RFx response

Hi Experts,
SRM 7 EHP 1
ECC 6 EHP 5
PPS scenario
We have created a RFx and the bidder is able to view the RFx details in the worklist. However the option of providing bidder price details at line item level is inactive. All necessary number ranges, transaction types for QUOT have been maintained. Switch for Adaptable RFx Response Handling is also active.
Please provide pointers.
Thanks & Regards,
Amish

Hello,
Kindly ensure that you are using the correct role here.
With SRM 701 , you should use the new bidder role i.e.  /SAPSRM/BIDDER_EHP1 .
Also follow the Sap note 1270412 : Item Level fields become invisible.
Reported issue here generally happens due to refresh of Metadata table entries.
Hope this will help you to resolve the error.
Thanks & Best Regards,
Rahul

Similar Messages

  • PO  creation From accepted RFx response

    Hi,
    Please can you help ME, i am not able to create PO of services, here is my process :
    SC created in SRM - > SC goes to sourcing -> buyer creates RFx -> RFx is sent to bidder -> bidder processes RFx Response -> buyer accepts RFx response -> buyer creates follow on document (PO) from RFx Response (create PO).
    Error message:  /SAPPSSRM/HIER 015
    Product type XXX  of item differs from type XXX of product XXX.
    N.B : PO based on materials number work fine.
    Thank you,
    Karim

    Hello Ivy,
    I'm working with Karim, here are the maintained entries:
    (I've not listed all Z entries, they have all the same assignments)
    BIDP    HIER_SE   
    BIDX    HIER_SRM   
    ECPO    HIER_SRM   
    EXTR    HIER_SE   
    PCTR    HIER_SRM    Achat de services
    QUOT    HIER_SRM    Achat de services
    RFCR    HIER_SRM   
    RFPM    HIER_SRM   
    RFPP    HIER_SRM   
    RFPS    HIER_SRM   
    RFQU    HIER_SRM   
    ZAMI    HIER_SRM   
    ZAVN    HIER_SRM   
    ZBCC    HIER_SRM   
    ZCRS    HIER_SRM   
    ZCTR    HIER_SRM   
    ZCVN    HIER_SRM   
    ZMAL    HIER_SRM   
    ZMCA    HIER_SRM   
    ZMCR    HIER_SRM   
    Thanks in advance
    Stéphane

  • Can't Create Contract From RFx Response (SAP SRM 7.0)

    Dear Expert,
    Could you help me,
    i have create rfx, response the rfx and accepted the rfx response.
    After i have accepted that RFx, i would like to make a contract from this RFx response. Via menu Create Contract.
    But this error is show up.
    Error application is coming up.
    20111020
    RHESAS
    093450
    sapgsd
    http://sapgsd.garuda-indonesia.com:8011/sap/bc/webdynpro/sapsrm/wda_l_fpm_oif
    OBJECTS_OBJREF_NOT_ASSIGNED
    Access via 'NULL' object reference not possible.
    Method: PST95E57RQRHC49FBLT5QTJBJT9Z of program /1BCWDY/NC67WCWB50U4IGZ40GZ1==CP
    Method: IF_WDR_VIEW_DELEGATE~WD_DO_MODIFY_VIEW of program /1BCWDY/NC67WCWB50U4IGZ40GZ1==CP
    Method: DO_MODIFY_VIEW of program CL_WDR_DELEGATING_VIEW========CP
    Method: MODIFY_VIEW of program CL_WDR_VIEW===================CP
    Method: DO_MODIFY_VIEW of program CL_WDR_CLIENT_COMPONENT=======CP
    Method: DO_MODIFY_VIEW of program CL_WDR_WINDOW_PHASE_MODEL=====CP
    Method: PROCESS_REQUEST of program CL_WDR_WINDOW_PHASE_MODEL=====CP
    Method: PROCESS_REQUEST of program CL_WDR_WINDOW=================CP
    Method: EXECUTE of program CL_WDR_MAIN_TASK==============CP
    Method: IF_WDR_RUNTIME~EXECUTE of program CL_WDR_MAIN_TASK==============CP
    http://sapgsd.garuda-indonesia.com:8011/sap/bc/webdynpro/sapsrm/wda_l_fpm
    Do you have any idea to solve this issue?
    (we are activate Procurement for Public Sector Functions )
    Regards,
    Rhesa Syahrial

    Hi All,
    I have solved this issue.
    I missed the configuration in Partner Grouping schema ID.
    Regards,
    Rhesa Syahrial

  • Collaborators in SAP Sourcing 10.0 must not view RFx responses unless assigned as scoreres

    Dear SAP Sourcing Specialists,
    We are implementing SAP Sourcing 10.0 We assign collaborators on an RFx as
    with the collaborator approver role before it is published, and these collaborators
    review, edit and  approve the RFx and then it is published to suppliers. After responses are  received from suppliers and RFx is now in
    Closed for Responses phase, we do not want these original collaborators to view the RFx responses unless they are assigned as scorers.
    How do we achieve this? We tried to re-assign the  Review collaborator role to these collaborators but they can still view RFx
    responses.
    Steps to reproduce the issue:
    1.Create an RFx in SAP Sourcing 10
    2. Assign collaborators with approval role
    3. Collaborators approve RFx
    4. Move RFx to Open for Responses
    5. Suppliers respond to RFx
    6. Rfx closes. RFx becomes "Closed for Responses"
    7. Log in as one of the collaborators
    8. We do not want the collaborator to view RFx responses unless assigned as a
    scorerer
    Kind regards
    Pedzi

    Why don't just use standard functionality in Page Customisations?
    You can Hide/Unhide a Tab with Dimension Field <%USER_GROUP%> and Group Reference.
    It's a clean, standard way and guaranteed to work and not break anything.
    Bogdan Toma

  • Create RFx Response: An error occurred in the PD Layer transaction terminated

    Hello Experts,
    Currently we are in SRM 7.02 implemenation: we are facing below problem while creating RFx response with popup screen.
                             "An error occurred in the PD Layer transaction terminated"
    For this we have checked below
    1. http://scn.sap.com/thread/1912966    ----> it didn't help
    2. We have assigned SAP_ALL role to bidder also ----> Facing same issue
    3. Check Number ranges ---> everything is fine.
    there is no clue from above points.
    Thanks & Regards
    Sandeep.

    Hello Sandeep,
    I am facing the same problem while creating the RFx response in SUS side. Same error occurred while i am creating the Rfx response with bidder.
    error: An error occurred in the PD Layer transaction terminated
    Could you please let me know, did you find any solution for this issue?
    Thanks in advance!!
    Thanks,
    Anil

  • A fatal error occured in the PD Layer during create Supplier RFx response

    Dear SRM 7 Experts,
    I am implementing SRM 7.  I can successfully create a Supplier RFx Response on behalf of a supplier using the Surrogate Bid functionality.  However, if I log on as a supplier contact person and try to create a Supplier RFx Response, I get error u201D A fatal error occured in the PD Layer. The transaction needs to be terminatedu201D. 
    Number ranges for Supplier RFx response (BUS2202) are maintained and assigned to the transaction type correctly.
    What could be the problem? 
    Kind regards
    Pedzi

    Hi
    Here is the thread which solved the same problem:
    Re: A fatal error occured in the PD Layer during RFx response
    with regards
    Manjunath

  • A fatal error occured in the PD Layer during RFx response

    Dear Experts,
    While creating the RFx response the error is,
    "A fatal error occured in the PD Layer. The transaction needs to be terminated."
    I just checked the earlier threads discussed on this forum says, this is due to non maintaining of number ranges , but i have maintained the no ranges for RFx response,
    got stuck here, kindly help me to solve this issue.
    Thanks

    Sorry  wrongly posted...  the details are below.
    The Rfx response no range 01 & 02 are matching with transaction type Supplier quote 01 & 02,
    In Define Transaction type -- for Transaction category BUS2200 -- Transaction type RFQU -- the entries are
    *Tran.cat            Trns.type                     subsequent obj.type                     Follow up trns.type
    *Bus2200            RFQU                            BUS2202                                     ECPO
    The entries are correct or not???
    Regards
    Rakesh

  • Condition type error in RFx response

    Dear Experts,
    I have created a new condition type with condition class Discounts/percentages
    and with Fixed amount.
    This created a condition type i ahve mainatined in the "process condition group" under maintanace group '01QU' so that i can excluisvely use for at the RFx response.
    When i am processing the RFx response i am getting an error
    "A fatal error occured in the PD Layer. The transaction needs to be terminated."
    Kindly advise .
    The intention is i have to certain condition types exclusively at the time of RFx response.

    Hi Saha,
    I have not create a new condition in my template, but... I have the same error when I try to create a Quot as Vendor "A fatal error occured in the PD Layer. The transaction needs to be terminated".
    I´m in SRM 7.0 with SP 08.
    Any Idea?
    Thanks,
    Pedro Marques

  • Extended Classic Purchase Order created from RFx Response having complex pricing conditions enabled

    Hello Colleagues,
    I am currently analysing the correct usage of the complex pricing conditions in the sourcing process and wanted to understand the usage of the complex pricing condtions ( 01CT , dis % , header disc% , location dependent conditions , etc. with or without scales , ) while creating a extended classic purchase order directly as follow on document from rfx response.
    How relevant is the price conditions 01CT. Consider a case if the price condition from rfx response to po is changed to price manual 01PB but the price is correctly copied when the po is initially created from rfx response.
    Is this is the correct system behaviour ?
    Kindly help to clarify the above points.
    Thanks & Best Regards,
    Rahul

    Hi
    <b> You can either of these BADIs to handlwe the scenario.</b>
    BBP_CREATE_BE_PO_NEW Exit while creating a purchase order in the backend system
    BBP_CREATE_PO_BACK   OLD Exit while creating a PO in the backend system     
    BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI  ECS: PO Transfer to Logistics Backend                  
    BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI  Control Extended Classic Scenario  
    Hope this will help.
    Please reward suitable points.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Item info gets blanked while creating RFx response

    Hi,
    I am facing a strange issue while creating the RFx response (SRM 7.0).
    when I try to create a Bid, the item info (required quantity and Unit) gets blanked and this fields are blocked.
    Did any one faced any similar issue. Any possible solutions.
    Regards,
    Francisco Salvado

    Hi,
    This subject is widely discussed in SDN, you could have searched SDN before posting this thread.
    As you do not have info record, then tax code defaulted in the Purchase order by maintaining condition record only  with your material (may be with other criteria)which you said item number 10.More details on default tax code, check link:
    Default Tax code in P.O
    Also check link for SDN rules
    https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/HOME/RulesofEngagement
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • How to hide Total value in RFX response webdynpro component

    HI experts,
           We are working on SRM 7.0 and there is a requirement to hide the Total Value that appers on RFX Response Header for a particular Role.The webdynpro component is FPM_IDR_COMPONENT and View is IDR_VIEW..I have searched the SDN and found that CL_FPM_IDR class methods can be used to hide the Items.But method SET_ITEMS_VISIBILITY sets the visibility for all items,but i want for a particular pair.Please advise me how to hide this field value pair dynamically.
    Regards
    Sonika

    What you might try is to remove the particular key_value pair from the lt_items table which is passed to the IDR.
    So search in(WDA/Assistance class/Feeder class ) and find out the place ,from where this table is filled and called to set items on IDR.
    Remove the pair before from table before the call to IDR.

  • Blank Line Item for Rfx Response with Limit Item

    Hi All,
    I have a problem in rfx response for limit item. When creating RFx for limit item, I am using display limit as 'Available to Bid On' and using short text in RFx line item (not using product code). But when bidder creating rfx response, all field in line item is blank (no short text, product category, currency, etc) and bidder need to click on details to see item data. Is this a standard?FYI I'am using SRM 7.0 with extended classic scenario.
    I already try display limit as 'Accept or Reject Possible' but the problem still persists.
    Rgds,
    Aleluya.

    Hello Aleluya,
    As per standard system behaviour you user should be able to see these details in the Item overview screen itself. There is no need to navigate to the details of the same to view them.
    Only to enter price bidder needs to go details of the limit item.
    Have you done any custom changes for the reported scenario here or you are using the standard feature.
    Best Regards,
    Rahul

  • How do you hide RFx responses on SAP Sourcing 10.0?

    Hi gurus,
    I'm new on SAP Sourcing 10.0. I want to know where can I go to write a script that will enable me to hide RFx responses. I want to write a script that will hide the RFx Responses tab so that all collaborators assigned to the RFx will not see the RFx responses unless they are assigned to scoring.

    Why don't just use standard functionality in Page Customisations?
    You can Hide/Unhide a Tab with Dimension Field <%USER_GROUP%> and Group Reference.
    It's a clean, standard way and guaranteed to work and not break anything.
    Bogdan Toma

  • After approver reject RFx response(QUOT), is that possible tho open back?

    Hi Gurus,
    We are now implementing SRM 7 EHp 1 and with workflow in RFx creation and evaluation. During RFx evaluation, once the approval reject the quotation and the status will turn into REJECTED. Is there anyway to open back the quotation in order leave it as rejected.
    There is few scenario we facing at the moment.
    1. 5 lines item. Bidder A been partial award 3 items and Bidder B partial award 2 item. Both quotation route to approval in awaiting approver status. If approval reject bidder A quotation and put a remark to purchaser that bidder B should get the full award (5 items). Is that possible to handle by the system?
    2. 5 lines item. Bidder A been partial award 3 items and Bidder B partial award 2 item. Both quotation route to approval in awaiting approver status. The approval reject bidder A and accept bidder B. Could system handle the 3 items back to the sourcing cockpit?
    Best regards,
    Wind

    Hello Wind,
    Kindly refer to the thread Re: Quotation in Release Rejected Status, how does the purchaser can review it? , to solve your issue here.
    As per the standard functionality delivered with SRM 701, purchaser user should be allowed to view the details for the Rejected RFx response and he also he will be provided with the Undo Reject option to re-submit the response for approval to the purchasing manager.
    Hope this helps you.
    Best Regards,
    Rahul

  • System not generating RFX Response

    Hello Everyone,
    When i am moving the RFX to open for response phase a new Rfx Response tab is added but no response is generating, its showing
                       "The responses are being generated by a background process. Try again later".
    and Also in Open for Respnse phase rfx is not visible at Supplier side.
    Please Can anyone help me to solve this issue.
    Regards
    Rakesh

    Hi,
    It's hard to tell without looking at the screen. Here are a few generic things to check though:
    1. The supplier contact invited on the RFx is setup on the Supplier portal with appropirate security to be able to view and respond to the RFx.
    2. In the Schedule tab, check for the start and end times (due date).
    3. When you change the phase to Open for response, check the log file to see if any error messages were generated.
    Hope this helps,
    Vikram Shukla

  • How to integrate WD url in standard RFX response task

    Hi Experts,
                       we have set up a process controlled workflow for RFX response in SRM,The standard task used is 40007981,the problem is we have to integrate one webdynpro link inside the task,the process is to first determine the webdynpro URL using FM(as it will change from dev to quality system) and then use the URL value in task description for creating a hyperlink.I have used the same approch in application controlled workflow,But here the task is standard,So not sure how to make changes in the task??i want to understand will coping the task into another task and using the ztask will work??or i have to create enhancements in standard task itself?if i follow the second approach what will be the impact and most importantly? willl that work?
    Regards
    Sonika

    Hi,
    Yes, you can copy the standard task by using transaction PFTC_COP and then modify it as per your requirement.
    After making all changes use this task in your workflow.
    Thanks and regards,
    SNJY

Maybe you are looking for

  • Difference between logical file path and physical file path

    Hi, Can anyone tell me why logical file path is required and why physical file path is required? What exactly is the difference bet them? Thanks in advance. Regards, PS.

  • Can't view iPhone files in new iTunes.

    Prior to upgrading iTunes, I could see my iPhone and files (music, books, etc.) in the column to the left.  I cannot find this information in the current version of iTunes.

  • Help with vendor  enhacement

    hai to all experts, i have a requirement when we create vendor (xk01) if the city is hyderabad then in the lfa1 table the vendor number should be saved as example 'hyd96554' . i have already writen the code in include ZXF05U01 in function module EXIT

  • IPhoto assigns Dec. 31, 1969 to all imports.

    Started using iPhoto '11, 9.4.2 around the end of December 2012. I keep having to manually adjust date on all my imports because iPhoto assigns Dec. 31, 1969 to all. Camera date is set correctly. iPhoto Library Manager date is set correctly. I don't

  • Contribute 3 & Flashpaper

    Hello. I have contribute 3 installed on XP pro. Each time i try to open a word doc (office 2003) contribute 3 pops a message up saying it's trying to install. I have read this is something to do with a problem with flashpaper 2. Please could someone