Results Analysis on Sales Orders

Hi Fellows,
When i am running the results analysis for Sales orders using KKAK transaction , I do not wish to see the WIP items with 0 Values.So i selected the option " Hide Orders with 0 values in Results List ".
However I am still getting the WIP items with 0 Value.
I saw the help for this and it says
" Note: In some cases individual objects may still appear in the list when both the column "Reserves for unrealized costs" (reserve for unrealized costs + reserve for complaints/commissions) and the column "Reserves for imminent loss" are a sum of multiple value fields and these value fields are checked individually for zero value ".
From the above, I came to the conclusion that the 0 value items may still come even if we check the box.
However from the above note, can anyone tell me where i can check the " Reserves for Unrealized Costs " and " Reserves for Imminent Loss " and also how can i know what are the value fields which are adding up to these columns.
Also it says the Value fields are individually checked for zero value.
Where can i see the Value fields associated with this Results Analysis and where can i see if the Value fields are assigned a value of zero.
Please let me know if you have any thoughts on this..
Thanks in advance..
Srik

Hi,
Check whether Note 501915 - Creation, cancellation, and usage of reserves would help.
Regards,
P.S: Please post this question in FI/CO forum so that you can get answers quickly.

Similar Messages

Results Analysis in sales order (KKA3)

Hi experts : i have a sales order with results analysis key 00004 , but in transaction KKA3 the value of cost plannig is the same of real cost. The COSP table from where obtain cost planning value ?.
Could you send me more information about results analysis for sales order .
Thank's for your cooperation
Veronica Barrientos A.
Construmart S.A.

Hi Siva:
I checked my configs ,it's right . I think if my strategy is MTS (make to stock ). maybe the reason is that .But now my strategy is MTO(make to order).maybe I miss other configs.

Results analysis for sales orders- actual costs/ revenues - (kka3-kkak)

Hi, i have a problem when I execute the individual results analysis for sales orders (kka3) I can see actual revenues and actual costs, however when I execute the collective processing (kkak) for the results analysis I don´t see these (actual revenues and costs). Is it normal? How can I see these in the collective processing?

Could be one of these possibilities:
1) Controlling Area set is wrong
2) You're input parameters are insufficient to get that sales order. Check Order Type etc you input in the main screen
3) The master data is wrong which is not allowing the link to the Sales Order. You would have to check each field thoroughly.
You will have to probably do a lot of checks before you resolve this. This isn't normal btw....you should see all Sales Orders
Assign Points if useful....

Results Analysis for Sales Orders

Hi
When i am calculting Results Analysis for Sales Orders as a part of Month End Closing Activities there are some errors for few orders...
Msg Type: E
AppAr: KJ
MsgNo: 216
Message Text: Planned Cost for Valuation are 0. Please Check the Object.
Can any one tell me what might be the error..
Thanks in Advance..
Sivaram

Hi,
The error is offen caused by one or possible more than one of following statements:
- the delivery block of the order is set
- the billing block is set
- the schedule line ( confirmed quantity ) is missing
- the position has been cancelled
- price condition is missing
In case no one of the mentioned options wouldn''t help, set the position status to technically completed, if the position is processed as well ( delivery, invoice, etc. ).
We often face this kind of issue
Good luck
Marian

Plan costs calculation during results analysis of sales order

Hi Experts,
I am in process of implementing sales order costing. I am facing a problem during result analysis with plan costs data.
We have a sales order for which production order is generated. Cost object is sales order.
Say, sales order cost estimate which is the plan costs --> is $ 1000 (which includes prod order COGM of $ 600) (So remaining sales and admin costs are $ 400)
Plan cost of production order is $ 550 (as per production order cost analysis report)
While calculating the result analysis for sales order, system is calculating the plan costs data as $ 1000 + $ 550 = $ 1550
As a result, I feel plan costs data during result analysis is over calculated.
I feel either plan costs should be $ 1000 (as it already includes COGM part)
or
$ 950 which is (plan cost of production order $ 550 + sales and admin costs of $ 400)
Could some one explain me why result analysis shows plan costs data as $ 1500 and if I need to rectify how can I do so.
Thanks,
GAN

Any suggestions please.
Edited by: DSK on Feb 9, 2012 6:16 AM
Edited by: DSK on Feb 13, 2012 4:39 AM

Results Analysis on sales order

Hi Experts,
After results analysis run, I see several column , could some one explain what mean for them ?
COS
REB
RANI
Best Regards
Shubin

Hi Shubin,
RANI-->Revenue Affecting Net Income(Calculated Revenue)
COS-->Cost Of Sales
REB-->Revenue Excess of Billings
Thanks,
Rau

Cost Analysis by Sale Order

Hello,
I'm seeking to enable in BI a Cost Analysis Scenario with repect to the Sales Orders. That is, something similar to the analysis you can easily perform in the R/3 area Accounting -> Controlling -> Product Cost Controlling -> Product Cost by Sales Order.
For instance in standard report KKBC_KUN, you can choose a sales order number and get all the cost elements related to that sales order, with the corresponding costs.
I have examined the following objects provided by the BW's Business Content:
- InfoCube 0PC_C01: it contains only the costs related to production orders, and not the costs associated with sales orders.
- InfoSource 0CO_OM_CCA_9: it seems interesting, in fact it delivers some header and line item data of the Controlling Object Document. Unfortunately it doesn't deliver the crucial characteristics Controlling Object and Controlling Object Type, which I definitly need for enabling my analysis scenario!!
(By the way, are these 2 characteristics delivered by the BC? There exists a 0COSTOBJ characteristic, but it's not used by any object in the flow afterwards. Moreover, I can't find a standard DataSource in R/3 which I can use to load either its attributes or its texts, and see what data enter it..)
Business Content for Product Cost by Sales Order), but none could help me.
It seems really weird that it's not possible to carry out a Cost Analysis by Sales Order in BW, so if anyone has some suggestion it'll be very appreciated indeed.
Thanks & Regards, Davide

I eventually found the following SAP Note. No BCT for this analysis scenario....
Note 584791 - BW-BCT-CO: Costs not extracted on sales orders
Symptom
In R/3, costs are posted directly to sales orders. The costs have to be analyzed in the BW system. In the standard system, however, this data is not extracted into the BW system.
Other terms
0CO_OM_OPA_1; 0CO_OM_OPA_6
Solution
1. There are currently no DataSources for costs on sales orders in the standard BW Business Content. Unfortunately, there are currently no resources scheduled for a new development in this area either.
2. Therefore, the DataSources and the Business Content must be created in the customer project within the framework of consulting as a customer solution concerning the generic extraction options of the BW Service APIs or function modules you have programmed yourself for extracting data.
3. Technical background information about costs on sales orders:
The transaction data is available in the following R/3 tables
COSS and COSP - Totals records or COEP - Line items.
This concerns records for the VB* object numbers.
The master data of the sales orders is contained in the VBAK and VBAP tables.
The 0CO_OM_OPA_1 and 0CO_OM_OPA_6 DataSources only extract costs for orders with master data in the AUFK table. These types of requests always have OR* object numbers. Therefore, these DataSources cannot be used for sales orders.
However, you may be able to assign requests from the AUFK table (for example, maintenance orders or production orders) to a sales order through the AUFK-KDAUF table field.

Change of partner analyse in sales orders

Hello,
I changed the partner analyse for sales orders and added a new mandatory partnerrole.
In new documents the partner analyse works fine, but in the existed sales documents I cant´t see, that a mandotory role is missing.
How can I see that this role is missing in the exsting documents???
Thanks for info
Nicole

You can create a custom report but there is no standard way to do this.
When a document is created in SAP, it is a "snapshot" of that configuration, master data, and information as it exists when the document is created. On the SD side there are a few things you can influence, for example, SAP contains some standard tools for mass updating of pricing information. Most of the document exists in its unchanged state though.
You *may* be able to use VA05 and do this (although I doubt it, no system in front of me right now). Other than that transaction or a custom report there really aren't a lot of options.
If you are familiar enough with the tables, you can do a "quick view" or an ABAP Query to get the info. However the SAP partner table is recursive so to avoid getting lots and lots of duplicates you will either have to add some code to a full query, or do offline manipulation of the data.
If you're looking for soild SAP experience to help through some of these hurdles, please contact me.
Bill Wood - President
R3Now Consulting
http://www.r3now.com SAP thought leadership!
Platinum SAP Solutions
(704) 905 - 5175
http://www.linkedin.com/in/billwood

Account determination analysis in sales order

Hi there,
in a sales order processing (VA02/VA03) I'd like to know which accounts will be determined prior to invoincing it.
I find the "account determination analysis" tool through the menù path: "Environment" -> "Analysis" -> "Account Determination" (FCODE = 'KTPR'), but it shows an empty screen
The same tool shows the desired data during an invoice processing (VF02/VF03).
How can do to see the account determination analysis in sales order processing, and not in invoice processing ?
This tool shows an empty screen even if the order is invoiced, or not.
So I'm asking: which is the meaning of this tool inside sales order processing ?
Hope I've explained correctly my problem.
Thanks in advance.
Andrea

Hi Nagaraj,
the sales order amount is > 0, but the account determination analysis tool still show me an empty screen
It seems this tool runs only into invoice processing.
I try to follow the ABAP debugger and at a certain point it uses the "account determination procedure" (KOFI00), that in the sales order is missing ... maybe this is the problem ...
Best regards
Andrea

Analysis of Sales order

To analyse the sale order we are using the TCode KKBC_KUN. I observed there are three columns in that report plan costs, actual costs and variance.
From where thse plan costs are picking by the system in this report. Actually my problem is there is commission on sales.. it is only visible in the actual costs column only... it is not visible in plan column costs. ...
Can any one help me in this issue... where i can check plan costs???
Thanks
Radha

Hiya,
If you are looking for tables, I believe the cost is picked up from table COSP.
However, you can perform a Sales Order Costing by going into the Sales Order and then Extras --> Costing. You need to setup the appropriate Costing Variants for this.
Not sure if this helps, so write back if you need more info.
Cheers.

Result Analysis for Refurbishment order

Hi Experts,
Could you please explain, can we calculate result analysis for refurbishment orders, I have created the RA key wip cost element ,selected internal and service orders w/o revenue in OKG9 and other WIP setting, I have assigned this TA key to order type in OIOF, I have created one refurb order, released and confirmed the order, now I have to do month end activity like RA calculation in KKA1 and than settlement.
When i am trying to execute KKA1 I am getting this message " Results analysis data was not changed
Message no. KJ240"
Could you please advise me how I need to fix this issue.
Appreciate if you can explain the month end process for refurbishment order in detail.
Regards,

Hi,
The default settlement rule for refurbishment ordrers is FUL rule to material. This type of rules defines the business scenario where the actual costs are settled only after the order is delivered or technically completed. In such cases the most used solution to monitor costs incurred on the order is to assign a results analysis key to the order and compute the so-called work in process (WIP). WIP (if computed) is equal to the actual costs on the order and it is posted to a WIP account when settling the order before DLV or TECO. When the order is delivered or technically completed, WIP calculation reverse WIP in CO
and the consequent settlement post this WIP cancellation to FI. Simulateously, the actual balance of the order is settled to material.
Check your customizing in OKG9 for the RA version ; have you set flag 'transfer to FI' ?
regards
Waman

Account determinatin analysis in Sales Order

Dear Team,
Created 2 sales orders,
for one sales order - KOFI00 Account determination folder is visible when you check in environment - analysis - account determination, but for other sales order - KOFI00 is not there. Tried to check the difference in both orders: Same sales area and customer but different materials and plants. Let me know any other possibility to get account determination KOFI00 done for other order too.
Please do the needful.

Hi,
Checked the material account assignment group for both sales orders - field is maintained as NIL. Even then for one Sales order, KOFI00 is determined at Sales order level, but for other not. Also the resp billing type which is in the sales orders are correctly assigned to KOFI00.
Please provide your valuable inputs where I am missing. Thanks in advance.

Results Analysis Settle Internal Order (from CRM) - No cost element allowed

In SPRO results analysis configuration to "Define Posting Rules for Settlement to Financial Accounting" I am not allowed to use an account with a cost element. (Error: I get error KQ 119 G/L account ### cannot be created as a cost element.)
I configure a G/L account with no cost element. KO88 Settlement posts to G/L account fine; however, does not post to the internal order because the config mentioned on first line does not allow me to use an account with a cost element.
Problem: I am unable to see settlement in KOB1 report because settlement goes to GL Account, but does not post to the internal order.
Failed solution: I tried to use OKC9 substitution at KO88 to substitute the internal order number. The problem is that table AUFKV is empty when the substitution runs at KO88 settlement. I am not able to substitute the order number because the order number isn't even available in the substitution at internal order settlement.
I put a break manual break point in program GBTACCOB at the call to the substitution rule I defined. The breakpoint stops at the substitution when I run KO88 settlement; however, fields are blank. I am unable to do substitution. I know this works because I have a similar substitution on the same internal order for accounting indicator when doing an MB1A goods issue to an internal order. The break point stops there and the AUFKV data is available for substitution rule.
Question:
Any suggested solutions to to have internal order update into KO88 settlement after KKA1 results analysis would be helpfull.

It is more of a reporting issue really.
The problem is that internal order settlement with settlement profile instead of results analysis does post the settlement to the internal order and does use a cost element. This is the business process the users currently have. Our users have a requirement to settle the orders weekly. This helps them find issues earlier and speeds up the month end close.
In the past we could use KOB1 and see the current balance of an internal order and see the settlement. Now that report no longer shows the settlement. How can I see what has been settled on an order and what hasn't now?

GATP (APO) Check results in ERP Sales order.

Hi Gurus,
We have a requirement to get GATP results (Product Substitution) into ERP Sales order. Please note this is not CRM Sales Order we are dealing with. We are not able to populate product substitution into schedule line.
According to SAP, GATP/ATP happens automatically unlike CRM sales order which has a "ATP check" button. Standard SAP functionality for ERP SLO doesn't have "ATP" button.
My question is, when the automatic check happens in the background, will the ERP sales order populate the "product substitution" results ( assuming that product substitution is set up in APO) from APO into ERP SLO in the schedule line?
Do we need to integrate APO with CRM for ERP sales order?
For example if the order has requested quantity of 100 and only 60 is available, will APO-ATP/GATP (which happens automatically according to SAP in ERP SLO) populate rest of the 40 with product substitution into the schedule lines
Please advice if any of you guys faced similar issue or have implemented ERP Sales order with GATP check.
Thanks
Shree

Does anyone have an answer to this question. We have the same requirement regarding GATP with ERP Sales Orders in CRM.
Thanks,
Ron

Projects KKA2_ Results Analysis (Int. Orders/Projects)

Hi,
I have put the results analysis key under the control tab of a WBS element. When doint the KKA2 I am receiving the follwoing message.
I want to post WIP and have done all account settings. could anybody explain the process for this periodic processing of projects how to identify WIP.
I have posted via KB15 costs on this project and now I would expect the a WIP would be identified at this amount???
Thanks Ulrike
No entered status set. No results analysis will be performed
Message no. KJ210
Diagnosis
The valuation of the order or project in results analysis depends on the
    status of the object.
In this case, the object does not have an active status entered in the
    valuation methods in Customizing for WIP calculation and results
    analysis. Consequently, WIP calculation and results analysis cannot find
    a method with which the object can be processed.
Procedure
Decide whether the object should be processed in its current state
    (indicated by its active status in status management) by WIP calculation
    and results analysis.

RA is specific to the period you run for... this is standard behaviour.
Regards

Results Analysis on Sales Orders

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for