Retrospect support for the OPTIARC DVD RW AD-7170A

Hi there,
Has anyone communicated with EMC re. Retrospect supporting the OPTIARC DVD RW AD-7170A drive on the Mac Pro? I see that others are experiencing issues with the Mac Pro's DVD drive on the Retrospect forum so I thought I'd ask here.
Cheers,
-C

EMC provided an update (finally)

Similar Messages

Dropped support for high-def dvd?

Does anyone know if Mavericks dropped support for the HD DVD format offered by Compressor 3?
A DVD authored with this format will not play on an iMac (2.4 Intel Core 2 Duo) running Mavericks, but will play on a Mac Pro (2x2Ghz Dual-Core Intel Xeon) running Mac OS 10.6.8. Other DVDs play fine on the iMac.
Thanks in advance for any information regarding this.

The CalDigit card is not rated to work on the NEWEST MacPros...the ones with different processors and other internal circuitry. It works fine on previous models. The big reason I suggest the Caldigit card over the rest is:
1) It is half the price with all the same features
2) It can be installed and removed by the customer. The Apple card can only be installed and removed by a certified Apple dealer.
Now, Raid 5 is good as it offers PROTECTION...where RAID 0 does not. If one drive dies, the RAID 5 still works. If the same happened to Raid 0, all info is lost...ALL. Raid 5 will lower the capacity of all the drives, as it uses one for this protection, where Raid 0 is larger. Give and take.
FYI...I cut DVCPRO HD and ProRes on internal drives...no raid. Firewire 800 drives are good for this format too. Raids are only needed for multiple streams of ProRes, and the uncompressed formats. And for protection.
Shane

OPTIARC DVD RW AD-7170A+writing CD Text

hallo,
do somebody know wether it is possible that the OPTIARC DVD RW AD-7170A build in MAc Pro 2x2,8 Ghz Quad Core, is able to write CD text form Wave Burner (part of Logic). So that the CD titel and track titel is seen on the desktop when you put in an burnt CD
thank you for answer
hubert

I've read about the Liggy/Dee firmware flashing for these drives, but honestly the instructions seem unclear and a little complicated.
The Mac Pro is so quiet that I would not install the Liggy/Dee firmware. The speed for importing data was 300% faster with the the Liggy/Dee firmware but the DVD became very loud. I ended up getting a Pioneer DVR replacement that was fast and quiet.

Updating of firmware for drive Optiarc DVD Rw AD-5680H

updating of firmware for drive Optiarc DVD Rw AD-5680H
it seems compulsory since burning of DVD Verbatim disks are failed
but successful with Verbatim DVD -RW
Mac Mini ,Mountain Lion etc
the drive of my PowerBook Pro
works well
Mashita DVD -R UJ -868
where can I find and download this updafe
THKS

Failure with one type of optical media and not another -- even from the same manufacturer -- is not unusual. DVDs and DVD-RWs use different dies that respond to different lasers in the optical drive. There are numerous other possibllities here.
It would not be unusual if the write laser for DVDs has burned out but the DVD-RW is still working becasue they use entirely separate lasers of a different intensity and frequency.
It may be the dyes used in a particular lot of Verbatim DVDs are not quite compatible with the DVD lasers in your drive (that is independent of DVD-RWs because they use different lasers.
Because of manufacturing variations your drive may burn other brands of DVD blanks flwlessly, but just won't work with Verbatim DVD blanks.
The DVD Read/Write lasers in your drive may simply be dirty.
Changing/updating the firmware in an optical can be done, but there is a definite risk of converting the optical drive into something useful only as a paper weight.
Try another brand of DVD blank or even a different model Verbatim. (I have seen cases where discs from a different manufacturing lot from the same vendor worked when another failed.)
If you are using DVD-R blanks try a DVD+R (there again different lasers are involved.
It is tricky to clean slot loading optical drives, but sometimes simply blowing them out with short bursts of canned air will work. Be sure the computer has been powered down for a good while and the optical drive is completely cooled. Then use only short bursts of air to prevent super cooled liquid air from getting into the drive. That can easily crack the lenses if you aren't careful.
If your Mac mini is less than a year old or you have Apple Care, get an appointment and take it to the Genius Desk of the nearest Apple store. If you aren't covered under warranty a bus powered external optical drive very probably costs less than the labor charge to diagnose the issue with your drive.

Selective XML Index feature is not supported for the current database version , SQL Server Extended Events , Optimizing Reading from XML column datatype

Team , Thanks for looking into this ..
As a last resort on optimizing my stored procedure ( Below ) i wanted to create a Selective XML index ( Normal XML indexes doesn't seem to be improving performance as needed ) but i keep getting this error within my stored proc . Selective XML
Index feature is not supported for the current database version.. How ever
EXECUTE sys.sp_db_selective_xml_index; return 1 , stating Selective XML Indexes are enabled on my current database .
Is there ANY alternative way i can optimize below stored proc ?
Thanks in advance for your response(s) !
/****** Object: StoredProcedure [dbo].[MN_Process_DDLSchema_Changes] Script Date: 3/11/2015 3:10:42 PM ******/
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
-- EXEC [dbo].[MN_Process_DDLSchema_Changes]
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[MN_Process_DDLSchema_Changes]
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON --Does'nt have impact ( May be this wont on SQL Server Extended events session's being created on Server(s) , DB's )
SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ UNCOMMITTED
select getdate() as getdate_0
DECLARE @XML XML , @Prev_Insertion_time DATETIME
-- Staging Previous Load time for filtering purpose ( Performance optimize while on insert )
SET @Prev_Insertion_time = (SELECT MAX(EE_Time_Stamp) FROM dbo.MN_DDLSchema_Changes_log ) -- Perf Optimize
-- PRINT '1'
CREATE TABLE #Temp
EventName VARCHAR(100),
Time_Stamp_EE DATETIME,
ObjectName VARCHAR(100),
ObjectType VARCHAR(100),
DbName VARCHAR(100),
ddl_Phase VARCHAR(50),
ClientAppName VARCHAR(2000),
ClientHostName VARCHAR(100),
server_instance_name VARCHAR(100),
ServerPrincipalName VARCHAR(100),
nt_username varchar(100),
SqlText NVARCHAR(MAX)
CREATE TABLE #XML_Hold
ID INT NOT NULL IDENTITY(1,1) PRIMARY KEY , -- PK necessity for Indexing on XML Col
BufferXml XML
select getdate() as getdate_01
INSERT INTO #XML_Hold (BufferXml)
SELECT
CAST(target_data AS XML) AS BufferXml -- Buffer Storage from SQL Extended Event(s) , Looks like there is a limitation with xml size ?? Need to re-search .
FROM sys.dm_xe_session_targets xet
INNER JOIN sys.dm_xe_sessions xes
ON xes.address = xet.event_session_address
WHERE xes.name = 'Capture DDL Schema Changes' --Ryelugu : 03/05/2015 Session being created withing SQL Server Extended Events
--RETURN
--SELECT * FROM #XML_Hold
select getdate() as getdate_1
-- 03/10/2015 RYelugu : Error while creating XML Index : Selective XML Index feature is not supported for the current database version
CREATE SELECTIVE XML INDEX SXI_TimeStamp ON #XML_Hold(BufferXml)
FOR
PathTimeStamp ='/RingBufferTarget/event/timestamp' AS XQUERY 'node()'
--RETURN
--CREATE PRIMARY XML INDEX [IX_XML_Hold] ON #XML_Hold(BufferXml) -- Ryelugu 03/09/2015 - Primary Index
--SELECT GETDATE() AS GETDATE_2
-- RYelugu 03/10/2015 -Creating secondary XML index doesnt make significant improvement at Query Optimizer , Instead creation takes more time , Only primary should be good here
--CREATE XML INDEX [IX_XML_Hold_values] ON #XML_Hold(BufferXml) -- Ryelugu 03/09/2015 - Primary Index , --There should exists a Primary for a secondary creation
--USING XML INDEX [IX_XML_Hold]
---- FOR VALUE
-- --FOR PROPERTY
-- FOR PATH
--SELECT GETDATE() AS GETDATE_3
--PRINT '2'
-- RETURN
SELECT GETDATE() GETDATE_3
INSERT INTO #Temp
EventName ,
Time_Stamp_EE ,
ObjectName ,
ObjectType,
DbName ,
ddl_Phase ,
ClientAppName ,
ClientHostName,
server_instance_name,
nt_username,
ServerPrincipalName ,
SqlText
SELECT
p.q.value('@name[1]','varchar(100)') AS eventname,
p.q.value('@timestamp[1]','datetime') AS timestampvalue,
p.q.value('(./data[@name="object_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS objectname,
p.q.value('(./data[@name="object_type"]/text)[1]','varchar(100)') AS ObjectType,
p.q.value('(./action[@name="database_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS databasename,
p.q.value('(./data[@name="ddl_phase"]/text)[1]','varchar(100)') AS ddl_phase,
p.q.value('(./action[@name="client_app_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS clientappname,
p.q.value('(./action[@name="client_hostname"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS clienthostname,
p.q.value('(./action[@name="server_instance_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS server_instance_name,
p.q.value('(./action[@name="nt_username"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS nt_username,
p.q.value('(./action[@name="server_principal_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS serverprincipalname,
p.q.value('(./action[@name="sql_text"]/value)[1]','Nvarchar(max)') AS sqltext
FROM #XML_Hold
CROSS APPLY BufferXml.nodes('/RingBufferTarget/event')p(q)
WHERE -- Ryelugu 03/05/2015 - Perf Optimize - Filtering the Buffered XML so as not to lookup at previoulsy loaded records into stage table
p.q.value('@timestamp[1]','datetime') >= ISNULL(@Prev_Insertion_time ,p.q.value('@timestamp[1]','datetime'))
AND p.q.value('(./data[@name="ddl_phase"]/text)[1]','varchar(100)') ='Commit' --Ryelugu 03/06/2015 - Every Event records a begin version and a commit version into Buffer ( XML ) we need the committed version
AND p.q.value('(./data[@name="object_type"]/text)[1]','varchar(100)') <> 'STATISTICS' --Ryelugu 03/06/2015 - May be SQL Server Internally Creates Statistics for #Temp tables , we do not want Creation of STATISTICS Statement to be logged
AND p.q.value('(./data[@name="object_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') NOT LIKE '%#%' -- Any stored proc which creates a temp table within it Extended Event does capture this creation statement SQL as well , we dont need it though
AND p.q.value('(./action[@name="client_app_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') <> 'Replication Monitor' --Ryelugu : 03/09/2015 We do not want any records being caprutred by Replication Monitor ??
SELECT GETDATE() GETDATE_4
-- SELECT * FROM #TEMP
-- SELECT COUNT(*) FROM #TEMP
-- SELECT GETDATE()
-- RETURN
-- PRINT '3'
--RETURN
INSERT INTO [dbo].[MN_DDLSchema_Changes_log]
[UserName]
,[DbName]
,[ObjectName]
,[client_app_name]
,[ClientHostName]
,[ServerName]
,[SQL_TEXT]
,[EE_Time_Stamp]
,[Event_Name]
SELECT
CASE WHEN T.nt_username IS NULL OR LEN(T.nt_username) = 0 THEN t.ServerPrincipalName
ELSE T.nt_username
END
,T.DbName
,T.objectname
,T.clientappname
,t.ClientHostName
,T.server_instance_name
,T.sqltext
,T.Time_Stamp_EE
,T.eventname
FROM
#TEMP T
/** -- RYelugu 03/06/2015 - Filters are now being applied directly while retrieving records from BUFFER or on XML
-- Ryelugu 03/15/2015 - More filters are likely to be added on further testing
WHERE ddl_Phase ='Commit'
AND ObjectType <> 'STATISTICS' --Ryelugu 03/06/2015 - May be SQL Server Internally Creates Statistics for #Temp tables , we do not want Creation of STATISTICS Statement to be logged
AND ObjectName NOT LIKE '%#%' -- Any stored proc which creates a temp table within it Extended Event does capture this creation statement SQL as well , we dont need it though
AND T.Time_Stamp_EE >= @Prev_Insertion_time --Ryelugu 03/05/2015 - Performance Optimize
AND NOT EXISTS ( SELECT 1 FROM [dbo].[MN_DDLSchema_Changes_log] MN
WHERE MN.[ServerName] = T.server_instance_name -- Ryelugu Server Name needes to be added on to to xml ( Events in session )
AND MN.[DbName] = T.DbName
AND MN.[Event_Name] = T.EventName
AND MN.[ObjectName]= T.ObjectName
AND MN.[EE_Time_Stamp] = T.Time_Stamp_EE
AND MN.[SQL_TEXT] =T.SqlText -- Ryelugu 03/05/2015 This is a comparision Metric as well , But needs to decide on
-- Peformance Factor here , Will take advise from Lance if comparision on varchar(max) is a vital idea
--SELECT GETDATE()
--PRINT '4'
--RETURN
SELECT
top 100
[EE_Time_Stamp]
,[ServerName]
,[DbName]
,[Event_Name]
,[ObjectName]
,[UserName]
,[SQL_TEXT]
,[client_app_name]
,[Created_Date]
,[ClientHostName]
FROM
[dbo].[MN_DDLSchema_Changes_log]
ORDER BY [EE_Time_Stamp] desc
-- select getdate()
-- ** DELETE EVENTS after logging into Physical table
-- NEED TO Identify if this @XML can be updated into physical system table such that previously loaded events are left untoched
-- SET @XML.modify('delete /event/class/.[@timestamp="2015-03-06T13:01:19.020Z"]')
-- SELECT @XML
SELECT GETDATE() GETDATE_5
END
GO
Rajkumar Yelugu

@@Version : ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Microsoft SQL Server 2012 - 11.0.5058.0 (X64)
   May 14 2014 18:34:29
   Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation
   Developer Edition (64-bit) on Windows NT 6.2 <X64> (Build 9200: ) (Hypervisor)
(1 row(s) affected)
Compatibility level is set to 110 .
One of the limitation states - XML columns with a depth of more than 128 nested nodes
How do i verify this ? Thanks .
Rajkumar Yelugu

Can you please put me in touch with the support for the trial copy of adobe acrobat XI pro which I had tried out on March 15 for 30 days. I have been trying to cancel since the cost is too much and Acrobat Reader is OK for me. I can't find uninstaller.

Can you please put me in touch with the support for the trial copy of adobe acrobat XI pro which I had tried out on March 15 for 30 days. I have been trying to cancel since the cost is too much and Acrobat Reader is OK for me. I can't find uninstaller.
I have had to erase my disk since then with trouble with Apple Store not recognising my machine and the reload from Time Machine has given complications . Can you please cancel my trial and return my Trial money.

If you paid for what you used then it was not a trial.
Look thru the following links and use the chat option if required for your situation:
Cancel your membership or subscription | Creative Cloud
https://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/policy-pricing/cancel-membership-subscription.html
https://forums.adobe.com/thread/1703848
Chat support - For the link below click the Still Need Help? option in the blue area at the bottom and choose the chat option...
Creative Cloud support (all Creative Cloud customer service issues)
http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/global/service-ccm.html ( http://adobe.ly/19llvMN )
Phone support | Orders, returns exchanges
http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/global/phone-support-orders.html

Why no RAW support for the Fuji FinePix HS10?

This camera is well over a year old. Why is there no support for the RAW file?

It is definitely not only Fuji. I used a Panasonic Lumix FX-150 before that has been supported by Adobe Camera Raw for quite some time now. I replaced that camera by a Lumix LX5, but I see that the FX-150 is still not supported by Apple Camera Raw and probably never will.
If you want wide range RAW support, use Lightroom. (Not to say that Aperture doesn't have its strengths, e.g. support for geocoding.)

Why no support for the Leica M9 in LR 2.6 RC?

Hi - bemused that there's no support for the M9 in this release (especially as LR is bundled with the M9). Even more confusing as the Standard Adobe calibration profile for the M9 that comes with the LR3 Beta is pretty good (beats the embedded profile that comes with the Leica DNGs) - and this can be added to the LR2.5 profile library with a bit of copying and pasting.
I'd be grateful to hear from Adobe if there's any chance of a good M9 profile making it to the 2.6 final version. Seems a shame to miss this opportunity.
Thanks
Chris Tribble

Hello Chris,
thanks for the nice feedback.
For the moment, I will use LR for the fast preview of all images,
cataloging etc., and RawDeveloper for the fine tuning, as often as the
image permit it.
(sorry for my english!)
Lets hope that we will get through all that without loosing our
perfectly nice temper !
All the best to you,
Alain
Le 11 déc. 09 à 09:39, Chris_Tribble a écrit :
Alain - 1eme - je suis un particulier - aucun fonction chez Adobe.
Aussi -
je m'excuse d'avant pour mon Francais bottant et sans elegance! Je
n'ai
jamais fais des etuded en francais - et aussi mon clavier anglais
manquent
les diacritiques...
>
Quelque petit reponses.
>
>>>> First I have installed the 2.6 version, that is said to work
>>>> alongside the 2.5... but of course, it has replaced it. How to
>>>> reinstall the 2.5 alongside, hase they have the same name ?
>>>
>>> C'est pas la peine - 2.6 est meilleur - vous pouvez rester
>> avec ca...
>
>> ok, mais c'est tout de même juste le contraire de ce que
>> disent sur le site Adobe vos notes d'installation (rien de
>> très neuf non plus en cette matière, hélas, quant aux infos
>> approximatives ou manquantes d'Adobe)
>
CT: Pas vrais je crois - Version 3 beta peut co-exister - mais 2.6
doit
remplacer 2.5...
>
>>>> And then, I have tried to find a M9 profile, read your
>> posts, do my
>>>> job, install the beta 3.0, fond the "M9 Digital Camera Adobe
>>>> Standard.dcp", put a copy of that in any cameraRaw description
>>>> files... and so what ? In 2.6, I only have the choice between
>>>> "embeded" (=incorporé in french) and "Adobe standard" when
>> I select a
>>>> M9 dng file / but I've more choice when I select a M8 dng
>> file (ACR
>>>> 4.4, ACR 3.6, Adobe standard, Adobe standard beta 2,
>> camera standard,
>>>> camera standard beta 2).
>>>> 1. Do I miss something ?
>>>> 2. what should I do to find and use the M9 specific profile ?
>>>>
>>
>>>> Encore une fois - il n'y a pas de probleme...
>>> "Adobe Standard" marche tres bien...
>> moui... si vous le dites... mais il me convient assez mal, et
>> j'aimerais tout de même comprendre pourquoi je ne peux pas
>> charger un profil correspondant à mon M9... je ne comprends
>> pas non plus pourquoi il n'y a pas de profil par optique
>> développé par Leica... et en Suisse, personne de chez eux ne
>> peut répondre à ces questions... alors même que LR 2.5 est
>> livré en bundle avec le m9!
>
CT: Alors - Adobe Standard EST le profil developé par Adobe pour le
M9 - et
c'est le meme qu'on trouve dans LR 3 beta. Selon mon experience c'est
meilleur que le "embedded profile". Pas parfait, mais pas mal non
plus
Vous pouvez vous meme telecharger le DNG editor
(http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/DNG_Profiles).
>
>
>> je suis professionnel, et très loin d'être heureux avec LR...
>> (ni avec aucun raw developper, pour être franc, ni
>> captureOne, ni... encore que justement, RawDevelopper a des
>> qualités intéressantes - à côté de grande faiblesses... mais
>> c'est encore un autre sujet)
>>
>> mais j'ai bien l'intention de m'accrocher, ne serait-ce que
>> pour la puissance de gestion/catalogage et l'interface de
>> LR... quoi que je n'ai aucune confiance en son bricolage des
>> dng -> donc multiplier les backups des fichiers tels que
>> sortis du m9, etc... on dirait bien que malgré 15 ans
>> d'expérience, nous en soyons toujours au balbutiements du digital !
>>
>> C'est tout de même plus sérieux (du point de vue des
>> résultats) du côté de Leaf (j'utilise un L75 sur Alpa
>> 12SWA)... ça ressemble à quelque chose, mais en petit format,
>> après le m8, le m9 est vraiment encore loin du compte ! Et
>> leur développeur, bien sûr, ne développe... que leurs
>> fichiers propriétaires. Lorsque quelqu'un aura décidé dans
>> quelques années que leur format .mos est dépassé, mon travail
>> sera tout simplement perdu. Sauf à convertir en catastrophe
>> quelques dizaines ou centaines de milliers de fichiers ?
>> Encourageant, n'est-ce pas ?
>>
>>> By the way, I also had this blue pixels lines in the 2500iso
>>>>
>>>> files... anyway to save back the file without this bug ?
>>>
>>> Je ne vois pas cette image .... Peut etre vous pourriez
>> m'envoyer par
>>> email? (mailto:mailto:mailto:[email protected])
>> Je ne l'ai malheureusement pas avec moi, sur mon portable, et
>> n'y accéderai plus avant quelques jours...
>>
>> Leica Suisse (avec qui je suis en relation directe et qui a reçu ce
>> fichier) vient de m'appeler et ils reconnaissent - enfin - le
>> problème.
>> Mais ils ne savent toujours pas si et comment il vont le résoudre.
>> Rien avant l'année prochaine, quoi qu'il en soit, et ce sera
>> fixé, selon eux, soit :
>> - par un nouveau firmware (difficile à croire)
>> - par un passage de l'appareil entre leur mains, avec modif/
>> remplacement d'une partie du soft/hardware
>> - par un échange d'appareil (!!!) si c'est le capteur qui est
>> en cause (l'un de mes M8.2 avait été échangé de même à leur
>> frais après 3 mois, pour d'autres problèmes électroniques) Le
>> problème de ces lignes de pixels bleus sur certaines prises
>> de vue en haute sensibilité est largement débattu sur les
>> forums, et Leica vient de comprendre qu'il n'est pas
>> extérieur au M9, comme ils le disaient il n'y a pas si
>> longtemps... encore une petite bombe à leur actif !
>> Dite-moi si ça vous intéresse et je vous les ferai suivre...
>
CT: J'avais un tel probleme avec le M8.2 - chez le M9 pour le moment
ca
marche!
>>
>> Par ailleurs, ils viennent de me proposer de repasser toutes
>> mes optiques au banc (codées par leurs soins il y a moins
>> d'un an) pour les ajuster une nouvelle fois au mieux au m9...
>> là aussi, ils reconnaissent des failles techniques sérieuses
>> ! J'ai par exemple un summicron 35 asph parfait sur film et
>> sur m8, qui est... flou (sur les bords, et irrégulièrement)
>> sur mon m9 ! Interressant...
>>
CT: c'est vrais que les boittier numerique sont plus exigeant - je
conseil
un contact direct avec Leica a Solms.... Et aussi (si vous n'y etes
pas
inscrit deja) que vous faites appelle pour rejoindre le reseau Leica
Professional. Ca vaut la peine et augment le vitesse de reparation...
>
>>> Je vous conseiller aussi de visiter L-camera forum...
>>> (http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/leica-m9-forum/
>>> ) Vous y trouverez des francophones la bas et il y a beaucoup de
>>> bonnes informations...
>> je connaissais, mais les questions en français trouvent
>> rarement de l'écho... et le niveau technique n'est
>> malheureusement pas très élevé, malgré la gentillesse des
>> interlocuteurs.
>>
>
Oui! MAIS j'ai appris des choses la bas ...
>
>>> Bon courage!
>>> Chris
>>
>> Il en faut, en effet...
>> merci en tout cas !
>> (à propos, quelle est votre fonction chez adobe ? Puis-je
>> reprendre contact avec vous lors de mes prochaines
>> découvertes ?) Amitiés, Alain
>>
Encore une fois - bon courage..
>
Dr Christopher Tribble
MOBILE     || +44 (0)7917 473522
EMAIL     || mailto:[email protected]
WEB     || www.ctribble.co.uk
>

ACR 8.7 has been released with support for the Nkon D750. Why no Lightroom support yet?

ACR 8.7 has been released with support for the Nkon D750. Why no Lightroom support yet? Am I wrong or was support for the D810 available far more quickly?

ACR 8.7 has not yet been released. The ACR 8.7RC has been released. It is a Release Candidate - and as such, is not a final version. I wouldn't be concerned about a lack of Lightroom support until a final version is released.
Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 8.7 Release Candidate | digital camera raw file support - Adobe Labs

I am trying to download a free trial of photoshop for my macbook pro and it says there is an error and that the requirements for the new version is not supported for the mac I have. I have looked at the list of requirements but have no idea how to tell wh

I am trying to download a free trial of photoshop for my macbook pro and it says there is an error and that the requirements for the new version is not supported for the mac I have. I have looked at the list of requirements but have no idea how to tell what I do and do not have?

Apple Menu --> About this Mac.
Mylenium

When is LR5 going to add support for the Lumix DMC-LX100?

Is there a date for the release of LR support for the Lumix DMC-LX100?

Anyone who knows is not allowed to say. And anyone who gives you a date doesn't know. Adobe doesn't make announcements about new versions in advance.

SP1 to R2 Upgrade - The installed Version of SQL Server is not supported for the operational database

Hello,
Am trying to upgrade a SCOM SP1 environment to SCOM R2( 3 MGT servers, 1 GW and 2 Web console boxes )
The prerequisites are failing and it is stating the following ;
Operational Database SQL Version Check - The installed Version of SQL Server is not supported for the operational database
Data Warehouse SQL Version Check - The installed Version of SQL Server is not supported for the data warehouse
The SQL servers are running SQL 2012 SP1 64 Enterprise, which is compatible.
All other pre-upgrade tasks have been done.
Help appreciated!

I'm having the exact same issue, I believe. I think that Tubble has problem with SCOM 2012. Not 2007.
I've checked the compatibility list for both SCOM 2012 SP1 and R2. All newer Windows Server and SQL versions are supported. We're running the SQL 2012 SP1 x64 Standard edition on a Windows Server 2012 Standard.
I even tried to move the database from SQL 2012 to an older SQL 2008 R2, but that's not supported either. Only upgrading. Not downgrading.
So, I started checking the opsMgrSetupWizard.log file for clues. And the error message was there as well. But the reason why it says not supported is that it can't get the info about the OS version, so I guess it assumes the OS version is to low. The RPC
service can not be reached.
[10:29:11]: Error: :GetRemoteOSVersion(): Threw Exception.Type: System.Runtime.InteropServices.COMException, Exception Error Code: 0x800706BA, Exception.Message: The RPC server is unavailable. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x800706BA)
[10:29:11]: Error: :StackTrace: at System.Runtime.InteropServices.Marshal.ThrowExceptionForHRInternal(Int32 errorCode, IntPtr errorInfo)
at System.Management.ManagementScope.InitializeGuts(Object o)
at System.Management.ManagementScope.Initialize()
at System.Management.ManagementObjectSearcher.Initialize()
at System.Management.ManagementObjectSearcher.Get()
at Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.OperationsManager.Setup.Common.SetupValidationHelpers.GetRemoteOSVersion(String remoteComputer)
[10:29:11]: Debug: :IsSQLOnAValidComputer: remote OS version string was null or empty.
[10:29:11]: Error: :Error:IsValidSQLVersionCheck: SqlServer OS version is too low.
[10:29:11]: Debug: :**************************************************
[10:29:11]: Error: :<![CDATA[CheckPrerequisites: Logic Type:and IsValidOMDBSQLVersionCheck: 2]]>
[10:29:11]: Error: :
[10:29:11]: Error: :CheckPrerequisites: OMDBSqlVersionCheckTitle: Failed
[10:29:11]: Error: :
[10:29:11]: Debug: :**************************************************
[10:29:33]: Error: :GetRemoteOSVersion(): Threw Exception.Type: System.Runtime.InteropServices.COMException, Exception Error Code: 0x800706BA, Exception.Message: The RPC server is unavailable. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x800706BA)
[10:29:33]: Error: :StackTrace: at System.Runtime.InteropServices.Marshal.ThrowExceptionForHRInternal(Int32 errorCode, IntPtr errorInfo)
at System.Management.ManagementScope.InitializeGuts(Object o)
at System.Management.ManagementScope.Initialize()
at System.Management.ManagementObjectSearcher.Initialize()
at System.Management.ManagementObjectSearcher.Get()
at Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.OperationsManager.Setup.Common.SetupValidationHelpers.GetRemoteOSVersion(String remoteComputer)
[10:29:33]: Debug: :IsSQLOnAValidComputer: remote OS version string was null or empty.
[10:29:33]: Error: :Error:IsValidSQLVersionCheck: SqlServer OS version is too low.
[10:29:33]: Debug: :**************************************************
So, in our case this was just a FW that was blocking some high ports between management server and SQL. I believe TCP port 135 also needs to be open.
Let's hope this fixes your issue as well, Tubble.
Have a great day!

Is XA transactions supported for the SOA Suite 10.1.3.4 on weblogic platfor

There are 2 weblogic domains 1 & 2. Domain 1 hosts the JMS queue and domain 2 hosts the BPEL process. The BPEL process in domain 2 uses JMS adapter to get messages from domain 1. With queues on Weblogic domain 1, is XA transactions supported for the SOA suite 10.1.3.4 BPEL process JMS Adapter on weblogic domain 2?

There are 2 weblogic domains 1 & 2. Domain 1 hosts the JMS queue and domain 2 hosts the BPEL process. The BPEL process in domain 2 uses JMS adapter to get messages from domain 1. With queues on Weblogic domain 1, is XA transactions supported for the SOA suite 10.1.3.4 BPEL process JMS Adapter on weblogic domain 2?

Implementing Single Sign-On support for the Oracle E-Business suite

Implement Single Sign-On support for the Oracle E-Business suite
I want implement Single Sign-On support for the Oracle E-Business suite.
Operationg System : linux/Solaris
Oracle E-Business suite : 11.5.10
Oracle Application Server : 10gAS(latest availble)
Type of integration : SSO and OID with 11i
No third party SSO or LDAP
Qusetions
1.If my SSO Server is down can i login to applications(11i) using normal mode(default login http://servername.xxxx.com:8000/).
2. Is it possible to have appilications (11i) in Linux/Solaris and 10gAS in windows.
Please answer...
NOTE:
I am following Oracle METALINK Doc.Id 233436.1 and 261914.1.
Thank you.
MARK

You couldn't login into server But You can use the following login
http://servername.xxxx.com:8000/AppsLocalLogin.jsp
For this you need to enable the Appslocallogin Profile option

[Consolidation-Locked] Please add RAW support for the Nikon D600 to Lightroom as soon as possible!

My Fair Adobe,
Please add RAW support for the Nikon D600 to Lightroom as soon as possible!
ViewNX lets me get to the images, but come on!!! I know Lightroom, and you, ViewNX, are no Lightroom.
Yes, I see everyone else ASKING for D600 support. I'm here to beg for it! Don't make me wait much longer!
Message title was edited by: Brett N
Message title was edited by: Brett N

Rob, my reading of your site is that this plug-in copies settings from raw to jpeg, does it work the other way around as well?
Rob Cole wrote:
One of the great things about the new 0-based defaults and linear tone curve is:
You can develop the jpegs now, in Lightroom, and then sync the settings to the raws later (e.g. using RawPlusJpeg), and provided you select a matching camera profile, they will look almost the same (white balance won't translate over, but everything else will, more or less). Beware lens corrections applied to the raws might alter the registration of precision local adjustments.
Note: I recommend shooting with ADL off in order for this to work better, and consider turning sharpening off in camera as well, and noise reduction and everything else to whatever extent is possible.
Rob

Retrospect support for the OPTIARC DVD RW AD-7170A

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for