Revaluation of actual activity rates

<MODERATOR:  please post in the appropriate forum.>
Dear all,
My client is having make to order scenario in which at the time of production order confirmation (co14) actual activity is confirmned and loaded to production order as per planned acticity rates maintained in kp26
i.e actual activity * planned rate , but when actual costs of activities are debited to cost center for these activities there is under/over absorption in cost centers .So i want to know what is to be done for these absorptions .Through sap help i came to know about revaluation tool at actuals ,but how it is done kindly provide some suggestions or any other method of knocking off over /under absorption so that cost of product should be according to actual activity*actual rate.
Thanks and regards
vijay

Hi Vijay,
I do not have any documentation but I can you the splitting concept one more time. It is more important to understand the concept.
Suppose you have a cost center 1000 that produces 3 activities in a month. You incur lot of expenses in the cost center, say $10,000, out of which $4,000 are fixed costs, which means these costs can not be identified to one particular activity. There are 10 cost elements which contribute to these costs.
The other $6,000 are incurred due to activity 1, 2 and 3. There are 5 cost elements which cause these costs.
Using KP06, you need pair the activity dependent cost elements to the respective activity types and plan the costs.
This way you can separate variable costs from the fixed costs.
Splitting job splits the acitivity independent (fixed) costs to 3 activities in the ratio that you set in KP26. You need to assign equivalence numbers in KP26 for each activity type. Let us say you assigned 1, 3 and 5.
Once you make the above settings, the splitting job will split $4,000 into the 3 activity types into the ratio of 1, 3 and 5.
When you run KSII, activity price is calculated for each activity, which will be the total costs per activity divided by the actual activity output. So, the KP06 costs will be added to the split costs to determine the activity price.
Please try the above concept and the t-codes and settings I mentioned yourself and let me know if you face any problems.
Regards
Sharabh

Similar Messages

  • ACTUAL ACTIVITY RATE CALCULATION

    Hi Gurus,
    Is it possible to calaculate actual activity rate based on plan hours......
    I know that we can splitt the actual cost based on plan hours by selecting splitting rule 22...
    Now im doing actul activity rate calculation through ksii...
    Then system considering actul hours confirmed in production for actual activity calculation.....
    Pls suggest me.
    RAM

    Thank you for prompt reply.
    Suppose this month we have produced only . 10 finished products.... But actual capacity is 20..... What ever cost moniterd by the production cost centers will be loaded on total 10 products only  at the time of revaluation of production orders if we calaculate actul activity rate based on actual hours....... so the cost of the product is getting increased... so that he want to calculate actual rate aslo with planned hours..... Is there any other solution for this..
    Pls suggest me ...... its very urgent.
    Ram

  • Difference between standard and actual activity rates

    Dear All,
    My client is having a process in which while downloading KOB1 the system is giving report of all the process orders wise  activities confirmed in that month against some cost center.
    Now when i am going into line item it takes me to process order confirmation display where activiies to be confirmed and activities yet to be confirmed are displayed.
    After that cost center report S_alr_87013611 is displayed wherein actual rates(quantity ) is displayed for that activities.
    Now the system shows difference between actual and standard activities.
    The difference is the calculated in excel on the basis of KOB1 report and difference is loaded process order wise  on calculation done in excel through LSMW (for transaction KB21n) wherein difference quantity is posted from cost center to process order.
    Now client needs automation in the sense that no excel calculation should be done and difference should be posted for that month for each process order in the ratio calculated in excel.
    Kindly provide any solutions if any, avaliable in standard or Z development has to be done.
    Thanks and Regards,
    VLM

    Dear AP,
    Have you any idea about how in above case Z development is to be done?
    Regards,
    VLM

  • Revaluation of actual prices

    Dear experts,
                    Generally we do price calculation in KSII, that is standard price calculation. After planning in kp06 and kp26 we do this calculation. For actual confirmations also ( in  CO11N ), we use the same price ( that means standard price whatever we calculated in KSPI ). But i have some doubt regarding actual price calculation.  When we do actual price calculation in KSII? when we do actual price revaluation in CON2? what is the use of doing this one? At what point of time we do revaluation? immediately after doing confirmations? Please help me.
    Regards
    Jay

    Hi Jay Jay,
    Pls go through the following example to understand Plan Activity Price and Actual Activity Price:
    For Cost Center A, you do Cost Element Planning in KP06 (Ex. Rs.1,00,000). In KP26, you do the planned Activity Quantity (100 Hrs) - you will not update any price in KP26 screen usually . Now, to calculate the Planned Activity Price, you use the transaction code KSPI. The gives the result of Planned Activity Price of Rs.1000 per Hr.
    Now, when you confirm the activities in Production Order in CO11n, the activity cost on the Production Order is updated with the Planned Price of Rs.1000. So, by the end of the period, if total actual hrs confirmed is 60 Hrs. ie., total cost loaded onto Production Orders is Rs.60,000.
    Now, think of the actual cost that is booked to the Cost Center A (either through FI postings or distribution / assessment from other cost centers). If the actual cost that was posted to that cost center is only Rs.84,000. (Where as Planned Cost was Rs.1,00,000).
    Now, when you run KSII transaction code for actual activity price calculation, the system will calculate the actual activity price by 84,000 / 60 Hrs =1,333.33.
    This is the way how the system clearly shows and takes care of Under-Absorption / Over-Absorption in cost centers.
    Then you run the transaction code MFN1 / CON2 to revaluate your Production Orders with the Actual Price of Activity.
    After alll these steps only, you need to settle the Production Orders. If you settle Production Orders before revaluating with Actual Activity Price, then again there will be some loaded on to Production Orders, so, you have to do the settlement again.
    Revert back for further explanation...
    Srikanth Munnaluri

  • Actual Activity Cost

    Hi Friends
    For calculating the actual rate system take all the actual activity cost and divide it with actual quantity. I want to know how the system is calculating actual activity cost.
    In KSII system will calculate the actual activity rate. What is the backgroung calculation. Or how to find out the actual activity cost per period is XXXX.
    Regards
    Jos
    Edited by: Joji Jose V on Nov 15, 2010 3:58 PM

    Hi Jose
    1. Actual Activity cost means Actual cost posted with cost center and act type in FI postings / Depreciation postings
    however, this is quite rare... To use this, Act Type must be switched in OKKP in Control Indicators
    2. In absence of (1), Actual Actvity cost means Actual cost posted with cost center
    3. If there are more than one act type in a cost center, then KSS2 would split the costs between the act types based on your Splitting rule in OKES... And then these costs would be divided by Actual Act Qty to calculate the Activity price
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • Actual Activity Quantity

    Hi
    Somebody please explain how the actual activity quantity is confirmed on the production order ?

    Hi!
    Different activity types like labor, Machine, Factory Overhead etc.. are defined in the system for different resources (Sterilising, Mixing, Grinding, Packing.....) in the production line.
    Standard Activity rates are defined in KP26 with the combination of Activity type and Cost Center (generally different for each PP Resource - Work Center). Also the same are defined in Master Recipe with standard one.
    When you create production order, system will catch standard rates for machine hour and labor hour which are charged at a predetermined standard rate to be derived. Now when you confirm the PP Order through COR6N, you will put all activity type in actual...say 40  labor hours and 50 machine hours..so based on standard rate defined in KP26 and master recipe, system will calculate actual activity rates.
    Also for some of activity type like factiry overheads or others which are dependent on machine hours or labor hours, for that you have to define formula in your resource based on which system will calculate actual activity rates.
    Hope it will clear to you. Pls get back for further query.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Taral Patel

  • Tcode CON2: Revaluation of Actual price

    Dear Experts
    At the time of running the transaction code CON2, it shows that "Processing completed with no errors",.
    But a list should be generated for the revaluated items, which is not getting generated
    kindly, help me out
    Regards
    Sudhir Poddar

    Hi Jay Jay,
    Pls go through the following example to understand Plan Activity Price and Actual Activity Price:
    For Cost Center A, you do Cost Element Planning in KP06 (Ex. Rs.1,00,000). In KP26, you do the planned Activity Quantity (100 Hrs) - you will not update any price in KP26 screen usually . Now, to calculate the Planned Activity Price, you use the transaction code KSPI. The gives the result of Planned Activity Price of Rs.1000 per Hr.
    Now, when you confirm the activities in Production Order in CO11n, the activity cost on the Production Order is updated with the Planned Price of Rs.1000. So, by the end of the period, if total actual hrs confirmed is 60 Hrs. ie., total cost loaded onto Production Orders is Rs.60,000.
    Now, think of the actual cost that is booked to the Cost Center A (either through FI postings or distribution / assessment from other cost centers). If the actual cost that was posted to that cost center is only Rs.84,000. (Where as Planned Cost was Rs.1,00,000).
    Now, when you run KSII transaction code for actual activity price calculation, the system will calculate the actual activity price by 84,000 / 60 Hrs =1,333.33.
    This is the way how the system clearly shows and takes care of Under-Absorption / Over-Absorption in cost centers.
    Then you run the transaction code MFN1 / CON2 to revaluate your Production Orders with the Actual Price of Activity.
    After alll these steps only, you need to settle the Production Orders. If you settle Production Orders before revaluating with Actual Activity Price, then again there will be some loaded on to Production Orders, so, you have to do the settlement again.
    Revert back for further explanation...
    Srikanth Munnaluri

  • Material ledger activity rate revaluation account determination modification

    Scenario:
    SAP ECC 617
    Material ledger activated with activity rate revaluation (i.e. cost center over/under absorption posts to ML and not to production orders)
    Standard SAP setup has PRV transaction key used to post both multi-level price differences to inventory and to capture the offset to the cost center clearing entries (GBB-AUI) causing the values to get comingled in the same account
    Question:
    For reporting purposes I would like to determine a unique account for the activity rate revaluation entries.  There is no relevant general modifier available for transaction key PRV. Is it possible and practical to modify table T169A for a specific value string / field name combination that represents this material ledger transaction?  If so, what is the combination?  Or will this cause major issues with ML processing?
    I'm trying to find a creative way to fill this gap without account substitution.

    Hi Eric,
    This is an interesting one.
    Modifying value string might be an option but in my opinion is quite a serious "brain surgery" on the system :-).
    You may want to try another option.
    In SPRO -> Controlling -> General Controlling -> Organization -> Maintain Versions
    for version 0, Controlling Area Settings, Settings for Each Fiscal Year in tab Price Calculation there is field Revaluation.
    One of the options there is 'Own business transaction'. With this option posting to sending Cost Centre resulting from actual activity price revaluation will be posted with different Business Transaction (although same secondary cost element as original activity allocation).
    In reports you can separate postings based on Business transaction.
    It definitely works for Activity Update 1 (revaluation of production orders).
    I'm not sure if it works for Activity Udate 2 (no revaluation of production orders).
    Please let us know the results of your investigation.
    Regards,
    Szymon

  • Actual activity allocation / revaluation

    Hi All,
    My company is using SAP ISH (healthcare) in order to book Services to patient cases.  We have linked the Services to some activity types which are generated by the Performing Unit in ISH.  The Performing unit is linked to a cost centre in CO where the planned Activity rate has been set up (KP26).  The patient case is linked 1:1 with an internal order in CO which receives the activity posting.
    My company would like to ensure that all of the costs relevant to these activities are allocated out of the cost centre on to the receiving internal orders at month end.  I have not worked in CO for a few years but I believe that this will involve a couple of steps in the month end process.
    1 Re-calculate the actual activity prices
    2 Revalue the actual postings
    Each cost centre generates 2 or more activities which need to be valued.  Example below
    Performing unit THEATRE1 - Operating theatre, performs operations on 2 patient cases
    CASE1 - Knee replacement
         Activity type - Consumables = 100 units @ £2ea = £200
                              Drugs = 10 units @ £30ea = £300
    CASE2 - Hip Replacement
         Activity type - Consumables = 200 units @ £2ea = £400
                              Drugs = 50 units @ £30ea = £1500
    Total credit to the THEATRE1 cost centre
    Consumables - £600
    Drugs - £1800
    At month end the actual costs posted to the cost centre are as follows
    Consumables - £800
    Drugs - £2000
    In order to credit the full amount to the Internal orders from the cost centre the prices must be recalculated and the activity allocation transactions need to be revalued.
    Can you please confirm the steps to configure the month end price calculation (specifically around the splitting rule on the cost centre to determine which costs belong to which activity type), and steps to process the revaluation of the transactions?
    Many thanks
    Phil

    Hi Philip,
    When u work with cost center independent planning system can't underunderstand which GL account and cost center should plan with respective activity. For that reason  we create splitting structures.
    Cost center splitting is used in Cost Center Independent Planning where in KP06 you have cost center and cost element only. In this screen, you will not find Activity.
    So, to give a relationship between Cost center, cost element, and activity, we will do splitting structure in OKES, and assign it to cost center in OKEW.
    When you do KSS2, it will split the costs based on the splitting structure between activities and cost centers.
    In this case, you have to maintain qty values in KP26 and later do KP06.
    E.g.: we have 3 cost elements:
    Salary - 100000
    Depreciation - 200000
    Electricity - 100000
    Total = 400000
    Activities:
    Labour - 500 hrs
    Machine - 1000 hrs
    Total = 1500 hrs.
    Here, when u calculate per hour rate system wi'll consider total amount / total activity hours.
    = 400000/1500 = 226 INR/per hour
    Here, if you want to consider salary amount only with Labour hours and deprecation and electricity for machine hours. 
    For this we will create splitting structure to provide link between cost elements and activity.
    In the alove example salaries Wilkinson be linked to labour activity abduction dep and electricity will be linked to .machine hours.
    When you run KSPI it will split the cost between respective cost elements and activities. Here, for salary per hour cost would be 100000/500 = 200 per hour.
    Also machine per hour rate would be 300000/1000 hours = 300 per hour.
    Same will happen in the case of KSII. I.e. actual cost/ activity hours Between respective cost elements and activity.
    Hope you understand the basic concept of splitting structure.
    BR, Srinivas Salpala

  • Activity Costs Revaluation Using Actual Price

    Hi,
    Since we can revaluate the activity costs at actual price in the product costing module itself using t.code MFN1, why SAP has provided another option to revaluate acticvity consumption at actual price in the material ledger multi level price determination?
    What is the difference between the both? If i had used MFN1, do i still have to use the revaluation of activity costs provided in the material ledger?

    Hi,
    However don't you think if the production order activity cost has been revaluated at actuals in the production order then during settlement it will carry the activity actual costs which will be shown in material ledger receipts category with the same actuals value for the activity costs.
    So why should i be revaluating the activity costs again with actual activity price in material ledger once again? It sounds like a duplicate work to me under this scenario....

  • Actual Activity allocation and Planned and actual activity comparison issue in Product Costing

    Friends,
    I have tried to explain the issue i am facing currently under Product Costing......
    1.Cost Component Structure
    10 – Material
    20 – Labour
    30 – Diesel
    40 – Electricity
    2.KP26 – Planned under Fixed Price
    Labour – 2.0 HR
    Diesel – 1.0 HR
    Electricity – 5.0 HR
    3. When I run CK11N system collecting correct rates for all activities (Costing Lot Size- 1)
    Like;
    1              E              LAB10    994310                  2.00        2.00        AED        1.0          HR Labour Cost New
    2              E              DIE20    994320                  5.00        5.00        AED        1.0          HR Diesel Cost New
    3              E              ELE30    994330                  1.00        1.00        AED        1.0          HR Electricity Cost
    4              M            1100000042                          5.00        0.00        AED        1              PC RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED
    5              G            994201                                0.00        0.00        AED                        Depriciation Cost
    6              G            994202                                0.00        0.00        AED                        Sales & Distribution Cost
                                                                              13.00                    AED       
    4.When I do process order Cost analysis for the produced goods it shows me different figures as my
    BOM – RM is 1100000042 1 Quantity
    Routing – All activity time is 1 Hr
    40002                    RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED          1005/1100000042            5.00
    40015                    COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED              1005/4400000071            13.00-
    994310                  Labour Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10      1.33
    994320                  Diesel Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20      3.33
    994330                  Electricity Cost                                                CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30      0.67
                                                                                                                                              2.67- AED
    Note :- As per my understanding it should be
        Labour Cost New                                            2.00
                    Diesel Cost New                                              5.00
                    Electricity Cost                                                1.00
    5.Now after Process Order confirmation
    40002                    RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED          1005/1100000042            5.00
    40015                    COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED              1005/4400000071            00.00
    994310                  Labour Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10      4.00
    994320                  Diesel Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20      5.00
    994330                  Electricity Cost                                                CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30      2.00
                                                                                                                                              16.00
    6.For Month end actual Activity calculation and load the activaty actual rates on product
    I have configured the system in below manner
    1 Work center = Mapped to 1 Production Cost center
    Three Different Activities mapped to Secondary Cost Element with 43 Category
    For Electrictity Activity assesment from Primary to secondary 1 more cost element created with
          Category 42 Like; 994215-Electricity Cost All
    One Actual Assessment has been configured to allocate Electricity cost from Primary Cost element to
          Product/Order
    7.Assessment Cycle Details
    Controlling Area      1000 Controlling Area
    Cycle                ZELE01                  Status    Reviewed
    Start Date 01.01.2014  To  31.10.2014
    Text                  Elec. Cost Allocation to PROD
    IND- Interactive
    Assessment CEle       994215      Electricity Cost All
    Sender
    Cost Center    CBAKYDXBAD
    Cost Element 40204
    Receiver
    Cost Center    CBAKYPDDXB
    Tracing Factor
    Var.portion type – Actual Activity
    Selaction Criteria
    Activity Type - ELE30
    Receivers Tracing Factor
    Cost Ctr Factor per        100
    CBAKYPDDXB 100
    8.I have received the actuall electricity bill for 1100 AED and the same has accocated through KSU5
    After Cycle run when I follow below procedure
    KSS2 Actual cost splitting
    CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                LAB01                    183.33
    CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                DIE02                    183.33
    CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                ELE03                    183.33
    CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                DIE20                    183.33
    CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                ELE30                    183.33
    CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                LAB10                    183.35
                                                                                                                    1100.00
    Issue – System Split Electricity cost between all the activities assigned to Workcentres Cost Centre.
    But I want to post that cost only to ELE30 Activity and not for all
    When I RUN KSSI for actual Price determination system shows
    OTy        Object                                  Name                  AUn                Act Qty      Total price    Price (Fixed)              PUnit
    ATY        CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20        Production Dxb      HR                  5.0          366.66                  366.66                    10
    ATY        CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30        Production Dxb      HR                  2.0          916.65                  916.65                    10
    ATY        CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10        Production Dxb      HR                  2.0          916.75                916.75                    10
                                                                                                                                                          2200.06
    2200.06 is almost double than 1100.00 which is actual electricity cost and the same is actually determined for all the activities.
    After revaluation of the process order system posting below values
    40002                    RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED          1005/1100000042                            5.00        5.00
    40015                    COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED              1005/4400000071                            13.00-    13.00-
    994310                  Labour Cost New                                            CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10                      1.33        183.35
    994320                  Diesel Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20                      3.33        183.33
    994330                  Electricity Cost                                                CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30                      0.67        183.33
                                                                                                                                                              2.67-      542.01
    Production Variance is posted as 542.01….
    I strongly believe there is some issue in configuration for activity allocation….
    Main issue is
    Point No. 4 – Different Figures in Process Order Cost Analysis
    Point No. 7 – Assessment cycle run
    Point No. 8 – KSS2 and KSII for Actual cost Allocation and Production variance…
    Friends… I have tried to explain maximum please help me to understand the concept or missing configuration/Process.
    Thanks
    Sagar Chinchkar

    Dear Rajneesh,
    I have made the changes as suggested....
    It seems now my Order Cost analysis and Product cost analysis are showing the same figures.
    I have also maintained cost center splitting structure for ELE30 Activity allocation.
    Structure Z1
    Splitting structure for AT
    Assignment 10
    Electricity Cost
    100
    Allocation for ELE
    Cost Element
    994215
    Activity Type
    ELE30
    Splitting Rule
    100
    Allocation for ELE
    12
    Activity quantity
    Version 0
    In my case actual activity confirmed is 3.1 for 2 orders in period 5
    Order 1 - QTY 2
    Order 2 - QTY 1.1
    Total actual Electricity exp is 1150 in period 5
    followed procedure to post actual activity on product is mentioned below
    KSS2 Actual cost splitting - Result as expected 1150 for ELE30
    KSII Actual price determination - Result as expected 3.1 actual confirmed QTY for ELE30 with actual price
           QTY 3.1         Tot Price 3,709.68        Planned(FIX) 3,709.68     Per Units 10
           (System is doing 1150/3.1*10=3709.68)
        3.CON2 Actual revaluation of orders
          Here while reevaluating the Process Orders system calculation is different
    Order 1 - QTY 2 -   558.00
    Order 2 - QTY 1.1 - 407.56
    Total -                    965.57
         4. After CON2 system is changing the value of other activities like
         LAB10 - Actual confirmed Value 10  to 0 
         DIE20 - Actual  confirmed Value 10  to 0
    Which should not be the case....
                                                                                                                  PL     Act     Var
    40002
    RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED
    1005/1100000042
    10.00
    15.00
    50.00
    40015
    COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED
    1005/4400000074
    26.00-
    26.00-
    994201
    Depriciation Cost
    WMBDDEP01
    1.00
    0.00
    100.00-
    994202
    Sales & Distribution Cost
    WMBDS&A01
    1.00
    0.00
    100.00-
    994310
    Labour Cost New
    CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10
    4.00
    0.00
    100.00-
    994320
    Diesel Cost New
    CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20
    10.00
    0.00
    100.00-
    994330
    Electricity Cost
    CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30
    2.00
    408.06
    20,303.00
    If we want to just post Electricity cost based on actual Electricity expenses and Labor and Diesel are based on planned activity rates.
    What setting is required in current system.....
    Million thanks in advance....
    Regards
    Sagar Chinchkar

  • Activity Rate change

    Hello Gurus,
    I want to know how to change the activity price rate manually and also
    Last month production order also I want to change the new activity rate (confirmed orders)
    Can anyone give me the clarity on this,
    (because I have confused on the below t code KP06,KP26 ,KBK6,KSII,KPSI,MFN1)
    Regards
    Sri

    Hello Sri
    Changing the price in KP26 now will not serve any purpose. You can not run the standard cost run at back date. The standard cost takes the planned activity price (if so configured). So your standard cost will remain  the same. As far as charging to production orders is concerned, this will be taken care of by the revaluation. It does not make any difference if you update the KP26 plan and then confirm the production orders and then run the revaluation or you run the revaluation now. The total amount of the activities will be the same.
    So I suggest you run the cycle for revaluation at actual prices rather than changing the KP26 rate. For the next month you may update the KP26 plan. The T. Codes you use for the entire cycle are as below:
    KSU5 Execute actual assessment cycle (If you have assessment cycles defined)
    KSS2 Actual cost splitting
    KSII Actual price determination
    CON2 Actual revaluation of orders
    This is a month end process.
    Trust this helps.
    Best,
    Sangram

  • Costs in Cost Center are not zero after Revaluation at Actual Prices

    I executed:
    1. KSS2 - Splitting  (I use a Cost Center ABC and all Cost Elements in the configuration)
    2. KSII - Price Calculation
    3. CON2 - Collective Processing
    4. I see the report KSB1 of the Cost Center ABC, but Costs are not zero after revaluation.  For example
    Cost Element 61:                        $   1000
    Cost Element 62:                        $   2000
    Activity Allocation  98:               $ -2800
    Revaluation at actual price 98:  $ -100
    TOTAL:                                      $ 100
    Total must be $ 0.00
    We work with thousands of product orders in a month.  Is it possible that the problem was for rounding?
    Thanks in advance for your help.
    José Luis

    Hi Ajay,
    I checked OKEQ configuration, it's equal that you mentioned.
    I have seen that Revaluation registers are using other Exchange Rate.  In OB08 Exchange Rate P is 2.80 ( 1 USD --> 2.80 PEN)
    How ever those revaluation registers are using ERate of 2.14 (1 USD --> 2.14 PEN)
    Why revaluation registers use other Exchange Rate?  Is this the problem that Cost Center is not zero?
    Thanks in advance for your help.
    José Luis

  • At the time of actual activity price calculatoin with diffenrent currency

    Dear Friends,
    I am facing some problems. Followings are the information/Problems:
    Controlling Area Currency - USD
    Company Code currency - INR
    Exchange rate - M type - 46.90
    Exchange rate - P type 46.90
    This problem is due to problem-1. At the time of actual activity price calculatoin, I am geeting huge price because system has multiplied (problem-1) and now system is taking posted amount in usd to calcualte actual activity price and according to my observation after calcualtion in usd system is converting price into INR
    Questions - 1. What is the logic of calculation of actual activity price.
    2. As I feel after analyses that sytems is taking posted cost in controlling area currecy and then calculating price and then converting into INR,
    Is my theory correct in term of SAP standard functionality. is there any method by when system take only posted figure in inr for activity price calcualtion.
    Please reply as soon as possible.
    Thanks

    1. If you are using common controlling area with two different participating company code currency, then you have to use group controlling currency and integrate the other company code currency with parallel currency defined in the FI ledger. Hope this is design principle based on which you have selected group currency.
    2. In case group currency controlling then non-participating currency should calculate the activity rates in group currency. Meaning you have define the activity rates at EUR currency and remember this has to accepted globally.
    This is key drawback where you cannot define activity rates in INR, whereas there is no option activity type creation to give object currency as INR.
    Hope this clarifies.

  • Cost Center Report : Revaluation at actual prices - credit but positive sign

    Hi Experts,
    Great day!
    I just want to know the cause of the following unsual behavior of the system. The credit part of the cost center report is blank/zero and when  you double-click the actual line items, it shows that the revaluation at actual prices are positive sign. By clicking an item further, the report will direct me to the CO document to investigate what happened. I found out that the sender - Activity revaluates the price for the receiver - Production Order.
    I looked at the details of the sender - Activity and I found out that the debit/credit indicator is "C" but the sign is positive.
    Your immediate help will be rewarded.
    Thank you!
    Here's the cost center report:
    I am expecting the credit part to have a value right after I executed the "Actual Cost Splitting" at T-code: KSS2
    Here's the unsual behavior:
    Dr/Cr indicator is "C' but the value at Controlling Area Currency is in a positive sign.
    Again, thank you!

    Hi Dryan
    Revaluations are posted to CC after you do CON2 and not KSS2
    1. Did you do CON2 and revaluate the Prod orders with actual activity price?
    2. Ensure that revaluation is allowed in Plan Version 0 for FY 2014
    3. Also, check your activity price calculated in KSII... Revalaution is a result of the actual activity Price (x) Activity Hrs confirmed in Prod order
    4. Check the hrs confirmed in the Production order.. They should be +ve as well
    Br. Ajay M

Maybe you are looking for