RF-Implement without Warehouse Configuration.

Hi Friends,
We are planning to implement RF at client location . They donu2019t have warehouse right now. They haev very simple procurement ; from PO u2013 GR at storage level only.
Please let me know "Can we Implement RF without having the Warehouse if yes what challenges will come up?
Or have to go with lean warehouse for passing values in LM01 screens.. as Warehouse looks Mandatory ."
Does we require XI/ PI interface for RF implementation ?
Regards,
Lalit
Edited by: lalit sharma on Sep 3, 2010 8:17 AM

Hi,
Your requirement was for RF transactions wihtout warehouse implemenation
So dummy warehouse is just a warehouse number without anything in it - storage type, sections or bins
1. For dummy warehouse, Bins are requried ? if yes thn material master has to be extended. - when there is no WM implemenation, BINs are not required and hence material need not be extended.
2. If you have dummy warehouse , GR cant be posted untill warehouse mgt ( material) - GR done till IM Location only
because you may or may not assign dummy warehouse to a dummy storage location which is not used for any inventory purpose
3. Dummy warehouse is something like Lean WM? - Dummy Whse is just a code used for RF purpose
4. If need to take Lt31 printout , will have problem if warehouse activated? - Without WM implemenation LT31 is not possible.
dummy warehouse to a dummy stor location does not impact anything as far as dummy location is not used
howere assignment is not mandatory
Regds

Similar Messages

Handling unit mangement without Warehouse management

Hello,
We are working on a scenario,wherein we are planning to use handling unit management without warehouse management.Does HU management and WM go hand in hand?
Do you foresee any inconsistencies if HU management is implemented without WM?
What does SAP recommend?
Thanks,
Pankaj

Hello,
WM and HU functionality are independent solutions. WM and HU could be implemented based on your business scenarios. It is pretty common to have WM and HU solutions for the business.
It will be sort of difficult to answer about inconsistency in HU solution without WM. Based on what process you define and what are the intricacies involved you may or may not have true inconsistencies.
You could refer to the SAP best practices help library and see if for your business scenario SAP has a solution and that way you could best define an integrated solution.
Hope this helps.
Thanks,

Picking list generation without Warehouse management

Hi all,
I have requirement for my client to generate picking list genereation without wm. so i assigned EK00 condition type, transmission medium, Language, send time & picking confirmation in shipping point. Also created condition record in VP01SHP tcode but still unable to generate output for picking in VL70.
Please suggest !
Thanks & Regards,
Shakti

Following 2 recently discussed SDN thread will be help to you:
- Re: We use picking option without warehouse management installed
- picking without warehouse management
Regards
JP

Direct connection between 2 clients without any configuration!

I wan to make a system act like hamachi or logmein (websever & clients).
I have a webserver on the internet and two client from different networks connected to this webserver, now i want to make directly connection between these clients without any configuration on router. I think it is possible because all infomation about clients network could be got from http request which they send to server. But i don't know what exact fields in the header of http request that i need and how to set them to create connection between clients. I need some ideas about this issue.
Edited by: tulous on Nov 20, 2008 7:40 PM
Edited by: tulous on Nov 20, 2008 7:41 PM

tulous wrote:
I know, so if you want to use a remote control tool such as: VNC, remote desktop you must config on router or server. But even if you had a proxy(permit port 80) when you type www.sun.com you will get data from it, this data was sent from Sun to your proxy and in some way the data was return to your browser. So i think if we have enough information(it come from the webserver) we could init a connection between 2 client. An example of this is Hamachi.
At first 2 hamachi clients connect to a server of hamachi, when they have their id, a tunnel between 2 clients was established without any configuration on proxy(certainly that server did not deny port of hamachi). From now 2 clients can exchange data not through the server. The same in logmein, you can remote desktop any where with zero configuration, but the speed is guarantee because they contact to server for query information, but the data was transmited directly. Sorry if i make mistake.It doesn't work the way you think.
There is a proxy or you have to have one side listening with a ServerSocket and have ports opened as needed. You can't create a Socket connection on server A between clients B and C and then pass it off to clients B and C and magically they just talk to each other.
It does not work that way. It is impossible to do it that way.

Reducing your implementation time with Configuration Express Wizard

Dear B1 community,
recently a new tool has been published on the SDN which may help you to reduce the implementation time of SAP Business One 2005 A SP01.
It is provided as a non-supported version and you can download it here: https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/0033074f-9958-2a10-9cb0-ad9f75622b40.
The package contains: The Configuration Express Wizard, a presentation explaining how to use the tool, and two webex sessions for more details.
Try it - we are curious on your feedback.
Regards,
Markus

Hi guys
I've tried all links given here, but none of them are working properly. I've tried saving and opening, but either way I got a corrupted file.
Is there any other way I can download it?
I actually have CEW, but I think it is the old version, so I'm getting the following message:
Wrong digital signature for add-on installer
I supposed that the new version would fix this, according to this post:
Reducing your implementation time with Configuration Express Wizard
Can anyone help? I really needed this to do a presentation on thursday!
Thanks!!

Implementing Decentralized Warehouse Management (LE-IDW)

My company recently acquired another business. The acquired company is on SAP. In order to integrate the business more quickly without having to do a complete SAP overhaul at this moment, we are planning to implement LE-IDW (Decentralized Warehouse Management).
Using this tool we plan to connect the other SAP system which handles the distribution, warehousing and manufacturing plant by using ALE.
Because both companies operate in different company codes, the idea is to leave ownership of the finished goods with the distribution company until the goods have been shipped to the customer and invoiced to the selling company.
This would require that we use some level of IM in the distribution company (i.e. the decentralized warehouse). The stock would be valuated in the distribution company not in the selling company.
Out of the box LE-IDW is only set up to handle WM functions even though it uses deliveries to correspond to the other system. We would use the deliveries also to update the IM side of the distributing company.
Does anyone have experience using LE-IDW this way? If so, I would be interested in your experiences.
Thank you.

Dear Sandar
Sorry .We used <b>MIGO BAPI </b> trigger the goods movement.
You will face some problem in cycle counting .
We used 4.6c.
We make GR /GI using MIGO .
Cycle count we use default one.
We used SAP standard message type.
but change in inbound and outbound you have to do more testing.
Check this link .This may be very useful for you.
help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/LEIDW/LEIDW.pdf - Similar pages
http://www.sap-img.com/lg001.htm

Logging in without BI Configuration file

Is there any sample for using BI Beans without configuration file? I tried to create all objects (BISession, BIUser, MetadataManager, connections) and link them, but reached NullPointerAssignment and simular errors only.

This is a code extract from a Java Client sample that you should be able to integrate into a JSP environment:
* Connects to the OLAP service and BI Beans Catalog using connection
* information from the BI Configuration file and from the BIConectionDialog.
protected void connect() {
* Try to connect to the catalog based on the information collected in method
* showConnectDialog()
* - File based must be a valid directory (validated in showConnectDialog())
* - Database must be a valid connection. The OLAP user will be the catalog
* user. If the OLAP user is not a Catalog user - add user to the catalog
* - The assumption here is that if the user is utilizing the database catalog,
* then the database catalog is in the same database instance as the OLAP data
* If unable to connect, tell user what to do to set up connection
// set up the session
if (m_session != null) {
try {
m_session.disconnect();
catch (Exception e) {
System.out.println("Unable to disconnect from session.");
m_session = null;
m_session = new BISession();
DefaultErrorHandler _handler = new DefaultErrorHandler();
handler.setDebugMode(DefaultErrorHandler.SHOWNONE);
m_session.addErrorHandler(_handler);
// use the OLAP user for the BI User. This means the OLAP user must be a valid
// user in the catalog
m_session.setBIUser(new BIUser(m_OLAPUserName.getText()));
try {
m_session.connect();
catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
MetadataManager _mm = null;
Connection olapCon = null;
Connection catalogCon = null;
* Try to connect to OLAP
try {
olapCon = getOLAPConnection();
catch (ConnectionException ce) {
showConnectionError(ce);
return;
* Try to connect to the catalog
catalogCon = getCatalogConnection();
if (catalogCon == null)
return;
try {
* Create MetadataManager based on the two connections above
* (this is set up automatically when connection details are read from
* a configuration file)
_mm = new MetadataManager();
mm.setSession(msession);
// The MetadataManager will merge details from OLAP and the Catalog
_mm.setConnection(olapCon);
_mm.setConnection(catalogCon);
_mm.attach();
//Now that we're successfully connected, cache key properties
m_metadataManager = _mm;
m_queryManager = new QueryManager();
m_queryManager.setSession(m_session);
m_queryManager.setMetadataManager(m_metadataManager);
m_connected = true;
// Save the connection details
saveConnectionSettings();
catch (Exception e) {
AnalyzerUtilities au = new AnalyzerUtilities(m_analyzer);
au.showErrorMessage(null, e);
Hope this helps
Business Intelligence Beans Product Management Team
Oracle Corporation

What are the best solutions for data warehouse configuration in 10gR2

I need help on solutions to be provided to my Client for upgrading the data warehouse.
Current Configuration: Oracle database 9.2.0.8. This database contains the data warehouse and one more data mart on the same host.Sizes are respectively 6 Terabyte(retention policy of 3 years+current year) and 1 Terabyte. The ETL tool and BO Reporting tools are also hosted on the same host. This current configuration is really performing poor.
Client cannot go for a major architectural or configuration changes to its existing environment now due to some constraints.
However, they have agreed to separate out the databases on separate hosts from the ETL tools and BO objects. Also we are planning to upgrade the database to 10gR2 to attain stability, better performance and overcome current headaches.
We cannot upgrade the database to 11g as the BO is at a version 6.5 which isn't compatible with Oracle 11g. And Client cannot afford to upgrade anything else other than the database.
So, my role is very vital in providing a perfect solution towards better performance and take a successful migration of Oracle Database from one host to another (similar platform and OS) in addition to upgrade.
I have till now thought of the following:
Move the Oracle database and data mart to separate host.
The host will be the same platform, that is, HP Superdome with HP-UX 32-bit OS (we cannot change to 64-bit as ETL tool doesn't support)
Install new Oracle database 10g on the new host and move the data to it.
Exploring all new features of 10gR2 to help data warehouse, that is, SQL MODEL Clause introduction, Parallel processing, Partitioning, Data Pump, SPA to study pre and post migrations.
Also thinking of RAC to provide more better solution as our main motive is to show a tremendous performance enhancement.
I need all your help to prepare a good road map for my assignment. Please suggest.
Thanks,
Tapan

SGA=27.5 GB and PGA=50 MB
Also I am pasting part of STATSPACK Report, eliminating the snaps of DB bounce. Please suggest the scope of improvement in this case.
STATSPACK report for
Snap Id Snap Time Sessions Curs/Sess Comment
Begin Snap: 582946 11-Mar-13 20:02:16 46 12.8
End Snap: 583036 12-Mar-13 18:24:24 60 118.9
Elapsed: 1,342.13 (mins)
Cache Sizes (end)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Buffer Cache: 21,296M Std Block Size: 16K
Shared Pool Size: 6,144M Log Buffer: 16,384K
Load Profile
~~~~~~~~~~~~ Per Second Per Transaction
Redo size: 1,343,739.01 139,883.39
Logical reads: 100,102.54 10,420.69
Block changes: 3,757.42 391.15
Physical reads: 6,670.84 694.44
Physical writes: 874.34 91.02
User calls: 1,986.04 206.75
Parses: 247.87 25.80
Hard parses: 5.82 0.61
Sorts: 1,566.76 163.10
Logons: 10.99 1.14
Executes: 1,309.79 136.35
Transactions: 9.61
% Blocks changed per Read: 3.75 Recursive Call %: 43.34
Rollback per transaction %: 3.49 Rows per Sort: 190.61
Instance Efficiency Percentages (Target 100%)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Buffer Nowait %: 99.90 Redo NoWait %: 100.00
Buffer Hit %: 96.97 In-memory Sort %: 100.00
Library Hit %: 99.27 Soft Parse %: 97.65
Execute to Parse %: 81.08 Latch Hit %: 99.58
Parse CPU to Parse Elapsd %: 3.85 % Non-Parse CPU: 99.34
Shared Pool Statistics Begin End
Memory Usage %: 7.11 50.37
% SQL with executions>1: 62.31 46.46
% Memory for SQL w/exec>1: 26.75 13.47
Top 5 Timed Events
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ % Total
Event Waits Time (s) Ela Time
CPU time 492,062 43.66
db file sequential read 157,418,414 343,549 30.49
library cache pin 92,339 66,759 5.92
PX qref latch 63,635 43,845 3.89
db file scattered read 2,506,806 41,677 3.70
Background Wait Events for DB: P7IN1 Instance: P7IN1 Snaps: 582946 -583036
-> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last)
Avg
Total Wait wait Waits
Event Waits Timeouts Time (s) (ms) /txn
log file sequential read 176,386 0 3,793 22 0.2
log file parallel write 2,685,833 0 1,813 1 3.5
db file parallel write 239,166 0 1,350 6 0.3
control file parallel write 33,432 0 79 2 0.0
LGWR wait for redo copy 478,120 536 75 0 0.6
rdbms ipc reply 10,027 0 47 5 0.0
control file sequential read 32,414 0 40 1 0.0
db file scattered read 4,101 0 30 7 0.0
db file sequential read 13,946 0 29 2 0.0
direct path read 203,694 0 14 0 0.3
log buffer space 363 0 13 37 0.0
latch free 3,766 0 9 2 0.0
direct path write 80,491 0 6 0 0.1
async disk IO 351,955 0 4 0 0.5
enqueue 28 0 1 21 0.0
buffer busy waits 1,281 0 1 0 0.0
log file single write 172 0 0 1 0.0
rdbms ipc message 10,563,204 251,286 992,837 94 13.7
pmon timer 34,751 34,736 78,600 2262 0.0
smon timer 7,462 113 76,463 10247 0.0
Instance Activity Stats for DB: P7IN1 Instance: P7IN1 Snaps: 582946 -583036
Statistic Total per Second per Trans
CPU used by this session 49,206,154 611.0 63.6
CPU used when call started 49,435,735 613.9 63.9
CR blocks created 6,740,777 83.7 8.7
Cached Commit SCN referenced 423,253,503 5,256.0 547.2
Commit SCN cached 19,165 0.2 0.0
DBWR buffers scanned 48,276,489 599.5 62.4
DBWR checkpoint buffers written 6,959,752 86.4 9.0
DBWR checkpoints 454 0.0 0.0
DBWR free buffers found 44,817,183 556.5 57.9
DBWR lru scans 137,149 1.7 0.2
DBWR make free requests 162,528 2.0 0.2
DBWR revisited being-written buff 4,220 0.1 0.0
DBWR summed scan depth 48,276,489 599.5 62.4
DBWR transaction table writes 5,036 0.1 0.0
DBWR undo block writes 2,989,436 37.1 3.9
DDL statements parallelized 3,723 0.1 0.0
DFO trees parallelized 4,157 0.1 0.0
DML statements parallelized 3 0.0 0.0
OS Block input operations 29,850 0.4 0.0
OS Block output operations 1,591 0.0 0.0
OS Characters read/written 182,109,814,791 2,261,447.1 235,416.9
OS Integral unshared data size ################## 242,463,432.4 ############
OS Involuntary context switches 188,257,786 2,337.8 243.4
OS Maximum resident set size 43,518,730,619 540,417.4 56,257.5
OS Page reclaims 159,430,953 1,979.8 206.1
OS Signals received 5,260,938 65.3 6.8
OS Socket messages received 79,438,383 986.5 102.7
OS Socket messages sent 93,064,176 1,155.7 120.3
OS System time used 10,936,430 135.8 14.1
OS User time used 132,043,884 1,639.7 170.7
OS Voluntary context switches 746,207,739 9,266.4 964.6
PX local messages recv'd 55,120,663 684.5 71.3
PX local messages sent 55,120,817 684.5 71.3
Parallel operations downgraded 1 3 0.0 0.0
Parallel operations not downgrade 4,154 0.1 0.0
SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client 155,422,335 1,930.0 200.9
SQL*Net roundtrips to/from dblink 18 0.0 0.0
active txn count during cleanout 16,529,551 205.3 21.4
background checkpoints completed 43 0.0 0.0
background checkpoints started 43 0.0 0.0
background timeouts 280,202 3.5 0.4
branch node splits 4,428 0.1 0.0
buffer is not pinned count 6,382,440,322 79,257.4 8,250.7
buffer is pinned count 9,675,661,370 120,152.8 12,507.9
bytes received via SQL*Net from c 67,384,496,376 836,783.4 87,109.3
bytes received via SQL*Net from d 6,142 0.1 0.0
bytes sent via SQL*Net to client 50,240,643,657 623,890.4 64,947.1
bytes sent via SQL*Net to dblink 3,701 0.1 0.0
calls to get snapshot scn: kcmgss 145,385,064 1,805.4 187.9
calls to kcmgas 36,816,132 457.2 47.6
calls to kcmgcs 3,514,770 43.7 4.5
change write time 369,373 4.6 0.5
cleanout - number of ktugct calls 20,954,488 260.2 27.1
cleanouts and rollbacks - consist 6,357,174 78.9 8.2
cleanouts only - consistent read 10,078,802 125.2 13.0
cluster key scan block gets 69,403,565 861.9 89.7
Instance Activity Stats for DB: P7IN1 Instance: P7IN1 Snaps: 582946 -583036
Statistic Total per Second per Trans
cluster key scans 41,311,211 513.0 53.4
commit cleanout failures: block l 413,776 5.1 0.5
commit cleanout failures: buffer 414 0.0 0.0
commit cleanout failures: callbac 41,194 0.5 0.1
commit cleanout failures: cannot 174,382 2.2 0.2
commit cleanouts 11,469,056 142.4 14.8
commit cleanouts successfully com 10,839,290 134.6 14.0
commit txn count during cleanout 17,155,424 213.0 22.2
consistent changes 145,418,277 1,805.8 188.0
consistent gets 8,043,252,188 99,881.4 10,397.7
consistent gets - examination 3,180,028,047 39,489.7 4,110.9
current blocks converted for CR 9 0.0 0.0
cursor authentications 14,926 0.2 0.0
data blocks consistent reads - un 143,706,500 1,784.6 185.8
db block changes 302,577,666 3,757.4 391.2
db block gets 336,562,217 4,179.4 435.1
deferred (CURRENT) block cleanout 2,912,793 36.2 3.8
dirty buffers inspected 627,174 7.8 0.8
enqueue conversions 1,296,337 16.1 1.7
enqueue releases 13,053,200 162.1 16.9
enqueue requests 13,239,092 164.4 17.1
enqueue timeouts 185,878 2.3 0.2
enqueue waits 114,120 1.4 0.2
exchange deadlocks 7,390 0.1 0.0
execute count 105,475,101 1,309.8 136.4
free buffer inspected 1,604,407 19.9 2.1
free buffer requested 258,126,047 3,205.4 333.7
hot buffers moved to head of LRU 22,793,576 283.1 29.5
immediate (CR) block cleanout app 16,436,010 204.1 21.3
immediate (CURRENT) block cleanou 2,860,013 35.5 3.7
index fast full scans (direct rea 12,375 0.2 0.0
index fast full scans (full) 3,733 0.1 0.0
index fast full scans (rowid rang 192,148 2.4 0.3
index fetch by key 1,321,024,486 16,404.5 1,707.7
index scans kdiixs1 406,165,684 5,043.8 525.1
leaf node 90-10 splits 50,373 0.6 0.1
leaf node splits 697,235 8.7 0.9
logons cumulative 884,756 11.0 1.1
messages received 3,276,719 40.7 4.2
messages sent 3,257,171 40.5 4.2
no buffer to keep pinned count 569 0.0 0.0
no work - consistent read gets 4,406,092,172 54,715.0 5,695.8
opened cursors cumulative 20,527,704 254.9 26.5
parse count (failures) 267,088 3.3 0.4
parse count (hard) 468,996 5.8 0.6
parse count (total) 19,960,548 247.9 25.8
parse time cpu 323,024 4.0 0.4
parse time elapsed 8,393,422 104.2 10.9
physical reads 537,189,332 6,670.8 694.4
physical reads direct 292,545,140 3,632.8 378.2
physical writes 70,409,002 874.3 91.0
physical writes direct 59,248,394 735.8 76.6
physical writes non checkpoint 69,103,391 858.1 89.3
pinned buffers inspected 11,893 0.2 0.0
prefetched blocks 95,892,161 1,190.8 124.0
prefetched blocks aged out before 1,495,883 18.6 1.9
Instance Activity Stats for DB: P7IN1 Instance: P7IN1 Snaps: 582946 -583036
Statistic Total per Second per Trans
process last non-idle time ################## ############## ############
queries parallelized 417 0.0 0.0
recursive calls 122,323,299 1,519.0 158.1
recursive cpu usage 3,144,533 39.1 4.1
redo blocks written 180,881,558 2,246.2 233.8
redo buffer allocation retries 5,400 0.1 0.0
redo entries 164,728,513 2,045.6 213.0
redo log space requests 1,006 0.0 0.0
redo log space wait time 2,230 0.0 0.0
redo ordering marks 2,563 0.0 0.0
redo size 108,208,614,904 1,343,739.0 139,883.4
redo synch time 558,520 6.9 0.7
redo synch writes 2,343,824 29.1 3.0
redo wastage 1,126,585,600 13,990.0 1,456.4
redo write time 718,655 8.9 0.9
redo writer latching time 7,763 0.1 0.0
redo writes 2,685,833 33.4 3.5
rollback changes - undo records a 522,742 6.5 0.7
rollbacks only - consistent read 335,177 4.2 0.4
rows fetched via callback 1,100,990,382 13,672.1 1,423.3
session connect time ################## ############## ############
session cursor cache count 1,061 0.0 0.0
session cursor cache hits 1,687,796 21.0 2.2
session logical reads 8,061,057,193 100,102.5 10,420.7
session pga memory 1,573,228,913,832 19,536,421.0 2,033,743.8
session pga memory max 1,841,357,626,496 22,866,054.4 2,380,359.0
session uga memory 1,074,114,630,336 13,338,399.4 1,388,529.0
session uga memory max 386,645,043,296 4,801,374.0 499,823.6
shared hash latch upgrades - no w 410,360,146 5,095.9 530.5
sorts (disk) 2,657 0.0 0.0
sorts (memory) 126,165,625 1,566.7 163.1
sorts (rows) 24,048,783,304 298,638.8 31,088.3
summed dirty queue length 5,438,201 67.5 7.0
switch current to new buffer 1,302,798 16.2 1.7
table fetch by rowid 6,201,503,534 77,010.5 8,016.8
table fetch continued row 26,649,697 330.9 34.5
table scan blocks gotten 1,864,435,032 23,152.6 2,410.2
table scan rows gotten 43,639,997,280 541,923.3 56,414.3
table scans (cache partitions) 26,112 0.3 0.0
table scans (direct read) 246,243 3.1 0.3
table scans (long tables) 340,200 4.2 0.4
table scans (rowid ranges) 359,617 4.5 0.5
table scans (short tables) 9,111,559 113.2 11.8
transaction rollbacks 4,819 0.1 0.0
transaction tables consistent rea 824 0.0 0.0
transaction tables consistent rea 1,386,848 17.2 1.8
user calls 159,931,913 1,986.0 206.8
user commits 746,543 9.3 1.0
user rollbacks 27,020 0.3 0.0
write clones created in backgroun 7 0.0 0.0
write clones created in foregroun 4,350 0.1 0.0
Buffer Pool Statistics for DB: P7IN1 Instance: P7IN1 Snaps: 582946 -583036
-> Standard block size Pools D: default, K: keep, R: recycle
-> Default Pools for other block sizes: 2k, 4k, 8k, 16k, 32k
Free Write Buffer
Number of Cache Buffer Physical Physical Buffer Complete Busy
P Buffers Hit % Gets Reads Writes Waits Waits Waits
D 774,144 95.6############ 233,869,082 10,089,734 0 0########
K 504,000 99.9############ 3,260,227 1,070,338 0 0 65,898
R 63,504 96.2 196,079,539 7,511,863 535 0 0 0
Buffer wait Statistics for DB: P7IN1 Instance: P7IN1 Snaps: 582946 -583036
-> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc
Tot Wait Avg
Class Waits Time (s) Time (ms)
data block 7,791,121 14,676 2
file header block 587 101 172
undo header 151,617 71 0
segment header 299,312 58 0
1st level bmb 45,235 7 0
bitmap index block 392 1 3
undo block 4,250 1 0
2nd level bmb 14 0 0
system undo header 2 0 0
3rd level bmb 1 0 0
Latch Activity for DB: P7IN1 Instance: P7IN1 Snaps: 582946 -583036
->"Get Requests", "Pct Get Miss" and "Avg Slps/Miss" are statistics for
willing-to-wait latch get requests
->"NoWait Requests", "Pct NoWait Miss" are for no-wait latch get requests
->"Pct Misses" for both should be very close to 0.0
Pct Avg Wait Pct
Get Get Slps Time NoWait NoWait
Latch Requests Miss /Miss (s) Requests Miss
Consistent RBA 2,686,230 0.0 0.2 0 0
FAL request queue 86 0.0 0 0
FAL subheap alocation 0 0 2 0.0
FIB s.o chain latch 1,089 0.0 0 0
FOB s.o list latch 4,589,986 0.5 0.0 2 0
NLS data objects 1 0.0 0 0
SQL memory manager worka 5,963 0.0 0 0
Token Manager 0 0 2 0.0
active checkpoint queue 719,439 0.3 0.1 0 1 0.0
alert log latch 184 0.0 0 2 0.0
archive control 4,365 0.0 0 0
archive process latch 1,808 0.6 0.6 0 0
begin backup scn array 3,387,572 0.0 0.0 0 0
cache buffer handles 1,577,222 0.2 0.0 0 0
cache buffers chains ############## 0.5 0.0 430 354,357,972 0.3
cache buffers lru chain 17,153,023 0.1 0.0 1 385,505,654 0.5
cas latch 538,804,153 0.3 0.0 7 0
channel handle pool latc 1,776,950 0.5 0.0 0 0
channel operations paren 2,901,371 0.3 0.0 0 0
checkpoint queue latch 99,329,722 0.0 0.0 0 11,153,369 0.1
child cursor hash table 3,927,427 0.0 0.0 0 0
commit callback allocati 8,739 0.0 0 0
dictionary lookup 7,980 0.0 0 0
dml lock allocation 6,767,990 0.1 0.0 0 0
dummy allocation 1,898,183 0.2 0.1 0 0
enqueue hash chains 27,741,348 0.1 0.1 4 0
enqueues 17,450,161 0.3 0.1 6 0
error message lists 132,828 2.6 0.2 1 0
event group latch 884,066 0.0 0.7 0 0
event range base latch 1 0.0 0 0
file number translation 34 38.2 0.9 0 0
global tx hash mapping 577,859 0.0 0 0
hash table column usage 4,062 0.0 0 8,757,234 0.0
hash table modification 16 0.0 0 2 0.0
i/o slave adaptor 0 0 2 0.0
job workq parent latch 4 100.0 0.3 0 494 8.7
job_queue_processes para 1,950 0.0 0 2 0.0
ksfv messages 0 0 4 0.0
ktm global data 8,219 0.0 0 0
lgwr LWN SCN 2,687,862 0.0 0.0 0 0
library cache 310,882,781 0.9 0.0 34 104,759 4.0
library cache load lock 30,369 0.0 0.3 0 0
library cache pin 153,821,358 0.1 0.0 2 0
library cache pin alloca 126,316,296 0.1 0.0 4 0
list of block allocation 2,730,808 0.3 0.0 0 0
loader state object free 566,036 0.1 0.0 0 0
longop free list parent 197,368 0.0 0 8,390 0.0
message pool operations 14,424 0.0 0.0 0 0
messages 25,931,764 0.1 0.0 1 0
mostly latch-free SCN 40,124,948 0.3 0.0 5 0
Latch Sleep breakdown for DB: P7IN1 Instance: P7IN1 Snaps: 582946 -583036
-> ordered by misses desc
Get Spin &
Latch Name Requests Misses Sleeps Sleeps 1->4
cache buffers chains ############## 74,770,083 1,062,119 73803903/884
159/71439/10
582/0
redo allocation 170,107,983 3,441,055 149,631 3292872/1467
48/1426/9/0
library cache 310,882,781 2,831,747 89,240 2754499/6780
6/7405/2037/
0
shared pool 158,471,190 1,755,922 55,268 1704342/4836
9/2826/385/0
cas latch 538,804,153 1,553,992 6,927 1547125/6808
/58/1/0
row cache objects 161,142,207 1,176,998 27,658 1154070/1952
0/2560/848/0
process queue reference 1,893,917,184 1,119,215 106,454 78758/4351/1
36/0/0
Library Cache Activity for DB: P7IN1 Instance: P7IN1 Snaps: 582946 -583036
->"Pct Misses" should be very low
Get Pct Pin Pct Invali-
Namespace Requests Miss Requests Miss Reloads dations
BODY 3,137,721 0.0 3,137,722 0.0 0 0
CLUSTER 6,741 0.1 4,420 0.2 0 0
INDEX 353,708 0.8 361,065 1.2 0 0
SQL AREA 17,052,073 0.3 54,615,678 0.9 410,682 19,628
TABLE/PROCEDURE 3,521,884 0.2 12,922,737 0.1 619 0
TRIGGER 1,975,977 0.0 1,975,977 0.0 1 0
SGA Memory Summary for DB: P7IN1 Instance: P7IN1 Snaps: 582946 -583036
SGA regions Size in Bytes
Database Buffers 22,330,474,496
Fixed Size 779,288
Redo Buffers 17,051,648
Variable Size 7,180,648,448
sum 29,528,953,880

Lost ability to SSH & Ping without changing configuration

Howdy - hoping someone with a bigger brain than I can help me figure this out. I had a problem with the recent storms wiping out my ADSL & phone line. The phone co. got my line and connection back up, and I can get outbound connections fine (e.g., email & HTTP work fine) but for some reason after the physical repair to my phone line, I can no longer SSH into my home system through my AEX/1000 box.
Prior to the line problem, I enjoyed easy SSH connections via port 22 to my home computer. Now, without changing any configuration (and verifying that all configurations are identical to the condition they were in prior to the outage), I can no longer tunnel into my home computer, nor ping the IP (dyndns - it's always worked flawlessly for me).
And yes, I've rebooted DSL modem, AEX and main SSH server multiple times. Ideas?

Well, I wouldn't put that past AT&T. But I don't know how to reckon if they are. Their technical support is all but useless except for the most mundane or simple issues. And the amount of time it would take me to work my way through the phone tree to get to someone who could actually answer that question (I've tried before) would make it more feasible to switch ISP's and start from scratch. I thought there might be some issue with the AEX router or port forwarding that I'm missing. But like I said, the only thing that's changed is that I lost the ADSL line for a couple of days.

Inbound Deliveries without reference configuration

All, currently we are creating outbound deliveries (VL01N and VL01NO) to transit materials to our offshore plants, we now have a requirement to switch on inbound deliveries in MM but be visible in RLM. the inbound deliveries we want to create will be similar to VL01NO (Without Reference), i have read a number of postings where the responce is to create a return PO! we don't want to be tied to creating return PO's but do a material transfer and have this visible on our shipment summary in RLM. has anyone got any suggestions on the required configuration for inbound deliveries for RLM?
Thanks!

Hi,
I dont know whether there is any report for this requirement.
However, you can restrict if the item should be added without reference or not in OVLK, select your delivery type and select 201 requirement in the field item requirement.
System will not allow you to enter / add any item that does not refer to sales order.
Hope you get some inputs
regards,
Sagar

PS Implementation without COPA

Hi Gurus,
Can anybody clarify following queries.....
1. Can we implement PS Module without COPA Module.
2. If so, what will be the settlement object in settlement rule. (WBS Settlement)
Note: We are implementing PS module for Customer Projects and COPA is not in our implementation scope.
Regards,
Ganesh Ck

It is ideal to have PS module along with COPA. However we can implement just the PS module. The only small issue that we would have is settlement of revenues. We need to settle revenue only to revenue GL accounts You have is create appropraite allocation structure:
1. Create allocation structure
2. Create 2 assignments "Rev" and "COST"
3. For source assign all cost related accounts to "COST" and revenue related accounts to "REV"
4. For settlement, the receiver category can be cost center/wbs element for "COST". The receiver category has to be GL accounts for "REV"

Bonded Warehouse configuration documentation

Please indicate where I may find information on how to configure Bonded Warehouse
Sincerely,
David Ward

Hi,
if you found some docs - I would be also interested in them.
regards,
Ralf

Mexico Digital Invoice Implementation without XI.

Hi All,
We are in the process of generating Digital invoice for Mexico.
Is it possible to generate the Digital invoice without the XI system? If possible then what are the hurdles and challenges in achieving this. I did go through the list of Notes mentioned by SAP to implement Digital Signatures for Mexico. But they dont seem to mention about implementing with out XI system.
Also is there any standard process to generate the XML required for Mexico. Appreciate any clarification for the above queries..
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Navin.

Hi Naveen,
Is important to consider three points at the moment of implementin Digital Invoice Mexico:
Enablement of ODN (official document numbering).
Enable digital signature in SAP.
Creation of XML.
You can perform the first two options withount PI/XI but the only problem will be the generation of XML, that for fiscal purposes is the digital invoice. If you are not using PI/XI you can do that by ABAP, Webmethods or any tool that generates XML.
If you decide to generate the XML with ABAP, you dont need to use IDOC but is still needed to create an output message that generates the XML instead a smartform or other. This can be sent automatically to customers or to any kind of repository to keep the files for fiscal term.
The structure of the XML must follows all Mexican requirements acording to Anexo 20 that you can find only in spanish.
I suggest you to read the attachments on the following note, where you can find the structure and requirements and order of each XML field:
1318342 - Digital Invoice Mexico IDoc basic type INVOIC02 Extension
Regarding the standard process to generate XML in SAP, the only information provided by SAP is for PI/XI, so your ABAP team needs to take a look for anexo 20 structure:
ftp://ftp2.sat.gob.mx/asistencia_servicio_ftp/publicaciones/cfd/Anexo20RMF2010.pdf
I hope this may help you.
Regards,
RP

Data warehouse configuration doubt

Hi guys,
I´m studing data warehouse and I would like to know if there´s any documentation showing the correct way to configure a DW database, like parameters, block size and partitioned tables.
or if you have experience please post here your suggestions.
Thank you,
Felipe

Starting with Oracle's data Warehousing Guide, documentation is a great start.
http://download-uk.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10501_01/server.920/a96520/toc.htm
You can also search fro datawarehouse books from goole or any search enginee.
Jaffar

Password recovery for 2960 without loosing configuration

Hi,
I don't remember password for Cisco 2960 switch, now i want to recover the password. I have checked few documents but would like to know few things before following these steps.
1. Is password recovery procedure for Cisco 2960 switch is different from normal ctr+break then change the register method? As i am more confident of doing this procedure than using mode button and then renaming the configuration file.
2. If i follow below procedure then hope it won't erase the configuration including vlans information.?
https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/11756896/cisco-switch-29603560-password-recovery-and-factory-default-mode-button
3. Pressing mode button is an alternate to using ctrl+break sequence? and long pressing of mode button does't effect anything.
4. Restarting the switch after pressing mode button (without making any changes) will go back to previous configuration (working condition).
Thanks.

1. Is password recovery procedure for Cisco 2960 switch is different from normal ctr+break then change the register method? As i am more confident of doing this procedure than using mode button and then renaming the configuration file.
Password recovery for switches, like the Catalyst 2K and 3K, are far more simpler. Read this: Cisco Catalyst Fixed Configuration Layer 2 and Layer 3 Switches
2. If i follow below procedure then hope it won't erase the configuration including vlans information.?
https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/11756896/cisco-switch-29603560-password-recovery-and-factory-default-mode-button
I've posted a link above. I'd recommend you read that one. The link you've posted is about someone who wants to make a simple procedure look complicated.
3. Pressing mode button is an alternate to using ctrl+break sequence? and long pressing of mode button does't effect anything.
Correct. Get your mindset out of the password recovery of routers. When you are dealing with some models of switches, it's the "Mode" button. There are no "Mode" buttons in routers, hence, the Ctrl+Break key is required.
4. Restarting the switch after pressing mode button (without making any changes) will go back to previous configuration (working condition).
If you did NOT rename the configuration file, yes, the switch will reboot and load the existing configuration file.
If you renamed the configuration file, the switch will reboot. Finding no configuration file, the switch will load the factory defaulted configuration.

RF-Implement without Warehouse Configuration.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for