Return not fully processed?

I ordered the MacBook Pro with Retina Display at the base specifications for $2,199 with a $200 student discount, making the base price $1,999.99. Following taxes and shipping ($15.90 for faster shipping), the total price of the computer was $2,134.84 charged to my VISA. I also added the Back-to-School gift card, which should have been a price of $100, but that $100 should have automatically been deducted. It was not. When I asked for a refund on that part of the order, the representative who assisted me refunded me $106.00 – which covered the cost of the card and an additional $6.00; but when I returned the MacBook Pro that I had ordered at the Apple Store location, I was only refunded for a total of $2,134.84; which was the price of only the MacBook (with the appropriate shipping and taxes). At this point, the total returns processed on my account were $2,134.84; but I should have been refunded a total of $2,234.84, including the $100 for the gift card.

I already contacted them on the phone and they were unable to help me. If there's any way that I could get in contact with them digitally to explain the situation in "plain text" as it were so there's no miscommunication, that would be helpful, but apparently there is not. Apple put the blame on my bank, and my bank put the blame on Apple; meanwhile I'm still out of $100.

Similar Messages

Idoc WPUWBW: Status 51 - IDoc not fully processed

Hi All!
Hi All!
This is regarding Goods Moment.
In Quality, Idoc is successfully generated at POSDM system and also in ECC system.
In Production, Idoc is successfully generated at POSDM, but in ECC it is failed (Idoc WPUWBW: Status 51-IDoc not fully processed).
So, at WPER it is showing as In deficit of stock. But stock is available.
Kindly suggest me how to close this issue.
Note: PFA Below. Its the screenshot of the error at WPER.
With Regards,
Yarnagula Sudhir.

Dear Venu
Difficult to answer with this limited information. If you share some more info will be easier to help
regards
Manish

External Email address in process chain alerting not fully displayed

Friends,
I have this weird problem and not sure if its a real issue.
I am maintaining messages for process chain failure alerting. I am using an external address and receipant type as "via Internet".
When I enter email id (ex: abc.123.xyz at mycompany.xxx) save it and come back, and If I re enter that screen the entered email is not fully displayed, few chars are truncated, (ex : abc.123.xyz@mycompan).
Can you guys please help me figure out what the issue is?
Is there any restriction on the length?
Thanks
vijay

please dont bother...

Return code (SY-SUBRC) for the EXCEPTION will not be processed

Hi,
when I was doing the EPC check i have approached this messgae.
Return code (SY-SUBRC) for the EXCEPTION will not be processed after CALL FUNCTION
'CU_READ_RGDIR'
(You can turn off this check by setting all EXCEPTIONS to 0)
(The message can be hidden with "#EC *)
Any pointers on how to handle this.
Regards
Rohini.

Hi Rohini,
Try doing something like this.
TYPE-POOLS: hrpay.
DATA: w_pernr              TYPE          p0000-pernr ,
      w_buffer             TYPE          hrpay_buffer,
      w_no_authority_check TYPE          xfeld       ,
      w_molga              TYPE          t500l-molga ,
      t_in_rgdir           TYPE TABLE OF pc261.
CALL FUNCTION 'CU_READ_RGDIR'
EXPORTING
    persnr             = w_pernr
    buffer             = w_buffer
    no_authority_check = w_no_authority_check
IMPORTING
    molga              = w_molga
TABLES
    in_rgdir           = t_in_rgdir
EXCEPTIONS
    OTHERS             = 0.

ITunes Store does not fully appear on screen

The iTunes store does not fully "load" on screen. It takes 2-3 minutes for just a few images to appear and then it stops. Everything else about iTunes is functioning completley well as are all of my other internet connections/processes. This problem has existed for around one month and we have upgraded to iTunes 9. Please help !

Perhaps try the iTunes Store loads partially or returns "Error 306" or "Error 10054" section in the Specific Conditions and Alert Messages: (Mac OS X / Windows) section of the following document:
iTunes: Advanced iTunes Store troubleshooting

Return To Vendor process

Hi ,
Currently the business use two different process for sending parts to Vendor.
1. First is the standard Sub contracting process where Raw materials is send to vendor ( 541 ) and vendor process the material and sends back ( 543 ) .
2. Second is where the parts are send to Vendor due to defect ( 541) and vendor will either send the material back after fixing ( 542 )or will inform to make credit memo if the parts send cannot be fixed . Althougth this process can be done from Return to Vendor process ( 122 ) , but the business had issues with open PO line item for the return part and raising the Credit memo as Vendor may sometime take time to return the part which may be in months . Also there is no way for the business to know how much of material is lying with vendor at given point of time which is possible by ME20 in this case.
The material planning is such that it consider the Stock at Vendor for Scope of check and hence for the first process this works out properly as it considers stock qty at Vendor's place berfore generating PR , but for second process this becomes the issue as it also considers this stock at vendor place and does planning , but it should not coz this is part return to vendor for fixing and will come again not as assembly .
How best the 2nd process be mapped without the 122 movement and is there any movement type which can take care of the second process and also we can have a seperate MRP planning accordingly .
Regards,
lawrei

See 11.5.10 RECEIVING OPEN INTERFACE를 통해 RETURN처리하는 방법

Creative Zen Vision M not fully charging

(Creative Zen Vision M not fully charging( Hi, I recently bought a refurbished ZVM that doesnt seem to charging properly. When I first got it, it hadnt been charged in quite some time so the battery was overdead. My PC couldnt detect it when I connected it via usb and it didnt even start charging at all. I then connected it to a wall charger and it finally started charging. The strange thing is it never fully charges. I've charged it twice now, both times for at least about 2 hours, and the battery doesnt go more than 50%. And when I connect it to my PC to transfer songs, instead of resuming its charge, my battery runs out. Is this a case of a faulty battery? I li've in Australia and I bought it from the USA. I would prefer not to go through the trouble of returning it if I could. Anything I should do like leaving it to charge for an even longer time? Also one more thing I should mention. When I remove the wall charger and plug it back in, it takes the ZVM sometime to detect it, about 30 minutes or so, and start charging again. Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

I have the exact same problem. I just mailed mine in for repair today.

Updating the material moving average price in return to vendor process

Hello,
Our finance department is saying that the affect on the moving average price in our return to vendor process is wrong.
At the moment the moving average price is changed according to the material price in the return PO.
Our financial department says that the moving average price shouldn't be affected at all by a return to vendor.
Can someone tell me how to customize the system according to this request?
Thanks,
Sivan

Dear Friend,
In COOIS Report or MB51 report, Select the list as Documented goods movement and in production order field give the production order number and execute. After executing, if any goods receipt has been done for the same than system will show the same with these it will also show the value of the same. If its not showing than go to change layout and select the same.
Thanks and Regards,
Jitendra Chauhan

Debit Memo in Return to Vendor Process

Hi!
What is the best practice for creation of the debit memo in the Return to Vendor process?
Is it created from A/P, or is it created from SD (with reference to the outbound delivery)?
Thanks,
Anisha.

Hi,
Return to the vendor,
If u have done MIRO, then credit memo has to be raised for the qty & price that has to be returned
otherwise directly u can send returns if u have not done MIRO
thanks

Messages not being processed

Hi,
I experience an issue with 10g soa, about not having processed some messages sent to receive activities of my process.
I have my process deployed, I can initiate the instance of the process, I can move the flow of the process by calling some receive activities, but sometimes it seems it stucks on one of these receives. It happens randomly on various processes on various receive activities, like one day one receive operation doesn't proceed at all, and on another day it is another receive operation, and that is without any change to the process and redeployment.
I can see the message has been received by server, because I can query it from DLV_MESSAGE table from BPEL data source, and i see its STATE = 0, which is unprocessed. I am also sure that message has valid content and the correlation bits on the message are also correct, really there is no reason why such message should not be processed, it always worked until the moment it decides not to for unknown reason.
My question:
1. What causes messages to be not processed?
2. What are known options to deal with this situation?
Currently I am in a condition where I can spot unprocessed messages, which is fine, so I am aware of the problem, but I am not able to deal with the problem. Even if I tried to submit the message via BPEL Console, it was not processed either.
Thank you for any suggestions

Some blog information to support this case
http://soacrux.blogspot.com/2010/08/automatic-recovery-program-for-pending.html
Content repaste:
Automatic recovery program for pending BPEL call back messages
BPEL engine maintains all async call back messages into database table called dlv_message. You can see such all messages in BPEL console call-back manual recovery area.The query being used by bpel console is joined on dlv_message and work_item tables.This query simply picks up all call back messages which are undelivered and have not been modified with in certain threshold time.
Call-back messages are processed in following steps
BPEL engine assigns the call-back message to delivery service
Delivery service saves the message into dlv_message table with state 'UNDELIVERED-0'
Delivery service schedules a dispatcher thread to process message asynchronously
Dispatcher thread enqueues message into JMS queue
Message is picked up by MDB
MDB delivers the message to actual BPEL process waiting for call-back and changes state to 'HANDLED=2'
So given above steps, there is always possibility that message is available in dlv_message table but MDB is failed in delivering it to BPEL process which keeps message always in state= 0.
Following program can be tailored to suite one's own requirements to recover from such state-0 messages.
Note:- This program contains logic to recover from invocation and call-back messages. Please comment out appropriately.
package bpelrecovery;
import com.oracle.bpel.client.*;
import com.oracle.bpel.client.util.SQLDefs;
import com.oracle.bpel.client.util.WhereCondition;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Hashtable;
import java.util.List;
import javax.naming.Context;
public class bpelrecovery {
public bpelrecovery() {
public static void main(String[] args) {
bpelrecovery recover = new bpelrecovery();
String rtc = "";
try{
rtc = recover.doRecover();
catch (Exception e){
e.printStackTrace();
rivate void recoverCallbackMessages(List messages)
throws Exception
String messageGuids[] = new String[messages.size()];
for(int i = 0; i < messages.size(); i++)
ICallbackMetaData callbackMetadata = (ICallbackMetaData)messages.get(i);
String messageGuid = callbackMetadata.getMessageGUID();
messageGuids[i] = messageGuid;
System.err.println((new StringBuilder()).append("recovering callback message =
").append(messageGuids).append(" process
[").append(callbackMetadata.getProcessId()).append("(").append(callbackMetadata.getRevisionTag()).ap
pend(")] domain [").append(callbackMetadata.getDomainId()).append("]").toString());
Locator locator = getLocator();
IBPELDomainHandle domainHandle = locator.lookupDomain();
domainHandle.recoverCallbackMessages(messageGuids);
public String doRecover() throws Exception{
// Connect to domain "default"
try{
System.out.println("doRecover() instantiating locator...");
Locator locator = getLocator();
System.out.println("doRecover() instantiated locator for domain " +
locator.lookupDomain().getDomainId());
// look for Invoke messages in need of recovery
StringBuffer buf1 = new StringBuffer();
WhereCondition where = new WhereCondition(buf1.append(SQLDefs.IM_state).append( " = "
).append(IDeliveryConstants.STATE_UNRESOLVED ).toString() );
System.out.println("doRecover() instantiating IInvokeMetaData... with where = "+ where.getClause());
IInvokeMetaData imd1[] = locator.listInvokeMessages(where);
System.out.println("doRecover() instantiated IInvokeMetaData");
// iterate thru the list
List l1 = new ArrayList();
for (Object o:imd1){
l1.add(o);
// See how many INVOKES are in the recovery zone
System.out.println("doRecover() instantiated IInvokeMetaData size = " +l1.size());
// look for Callback messages in need of recovery
StringBuffer buf = new StringBuffer();
where = new WhereCondition(buf.append(SQLDefs.DM_state).append( " = "
).append(IDeliveryConstants.TYPE_callback_soap ).toString() );
System.out.println("doRecover() instantiating ICallbackMetaData... with where = "+
where.getClause());
ICallbackMetaData imd[] = locator.listCallbackMessages(where);
System.out.println("doRecover() instantiated ICallbackMetaData");
// recover
List l = new ArrayList();
for (Object o:imd){
l.add(o);
recoverCallbackMessages(l);
catch (Exception e){
e.printStackTrace();
return "done";
public Locator getLocator(){
System.out.println("getLocator() start");
Locator locator = null;
// set JNDI properties for BPEL lookup
String jndiProviderUrl = "opmn:ormi://localhost:6003:oc4j_soa/orabpel";
String jndiFactory = "com.evermind.server.rmi.RMIInitialContextFactory";
String jndiUsername = "oc4jadmin";
String jndiPassword = "welcome1";
Hashtable jndi = new Hashtable();
jndi.put(Context.PROVIDER_URL, jndiProviderUrl);
jndi.put(Context.INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY, jndiFactory);
jndi.put(Context.SECURITY_PRINCIPAL, jndiUsername);
jndi.put(Context.SECURITY_CREDENTIALS, jndiPassword);
jndi.put("dedicated.connection", "true");
try{
System.out.println("getLocator() instantiating locator...");
locator = new Locator("default", "welcome1", jndi);
System.out.println("getLocator() instantiated locator");
catch (Exception e){
System.out.println("getLocator() error");
e.printStackTrace();
return locator;

Certain existing and newly saved photos are not fully loading..

I'm not sure if this is a result of the update, or related to a recent application I may have downloaded that interfaces with the photo library and/or camera (face melter™ or camera bag™)..
it also may be a result of the 2.2 update..
Here are some screencaps showing the issue.
First one, this is a photo that I have hosted that I took with my DLSR, I saved it to my phone via the touch and hold saving process, early on in my phones existance as you can see from the 60 of 600something, and it appears nice and clear(aside from the slight compression from e-mailing myself a screencap)
http://randy.mainevwscene.com/images/screenshot1.jpg
now here is a screencap of me visiting the hosted photo on safari today.. it also appears nice and clear
http://randy.mainevwscene.com/images/screenshot2.jpg
I held my finger on the photo, and have now been prompted to save (still clear)
http://randy.mainevwscene.com/images/screenshot3.jpg
and now here is a screencap of the photo I just saved in my photo library. It is obviously blurry... now all photos will do this for a split second while they load, but its as if its not fully loading the file when I view it.
http://randy.mainevwscene.com/images/screenshot4.jpg
Has anybody else experienced this or is it just me?
Message was edited by: thelumpya2

after messing around for a while, I figured out the chriteria that causes the blurry photos... I have no idea why however..
it is without a doubt related to the photos resolution... any photo that is of the resolution 800x533 or vertically 533x800 is having this blurry effect..
I found a random photo on google image search with a resolution of 800x533 of a lambo.. I saved it to my phone, and here's a screencap of the photo saved to my phone.
http://randy.mainevwscene.com/images/screenshot5.jpg
I then saved that photo to my computer, opened up photoshop and changed the resolution from 800x533 to 798x532 (constraining porportions) and then hosted the photo on my website.. Then I visted the hosted photo's URL on my iphone with safari and saved this image (798x532).. Here is a screencap.. you can see the difference clearly..
http://randy.mainevwscene.com/images/screenshot6.jpg

SOAP to proxy scenarion error An error occurred during the processing of proxy E 00 001 The message can not be processed in plugin mode HTTP

Hi all
My scenario is soap to proxy scenario .while testing using soap to proxy i am getting " An error occurred during the processing of proxy E 00 001 The message can not be processed in plugin mode HTTP: in sxmb_moni sap pi .
Some times this interface is failing and some time its successfully processing.
While testing with successful xml data also i am getting the same error in sxmb_moni.
I modified the proxy inbound code where passing error message and still i am getting the same message.
Please suggestion the same for error solving.
Regards
Ravi.

Hi,
I'm facing the same problem.
I wrote an very easy report. It works as intended, but when i set fillable='X' i get the error FPRUNX 001.
FP_GET_LAST_ADS_TRACE return following:
Begin operation:
Render, elapsed time = 16 ms.
#   End operation: Render, elapsed time = 89 ms.
#   Begin operation: UsageRights, elapsed time = 89 ms.
#   End operation: UsageRights, elapsed time = 97 ms.#
...and the error string of FP_GET_LAST_ADS_ERRSTR is:
ADS: Request start time: Wed Jul 01 14:44:26 CEST 2009(200.101).
Any idea what the problem might be?

SQL Developer 3.2/4EA1 not fully reading TNSNAMES

Hi,
We are using both 3.2 and the 4EA1 versions, and have found that both are not fully reading the TNSNAMES file.
In the TNSNAMES file, we have databases that are configured with either SID or SERVICENAME.
It isn't excluding databases setup with either.
Can anyone suggest what the issue might be?
Cheers,
Russell H.

This is just a shot in the dark, but have you checked your tnsnames file to see if anything besides the entry name (and commented lines) begins in column one? Although sqlplus will usually parse such entries successfully, some of the other tools have had issues with them in the past... they seem to misparse the entry, which often messes up the processing of subsequent items.
Here's a quick example, with spaces replaced by periods for readability:
# good entry
mydb=
..(DESCRIPTION=
....(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=myhost)(PORT=1521))
....(CONNECT_DATA=(SERVICE_NAME=myservice))
# bad entry
mydb=
(DESCRIPTION=
..(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=myhost)(PORT=1521))
..(CONNECT_DATA=(SERVICE_NAME=myservice))
If memory serves, only the entry name is actually supposed to begin in column 1... pretty sure I found that documented somewhere, back when I first encountered the issue. So if this is indeed your problem, I suspect that the official verdict would be that your tnsnames file is bad and needs to be corrected.
Again, this is just a wild guess.

Migrating Not fully paid and Onhold invoices

Hi All,
we are reimplementing R12 from 11i and the requirement like need to migrate the "NOT FULLY PAID INVOICES" and "INVOICES ON HOLD". Can any one suggest me the process to do it. Please provide me the process or any PL/SQL packages available to do it or any reusable scripts to acheive this. The requirement is these type of invoices should migrated to new instance as it is.
Edited by: 901928 on Dec 28, 2011 4:30 AM

Hi,
In case of a re-implementation, the process to be followed for any data migration is similar to that of a Go Live Cut-over from legacy system. However, in this case legacy is the R11 instance. The general process that is followed for migration of partly paid invoices is to migrate the unpaid amount only. The original invoice amount may be put in either description or any other narration/DFF. We had followed this approach for a customer and it was well accepted.
We analyzed the option of bringing original invoice amount and found out that it would require bringing the associated payments and associated credit/debit notes. this meant bringing in a whole lot of data that was closed before.
Regards,
Udit

IDOC status 52 - Document not fully posted

Hi all,
On transferring HR data from R/3 to CRM shows two IDOCs, one which is posted- status 53, and the other with status 52 - document not fully posted. IDOC details show that central person for employee and relationships could not be created. The org. structure is replicated but employees are not.
Now there seems to be a reason behind this, this is the second time I am having problems with IDOCs during HR/CRM integration I have had the same problem when earlier a system client copy was taken and faced the IDOC transfer problem in the copied client. In fresh installations the integration works fine. Are there any system buffers to be refreshed or anything else on the technical side or am I missing settings on the CRM side ?
Please help ASAP.
Regards.
PS: the RFC's are working fine as well and already gone through note 550055

Dear Haseeb,
Thanx for your quick response.
For an employee(18730) 1st idoc has been generated on 03.06.2013 from ECC to CRM with these infotypes data (0,1,105) but idoc status is 52, and again changed on 04.06.2013 infotype (2) and idoc hase been generated but status is 52 in CRM and same again changed on 06.06.2013 infotype (6) and idoc hase been generated but status is 52 in CRM. But still Business partner has not been created in CRM.
We are facing for few employees related this issue.
I have been checked SLG1 and WE02 in both ECC & CRM, Please find the attached screen shots for your kind reference.
Please let me know is any other process to solve my issue.
Thanks & regards
Rajasekhar S

Return not fully processed?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for