RG 23 Part II posting not done

RG 23 Part II posting not done-this error is coming while doing MIRO.Pls solve.

P1175357 wrote:
RG 23 Part II posting not done-this error is coming while doing MIRO.Pls solve.
HI,
Can You elaborate your question?.
AND also once check the seetings in spro->img->Logistics - General->Tax on Goods Movements->India->Maintain Excise Groups
in that dont check the post ei in migo and save
after completion of migo
do j1iex for capture the value
after that do miro.
Thanking you.

Similar Messages

  • Error-RG23 Part-2 posting not yet done in MIRO

    Hi Expert,
    While doing MIRO, i am getting Error-RG23 Part 2 posting not yet done.
    While analysis, i came to know that, user did 101 and then 102 and then J1IEX in 2014.
    After that did new MIGO-101 in 2015 with same Excise Number-00917.
    When i go to J1IEX and enter Vendor Excise Invoice-00917, it shows 2 Lines 2013-In Process and 2014-Posted.
    So whether Error in MIRO is due to Excise Invoice for 2013
    If yes what activity can be done for Excise Invoice for 2013

    What ever the case, If the Material document is canceled through MIGO then Excise invoice has to be Posted and Canceled in J1IEX provided Part 1 and Part2 were captured earlier for the Excise invoice.
    Now in your case, Could you tell us whether you had posted Part 1 and Part 2 for the 101 Material document posted earlier in year 2013.
    If you had posted Part 1 and Part 2 then you have to Post the Excise invoice and Cancel the same in J1IEX. If not, the status would be In process always.If you do not want to cancel the Excise invoice, you only have the following options.
    1) Configure the message as a Warning Message for Certain user and ask the user to Post MIRO.
    2) change the status of the excise invoice in J_1IEXCHDR, J_1IEXCDTL, J_1IGRXREF.

  • Document not found. Excise posting not done or document is archived.

    Hi,
    I have created an order, delivery and billing document. Billing doc has been released to accounting. However though the accounting doc has been generated, the excise invoice is not generated and also BED, EDCESS & VAT amount not disable. When I was doing the Excise invoice (T code: j1iin) I got the following error
    Modvat utilization done already for XXXXXX of Delivery No: XXXXX
    Message no. 8I446
    Diagnosis
      Modvat utilization done already for mentioned billing document
    Procedure
      Check the billing document entered
    If I click on display button after that I got error like
    Document not found. Excise posting not done or document is archived.
    Message no. 8I301
    Diagnosis
    The entered document number could not be found either because it is not
    correct or the document has been archived
    Procedure
    Please check the entered document number
    Plz help me what cud be the reason for that.
    Regards
    LVK

    Dear LVK
    Go to SE16, input Table J_1IEXCHDR and execute.  There input the excise invoice number and execute.  Check whether system is showing a document.  Alternatively, without giving any data in the above table, just give the excise invoice date and execute.  Check whether the said  excise invoice is stored in the table.
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Blocking manual output when posting not done

    Hi Friends,
    we have a  requirement where invoice output should not be allowed when the finance posting is not done. i know we can do this by adding a routine for output type in procedure. but this works only in case of automatic determination. But, we need to restrict in case of manual addition also. when the user tries to trigger manually, the system should throw an error message.
    thanks in advance...

    There is no way to restrict the users from creating the output manually. Requirements are not checked for manually created output lines (a message will be displayed).
    There might be some brutal ways, such as a modification or taking away output authorization from the users completely and creating output by a background job, but it might cause more problems than do good.
    This is mostly a training issue - just train the users not to try and force the output, if none was created. Its for their own benefit.

  • Miro posting error : RG23 posting not yet done.

    Dear Experts,
       IN GR DOES NOT CAPTURE EXCISE INVOICE, that means part 1 not done & in po also does not apply excise duty BUT AT THE TIME OF MIRO POSTING ASKS PART II POSTING NOT YET DONE.
    PLEASE HELP.
    THANKS,
    Sachin.
    Edited by: sachin shelke on Dec 6, 2008 6:48 AM
    Edited by: sachin shelke on Dec 6, 2008 6:52 AM

    Hi,
    Ask the concerned taxation team to do the part II entry through J1IEX and then do the MIRO.
    Regards

  • During cancelation of MIRO document giving error message "RG23 Part II post

    Dear guru's,
    I am facing a tipical issue while i am going to reverse the MIRO document it is giving error "RG23 Part II posting not yet done" .
    Senario is -- user has created MIGO  with Myp103  and then 105, system promted excise tab and excise ref.  and excise date is their .
    But no Part1 generated.
    So no part2 .
    Now A/c has passed the bill and fi doc generated.  Now we want revrse this bill (MIRO) and respectively MIGO (105/103 ) and again capture it with correct excise entry.
    we want to understand, How this happned at 105 why part1 not generated and with out part2 how bill passed.
    now waht can bo done to reverse this.
    thanks in advance.
    Ajeet

    Hello,
    Please check the status of excise invoices if they are "In process" stage. Unless the status is "Posted" you will not be allowed to do MIRO. Further, select only those line items which belong to excise invoice.
    Another possibillity of the error could be that the user must have changed the excise invoice date after it was referred in MIGO.
    If so, to avoid such issues and to stop the users from doing the above, please review the notes : 1285986, 1346926, 1406505.
    I hope this helps.
    Thanks and regards,
    Suresh.

  • J1IEX Part 2 Posting !!

    HI
    We capture excise during MIGO and without posting part2 we try to do MIRO then the system should give error/warning
    "part2 posting not done yet"
    Where do we activate this ?
    Thank You

    Hi Aditi,
    No custom development is required. SAP provides a standard confugurable message 8I 478 which can be configured to be an error message for MIRO per user.
    The message 8I 478 is a configurable message & it works under the condition that excise invoice has been captured but not posted,
    ............................................................it does NOT work when excise invoice is not captured....in situations like
    only part 1 posted, or no excise entry made for a particular PO/GR.
    Please use the user exit given in the note :
    858772 > RG 23 Part II message not coming during MIRO
    This note will allow you to write you own logic on when & what parameter the system should consider to get the message in MIRO.
    Regards..

  • To have error msg for RG Part II posting

    Dear All gurus,
    presently in our system for invoice posting we have defined check for RG Part II posting as WARNING only. I want to hav it as ERROR msg. That is untill user has done Part II posting, system shud not save invoice. I checked system msgs in SPRO> MM>Log. Inv. Verification--> Def Attrbuted of System Msgs, but I cud not find that msg there. Can anyone guide me where can I change this msg to error msg.
    Warning Message is as follows
    RG23 Part II posting not yet done
    I checked in OBA5
         Message no. 8I478
    Thanks
    Edited by: sapsarang on Aug 7, 2009 2:02 PM

    HI,
    U can do it thru
    LG --> Tax on Goods Movement - India -- Tools -- Message Control .. here check 8I 478 is ava or not? if ava change the status into Error . if not ava, slect new entry and create for this msge nbr

  • Block UD saving, If stock posting is not done

    Dear Experts,
    My requirement is to block UD when a stock posting activity not completed. In standard setting, the system allows to save UD without stock posting completion.
    Is there any customization is possible to do this activity?
    So that, the system should not allow UD saving without stock posting completion.
    VRMP.

    Hi VRMP,
    Gajesh is guiding you in 100% correct way. Status Profile will work for you exactly as per your requirement.
    You will be in need to use the STD Profile "QM_L_001 - Inspection Lot Profile 1" will surely work for you. Herewith attaching some guiding links that are prepared to establish the control to prevent UD if RR is not done. Similarly look into for some business transaction that prevent UD before Stock posting.
    [Thread - 1 |Re: User Profile created to block the UD, if RR is not done.]
    [Thread - 2|Re: Result recording mandatory before UD]
    [Thread - 3|Re: How to prevent UD when Result Recording is not carried out]
    Or the at the other hand you can do it smarter way also.
    Make the Posting proposal for UD code in Back ground in QS51 for each UD code. By doing this if the user will perform UD and save, system will; perform the Stock posting in background automatically.
    Reagrds,
    Shyamal

  • Part II post is not possible

    Dear Gurus,
    plz help me
    i have made GR with Part 1 post but iam not able to make Part2 post through Tr code J1IEX but the error is throughing  " Cenvat Amount is not Reserved".
    all tables updated except Part2 table is not updated.
    Plz suggest waiting for ur valuable solution.
    [email protected]
    Regards
    Ashok

    what are u doing? are you trying to reverse the part2?
    In J1IEX you select the post by drag down and in second coloumn select either vendor excise invoice or internal excise invioce and press enter.........
    Simulate the CENVET and post the document...........
    Sachin

  • Document year not updated at the time of part I Posting

    Dear Guys.,
                        At the time of part I posting  the document yaer not updated properly. this is not upodated in some times or some cases only . but it is updating correctly other times...
    but i dont know the reason why this document year was not updated.
    the field name and table tane is J_1iexchdr- DOCYR.
    Excise Transaction type is GRPO.
    because of this problem we can not able to do the invoice verification..
    REgards
    P.Anandhakumar.
    Edited by: Anandhakumar Palanisamy on Sep 3, 2009 8:47 AM

    Timing
    I am not sure what is going on behind the scenes with this web site in the past few days. One day I could not post in your thread at all. Another day
    I was receiving Inbox email notifications that were never posted in the Adobe Premiere Elements Forum or were posted several hours after I saw them
    in my Inbox email notifications. I was waiting for the problem to disappear on its own. If not, we can post in the Adobe Comments Forum to find out what
    might be going on.
    https://forums.adobe.com/community/general/forum_comments
    Yours has not been the only thread where I have had these problems.
    ATR

  • U201CRG23 Part II posting error

    Hello Gurus,
    1. My client is created one PO with 100 qty on dated 13/05/2010
    2. And he has done the 1st GR (101) with 50 qty on dated 13/05/2010 and posted pat1 and II, when I opened GR doc in MIGO in that excise invoice number 1481 and date is 23/03/2010. And Part II (500811601) posting dated 14.05.2010
    3. After that he has also done the 2nd GR (101) with remaining 50 qty on dated 27/05/2010 and posted part1and part II now in that excise invoice number is same (1481) but date is different 23/03/2010 and Part II posting (500811614) Dated 30/05/2010
    4. Then he has done cancellation 1st GR (102) with 50 qty on dated 27/05/2010. And he has done the some of Vendor down payment.
    Now all quantity is consumed and while doing MIRO for 2nd GR he is getting error u201CRG23 Part II posting yet not doneu201D u2013 Message no. 8I478
    Hence i m suggested to client do is cancel both GR and part II also and again do GR fresh for all the qty which you had received then capture & post part II in J1IEX then post MIRO it will allow to post and MM ( Qty) & FI ( value) will be match.But he is saying all material is consumed and not able to do for cancel the GR. 
    Kindly provide the solution pls..
    Regards
    Rahul

    Please follow the following procedure to avoid such kind of problems.
    1) Whenever u want to cancel the Excise Invoice Number whose Part 1 & 2 has been posted.first cancel the Material Document  so that u can reverse the PART 1 Entries.
    2)Then repost the excise invoice so that PART 2 entries also gets nullified.
    3) Then cancel the Excise invoice number so that its status becomes Cancelled from Posted.
    After following the above procedure u should do the reentry of capturing/posting the Excise invoice.
    If u have followed the step 1 & 2 ,but not the step 3 ,then the error comes in MIRO that RG23 PART2 posting not yet done.
    This is the very common problem in Excise posting as people normally dont follow the Step 3.
    Regards,
    Satpal Mujawar

  • I have tried to download an audiobook that has Two parts.  The second part of the book downloaded.  But the First point did not.  I keep getting "Part 1 could not download at this time".  How can I get it to download?

    I have tried to download an audiobook that contains Two Parts.  The second part was successful in downloading.  However, the first part was not.  I keep getting "Part 1 could not download at this time".  I should have enough space for the download.  Any suggestions of what I can do?

    Answered in the other thread you posted in:
    i am trying to download new software and my mac keeps asking for the administrator name and password... i enter my apple…
    Please don't post in more than one place. It can lead to people wasting their time answering a question which has already been answered elsewhere.

  • Parallel hint as part of index not working

    Hello,
    I think that I am misusing the parallel hint on this one, and would appreciate some guidance. I have an insert statement as such:
    INSERT INTO TABLE1
    SELECT column1, column2
    FROM table2;
    I modified the query so that it has a parallel:
    SELECT /*+ FULL(table2) PARALLEL(table2, 4) */
    column1, column2
    FROM table2;
    This parallel helps with the query's speed. However, when I use it with the insert statement on the top, it does not insert any record, nor does it give an error message:
    INSERT INTO TABLE1
    SELECT /*+ FULL(table2) PARALLEL(table2, 4) */
    column1, column2
    FROM table2;
    I put EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 'ALTER SESSION ENABLE PARALLEL DML'; at the beginning of the procedure, but that did not help.
    I really need the parallel to be in the SELECT statement, that statement runs for about 3 hours without a parallel (due to large amounts of data - no problems with query itself), however it returns only about 10,000 records, and I don't need to insert those with a parallel hint.
    Edited by: user577453 on Mar 17, 2009 12:25 PM -- Added last paragraph.

    user577453 wrote:
    I think that I am misusing the parallel hint on this one, and would appreciate some guidance. I have an insert statement as such:
    I put EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 'ALTER SESSION ENABLE PARALLEL DML'; at the beginning of the procedure, but that did not help.
    I really need the parallel to be in the SELECT statement, that statement runs for about 3 hours without a parallel (due to large amounts of data - no problems with query itself), however it returns only about 10,000 records, and I don't need to insert those with a parallel hint.First of all, your subject is probably supposed to be "Parallel hint as part of *insert* not working" rather than "Parallel hint as part of *index* not working", am I right?
    Can you show us the EXPLAIN PLAN output you get for your query and the one you get for your INSERT when using the parallel hints as posted?
    Please mention your database version (4-digits, e.g. 10.2.0.3).
    Please use DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY to format the EXPLAIN PLAN output if you're already on 9i or later, and please use the \ tag before and after the DISPLAY output to format it in fixed font for readability.
    What seems to be odd that you say that the result of the query seems to be different when using it as part of the INSERT statement? Are you sure that running the query standalone returns data whereas using exactly the same query in the INSERT statement inserts no records? This would be buggy behaviour.
    Regards,
    Randolf
    Oracle related stuff blog:
    http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/
    SQLTools++ for Oracle (Open source Oracle GUI for Windows):
    http://www.sqltools-plusplus.org:7676/
    http://sourceforge.net/projects/sqlt-pp/                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

  • Excise Part-2 is not getting updated during the MIGO

    Dear Experts,
    When I am doing GR (MIGO), I am selecting the Excise posting transaction in "Excise" header tab as "Capture & Post Excise Invoice".
    But, here after posting the GR, only Part-1 is getting updated. Part-2 is not updating. Moreover, if I try to post the same vendor excise invoice in J1IEX, it is giving the error as " Part-1 not yet posted even though Part-1 is updated. Can any body suggest what is the root cause for the same?
    One more thing is, once I select "Only Capture Excise Invoice" during GR, in the normal process Part-1 is updating and I'll be able to post the Part-2 in J1IEX. There is no issue. But, I can't be able to post the Part-2 during GR.
    Note: I am receiving the goods against with the STO. And, we are paying the customs against with the STO. After paying the Customs Invoice, we are receiving the goods into our manufacturing Plant from logical plant.
    Thanks in advance for your action!!!!
    Regards,
    Satya
    Dear

    Hi Ashok,
    I went through the above note. It explains the causes that why the posting is not happening in J1IEX.
    And, as per the solution that is in that note, if we change the status of that excise invoice from 'P' to Blank in the table J_1IEXCHDR, then Vendor excise invoice will be cancelling.
    So, I guess this can't resolve my issue. Because, my issue is if I select "Only Capture Excise", the Part-1 is updating in MIGO and I am able to post the Part-2 in J1IEX. But, If I select "Capture & Post Ecxise Invoice" in MIGO, then only Part-1 is updating and even I am not able to post the Part-2 in J1IEX also as the status of the Excise Invoice is "Posted".
    And, this is happening frequently during MIGO while selecting "Capture & Post Excise". So, I guess the Function Module / BADI which updates the J_1IPART2 is not getting triggered during MIGO. Once it triggers in MIGO, then Part-2 will be posting in GR itself.
    Could you please let me know the standard FM / BADI which updates the Excise Invoice Part-2 (J_1IPART2). So that I'll check with my ABAPer whether it is triggering or not during the MIGO.
    Thanks,
    Satya

Maybe you are looking for

  • Internal Software error PGC  for encore CS3 !!! solved  !!!

    Almost everybody here knows the next error: PGC "timeline name" has an error at xx:xx:xx:xy internal software error : %0, line timeline name - PGCINFO: name= timeline name, ref=BPGC, time=xx:xx:xx:xy Where the y in time stands for the length of the t

  • Asset Master: Time dependent

    <b>Hi. All</b> After I created the Asset master, after that , I going to click on Tab Time dependent then click on Further Interval. It’s always show me the date on 01.01.1900 in field Valid From. Could anyone explain to me why its shows like this an

  • Does anyone know how to achieve this in Photoshop? Any help is appreciated, thanks.

    Hello, I'm relatively new to Photoshop so if you know how to do this, please explain by telling me where I click. E.g. File>Open Does anyone know how I would achieve this exact effect in Photoshop in the image above (without the circular logo)? The 2

  • System to slow, slower than ubuntu can you help

    HI my system is too slow can you help, it takes to start any program about 20s, even ubuntu is faster. I tryed various X window managers[icewm,gnome,kde] it is still slow.

  • DOC SUR LA MIGRATION D'UNE BASE DE DONNEE ACCESS 2000 VERS ORACLE 9i

    TRES TRES URGENT JE PREPARE MON MEMOIRE ET C'EST LA PREMIERE FOIS QUE J UTILISE LE WORK BENCH MIGRATION D ORACLE J AIMERAI BIEN RECEVOIRE UNE DOCUMENTATION SUR LA CONFIGURATION D ORACLE MIGRATION WORKBENCH ET LES DIFFERENT ETAPES A RESPECTER POUR FAI