Rfbila00 operating income wrong after release change

Hello,
We are getting ready for a release change from SAP 4.6c to ERP 6.0.
After a test upgrade we compared the numbers in the report rfbila00 (Balance Sheet/Profit and Loss) before and after the release change. Hereby we discovered a huge difference in the line Operating Income. All other line items are ok. Only the line Operating Income is off. So we assume that it is not a data issue, but some wrong / missing setting in SAP.
All settings of the report are identical and also the setting of how the Operating Income gets calculated.
Has anyone an idea what the reason might be?
Thanks,
Roman

have a look into directory
   \usr\sap\trans\tmp
and additionaly to the latest
   \usr\sap\trans\log\SLOG*
file.
specially the 2nd file should normaly tell you more.
regards
Peter

Similar Messages

  • New object M_LPET_LGO after release change

    Hello,
    we are in the progress of a release change from ECC 5.0 to ECC 6.0.
    Now we are testing the authorizations and roles.
    Some user got the error (/nSu53) that the object M_LPET_LGO is missing.
    When we analyze this object in SU24, we did not find any transaction assigned to object M_LPET_LGO ????
    Gruß
    Toni

    Hi ,
    guessing, found a note from  2004  there is correction note (770961) probably SAP has created the object  by themselves for ECC6.0  so that customer can add this element manually based on the need.
    lets wait for some expert from SAP to answer, I have seen two major  objects like this so far. Did SAP forget to insert them into a transaction or they found it be useful along  with various  other MM transactions?

  • Problem with File System Repository after release change

    Hello,
    we have been changing the Portal release from EP 6.0 to SAP NetWeaver Portal 7.0 SP17. The OS of the host is Windows 2003 Server.
    If I open the component monitor to watch the repostitories, the state of the file system repositories are red and a error message occurred:
    Startup Error:  getting mapped math - Logon failure: unknown user name or bad password
    I checked the logon credentials....they are ok. Also I checked the access from the Portalhost to the Windows File System....it´s ok too.
    In our previous portal release the FSR were ok!!
    Is there a difference between the file system repository configuration in portal 6.0 and portal 7.0?
    Thanks and regards
    Tom

    Hello Hussain,
    I have checked the username and the password of the user who have full access on the Windows file system, but the same error occurred. In the Network Path we have configured a domain user for the file system access. Here is the configuration of the network path:
    Name: Test
    Description: Test
    Networkpath:
    Host\share
    Password: ****
    Re-enter Password: ****
    User: domain\user
    Here the configuration of the repository:
    Name: Test
    Description: Test
    Prefix: /Test
    Lookup Mode: caseless
    Root Directory:
    Host\share
    Repository Services: Nothing
    Property Search Manager: com.sapportals.wcm.repository.manager.generic.search.SimpleManagerSearchManager
    Security Manager: AclSecurityManager
    ACL Manager Cache: ca_cm_rep_acl
    Windows Landscape System: Microsoft_Windows_KM
    Read only: unchecked
    Could it be that I need a user mapping for the access of the windows file system?
    Perhaps the configuration of the Windows Landscape System is wrong?
    regards
    Tom

  • Need to Change PR after Release

    Hi,
    We have a PR which is created and Released. It is configured in such a way that after release, changes are not allowed. Now, the user wants to change the Purchase Group field (only that field) in the PR without re-triggering the release strategy. I checked the Release Indicator in the Release Strategy and changed the field 'Changeable' to the value 2.
    Now, it allows to change the Purchase Group. But, user also be able to add new line items to PR, which we don't want to allow.That means, user should only be able to change the Purchase Group field of the existing line items. No other changes should be allowed.
    How we can solve this issue.. Please give me your suggestions.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi Arminda,
    Thanks for your reply.
    I tried that. As you said, it will make all fields as 'Display' and only 'Purchasing Group' as editable.
    But, the problem is, it will allow the user to add a new line item to the PR without affecting the Release Status.
    I don't want to allow the user to add another line item.
    Is there any control in the field 'Changeable' where we give the values 1 to 4 ? Please let me know.

  • PO Ammendment after release prints only changed materials,need to print all

    Dear Sir/Madam,
    i'm creating a PO and releasing it using ME9F
    Now, when i change the PO, only the changed materials are displyed in the Output.
    Now, i got to know that this is the standard process. but my requirement is that all the materials are to be displayed in the output after the change. PLease give your suggestions.

    This is the standard process. Check the calls to the function module ME_READ_PO_FOR_PRINTING in your print program. The combination of NAST-AENDE & DRUVO (print operation flag) influence the PO items for printing.
    When a the purchase order was printed during create PO, NAST-AENDE is blank and paramter DRUVO is set to 1 (New PO) in the print program and this will collect all the PO line items.
    When a PO was changed,   NAST-AENDE is X, the print program sets DRUVO to 2 and this will collect the PO line items that were changed.
    In order to print all the PO line items after the change to the PO, make a change to the print program to set DRUVO to 1 when NAST-AENDE is X.
    This will fix your issue.
    Manoj

  • Deletion of order operations after releasing them

    Why is it still possible to delete order operations within an order after releasing (system status = REL) them.
    How can I avoid that those operations / activities can not be changed?
    Thanks in advance.
    Best regards,
    Dennis

    Dennis,
    On a prevois project we had to use a user-exit at save to prevent deletion of operations unless you were authorised. We used IWO10009 (at save) for this purpose.
    I don't think is can be done via user-statuses??? I'm sure we must have checked at the time...
    PeteA
    [www.pjas.com]

  • Change the  description of the change request number" in SE10 after release

    Hi All
    Is there way to change the
    "description of the change request number" in SE10
    after releasing the change request number?
    appreciate your feedback
    Thanks you
    Iver

    Hello
    I do not know a way to do it in se10 but a simple program could do the trick.
    Include the following code in your program.
    update e07t set as4text = 'your new description'
          where trkorr = your_cr and langu = 'E'.
    Of course you will have to wrestle with the 'moral issue' of directly updating SAP delivered tables
    Regards
    Greg Kern.

  • Changing effect of PO after Release of PO

    Hi,
    In our present scenario.First we create the PO and if we go for ME9F or For GR without Releaisng of PO it is giving error message PO is not yet release which is OK, but if we release the PO, and after that if we change the PO it is not asking again for PO release my requirement is that after changing in PO system should not allow to ME9F or MIGO it should again ask for PO release, and also how to see the changes made for a particular PO.
    regards,
    zafar

    hi,
    by means of release indicator we can reinitiate the release after any changes, so, system will not allow to excute the transaction ME9F and MIGO
    if you want to see the chages, we can see thru two ways
    1. in PO screen after saving the changes you can see in the environment mennu- header changes or item changes
    2. by activating version management we can see the changes in the PO screen itself as a seperate tab called version
    hope this information will help you
    Regards
    Sridharan

  • Changes in PR even after release

    Dear Gurus
    In purchase Requisition change (ME52N) it is allowing to change PR Quantity and Price even after released from the higher authorities.
    What Configuration has to be done so that After release of PO system should not allow to do any changes in Purchase requisition.
    Where as the purchase requisiotn changes has to be done only after the higher authority asks to make changes i.e the higher authorities has sent for revision.
    Also plz let me know how can the higher authority set the purchase req for Changes in SAP (Any configuration has to be done for that).
    Or any customizing settings required.
    If the Changes is done in PR then again release strategy should be applicable.
    Please guide me.
    Regards
    shailesh

    Hi SHailesh,
    In your release procedure for PR's. For the release indicator, in the field changebill enter
    Options:
    1 - Cannot be changed (no changes possible)
    4 - Changeable, but new release in case of value change or strategy change
    The above will resolve your issue.
    if helpful award points
    Regards,
    Vivek

  • Internal change after Release

    Hi
    Scenario
    We are using internal order (Investment) for capital budgeting.
    We have created two roles a)Z_FI_IOCREATION for order creation, change
    and display and b)Z_FI_IORELEASE exclusively for releasing the order.
    End users create the order and their HOD's release the oders.
    Requirement
    End users can change the order n number of times but only before
    Release of the order.
    After release of Order if the order is changed by end user the orders
    should be available for Release again. This way we contol the change of
    orders after approval. How this can be addressed.
    Regards
    Ganesh

    Hi,
    Try whether you do not give authroization for change of Internal Order through transaction code KO02.
    Trust this helps much!
    Cheers!

  • Recurring meetings shifted wrongly after change of one occurrence

    Hello everybody,
    I observe an issue with instances of recurring meetings being wrongly shifted in time after changing date of one of the instances in the respective series (repeatedly and for different meetings/meeting series). It looks as if my current "distance" to UTC (including DST adjustment) is "re-applied" to the meeting instance (i.e. the meeting is shifted 2 hours forward compared to the original time; my timezone is GMT+1 and together with the current DST shift it equals to those 2 hours).
    I use Q10 (SQN100-3, SW 10.1.0.1666) together with the BB Enterprise Server (BES) connected to MS Exchange plus MS Outlook 2007 on the desktop.
    I haven't managed to discover all the dependencies and reproduce it reliably but the pattern is as follows:
    - I have a recurring meeting (typically for half a year).
    - I open one of the meeting instances in MS Outlook and change its date (e.g. move it by one week but without changing the starting and end time). An updated meeting invitation is sent to other meeting participants (I can see that it is correct in my "Sent" folder in MS Outlook and it also appears correctly in the MS Outlook calendar).
    - Other meeting participants respond to my update request (I suspect that the problem is related to processing of these responses, but I cannot prove this suspicion).
    - Later on I check my calendar (either on Q10 or MS Outlook) and realize that the meeting is wrongly shifted by 2 hours (or I don't realize it early enough and others start planning other meetings during the original timeslot since it appears free in my schedule on MS Exchange :-((( ). When checking the Sent folder in MS Outlook, there is no message about any further update of the meeting (which means that I couldn't have shifted the meeting by mistake myself, because MS Outlook 2007 simply doesn't allow you to save a meeting with changed times without sending an update request to other attendees); obviously, all the other participants still have the meeting scheduled with the right (original) time in their calendars.
    I should add that this clearly started happening after I changed my BlackBerry device to the new BB10 version - nothing similar ever happened to me with the older BB devices (and corresponding BES version).
    Anyone observing something similar? Is posting this information here sufficient for having someone from the developers having a look at this issue, or is there some other way how to pass it to the right people?
    Thanks
    Tomas

    Hi again,
    I have further analyzed the issue in order to find out dependencies on why it is shifted sometimes and sometimes not:
    First of all, I can confirm that the shift is immediately triggered by opening certain invitation responses on my BlackBerry Q10 (while opening some other invitation responses does not trigger the issue). In other words - if I check the event on BlackBerry calendar just before opening the particular response from BlackBerry Hub and right after opening it, I can observe that it moved in the meantime.
    Apart from the (so far confirmed) fact that it apparently happens only for irregular appointment instances from appointment series (as already indicated in my original submission), I have noticed that even different responses do or do not trigger the issue. In particular, I have noticed that responses from certain e-mail/calendar clients include information about the event with _wrong_ timezone information (as an example, a response from certain Windows Phone client ("PRODID=Microsoft Windows Phone") refers to "TZID=W. Europe Standard Time") and this response does _not_ trigger the issue, whereas a response coming from MS Outlook ("PRODID=Microsoft Exchange Server 2007") and correct timezone information (TZID="(GMT+01:00) Belgrade, Bratislava, Budapest, Ljubljana, Prague") _does_ trigger the issue. Obviously, the main issue is that invitation response should naturally _never_ trigger any update of the original event...
    Hoping that this helps anyone to address the issue soon...
    Tomas

  • Changing Purchase Reqs after release.

    After releasing a Preq (Cost Centre), if we attempt to change it in ME52N everything on the line's display only. So I can't increase the qty for example and send for re-approval (trigger the release strategy). This is normal?
    The Changeability indicator in OMGQ for the release indicator (F - released) was blank. I changed this to 4 but neither allow us to change the Preq after realease. Could you maybe advise please? Is it possible to change the req after release, seems odd I can't?

    Hello,
      in customizing for release indicator, you must check also field "Field selection key" which is defined under "Material management --> Purchasing --> Purchase requisition --> Define screen layout at document level". You should check the "Field selection key" assigned to your release indicator: that key defines the mandatory, optional and view-only fields in Purchase documents, and can be linked to a release status.
    Hope to be useful.
    Best regards,
    Andrea

  • PR quantity change after Release

    Hi Friends,    
                                       I am unable to change PR Quantity after release of PR. Please suggest..
    Regards,

    hi,
    When you set up the release strategy there is an indicator for the changability, which states that whether you wanna make the further changes in the PR doc, once it is released...
    So, if you wanna allow the changability for the PR docs, then you can use the any of the indicator among 4, 5 , 6 as per your req....
    by this you shd be able to make changes...
    Regards
    Priyanka.P

  • Po header change after release

    Dear All
    We require list of PO for last one month PO header or tiem level text has been changed after release
    Regards
    Dishant

    Hi,
    You can use the following report to get you all the changes in PO. Ask your ABAP person to run it for you.
    http://www.sap-img.com/mm001.htm
    It is an ABAP program contributed by one of the SAP members, which reports all the changes made in PO and list out the details per document.
    Hope it helps,
    Best regards
    Amit Bakshi

  • Purchase order changes after release

    Hi,
    How can I block a purchase order to any changes after release it and then, in case of need, mark for deletion the purchase order itens?
    Regards,
    Maria

    Hi,
    To block any changes in the purchase order to after release, set Changeability  indicator as 1 for  Release ID "R" in following path & save.:
    SPRO ->MM - Purchasing -> PO -> Rlease Procedure for PO -> Define Release for PO -> Release Indicator
    NOTE:If you set  Changeability  indicator as 3, PO can be changed after release and trigger a  new release strategy based on value changes.
    Regards,
    Biju K

Maybe you are looking for

  • Sending synchronization results by mail

    Hello, i've been asked a question and am not sure about the answer. Is it possible to send synchronization results by mail ? So for me it gets to : - is it possible to get the result you see in the webtogo manager in a log file with just the result a

  • MDDataSetBW.GetCellData. See RFC trace file or SAP system log for more...

    Ingo, I am getting below error message in BO Test environment when I refresh WebI document. MDDataSetBW.GetCellData. See RFC trace file or SAP system log for more details It was working when we migrated the objects initially. Subsequently when we try

  • Click on an Image?

    How can I add a click to an image, so that when its clicked, it will do this: myTexta[event.target.repeaterIndices-mapRepeater.startingIndex].visible = true;

  • Can't shut down properly.

    I don't seem to be able to shut down my computer properly, whether using the shortcut keys controloption+commandeject or from the apple menu on the top left. Can someone help explain or solve my problem? Interval Since Last Panic Report: 282815 sec P

  • Ref_descr ?= cl_abap_typedescr= describe_by_name explanation

    Hello Everyone, Can somebody explain what is happening in this part of the code. Below the complete code. ref_descr ?= cl_abap_typedescr=>describe_by_name( p_table ).   it_details[] = ref_descr->components[]. One more request, what are these structur