Returning damage parts should not effect costing

Hi
I have creared one maintenance Order. I issued one spare material like bearing through the order. Actual cost on the order is Rs 200.
Now I want to return the damaged spare i.e. bearing to the store. If I do this through the same order, cost comes Rs-200.
the total cost of order becomes Rs 0.
I want that when I return that damaged spare to store it should not have any implication on the actual cost of the order .
Is it possible w/o using valuation type for the material?
The tick (Not relevant to costing) in the general Data of component tab can be used for this? Though I checked it didnt had any control on the actual cost.
Thanx in advance.

hi ravi ,
while returning the damaged spares post the same in non-valuated stock or spares stock and this will not have any effect on your actual costs
regards
pushpa

Similar Messages

Return Order Qty should not exceed Reference Qty

Hi
The Qty of Ref Billing document is say 10, Return order is done for eg 8 for first time and for same ref document user enters 5 qty, now the total return order qty is 13, but billing doc qty is 10, where in 3qty is exceeded and system just gives a warning message and allows further. In this case how can we Restrict Return order if Qty it exceeded the reference document qty.
I have checked the copy control settings, no use. Please through some Light.
Regards
Praveen Kumar......

Hi
But the problem is, now we have done return sales referring and billing doc qty eg. 10.
Now again if we do return order referring the same billing document,
system will allow to do another Return sales for same 10qty
Is there any where we can control this feature.
Maintain the copy control settings as suggested by the other friends
Mainly Pos/Neg field
While creating the second return order (sales order) referring the already referred billing document system should give some warning message
Check that message in OVAH
I feel some warning msg should come which you have to change to error
Unfortunately i am not in a position to test this
Still if the problem is not solved you need to go for suitable userexit
Normally when you create Returns sales order with reference billing doc in that sales order if you add a new line item which was originally not there in billing doc system will very cooly accept it (not even warning message)
This also has to controlled thro userexit ( this part is not related to your issue but i said this as an information)
Regards
Raja

Condition Value should not effect on Material Price

Dear All
I have created one condition ZLOC - Local Conveyance ( At header Level & Positive ) and assigned in pricing procedure. But while making PO if i put some value against ZLOC condition its effect on my Net Price of Each Item. Price is getting Increased in respective their Quentity Ratio.
E. G ( Before puting ZLOC )
Material No                         Po Qty                       Price
1500000030                           10                            200
1500000031                             1                            100
After Putting ZLOC = 100 at header level
1500000030                           10                            210
1500000031                             1                            200
I want Per Price Should be remain same & Local Conveyane should be added in Net Amount.
Thanks & Regards

HI
CHANGE UR CALCULATION SCHEMA
u have to frame ur schema as per ur requirement
now for ur case make the entry of this condition at last
create a normal pricing procedure then just after last condition give this condition and try
the procedure will be something like this
base amount
excise
cess
hcess
TOTAL
discount (if any ,u can have this condition after base amount also )
freight
total value
ZLOC - Local Conveyance
FINAL total
regards
KI

Hello, my MacBook just fell on the floor and there is a massive smash on the rear aluminum part. Is it fixable? Does the warranty cover this type of damage? If not, how much would it cost me to get it fixed?

Hello, my MacBook just fell on the floor and there is a massive smash on the rear aluminum part. Is it fixable? Does the warranty cover this type of damage? If not, how much would it cost me to get it fixed?
PS: I bought it on the USA, but currently living in Brazil . I guess though there is a apple store in the shopping mall.

Accidental damage is not covered by warranty. As to cost to fix, we can not say as we do not know what internal/external components were damaged. Take the computer to an authorized repair center for assessment and estimate to repair.

How Can I Book cost of damaged Part in Order??

Dear Sir,
Need Your Suggestion regarding settlement of cost for the damaged parts.
We had supplied One assembly to Client with single invoice. During transportation One of the part of that assembly get damaged. Client has sent back only that part back for the repairing and accept rest of the materials.
Which procedure should i follow for the rectification of that damaged parts in SAP and How can i book the cost of the required materials and labour??
Thanks,
Rajnil K Kalola

Hi Rajani
This part returned treated as non valuated stock, as you can't value it as this part of full machine? is it right? or can you identify the Product cost? then value based on it or bought out product then take back with same price as return from Customer? .the addtional rectification/repair cost may treat over head or add to the cost of the part, in case you can sell at higher price.Discuss with MM/PP team and proceed .
Tx
maalik

Process order should not take part in MRP run

Hello Colleagues
I looking for a way how to exclude not released process orders (we have PP-PI) from MD04 report. Not released process order should not take part in MRP run. I was trying to do it using OPJJ for availability check 02 and checking rule PP but I was not able to get result. Could you please help, probably there are other settings?
Best Regards
Eduard

Hi,
Settings in OPJJ will take effect only when you create or release process orders.
As a work around you can try to exclude process order is
1. Create a Storage location and make it not relevant for MRP-OMIR
2. In Material master for the material in MRP assign storage location MRP as 1 (exclude storage location stock)
3. Create the process order, in the GR tab enter the storage location (not MRP relevant)
In the MRP run it will not take the process order into account.
After releasing change the storage location to the normal sotrage location.
In this process flow, the control is with the storage location.
Check it in your sandbox.
Thanks,
JK

Frieght cost should not loaded on inventory

Dear SAPERS,
We have one scenario that, fright charges should not loaded on Inventory account for that material (means fright cost should not added to material price when price control is MAP)
I have copied standard FRC1 conditions and added in my pricing procedure and static is marked, in condition accruals also marked.
Account key FRE and Accruals FR1 is given and G/L accounts maintained OBYC for TE keys also, but fright cost is loading to inventory.
Pricing procedure:
15     0     FRB1     Freight (Value)     1                                      FRE     FR1
16     0     ZFB1     Freight (Value) ACME     1                                 FRE     FR1
17     0     FRC1     Freight/Quantity     1                                      FRE     FR1
18     0     ZFC1     Freight/Quty ACME     1                                      FRE     FR1
Account entries at MIGO
ACME     1     89          131000     Inventory - Raw Mat     119.20     USD
ACME     2     96          211200     Goods Received /Invo     109.20-     USD
ACME     3     50          217300     Freight Clearing Acc     10.00-     USD     G/L account assign to FR1 in OBYC
G/L account 217301 is assigned to FRE in OBYC, but no account entries coming here the fright and materials cost is loading to Inventory account 131000.
Please suggest how to post fright cost to FRE account.
Thanks in advance,
Venkat
Edited by: Venkat.mm.sap on Mar 15, 2011 2:13 PM

hi sap gurus,
very late to reply..but, below is the solution for NON-INVENTORIED FREIGHT CONDTION in MM pricing condition :
OPTION 1 :
           >> copy FRA1 std cond to new cond.
           >> Put condition category - Blank & tick mark accrual.
           >> Add new cond in pricing procedure. Do not put accrual in pricing proc.
OPTION 2 :
           >> copy FRA1 std cond to new cond.
           >> Put condition category – B & do not tick mark accrual
           >> Add new cond in pricing procedure & tick mark statistical (Accruals-can/can not be put. No effect)
          >> You can add Freight vendor in PO as condition category is B
pls try this & reply.
Regds,
nilesh

Newbie: Method should or should not have side effects

Hi experts,
What does it really mean when I read for the InputVerifier class that the method 'shouldYieldFocus' can have side effects but the method 'verify' should not have side effects.
Thanks for you comments.
tuckie

I am but a newbie only asked to learn and maintain. The reason I ask about side effects is that the shouldYieldFocus() method is invoked twice for the same tab key event. When the tab key (or mouse click) wants to move focus to another input the current input's shouldYieldFocus() is invoked, it in turn invokes verify() which validates data returning true or false and checks to see if a warning should be issued that the data is legal but high. If the data is not high it also returns true and the focus is yielded. Also shouldYieldFocus() is only invoked once. It is when the data is high and the showConfirmDialog() is put up that I get the second shouldYieldFocus() invocation. The previous coder put in a de-bouncing mechanism and I think this is where/how the problems with the next field are created. Sometimes the next field's focusLost() is invoked without the operator making any input. The focusLost() does some fill in the blank things that are reasonable only if the operator really wanted not to fill in any data in the field.
Back to my original point, I was wondering if the fact that the verify() method may have a dialog box put up before it returns to shouldYieldFocus() is the kind of thing that shouldn't be done - no side effects. If so then it could be the likely cause of the problem with the next field sometimes being automatically filled in as if it had received a focusLost() event.
tuckie

Billing document should not be cancelled after creating return sales order

Hi All,
Billing document should not be cancelled after creating return sales order with reference to billing document. Please suggest configuration settings on the same.
Sudheer.

Hi,
In SAP, when the sub-sequent document is existing , we can not cancel the preceeding document. Therefore if you want to cancel the billing document you need to calcel the documents which are created with reference to that.
Check and confirm.
Regards,
Ravi Duggirala

My phone is not working because of water damage what should i do?

my phone is not working because of water damage what should i do?

Water damage is not covered - here is some info:
support.apple.com/kb/HT3302
and:
support.apple.com/kb/index?page=servicefaq&geo=United_States&product=iphone
Edit: sorry, forum software glitch - I am unable to post a link, so you'll need to copy/paste above.

Scratchy noise coming from top end of keyboard. Not effecting performance but very noisy and worrying! What is it? Is my computer seriously damaged? Is it easily fixed? Thanks for any help

Scratchy noise coming from top end of keyboard. Not effecting performance but very noisy and worrying! What is it? Is my computer seriously damaged? Is it easily fixed? Thanks for any help

It would be helpful if you were to identify the model of MBP you have.
The noise makers on a MBP are the fan(s), the HDD and the optical drive. Can you locate the exact position where the noise is coming from?
Ciao.

How to set MM02 should not allow to change account and costing view

Hi all guru's
How to set MM02 should not allow to change account and costing view details for orher users expect me,plz help me
thanks
ramesh

Hi Ramesh,
                   Use the Authorization Object: M_MATE_STA     Material Master: Maintenance Statuses
Below are the Views for the MM02, Field STATM
Whichever not wanted to be changed, please dont provide them.
A     Work scheduling
B     Accounting
C     Classification
D     MRP
E     Purchasing
F     Production resources/tools
G     Costing
K     Basic data
L     Storage
P     Forecasting
Q     Quality management
S     Warehouse management
V     Sales
X     Plant stocks
Z     Storage location stocks
Regards,
Yawar Khan
Edited by: 1234_abcd on Jan 10, 2012 8:14 AM

Accounting view is not maintained, costing should not be saved

Dear All,
Please let me know if material's accounting view is not maintained, in that case costing should not be saved. What should be setting for it.
regards

Dear Pari
What Ajay Sir suggested is a check which you should implement to prevent this situation in future, and as golden rule you should follow it.
Now for present situation you can go to MM01 give material code press enter select the views as required press enter and maintain the view and save.
Regards
Rajneesh Saxena

I have created a DVD via iMovie and burned several copies. When played the DVD's will stop and display a message SKIPPING DAMAGED Part. It is not the DVD. When trying to export the project, I get an error message.

I have created a DVD via iMovie and burned several copies. It is a large file. When played the some DVD's will stop and display a message SKIPPING DAMAGED Part but will not resume. Some work fine. It is not the DVD. I have burned from several batches. When trying to export the project, I get an error message with the following message: The project could not be prepared for publishing because an error occured (-108).

TV video typically is copyrighted content. We'd be breaking several rules trying to help you. Good luck!

The product distribution file could not be verified. It may be damaged or was not signed. what should i do ?

The product distribution file could not be verified. It may be damaged or was not signed. what should i do ?

surely the apple firewall does not intercept garageband communication? would temporarily turning firewall off to download/update be a safe option?
regards

Returning damage parts should not effect costing

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for