Returns flow

suppose a returns document is created is with ref to an invoice. can we see the returns flow in the document flow. if so how?????

Hi Kiran,
You can go to VA03 put the return document and then you can see the whole flow of document. Also you find this information from table VBFA.
Kind Regards
Sandeep

Similar Messages

Third party return flow

what should be the return flow of aThird party sales?
Sharmila

As already posted in SDN:
Third Party Return Process
Please check this extract from the sap library :
If the vendor grants you a credit memo on a quantity or a value basis, you can then send this credit memo directly to your customer.
The billing type Third-party credit memo (G2S) is available for this. The billing type Third-party credit memo works with the item category TASG (third-party credit memo item). The Billing-relevance indicator F is set in Customizing for Sales for this item category. This means that the cost is not created. In Customizing for Sales, the item category TASG is set at item level in copying control for the billing type G2S (copying control sales document by billing document) as the target item category (source: TAS-> Target:> TASG.)
Process Flow
Create a billing documente with billing type Third-party credit memo (for further information, see the section Creating a billing document in the Billing document). Enter the third-party order as a document still to be processed. The quantities are automatically removed from the invoice.
The above is the process for giving a credit memo which can be adapted for return goods.

What is the Returns flow in SAP?

I want to know the flow in SAP SD/MM modules in details as how the goods are returned from Store and how are received at DC and then how these are stored in DC (Storage Locations, Movement Types, Reason Codes etc).
Does anyone have any information on this?

Hi,
Incase of Return Sales Order:
T.Code for copy control: VTAF
Source Document: F2
Target Document: RE
Item category REN
Considering the above settings are done:
Create return sales order RE (with Reference to Billing Document) & the data will be copied as it is in Return Sales Order - RE. For Eg: here you require to change to quantity from 10 to 2, as you want to take back into Inventory of only 2.
Incase of Return Delivery:
T.Code for copy control: VTLA
Source Document: RE
Target Document: LR
Item category REN
Considering the above settings are done:
Create Return Delivery through T.Code VL01N & do PGR (Post Goods Receipt). This will add the stock to blocked stock. This will take care of Inventory.
To address the issue of how to take Credit for Excise, use T.Code: J1IH --> other Adjustment & based on the credit to be taken, make the necessary entry.
Incase of Credit Memo:
T.Code for copy control: VTFA
Source Document: RE
Target Document: Credit Memo
Item category G2N (Check in System)
First in VA02, remove the Billing Block in Return Sales Order - RE & save the document. Now in T.Code: VF01, enter Return Sales Order Number & select the appropriate Billing Type (Credit Memo) & Enter& Save. This will create Credit Memo.
Also pls chk this link;
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/dd/56076d545a11d1a7020000e829fd11/frameset.htm
Hope this helps you.
Regards,
CSM Reddy

Scenario Help - Problem in Return Flow from RFC

Dear Expert,
I am new to the XI development. we are on XI 7.0PI. In one of our scenario
we are pulling some info. from Sql database & post some documents in SAP via RFC. in this case RFC returns me the Document No. & some status from SAP which i am suppose to update back the same table row from where i have fetched this information. But the problem is the RFC does not return the Key value which i need to update the SQL table back.
How can i solve this problem without using BPM. I cannot change the RFC since it is not in my hand. ( So that RFC can take the Key Field of SQL & return the same back which i can use in my reverse Mapping. )
Any Global container which can hold this data from Forward Map which i can use in Reverse Map to update this SQL table.??
Pl. Help... Waiting for the reply.
Regards,
Umesh

Hi Sudheer,
From SAP Help,
This object enables you to cache the values that you want to read again when you next call any user-defined function in the <b>same message mapping</b>.
In this case, the mapping programs are different. So there is no way (to my knowledge) of using GC to solve this issue. If the issue has to be solved from XI, my soln would be opting for a lookup in request and response mapping. In request mapping store the keyfield value and in response mapping, retrieve the same. Ofcourse this is <b>not</b> a much recommended way by SAP.
A cleaner soln would be to develop a wrapper RFC (if the original RFC can not be changed) that returns the keyfield value along with the status.
Regards,
Jai Shankar

Free Goods Flow in Return Sales Order

Dear Experts,
I have a question that is how to make the free good item(TANN in order and RENN in returns) flow automatically in the return sales order along with the REN items. Does it involve item category proposal in copy control for billing document to sales document.
Presently free item of preceeding billing document is not getting copied to my return order. Please inform us the config steps for the same.
Thanks in Advance,
Regards
Srini

Hi,
This scenario is not supported by standard SAP.Please go through the OSS notes--549505 or go through the link given below
[Constraints in Free Goods|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/dd/55fa4e545a11d1a7020000e829fd11/frameset.htm]
You may need to go for a Z development to meet your criteria.
Regards,
Phani Prasad

Free good flow in return sales order

Hi all I have a question that is how to make the free good item(TANN in order and RENN in returns) flow automatically in the return sales order along with the REN items. Does it involve item category proposal in copy control for billing document to sales document.

Hi Avishek,
Check your item category assignment first that renn is properly assigned to your
Order type u2013 item category group u2013 usage u2013 item category at higher level.
You can do this from the path
IMG u2013 sales and distribution u2013 sales u2013 sales documents u2013 sales document item u2013 assign item category.
Do this setting first then go copying control with the following path.
IMG u2013 sales and distribution u2013 sales u2013 Maintain copy control for sales document.
Search for your sales document type YDRE from billing document YDF2.
Go to the item level and search for item category used in billing document.
Go to the detail of that item category you will find item category proposal.
Write down over there RENN.
Now try to create the return sales order it will happen.
This setting you have to do so that it will automatically determine in sales order.
Regards
Raj.

Show flows returns a prompt without any flows

CSS11503 running:
CSS11503# sh ver
Version: sg0710206A (7.10 Build 206)
Flash (Locked): 7.10 Build 206
Flash (Operational): 7.10 Build 206
Type: PRIMARY
Licensed Cmd Set(s): Standard Feature Set
When I display a show flows it doesn't return flows. This has happened twice, approx. 2 days after we have rebooted some of the servers that we have configured on the content switch. The only way that I have been able to recover this is to reboot the CSS11503. There hasn't been a change made to the CSS during this period. Any feedback would be helpful.

go in llama mode and do 'flow-agent show active'
Do you see any flow ?
Is this a single box or is it working in redundant mode ?
I would also strongly recommend an upgrade to 7.40 or 7.50.
We don't really support 7.10 anymore.
Gilles.

Return Order with reference to Proforma invoice

Dear All
Is it possible to create a return order with reference to proforma invoice. How ?? if possible.
Our scenario is when we do stock transfer order and truck meets with an accident or anything and material needs to written to the factory premises. we dont want to complete proforma invoice.
Suggestions PLZZ
Regards-
Ram

I don't see any the relevance or logic of creating of return order from proforma invoice.
You can follow - Returns flow:
PO type is same ( Intercompany STO PO type is NB )
While you make this PO there is a return indicator check box at the line item where you will give qty etc (scroll on the rt side)
Tick that
Then save the PO with all other information
There is a configuration Return delivery type has to be assigned
IMG-MM-Purchasing-PO-Returns Order-Return Plant to Plant
Here for your plant you need to assign delivery type as NCR This config is reqd to be done from your end
So, the Flow would be
- ME21N (with returns indicator)
-VL10B
-VL02N (delivery type will be NCR ) & do a PGR here
-VF01 do billing with reference to delivery created
I Category in del will be NCRN & M type will be 673
If you are using standard document types system will pick billing type as IG which is nothing but a intercompany credit memo
Copy controls between NCR and IG in VTFL is already there in standard
For understanding also, refer following link:
return process intercompany stock transfer
Hope this can assist you.
Thanks & Regards
JP

Return statement without parameter

What the return statemet return?
package examples;
import nsga2.MultiObjectiveProblem;
/* Test problem BNH
# of real variables = 2
# of bin variables = 0
# of objectives = 2
# of constraints = 2
public class bnh extends MultiObjectiveProblem{
     public void test_problem (double []xreal, double []xbin, int [][]gene, double []obj, double []constr)
         obj[0] = 4.0*(xreal[0]*xreal[0] + xreal[1]*xreal[1]);
         obj[1] = Math.pow((xreal[0]-5.0),2.0) + Math.pow((xreal[1]-5.0),2.0);
         constr[0] = 1.0 - (Math.pow((xreal[0]-5.0),2.0) + xreal[1]*xreal[1])/25.0;
         constr[1] = (Math.pow((xreal[0]-8.0),2.0) + Math.pow((xreal[1]+3.0),2.0))/7.7 - 1.0;
         return;
}

return does two things: It causes the method to end immediately (returns flow of control to the caller), and it specifies what value will be passed back to the caller (returns the method result to the caller). However, when no value is provided, it does only the first--causes the method to end immediately.

Return material to vendor procured through Third party PO

Hi Friends
We have a scenario where the materials sent to customers through third party sales order is retuned back as retuned stock.
This retuned material needs to be sent back to the vendor. Please let us know how this can be handled.
regards
R.Rajesh

Hi
i have an issue on the way we manage return from third party order but maybe it can help you to know how we proceed
third party order here is treated this way;
sales order with TAS triggering PR and then PO......we do MIGO when good reach customer ..then MIRO and finally customer invoice..ok..nothing really extraordinary !!
for the return we add a new item in the Sales order and then triggers a new PR..we go to our PO with ME22N and create a new item from the PR generated with the second sales order item
We set the return checkbox in the second PO item...and then we do MIGO to indicate that stock has been returned to the supplier ..and create the MIRO to be refunded by the supplier and finally we create a G2S invoice to refund the customer ....
it works good but...the overal status of the sales order remains "Being processed..." !! this is my problem and SAP do not want to help us coz a return flow on third party order is not covered by SAP in standard !
Regards
Laure imberti

Trigger of Import Declaration (Work List) for SO based inbound flows in ECC

Hello Experts,
I am running a feasability study for GTS Customs managment Import. My client is using SO based flows for the return flows (SO-Delivery-Mtrl Document). In order to use local clearance (to avoid VAT and Customs Fee) we need to set this flow up in SAP and enable the doucment transfer from ECC to GTS.
We have come up with a few high level alternatives for the trigger for the GTS Import Declaration. It would be great if you could have a look on them and let us know your thoughts. What is feasible and what is not? Any recommendations?
Alt 1: Create Z program for the RFC call to GTS which basically is a copy of the standard program but it modifies the SO to be perceived as an PO in GTS and the Delivery to be perceived as an Inbound Delivery.
Alt 2: Use the SPL check which is set up in GTS Compliance management. Might be an alternative since the SO and Delivery is transferred to GTS for the SPL check. We should be able to find some user exit or BADI in the SPL check from where we can trigger det SO and Delivery to the Work List in GTS Customs Management.
Alt 3: Integrate the feeder system with GTS as an external system. This will require that we have IDoc outputs from the SO and Delivery on the feeder side and that we activate BAdI for Mapping External Data with or w/o Document Reference in GTS.
Alt 4: Treat the SO import flow as an Export flow in GTS (triggering it through a proforma document on the feeder side) but configure the activity sequence according to the Customs Authorities import specification.
Another question that we have is relating to GTS Inventory Management which we must use in order to use local clearance procedure. Is it possible to set up GTS inventory management without a Customs Warehouse and without configuring the Customs ID on the feeder side? Could it be used with the any of the alternatives above?
Any input is welcomed.
Thank you and best regards
Andreas

You mentioned that you are looking to use local clearance (to avoid VAT and Customs Fee), I read this as using the customs warehouse functionality in GTS.
If you have the customs warehouse set up, you may want to check out the returns order movement type (651) This is what the GTS library says: u201CThe system treats returns orders with returns deliveries (651) in the feeder system just like a receipt posting from a regular goods movement, because you post goods receipts in the feeder system by choosing a goods issue based on an outbound delivery. The customs warehouse handles these postings just like goods receipts, however, and therefore analogous to regular goods movements for customs warehouse receipts, with movement type 101.u201D
So if you have a goods receipt, you can create a entry into the customs warehouse. To get it out, youu2019d need some type of outbound movement. GTS would see this as an issue (reduction) of the customs warehouse. This outbound does not necessarily need a connection with a specific PO.
Also, for customs warehouse, this outbound movement, if it is customs cleared in the country where the customs warehouse is located is a u201Cdomestic movementu201D.
If a material is flagged as batch relevant, you can add a batch reference at the time of PO, or inbound delivery. For sales, you can add at time of SO or goods issue.
This batch number serves as a link for the transaction data. This number allows you to track the materials in a transaction through the purchas/mfg/sale process. Attached to the number can be a great deal of info on the material in the transaction. Through the batch reporting, you can track forwards or backwards all the follow-on transactions associated with the batch.

Re: Export Return

HI Guru,
i have purchase the material via import purchase. i found some of the material are defect. now i want to return that material via export to same vendor. in this flow excise part also exsiste.
please give the details about the return flow for this purchase flow.
thanks
by
siva

Hi Guru,
i need information quickly still i am strucling on this issue.
how i shoule return this material to the vendor from the depot plant.
in this flow excise part also is there.
please give me the details about this.
Best Regards
Thanks
Siva kumar

Intercompany returns

Hi All,
As per SAP standard scenario for intercompany returns flow
1. RE(return order type ) to RE( Invoice) - possible
2. LR(returns delivery type ) to IG(intercompany return invoice type)
But we need --based on delivery both invoices
means -
1. LR to RE (return Inovice type)
2. LR to IG (return intercomopany invoice).
Maintained copy control the same like above ...(LR to RE not exist as per SAP , created like LF to F2)
also maintained return order type in billing section delivery relavent type : RE (return invoice)
while creating invoice error " The document is not relevant for billing"
Let us know the suggestions.
Thanks,
Pradeep

Hi,
Can you tell me why you have copied LF to F2.
You should have copied LR to RE.
Because both should have same functionality.
So if you have copied the LR to RE then this error might not come.
I think so this error is coming because you might have not done the PGR of the return delivery type.
Just do the PGR and try again to create the billing document.
Otherwise remove your setting and copy LR to RE copy control and save this setting.
Regards
Raj.

Bug in Flow layout?

Before I made a JIRA entry, wanted to see if anyone else thought this was a bug. It drove me crazy for days.
It appears that if I initialize a Flow content at the time of creation of the Flow object, all is well. However, if I add content in bulk afterwards, all elements are stacked on top of each other. Other layouts (like HBox seem to work just fine). More interestingly, 'later' if I add or remove elements from the flow, it adjusts its size and positions of everything correctly. Weird.
This works fine:
function createFlow():Flow{
    var flow:Flow = Flow{
         width: 100 hgap: 5 vgap: 10
         content: for (i in [1..5])
         Rectangle { width: 40 height: 40 }
Stage {
    scene: Scene {
        content: [
             createFlow()
}However, this way stacks the rectangles on top of each other for some reason.
function createFlow():Flow{
    var flow:Flow = Flow{
         width: 100 hgap: 5 vgap: 10
     for (i in [1..5])
         insert Rectangle { width: 40 height: 40 } into flow.content;
    return flow;
Stage {
    scene: Scene {
        content: [
             createFlow()
}

Indeed, it sounds as a bug H/VBox had in 1.1.
I can reproduce your problem with JavaFX 1.2 on Windows XP Pro SP3.
The following code works fine too:
Stage {
    scene: Scene {
        content: [
//~             createFlow()
               Flow {
                    width: 100 hgap: 5 vgap: 10
                    content: for (i in [1..5])
                         Rectangle { width: 40 height: 40 }
}but this one fails:
function createFlow(): Flow {
    var flow: Flow = Flow {
        width: 100 hgap: 5 vgap: 10
    var content = for (i in [1..5])
          Rectangle { width: 40 height: 40 };
    flow.content = content;
    return flow;
}Looks like Flow prefers to have its sequence provided at creation time...

Different valuation way in sales and returns of goods

Hi all,
we experience some problems in using, at the same time, the scenario of third-party order processing for sales to the customer and the standard flow to manage the return flow.
As standard the goods entry (movement type 653, special stock E) of a delivery created by a sales order of type RE (return document) is valued at moving price.
We need to valuate the movement 653 at the same value of VPRS condition in the RE order, as we have a lot of materials with a moving price that is changing in a wrong way.
Regards,
Antonino Musciumarra

This is my wsdl
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><wsdl:definitions name="testprojectMS" targetNamespace="http://abcd.org/testprojectMS" xmlns:oldtns1="http://www.xyz.net" xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/" xmlns:tns="http://abcd.org/testprojectMS" xmlns:wsdl="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:mrm1="http://abcd.org/testprojectMS">
<wsdl:types>
<xsd:schema targetNamespace="http://abcd.org/testprojectMS" xmlns:mrm="http://abcd.org/testprojectMS">
<xsd:import namespace="http://www.xyz.net" schemaLocation="testproject.xsd"/>
</xsd:schema>
</wsdl:types>
<wsdl:message name="testproject_in">
<wsdl:part element="oldtns1:testprojectIn" name="testprojectIn"/>
</wsdl:message>
<wsdl:message name="testproject_out">
<wsdl:part element="oldtns1:testprojectOut" name="testprojectOut"/>
</wsdl:message>
<wsdl:portType name="testprojectMSPortType">
<wsdl:operation name="testproject">
<wsdl:input message="tns:testproject_in" name="testproject_Input"/>
<wsdl:output message="mrm1:testproject_out" name="testproject_Output"/>
</wsdl:operation>
</wsdl:portType>
<wsdl:binding name="testprojectMSSOAP_HTTP_Binding" type="tns:testprojectMSPortType">
<soap:binding style="document" transport="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http"/>
<wsdl:operation name="testproject">
<soap:operation soapAction=""/>
<wsdl:input name="testproject_Input">
<soap:body parts="testprojectIn" use="literal"/>
</wsdl:input>
<wsdl:output name="testproject_Output">
<soap:body parts="testprojectOut" use="literal"/>
</wsdl:output>
</wsdl:operation>
</wsdl:binding>
<wsdl:service name="testprojectService">
<wsdl:port binding="tns:testprojectMSSOAP_HTTP_Binding" name="testprojectPort">
<soap:address location="http://myhost/testprojectService"/>
</wsdl:port>
</wsdl:service>
</wsdl:definitions>
Please let me know where it went wromg

Returns flow

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for