Retain the LAN, Disable the WAN

Is there a way to maintain LAN services, but disable (for a few days, anyway) the computer's/system's attempts to access the Internet over that same network?
My DSL service is temporarily down, and the telecom is testing it remotely from their end. That means I've had to open portions of the modem's firewall to allow them access--and that means I don't want to leave it connected to the router. I can still transfer files across the network, and can still access my NAS; but my Mac Pro, and all its applications, are used to finding an Internet connection through that router, and now that WAN services are unavailable, some apps drag when opened, and some just freeze altogether.
Is there a way to modify my system (such as a temporary network location) so that the LAN still works, but which will stop looking for Internet access?
Thanks in advance,
Jess

Jess Driskell wrote:
No, the router (Linksys RVS4000) and modem (Zyxel 660R) are two separate pieces of hardware. There's an Ethernet port on the back of the router for connecting the modem, but, as I wrote, I've disconnected that cable for security reasons. And the modem will have to be reconnected to the router (eventually) to have network-wide Internet access.
Then you are all set. The router will allow your LAN to work, sans the internet connection and there is zero security issue with anything concerning the modem.
I would advise you to turn off the WiFi on the modem, unless your ISP requires it to be on.

Similar Messages

  • Using the WAN port as a "LAN" port on the Airport Extreme Base Station...

    Hi everyone,
    I'm re-building my home wireless network and I'm doing so in preparation for the Slingbox AV I ordered last week. Here's my current setup:
    I have a DSL modem attached to an Airport Express (802.11n) in my office broadcasting my internet signal. I have an Airport Extreme Base Station (802.11g) set up in my living room as a WDS extender. I currently use the base station in my living room to connect the DishNetwork ViP722 DVR to the internet and allow me to set recordings remotely on my iPhone when I'm away from home. I use the LAN port on the base station to do this, and now with the Slingbox on the way (should be here early next week), I'm wondering what I need to do to make an internet connection available for the Slingbox AV.
    My question: Will I be able to simply use the WAN port as a "LAN" port since the Airport Extreme Base Station is being used as a WDS? It'd be awesome if the WAN port would become, essentially, a LAN port since it isn't being used.
    Thanks in advance for your advice and insight!

    slugoo wrote:
    My question: Will I be able to simply use the WAN port as a "LAN" port since the Airport Extreme Base Station is being used as a WDS? It'd be awesome if the WAN port would become, essentially, a LAN port since it isn't being used.
    I'd be surprised if that worked. The operation of an AirPort base station depends on keeping the WAN port and the LAN port(s) separate, as those normally are on two different networks.
    You might consider buying an Ethernet hub or switch, which would allow your AirPort Extreme's LAN port to be shared. Here's an example of an inexpensive one:
    http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?skuId=7169244&st=ethernet+switch&type=pr oduct&id=1110266457435

  • Can the WAN port be used as LAN when AirPort Express (2nd Generation) is setup to join a wireless network?

    Can the WAN port be used as LAN when AirPort Express (2nd Generation) is setup to join a wireless network? (IE: 2 LAN ports)
    I haven't been able to get a clear answer on this. I believe the 1st generation would act as WAN/LAN depending on setting, but what happens with the 2nd generation?
    Thank you for your time.

    If the Express joins a wireless network wirelessly, in other words its WAN port isn't connected to anything, the correct way to connect a wired client to it is by using its LAN port.
    I don't know what would happen if you were to connect a wired client to its WAN port instead — it's just not supposed to be used for that purpose. It won't permanently break anything if you were to try it though. If you were, the worst that would occur is that your network would become unresponsive as packets continuously traverse its WAN port in a circular fashion, which might require that you power down your router to reset your whole network.
    If you are already using your Express's LAN port and you need another, the way to provide more ports is to purchase an inexpensive ($10 or so) switch. Connect it to the LAN port and as many other pieces of equipment as the switch's available number of ports.
    You're correct about the first generation with the single Ethernet port. It could be used in either capacity depending on its configuration.

  • Trying to set up Time Capsule to MacBook Air but it only recognises the ethernet LAN connection and not the WAN Any ideas?

    If I put the ethernet cable in the WAN port of the capsule my book doesn't pick it up but when I put it in the LAN one it does. Then it tells me it needs the WAN connection I tried rebooting in various ways including modem but I can't get past 2 problems i.e.  Problem1 - Double NAT so I click the Bridge Mode and then it asks me to place the cable in the WAN port. As soon as I do it loses it. The light is flashing amber so its clearly a connection problem. Any ideas anyone?

    The WAN port is for the ethernet cable that is coming straight from your modem/router.
    Plug your computer into any of the Lan ports.
    Once you're configured (and in bridge mode) it won't matter after that, but leave those details for later.

  • "conflicts with the WAN IP address"

    I just picked up a used AirPort Extreme N (Gigabit Ethernet) to replace my current non-Apple router, which has worked satisfactorily but lacks the ability to share disks--something I need. Using my G5 running 10.4.11, I downloaded AirPort Utility 5.4.2 to set up the new (to me) device, and did a factory reset just to clear everything out. I placed the AirPort in the network exactly where the old one had been--with its WAN port connected to the line supplied by my ISP (see below) and its three other ethernet ports connected to various clients. Then I ran into a problem:
    Under the "Internet" icon of Airport Utility, I set it to Connect Using Ethernet, and Configure IPv4 using DHCP (My current router uses DHCP to provide IP addresss to both the wired and wireless devices on my network). The numbers below that are: IP address 192.168.1.12, subnet mask 255.255.255.0, and router address 192.168.1.1.
    The first field of the line labeled "DNS Server(s)" defaults to 192.168.1.1, while the second field is empty, as are the fields Domain Name and DHCP Client ID. I left Ethernet WAN port on "Automatic" and put "Connection Sharing" on "Share a Public IP address," since I believe its combination of DHCP and NAT offer the best security.
    The problem: When I click the "Update" button to confirm my settings, I get this message: "The DHCP range you have entered conflicts with the WAN IP address of your Apple wireless device."
    Although I am unclear as to why the Internet Connection pane of the AirPort Utility lists "IP address" and "Router address" as two separate numbers (aren't they referring to the same device, the AirPort itself? How can it have two IP addresses?), I figured that I could play it safe and change the starting number to 192.168.1.13 to avoid the conflicts with 192.168.1.12.
    But I still get the same error message when pressing "update." I tried changing the range to 192.168.1.50 - 192.168.1.60, and I still get the same error message. There seems to be no range that the utility will accept as non-conflicting with the "WAN IP address" of the Airport.
    My ISP did not provide a visible modem as others in the past have done. The internet connection they left me simply comes out of a box on the back of the house that is connected by fiber optics to (presumably) a fiber optic line out in the street. However, this "supply line" has always worked fine with my non-Apple router and--after disconnecting the AirPort that had temporarily taken its place--is working right now as I throw this question to the forum.
    Additional notes:
    * Under the NAT tab, the box "Enable NAT Port Mapping Protocol" is checked, as it was by default) while "Enable default host at" is unchecked and blank.
    * While I currently have wireless turned on in the AirPort, I haven't even tried wireless connectivity yet and want to make sure my wired connectivity is working first.
    Thanks for any assistance.

    The problem: When I click the "Update" button to confirm my settings, I get this message: "The DHCP range you have entered conflicts with the WAN IP address of your Apple wireless device."
    This error message typically indicates that your 802.11n AirPort Extreme Base Station (AEBSn) is receiving a Private (as opposed to a Public IP address) on its WAN port. That could be because your ISP does not provide any device (computer or router), that is directly connected to their "box," with a Public IP address.
    Your AEBSn is both a DHCP client (on the WAN-side) and a DHCP server (on the LAN-side). The Configure IPv4 is basically the on/off switch for the AEBSn's DHCP client. It's other option, PPPoE, would only be used if your ISP requires it.
    One option would be to reconfigure the AEBSn as a bridge. This would disable both the AEBSn's NAT & DHCP services.
    Although I am unclear as to why the Internet Connection pane of the AirPort Utility lists "IP address" and "Router address" as two separate numbers (aren't they referring to the same device, the AirPort itself? How can it have two IP addresses?
    The IP address information on (actually the TCP/IP pane) is showing you the AEBSn's WAN port settings. Settings that with Configure IPv4 set to Using DHCP would come from the DHCP server upstream of it. If this server was providing Public IP addresses then the values in both the IP Address & Router Address fields would not be in any of the three valid Private IP Address ranges (10.x, 172.x, or 192.x)
    Under the NAT tab, the box "Enable NAT Port Mapping Protocol" is checked, as it was by default) while "Enable default host at" is unchecked and blank.
    This setting would not have anything to do with the error message that you are getting. Instead, this option is used as an on/off switch for the NAT-PMP protocol. This protocol is similar to non-AirPorts' UPnP protocol.
    While I currently have wireless turned on in the AirPort, I haven't even tried wireless connectivity yet and want to make sure my wired connectivity is working first.
    Both wired and wireless clients will be impacted by this until resolved. I again, suggest that you try reconfiguring the AEBSn as a bridge. (ref: AirPort Utility > Select the AEBSn > Manual Setup > Internet > Internet Connection > Connection Sharing = Off (Bridge Mode))

  • Can't connect to my VPN server from the WAN addres...

    I've setup a PPTP VPN server on a Raspberry Pi, so that I can connect to it when out and about and avoid having my android internet use sniffed by random public wi-fi hotspots.
    It seems to be working as I setup a Windows 7 connection to it using the LAN address (192.168.1.85) and that connected fine but I can't get it to work through the BT HH3 via the WAN address. I've forwarded port 1723 to 192.168.1.85 and tried disabling the firewall, enabling port clamping and putting the RPi in the DMZ, none of which made any difference.
    Is anyone able to help please?

    Did some testing from my parents house yesterday and whilst connected to their router (Virgin Media) and/or a local BTWiFi hotspot (I can't honestly remember if I tried both or if I only tested with one or the other), I was able to connect to the VPN Server from my phone.
    I can also connect from my home PC using Putty to the VPN Server on SSH (port 22) with that forwarded in the router using the WAN address, so NAT travesal doesn't seem to be an issue.
    Yet I still can't connect to the VPN Server from home, whether connected to my HH3 or a local BTWiFI-with-FON hotspot, using the WAN address, only the LAN address, which doesn't make any sense to me.
    I don't think it's relevant to this problem but I want to ask a question about the router firewall as the description for Default (which is what I have enabled) says "Allow all outgoing connections and block all unsolicited incoming traffic. Games and application sharing is allowed." but it doesn't appear to block unsolicited incoming traffic as otherwise I don't think I'd have been able to connect to the VPN Server from my parent's house, or on SSH from my PC using the WAN address. So is the description incorrect?

  • Airport Extreme(SW) keeps dropping the WAN connection under "heavy" load

    Hey,
    Have had this problem ever since I got the Airport Extreme when it first came out and I got it.
    The problem is this : The connection will work just fine for ages, but if I end up downloading something using (primarily this is the problem) torrents and I end up getting a rather good speed on it the airport will all of the sudden stop getting data from the WAN(ADSL modem connected to it through the WAN connection) and the Airport will have to be restarted. Some days it will have to be restarted up towards 15 times a day.
    The Airport remains accessible through the LAN connection, as well as through the WiFi when it has failed like this so I can go in through the Airport Admin Utility and restart the unit without any problems whatsoever. The modem does not need restart or reiniting either.
    The problem occurs no matter of if I am on the hard wired (LAN) connection or the WiFi connection. If I download something using a torrent that is high speed, especially if its more then one torrent at the same time (say 4 torrents each running at 200-300kbps therefor peaking at the roof of what my DSL connection can handle) then it will absolutely lock up after a minute or so. If I only do surfing or 'ordinary' work then there is no problem.
    The problem is easily repeated.
    * If I connect my laptop by wire to the modem directly without the airport in between there will be no problem.
    * I have software reseted the Airport many times to attempt to fix the problem when it has gotten on my nerves with no positive or changing result.
    * I have the latest available from Apple firmware(5.6) installed on the Airport.
    * I have no 'weird' or abnormal settings set on the Airport, and no neighbors playing tricks on me - This problem was with me when I used the airport fully locked down in a office environment and then went with it when I moved my airport unit out of my office in to my home.
    * I have no other wifi units in the house that may cause problems, no bluetooth phones running amok.
    Airport details:
    Apple Airport Extreme Base Station
    Firmware Version: 5.6
    Wireless Security : Not currently enabled
    Wireless Channel : 1 (automatic)
    Built in modem : No
    Prod # : M8930LL/A (A-1034)

    Hi guys,
    Recently I bought AirPort Extreme 802.11n Base Station (Gigabit, MB053LL/A), and
    seems, I have very similar problem with yours. Internet connection from my ISP over WAN is dropped after few hours of being idle. The router successfully receives its IP settings from provider's DHCP, eveyithing is working fine at first and as long as I have some inet activity. Then I disconnect, or sleep my laptops, and when I'm back - WAN provides no Internet traffic at all It looks like WAN is not functioning or blocked in someway. AirPort Utility and logs show no problems, all statuses are good, correct WAN IP settings are shown in the utility.
    Sometimes it helps to plug-out/in Ethernet cable to WAN port, but more often only full router restart helps (with around 10-20 secs of outage). BTW, WiFi connection between the router and laptops is pretty stable and causes absolutely no probs. HDD connected to the router works good also.
    My firmware is 7.2.1 (gigabit), and reading above posts I tried to downgrade to 7.2. It didn't fix the problem So well there are no earlier firmware versions for this AEBS model to try.
    Does anybody have ideas about it?
    (I understand you guys mostly wrote about 100Mbit version of AEBS)
    Thanks you,
    Strim

  • Does the WAN port in client mode on the Airport Express?

    On an Airport Express (2012 version, 802.11n), has anyone tried the following configuration? Is the WAN port active in client mode? Do you have any suggestions on this or similar configurations?
    I am trying to use Airplay to stream music to two Klipsch G-17 speakers. As I have discovered and also documented by Apple on their web page http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4587 in the section
    "Connecting to an existing Wi-Fi network as part of a legacy WDS or Extended Network", this is true "Due to the overhead required for this configuration, you may expect AirPlay drop-outs such as intermittent loss of audio."
    Configuration now:
    All Airport Expresses are the 2012 802.11n version with a LAN and a WAN port.
    There is one Airport Express in a home basement. It is connected to an Internet connection. This Internet connection goes into this home basement.
    There is a second Airport Express on the second floor of this home.
    Now, both Airport Expresses connect fine with the "extend network" option. There is wifi coverage throughout this home. All works fine until Airplay is used to stream music to these two Klipsch G-17 speakers. There are intermittent and persistent pauses. I am experiencing the what Apple documented in this kb article. I am not able to connect the two Airport Expresses with an ethernet cable. I cannot run a cable from the basement to the second floor.
    Has anyone tried this following configuration? Or is there a different configuration that would work, and if so, could you provide the configuration details?
    1. Connect the first Airport Express via client mode to the second, second floor Airport Express.
    2. Set the network default gateway to the first, basement Airport Express.
    The attempt is to eliminate the extended network, with its Airplay dropouts. And allow access to the Internet via the wifi network.
    - end -

    If the Express joins a wireless network wirelessly, in other words its WAN port isn't connected to anything, the correct way to connect a wired client to it is by using its LAN port.
    I don't know what would happen if you were to connect a wired client to its WAN port instead — it's just not supposed to be used for that purpose. It won't permanently break anything if you were to try it though. If you were, the worst that would occur is that your network would become unresponsive as packets continuously traverse its WAN port in a circular fashion, which might require that you power down your router to reset your whole network.
    If you are already using your Express's LAN port and you need another, the way to provide more ports is to purchase an inexpensive ($10 or so) switch. Connect it to the LAN port and as many other pieces of equipment as the switch's available number of ports.
    You're correct about the first generation with the single Ethernet port. It could be used in either capacity depending on its configuration.

  • Using imac 10.6.5 as router (with WiFi as the WAN)

    Happy Holidays,
    I have a few questions before I go out and spend the money on an Airport extreme. I have not been able to find much information on the specific setup I have in mind.
    Background: I have an iMac that connects to the internet through Optimum WiFi via the internal airport interface. I would like to bridge that internet connection to the wired ethernet port, with a wireless access point attached to it for a few devices in my house (iphone/xbox/etc...).
    Questions:
    1) Will the iMac act as a DHCP server on the ethernet port to give addresses to clients?
    2) Can I connect an Airport Extreme and my iMac through ethernet (I am assuming I will not use the WAN port) and use it as a normal access point? (As to not do any NATting/DHCP itself as it would if it were the router).
    Basically I want to bridge 2 WiFi networks (1 WAN, 1 internal, connected through the ethernet interface) for internet sharing and access between the devices. I like the Airport Extreme because it has wired ports as well as AirDisk but all of the setup scenarios I have seen so far describe setting it up either as a Router or Wireless extender.
    I "could" just connect all of my devices to Optimum WiFi, but I would like a fast internal network for the remote apps I use on my iphone, streaming, as well as any wired devices.
    Thank you,
    Jack
    1)

    Thanks for the reply.
    I am currently set up in an apartment by work for 6 months. We have Optimum Online at work, and with that comes the use of Optimum Wifi. So I do not have a router at the apartment (am trying to avoid purchasing separate broadband service that will only be for a few months.)
    - My iMac connects directly to Optimum WiFi, which has a strong signal in my area.
    - If I use internet sharing FROM my Airport (on mac) TO ethernet, that should be the only NAT. The iMac would act as the DHCP server, and the airport would simply be a wireless access point and a switch. (With added support for AirDisk, etc)
    - I've set up similar configs easily with a number of wireless APs (From SMC, Netgear, etc...). My main question is if the Airport Extreme can work just like a normal AP would, without all the DHCP management.
    I could just pick up a regular AP like http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=44682 40&CatId=372 and be done with it. But I like the extra features that the Airport Extreme has, and I will eventually use it as a router once I have a permanent apartment and proper broadband.
    Opt Wifi --> Mac Airport -> Mac (w/sharing) -> Mac Ethernet -> LAN port on Airport Express.
    My hope is clients connecting to the Express, should be getting the IP from the iMac, just like a plain Wireless AP would work.
    Thanks again.

  • How Can i retain the Shared Variable Values after PC rebooting

    Hi all,
    I am facing a paculiar problem with Shared Variables. I have an application in which shared variables are used for data communication.
    One of the application requirement is to retain the variable values eventhough PC is rebooted or started after crashing. 
    As per the my understanding, the variable values will retain eventhough the PC is rebooted. But here i can observe a paculiar problem like some library variables are retaing the values while some others not. I enabled logging for all the variables.
    I tried many ways. like logging enabled, logging disabled, changing variable names, changing process names etc... But i am not getting a consistent behaviour.
    I hope some you can help me in solving this issue.. "How Can i retain the Shared Variable Values after PC rebooting"
    Thanks and Regards,
    Mir

    Hi Blackperl,
    Thanks for the post and I hope your well. 
    What do you mean by not getting consistent behaviour.. this will all depend on excatly when the crash happens i.e. before the write or after. 
    Surely a better method would be to log the data to a file during the reboot...
    I beleived the value read back
    will be the default value for the shared variable's data type.
    The LabVIEW DSC 8.0 module adds more functionality to the shared variable, including initial values and alarms.
    If you enable an initial value on a shared variable, when the variable
    engine comes back on-line it will default to this value. Setting a bad
    status alarm for the shared variable is also a good way of handling
    this type of event. Additionally, if you are using a LabVIEW Real-Time
    target such as Compact RIO or Compact FieldPoint, it is appropriate to
    consider hosting the shared variable engine on the real-time target.
    These devices have watch-dog capabilities and are typically the
    hardware controlling the critical pieces of an application. Most
    Windows or PC-based targets do not have these fail-safes.
    I guess, if you could explain to me again that would be great. From my point of view, if I have a cRIO and a Windows PC. If the windows PC crashes, the cRIO will still update its shared variables. Then once the PC has started up its own shared variable engine, and the bindings are loaded, it will once again continue to update its copies of the variables.
    Please let me know what you think,
    Kind Regards,
    James.
    Kind Regards
    James Hillman
    Applications Engineer 2008 to 2009 National Instruments UK & Ireland
    Loughborough University UK - 2006 to 2011
    Remember Kudos those who help!

  • DNS: Client can't connect because .local domain isn't in DNS. How can I connect over the WAN to server.domain.local?

    So my 2012 server is set up on the LAN with a .local domain name. 
    Remote Desktop Services are set up and remoteapp stuff works fine on the LAN.
    I've set up port forwarding so I can connect to the server over the WAN too, but remoteapp stuff is a bit different. I can connect to the server by specifying the correct IP address. Giving a Web browser the address
    https://serverIPAddress/RDWeb
    lets me get the login screen and see the range of apps for me to run. I select one, the connectoid is downloaded correctly (in Chrome) and I click on the downloaded connectoid. 
    Unfortunately, rather than pursuing the sensible IP-address approach that I started with, the connectoid has been given the server's name on the LAN:  server.domain.local. Clearly, the client machine tries to look this up but DNS hasn't heard of
    it because it's a .local address. 
    I cannot be the only one to have come across this apparent oversight on Microsoft's part. Any ideas as to how this can sensibly be overcome? Obviously, I could put the IP address translation into every client's hosts file (and I've done this and shown it
    works) but I've got too many clients to mess about like this. Anybody know 'the Microsoft way' to fix this?
    Thank you for checking this out -- I am confident the details of the problem are completely specified in this query but, if I'm wrong, please ask.
    Many thanks again,
    Biffo

    Hi,
    I would like to suggest you to follow the checklist.
    Checklist: Make RemoteApp Programs Available from the Internet
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc772415.aspx
    Thanks.
    Jeremy Wu
    TechNet Community Support

  • Macs with Filesharing Turned on Appearing on Networks Through the WAN Port

    I am trying to find out why it is that Macs that have filesharing turned on are appearing on people's network even when they are not on the same LAN.
    We run a small ISP in our town and have about 180 client sites that we service. I had a call from a client panicking because he could suddenly see unknown devices showing up in the Finder under Shared Devices. He could even see someone else's iTunes Library available for sharing, etc. This of course makes no sense, because although obviously all clients are technically on the same physical network, each client site has its own router, and is therefore behind a router.
    (And please do not comment about people getting onto his Wi-Fi, or else the bug in the Mac OS that sometimes does not release devices from the shared devices section even after they are gone from the network. This is NOT any of these situations. Please read on...).
    Initially I was convinced that he has opened up some port that he should not have. To test this I went to this client site, reset the router to clear any unwanted programming and plugged in my Mac directly into the WAN port of his router. And sure enough I appeared on his network. If I turned filesharing off, then I would disappear (which makes sense), but point is that with filesharing turned on, I seemed to be going through the router's firewall. Also interestingly enough, this penetration only seemed to be in one direction. That is WAN -> LAN, but not LAN -> WAN (I could not ever see any of HIS machines). Also, while I would appear on his network, I was not accessible by him. He could not actually connect to me.
    Is this happening because of Bonjour? If so, can I block Bonjour by closing some ports or protocols? But I also do not want to do that if it will cause any other applications from getting through that should be getting through (although I do not understand why Bonjour should be broadcasting through a firewall anyway).
    Thank you in advance for any comments.

    The best test I can suggest is to access when the Security Gateway is up and you are on the same LAN network as the ADT setup. If that works, unless the feeds are routed through some ADT server, the WAN side can be tested next. The ADT Gateway will not have a public IP for you to access. Do you have a link to a manual, or a the ADT model number of the gateway, so I can take a look at the setup guide?
    The normal setup is
    ISP <-> WAN IP <LAN Router/Gateway/Modem> <-> AEBS <Ethernet> ADT Gateway (LAN IP).
    LAN IPs are typically hidden from the world and are private IPs like 192.168.1.x ro 192.168.0.x or 10.x.x.x or 172.16.x.x.

  • HT1941 trying to connect time  apsule to macbook air with the ethernet cable in the WAN port the airport utility doesn't detect it

    trying to connect time  capsule to macbook air with the ethernet cable in the WAN port but the airport utility doesn't detect it but when i put it in the LAN one it does but it doesn't let me configure
    any ideas?

    Isn't it fun trying to do things without an ethernet cable direct to the computer.. Apple sell a usb to ethernet adapter cable fairly cheap.. makes life a lot easier having something to do hard connections.. or as hard as usb can manage.
    Since you have to access the TC by wireless .. press and hold the reset button on the TC for about 10sec until front led flashes rapidly.. don't worry about the ethernet cable.. leave it disconnected.
    Now click on the airport symbol and join another network. The TC should revert to its home name.. which will be a combo of Time Capsule and its MAC address. There is no wireless security and you can do the setup.

  • How to retain the master slide background at the end of the quiz reporting page of a project

    I have noticed that the content of the master slide is not retained till the end in the quiz results page of the project. What should I do to retain the contents till the end of the project?

    Hi,
    Thanks for your time. I have checked the transitions. i didnt give any transition to the slides in the project and i also check the preferences too, i had disable the options that is to fade in and fade out. My problem is "I have 12 slides in this with an intro slide and 10 question slides and then the quiz results page. In that result page, it is showing the result at the end of the result slide the pause button in the skin turned to play button. While clicking that play button it shows only the results, review quiz button and retake quiz button only. It doesn't display the images, widgets, text and some other options which is used in master slide or in the slide itself " Why those things have disappeared? Can you guide me how to overcome this issue.
    The solution for the playbar is quiet good. One more doubt in that, The play bar should be displayed in that page but it should be disabled, Is there any solution for this? If yes, kindly share with me

  • Which port is the WAN port?

    which port is the WAN port?

    The WAN port will have a "world" icon, which looks more like a circle of dots.
    The  LAN port(s) will have opposing arrows....something like this <->

  • Trying to set up Directv GenieGO using Airport Extreme.  Getting error message: DHCP range entered conflicts with the WAN IP Address of your base station.  How do I resolve the conflict.

    Trying to configure an Airport Extreme manually.  After I enter the IP Address of the GenieGo along with the rest of information required I am getting the following error message when I click update:
    DHCP range entered conflicts with the WAN IP address of your base station. 
    How do I resolve the conflict? 

    You cannot use the same range on LAN and WAN if you are routing.. it must be different.. and you should not be routing at all.
    The AE should be in bridge mode. NO DHCP settings at all.

Maybe you are looking for

  • I Can No Longer Find My Printer via AirPrint

    I have an iPhone 4S with iOS 5.0.1 and an HP Photosmart 6510, both connected to the same router (it's a Comcast Xfinity Router/Modem combo) but my phone cannot pick up the printer. Any help/suggestions?

  • Digitizer Selection

    Hi all, I'm looking for a digitizer that has capability of measuring up to 300Vp-p and up to 1.5MHz sinusoidal waveform, and can be installed on a 3U PXI chassis. Anyone has any recommmedation on which vendor to use. Thanks Dan

  • Solaris 10 X86 bug at boot

    hi, I've got a serious trouble after installing the OS. the first time i boot on it (i've also got windows XP on my system, a packard bell laptop h5530), it writes me, at screen, something that looks like an html table, and for each tag say : class n

  • BADI OR USER-EXIT NAME FOR CJ20N

    Hi GURU , Is there anyother BADI which is triggre in the time of Confirmation . The process is - CJ20N - > Internal Activity - > User Field - > U can select or Not Check box ( I need when we will not select Check Box ) - > EDIT - > Activity - > Confi

  • 9.0.4 to 10.1.2 upgrade text fields moved

    We upgraded from 9.0.4 to 10.1.2 forms. In one application some of the text fields moved up a small amount - 1/10 of an inch or so. This does not present a problem on some forms, but on others text fields begin to overlap with with text. I thought ma