Results Analysis for Sales Orders

Hi
When i am calculting Results Analysis for Sales Orders as a part of Month End Closing Activities there are some errors for few orders...
Msg Type: E
AppAr: KJ
MsgNo: 216
Message Text: Planned Cost for Valuation are 0. Please Check the Object.
Can any one tell me what might be the error..
Thanks in Advance..
Sivaram

Hi,
The error is offen caused by one or possible more than one of following statements:
- the delivery block of the order is set
- the billing block is set
- the schedule line ( confirmed quantity ) is missing
- the position has been cancelled
- price condition is missing
In case no one of the mentioned options wouldn''t help, set the position status to technically completed, if the position is processed as well ( delivery, invoice, etc. ).
We often face this kind of issue
Good luck
Marian

Similar Messages

  • Results analysis for sales orders- actual costs/ revenues - (kka3-kkak)

    Hi, i have a problem when I execute the individual results analysis for sales orders (kka3) I can see actual revenues and actual costs, however when I execute the collective processing (kkak) for the results analysis I don´t see these (actual revenues and costs). Is it normal? How can I see these in the collective processing?

    Could be one of these possibilities:
    1) Controlling Area set is wrong
    2) You're input parameters are insufficient to get that sales order. Check Order Type etc you input in the main screen
    3) The master data is wrong which is not allowing the link to the Sales Order. You would have to check each field thoroughly.
    You will have to probably do a lot of checks before you resolve this. This isn't normal btw....you should see all Sales Orders
    Assign Points if useful....

  • Results Analysis on Sales Orders

    Hi Fellows,
    When i am running the results analysis for Sales orders using KKAK transaction , I do not wish to see the WIP items with 0 Values.So i selected the option " Hide Orders with 0 values in Results List ".
    However I am still getting the WIP items with 0 Value.
    I saw the help for this and it says
    " Note: In some cases individual objects may still appear in the list when both the column "Reserves for unrealized costs" (reserve for unrealized costs + reserve for complaints/commissions) and the column "Reserves for imminent loss" are a sum of multiple value fields and these value fields are checked individually for zero value ".
    From the above, I came to the conclusion that the 0 value items may still come even if we check the box.
    However from the above note, can anyone tell me where i can check the " Reserves for Unrealized Costs " and " Reserves for Imminent Loss " and also how can i know what are the value fields which are adding up to these columns.
    Also it says the Value fields are individually checked for zero value.
    Where can i see the Value fields associated with this Results Analysis and where can i see if the Value fields are assigned a value of zero.
    Please let me know if you have any thoughts on this..
    Thanks in advance..
    Srik

    Hi,
    Check whether Note 501915 - Creation, cancellation, and usage of reserves would help.
    Regards,
    P.S: Please post this question in FI/CO forum so that you can get answers quickly.

  • Results Analysis in sales order (KKA3)

    Hi experts : i have a sales order with results analysis key 00004 , but in transaction KKA3 the value of cost plannig is the same of real cost. The COSP table from where obtain cost planning value ?.
    Could you send me more information about results analysis for sales order .
    Thank's for your cooperation
    Veronica Barrientos A.
    Construmart S.A.

    Hi  Siva:
         I checked my configs ,it's right . I think if my strategy is MTS (make to stock ). maybe the reason is that  .But now my  strategy is MTO(make to order).maybe I miss other configs.

  • Plan costs calculation during results analysis of sales order

    Hi Experts,
    I am in process of implementing sales order costing. I am facing a problem during result analysis with plan costs data.
    We have a sales order for which production order is generated. Cost object is sales order.
    Say, sales order cost estimate which is the plan costs --> is $ 1000 (which includes prod order COGM of $ 600) (So remaining sales and admin costs are $ 400)
    Plan cost of production order is $ 550 (as per production order cost analysis report)
    While calculating the result analysis for sales order, system is calculating the plan costs data as $ 1000 + $ 550 = $ 1550
    As a result, I feel plan costs data during result analysis is over calculated.
    I feel either plan costs should be $ 1000 (as it already includes COGM part)
    or
    $ 950 which is (plan cost of production order $ 550 + sales and admin costs of $ 400)
    Could some one explain me why result analysis shows plan costs data as $ 1500 and if I need to rectify how can I do so.
    Thanks,
    GAN

    Any suggestions please.
    Edited by: DSK on Feb 9, 2012 6:16 AM
    Edited by: DSK on Feb 13, 2012 4:39 AM

  • Result Analysis for Refurbishment order

    Hi Experts,
    Could you please explain, can we calculate result analysis for refurbishment orders, I have created the RA key wip cost element ,selected internal and service orders w/o revenue in OKG9 and  other WIP setting, I have assigned this TA key to order type in OIOF, I have created one refurb order, released and confirmed the order, now I have to do month end activity like RA calculation in KKA1 and than settlement.
    When i am trying to execute KKA1  I am getting this message " Results analysis data was not changed
    Message no. KJ240"
    Could you please advise me how I need to fix this issue.
    Appreciate if you can explain the month end process for refurbishment order in detail.
    Regards,

    Hi,
    The default settlement rule for refurbishment ordrers is FUL rule to material. This type of rules defines the business scenario where the actual costs are settled only after the order is delivered or technically completed. In such cases the most used solution to monitor costs incurred on the order is to assign a results analysis key to the order and compute the so-called work in process (WIP). WIP (if computed) is equal to the actual costs on the order and it is posted to a WIP account when settling the order before DLV or TECO. When the order is delivered or technically completed, WIP calculation reverse WIP in CO
    and the consequent settlement post this WIP cancellation to FI. Simulateously, the actual balance of the order is settled to material.
    Check your customizing in OKG9 for the RA version ; have you set flag 'transfer to FI' ?
    regards
    Waman

  • Results Analysis on sales order

    Hi Experts,
    After results analysis run, I see several column , could some one explain what mean for them ?
    COS
    REB
    RANI
    Best Regards
    Shubin

    Hi Shubin,
    RANI-->Revenue Affecting Net Income(Calculated Revenue)
    COS-->Cost Of Sales
    REB-->Revenue Excess of Billings
    Thanks,
    Rau

  • POC based Results Analysis for Service Order/ Contract

    Issue resolved. Please close the message.
    Hi Friends,
    We have a process where we create a service order and plan costs on the order.
    Later a contract will be created with billing plan. The contract is assigned to service order manually.
    After actual costs are booked to the service order the same is settled to Contract.
    When I run RA for Contract I dont see the Activity rate planned costs so the POC is not giving correct results.
    The planned material costs are being updated though.
    I have mapped the activity cost element to a line id and COS in RA configuration.
    Please let me know if I am missing anything here.
    Thanks in Advance,
    Vamsi
    Edited by: VSS on Oct 23, 2010 10:49 PM

    Hi,
    We need to implement the following OSS note:
    OSS Note 1259154.
    Also please check if 1159784
    is relevant for your system.
    Thanks,
    Vamsi

  • RA Category for Sales Order Actual Settlement

    Hi,
    During production order settlement for WIP we run in every month end. Generally in tcode OKG8 (Posting Rule in WIP calculation and Result Analysis) we use RA category WIPR(Work In Process with Requirement to Capitalize) which is used production order settlement for WIP. We have done production order settlement and successfully value posted to WIP settlement gl account because in OKG8 WIPR is maintained against P&L and B&S account.  After that we have done Result Analysis for Sales Order through KKA3. Value has posted to various objects under Result /analysis. Now we need to run  Actual Settlement for Sales Order. In case of Sales Order Costing what should be its RA catergory for Actual Settlment : Sales Order settlment which is run through VA88.
    Best Regards,
    Samrat Roy

    Dear Waman,
    In OKG8 posting rule WIP calculation against RA category is maintained as WIPR with P&L and BS gl account. Uner Result Analysis valuation method against RA Key for Sales Order is maintained as PREL, REL, DLV, FNBL and TECO. Production order settlement has done and value has posted to WIP gl account and  Quantiy has issued for delivery and billing. After the Sale billing I have done KKA3 which is Result Analysis for Sales Order. Value has posted to Sales order wip, Actual Revenue, Actual Cost, Cost of Sale, Revenu affecting net income, Planned revenue, planned cost, Planned profit and loss value shows. After that I have run VA88 and sales order wip value has posted to wip gl accounts which is set in OKG8 both P&L and BS gl account which same gl is used for production order settlment also and I created Sales Order settlement rule which is receiver in GL accounts. That GL is external settlement GL account. That external settlment receiver gl is same as sales order settlment profile's allocation structure GL. So during final sales order settlment same gl is debited and credited of calculated profit.
    But I have some doubts which I requires as per business. I need Revenue Surplus(POCS), Reserve Unrealized Cost(RUCR), Revenue in Excess Billing(POCI) and variance from Result Analysis(VARR). I wanted to set this RA category in OKG8 but system does not allow me which says alrady WIPR is maintaied and value posted to result analysis. So I need to deactivate first then new RA key can be introduced..
    Also I would ask you after production order settlement for wip, shall I run wip for Sales order and Sales Order settlement. or I need to to pas customer delivery and final billing. After billing I need to run WIP on sales order and sales order settlement. Basically I will run two times WIP which are production order and sales order. Our business sceanrio consists of one sales order with 29 prouction and its corresponding 29 wip which will be finally settled to Sales order external settlment gl account.
    Best Regards,
    Samrat roy

  • Change of partner analyse in sales orders

    Hello,
    I changed the partner analyse for sales orders and added a new mandatory partnerrole.
    In new documents the partner analyse works fine, but in the existed sales documents I cant´t see, that a mandotory role is missing.
    How can I see that this role is missing in the exsting documents???
    Thanks for info
    Nicole

    You can create a custom report but there is no standard way to do this.
    When a document is created in SAP, it is a "snapshot" of that configuration, master data, and information as it exists when the document is created.  On the SD side there are a few things you can influence, for example, SAP contains some standard tools for mass updating of pricing information.  Most of the document exists in its unchanged state though. 
    You *may* be able to use VA05 and do this (although I doubt it, no system in front of me right now).  Other than that transaction or a custom report there really aren't a lot of options.
    If you are familiar enough with the tables, you can do a "quick view" or an ABAP Query to get the info.  However the SAP partner table is recursive so to avoid getting lots and lots of duplicates you will either have to add some code to a full query, or do offline manipulation of the data.
    If you're looking for soild SAP experience to help through some of these hurdles, please contact me.
    Bill Wood - President
    R3Now Consulting
    http://www.r3now.com SAP thought leadership!
    Platinum SAP Solutions
    (704) 905 - 5175
    http://www.linkedin.com/in/billwood

  • Result analysis for sub-items on SD-order

    Hello,
    I would like to know, whether also the document flow for subitems is being checked while executing result analysis.
    Example:
    We have got an SD order, a higher-level item and a sub-item.
    Both of them have assigned the same result analysis key. Within this key it is defined in customizing (OKG3), that the Sales Order Structure is A-"Summarize Plan and Actual Data of Subitems on Highest Item"....so the result analysis for the sub-item is being performg via the higher-level item.
    The higher-level positions is already completed - the delivery is made and also the invoice is created.
    The sub-item is not completed - neighter delivery is made nor the invoice.
    While executing the result analysis for the higher-level item, the status FNBL (final billing) is recognized and all cost are settled from WIP to CO-PA.
    As far as I know, the document flow should be checked withitn the result analysis and based on this the status should be recognized.
    Therefore It seems, that only the document flow from the higher-level item is being checked. If also the document flow from the sub-item is checked, there would be no way to get the status FNBL as the sub-item is not complete.
    Is it SAP standard delivered behaviour?
    Thanks in advance
    Peter

    Thanks Waman,
    I have tried to delete the result analysis key from the sub-item, but still the same result in result analysis...
    Could you tell my the consequences from the 1A setup from the note? It is adviced withitn the note to not use the 1A setup. But we use this and it works fine. Just some messages during the result analysis, that it could not be performed for sub-items, but this has no influence on the values.
    Regards
    Peter
    Edited by: Peter Jankech on Jun 9, 2010 8:57 AM

  • Query for Sales Order Analysis

    Dear Experts
    I have written a Query for Sales Order Analysis and would like to have help on this.
    The query is used for generating daily report for Sales Order on number of documents (Sales Order), total amount of sales orders and total GP of Sales Order. The query is written as below:
    SELECT T0.[DocNum], SUM(T0.DocTotal) AS 'Total', SUM(T0.U_Total_GP) AS 'Total GP'
    FROM ORDR T0 WHERE T0.[DocDate] =[%0] GROUP BY T0.[DocNum] ORDER BY T0.[DocNum]
    where U_Total_GP is a UDF for storing the GP of each order.
    After executing the query, a selection criteria of date appears and after a date is selected, the report shown information required. However, the query does not calculate column total for total amount and total GP. Although I know the total for each column can be displayed by pressing "Ctrl" + Click on the column title, it would have to be done from time to time.
    Therefore, I would like to modify my query in order to calculate the column totals when executed. Are there any suggestions for this?
    Thank you
    Regards
    Elton

    Hi Elton,
    Try this:
    SELECT T0.[DocNum], SUM(T0.DocTotal) AS 'Total', SUM(T0.U_Total_GP) AS 'Total GP'
    FROM ORDR T0 WHERE T0.[DocDate] =[%0] GROUP BY T0.[DocNum]
    Union ALL
    SELECT '', SUM(T0.DocTotal) AS 'Total', SUM(T0.U_Total_GP) AS 'Total GP'
    FROM ORDR T0 WHERE T0.[DocDate] =[%0]
    ORDER BY T0.[DocNum]
    Thanks,
    Gordon

  • How to execute Result analysis for a Single order?

    HI,
    I need to execute Result analysis for a single process order. But i found cumulative RA. Can any one provide the Individual Result analysis execution T.code?
    Thanks
    KB

    Hi,
    Use "KKAX"-->individual WIP calculation
    "KKAO"-->Collect WIP calculation
    Thanks,
    Rau

  • Impact Analysis: Business Area, Profit Center changed for Sales Order type

    Hi All,
    Can you please let me know the impact of changing the Business Area and Profit Center for Sales Order Document types.
    Scenario:
    Let's say that sales document type ZOR has been used for sometime. On this document x number of sales orders have been raised, delivered and invoiced over the years.
    Now, if you change the Business Area and Profit Center what would be the business impact.
    thanks,

    Hi,
    First of all itu2019s not a good business practice to change the Business area and Profit Centre.
    However if at all l you change the Business area and Profit centre the following is the impact::
    Business Area: effects the sales order in accounts assignment at Header level.
    Profit centre: effects the accounting part at Item level
    Overall in MIS reporting w.r.t Profit and Business Analysis in Finance will be affected.
    Thanks and regards
    DSR

  • Copy 0CO_OM_WBS_5 to get variances for Sale Order / Item

    Hi ,
    I copied the existing 0CO_OM_WBS_5 extractor and modified it with a logic to bring the Result Analysis numbers for Sales Orders. But when trying to create a normal generic datasource with the FM  it is not allowing and giving me an error "E_T_DATA is not present in the the Function Module " The same is not available in standard datasource FM as well for 0CO_OM_WBS_5  .Do we need to maintain any table for mapping the datasource with FM and Extract Structure specific to the CO-OM Extractors.
    Help will be greatly appreciated.
    Regards,
    VSK

    Thanks.

Maybe you are looking for