transaction to display the document which is created for the calculation of the results analysis.
    We can find the number of the document when we run the KKA2 transaction : Menu/ Resutl Analysis/ Display Line Items of result Analysis.
    That document number is also shown in the S_ALR_87013572 Project results report and I'd like to find a way to display it easily ((like FB03 for the accounting document, for example) by using the document number only.
    Céline O.

Maybe you are looking for