Reverse tele cine file size

Quick question here. Is it normal to have a file that was put through reverse telecine to be smaller then its original. I had a .mov file that was captured in final cut that was shot at 24p )(not pa) and had ro reverse it and it looks great, runs great but the file size is roughly off the top of my head 10% smaller. Also if anyone wants to take a crack at me cinema tools problem that I posted not long please be my quest. I see alot of views but no comments yet, Thank you
Nathan

One thing you could try to do is avoid using xpath like ".//" and "*".
I had many problems in terms of memory consuptiom and performance with xpaths like above.
Altrought you have a little more work to code your xslt it performs better, and probably you will write once and run many times.

Similar Messages

  • Can I tell the file size of my .folio without an iPad?

    I've been searching everywhere for this answer, but alas, it has escaped me. How can I tell the file size of my .folio? I'm sure this is really simple. I'd like to be able to see the final file size of my folio without an iPad.

    I think if you log into acrobat.com, you should see your folio there, too.
    You see the article sizes and may be able to add them together.
    Be catuous, editing your folio through acrobat.com might break it.
    —Johannes
    (mobil gesendet)
    Am 13.12.2011 20:33 schrieb "Sheenz1701" <[email protected]>:
       Can I tell the file size of my .folio without an iPad?  created by
    Sheenz1701 <http://forums.adobe.com/people/Sheenz1701> in *Digital
    Publishing Suite* - View the full discussion<http://forums.adobe.com/message/4082274#4082274>

  • Please can you tell me the default maximum file size for an attachment in Case Management v12 ?

    Hi,
    Please can you tell me the default maximum file size for an attachment in Case Management v12+? I am able to define a maximum attachment size but I am not able to see what the default is set to.
    Thank you
    Regards,
    Anthony

    Hi,
    The default max attachment size is 8MB.
    Regards.
    Mike

  • How to tell file size in Elements 9 for Mac

    I'm new to Mac.  I've used Elements for many years.  When I click on File>open and browse my image icons in the "finder" folder (no, I don't use iPhoto), I can't see file size info.  In Windows, I used to be able to hover my cursor over an image icon and read the file size info.  This doesn't work in Mac.  When I go the Finder>preferences and set image info for icons, the file's size appears in a different color beneath each icon, which is great.  But when I try to browse finder from the Open file menu in Editor, the file size is gone.  How do I fix this?  I mean if I have three images of the same subject, but different sizes, how can I tell which is which? 
    Thanks for your help!
    Dave

    Yes, this is something that has annoyed everyone ever since OS X started (you could do it in OS 9). One workaround is to use column view. Once you choose an image you will see all the data about it in the righthand column:

  • Reversing "reduce file size"??

    Can this be done??! I originally wanted to reduce the file size of a publication so I could send it as an email attachment, but I want to still have the original image quality for printing. Will printing quality be affected with the reduced file size?
    Thank you...

    Yes it will be affected as it reduces the resolution and the compression is lossey. A quick test will reveal the difference. You would need to retain 2 copies, one small, one large.
    Are you aware of the problems with emailing Pages files? Also does the recipient have Pages to open/view it?
    I hope you only want to print the file to your desktop printer. Pages is not suitable for commercial quality printing.
    Peter

  • How do I convert a file size to decimal so I can assign an isbn to my book?  my size is 802 kb and have no idea what this means.

    I am an independent author that has purchased the batch of 10 isbn's from bowker.  When I put in all the information to assign the isbn to my book, it tells me the file size must be converted to decimal.  I have searched the internet and understand that one meg would be 10^6 but what is it if it is over or under one meg? my file size is 802 kb.  so would that be .802 x 10^6?  I have tried this and it still will not accept it.  Can someone please help me with this as I have spent 250 dollars and bowker has zero customer support and refuses to answer this question.

    tanyafrombakersfield wrote:
    It starts preparing to write the disc,then it says,"
    The drive reported an error: Sense Key= HARDWARE ERROR Sense Code= 0x09,0x01 TRACKING SERVO FAILURE.
    This is an error reported by the optical drive's firmware. The tracking servo is the servomechanism which guides the laser pickup along the track on the optical disc. The error means that the servo couldn't do its job within the programmed parameters. What it doesn't say is why.
    You have to be very precise as to when this error occurs. If it occurs as you wrote, while it "starts preparing to write the disc", and not when it has actually began to burn, then it's likely that the drive has gone bad and needs to be replaced.
    There are other possibilities, so you should check them, but they would be more likely if the error occurred after the drive began to write. OrangeMarlin has suggested two options -- try a different brand of CD or DVD, and try cleaning the lens.

  • Crystal Report File Size Limitation

    Post Author: lashworth
    CA Forum: General
    I am running into a file size issue with Crystal Reports. If the report file approaches 80MB then they do not run or display well or at all. Can anyone tell me how best to investigate this problem?

    Hello,
    What version of Cr and .NET?
    Does your printer have limited memory?
    Is it local printer?
    Have you tried installing the latest Drivers for it?
    What Browser are you using and have you tried any other?
    40 pages not much local memory so it shouldn't be a problem.
    Create a new Printer and select File rather than port or LPT as the destination to see if it's a physical printer or network issue.
    Try a different printer altogether also.
    Also refer to Rule of Engagement posting before submitting your question so you provide as much info first.
    Thank you
    Don

  • I need to export a photo at around 1meg file size,and dont seem to be able to do it in the presets can anyone help please ,I shoot on a canon 5d

    I need to export a photo at around 1meg file size,and dont seem to be able to do it in the presets can anyone help please ,I shoot on a canon 5d

    I believe Frank is referring to the end use (e.g., for print or on-screen use).
    Until he returns, I can tell you that I ran a quick test using an image from the Aperture 3 training book library which was as follows:
    Camera = Canon EOS 5D Mark II
    Master resolution = 5616 x 3744 (21 MP)
    I was able to export to a JPEG with end file size of 1 MB as follows:
    Export Presets drop-down > select 'Edit' option
    Selected preset name 'JPEG - 50% of Original Size' > change percentage value to 40% > change DPI value to '300' > click OK to set as current default > Export version to desktop.
    The exported JPEG has a resolution of 2246 x 1498 and appears on screen to have the same image quality of the original in Aperture.
    Note - I did not change the default Image Quality slider in the Export Preset dialog (which left it at 10).
    Basically, you will need to play around with the settings until you find the appropriate values to arrive at an image version you want.

  • How do I decrease the file size of my After Effects video without losing the quality?

    I made a video that was 7 minutes and 11 seconds long for my brothers wedding. The quality is really good but the file size is 1.52 GB and I would rather have that be in the megabytes so that I can send it to family members. It does not have to be so low that I can send it in an email but just not so big to where I can't burn it to a disc or place on a flash drive. I realize that I have not provided much information but I don't know what you will need to help me with this problem. If you would please tell me what information you need below then I will happily provide it for you.

    http://forums.adobe.com/thread/684381?tstart=0 and please do a search on H.264 and WMV encoding and recommended settings - here on this forum and on the web in general. This question has been asked to death and answered equally as often. Even a lazy search will turn up hundreds of usable answers.
    Mylenium

  • Get file size value for export to .txt

    I have created a script to export metadata using the XMP Script Library.  I am able to get all the properties I need except one: image file size (not dimensions, but the size of the file itself in MB).  File size is not included in any XMP namespaces and it isn't in any TIFF tags as far as I can tell.
    Getting the file name is very straightforward: exportFile.write (thumb.name), but I can't find any method to get the file size.
    Any ideas would be a big help.
    Thanks in advance,
    Greg Reser

    var sels = app.document.selections;
    alert(sels[0].spec.length);
    This will get you the file size in bytes, then you can divide to get Mbytes.

  • Save For Web vs. Resizing vs. File Size vs. PNG

    In playing around with some settings while saving a .png file, I noticed some weird results. For this example, the original image is 300 x 300, but I want the final size to be 200 x 200. I get different results depending on the order I perform the following operations (I never thought the order mattered until now).
    1. start with 300 x 300 image, choose save for web, select png-24, with transparency, white matte, convert to sRGB, change image size to 200 x 200, then save - the file size is 37kb
    2. start with 300 x 300 image, use Photoshop's "image size" to change to 200 x 200, then save for web, etc - the file size is 111kb
    So depending on which step I resize the image, the file size is significantly different - if I resize BEFORE using save for web, the file size is much larger. This is just weird to me, but I always resize AFTER choosing save for web, so that's why I've never caught this until now. In case you ask, while using Photoshop's "image size", all three options are checked at the bottom of that window, so nothing is getting re-sampled or anything like that.
    The only thing I can think of is each of those methods treat pixel data differently when reducing the dimensions. When I overlay both exported .png files on top of each other, I see no difference in pixel quality and/or color shift - so why the big difference in file size? Unsurprisingly, if I just save the file straight to .png, the sharpness is much better, and the file size is 46kb. I did notice when saving for web, the colors become a little more saturated.
    Are all these results typical? I've never really paid much attention to the results when exporting .png's. I always thought the results were lossless (in general).

    Too many variables
    What? There are 2 variables here (variables = scenarios = steps). Only two different operations.
    1. resize the image, THEN use "save for web" = 91kb
    2."save for web", THEN change image size = 157kb
    Hopefully my logic translates here:
    All other settings are the same. I even made sure the .psd was sRGB this time. The specific question was "why does the different workflow order produce such a big difference in file size"?
    In creating a new test file (http://www.shan-dysigns.com/userForums/photoshop/savePNG.zip), I did notice an interesting thing: (I'm including my files in case you want to follow along or test for yourself)
    If I merge all layers BEFORE performing the steps above, the file sizes were relatively closer to one another - 168kb and 157kb (respectively from the 1, 2 list above)
    One thing to note is all the .psd layers are either shapes or text - this whole scenario may be totally different if each layer had rasterized content (actually, it does, by about -20kb).
    The file size in step 1 above didn't jump until it had to consider rastered text/shapes into the calculation. So all this tells me the difference in file size has to do with how each process handles vector data. Maybe when you allow PS to resize the image first, the overall file size is smaller because the vector data gets recalculated???
    I don't know how to properly interpret all these differences, but I do know there is something about PS's operation of resizing the canvas with vector data versus resizing the canvas with rasterized data - this has to be where the difference in file size lies.
    Maybe I've just wasted a bunch of time on the obvious, but I think I learned something here. Now my head hurts and my eyes have popped out of my head.
    So, Chris, I guess there ARE more variables in this situation. My curse is being nosey and wanting to know more technically about PS than most casual designers probably would care about.

  • How do I shrink a file size in Adobe Acrobat 5.0?

    Could someone tell me a way to shrink a MB pdf file down to kb size?

    There is no mechanism in Workspaces for reducing file size.

  • How do I reduce a Word doc file size? (346 MP: 50 pages of text; no pictures)

    I have a Macbook Air (circa 2010) using OS X 10.9.2. I have Office 2011 and am having trouble with a Word doc. It's 50 pages of just text (no pictures) but is 346.8 MB. It takes forever to save and Word crashes a lot. I have checked for updates to Word.
    The only thing I can think of is that it copied over audio from audio notes. As background, I took text and audio notes in individual word documents for a semester's worth of classes. I then wanted all of the text together so I copied and pasted each class's notes into this document (in print layout, not in notebook layout). As far as I can tell, the audio did not come along to the new file. But I can't think of what else would cause the enormous file size.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated. I've already changed the auto save and copy and paste settings. I also tried File > Reduce File Size, but that didn't help because the doc has no pictures.
    Edit: I should also add, I don't want to lose the formatting, which is why I haven't tried just copying and pasting it into a text doc or something. It has headings, subheadings, etc.

    Have you considered this ... since you suspect there may be old garbage in the file?
    Try creating a brand new document in Word.  Then try copying and pasting the old document into the new one.  You may choose to do this in sections, or a few pages at a time.

  • Adobe Bridge Reports Inaccurate File sizes

    Im still in CS4 but can't seem to find a forum on CS4.  In any case, why does Bridge report inaccurate file sizes?  I thought I could use bridge to select all of the M2V files in a folder which I wanted to use in an Encore DVD project to get an accurate total file size.  That way I would know if all of the selected files would fit on a single DVD.  But Bridge doesn't report an accurate total file size of selected files.  What's up with that?  Is that too much to ask out of Bridge?

    but where is the "activity bar"?  I don't see another total indicator of
    selected files anywhere.
    Well I think we are talking about something you already discovered but there
    seems not an official name for it I believe, I call it the activity bar, it
    might also be called a status bar or status monitor, can't find the official
    name for it at this moment.
    Anyway It is at the bottom of the Bridge window left side. Click on a folder
    and it tells you the number of items showed and items hidden (and here it
    should also say the total amount of folder size but as said before, a long
    standing feature request). Click on one or more files and it shows the
    amount of selected files and the total size of the selected files.
    When first opening a folder in the content window Bridge needs to cache the
    thumbs and depending on settings also thumbnails. When caching you see in
    this bar a spinning arrow showing it is still caching and also the amount of
    files to cache that are left.
    A very useful item in my workflow

  • Fix file size of local time machine backup

    Hi all,
    I'm having an issue where after copying over Backups.backupdb from my 1.5 GB external drive to another iMac, it shows that folder as now being 6.27 TB. The local disk on the iMac is 1 TB.
    The resson I copied over Backups.backupdb to the iMac is that suddenly one day when connecting the external drive to my MacBook, (This external drive was used with the MacBook as a Time Machine backup) I was promted with a warning that there was a problem with the external drive and that I should copy the files over to another location and reformat the external drive. After copying over the files on the external drive to the iMac I then reformatted it.
    So, the issue is that Finder reads that the Backups.backupdb is 6.27 TB and I can't copy it back over to the newly reformatted external drive.
    If anyone has any insight, I would really apreciate it if someone could tell me if it's possible to:
    modify Backups.backupdb and it's contents sitting on the iMac to show it's actual file size, correct the permissions and extended attributes?
    copy over Backups.backupdb to the external dirve in some other way (I tried via Terminal but with no luck)?
    Thanks in advanced!
    Paul

    I had the same problem!
    Time machine folder was using around 230GB on a 1Tb disk space.
    Had to format the disk because Time Machine was stucked at "preparing backup" or something similar after 6 months without using it.
    But after transferring it's main folder to my desktop, it is now showing 1.6Tb size!
    I can't move it back to the 1TB disk after format and I as need to do a clean reinstall to my Macbook Pro HDit seems I will have to trash my Time Machine saved folder an loose all it's contents if I can not find a solution.
    Is there any fix?
    Or I just have to let go this folder?
    Even folders inside it, like documents or desktops from previous backups are huge in size!

Maybe you are looking for