Rfc interface generator

Hallo Gurus,
as far as you know is the "RFC Interface Generator" still active?
It should be under:
Tools --> ABAP Workbench ---> Development --> Function library
and then utilities -> RFC generate
I am working on a SAP ECC 6.0.
I need it to generate the code to call an RFC from an external program...
Thank you very much indeed!

se37 > <fm_name>
goto > furture options> generate RFC include
generate RFC/ update include

Similar Messages

Generating RFC Interface skeleton code

hi
In SAP R346C the menu for generating Rfc skelecton code was present in the utilities menu.
I am not able to locate it in sapr347. Can somebody point it to me.

Hi,
this is OSS-Nr. 551830:
Symptom
There is no code generator for RFC interfaces in transaction SE37, menu option Utilities -> RFC interface -> Generate.
Other terms
RFC stub, C programming
Reason and Prerequisites
Since functions were changed in the Web Application Server, the generation function is no longer provided.
Solution
Instead of directly using the RFC library, you can use the Java Connector (JCo) or the .NET Connector.
As of Version 6.20, you can also use our SOAP implementation for calls to SAP.
You can download both connectors from SAPnet. Here you will also find information on the release as well as use of SOAP implementation. This information is available on http://service.sap.com/connectors.
sorry ...
Viktor

RFC Interface Generation

Under 4.6C, in SE37 you could generate RFC interface code (.c and .h files) for a function by going to the menu bar: Utilities / RFC Interface / Generate
Under 4.7, there is no RFC Interface option under Utilities. Any idea if this has been moved elsewhere, or if it is gone altogether?

Hi Lisa,
Look at oss note 551830. It tells you the replacement.

NWDS import RFC interface for the structure issue??

Hi Gurus,
I'm working on the SAP NetWeaver BPM with NWDS 7.3 SP12 rite now and got confused about the RFC interface structure stuff.
I have a mapping activity defined in the process and the receiver interface needs a RFC. So I go to "Process Modeling" -> "Services Interfaces", right click and choose "Import RFC",type the correct RFC/BAPI name connecting with the SAP ECC system. The issue is that when I finished importing the RFC, went to the "Data Types", the RFC interface namespace shows out but the structure shows seperately with individual segment, so the whole nested RFC interface structure messed up in parallel which is incorrect for the data object and output mapping for later process activities.
Anyone has ran into such kind of issue or experience the same, any solution or suggestion?
Thanks in advance,
Rajesh

William,
Another two questions relates to NWDS BPM development:
1. Sometimes after I import the service interface into NWDS, the structure displays differently from it defines in ESR, I mean the fields sequence. I dont know why
2. Refer to your screenshot,
Assume the occurence of node HEADER and item is (0..1), when I want to map a blank constant to them to generate the target structure, the editor not allows and display error which is very different with ESR mapping tool, could you please help to advise? Tons of thanks!
Thanks a lot in advance,
Rajesh

EDI to RFC interface

Hi,
I'm about to implement Spec2000 to RFC interface. since XI does not support EDI (no EDI adaptors available) i'll have choose one out of two options:
1. manipulate EDI as it was regular text file.
2. use 3rd party tool as an adaptor.
i belies my first option is complicated and clearly has great risk, so i'm looking for as much leads as i can get.
Tnx in advance
Uri

>
uri karagila wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm about to implement Spec2000 to RFC interface. since XI does not support EDI (no EDI adaptors available) i'll have choose one out of two options:
>
> 1. manipulate EDI as it was regular text file.
> 2. use 3rd party tool as an adaptor.
>
> i belies my first option is complicated and clearly has great risk, so i'm looking for as much leads as i can get.
>
> Tnx in advance
>
> Uri
Option 1 - I guess that is not a good idea considering the complexity in EDI messages. But then it denpends how many interfaces you have. If there are very less say under 10 interfaces using the EDI spec. then it is still worth investing time and money on coming up with the manipulation but else.... its a night mare.
Option 2 - There are various third party adapter available ex. seeburger, iway etc which you can make use. Only thing is it comes with a cost but life becomes much easier.

"problem installing LabVIEW Interface Generator"

Hello,
I am running labview 7.1, windows xp sp2.
I am interested in trying out the new labview interface generator, but something seems to be going wrong on installation.
I download and run the executable, it unpackages a bunch of stuff pretty fast, then it starts unpackaging an "MDSPlus" package that takes a very long time (20 minutes). Then the MDSplus install wizard comes up, I press ok/next. Then another very long wait while it installs, then finally a message saying MDSplus installation complete, click close to exit which I do. Then that wizard goes away, as does the extracting zip dialog. No errors, everything seems fine.
But then when I open labview, there is no change: same old tools under tools/instrumentation. There is no "interface generator" on the list produced by add/remove programs (top level or under National Instruments). The only thing added is MDSplus.
Have attempted several times, rebooted, etc. Still no new tools.
Thanks in advance
TR Livesey
Dynamic Signals LLC

Hi TR:
Thanks for your patience.   I think we (at NI) started barking up the wrong tree. I went back to your original post and notice you said things like MDSplus, 20 minute install time, etc.   I'm wondering if this is something as simple as you are running the wrong installer. The self-extracting archive file for the LabVIEW Interface Generator tool is named "driverctolv.exe".   Is this what you downloaded and are running? If not, please go back to the web site:
https://sine.ni.com/apps/utf8/nigb.guestbook?code=GB_INFOLVINSTDRIVER&lang=US&gb_prof_id=4982&scode=...
Fill in the info again, select "Continue" to get to the next page. If you are running Internet Explorer, right-click on the "Download the utility for LabVIEW 7.1" link and select "Save Target As...". You should see the filename at this point. Verify that it indeed has the name listed above.   After download then run the extracting archive. The installer should take no more than a minute or two to install (no where near 20 minutes) and the dialogs should not indicate MDSplus.
I did a few Google and other searches on MDSplus. It seems that there are VI wrappers around MDSPlus libraries. So, maybe you are also using this product separately?
If, for some reason, you are indeed launching the driverctolv.exe and somehow the MDSplus installer is being launched, we really need to take a totally different approach to problem solving. But, maybe you can confirm before we go down that path.
Again, thanks for your patience.
Noel Adorno

Performance Tuning in HTTP - RFC Interface

Hi,
I'm currently working on a HTTP --> RFC scenario and facing slow performance issues. When I test this interface with a transaction having 1 line item, the response from RFC is instantaneous. However, when there are about 400 line items, the average response time from RFC is about 8-9 seconds. When this interface goes live, there will be transactions with > 1000 line items. I'm really worried about the performance going down, as performance is a major criteria for deploying this interface.
Could you suggest any steps to improve the performance/reduce the response time?
Thanks,
Guru

Guru,
Disable all the Fields in the RFC which you are not using / populating.
One of my colleagues faced a similar problem and when they disabled the fields which were not being used when triggering the RFC call, the perfromance improved drastically.
Also, turn off logging of Synch Messages as this also can cause perfromance issues.
SXMB_ADM --> Integration Engine Configuration --> LOGGING_SYNC should be set to 0
Regards
Bhavesh

Proxy to FILE/RFC Interface

Hi Experts,
Recently your ECC is upgrade, My Scenario is PROXY - > PI -> FILE/RFC, There are 2 issues for the same interface.
Getting CCMS Alerts as below. When I check in SMQ2, i dont see any messages are stucked in the queue, but we are receiving this alerts frequently from after upgrade.
Issue 1:-
ALERT for MIP \ Transactional RFC and Queued RFC \ Int. Server Outbound Messages (XBQO*) \ Blocked queues: Client 001 at 20140801 101549 ( Time in UTC ) RED CCMS alert for monitored object Blocked queues: Client 001 Alert Text:Blocked inbound queue: Client 001 Q name XBQO0___XI_SERIALIZE0068 status RETRY dest CHGVA-SAP-MIP_MIP_14 System:MIP
Segment:SAP_CCMS_CHGVA-SAP-MIP_MIP_14
MTE:MIP\Transactional RFC and Queued RFC\Int. Server Outbound Messages (XBQO*)\Blocked queues: Client 001
Client:000
User:SAPSYS
Severity: 50
Issue 2:-
The messages is getting successful in message monitoring when going into details Audit log is showing the below error. Once is successfully delivered the message the message Id is trying to deliver the same message ID and getting the below error.
This is also comming after upgrade.
Putting message into receive queue failed, due to: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.DuplicateMessageException: Message ID e4196a30-56ac-59f1-a2e0-0050569a0002(INBOUND) already exists in database: com.sap.sql.DuplicateKeyException: Violation of PRIMARY KEY constraint 'PK__XI_AF_MS__99C1915D08BFA0D4'. Cannot insert duplicate key in object 'SAPMIPDB.XI_AF_MSG'..
Can any one help me out from this both issues.
Thanks in Advance for your responces
G V Anil

Hi Sarojkanta,
Its a Production issue, The messages comming form ECC as a scheduled background job.
We upgraded our ECC system to 6.0 EHP6 from EHP5 and now all asynchronous. Sender PROXY Interfaces hits PI and go immediately into RETRY status and the messages are getting successful to teh receiver. but its trying second time with the same Message ID and then we are facing this issue as show in the above screen shot.
When checked in MONI for this interface all the messages are showing as below.
Call Adapter is getting failed and trying second time.
Thanks
G V Anil

HTTP to RFC Interface Determination problem

Hi experts,
I am doing HTTP <-> RFC scenario mentioned in blog
/people/community.user/blog/2006/12/12/http-to-rfc--a-starter-kit
almost everthing is done; but while configuring the interface determination, i am not able to see the inbound interface.
your valuable help would be appreciated
Regards
Sumit Bhutani

Hi Bhavesh,
Thanks for your quick response; this problem has been resolved, but while testing my scenario using RWB i am getting this error.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
<SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="MAPPING">CANNOT_READ_PAYLOAD</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1 />
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>Unable to read payload from the message object</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>N</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
Please suggest on this
Thanks
Sumit

RFC interface failed without mapping

HELLO ALL,
I was working on SOAP to RFC scenario having a simple message mapping in it. The interface was working perfectly fine.
Later on I got a requirement to remove the mapping from my interface.
I was able to run the interface after the changes but It doesnt return any value, which usually happens when we pass wrong parameters to the RFC for which RFC doesnt find any entry.
I tested the RFC with the same test data using se37 and it returned me the records.
Any clue, why the RFC doesnt understand the input values when we dont have a mapping ? Does the message mapping convert/format the input data ?
I will appreciate for your inputs.
Thanks to all.
PEERU

Thanks both, for your replies.
As per my understanding mapping is optional in XI.
I am using the RFC request and response structure for the SOAP end. I just created a message interface for the SOAP sender, based on the RFC request and response structures.
Correct me if in the case of RFC, SAP makes mapping a mandatory object. I dint find any document which says that mapping is always needed for RFC receiver interface.
Thank You.
PEERU

Receiver RFC - Interface Objects

Hi every one,
I have a scenario, SOAP (SYNC)- XI - RFC (SYNC), MY question is do we need to create and interface objects for the receiver. Or can I use the RFC as the interface object.
Technical explanation would really help me.
Please clear.
Thanks,
-Naveen.

Hi Naveen,
<i>>>>>>do we need to create and interface objects for the receiver. Or can I use the RFC as the interface object.</i>
As RFC itself is a interface you need not create a seperate interface for an RFC.
In message mapping you will need to create two message mapping.
One SOAP_Req to RFC_Req
two RFC_Res to SOAP_Res.
When you will try to implement Interface Mapping, the source interface would be the imported 'External defination' of WSDL and the receiver would be the RFC. In the lower section of the same screen click 'Response' tab and add RFC_Res to SOAP_Res as mapping prog and under 'Request' tab add SOAP_Req to RFC_Req.
Let me know if you further assistance.
regards,
Ashish

Different EBS Adapter interfaces generate same object types differently

Hi,
We are experiencing the following behavior when using two different interfaces that are both generated from the E-Business Suite Adapter.
Wrapper packages and object types are generated and created in the database. But in both cases the generator creates a type called gme_api_pub_rowtype_sql1.
Alas, that same type has a different specification depending on the interface. Hence, one of the api's has compile errors as it expects the type to have additional parameters.
Has anyone experienced the same behavior?
More important: is there a way to overcome the problem?
Thanks, Sjoerd

To add to that:
We are not willing to have separate schemas for each of the EBS Adapter interfaces so that we can have multiple instances / occurrences of type gme_api_pub_rowtype_sql1, i.e. one per schema.
This would quickly turn into a maintenance nightmare.
Thanks, Sjoerd

DS 3.2 ADD NEW RFC INTERFACE ERROR

Hi,
When I Add a new RFC connection Interface the follow message is returned : Error adding new RFC Server Interface: An error occurred while adding a client: DI_SOURCE@/H/10.0.0.10/S/3302:null (BODI-3017270)
There is some KIT Integration SAP for DataServices? Because if I install the Crystal Reports in the Server with BO Data Services, the RFC connection Interface works.
So, I think that need of some KIT of Integration SAP or some files necessary for that.
tks for any help,
Rodrigo Silveira

RFC Client Configuration dependents on following
<tomcat>\webapps\DataServices\WEB-INF\lib\sapjco3.jar - this jar file is shipped along with DataServices war file and is available to mangement console
%LINK_DIR%\bin\jco3\lib32\sapjco3.dll - the above jar file needs this DLL, this is also shipped with DS installation
there is no requirement for installing any other SAP component for this, the problem that you encountered could happen for following reasons
there are 2 copies of sapjco3.dll of different version, and dll which is not compatible with the jco3.jar is getting loaded resulting in error
some of the dependent dll required by sapjco3.dll is missing from the system, and after installing Crystal Report got installed
if you are having similar issue on other system you can check for following
search for sapjco3.dll, how many copies are there ?
use depends utility to find the dependent dll for sapjco3.dll located in %LINK_DIR%\bin\lib32, do you see anything listed as missing ?

Outbound interface - Generating files with ANSI encoding.

Hi All,
I am able to generate output files with txt extension. But it is generating in UTF-8 encoding files, myself when i open the files in notepad, i find UTF-8 and when opened in wordpad i find ANSI. My user wants it in ANSI in any case.
One more thing my client's language is Spanish, where there will be special characters like Ñ, so if the file is in ANSI, will there be a problem for this characters.
Please help.

So which OS is to blame? The Mac seems to be inserting weird paragraph returns that Windows doesn't understand, no matter what type of file encoding you use (UTF-8, Western Windows Latin 1, Western DOS Latin 1).
My understanding is that TextEdit uses standard Unix type line endings, called LF (line feed, hex 0A). Windows stuff uses a different convention, CR + LF (0D 0A). If a Windows app will not display text just because it encounters something other than CR + LF, I'd say it probably has a bug of some sort.
Is there a solution to this probem?
I don't think the line endings of TextEdit can be changed. Some other apps like Text Wrangler offer you a choice in their preferences.

RFC Interface Programming

Hi All,
Using the RFC SDK APIs, we are trying to implement RFC client programs(in C lang). For example to invoke BAPI_XMI_LOGON, we have used RfcCallReceive() function.
All the importing and exporting parameters are set. However even after the API succeeds(RFC_OK is returned), the exporting parameters are not getting updated with the output values.
Could anyone please let me know what could be the problem or any other steps are required to be done ?
Thanks in Advance,
Devi

Hi
Typical examples of RFC client programs are sapinfo.c, startrfc.c and srfctest.c which are included in the RFC SDK.
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/EN/data/pdf/BCFESDE4/BCFESDE4.pdf
Regards

Rfc interface generator

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for