RFC SDK support on solaris-intel?

I have some questions about the C SAP RFC SDK. I cannot seem to find a complete list of supported UNIX platforms.
What is the current version of the C RFC SDK?
Is it supported on the solaris intel platform?
I notice that the dynamic version of the RFC library (rfc32.dll) is installed with SAP Netweaver on Windows. Is the equivalent dynamically loaded library (i.e. librfc.so) always included with a SAP installation on UNIX as well? Does this mean that the static libraries provided in the RFC SDK are no longer required to build a client RFC application, since a client application can dynamically load the run-time library instead?

We don't certify Solaris on NT.
          You can find this information on platform support page.
          -- Prasad
          Puneet Maini wrote:
          > Hi
          > Is Clustering comfiguration supported for this System Requirement?
          > :
          >
          > Processor: Intel
          > Operating system: Solaris 8
          >
          > Thanks & Regards
          > Puneet Maini

Similar Messages

Portal Server support on Solaris/Intel Architecture

Hi Gurus,
Is iPlanet portal supported on Solaris on Intel architecture? Any of you have this kind of setup and experienced any problem? or was it smooth sailing? or is there some particular version of Solaris OS that has to be used..etc.
Thanks
Ashok

The short answer is No. The current version of Portal Servers both 3.0 and 6.0 are supported only in Solaris / Sparc arch.

OpenMP on Solaris/Intel

Hi,
Will OpenMP be supported on Solaris/Intel?
Erling

c> Has there been a time set on when this configuration will be tested
c> and supported?
I'm afraid this is unlikely to happen at all. As far as I know,
Solaris on Intel doesn't represent a large enough target market to be
worth porting to. What little market share it ever gained is being
rapidly eaten by Linux.
<b
Let us pray:
What a Great System.
Please Do Not Crash.
^G^IP@P6

Oracle 9 for Solaris (Intel) x86?

Did oracle drop support for Solaris (Intel) x86? I run a shop with a large scale intel server running Solaris 9 (x86) and would like to try out Oracle 9i on it.
Please advise: [email protected]
Thanks!

You can find information about Oracle product certifications here,
http://otn.oracle.com/support/metalink/content.html
You can also find information about desupported platforms in the same place. This link is available from "Get Support" navigation element on OTN home page.

Who knows - Has Oracle plan to make 9i on Solaris Intel x86 in the future?

Now Sun continue support of Solaris Intel, But Oracle release only 8.1.7 exist.
Any comments,please

Hi again,
assumption proven ;-)
full details from Oracle below
HTH,
Peter
Applies to: Oracle Server - Enterprise Edition - Version: 10.2.0.1
SymptomsWhile installing Oracle10gR2 on a Solaris 10 x86-64 server, Oracle Universal Installer (OUI) reports the following errors while checking the kernel parameters:
shmsys:shminfo_shmmax=4294967295 found no entry . Failed <<
shmsys:shminfo_shmmni=100 found no entry . Failed <<
shmsys:shminfo_semmni=100 found no entry . Failed <<
shmsys:shminfo_semmsl=256 found no entry . Failed <<
The overall results of this check is Failed.
The kernel parameters do not meet the minimum requirements
CauseOUI is looking at /etc/system to check the kernel parameter settings, but this file is not used (by default) in Solaris 10
OUI should check the kernel parameter settings using the resource control utility ( /bin/prctl )
SolutionTo implement the solution, please execute one the following steps:
1. Verify that the kernel parameter settings are correct using the resource control utility ( /bin/prctl ) and then start OUI like this:
./runInstaller -ignoreSysPrereqs
OR
2. Include the recommended kernel parameter settings in the /etc/system file and start OUI as normal:
./runInstaller

NSAPI support on Solaris/x86

Are there plans to provide NSAPI support on Solaris/Intel platform.
Best regards
/Johan
Johan Holling
[email protected]

Not yet. But when the Linux port comes out for version 6.0 in just a few
weeks, we will.
Michael Girdley
BEA Systems
Learning WebLogic? http://learnweblogic.com
"Johan Holling" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]..
Thanks,
Do you support NSAPI or Apache plugin on Linux for WLS 6.0 (could not
find it in the "BEA WebLogic Server Platform Support" document)?
Best regards
/Johan
Michael Girdley wrote:
No, no plans at the current time. We do support Linux.
The platform support page for WebLogic Server is located at:
http://www.weblogic.com/platforms/index.html
This page has the latest and greatest information on the platforms that
WebLogic is certified and supported on.
Thanks,
Michael
Michael Girdley
BEA Systems
Learning WebLogic? http://learnweblogic.com
"Johan Holling" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]..
Are there plans to provide NSAPI support on Solaris/Intel platform.
Best regards
/Johan
Johan Holling
[email protected]

RFC SDK for Solaris 8 on SPARC 32 bit

I see that there is no support for Solaris 8 on SPARC 32 Bit. Is this true or has support been discontinued.
Any suggestions or pointers are appreciated.
Thanks
Aju

Hi Aju,
With SAP NetWeaver 7.1, the SAP NetWeaver RFC Library only supports 64bit for SUN. You can find more information you can see the SAP note 1025361 and at http://service.sap.com/connectors --> SAP NetWeaver RFC Library.
Cheers,
Mike.

SAP RFC SDK 7.1 Unicode - Supported OS

Hi,
Where can I find info about the list of Supported OS for sap rfc sdk.
Specifically, I am looking for info about RfcSdk support for Windows 7 and WIndows 2008 R2.
Any help would be highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Jeevitha

Hi Jeevitha,
please have a look at the rfc library guide:
http://service.sap.com/~form/sapnet?_SHORTKEY=01200252310000047816&_OBJECT=011000358700001892452002E
There you can find on page 2:
RFCSDK is available on all SAP supported platforms.
I am not sure if the mentioned OS are already supported - in order to get that info please have a look at
http://service.sap.com/pam
Best regards,
Nils Buerckel
SAP AG

Does IBM eServer support Solaris (Intel Platform Edition) ???

Hi Friends,
Does anyone know whether IBM eServer supports Solaris (Intel Platform Edition) or not ?
Anyone has succeeded to install it before ???
Many Thanks.
Best Regards,
Denny Ho

I'm sure that Oracle8i server supports Solaris Intel Platform and Oracle9i doesn't support Solaris Intel Platform at this moment as I know.

Is it Possible to install oracle 9i 32 bit on Sun Solaris Intel Edition

Dear OTN Members ,
It is possible to install ORACLE 9I Sun SPARC Solaris (32 Bit) on
Sun Solaris Intel Editon 2.8 . Please inform me on
email :-
[email protected]
[email protected]
Thanking You
Piyush Patel
- Server name :- pi.com
- Filename
- Date/Time
- Browser + Version : Netscape 4.7
- O/S + Version : Sun Solaris Intel Edition 2.8

857211 wrote:
I just need some advice on installing oracle 11gWhat part/product of "oracle 11g" exactly?
Installation Guides should be clear enough, if read. Also read Release Notes for additional support/unsupport info.
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/install.112/e24186/reqs.htm#CHDHGGFE
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/install.112/e24187/pre_install.htm
However the Installation Guide for Database Client adds:
"Note: Oracle provides 32-bit (Windows x86) and 64-bit (Windows x64) versions of Oracle Database Client. _Oracle certifies 32-bit Oracle Database Client on Windows x64_." (underline added)

Flash Builder 4 with Flex SDK 4.0 for Intel App Up

There is some misinformation on Intel AppUp and the Melrose FAQ about being able to publish with Flash Builder 4.
Intel App Up Program Submission
According to http://appdeveloper.intel.com/en-us/article/adobe-air-packaging-guide-atom-developer-progr am-submissions
"AIR app must be built using Flex Builder 3 with Flex SDK 3.5a. Currently Flex Builder 4 with Flex SDK 4 is not supported."
Melrose FAQ
According to http://learn.adobe.com/wiki/display/melrose/Melrose+Developer+FAQ
"Q: Are there system requirements for enabling try and buy in AIR apps using Melrose?
A: You must have Adobe Flex Builder 3 or greater and Adobe AIR 1.5.3 or greater."
Is the Intel App Up statement correct? If it is, could I get an explanation why? I've been waiting for the last 3 months waiting for the Melrose SDK to deploy to Intel App Up and now I can't even submit my application.
Thanks.

The current version of Melrose supports Flex 3.5 SDK for AIR applications running on AIR 1.5.3 runtime or higher. You can use Adobe Flex Builder 3 with Flex 3.5 SDK or Adobe Flash Builder 4 with Flex 3.5 SDK.
Support for Flex 4.1 SDK for AIR applications running on AIR 2.0 runtime should be available within a few weeks. Please note that we will not be able to support Flex 4.0 SDK because of certain technical challenges.

64-bit compilation problem on Solaris/Intel: 7th argument not initialized

I have a problem when compiling a program on a 64-bit Solaris Intel server. The problem is that when calling a function, if the 7th or next arguments are long arguments and I pass uncasted small integers values to it, the first 32-bit of my values are uninitialized.
I have isolated the problem in the following source code.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <strings.h>
void fnc1(a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h)
long a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h;
printf("%ld,%ld,%ld,%ld,%ld,%ld,%ld,%ld\n", a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h);
void main()
fnc1(0x10101010deadbeef,0x20202020deadbeef,
     0x30303030deadbeef,0x40404040deadbeef,
     0x50505050deadbeef,0x60606060deadbeef,
     0x70707070deadbeef,0x80808080deadbeef);
fnc1(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8);
}I compile it using the following command:
cc src1.c -g $* -m64 -o prog1.exeWhen I run the resulting .exe, I get the following result:
1157442768875667183,2314885534015405807,3472328299155144431,4629771064294883055,5787213829434621679,6944656594574360303,8102099359714098927,-9187201948855714065
1,2,3,4,5,6,8102099355978170375,-9187201952591642616The problem is that the first 32 bits of my 7th and 8th arguments are not initialized when the function is called.
I know that in the following cases, I do not have the problem:
- if I cast the arguments;
- on other platforms (AIX, SunOs/Sparc, HPUX) or if I compile in 32-bit;
- if I use optimization (-xO1 to -xO5) ;
- if I prototype my function at the beginning of my source (void fnc1(long a,long b,long c,long d,long e,long f,long g,long h););
I have over 1,000,000 lines of existing code to support. I am afraid using optimization would have other impacts and for now, I cast the arguments as problems are reported. Would there be a better way to handle this? By using a compiler switch?
Thanks in advance.

Tom.Truscott wrote:
clamage45 wrote:
But if you are passing to an ellipsis, you either cast actual arguments to the type the function expects, or the function extracts the default promoted type. Such code always works ...Yes, and developers should attempt to accomplish just that. Alas this is very difficult to ensure, particularly given the lack of a run-time type checking mechanism.In theory, proper use of the ellipsis function would be documented, and programmers would read and follow the documentation. In practice, some programmers don't read the instructions, or forget them, or someone ill-advisedly changes the way the function works so that existing calls stop working. Variable-argument functions are a fragile mechanism. (I program almost exclusively in C++, which has combinations of features such that variable-argument functions are rarely, if ever, needed.)
Can one even assume that the value of the NULL macro is correct? Never, because the C standard allows a variety of definitions for NULL, and implementations vary. Passing NULL to an ellipsis is a recipe for failure. Don't do it.
>
Suppose you have function FI with an ellipsis that expects to get int arguments, and another FL that expects to get long arguments. When you port the code to a 64-bit environment, function FL fails. If you use the -signext option, function FI will fail.Ah, but for us FL never fails, since the compilers always widen the arguments. I fail to see the circumstance in which widening would cause FI to fail, could you please give a more specific example?
void FI(int count, ...)
    va_list va;
    va_start(va, count);
    int t;
    while( --count >= 0) {
       t = va_arg(va, int);
       do_something(t);
}Function FI expects to extract 32-bit int arguments. If compiled with -signext, the calling function will pass 64-bit arguments. Perhaps the -signext option also causes the 32-bit extraction to be changed to a 64-bit extraction. I have no personal experience with the option, and I'm not in a position where I can experiment right now.

Oracle 9i for Solaris Intel

I would like to use my PC (x86 platform) to install Solaris 8 for Intel as a Database server. But I cannot found any information of Oracle 9i Database for Solaris Intel platform. WHere I can find it? Or Oracle don't support for Solaris for Intel (I found an Oracle 9i Database for Solaris SPARC only).
Best regards

The last version of Oracle for Solaris X86 was Oracle 8.1.7...

CDE Support on Solaris 8

Hi all !
I have just installed Solaris 8 for Intel on a laptop. After lots of hassel with the video-driver, I got this working by installing Accelerated-X Laptop Display Server. But here it comes .... However,
Xwindows functions OK, whereas CDE fails. Has anyone had similar experience, and more importantly has anyone resolved the problem ?

I am sorry but Workshop 4.2 is supported on Solaris 7 and 8. I don't
see why it shouldn't be. If your statement means that Solaris 7
distribution doesn't come along with Workshop 4.2, then ignore my
statement, I am not sure of that. But Workshop 4.2 will work on both
Solaris 7 and Solaris 8.
Rajag.

RFC SDK connect call fails for NW2004s SPS13 if password in lowercase

Hi all,
I am running a sample rfc program on solaris m/c.
SAP server details
2004s SPS13
I am using a communication user to connect to server using RFC SDK.
If i connect to the server with password in smaller case it gives aerror message
"Name or password is incorrect"
But if i give the password in capital case,it works fine.
BAsically i have to create a user with acapital password to work fine on SPS13
ON SPS12 it worked fine for lower case password.
Best Regards
Manoj

Please note the header of this forum: "This forum is dedicated to all other development-related questions which are not directly addressed by other forums. This includes Business Objects SDKs, products, or technologies which do not fall under BusinessObjects Enterprise, BusinessObjects Edge, Crystal Reports Server, or Crystal Reports (for example Desktop Intelligence SDK, Universe Designer SDK, Portal Integration Kits, Java User Function Libraries, and other third party technologies or development languages). "
I do not think you are using any of the products described above. Please post to the correct forum.
Ludek

RFC SDK support on solaris-intel?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for