Reverse work order settlements

Experts,
I need to reverse all the work order settlements that were done in a month due to some error - Appreciate it if someone can let me know how to take care of this.
All answers/inputs/thoughts will be duly appreciated and rewarded with points.
Thanks,
Nandita

KO8G

Similar Messages

KO8G open work order settlement

Hi,
I am facing an issue with open work order settlement using KO8G or KO88.
We are on 6.0 and PSM turned and New GL activated with a document splitting on fund mandatory flag turned on.
When open work orders undergo WIP calculation through KKAI, it shows the the calculated amount in the GL account but when we execute KO88 or KO8G to settle this open work order amount to the GL, it gives me the below error
GLT2201 "Balancing field "Fund" in line item 001 not filled"
On debugging the KO88, its seen that the field fund does not flow in from the work order.
This means that both my P&L accounts and my balance sheet accounts that offset the WIP posting does not have the fund field (which is a mandatory field for posting any document in the system).
Has anyone come across such a situation?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Pradeep
Edited by: Pradeep Giri on May 30, 2009 4:07 AM

Hey Vanessa,
Sorry i have been really busy with work off late. I just got a moment and wanted to thank you for the help.
I found a solution for it, we had FMDERIVE default the fund on the accounts used in WIP settlement as they are dedicated for those process.
The cost is picked from the order and deposited on the P&L account which is now attached to the fund and this is further transferred to the balance sheet account with the fund information.
Problem solved.
Do you see any other implications on this?
Thanks again.
Pradeep

Open Work Order settlement - KO8G or KO88

Hi,
I am facing an issue with open work order settlement using KO8G or KO88.
We are on 6.0 and PSM turned and New GL activated with a document splitting on fund mandatory flag turned on.
When open work orders undergo WIP calculation through KKAI, it shows the the calculated amount in the GL account but when we execute KO88 or KO8G to settle this open work order amount to the GL, it gives me the below error
GLT2201 "Balancing field "Fund" in line item 001 not filled"
On debugging the KO88, its seen that the field fund does not flow in from the work order.
This means that both my P&L accounts and my balance sheet accounts that offset the WIP posting does not have the fund field (which is a mandatory field for posting any document in the system).
Has anyone come across such a situation?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Pradeep

Ashok,
Thanks for the reply.
We have a user exit to populate the order during its creation. this means the fund field is already residing on the order. so during settlement process, closed orders dont have a problem but when open orders are subject to settlement i.e WIP settlement, the cost on the order is not transferred to the GL account because of the fund missing as our financial statements should be balances by fund.
Do you think an user exit can suffice this ? have you ever tried or come across such a scenario.
Thanks
Pradeep

Work order SETTLEMENT RULE Error

Workflow Work order SETTLEMENT RULE Error, but settlement is done no problem in updation. But notification error there.
Notification of completion cannot be generated
Problems occurred when generating a mail
Error '9' when calling service 'SO_OBJECT_SEND'
Error handling for work item 000112476185
Work item 000112476185: Object 000020154849 method UPDATESETTLEMENTRULE cannot be executed
Call transaction was canceled.
No errors occurred -> Details in long text
No errors occurred -> Details in long text
Please advice what could be the reason this error.
Best Regards,
Prabhakar

Message no. WL821
Message no. FD009
Message no. WL863
Problems occurred when generating a mail
Message no. SWF_RUN534
Error handling for work item 000133673828
Message no. SWF_RUN630
Error '9' when calling service 'SO_OBJECT_SEND'
Message no. SWF_RUN535
Thanks,
Prabhakar

Defaulting G/L account in work order settlement rule

Hello,
I have set my work order settlement profile, the default object to be G/L. However, in the equipment master record, at the Organization tab (account assignment group), i don't see any field for G/L account.
When i create settlement rule with default, i get error that rule cannot be created with default.
Where can i enter the G/L account in the equipment master to enable the auto settlement rule creation?

you can always explain the concept of FI account through Cost Center and CO account through Cost Element from Plant Maintenance and FI/CO organisation point of view and in relation to business process.
As you cant define in master data you cant get it automatically copied into settlement rule and hence have to maintain it manually as system dont know which GL to use as settlement receiver as not maintained in master data.

Work order settlement issue

Hi
I am not an expert in Work orders and appreciate your input.
A work order has been settled to a Sales order ( I can't understand the logic behind settling to a Sales Order). The Profit centre assigned to the sales order is wrong. I.e. they need it to be the same as that in the work order.
1) Is it possible to reverse the settlement and
2) change the profit centre in the Sales order
3) Change the settlement rule of the work order
The user informed the reason to settle the work order is just merely to close the work order. Is it mandatory to settle the work order in order to close. If so could you please explain the logic behind the requirement?
Thanks & Regards
Nadini

Hey Vanessa,
Sorry i have been really busy with work off late. I just got a moment and wanted to thank you for the help.
I found a solution for it, we had FMDERIVE default the fund on the accounts used in WIP settlement as they are dedicated for those process.
The cost is picked from the order and deposited on the P&L account which is now attached to the fund and this is further transferred to the balance sheet account with the fund information.
Problem solved.
Do you see any other implications on this?
Thanks again.
Pradeep

Work order settled without functional area

Hello All,
We are getting an issue here, business is trying to settle a workorder by posting it through KO8G.
When the posting is done we cannot see the Functional area on the Debit Line (40), and the credit line has the work order, profit center and functional area. As the debit line does not have functional area, the data does not match in BI.
Could anyone please elaborate how can we get the FA on both the lines.
Thanks in Advance,
Tushar Nerlekar

When you issue inventory to service order, the journal entry is
Dr Consumption + Production Order (Functional area derived from order type)
Cr Inventory (B/S account doesn't need CO object assignment)
When the order settles, the accounting entry is:
Dr Consumption + Cost Center (Functional area derived from cost center master data)
Cr Consumption + Production Order (Functional area derived from order type)
In Iw33, check in Go To -> Settlement Rule at header level what is the settlement receiver?

Work Order Settlement Rule Determination

Hi Experts,
For T-code : IW32, can any one suggest any enhancements which triggers during following conditions:
1)While Releasing the Work order.
2)To redetemine settlement Rule i.e. I need to over wrtie a filed in Settlement rule i.e. "Setllement Reciever" with Cost center value.
3) Overwrite the default costcenter value in Location Tab with custom field value.
Thanks in advance,
With regards.

Hi Vani.
You must use either EXIT_SAPLCOIH_009 user exit or must configure workflow (STD object ISUSMORDER) .
Thanx
suresh.

How to reverse Internal Order Settlement Postings

Dear Sir,
We have settled cost of an Internal Order to another Internal Order using Tcode KO88 . Due to some mistake , we want to reverse the posted settlement transactions .
Pl guide us , how can we reverse the same .
Regards
B Mittal

I had execute ko88 in period 3, for internal order type tools,
now I wont to reverse settlement but in period 4,
period 3 is closed.
can I reverse the order with ko88, then with kb21n repost the order for tool to the new one investment order.
now I have also problem with direct activity allocation, I need first reverse direct act all on old order and post it on new type order.
is this process ok=?

Error in servcie work order Settlement

We have tried to process the Settlement for FCOs Service Work Orders and Warranty Contracts but we get the following error message
"Account 6810100 requires an assignment to a CO object".
I have detected that this GL account has been created as cost element from January 2010, but as far I know the GL accounts that belong to settlement process must not be created as cost element.
Now pls help how to resolve this problem
Rgd
Prakash Sharma

Hi
You are right ..
I checked cost element 6810100 user made following change ,
In cost element master from 01.01.2010 to 31.12.9999 .- Cost element category is- 1 Primary costs/cost-reducing revenues and earlier from 01.01.2000 to 31.12.2002 Cost element category is- 22 External settlement and also in default account assignment cost center is not assigned.
I just want to know error is coming because default account assignment is not given and also because of change in cost element category
Rgd Prakash

Reverse Internal Order Settlement

Hi
Is there a possibility to reverse back an Internal Order Settlement which was donr through KO8G
Thanks

Hi,
Yes... Go to the same transaction, go to Menu - Settlement - Reverse and execute the process with the same parameters.
Regards,
Eli

Work Order to cost center settlement with line item detail

Iu2019m having difficulty finding a method to settle from a work order to a cost center with line item detail. When an order is settled with KO88 or KO8G the total value for that work order/cost element combination is combined and posted to the cost center as a lump sum with the description of CTR\######. Users would like to see the individual values that posted to the work order in a cost center report such as KSB1.
I donu2019t see anything in the settlement rule, settlement profile or allocation structure that will allow line item settlement from work order to cost center. Is line item settlement possible when settling to a cost center? Is there an alternate way to see these expenses as line items in KSB1?
Thanks,
Jeff

Thanks Christian,
We've defined an allocation structure that we use for Project System and Work Order settlement and have Receiver Categories established as FXA, CTR and WBS with "by Cost Element" checked. Work order costs do settle to the cost center entered in the settlement rule, the problem is it combines all items values as a single amount when posting to the cost center.
For example:
expenses post to the work order under cost element 500000 for $500, $200, $300 and cost element 600000 for $250 and $250. The settlement rule says to settle to cost center 170000. When the settlement takes place cost center 170000 is debited $1000 to cost element 500000 and $500 to cost element 600000. We would prefer to see individual posting of $500, $200, $300 to 500000 and $250, $250 to 600000.
Thanks,
Jeff

Intercompny billing for maintenance work orders

All,
I have two scenarios dealing with intercompany activities for maintenance work orders. The first scenario involves a maintenance work order in Company B doing work on equipment also in Company B. The work order requires labor services and material from Company A. What is the most efficient way to consume the labor and material into the Company B work order? My client requires intercompany billing anytime labor services and/or material crosses into another company. So for this scenario, should I execute a cross-company labor confirmation and material consumption and then, create intercompany invoicing from this activity? Or, should Company B provide a purchase order to Company A for the labor and material and then, Company A executes intercompany billing to facilitate the correct intercompany financial postings?
The second scenario requires a maintenance work order settlement from Company A to Company B. How should the intercompany billing be done for this? Should I settle to the cost object in company B and then do the intercompany billing? Or, should I settle to a sales document (i.e., debit memo) and then execute the intercompany billing?
Pleases advise.
Thanks!

Alex,
You should be able to use the List edit transaction iw38 to select and print Multiple Orders simultaneosuly. Once you have selected the orders in the Output screen, use the menu path ORDER > PRINT ORDER.
Regards
Narasimhan

Prodn. order settlement

Dear Friends,
we have done the order settlement of period April (i.e.period 1 for fiscal yr 2008) as well as May (i.e.period 2 for fiscal yr 2008).
Now the issue is that our user has not shown the consumption of one of the raw material for FG produced in the April month and now they have done the consumption against that order with posting period of May.
so how can I reverse the order settlement for this particular order.
we have tried through KO88 with different permutations but it is not allowing to do the same.
please revert for this issue as it is on priority basis.
full points will be awarded for the relevent answers.
Regrads
Amitabh

Hi Amit,
You have to cascade the reversals; first reverse May then you can reverse April. I checked out the ERP financials forum and if you search for the 'settlement reverse' thread there, you will find details.
Warm Regards,
Sreekant.

Refurbish work order get settled before this refurbished material returned

Hello guy, can somebody help to analyze the problem I have in our production system.
the problem is that I found a strange thing that one of the refurbishment work order get settlem and the refurbished material is not yet returned back to stock.
And I check the cost report of this work order, and found this cost receiver is material, which means this cost is already posted against material.
I have no idea why this can be settled?
However it is impossible to settle refurbishment work order before refurbished material returning back to stock in my opinion.
Can any one help me, many thanks in advance.

Hi,
The refurbishment order can be settled to material when if it is in System status
DLV- delivered, after GR has been done or
TECO - If the order status is Technically completed
So in your case the order status may be in Teco status so that the cost is settled to Material before u do GR.
So check the System status of the maintenance order.
Reverse the settlement & do GR & settle again to material.
Regards,
Raj

Reverse work order settlements

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for