Results Analysis on WIP

Hi Guys,
Do we carry out the Results Analysis to know the cost of the WIP at a particular point of time?
What information does this Results Analysis yield and how do we use this information. Do we calculate the cost of WIP?
And where do we settle these costs?
Pls let me know about this concept of WIP and RA ??
Thanks
Kris..

Hello Srikusap,
WIP means work in progress suppose the production order is made up of 10 qty but at the time of confirmation of order only 8 qty is confirmed for production out of which 6 qty is confirmed as finished nad 2 qty is still on production line to be completed , at the month end if this two qty is not decleared as finished then it will be considered under wip(work in process)
RA is resault analysis in which the WIP is calculated.
Hope this can help .
Thnx

Similar Messages

CO-PA: Result analysis process

Hi COPA Guru,
1) Will Result analysis post WIP for FI posting or it only calculate the figure?
2) Is it Result analysis always necessary before settlement?
Thanks,
Kick

Hi,
At period-end, you can calculate WIP using Individual or Collective settlement.
The following activities relating to WIP nneds to be done at period-end:
1) Allocation of Overheads to Production/Process Orders at planned rates
2) Actual Price calculation (T-Code - KSII)
3) Revaluation of Production/Process Orders (T-Code -CON2)
4) Change Cut-off period for WIP (KKA0)
This is required to prevent the system overwriting the WIP calculations already posted till the previous period.
5) WIP Calculation (KKAX/KKAO)
This only calculates the WIP but does not post to FI.
The system calculates WIP based on the status of the Production/Process Orders. WIP is calculated on all Prod/Process Orders which do not have status DLV (Delivered) or TECO(Technically complete)
6) Variance calculation (KKS1/KKS2)
The system calculates Variances based on the status of the Production/Process Orders. Variances are calculated on all Prod/Process Orders which have status DLV (Delivered) or TECO(Technically complete)
7) Settlement of Production/Process orders (CO88/KO88)
The system posts the WIP & the Variances calculated in 5 & 6 above.
Once the status of the Orders change to DLV or TECO, system will reverse the WIP postings made in previous periods.
To answer your specific questions:
Result Analysis is the WIP calculation (KKAX/KKAO), which only calculates the WIP but does not post to FI.
Result analysis is always necessary before settlement.
Regards,
Assign points if useful.

KKAX - error 'Manual WIP/results analysis is not allowed for order

We are running KKAX on some process orders. A few of them get the error 'there are values for cost element 999999 that are not assigned to any line ID'; however, we do have a line id set up for the cost element, etc; when we drill down further on the message, what we end up with is 'manual wip/results analysis is not allowed'. The business transaction for this is KABM. I can see on the order that KABM is not a permitted business transaction.
We only have this problem on a few of the orders. How is the KABM being invoked? Is it caused by an order status? How can I fix this?
Thank you

Hi Christian
i have come up with the new business requirement
I want to change some of the material in one of the plant into discreete.For that, I tried to delete the production version and then tried to uncheck repetitive manufacturing indictor in MRP4 view.
But it is giving the following error
Either you are attempting to delete production version 1000 or
you haveattempted to deselect the repetitive manufacturing indicator for the production version.
It is not possible to delete the production version or to
deselect the repetitive manufacturing indicator for the following reasons:
o Cutoff period for WIP calculation has not yet been
established. For the period in which a goods receipt was last entered with reference to this production version.
o The cutoff period for variance calculation has not been
defined for the full life of the production version.
Can you please help me out how to resolve this issue

Result Analysis(WIP) not posted after 4 cycle run

Hi,
Every month value is posted in Result Analysis GL account for WIP. But we found in period 10 and period 11 value is not posted Result Analysis GL account after running 4 cycle run (Overhead calculation, WIP calculation, Variance calculation and Settlement). What may be reason ??
Regards,
Samrat

Hi Christian ,
One question related to Cut-Off period regarding WIP calculation which myself and Ajay were discussing 15 days back..
Is it required to change the cut-off everymonth when we calculate WIP . In my client.. then donot do that .. but still we calculate the WIP..
Is the significance of cut-off period is to tell the system the first period to calculate WIP .. during implementation .. My client never changes that and its in a MTS ( Process Order Senario )... but calculates WIP every month.
Regards
Sarada

How to configure Reserves Settings in WIP-Result Analysis Key

Hi,
I need to Capitalize the un-realized revenues/Cost?. I came to know that it can be fixed by doing configuration in Result Analysis Key. What are the settings that i need to do in WIP configuraion (Product Costing). Kindy help me or provide me some inputs to full fill this requirement.
Thanks
Kishore

Use Tcode OKG5 - Assign the required Cost elemnets to a Line ID, under "Req To Cap" coloum.

WIP according local GAAP vs IFRS - only one result analysis key

Dear experts,
I am faced with the following issue. We use WBS-elements for long running activities. We set result analysis key on WBS-element for periodic WIP calculation. The actual result analysis key is set up according local GAAP.
Now we want to implement parallel accounting according IFRS. Here we can use percentage of completion for valuation of our project(s).
How can we handle two methods of WIP calculation? We can only set one resulat analysis key on WBS element?
How do you handle this issue.
Thanks for your reply in advance
Regards,
Butch

Thanks for the quick feedback.
Maybe some additional information:
01 - IFRS (real time link with FI)
02 parallell currency deprec area
20 - LOCAL GAAP
50 - Grants IFRS value (investment measure support area) linked realtime to FI
51 parallel currency deprec area of 50
60 - Grants Local GAAP
I already checked the SAP library and the SDN forum, but could not find anywhere how to set up the depreciation area(Grants LOCAL GAAP) to which the investment measure is not directly linked to (not the support area (50) in Tr ANVEST).
Is it possible with only one investement key to fill the IFRS (50) & Local GAAP (60) value investment depreciation area and still depreciate them in different ways?
Thanks again!
Kr,
Roeland

Result analysis for sub-items on SD-order

Hello,
I would like to know, whether also the document flow for subitems is being checked while executing result analysis.
Example:
We have got an SD order, a higher-level item and a sub-item.
Both of them have assigned the same result analysis key. Within this key it is defined in customizing (OKG3), that the Sales Order Structure is A-"Summarize Plan and Actual Data of Subitems on Highest Item"....so the result analysis for the sub-item is being performg via the higher-level item.
The higher-level positions is already completed - the delivery is made and also the invoice is created.
The sub-item is not completed - neighter delivery is made nor the invoice.
While executing the result analysis for the higher-level item, the status FNBL (final billing) is recognized and all cost are settled from WIP to CO-PA.
As far as I know, the document flow should be checked withitn the result analysis and based on this the status should be recognized.
Therefore It seems, that only the document flow from the higher-level item is being checked. If also the document flow from the sub-item is checked, there would be no way to get the status FNBL as the sub-item is not complete.
Is it SAP standard delivered behaviour?
Thanks in advance
Peter

Thanks Waman,
I have tried to delete the result analysis key from the sub-item, but still the same result in result analysis...
Could you tell my the consequences from the 1A setup from the note? It is adviced withitn the note to not use the 1A setup. But we use this and it works fine. Just some messages during the result analysis, that it could not be performed for sub-items, but this has no influence on the values.
Regards
Peter
Edited by: Peter Jankech on Jun 9, 2010 8:57 AM

Problem with Result Analysis report (KKAK)

Hello Experts,
I am facing problem with T-code KKAK, when I am executing this transaction (Results Analysis (RA) on sales orders creates the data for posting to the GL, depending on the sales order (i.e. WIP or COS) ) system is displaying/calculating for all sales order which are already completed (fully shipped and billed), this report displaying in 300 to 400 pages.
My requirement is .. is it possible to display only sales orders which are no completed. This will help alot.
Please help me to solve this problem.
Thanks
Sudheer

Hi,
in the selection screen of KKAK in "Output options" there is a flag "display closed items".
Uncheck this and ensure that all completely processed orders have status closed (CLSD).
Thus they will not be reported anymore.
BR Christian

Results Analysis on Sales Orders

Hi Fellows,
When i am running the results analysis for Sales orders using KKAK transaction , I do not wish to see the WIP items with 0 Values.So i selected the option " Hide Orders with 0 values in Results List ".
However I am still getting the WIP items with 0 Value.
I saw the help for this and it says
" Note: In some cases individual objects may still appear in the list when both the column "Reserves for unrealized costs" (reserve for unrealized costs + reserve for complaints/commissions) and the column "Reserves for imminent loss" are a sum of multiple value fields and these value fields are checked individually for zero value ".
From the above, I came to the conclusion that the 0 value items may still come even if we check the box.
However from the above note, can anyone tell me where i can check the " Reserves for Unrealized Costs " and " Reserves for Imminent Loss " and also how can i know what are the value fields which are adding up to these columns.
Also it says the Value fields are individually checked for zero value.
Where can i see the Value fields associated with this Results Analysis and where can i see if the Value fields are assigned a value of zero.
Please let me know if you have any thoughts on this..
Thanks in advance..
Srik

Hi,
Check whether Note 501915 - Creation, cancellation, and usage of reserves would help.
Regards,
P.S: Please post this question in FI/CO forum so that you can get answers quickly.

Post Cost of Sales in PS after Result Analysis

Hi SAP experts,
I'm testing SAP EC&O best practice solution at this moment.
I executed KKAJ (results analysis) and both Cost of Sales and WIP were calculated correctly.
COS: for a TECO WBS, which already have billing document
WIP: for other WBS which is still in progress.
I already saved this results analysis, however, when I execute settlement (CJ8G), I can only find the posting to FI of WIP. (Dr GL WIP account/Cr P&L WIP account). My expect is to have COS posted to FI as well (to recognize COS for the billing of completed WBS above).
Kindly help me to figure out what I was missing here? I don't know at what step COS will be posted to FI. I searched all configuration document in Best Practice but cannot find any configuration for Results Analysis & Settlement for COS account.
Thanks so much for your help.
Andy

Zeketa,
Look this with an ABAP consultant, this is an development.
regards.
Bruno Araujo

No accounting document generated at time of result analysis settlement

No accounting document generated at time of result analysis settlement, but controlling document and profit center document are generated. problem is cost has been settled but accounting does not generated.

No accounting document generated at time of result analysis settlement, but controlling document and profit center document are generated. problem is cost has been settled but accounting does not generated.
i am asking at the time of WIP calculation or settlement
cost can be settled but does not generated any accounting document .

Differance amoung the Valuation Methods for Result Analysis

Dear All,
In SAP Product Cost Controlling ther are 3 types of Cosings
1. Production Cost by Order
Path:- Production Cost by Order ---> Period end Closing ->WIP->Defind Valuation Method for( Actual Cost)
2. Production Cost By Period
Path:- Production Cost by Period ---> Period end Closing ->WIP->Defind Valuation Method for ( Target Cost )
3. Production Cost by Sales Order
Path :- Production Cost by Sales Order ---> Period end Closing --->Defind Valuation Method for Result Analysis.
Note: Here the point is Valuation Methods ( 1 to 17 ) availabel in Production Cost by Sales Order only. The Valution Method is very important to Calculate WIP. Different Countries follows different methods, but in the By Order and By Period we can get these Valuation Methods. What would be the reasno behind this.
Regards

Dear All,
Any one have any ieda

Result Analysis Settlement - Posting to FI

Hi all
I am configuring Result analysis related configuration to post WIP values to FI on period basis. I did following nodes configuration
1. Create Result Analysis Keys
2. Define Result Analysis Versions
3. Define Valuation Methods for Result Analysis
4. Define LIne ID
5. Define Assignment for Result Analysis
6. Define update for Result Analsysis
7. Define posting rules for Settlement to Finanacial Accounting
We have RA connection with Projects
After making all above configurations when we are performing KKA2 and CJ88, NO FI documents are getting posted and we are repeatedly getting message as there is no "Accrual" values.
We even not getting WIP values at KKA2, though we have eligble values at Project.
we need to fix that at high priority...
your inputs are highly appreciated..
Kindly let me know, if any further clarifications required on this.
best regards,
S. Habib Pasha.

Hi ,
Based up on the above discussion did you executed any standard cost and revenue reports against the relevant WBS elements and verified that costs and revenue are flowing properly to the project ?
In the RA are you able to see the WIP Values,Planned values and Actual values for COST and REVENUE ?
And what are the parameters you maintained in Settelement Profile ?
Thanks,
Sai.

Results Analysis Message KJ436

While setting up Results Analysis for the POC method (03) and executing transaction KKA2, we got the following message. Both the CO version and the RA version are set to the same valuation (Group valuation). Any help would be appriciated.
Basic RA version must have valuation category "0" (operational valuation)
Message no. KJ436
Diagnosis
If a version has actual data (see basic version setting), it must be relevant to settlement in results analysis (see maintenance of version of results analysis).
If a version does not have actual data (see basic version setting), it cannot be relevant to settlement in results analysis (see maintenance of the version of results analysis).
Procedure
1. Check the basic version setting in the maintenance of the general versions.
2. Modify the results analysis version to conform to the basic version setting.
3. Turn the indicator Version relevant to settlement on or off, whichever is appropriate.We are using CO plan version 0 (see below) and it is set for actual and plan. The RA version (0) (also below) is marked as being relevant to settlement. These settings seems to address the error message but I guess we are missing something.

Hai Mikhail
As u mentioned u set the RA method for POC3 in OKG3.
Assuming maintained in OKG3 - the status control ,profit Basis,Valuation Level and its Minimum Values.
Is the RA version been maintained in OKG2 ?
In OKG2 - need to maintain the RA version with respect to the Controlling Area like 0 or 1.
Is OKG8 has been maintained on the Posting Rules - means where the RA version should have the corrsponding Profit & loss account number and Balance sheet account number.
Kindly check and verify according to the relevant RA used/picked using OKG1 in Config - OKG2(maintain RA versions), OKG3(valuation methods for RA), Define Line ID's , OKG5 ( Assignment of Cost elements for WIP and RA) , OKG4( update of WIP calculation and RA) , OKG8 ( Posting rules in WIP and RA) .
If all these maintained u will definetelu get the KKA2 result.
ENJOY SAP PS
Regards
PP

No entered status set. No results analysis will be performed

Hi Guys,
I keep on getting this error message beloe and the valuation is on RELEASE status
No entered status set. No results analysis will be performed
Message no. KJ210
Diagnosis
The valuation of the order or project in results analysis depends on the status of the object.
In this case, the object does not have an active status entered in the valuation methods in Customizing for WIP calculation and results analysis. Consequently, WIP calculation and results analysis cannot find a method with which the object can be processed.
Procedure
Decide whether the object should be processed in its current state (indicated by its active status in status management) by WIP calculation and results analysis.
If you want to process the object:
In Customizing for results analysis, choose Period-End Closing -> Results Analysis -> Define Valuation Methods for Results Analysis, add an entry for this status, and specify how objects with this status should be processed.
If you do not want to process the object:
This message is inconsequential for you. No follow-up actions are necessary.
In Customizing for results analysis, choose Period-End Closing -> Results Analysis -> Define Valuation Methods for Results Analysis and select the No valuation indicator. This message is then no longer issued by the system.
Example:
In the standard system, there is normally no entry in the valuation method for the status CRTD (Created). You will therefore receive this message for objects that only have the status CRTD.

Hi Guys,
I manage to run the RA. The problem why I could'nt get it right was because I did not run transaction MMPV to close period for material master
Thanks for your help.

Results Analysis on WIP

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for