Review Activity: Approve\Deny Issue

Can someone help me understand what im doing wrong:
I currently have 5 approvers setup under my review activity. I set the Approve threshold to 20% so one person can approve the request. My issue is when someone rejects the request the activity sits until everyone votes.
Why doesn't the rejection process work in the same fashion as the approval process?

Thanks for the quick reply. One of the reasons for so many approvers was due to timezones however since we just need one out of the group to approve or deny the veto option will work. I added the option HAS VETO to all of the approvers. Once approved or
rejected that one vote does it all.
thank you!

Similar Messages

  • Review Activity (RA) Approval Condition is Changing

    Hello everyone,
    I am running SCSM 2012 R2 version 7.5.3079.0 (no CUs).  I am having an odd issue where it seems as though the approval condition is changing on review activities.  I can't seem to figure out if I've done something or if there is something else
    going on.  This is causing some tickets to "stall" and not actually get processed or is delaying actual approvals.
    So as an example, the person who originally designed the system put an Automatic Approval Review Activity at the beginning of every SR.  In the template, the Approval Condition was set to Automatic and there were no reviewers.  All of a sudden
    a reviewer with no name would show up and the approval condition would become unanimous.  I since removed that RA.
    Now there is a similar issue I am finding on my Change Requests (CRs).  I have only done three as we are basically doing dry runs before we convert off our old system.  In my template, I have a review activity that has the six members of our
    change approval board as reviewers.  The members rarely change so I saw no reason to make this dynamic.  The template has the stage set to Approve with an Approval Condition set for Percentage.  The threshold is 66% or 4 of the 6 reviewers. 
    At some point, the approval condition was changed to unanimous.  If I look at the history of the RA, I can see where the activity was created and it says Approval Percentage 66.  The RA went from Pending to In Progress and then about a minute later,
    the approval condition and percentage changed.  The name on that time entry is just one of my service accounts.
    If it helps...here is that process that the CR template follows
    Automatic Review Activity, which has not been an issue so far.
    Runbook Automation Activity - Updates some fields on the CR with information based on fields.  Also modifies the reviewer in the next step to be the Business Owner of a system.
    Business Owner Approval Review Activity - Template is set to unanimous and has one blank reviewer that is updated by the previous runbook.
    Change Approval Board Review Activity - Explained above.
    Runbook Automation Activity - Converts the Change Request to a Release Record.
    I appreciate any and all assistance that someone could provide.

    This is a common issue.... try restarting the following three services: Microsoft Monitoring Agent, System Center Data Access Service, System Center Management Service and deleting your health service cache (Installation Folder/Health Service State) (it
    will regenerate once you restart the services)

  • Approve / reject review activity from mail notification

    Hi SM Expert, 
    It's possible to approve or reject review activities from mail notification on Lotus Notes ?
    Thanks 

    If lotus notes can send e-mails - YES.
    Maybe this helps:
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/servicemanager/archive/2011/02/08/tricky-way-to-handle-review-activity-approvals-with-the-exchange-connector.aspx
    Patrick Wahlmüller

  • Review activity set to notify Affected User of Approval Required - Service Request

    We are trying to setup a new employee on boarding process.   We have a service request form that gathers information.
    We also have a review activity that the affected user (who is the manager on boarding the employee) has to approve when they get a signed confidentiality agreement, etc.
    We cant set Affected User as a Reviewer but the affected user can approve.  
    How can we notify the affected user to review and approve the review activity.
    On the screen shot below it is the first review activity.
    Note:  we have some workflow activity events setup that work when the reviewer is assigned in the template.
    Thanks Lance

    You want to set the affected user of the SR as a reviewer on the RA? In essence approving their own request. Why not just make the signed confidentiality agreement mandatory (cannot create request without it). 
    Anyways you have two ways to go. A custom workflow/scheduled PS-script or a runbook. If you have Orchestrator that is the easiest. Setup a "Monitor Object" that targets new SRs and a criteria that uniquely identifies the SR (Title may do). Then get the related
    user from the SR and add this to the RA as a reviewer. Should be fairly easy to google a blog on specifics on how to do this.
    http://www.scsm.se/?p=895
    and a long one:
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/servicemanager/archive/2012/05/22/working-with-relationships-in-the-scsm-orchestrator-integration-pack.aspx
    http://codebeaver.blogspot.dk/

  • Get user who approve review activity

    Hi, 
    It's possible  to create a notification to notify affected user who approved her review activity ?

    It possible into Powershell or Orchestrator.
    More difficult way is coding own workflow.

  • Approving review activity (notification)

    Hello,
    please help to solve problem with notification.
    I need to recieve notification if someone approve Review Acitivity in the change request, if I am responsible person of service request. I found possible way
    http://www.scsm.se/?p=948 but it did not work for me. I created subscription, exported MP and changed string in the rule section of newly created subscription:
    <Item>$Context/Path[Relationship='CoreActivity!System.WorkItemContainsActivity' SeedRole='Target' TypeConstraint='WorkItem!System.WorkItem']/Path[Relationship='WorkItem!System.WorkItemAffectedUser' TypeConstraint='System!System.User']$</Item>
    but do not work.

    So let me see if I have this straight. you have a change request, which contains a review activity, and when someone approves this review activity, you need the owner of a service request to be notified. I have a few questions:
    How are the change and service request related? is this a unique relationship or the generic "work item affects work item" relationship?
    Are you looking to send a notification when a user votes on a review activity, or when that review activity is marked as approved and the process is ready to continue? This is only an important distinction for review activities that have multiple reviewers.
    Hello,
    for example we have simple service request with review and manual activity in it, if someone approves review activity, AssignedTo user of service request needs to be notified.

  • Review activity -- Send email to reviewers, with mutilple review stages

    I am trying to make a series of review activities.  I want the reviewers to be notified only when their activity is in focus.  I have tried several ways but have ran into issues.
    Method 1:  I had a series of Review activities that ran in sequence.  I created a workflow to run "on update" when the stage changed.  The workflow was to notify the reviewers.  I assumed that it would only notify reviewers
    of the current review activity but it notified all reviewers in all review activities.  I couldnt get passed this issue so I went to method 2.
    Method 2:  I had a review activity that upon completion would run a workflow.  The workflow would initiate a new template that would add the next set of reviewers.  In addition the workflow would notify the reviewers that action was required. 
    The problem is that the original reviewers recieved the email as well.  I only want reviewers who have an action required to get the email.
    Please note that I am fairly new to system center, so if you could provide a little detail to potential solutions that would be great.
    Thanks in advance for your help.

    Thanks for your reply... I sure hope I am doing something wrong.
    1.  I am targeting the RA... I.E. The workflow is set in the activity event workflow config; then Review activity.  I tried it a couple of ways.  One way to target the RA when it changes, and the other is to target a specific RA based on the
    stage (I.E. Changed to approve).  Also this is for change requests, but the concept should be the same.
    2.  I tried a rule that was: "on update; status not equal to in progress"  Which worked, but all Reviewers in all RA's got an email.  The other rule I tried was: on update, stage changed to approve.  Which also worked, but all approvers
    in all RA's got the email.
    3.  Each RA has am independant list of reviewers... If someone is listed more that once, it is because there input is needed at that particular time in the process.
    4.  This may be the answer.... I am going to test now.  I had them all listed one by one, and hadnt investigated the sequential activity "activity"... I.E. I had listed all of my RA's whcih in the flow diagram were sequential, rather thatn using
    the sequential activity "activity".
    I am going to test, Ill respond in a few on my progress.
    Thanks

  • Review Activity - Line manager has not been added as a reviewer

    I have System Center 2012 R2 Service Manager deployed on 3 servers (Management, Datawherhouse and Portal) with Windows Server 2012 R2.
    I notice that review field is empty and line manager account not added as reviewer, when I select check box in review activity for Line manager to approve.
    Abduljalil Abolzahab

    I've noticed some who've run into a similar issue who have the Active Directory relationship established but the users (emphasis on plural) who are being synced via the AD connector inside of SCSM exist in two separate OU's - I only draw this to your attention
    in the event your single AD connector isn't syncing everything
    into SCSM. Because again, while the relationship is correctly defined in AD it's effectively missing inside of SCSM.
    Assuming the above statement is fine, the next thing I'd investigate is the History of that particular RA - presumably from your post I'm led to believe that you may have and the History tab of the RA shows up blank?
    Also, in relation to my first questioncould you check the specific user inside of your Configuration Items inside of SCSM and verify the manager is in fact defined there?
    Adam Dzak

  • Stat machine workflow task workflow status different values on different state activity(Approval level)

    i have developed the State machine workflow in which i am using default workflow task
    i have added one status dropdown and that is having approve or reject that i set using workflow task drop down values
    now my requirement is that when my workflow goes to different approval i need to have different status values in dropdown
    for example
    on manager approval state activity i need to add additional status value forward to legal
    but when it moved to next activity this task status field should show only approve and reject
    in summary i need to have different status values for workflow task when it moved to different state activity(approval levels)
    can we set these status field of task for state machine workflow programtically as well like for different approval level of task i need different status to be set for the dropdown of task status field
    MCTS,ITIL

    Hi Shahid Siddique,
    I have seen a similar thread from you about this issue, create custom form for the seperate form is a considerable workaround, you can have a check whether it works.
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/9baa0c32-1cde-4c58-aa7c-3568ccf0cdc9/different-approval-level-of-task-i-need-different-status-to-be-set-for-the-dropdown-of-task-status?forum=sharepointdevelopmentprevious
    Thanks,
    Qiao Wei
    TechNet Community Support

  • Incident Review activity

    Hi
    In my SCSM 2012 for incidents, i am planning to add review activity so that if any approval is required, it can be approved by the line manager for the created user.
    But if try to add activity, only manual activity is displayed. I need to add Review activity to an incident.
    is it by design that Reviews activity is only for Service request?
    regards Sundaresan.C

    i think the problem here is that you haven't considered the need all the way though. remember that an incident is a user's report of a problem. what does it mean to have someone approve my report of an outlook problem?
    anything that requires approval needs to be a service request, rather then an incident. a service request is a user's request for something; something that can require approval before being delivered.
    it make sense to approve my request for a new computer, it doesn't make sense to approve my report that my computer is on fire; but you might want to reference my incident reporting a computer fire as support for my request for a new computer. 

  • Exchange Connector - Review Activity Votes not updated

    Hi All,
    I have System Center 2012 R2 Service Manager with Exchange Connector 3.0 (last version, incl bug fix).
    I have configured Exchange Connector to check emails in Office365 Mailbox. I've created Run As Account (named O356 RAS) with username of the cloud mailbox user "o365domain.cz\leaservice" (email [email protected]). Our internal domain is
    not the same! it is domain.local.
    When I create Service Request with Review Activity and I try to Approve this RA by email by sending email with:
    From: [email protected]
    To: [email protected]
    Subject: [RA12345]
    Body: [Approved]
    nothing happens. I've configured the EWS logging in the registry to level 7, so I can monitor the Exchange Connector in Eventlog. I can see that the connector can see the incoming approval email and process it, because email is deleted in mailbox and in
    RA history I can see related object to O365 RAS. But the vote is not processed, Decision Field contains "Not Yet Voted"
    RA is in status "In Progress"
    The same email status change for Manual Activity is working!!!! I'm using status [Completed] and everything works just fine.
    I have problem only with Review Activities... Any ideas pls?
    Thanks
    Jan Marek MCT | MCITP | MCTS

    I fixed it! Workflow Account's AD User has to use the same email address as the Exchange Connector.
    I've been using email [email protected] for SCSM workflow account and as the reply address in the scsm smtp notification channel and different email [email protected] for exchange connector. this was causing the review activity problem.
    Jan Marek MCT | MCITP | MCTS

  • Create reviewer fails after a create review activity

    I have a runbook where I create a related Review Activity for a Service Request.  The runbook is then has a create reviewer which fails.  Details of the failed object Source Class=Review Activity, Target Class=Reviewer, Relationship Type=Reviewers,
    Source Object Guils {SC Object Guid from "Create Review Activity"}.  It complains that the Object Guid is not an instance of class is not  [System.WorkItem.Activity.ReviewActivity].  However, if I test with a different runbook and
    do a get object on the review activity with the same ID it works.  Is there a known issue when creating reviewers after a create review activity?

    You may be returning the incorrect ID for the Review Activity. I would suggest running it through the Runbook Tester using the step through. Then take a look at the GUIDs that are populates in the in create relationship activity. If you can post a screen
    shot of what is displayed and what your runbook looks like, it would help us assist with troubleshooting.  
    Matthew Dowst |
    Blog | Twitter

  • Review Activity - Change Comments window 256 character limit

    The Comments window for review activities is by default set to a 256 character limit.  We need to change its size so reviewers can fully comment on their approval/rejection of a CR.  As a workaround for now, we have them providing larger comments
    in the Notes section of the CR.  What would be the best approach to customize Comments to meet this need?

    Hi Jalass
    Here's what I meant, not sure if this will satify your requirements, but I suggest it anyways.
    Using the authoring tool, I extended the class and added Larger_Comment_Property. Then I added a text box below the Reviewers section bound to the Larger_Comment_Property that would take as much as 4000 characters. It is not per reviewer but is generally
    available to all.
    Hope this helps
    Jep
    <ManagementPack ContentReadable="true" SchemaVersion="1.1" OriginalSchemaVersion="1.1" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
    <Manifest>
    <Identity>
    <ID>ManagementPack.c09959e1_6a5f_44b7_ab87_b908fe7698f9</ID>
    <Version>1.0.0.0</Version>
    </Identity>
    <Name>ManagementPack.c09959e1_6a5f_44b7_ab87_b908fe7698f9</Name>
    <References>
    <Reference Alias="System">
    <ID>System.Library</ID>
    <Version>7.0.5826.216</Version>
    <PublicKeyToken>31bf3856ad364e35</PublicKeyToken>
    </Reference>
    <Reference Alias="Console">
    <ID>Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.ServiceManager.UI.Console</ID>
    <Version>7.0.5826.881</Version>
    <PublicKeyToken>31bf3856ad364e35</PublicKeyToken>
    </Reference>
    <Reference Alias="Alias_a86cf614_1d8c_48f6_b253_affaf0ab135c">
    <ID>ServiceManager.ConfigurationManagement.Library</ID>
    <Version>7.0.5826.216</Version>
    <PublicKeyToken>31bf3856ad364e35</PublicKeyToken>
    </Reference>
    <Reference Alias="Alias_22563d1d_0396_4b0e_97b5_6de5337e051a">
    <ID>Microsoft.SystemCenter.ConfigurationManager</ID>
    <Version>7.0.5826.216</Version>
    <PublicKeyToken>31bf3856ad364e35</PublicKeyToken>
    </Reference>
    <Reference Alias="Alias_e72e3651_89f4_49a4_8d1c_19047aa29685">
    <ID>Microsoft.Windows.Library</ID>
    <Version>7.0.5826.216</Version>
    <PublicKeyToken>31bf3856ad364e35</PublicKeyToken>
    </Reference>
    <Reference Alias="Alias_7061c26e_00c6_4964_8a68_5e9a32e52d31">
    <ID>Microsoft.Windows.Peripheral.Library</ID>
    <Version>7.0.5826.216</Version>
    <PublicKeyToken>31bf3856ad364e35</PublicKeyToken>
    </Reference>
    <Reference Alias="Alias_9eb0a66e_dcf3_476d_a312_d7303289c8fe">
    <ID>System.WorkItem.Library</ID>
    <Version>7.0.5826.216</Version>
    <PublicKeyToken>31bf3856ad364e35</PublicKeyToken>
    </Reference>
    <Reference Alias="Alias_39466dd4_7b01_43d6_ba01_466ce609474b">
    <ID>System.SupportingItem.Library</ID>
    <Version>7.0.5826.216</Version>
    <PublicKeyToken>31bf3856ad364e35</PublicKeyToken>
    </Reference>
    <Reference Alias="Alias_51d1ed89_a3fd_4afd_95a7_cd1962953b58">
    <ID>System.Knowledge.Library</ID>
    <Version>7.0.5826.216</Version>
    <PublicKeyToken>31bf3856ad364e35</PublicKeyToken>
    </Reference>
    <Reference Alias="Alias_5b72c892_41dd_4326_bb46_b316d40dd43e">
    <ID>System.WorkItem.Activity.Library</ID>
    <Version>7.0.5826.216</Version>
    <PublicKeyToken>31bf3856ad364e35</PublicKeyToken>
    </Reference>
    <Reference Alias="Alias_8dec2ae6_68ee_437c_a759_307bbd5a4ca6">
    <ID>ServiceManager.ChangeManagement.Library</ID>
    <Version>7.0.5826.216</Version>
    <PublicKeyToken>31bf3856ad364e35</PublicKeyToken>
    </Reference>
    <Reference Alias="WorkItem">
    <ID>System.WorkItem.ChangeRequest.Library</ID>
    <Version>7.0.5826.216</Version>
    <PublicKeyToken>31bf3856ad364e35</PublicKeyToken>
    </Reference>
    <Reference Alias="Alias_a4248b67_19f4_4fc3_bd63_e0c3c2a298d5">
    <ID>ServiceManager.ProblemManagement.Library</ID>
    <Version>7.0.5826.216</Version>
    <PublicKeyToken>31bf3856ad364e35</PublicKeyToken>
    </Reference>
    <Reference Alias="WorkItem1">
    <ID>System.WorkItem.Problem.Library</ID>
    <Version>7.0.5826.216</Version>
    <PublicKeyToken>31bf3856ad364e35</PublicKeyToken>
    </Reference>
    <Reference Alias="Alias_1d1ea05f_7e08_4d0f_b8a2_ab3e1a1fc555">
    <ID>ServiceManager.ActivityManagement.Library</ID>
    <Version>7.0.5826.216</Version>
    <PublicKeyToken>31bf3856ad364e35</PublicKeyToken>
    </Reference>
    </References>
    </Manifest>
    <TypeDefinitions>
    <EntityTypes>
    <ClassTypes>
    <ClassType ID="NewClass_1" Accessibility="Public" Abstract="false" Base="Alias_9eb0a66e_dcf3_476d_a312_d7303289c8fe!System.WorkItem" Hosted="false" Singleton="false" Extension="false">
    <Property ID="Property_10" Type="string" AutoIncrement="false" Key="true" CaseSensitive="false" MaxLength="256" MinLength="0" Required="false" />
    <Property ID="Property_11" Type="enum" AutoIncrement="false" Key="false" CaseSensitive="false" MaxLength="256" MinLength="0" Required="false" EnumType="Alias_5b72c892_41dd_4326_bb46_b316d40dd43e!ApprovalEnum" />
    </ClassType>
    <ClassType ID="ClassExtension_210829b0_39b3_4022_969a_0bfd171e5e2c" Accessibility="Public" Abstract="false" Base="Alias_5b72c892_41dd_4326_bb46_b316d40dd43e!System.WorkItem.Activity.ReviewActivity" Hosted="false" Singleton="false" Extension="true">
    <Property ID="Larger_Comment_Property" Type="string" AutoIncrement="false" Key="false" CaseSensitive="false" MaxLength="4000" MinLength="0" Required="false" />
    </ClassType>
    </ClassTypes>
    <TypeProjections>
    <TypeProjection ID="CustomForm_710c2cf6_93ec_4f89_a3c4_eab2c6afa7a1_TypeProjection" Accessibility="Public" Type="Alias_5b72c892_41dd_4326_bb46_b316d40dd43e!System.WorkItem.Activity.ReviewActivity">
    <Component Path="$Context/Path[Relationship='Alias_5b72c892_41dd_4326_bb46_b316d40dd43e!System.WorkItemContainsActivity' SeedRole='Target']$" Alias="ParentWorkItem" />
    <Component Path="$Context/Path[Relationship='Alias_9eb0a66e_dcf3_476d_a312_d7303289c8fe!System.WorkItemCreatedByUser']$" Alias="ActivityCreatedBy" />
    <Component Path="$Context/Path[Relationship='Alias_9eb0a66e_dcf3_476d_a312_d7303289c8fe!System.WorkItemAssignedToUser']$" Alias="ActivityAssignedTo" />
    <Component Path="$Context/Path[Relationship='Alias_5b72c892_41dd_4326_bb46_b316d40dd43e!System.ReviewActivityHasReviewer']$" Alias="Reviewer">
    <Component Path="$Context/Path[Relationship='Alias_5b72c892_41dd_4326_bb46_b316d40dd43e!System.ReviewerIsUser']$" Alias="User" />
    <Component Path="$Context/Path[Relationship='Alias_5b72c892_41dd_4326_bb46_b316d40dd43e!System.ReviewerVotedByUser']$" Alias="VotedBy" />
    </Component>
    </TypeProjection>
    </TypeProjections>
    </EntityTypes>
    </TypeDefinitions>
    <Categories>
    <Category ID="ManagementPack.c09959e1_6a5f_44b7_ab87_b908fe7698f9.Category" Value="Console!Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.ServiceManager.ManagementPack">
    <ManagementPackName>ManagementPack.c09959e1_6a5f_44b7_ab87_b908fe7698f9</ManagementPackName>
    <ManagementPackVersion>1.0.0.0</ManagementPackVersion>
    </Category>
    </Categories>
    <Presentation>
    <Forms>
    <Form ID="CustomForm_710c2cf6_93ec_4f89_a3c4_eab2c6afa7a1" Accessibility="Public" Target="CustomForm_710c2cf6_93ec_4f89_a3c4_eab2c6afa7a1_TypeProjection" BaseForm="Alias_1d1ea05f_7e08_4d0f_b8a2_ab3e1a1fc555!Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.ServiceManager.ActivityManagement.Forms.ReviewActivityForm" TypeName="Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.ServiceManager.ActivityManagement.Forms.ReviewActivityForm">
    <Category>Form</Category>
    <Customization>
    <Resize Type="BottomLeft" X="2" Y="-59">
    <Element Name="LayoutRoot/Index:0" />
    </Resize>
    <PropertyChange Object="reviewerListview" Property="Margin">
    <NewValue>0,0,0,30</NewValue>
    </PropertyChange>
    <AddControl Parent="generalTabItem/Index:1/Index:0/Index:13" Assembly="PresentationFramework, Version=3.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35" Type="System.Windows.Controls.TextBox" Left="10" Top="260.055" Right="677" Bottom="1" Row="1" Column="0" />
    <PropertyChange Object="TextBox_1" Property="Text">
    <NewValue></NewValue>
    </PropertyChange>
    <PropertyBindingChange Object="TextBox_1" Property="Text">
    <NewBinding Enabled="True" Path="Larger_Comment_Property" Mode="Default" BindsDirectlyToSource="False" UpdateSourceTrigger="Default" />
    </PropertyBindingChange>
    <PropertyChange Object="TextBox_1" Property="HorizontalAlignment">
    <NewValue>Left</NewValue>
    </PropertyChange>
    <PropertyChange Object="TextBox_1" Property="Margin">
    <NewValue>10,260.055,0,1</NewValue>
    </PropertyChange>
    <PropertyChange Object="TextBox_1" Property="VerticalAlignment">
    <NewValue>Bottom</NewValue>
    </PropertyChange>
    <PropertyChange Object="TextBox_1" Property="Margin">
    <NewValue>10,0,0,1</NewValue>
    </PropertyChange>
    <Resize Type="TopRight" X="-677" Y="7">
    <Element Name="TextBox_1" />
    </Resize>
    <PropertyChange Object="TextBox_1" Property="Margin">
    <NewValue>10,254,0,1</NewValue>
    </PropertyChange>
    <PropertyChange Object="TextBox_1" Property="HorizontalAlignment">
    <NewValue>Stretch</NewValue>
    </PropertyChange>
    <PropertyChange Object="TextBox_1" Property="Width">
    <NewValue>Auto</NewValue>
    </PropertyChange>
    <PropertyChange Object="TextBox_1" Property="Margin">
    <NewValue>10,0,0,1</NewValue>
    </PropertyChange>
    <Move X="10" Y="-1.39999999999839">
    <Element Name="TextBox_1" />
    </Move>
    <PropertyChange Object="TextBox_1" Property="Margin">
    <NewValue>0,255,10,-0.399999999998386</NewValue>
    </PropertyChange>
    <PropertyChange Object="TextBox_1" Property="Margin">
    <NewValue>0,0,10,-0.399999999998386</NewValue>
    </PropertyChange>
    <PropertyChange Object="TextBox_1" Property="Margin">
    <NewValue>0,0,10,0</NewValue>
    </PropertyChange>
    <PropertyChange Object="TextBox_1" Property="Margin">
    <NewValue>0,0,0,0</NewValue>
    </PropertyChange>
    <PropertyChange Object="LayoutRoot/Index:0" Property="Margin">
    <NewValue>-2,20,0,0</NewValue>
    </PropertyChange>
    <PropertyChange Object="LayoutRoot/Index:0" Property="Margin">
    <NewValue>0,20,0,0</NewValue>
    </PropertyChange>
    </Customization>
    </Form>
    </Forms>
    </Presentation>
    <LanguagePacks>
    <LanguagePack ID="ENU" IsDefault="true">
    <DisplayStrings>
    <DisplayString ElementID="ManagementPack.c09959e1_6a5f_44b7_ab87_b908fe7698f9">
    <Name>ManagementPack.c09959e1_6a5f_44b7_ab87_b908fe7698f9</Name>
    </DisplayString>
    <DisplayString ElementID="NewClass_1">
    <Name>NewClass_1</Name>
    <Description>Specify your class description.</Description>
    </DisplayString>
    <DisplayString ElementID="NewClass_1" SubElementID="Property_10">
    <Name>Property_10</Name>
    </DisplayString>
    <DisplayString ElementID="NewClass_1" SubElementID="Property_11">
    <Name>Property_11</Name>
    </DisplayString>
    <DisplayString ElementID="CustomForm_710c2cf6_93ec_4f89_a3c4_eab2c6afa7a1">
    <Name>Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.ServiceManager.ActivityManagement.Forms.ReviewActivityForm (Customized)</Name>
    <Description>Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.ServiceManager.ActivityManagement.Forms.ReviewActivityForm (Customized)</Description>
    </DisplayString>
    <DisplayString ElementID="ClassExtension_210829b0_39b3_4022_969a_0bfd171e5e2c">
    <Name>Extension of Review Activity</Name>
    <Description>Extension of class Review Activity</Description>
    </DisplayString>
    <DisplayString ElementID="ClassExtension_210829b0_39b3_4022_969a_0bfd171e5e2c" SubElementID="Larger_Comment_Property">
    <Name>Larger_Comment_Property</Name>
    </DisplayString>
    </DisplayStrings>
    </LanguagePack>
    </LanguagePacks>
    </ManagementPack>

  • How do I add a Voter to a Review Activity on a Service Request from an AD User Query on the Request Offering?

    I have the query set-up and it works fine, but I cannot map it to anything, I suppose because it is an object and not a simple string. I think I get the option to Map it to related items or configuration items in the Query itself maybe, I seem to remember
    seeing that, but I can not map it to anywhere on the Service Request or Activities in the Request Offering Set-Up.
    However, looking at my Update Object Activity in My Runbook, I do not see how to add a person to a review activity anyway.
    Can someone enlighten me?
    I do not know Powershell well enough to use it with SCSM or Orchestrator yet, and I am not even sure if we have SMLets so keep it simple if possible.
    Thanks for any assistance!

    More info:
    How to add a Reviewer to a Review Activity through Orchestrator
    http://www.scsm.se/?p=895
    Note: Microsoft provides third-party contact information to help you find technical support. This contact information may change without notice. Microsoft does not guarantee the accuracy of this third-party contact information.
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]

  • Can I insert the name poperty of the RequestedByUser related object of the parent Change Request workitem in a review activity email notification template?

    I am working on a SCSM change control workflow driven by email. 
    A lot of my work is based on the information found in this post:
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/servicemanager/archive/2012/04/03/using-data-properties-from-the-parent-work-items-in-activity-email-templates.aspx#pi158453=4
    This is an excellent post to which my Internet searches continually return. The workflow is about 90% complete. 
    My question is can I insert the properties of a related object of the parent workitem in a workflow email notification? 
    For example, I want to include the name property of the RequestedByUser related object of the parent workitem object in a review activity notification.

    Thank you for your reply.  I have confirmed my template is using a projection that includes the parent workitem and requested by user.  Where I am having trouble is the notification template syntax used to call the properties of the related
    object of the parent workitem.  The picker in the GUI won't show that related object, so I have no example to follow.  I hope this reply makes sense!

Maybe you are looking for