(RFC vs files), where Sender SAP and receiver multiple system

Publish and Subscribe using BPM or Without BPM (RFC vs files), where Sender SAP and receivers multiple system,.
This is my 1st BPM scenario in sandbox system
For this scenario
I Created 2 Data types
2 MT,
Service interface:
Request interface Mode:Asynchronous
Abstract Req interface,Mode:Asynchronous
Response Interface,Mode:Asynchronous
Abstract Respomse Interface ,Mode:Aysnchronous
Synchronous Interface ,Mode:Synchronous
2 Message mapping for Req and Resp
1 Operation Mapping
BPM design: Plz find the attatchement
Can anyone please help me how many Interface determinations,receiver determinations ,sender agreements,receiver agreements need to create for this.......
It will be good if anyone send the BPM design flow for this.........
can we do this scenario without BPM?
Regards
A.Muni kumar
Edited by: Muni 1234 on Jan 31, 2012 10:24 AM

Hi
Receiver is FTP only.....
SAP side is RFC.........
RFC sender will be initiating the scenario, and there is receiver is File, PI should go to file directory and take the file then send it back to RFC as response.
Sender: RFC
Receiver: File
1. is this scenario with condition based routing.. so that each time outof many receiver systems it will trigger any specific system.
if above is the case then you can achive this without BPM also..
Yes...its condition based routing...
I Used async in this scenario.....sender side configurations also done....
But when when I am triggering BAPI from SE37 I am getting an error
Exception SYSTEM_FAILURE
Message ID: 00 Message number: 341
Message:
Runtime error CALL_FUNCTION_NOT_FOUND has occurred
How to Solve this????
I checked the RFC destination which i created in TCP/IP..a nd i mentioned the same in se37 RFC target system..
Connection is Ok
Or we need to create proxy for MI and report for this?
Edited by: Muni 1234 on Feb 1, 2012 8:38 AM

Similar Messages

Sender DEBIT and receiver DEBIT

Dear all,
I notice in settlement, there are 2 button : sender and receiver. Now, what confused me is why both also called sender debit and receiver debit?
Why both also DEBIT?
Please advise me.
Thanks

Dear All,
I see mostly it is like that where sender debit and receiver debit. If you go into KO88 previous settlement, you will get this.
I read in forum also it is explaining in debit.
You assign the debit cost element groups to a settlement cost element.
You settle by cost element - that is, the debit cost element is the settlement cost element.
so i would like to know why the title is sender debit and receiver debit. why both debit.
thanks

Regarding Sender query and receiver query

Hi Masters
I have one sender query and receiver query. Both queries contain G/L account.
First I got sender query report, in this report I drill down one free charactteristics field to get correponding field sales document in receiver report.
Is it mandatory which field i drill down in sender report should be in receiver report?
Could you please help ?
Thanks in Advance
Raja.S

I would rewrite the first one to:
Select t.id_entity,t.id_trade_ref,p.am_stock
from trade t,posting p
where t.id_trade_ref = '5V973781B'
and p.id_trade_ref = t.id_trade_ref
This way, you really make the join between the table.
I think the join is better because it uses less code. I do not think you will notice much performance win between one or the other, especially because it concerns only a few rows.

Send Task and Receive Task

In our beta test, we came upon several issues, one of them is when we create a BPMN process that consists of the following simple flow: Start -> User Task 1 -> Send Task -> User Task 2 -> Receive Task -> User Task 3 -> End
When we deploy and run the flow, it always stops at the Receive Task. But when we remove User Task 2 from the flow and redeploy and run, the process runs fine all the way to the end. I am wondering if this is a bug in BPM 11g where if you put an activity between Send Task and Receive Task, it does not work, but when you do not have a task between Send Task and Receive Task, it works fine. Can someone confirm this scenario please?
Within the Send Task and Receive Task, we are invoking a BPEL process that has a simple asynchronous service. The Send Task invokes the BPEL process, and the Receive Task has the callback to the BPEL process.
Makes sense?
Thanks.

What does the bpel process do? Does it work with a synchronous bpel process?
I think you should submit an SR for this since it works when there is no activity between the send/receive.
Heidi.

PI 7.1 Sender Interface and Receiver Interface gets interchanged

Hi All,
I m facing a strange problem in PI 7.1
For many of my scenarios, the Sender Interface, sender namespace and receiver Interface, receiver namespace information gets interchanged and displayed incorrectly.
But sometimes its working fine.
When we analysed the Log messages, found that, after xml validation step, the sender and reciever interface gets interchanged.
Any idea why this happens?
How to rectify this error?

Aarthi,
Please check your message interfaces once again. Sender is outbound and Receiver is inbound.
Also please check your receiver determination.
Regards,
---Satish

I need an application that will enable my ipad to receive calls, make calls , send sms and receive sms. line2 is not available in south africa

i need an application that will enable my ipad to receive calls, make calls send sms and receive sms. line2 is not available in south africa

Skype would be a possibility for phone calls, though I don't know if it's available in SA. Search the iTunes Store for "SMS" and you'll quickly see if there are any SMS apps you can try.
Regards.

Communication between SAP and 3rd Party Systems using IDOC HTTP XML Interfa

Hi
i am try do
Communication between SAP and 3rd Party Systems using IDOC HTTP XML Interface
With The help of SDN Contribution
link----
( have look on it)
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/4943f2b7-0a01-0010-37af-faff35b2f08c
I am getting error in
Partner system as HTTPLOG and "Execute" to check the results
Error is -- Port could not be created
RFC destination HTTPLOG Not specified for system HTTPLOG
any 1 have any idea if plzzzzzzzz...........
Thank u
Ram

Hello .
we are also in process of implementing the same
could you share the knowledge pl?
1)is it a separate add on with ALE to saphr
or using ECC ??
2)can u share the configuration part ??
we are trying it on webas as addon 3.0 .

Sender IDOC and Receiver Soap

Hi,
I dont Know how to do the Scenario.
I never used Sender IDOC in XI.
I am Using Now.
Cany Any one of u Explain in Detail about Sender IDOC How to configure..
I Dont Know How to define Logical system and where to define and when to use.
I need compl,ete Information/
Ponts willbe awarded.
Regards,
Jayasimha
[email protected]

Hi ,
Go thru this Blog for posting the IDoc from R/3 to XI.
<a href="/people/ravikumar.allampallam/blog/2005/02/23/configuration-steps-required-for-posting-idocsxi Steps for Posting IDOC's</a> by Ravikumar Allampalam
<a href="/people/swaroopa.vishwanath/blog/2007/01/22/ale-configuration-for-pushing-idocs-from-sap-to-xi Configuration for Pushing IDOC's from SAP to XI</a> by Swaroopa Vishwanath
This Blog explains the RFC to WEBSERVICE scenario.
Configure your scenario like this except making the changes to the sender as IDoc instead of RFC.
<a href="/people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2006/03/23/rfc--xi--webservice--a-complete-walkthrough-part-1 -> XI -> WebService - A Complete Walkthrough (Part 1)</a> by Shabarish Vijayakumar
<a href="/people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2006/03/28/rfc--xi--webservice--a-complete-walkthrough-part-2 -> XI -> WebService - A Complete Walkthrough (Part 2)</a> by Shabarish Vijayakumar
Regards
Santhosh
Remember to set the thread to solved when you have received a solution
[url=Use a Good Subject Line, One Question Per Posting - Award Points; Use a Good Subject Line, One Question Per Posting - Award Points[/url]

IDOC Sender Adapter and Receiver Adapter

Hi,
Why we don't require IDOC Sender Adapter to communicate with PI and why IDOC Receiver Adapter is required to communicate with SAP ?
Regards,
J Augastine

Hi,
>>>Why we don't require IDOC Sender Adapter to communicate with PI
you're talking about sender and receiver agreements right ?
as this adapter is based on abap stack - with new functionalities of IDOC adapter
require sender agreement
>>>and why IDOC Receiver Adapter is required to communicate with SAP ?
as we need to put the RFC to the destination system somewhere...
Regards,
Michal Krawczyk

Are sending box and receiving box IDOC same?

my sending client is Box1, receiving client is Box2, every month, we send GL balance from box1 to box2 thrugh IDOC
I compare WE82, WE30, SM59, WE20, all setting are same in BOX1 and Box2. I doubt this, in SM59, we only maintain RFC connection to Box2 in both Box1 and Box2.
Are the above correct? under what circustance, we should maintain different configuration in box1 and box2 for GL balance transmission?

Hi anand,
in we 19 when you send the idoc, the sender port refers to the port used by R3 to send the idoc and the reciver port is the port used by XI to recive the idocs.
If you are going to use the same sender and receiver port, then where is your idoc being sent from r3 back to r3??
Regards,
Bhavesh

Mail sending issue and receiving sound intermittent

I have three mail accounts on the 3G iPhone if that matters.
The primary SMTP server I have setup for when using email at home on wi-fi. Set up the same as on the Mac to the ISP I connect to. Works fine sending and receiving on the iPhone.
Under other SMTP servers I have set to reflect the mobile provider I connect to when not on wi-fi.
The only way I can send mail using the mobile provider is to turn off the primary server.
The instructions on the screen say " If mail is unsuccessful using the primary server it will try the other SMTP servers in succession. Clearly not doing this as if it can't connect using the primary server it doesn't continue searching through other servers.
Anyone else experiencing the same problem?
In addition the sound on receiving mail is intermittent and generally doesn't work. If it does it only works the one and then only one of the three accounts. And then goes away again.
I was hoping that the 2.1 update may have fixed both of these.

Bump

Error proxy call not permitted on sender side and receiver side

</SAP:ReliableMessaging>
- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
<SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="INTERNAL">PROXY_NOT_ALLOWED_ON_IS</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1 />
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>Proxy calls are not permitted on sender or receiver side on the IS (client)</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
- <SAP:HopList xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
- <SAP:Hop timeStamp="2010-05-31T05:11:40Z" wasRead="false">
<SAP:Engine type="AE">af.mid.sdxid008</SAP:Engine>
<SAP:Adapter namespace="http://sap.com/xi/XI/System">XIRA</SAP:Adapter>
<SAP:MessageId>682F03D4-27A2-4295-0DC2-F296CFE1CA49</SAP:MessageId>
<SAP:Info />
</SAP:Hop>
iN THE RESPONSE SIDE
<SAP:P1 />
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>Proxy calls are not permitted on sender or receiver side on the IS (client)</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
+ <SAP:HopList xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
- <SAP:Hop timeStamp="2010-05-31T05:11:40Z" wasRead="false">
<SAP:Engine type="AE">af.mid.sdxid008</SAP:Engine>
<SAP:Adapter namespace="http://sap.com/xi/XI/System">XIRA</SAP:Adapter>
<SAP:MessageId>682F03D4-27A2-4295-0DC2-F296CFE1CA49</SAP:MessageId>
<SAP:Info />
</SAP:Hop>
- <SAP:Hop timeStamp="2010-05-31T05:11:42Z" wasRead="false">
<SAP:Engine type="BS">INTEGRATION_SERVER_MID</SAP:Engine>
<SAP:Adapter namespace="http://sap.com/xi/XI/System">XI</SAP:Adapter>
<SAP:MessageId>682F03D4-27A2-4295-0DC2-F296CFE1CA49</SAP:MessageId>
<SAP:Info>3.0</SAP:Info>
</SAP:Hop>
</SAP:HopList>
- <SAP:RunTime xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">

you are sending messages to an integration server.
what is you scenario?
Not that you cannot make a proxy call to PI
you can only make calls to systems or client that are configured as application system in SXM|B_ADM -> Integration engine configuration
More: /people/vijaya.kumari2/blog/2006/01/26/how-do-you-activate-abap-proxies

HT201320 Trying to send mail and receiving error msg "the recipient was rejected by the server"

Setting up new email account and getting above MSG when trying to send. Can receive mail ok to the account. Can send/receive fine to other accounts on the device.

Try going into Settings > Mail, Contacts, Calendars > select the account > account name , tap on SMTP (under the 'Outgoing Mail Server' heading) and then tap on your Primary Server and try entering your email account and password and see if it then works

Different PO item number in SAP and in external system

We are sending Purchase Orders to external system via Idoc and receiving dispatch advices (Inbound delivery) from the external systems via Idoc. In SAP PO line items are numbered as 10,20,30....... In the external system the line items are numbered as 1,2,3........
So when Inbound delivery is received into SAP from external system it is failing due to line item numbers are not matching.
I got info that this issue can be resolved by using fields E1EDL24-POSNR and E1EDL24-POSEX correctly. I do not know exactly how.The Idoc type used is DESADV.
Please help with this issue.

You can see these fields in WE02 when you process with your idoc number.If you want to edit idoc POsnr from 1...10 then you can edit idoc through we19 transaction.
If you want perminanat solution then check with ABAPer to pass one zero after line item number as your external system passes 1,2....10..etc.
This can possible check with your technical team.

Question: clean and use multiple System Preparation

Hi there, I am curious if this is possible:
- How to clean the system preparation once it is set up ? I mean, I can create a system preparation, but I'd like to
re-create it, and I dont see any "delete" button for erase the current system prep params.
- is it possible to have multiple system preparations profiles ? or is it one for each pool?
thanks again.
-Oswaldo

Hi Oswaldo,
You can edit the system preparation file using the 'Edit System Preparation File' link on the Cloning tab of a Pool. There is no delete action for the system preparation but you can use the 'Apply System Preparation' checkbox on the Cloning tab of a Pool to enable or disable its use during cloning which will give you a similar end result.
You can only have one system preparation file per pool
Stephen

(RFC vs files), where Sender SAP and receiver multiple system

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for