Reversal of the segment of assement cycle possible ?

Dear SAP Experts
I am looking on the below issue
User has executed an assessment cycle KSU5 with segment with wrong assignment of receiver internal order , after execution the values from cost center are posted to wrong internal order.
The problem is for reversing the cycle it contains 37 segments which does not require to reverse all the segments for one wrong segment.
Please suggest whether any possibility to reverse the segment and correct the segment and rerun the cycle for that segment or any other solution for this issue .
Thanks
Pardha

if you want to reverse only one segment , try to lock segments for which , no reversal has to be performed.
Also check Segment Adjustment in KSU5.
regards,
ramesh b

Similar Messages

Mass upload of factors into segments of assessment cycles in CCA

Dear experts,
is there a way to upload or mass input of factors into the segments of assessment cycles?
Something like KSU8 for mass data?
Best regards
Gregor

Hi,
We don;t have such a tool.
I have worked some of the biggest projects in SAP, we never invented some thing like this
Best Regards
Surya

How Do I Customize the Key Combination to Cycle Through Windows in Reverse in all Applications?

How do I customize the key combination to cycle through windows in reverse in all applications? I want to be able to change the global setting for Command+~ (Cmd+Shft+`) to something more desireable. I could NOT find a way to do this in Systems Preference -> Keyboard -> Keyboard Shortcuts since there is not a menu selection "Cycle Through Windows in Reverse". I then went and looked in the plists DBs of Finders resources hoping to find a setting I could override. I was quite supprised, as well as some of the MAC gurus in the office, that there was not an easier way to override cycling through windows in reverse on a MacBook - the most user friendly and accessibility aware computer on the market:)
Here is my MAC software info.
System Version: Mac OS X 10.6.7 (10J869)
Kernel Version: Darwin 10.7.0

I don't know of any way to have a separate commandkey combo for the reverse cycle function.
From the Help pages for OS X 10.6.7 ("Using global keyboard shortcuts") -
NOTE: You can create keyboard shortcuts only for exisiting menu commands.
Since the 'reverse' cycle command is not an existing menu item, creating a separate key combo for it doesn't seem possible. Apparently the 'reverse' cycle command is a fixed one, internally defined as a mod of the normal cycle command invoked by adding Shift to its key combo.
There may be a way to achieve what you want via a two-step process: write an AppleScript that will invoke the 'reverse' key-combo set, then link the activation of the AppleScript to a key combo of your choosing. Not sure if this is even possible, though - usually AppleScript activation via keyboard would be set up via an FKey.
I can understand wanting to share the RSI risk evenly between both hands, or even to unload the left hand if that is desirable. However, apparently a two-key combo can't be done for the reverse cycle function. Is a three-key combo not possible? ...meaning a two-key combo on the right (Command plus something) for normal cycling, adding Shift for reversing?
One caution about changing keyboard command combos - it's very easy to accidentally set up a conflict with a another existing commandkey set. FWIW, most, if not all, of the mnemonic and easily-reached letters are already used. In this vein, the Keyboard Shortcuts page of the Keyboard prefs pane shows such conflicts via a yellow caution triangle next to the conflictors.

Is it possible to reinitialise a control value to default each time the program redo his cycle in a while loop ?

Is it possible to reinitialise a control value to default each time the program redo his cycle in a while loop ?
My problem is that I have a numeric control (0 or 1) and I want taht wahn the numeric is 1 labview makes the writing process of my data but after that the control must return to 0 to write only one time.
Is it possible ? I've tried some trials but none of them succeded

well i'm student and i have to write a program for school i don't know labview very well.
i post here the part of the program i have to do so you can see what i must do .
The button pass with datasocket so i can't use boolean and the problem is that the value must be set to 1 only for one cycle (one writing of the values). so when th people set it to 1 in internet explorer for exemple the value must be considered as a impulsion and as it is it always do a lot of cycle until the man set it manualy to 0 what i don't want.
Attachments:
exemple.vi ‏9 KB

Out of sequance reversal on the off cycle work bench

HI All.
We have a scenario where we have a cash payments to the employees which creates the WT/557 instead of /559. The GL posting is done and everything was fine. Then we realized that we paid an incorrect payment so we reversed out the payroll results then it created /569 instead of /571. I ran the next payroll because of the reversal system has gone to retro and re evalute the reversal period. When I am trying to do the GL positng I am getting an erro saying __"customizing for Wage type /569"_* has been changed*._ I am totally stuck at point since we did not chang any thing related to /569
Any help is appreciated
Thanks in advance for the help...
Regards,
AR

Whenever there is Reversal in payroll post /571 will come up, which is a reversal of /569.
Pls check the processing class of /569 which is having only 6,25,30,31 and 32 with 0 specification also check for /571 where PRCL 23 is having 2 specification and 6,25,30,31 and 32 with 0 specification.
Hope it helps you
- Ashish
Edited by: Ashish Bhati on Dec 23, 2009 12:19 AM

Reversal of the Physical Inventory Postings

Dear All,
I hv posted the qty difference thru' MI07 in period 02' 09. Now Finance says that this is required to be posted in 01' 09. I tried reversing the PI docs thru MI02 but the system didn't permit me as the difference is already posted and the way out is doing physical inventory again. But due to the cycle count settings, I am not able to carry out the Physical Inv again.
Pls advise asap.
Thnx & Rgds,

Hi
I dont think you can reverse material document (movement type 701.702) posted through physical inventory as it is automatically created and you cannot create new document and post through MI10 because of cycle counting settings. First change the physical counting settings if possible and then proceed for recount & postings (MI10). Otherwise give a try creating new document through MI31 by selecting materials subj to ph.counting and batches subj to ph.counting.
Thanks

Removinga field from the segment which is already released

Hi Folks,
I have created a custom segment & released it. But later when I want to remove a field from it I'm not able to do so. I tried to cancel the release of the segment & then make the required changes but while tried to cancel the release I'm getting an error saying "Error while resetting release of segment ZDATA_BASIC_SEG". Kindly let me know how could I remove the field from this segment. For your information the current release of our system is 700 & the release of segment is also 700.
Thanks & Regards,
santosh

Hi Santosh,
As you said, current release of your system is 700 & the release of segment is also 700.
I tried to test the possible errors during the release of the segment. Please have a breakpoint in the program LEDIJF05 in the form CHANGE_CLOSE_SEGDEF. The error could be mismatch with the previous definition of the segment, where the release is not equal to 700.
Message Id : EA, msg no 259.
Please check.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Satish Kanteti

Key flexfield - protecting one of the segment as NON-UPDATABLE/ READ-ONLY

Key Flexfield setup for "People Group Flexfield" consists of seeg1,seg2,seg3,seg4.
We would like to make Seg1 of this flexfield "READ ONLY" / "DISPLAY ONLY" / "Non-Updatable".
Please advise possible way of making this functionality.
I have tried, following but no luck :
1) Limitations of Forms Personalization [ID 420518.1]
Forms Personalization is not possible for any key flexfield structure or segments.
This is a limitation of Forms Personalization on Flexfield. There was an enhancement request Bug 5506506 - "PERSONALIZE FLEXFIELDS BY USING FORMS PERSONALIZATION" but it was rejected the enhancement request as this is not feasible. A Flexfield is a single field in a form but then when you click into it and it opens up the flexfields window, the multiple fields you see is actually a user exit with multi segment values, not form fields. No Form Personalization events are passed to flexfield windows (user exits). No Form Personalization events are passed to segments inside the flexfield window (user exit).
2) Key Flexfield Security Rules Enabled
Defining security rules on any segment in key flexfield makes all segments as read only. Per Oracle Document:"Defining security rule on key flexfield combination on one or more segments allows all segments to be not updatable"

In SSHR, I believe it is possible although I have not done it before, I have spoken to people who have.
You need to have access to jDeveloper and be able to open up the SSHR page in question. Find the internal ID of the flex item within the SSHR page in question.
Then you create a new item in personalization and set that new item to have the same ID as you retrieved from jDeveloper. Make that item read only and configured the 'default' flex to not show the segment in question.
That is basically the way this can be achieved but it is not straightforward and requires a cursory understanding of OAF.
I do not know if it is possible to do this in the PUI. Would be interested to know requirement behind essentially showing a static read only field in a professional form - can the admins not be trusted to leave it alone? One workaround would be coding a user hook or custom library to error if that field is updated. Not read only but would stop those pesky Administrators meddling with it!

Can we show the details of off-cycle payroll in regular monthly payslip?

Hi!!!
My client wants to see the details of off-cycle payments with the payments and deductions during the regular payroll in the regular payslip. How can we do this?
Please suggest a solution.
regards
MD

Hi,
With SAP Standard, it is not possible.........If still client insists on the same, need to go for enhancement of the payslip writing the logic of retrieving the offcycle results for display.
Regards
Team Member.

Payment document reversal at the time of invoice reversal

Hi,
We are facing a problem of payment document getting reversed at the time of invoice reversal in FICA in IS-U. We had raised a query with SAP twice and they had asked fro two notes to be applied. But still it is not working. Has anybody faced such a problem in IS-U or can anybody suggest any solution for this.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Purab Shah

Hi,
Thanks for your reply. The user is using the t-code EABICO for reversing the invoice which is resulting in the reversal of the payment document which should not happen as the clearing document has not been reset. SAP had instructed the notes 920467 & 965639 to be applied but inspite of applying the notes the problem still persists. The effects of the problem are:
1) the customer does not get tge credit of the payments he has made.
2) due to reversal bank reconciliation is not possible.
Kindly advise.
Thanks,
Purab

Sending multiple attachments in EMail adapter based on the segments:

Hi,
The scenario is from IDOC-Mail and the requirement is will we be able to send multiple files in the Email based on the segments ?
Just assume that you have to create one file with the IDoc header data,
and in addition to that one file per segment.
Is this requirement possible?Please help .
Thanks & Regards,
Rajesh
Edited by: rajeshkpnnaidu on Dec 16, 2010 8:33 AM

Hi,
In this case IDoc-file-mail, if we create multiple files based on the each IDoc segments,how we can combine all the files(created in local directory) which are related to 1 single IDoc and send all of them in a single mail.
Ex: if there are 20 files in local folder with 2 different IDoc segments then how we can filter based on each IDoc.
Hope i am clear with my above description.
Please help?
BR,
Praveen

Problem in reversal of the GR posting

Dear all,
While trying to reverse the Process Order confirmation, we are getting the below errorwith message,
Message no.- QA046
Diagnosis: You are attempting to reverse a goods receipt although quantity postings have been already been made from the inspection lot. This means that stock for the good receipt has already been transferred and for this reason a cancellation of the document is no longer possible.
Procedure:
Ensure that the postings in QM (within the usage decision transactions) are carried out.
Referring to the above message, please let me know how and in which t.code the above problem can be corrected?
Thanks and regards,
Brijesh

Hi JH,
Thanks for the inputs. We were able to cancell the inspection lot. But even after that, we were not able to reverse the GR posting through cancellation of Process Order confirmation. In COGI, we see two records. But were not able to process that as we get the same message which i mentioned before. Kindly suggest.
Regards
brijesh

Reversal of the Invoice Verification Document

Dear Freinds,
The users are trying to do the reversal of the Invoice Verification Document, but the system gives the error message 'No Reversal possible, Reverse Value must be reset'. When we look at the diagnosis, it suggests that the qty is same but the value is not the same as Invoice. The PO history for this item in the PO does not show any credit note passed which would result in the difference in the value.. What else could we check to resolve the issue.
Thanks!
Regards,

Hi Jeya,
Thanks for the help, we haven't used in BADI or User Exit, how else can we find this out and resolve the issue?
Regards,

IDOCS postion is moved in PEXR2001 and the segment is E1IDB02 BB

Hi Experts:
I have a question about the idocs, the position FIIBKENN is populated by Bank Number when my bank master data doesn't have SWIFT, however when my bank master data has SWIFT is populated in FIIBKENN too and the Bank number is populated in FIIBKUKN this means that the position is moved depends of the data in the master data. My question is Can be fixed the positions in this idoc? The Object name is PEXR2001 and the segment is E1IDB02 BB ---0010.
Best regards

Dirk,
It is possible to serialize the Idoc's when sent from your SAP system itself.
Refer this blog and also the comments section of this blog where Michal provides a few interesting comments,
<a href="/people/community.user/blog/2006/11/04/how-to-serialize-idoc-xml-messages-fed-into-xi">How to serialize IDoc XML messages fed into XI</a>
Regards
Bhavesh

AR01 balance is not matching with FAGLL03 balance between the segments

Dear Consultants
I am facing one problem in Assets Reconciliation. I.e, the balance which is showing in AR01 report is not matching with FAGLL03 report for P & M Assets.
In my client I have two segment . 1000 and 2000.
As per that reports of both AR01 and FAGLL03 effect is as follows.
1.     GL value is showing more by Rs.54,13,516.34 with AR01 in 1000 segment in P &M at
                31.03.2009
2.     GL value is showing Less by Rs.54,13,516.34 with AR01 in 2000 segment in P & M at
                31.03.2009
After uploading the legacy balances as on 30.06.2008,
1.SAP Segmental Trail Balance has been tallied with Segmental Trial balance as 30.06.2008
2.Except this P & M balances, remaining all assets were tallied between FAGLL03 and
AR02 segment wise.
3.acquisitions during the year also tallied and Over all at company code level balance from 01.04.2008 to 31.03.2009 also tallied for all Assets including this P &M.
Cross check points:
1.I have checked the cost center , profit center and segments assignment u2013ok
2.I have tallied Profit center wise AR01 and FAGLL03. except, this P &M
3. No Manual Entries has been posted
So pls suggest me what could be possible reasons for this
any how. my client maintained the legacy system till 31.03.2009 along with SAP. now as per Oracle we are matching this values. so ,what I am thinking is ,to match the balances in P &M between the segments, Shall I post the JV between these gment? because , as on 31.03.2009 legachy value is matching with AR01 values.
--Only problem between Legacy value and GL Value.
--Depreciation not yet posted.
--client is ready to pass required adjustement entries after posting the depreciation as on 31.03.2009 to
match with legacy balance
--So ,I dont think it is not problem if post the manual entry in Asset GL to match the balance between legacy and Fagll03 report
--Over all Comapny code level plant and Machinery values is tallied with Legachy value
early reply will be very highly appreicated
Regards
Edited by: Ramatulasi Marivada on May 27, 2009 10:33 AM

Hello,
Run ABST2 to know the difference between GL and Asset Accounting.
Hope you must have reset the reconciliation accounts of assets OAMK and posted all the relevant GL asset balances. Note that initial asset balances loaded in AA will not automatically be transferred to GL. You need to pass the JVs.
Regards,
Ravi

Reversal of the segment of assement cycle possible ?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for