RG1 Register : opening & closing balance does not match with actual Stock
Hi
I am working on SAP AFS 6.0.
The RG1 register for a particular month displays data of only those materials which have been transacted in that month. I checked the tables J_1IRG1 and J_2IRG1BAL found that system retrives all records of the given period from the table J_1IRG1 and picks opening balance of these records from the table J_2IRG1BAL. The records of those materials which have closing balance in J_2IRG1BAL but was not transacted in the given period are not considered in RG1 register.
I want RG1 register to show opening balance of all materials which have closing balance in J_2IRG1BAL but have not been transacted in the subsequent periods.
Regards
Niraj
HI
Yes it is mandatory to update the table J_2IRG1BAL with material form and opening stock etc. for all the new materials
EXGRP: Excise group of the material
DATUM: Date from which you want RG1 report i.e. 01.01.2004
MATNR: Material
FORM: P for packed, L for loose. note that the same material cannot be maintained as both packed and loose.
WERKS: Leave it blank
Maintain all relevant opening balance fields. These fields start with OP
Note 951955 - CIN: General clarifications for RG1 goods*
check the above note
regards
Prashanth
Similar Messages
-
Receipt Qty in AP invoice does not match with actual receipt qty.
Hello everyone,
I am facing an issue in oracle Payables module. When we match invoice with receipt while preparing invoices, Quantity received shown in the Receipt quantity block in invoice window does not match with actual receipt quantity of that item. Due to this difference user is not able to book the invoice. Please help me to resolve this issue.
Thanks,
Himanshu GuptaExactly. What i mean is in the invoice window, There is a block called reciept quantity shown in the lower part. The received quantity displayed in that block is more the actual quantity being recieved. (when we see the recieving transactions). is this a bug?
thanks for your reply, awaiting your response......
Himanshu Gupta -
GR/IR account G/L balance does not match with BSIS table
Hi,
I am preparing a report which uses table BSIS.But the total in the table does not match with the GR/IR G/L balance account.When I click on balance item display in FS10N the entries match with that of BSIS but the total is different.Also how to factor the year opening balance entries in the report.
Thanks
ArunBut that will slow down the system considerabley, because BSEG contains a huge data
-
GL - Balances do not match with sum of Items
Hi,
I have a requirement in which I am pulling opening, closing balance and a list of all transactions (or items ) on a daily basis from GL to a flat file, and then loading in a third-party tool . Now, the issue is sum of all items (gl_je_lines ) should match with the diference of closing and opening balances.
I reconcilied the items with Oracle's Journal Report. Items are matching.
I also confirmed that closing balance of previous day matches with the opening balance of current date.
But, ( closing balance ) - (opening balance) does not match with sum(items)
I am using gl_daily _balances for opening and closing balance.
Waiting for your inputs/suggestions..
YoginiHi,
Thanks for the reply.
I am not using GL_INTERFACE. The tables I am using for Daily balances are:
gl_daily_balances
gl_code_combinations
chart_of_accounts
And for the items, I am using gl_je_lines, gl_je_headers.
Also, I am interested in Entered Amount in GBP as the Functional Currency is GBP and there are many transacitons in different foreign currencies.
More updates : I found that I have calculate the Entered Amount in GBP from all Converted/Transferred/Entered amounts in different currencies.
So, I tried the following :
(Select Sum(end_of_date_balance)
from gl_daily_balances
where Currency_code = 'GBP'
and currency_type = 'U'
and accounting_date = sysdate -1 --Opening balance
MINUS
( Select Sum(end_of_date_balance)
from gl_daily_balances
where Currency_code = 'GBP'
and currency_type = 'C'
and accounting_date = sysdate -1 --Opening balance
This way, I got opening and closing balance, but still the differernce between opening and closing balance is not matching with the sum of Items.
Any suggestions / inputs are highly appreciated.
Yogini -
Vendor aging unreconciled bal. does not match with TB Acct. Payable balance
Dear all,
When i take unreconciled vendor aging report with selection creteria all vendor codes selected,aging date as 31/03/09 and posting date from 01/04/08 to date 31/03/09,Interval - 30 Days,By Journal postings
Deticked all check boxes in it.
Aging report total balance of all vendor does not match with account payable balance in Trial balance ?
But for reconciled aging totals and trial balance total are same.
How to solve it ? or i need to do any settings ?
JeyakanthanHai!
What version of SAP B1 u r using.
I do got the same problem for my customer. I did this..
1. Run Aging Report for all Vendors. Donot check Recon Transaction.
2. Export to Excel
3. Run TB for BP selecting Vendors alone.
4. Export TB to Excel.
5. Find vendors who is having mismatch in their balance. (use V-Lookup in Excel)
6. Run Detail G/L Transaction report for those Vendors one by one.
*Selection from date: Age from date To date: Age To date *
*Selection Reconcilled Transaction only
7. Report Balance should be Zero. If not this problem is because of Internal Reconcillation.
8. Open *Check and Restore Previous reconcillation * select the vendor, internal
9. see the reconcillation details.
10. see the posting dates. All should be in previous fiscal year. (I mean the reconcilled set should have same fiscal year ex: Recon -2 trans should be in same fiscal year)
11. If, that is corrected and still difference exist means.
12.Go to Manage Previous Reconcillation
13. Select BP and Internal (Donot check system reconcill Trans)
14. Check the Reconcillation wheather all in same fiscal year.
Regards,
Thanga Raj.K
+91 9710445987 -
Business partner balance does not match journal entries message
Dear All,
The error message "Business partner balance does not match journal entries" appears in customer receivable report print preview. This is happened While generating the Customer Receivables Aging report by sales documents. What is the main cause ? How to resolve it ? Thanks a lot
Rgds,
EduHello,
I've got solution from SAP notes. From the notes, the problem is probably caused by :
1. Inconsistent Reconciliation
2. Unbalanced Reconciliation
3. Document is closed but the Document Journal Entry is Unreconciled
4. Business Partner Balance is Incorrect
5. Reconciling Part of Split Payment's Journal Entries
There aresome queries need to run in order to solve the problem. If you are not a partner, let me know your e-mail so that I could send.
Rgd, -
customer is on 2005 PL 43 and has come accross this error
this is what I found in your notes, but nothing shows when or if it has been fixed and on what PL.
Please let me know
Symptom
When creating a partial Payment based on a Journal Entry and an A/R Invoice and then running the Ageing Report by Sales Document, the following error message is displayed:
"Business Partner balance does not match journal entries".
NOTE !
The fix will apply to the following scenario:
When adding a BP with a Receivable account which is the same as the account defined in the G/L account determination window as Down Payment Receivables Account, and performing the above steps, the message will still be displayedHi,
Apart from the Note mentioned above, the reason why such message appears is that there is an inconsistent reconciliation being done in the system and earlier SAP provided with certain select queries to determine the inconsistencies. However, in the version 2007, when a database is upgraded from 2005 with such message all the inconsistent reconciliations are notionally opened and are displayed in the Inconsistent Audit Trail report under Utilities.
You can also check the following link
https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/B1/BPaccountBalancedoesnotmatchJournal+Entries
Regards,
Jitin
SAP Business One Forum Team -
KE24 and KKBC_HOE balance does not match....
Hi,
We are facing a big issues at the end of the perio 2 of 2009. Our KE24 and KKBC_HOE balance does not match. We have ccompared/hecked all our previous months balance and there it was matching accurately. But for period 2, there is a mismatch.
Could anybody pls suggest why there is a difference. Is it becuse that KE24 will show only the itmes which are settled and KKBC_HOC inclues both Settled and not settled items..
Pls help on this......hi
as you said check whether some transcation has happend but which are not settled. -
Final payment register does not match with Preliminary register and does
Final payment register -does not match with Preliminary payment reigster- it should have invoice number and PO Number whereas Preliminary payment register has INvoice but does not have a PO number .Cheques issue they would like to see -against which system generated PO only
Please see these docs/links.
R12: What replaces the 11i Preliminary Payment Register? [ID 750109.1]
What Happened To The Preliminary And Final Payment Register In R12? [ID 746339.1]
EBS File Comparison Report Now Available
https://blogs.oracle.com/stevenChan/entry/ebs_file_comparison_report_now
Thanks,
Hussein -
Report S_ALR_87011964 Asset balances does not match AW01N
In march 08, useful life of one asset is reduced to 4.4 years
effective Mar 08.
Accordingly - system has revised Plan Deprn figures from march 08 to
through Dec 08 & planned book value is nil as at Dec
08(These calculationa are perfect).
Then Deprn run was executed for first quarter of 2008(Calender Year).
For this asset, Deprn posted was 19007.41 (5001.95(Jan)+5001.95(Feb)
+9003.52(Mar) & this amount matches with GL as well as Asset values in
AS03(aw01n).
Now issue is when we run report s_alr_87011964(with Current book value)
as at report date 03/31/08(Mar 08) - it returns Acq value 300117.10 & Acc deprn
200078.06 & book value 100039.04(these values are as at 01/01/08) - hence it is not taking the Deprn
figures of year 2008 - however for all other assets - this report
displays perfect info & matches with GL & AW01N.
When we run this report with Report date 05/31/08(may 08) or later - it gives
correct value.
Kindly advise as to why Asset values does not match with Asset report for this particular asset.Hi
If you are executing the reports for previous / future years - execute them as of last day of the fiscal year
The execution for current year can have any date of the fiscal year for report execution
BR,Ajay M -
GL balances are not matching with Fixed assets ledger
Hi,
Please suggest me regarding this...
The issues is:when the legacy balances are uploaded in to sap there was the mistake.3 assets were entered twice(once in asset class 1250 & once in asset class 1300).It causes the GL balances are not matching with Fixed Asset balances(GL is less than FA).so now the client is asking to make manual entry by removing the recconcilation account settings and post manual entry then keep the reconcilation account as usual.They wanted to reverse the accumulated depreciation for the above 3 duplicated asssets for year 2007 & 2008.
How can i achieve the below:
1.GL balance was not equal (i.e lower) to FA ledger even at the time of go live(FI is lesser than FA)
2.For this i need to post one manual entry in FI-GL with the GO-LIVE date.is it possible? suggest me how to post?
3.After that i need to reverse the accumulated depreciation for the above 3 duplicated assets.how can i do this?
4.After that i need to remove the above 3 duplicated assets,how can i?
Please help me by giving your thoughts regarding this
Thanks
Sap GuruHi,
It is possible to post the adjustment entry from go live date provided you open the posting periods for the pervious year. (However this approach is not recommended for the following reasons - you have closed the books and must have published the results to local authorities. Adjustment now in the past year can cause some trouble from auditors etc. Secondly you are adjusting the GL balance for the last year, so you will have to complete the period end and year end closing for GL balances. So avoid kindly it)
For your problem - Go to transaction code OASV and post adjustment entry for the current period. Also check if your field status of assets contain field for shutdown of assets. If not change your field status accordingly. Once adjustment is done you shutdown the asset so that it does not post depreciation in future depreciation runs. (this will cater to your need of eliminating the assets. If you retire the asset then you will have to deal with gain or loss on retirement of an asset. If you can accommodate this entry, then you can use this figure in the final adjustment entry.)
Or Go to transaction code OAMK and set the recon account to post the adjustment entry.
Reversal of depreciation is not possible in SAP. So the only way to reverse the accumulated depreciation is by changing the recon account or using OASV, and passing adjustment entry.
regards
Thomas -
Hi ,
We have enabled context sensitive DFF in Bank Branch Page for HZ_PARTIES DFF , We have created Flex Map so that only bank branch context fields are only displayed in the bank branch page and as we know party information DFF is shared by supplier and Customer Page so we dint want to see any Bank Branch fields or context information in those pages.
We have achieved the requirement but when open existing branches bank branch update is throwing below error message :
"The value in flexfield context reference web bean does not match with the value in the context of the Descriptive flexfield web bean BranchDescFlex. If this in not intended, please go back to correct the data or contact your Systems Administrator for assistance."
this error is thrown only when we open existing branches, if we save existing branch and open then it is not throwing any error message.
Please let us know reason behind this error message.
Thanks,
MrudualaYou are kidding? It took me about 3 minutes to scroll down on my tab to get to the triplex button!
Habe you read the error message?
Quote:
java.sql.SQLSyntaxErrorException: ORA-04098: trigger 'PMS.PROJECT_SEQ' is invalid and failed re-validation
Check the trigger and it should work again.
Timo -
Accounts Payable Reconciliation Account does not match with sap report
Hello Folks,
I have problem with AP reconciliation account, that the balances in FS10N for a particular Company Code for particular reconciliation account balance do not match with the report run to show the vendor balances in local currency (report tcode F.98). Balance does not match for last posting period of the FY.
I have tried looking all the vendors in that particular GL recon account and ran the report, but still it i wast able to find out anything. May be Special GL transaction posting be there, but how to check that is there any spl gl transaction it there in the recon account.
I this to be solved by tonight, all the inputs will be very much appreciated and point will be assigned for sure.
Thanks you all.Hi,
In the report you have to G/L accounts where you can select on:
The reconsilation account form the Vendor
The G/L account where to posting is created on.
It is possible that there are differences when you have change the reconsilation account form the Vendor.
The old posting are on the old and new on the nwe account. Perhaps you mis some Special G/L Indicators
It is possible that values are changed when you run the reports
Paul -
Asset Balances Are Not Matching with General Ledger
HI,
After Doing asset year ending,balance carry forward,,,the Asset balances are not matching with the General ledger.what is the reason?
Kindly help me in this regard...it is very urgent.
Thanks
Sap GuruPlease run ABST2 for the relevant company code to reconcile FI and AA.
then check this out through ABST.
Regards
Velumani -
Recovery scenario - Voting disk does not match with the cluster guid
Hi all,
Think of you can not start your guest VMs just because it has a corrupted system.img root image. And assume it contains 5 physical disk( which are all created by the RAC template) hence ASM on them.
What is the simplest recovery scneario of the guest vms (RAC)?
Can it be a feasible scenario for recover of the availablity? (Assume both of the RAC system images are corrupted and we prefer not a system level recovery rather than backup / restore)
1. Create 2 RAC instances using the same networking and hostname details as the ones that are corrupted. - Use 5 different new disks.
2 Shutdown the newly created instances. Drop the disks from the newly created instances using VM manager.
3. Add the old disks whose system image is failing to be recoverd but ASM disks are still in use (from the newly created instances using VM manager.) to the newly created instances.
4. Open the newly created instances
Can we expect the ASM and CRS could be initialized and be opened without a problem?
When I try this scenario I get the folllowing error from the cssd/crsd .
- Cluster guid 9112ddc0824fefd5ff2b7f9f7be8f048 found in voting disk does not match with the cluster guid a3eec66a2854ff0bffe784260856f92a obtained from the GPnP profile.
- Found 0 configured voting files but 1 voting files are required, terminating to ensure data integrity.
What could be the simplest way of recovery of a virtual machine that has healthy ASM disks but corrupted system image?
Thank youHi,
you have a similar problem, when trying to clone databases with 11.2.
The problem is that a cluster is uniquely identified, and this information is hold in the OCR and the Voting disks. So exactly these 2 are not to be cloned.
To achieve what you want, simply setup your system in that way, that you have a separate diskgroup for OCR and Voting (and ASM spfile), which is not to be restored in this case of szeanrio.
Only all database files in ASM will then be exchanged later.
Then what you want can be achieved.
However I am not sure that the RAC templates have the option to install OCR and Voting into a separated diskgroup.
Regards
Sebastian
Maybe you are looking for
-
How do you HYPERLINK a web page address to an EXCEL document in Firefox like is possible in Explorer
How do you HYPERLINK a web page address to an EXCEL document in Firefox like is possible in Explorer?
-
Over technologies rather than RMI to pass remote objects
Hi, Just a general question about remote objects. Currently I am familiar with RMI, IIOP and JMS to pass remote objects. What other technologies are available? in particular, technologies for passing remote objects between different software systems?
-
Hi, While doing GR reversal for Inbound Delivery i am getting the error "MAINTAIN TOLERANCE LIMIT FOR KEY b1 for company code" We have maintained 50% as lower and upper limit. Can you all suggest..where to and how to maintain? Regards,
-
Putting iPhoto 08 photos in iPhoto 06
A friend gave me a large number of pictures on a DVD. I am trying to put some of them into iPhoto 6.0.6. Can I do this without upgrading to iPhoto 08? I am getting an error message when I try to bring iPhoto up: "You can't open your current photo lib
-
Screen lock on macbook pro, does it pause backups?
If screen lock takes place which backup running, does this mean backup is still running in the background, or does it stop and only resume when I unlock the laptop?