Revenue Recognition :- Type A : Time Based Revenue Recognition in Contract

Hello,
I am facing a peculiar problem while creating the contract relevant for Revenue Recognition Type A : Time Based Revenue Recognition in Contract.
The Item category setting I am using is as follows:-
1.     Rev. recognition : A : Time-related revenue recognition
2.     Acc. period start : B : Proposal based on billing plan start date
3.     Revenue Dist. : A : Total Val.: Linear and Correction Value Linearly Distributed
I have already done the necessary activation of Revenue Recognition.
Done the account determination for following :-
1.     Revenue account determination (VKOA)
2.     Deferred revenue (VKOA)
3.     Unbilled receivables (OVUR)
Still when I am trying to save the contract the document goes into Incompletion asking for "GL account for item 10"
Where as in account determination analysis the system has already showing the
1.     Revenue account
2.     Deferred revenue account
Kindly guide further.
Thanks & Regards,
Amrish Purohit

Hi
you can overcome this issue of G/l account missing while saving the document is by assigning the Account key of that condition type in
img-> sales and Disrtibution->account assignment /Costing->revenue account determination-->defina and assign account keys
here you have to assign the account keys you are using for that condition type in pricing procedure against the same conditiontype in the accurals field.
this will solve your problem

Similar Messages

Accrual run and revenue recog( time related revenue recognition)

Hi All,
Please let me know what are the configuration steps required to perform accrual run and revenue recog( time related revenue recognition) in R/3 when we do billing in CRM , for service contracts with start date and end date and billing plan - quarterly in advance
Required scenario:
Contract creation in Crm
Billing in CRM
Accrual Run in R/3
Revenue Recognition in R/3
can we do with the help of result analysis key and internal order .
Your valuable reply awaited
thanks
SK
Moderator: Thread locked due to cross posting.

Hi
Please refer the below mentioned link
http://fuller.mit.edu/sb_support/media_lab/deferred_revenue_recog.htm
http://sap.ittoolbox.com/groups/technical-functional/sap-log-sd/intercompany-revenue-recognition-process-3042637
It may help you
Regards
Praveen P C
Edited by: Praveen Chirakkel on May 18, 2011 9:13 AM

Service Based Revenue Recognition - Prov Account Missing when using WBS

Hi,
I´ve activated RR functionality using service based and aceptance date.
I've followed the intructions from the best practices documents and the notes:
Note 820417 u2013 IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE FOR REVENUE RECOGNITION
Note 1172799 u2013 NEW VERSION OF BEST PRACTICES FOR REVENUE RECOGNITION
Note 678260 CONSTRAINTS
Note 777996 u2013 ACCOUNT SETTINGS FOR REVENUE RECOGNITION PROCESS
Note 779366 u2013 REVENUE RECOGNITION IN THE SD MODULE
Note 1166848 u2013 CUSTOMIZING SETTINGS
Note 782758 u2013 PREREQUISITS FOR USING REVENUE RECOGNITION
Note 835367 - Activating SAP ERP SD revenue recognition
Note 1000830 - Revenue recognition through incoming invoice (third-party
Note 1025066 - Revenue recognition by proof of delivery (POD)
Note 1120297 - Revenue recognition by acceptance date
Note 1125456 - Revenue recognition due to customer-specific event
We are implementing SD, FI (using New Gral Ledger), PS, CO and MM in a company that sells projects. Therefore we're posting everything to the WBS elements.
We need to post the revenue values to the WBS elements too.
The problem is that when we create a sales order for RR indicating a WBS element and try to save it, the system activates the incompletion log saying that the provision account is missing, despite the account is in VKOA.
The strange thing is that if we use a material with profit center (without any WBS or order indication in the sales order) all the revenue recognition process runs perfectly (we save the order, VBREVK is fullfiled, VF44 is run and the invoice is done correctly).
Does anybody know why when using a WBS element in the sales order, SAKN2 field is not fullfiled and the incompletion log is activated???
Is it a program error? Or are we doing something wrong?
Quick responses will be apreciated since we need to move on within two weeks!
Thanks in advance!
María del Valle Pintor.
Moderator: This thread has been locked due to crossposting.
Please do not post the same question in different forums.

sap note 883544

Why do I have to select "continue allowing" every time I visit certain sites in order to be able to type into flash based form fields?

Why do I have to select "continue allowing" every time I visit certain sites in order to be able to type into flash based form fields?
See attached image for reference to what button I am referring to. Until i hit the "continue allowing" button I can not type into the form fields. I have tried removing and reinstalling flash. refreshing firefox, and clearing cache and cookies, and deleting the permissions.sqlite file. Nothing has worked. This issue just started happening a few days ago. Please let me know what I might be able to do to fix this.

That full page including the form is a Flash object.
I didn't see this doorhanger opening when I tried the URL in a new profile.
Did you previously created an exception or is the default selected if you check the permissions for the Flash plugin?
You can inspect and manage the permissions for the domain in the currently selected tab:
*Click the "[[Site Identity Button|Site Identity Button]]" (globe/padlock) on the location/address bar
*Click "More Information" to open "Tools > Page Info" with the Security tab selected
You can go to the Permissions tab (Tools > Page Info > Permissions)
Start Firefox in <u>[[Safe Mode|Safe Mode]]</u> to check if one of the extensions (Firefox/Tools > Add-ons > Extensions) or if hardware acceleration is causing the problem.
*Switch to the DEFAULT theme: Firefox/Tools > Add-ons > Appearance
*Do NOT click the Reset button on the Safe Mode start window
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Safe+Mode
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Troubleshooting+extensions+and+themes

Value Type 32 for RA revenue is not showing up in COSP

Hi gurus,
I have some posting for RA revenue (Value Type - 32). I checked the values in RPSCO, but when i try to get the same values in COSP, i am not able to view any posting or values for RA revenue value type 32.
Is there any config for this, i am not sure what was the issue behind this.. can any one give me a solution...
- Pithan

If it is unsolved, then why are marking the thread as "answered". There are other options available to close the thread, use appropriate option.

JoinFieldValue Revenue Record Type

I have been trying to either create a workflow, or enter a Default Value, on a custom field under Opportunity.
I am trying the following JoinFieldValue('<Revenue>',[<OpportunityId>], '<Custom_Qty>') <--There are brackets around <OpportunityId>, just not displaying in thread.
I got the syntax and record type from the online help, but I am getting an error "Field name ‘Revenue’ is invalid(SBL-SBL-00000)".
We are using Revenue Record Type.
Can someone please assist?
Thanks!

CRMOD has contacted me back and says that Revenue is not available for JoinFieldValue, but the online help file shows otherwise. Anyone else see that they do have Revenue listed under the Record Type?
https://secure-ausomxdsa.crmondemand.com/docs/1.10.0.1080.0.00/enu/help/index.htm?toc.htm?ebjoinfieldvaluehelp.html
not sure if you will be able to get to the link above, but that is the documentation that I am looking at.

Define Time-Based Fields for Cost Centers

Dear All!
I would like to know , how I'm abale to cahnge the setting
of business area for Time-Based Field of Cost Centers to period
Transaction is OKEG
Would be thankful

You can maintain master data for cost centers, cost elements, activity
types, and business processes with time dependencies. You can make
changes at any time for any given time interval. Data storage also takes
place with a time reference. In this way, a master data record can have
multiple database records storing different information.
The smallest interval is one day. To ensure data consistency, you
cannotchange each field daily. The timeframes in which you can change a
field depend on the field functions, which are fixed by the SAP R/3
System and cannot be changed. Master data maintenance includes an
automatic check for each field's time-based consistency, resulting in
individual time-based maintenance for each field.
Regards
Prabhu

Problem with time based rman recovery

Hi and happy boxing day:
I am following by the letter the instructions in Sybex FundamentalsII book p.348 regarding an rman time based recovery. Here is the syntax:
RMAN> run {
2> allocate channel ch1 type disk;
3> set until time 'DEC 26 2007 10:30:00';
4> restore database;
5> recover database;
6> sql 'alter database open resetlogs';
7> }
and here is the error:
allocated channel: ch1
channel ch1: sid=11 devtype=DISK
executing command: SET until clause
released channel: ch1
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-00569: =============== ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS ===============
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-03002: failure of set command at 12/26/2007 11:06:45
ORA-01858: a non-numeric character was found where a numeric was expected
Is this a format issue? Any tips please!
Thanks,
DA

You can only register a database once if you are using a recovery catalog, so whoever or whatever told you to re-register is simply getting their terminology in a knot!
There **is** a sort-of "re-register" command which does sometimes need to be issued after a resetlogs: it's called a RESET command. See http://tinyurl.com/29t5lr for details. A "reset" is, effectively, a "re-register".
One of the details you will see is that you only need to do a manual reset if it was **you** that issued a resetlogs, outside of RMAN. If you get RMAN to do the resetlogs, however, then there's no need to also issue the reset command, because RMAN already knows about it (and has already updated its own metadata accordingly).
The other thing you'll notice from the documentation is that if you aren't using a recovery catalog then the concept of issuing a reset is entirely redundant. That's because you can't recover to a prior incarnation of the database without a catalog: it's one of the main reasons for wanting to run in catalog mode in the first place. No catalog = no ability to step through incarnations = no need to inform RMAN that you're in a new incarnation.

Pb with time-based disagregation

Hi!
In my parea ZPA_REG, i have 2 dataview. One is by week and the second one is by month. I enter 100 at month level for October 2007. Then, i go in the second dataview (week level) and i see
S40 25
S41 25
S42 14
S43 25
S44 11
My question is about S41 ad S44. For S44, since there are only 3 days for october it could explain the result. But i don't understand why for S42 the value is 14 .
The Time Stream ID (transaction /sapapo/calendar) is based on US calendar. Its calculation type is with gaps.
The storage bucket profile is by Day, Week, Month and year.
The time based disagregation for my KF is type P.
Can you help me please.
Thanks by advance,
LB

1. check if there are any holidays in that week. looks like it could be 2 holidays there.
2. zero out all the values in the weeks and re enter 100. sometimes if there is a value already existing it will follow that proportion by default and not your planning area disaggregation type

Time based scale

Hi,
I have set a condition type with an Scale Based Type: N Year. Then I have created the condition records as the following:
from 0 to 2 years it charges a value of 10
from 2 to 4 years it charges a value of 15
more than 4 years it charges a value of 20.
But when I create an FS Quotation for that pricing procedure it is always charging 10.
It doesn´t seem to be afected when I change the duration (I do this by the Valid From and Valid To Dates from the header and the item).
My questions:
Should I use another fields to set the duration?
Am I missing any customizing for a time based scale?
Please give your suggestions

Hi again Gurus,
Has anyone used an scale for time?
Hope to see some comments.
Thanks

SPC charts for time-based data?

I'll try to be succinct in explaining what I'm trying to achieve.
We run batch processes, and at various points in the process we take samples and test them. The sample results should be increasing exponentially over the course of the batch. I have data from a lot of batches in x/y format - x is the duration of the batch and y is the sample result. It makes a very noisy but clearly exponentially increasing data set.
What I want is to calculate some control limits that will obviously have to be increasing over time as well. I want to be able to say that, for a current batch, a sample at X time does or does not fall within the expected historical range.
Is this even possible with xMII, either in the logic editor or the iSPC charts?
I'd like to make the same sort of chart for other time-based samples that have more complex trends over the duration of a batch, not simply exponential or linear.

Hi, Carrie.
Your application doesn't really sound like what I would call an "SPC" chart, but rather, more of a so-called "golden batch" chart. This type of visualization is used when a production activity should have an expected set of value(s) and/or a shape to a curve. You would then "overlay" actual values onto this curve to track actual vs. expected and perhaps to highlight deviations.
This can best be done by combining a multiple queries using BLS (one or more queries for the "limits" and expected values, one query for the actual values), and combining/merging them so that the charting engine (either a line/marker chart or an XY plot) sees them as coming from a single source.
With some creativity, you can even have the "outlier" points displayed in another color. The xMII application team can help you with setting this up - Jeremy may still have a chart template/transaction I put together a while back called "LimitChart", which could be used for your application.
Rick

Asr1000 and time-based acl

Hi
We use 7206 as a PPPoE BRAS. All user sessions are rate limited using MQC on virtual-access interfaces.
Rate changes dependng of the time of day. It's imlemented using time-based acl. Now we want to migrate to asr1000,
but that router doesn't support time-based acl according to Cisco FN.
Question is how to change user traffic rates on asr1000 on time of day basis?

radius attribute nas-port-type through rate-limit (firewall)
http://conft.com/en/US/docs/ios/security/command/reference/sec_r1.html#wp1062750

Tick vs. time -based animation

Hi. I'm a bit of a newbie and I was wondering if I could get some information/opinions on animation techniques. I've seen a few mentions (one very recently by Abuse) of tick-based animation being inferior to time-based animation. I'm pretty sure I get the two concepts -- I assume it's just a matter of defining when the environment is automatically updated.
On the one hand (tick-based) keep a tick count and after x ticks go by, move your elements.
On the other hand (time-based), update the environment, repaint (I assume this would have to be via active rendering) and then figure out how long to sleep until update/render next time, i.e. (SLEEP - timeThisCycleTook).
My first question is: Am I correct? :-) If not, please enlighten me on the two approaches.
My next question is: why is time-based so much better? It seems to me it would allow the frame rate to be more stable, though would the frames be drawn at more predictable intervals with tick-based?
Any information that would un-confuse me would be greatly appreciated! :)
-Eric

hehe, I love spawning contraversial topics :D
Your understanding of tick based V's time based appears to be correct - as for the advantages between the 2 - thats abit of a contraversial area.
Both techniques are useful, depending on the circumstances...
tick based
advantages:-
*easier collision detection
*more predictable simulation
disadvantages :-
* if used on a computer that is too slow to keep up with the tick rate,
your game will run at <100% speed. This may affect user input (if using polling),
and will also cause problems with game difficulty/balancing
(things are easier to control when they happen slower than they should)
* in multiplayer, the gamespeed will be limited by the slowest client
(which is ok for RTS type games, but very bad for FPS type games)
* on fast computers, your game will not be taking full advantage of the speed
time based
advantages :-
* networking synchronization is alot easier (and a constant speed can be maintained, even with slow clients)
* the speed of the computer is fully exploited
disadvantages :-
* collision detection is alot trickier
those are not the definitive adv/dis by any means -
just what I could come up with off the top of my head.
feel free to add/correct to them...
abu,

Implementation of Time-based QOS/CAR, using "time-range" command

We would like to configure a Time-based QOS/CAR Policy to allow our ISP Customer to have more Burst BW during Weekends then weekdays. In our setup, we color all Burst traffic of all Customers with precedence 1 and then allocate some amount of BW to this shared Pool for precedence 1. So, using Cisco's Technology of "time-range", we have done following config to achieve the said objective. But we are not able to achieve the automatic activation of weekday CAR despite the fact that weekend acces-list/Car gets automatically get deactivated when week-end is over and weekday access-group i.e. 197 gets activated (gets activated but no match in access-group & CAR, can see using show access-list & sh interface rate-limit | include access-group 199 command)
Would appreciate yr valuable input to achieve the desired task.
Configuration :
Interface HSSI 2/0/0
rate-limit output access-group 199 6000000 32000 32000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
rate-limit output access-group 197 5000000 32000 32000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
Global Coonfig :
access-list 197 permit ip any any precedence priority time-range WEEKDAYS
access-list 199 permit ip any any precedence priority time-range WEEK-END
time-range WEEK-END
periodic weekend 00:00 to 23:59
time-range WEEKDAYS
periodic weekdays 00:00 to 23:59
Note : Customer's Burst Pkts have already been colored with precedence bit 1 i.e priority in CAR statement which are above of these two CAR statements(these CAR statements come in last).

Hi,
I have used the below command.
run
allocate auxiliary channel ch1 type disk;
allocate auxiliary channel ch2 type disk;
set newname for database to '/u08/app/oracle/oradata/new/%b';
duplicate database to "new"
UNTIL TIME "TO_DATE('08-JAN-2014 15:22:31','DD-MON-YYYY HH24:MI:SS')"
BACKUP LOCATION '/backup01'
LOGFILE
GROUP 1 ('/u08/app/oracle/oradata/new/log01a.dbf','/u08/app/oracle/oradata/new/log01b.dbf') SIZE 100M REUSE,
GROUP 2 ('/u08/app/oracle/oradata/new/log02a.dbf','/u08/app/oracle/oradata/new/log02b.dbf') SIZE 100M REUSE,
GROUP 3 ('/u08/app/oracle/oradata/new/log03a.dbf','/u08/app/oracle/oradata/new/log03b.dbf') SIZE 100M REUSE;
Thanks
SR

Sales orders in TDMS company/time based reduction are outside the scope

Guys,
I have had some issues with TDMS wheras it didn't handle company codes without plants very well. That was fixed by SAP. But I have another problem now. If I do a company code and time based reduction, It doesn't seem to affect my sales orders in VBAK/VBUK as I would have expected. I was hoping it would only copy sales orders across that have a plant which is assigned to a company code that was specified in the company code based reduction scenario. That doesn't seem to be the case.
VBAK is now about one third of the size of the original table (number of records). But I see no logic behind the reduction. I can clearly see plenty of sales documents that have a time stamp way back from what I specified in my copy procedure and I can see others that have plant entries that should have been excluded from the copy as they do belong to different company codes than the ones I specified.
I was under the impression that TDMS would sort out the correct sales orders for me but somehow that doesn't seem to be happening. I have to investigate further as to what exactly it did bring across but just by looking at what's in the target system I can see plenty of "wrong" entries in there either with a date outside the scope or with a plant outside the scope.
I can also see that at least the first 10'000 entries in VBAK in the target system have a valid from and to date of 00.00.0000 which could explain why the time based reduction didn't work?
Did you have similar experiences with your copies? Do I have to do a more detailed reduction such as specifying tables/fields and values?
Thanks for any suggestions
Stefan
Edited by: Stefan Sinzig on Oct 3, 2011 4:57 AM

The reduction itself is not based on the date when the order was created but the logic enhances it to invoices and offers, basically the complete update process.
If you see data that definitely shouldn't be there I'd open an OSS call and let the support check what's wrong.
Markus

Revenue Recognition :- Type A : Time Based Revenue Recognition in Contract

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for