Ridiculous Connection Speeds

Hi All,
Following issues with line noise which have gone since removing the front plate from my OpenReach master socket and plugging directly in there, I now have an issue with really poor latency and speeds. I don't want to have to restart the HH3 as it's been up for over 3 days now (a record) which is strange as the HH3 shows uptime of 2days 4hrs - last IP change was 26/4 15:33.
Speedtest
IP Profile = 2Mb
Download Speed = 0.3Mb
Upload Speed = 0.12Mb
Latency = 432ms
ADSL Stats
Connection Information
Line state: Connected
Connection time: 2 days, 03:55:18
Downstream: 2.212 Mbps
Upstream: 1.094 Mbps
ADSL Settings
VPI/VCI: 0/38
Type: PPPoA
Modulation: G.992.5 Annex A
Latency type: Interleaved
Noise margin (Down/Up): 28.1 dB / 6.7 dB
Line attenuation (Down/Up): 31.1 dB / 18.3 dB
Output power (Down/Up): 17.9 dBm / 12.7 dBm
FEC Events (Down/Up): 0 / 0
CRC Events (Down/Up): 24 / 1268
Loss of Framing (Local/Remote): 0 / 0
Loss of Signal (Local/Remote): 0 / 0
Loss of Power (Local/Remote): 0 / 0
HEC Events (Down/Up): 4 / 7450
Error Seconds (Local/Remote): 63 / 22872
Do the line stats make any sense? Could this be a HH3 issue? Am I just expecting too much?
Can anybody point me in a direction that will help me solve this as this has been a rather black comedy since the install on 4/4 - especially as I have to pay for this.
Cheers,
Ian

Hi klinkenhoff,
Your IP Profile would be about 2mbps as it's 88.2% of your current connection speed which was 2.212 Mbps from your last set of adsl stats.
Your throughput speed is the speed you experience when using the Internet and is also the speed which speed test websites use.
Your throughput speed will be slightly slower than your IP Profile and can be effected by how you connect to your router/home hub such as Wifi or Ethernet and also network traffic and congestion.
So:
1) Your connection speed is the speed which your homehub/router and the local exchange is connected at.
2) Your IP Profile is a speed limit applied to your broadband service by the local exchange. Its purpose is to ensure the exchange doesn't 'overload' your broadband service by sending more data down your phone line than it (or your BT Home Hub, router or modem) can physically handle. 
As your on ADSL2+ your IP Profile will always be 88.2% of your connection speed.
3) Your throughput speed is the speed you experience when using the Internet and is also the speed which speed test websites show, it can be effected by how you connect to your router/home hub such as Wifi or Ethernet and also network traffic and congestion
Hope that makes sense.
Cheers
I'm no expert, so please correct me if I'm wrong

Similar Messages

  • EA2700 download speed - local port connection speed

    Hi,
    I've recently upgraded my ISP connection to 200Mbs dl and 20Mbs upload.
    Using a test (speedtest.net) to determine my connection speed i discovered that the downloadspeed only reached about 75 Mbs , but with the modem directly attached to the computer it reaches almost 190 Mbs , so the problem must be with the EA2700 router.
    I've tried everything , upgrading firmware , downgrading firmware , changing the MTU , dissabling IPv6 etc.
    I have narrowed the problem down to this: After starting my computer (from the off power) the downloadspeed is 75Mbs (although the status within the routers webinterface says i have both on WLAN and localport 1Gb).
    After restarting the router (by the routers webinterface) the speed is 180Mbs.
    Seems like i have to start the computer first and then switch on the router (ridiculous i know) , seems like although the portspeed indicates 1Gb i only have a 100 Mb port speed....
    Any ideas? or is this just a crappy router?

    I suspect that this is a basic internal issue in the router.
    I'm a retired networking system administrator and am not unfamiliar with devices that don't work the way the sales force claims -- especially at the upper limits of those claims.
    I have only been playing with the EA2700 now for a few days, but am absolutely astounded at how "un-professional" all of the documentation and support information for the device is.
    I say "un-professional" meaning -- seriously consumer oriented. No technical specifics. Granted I'm familiar with the "classic interface" on Linksys products and am not particularly enamored of this new web based environment. But that's just my history.
    At any rate. I'm fairly certain that you need to try to reach "tier 2" (or maybe higher) tech support on the phone to find out what the actual throughput capabilities of the hardware and software are.
    200Mbs is a "new" speed common to FIOS, but not to Cable. The end result being that the probability that new-product testing at that speed is at best, incomplete. And, I suspect it has not been done at all.
    While the "chips" may be capable of running at Gig-a-bit speeds, a router's speed is controlled by the internal "routing speed" of the software.
    Before I retired, I used to confont this kind of issue routinely in working with Internet2 -- the hardware available "claimed" to be able to do the job, but the on-the-job evaluations proved that it was not capable. But we had to spend a lot of time developing tests to refute manufacturer's (marketing) claims.
    It may be the simple fact that the EA2700 (as best I can tell) is now very long in the tooth -- apparently introduced back in April of 2012 -- 3 years ago - an eternity in Networking. That coupled with the fact that the EA2700 is the "entry level" device in Linksys' EA product line.
    An interesting review (Review Date April 30, 2012) in PC Magazine: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2403745,00.asp primarily discusses the WiFi side of the router. It hedges its bets on the hardware by saying "We will revisit this router when that software becomes available. Perhaps then the true value of the EA2700 will shine though." (I haven't found that review yet.)

  • Connection Speed reading for external USB Modem ????

    In previous versions of the Mac OS, I've been able to see a readout of my connection speed achieved with a dial-up modem and telephone line (e.g. 28 kbps, 33 kbps, 50 kbps etc etc) but under this latest 10.5 Version of OS X I can't see this speed in the networking software that controls my Apple USB modem.
    Has this feature been dropped with 10.5 ?
    If not, how do I see the speed. It would be very helpful to see it as I sometimes travel to some pretty remote areas where phone lines are poor - so if you know the actual connect speed you have a good idea of what sort of size of downloads to attempt and not to attempt while on-line.
    I can see such parameters as my time connected and IP address assigned by the ISP, but no connect speed.

    I realize the speed that used to be shown was the initial speed the two modems involved, mine and the ISP's, negotiated to establish the connection and I also realize that is not the actual download speed.
    But it's still helpful to know that initial speed because it is a rough indicator of line quality ands gives one an idea of how rapidly he will be able to communicate - clearly there will be a significant difference for the better in performance for the online session if one can achieve a connect speed of, say 50k, as opposewd to 28k or less on a poorer line.

  • Issues with Infinity - Connection Speed & Other Pr...

    Hi all,
    I had Infinity installed on 2nd November.  Besides some issues with BT mixing up delivery addresses the installation by Kelly Comms went smoothly, and was setup within 45 mins.
    Initial speeds were very good, achieving 74Mb/s Down & 18Mb/s Up with a Ping/Latency of 5ms  Excellent really considering the sub 5Mb/s I was used to with ADSL.  The high connection speeds remained over the weekend until about 4pm on November 5th.  I found that the Openreach Modem had lost connection (flashing DSL light) and my HH3 Broadband light was a steady orange.  I left this for a while before picking up my landline to call customer services only to find that my line was dead with no dial tone.
    Broadband eventually came back on service later that afternoon, but at a much lower speed of 43Mb/s Down, and an almost impossibly slow 0.97Mb/s Up.  Ping/Latency has also slowed to around 20ms.  During the evening I managed to get through to customer services in India, who were able to start dealing with the fault on my phone line. 
    Initially I was told it would be the 12th of November that the problem with the phone line would be resolved.  Fortunately enough it was then fixed the following morning by an apparent engineer visit.  I was unaware of this action until later in the day, but had noticed before leaving for work that Broadband was yet again down.
    So to cut a long story short: I have a phone line that works, but a big reduction in connectivity speed especially upstream speed.  Should I be contacting BT to investigate yet another potential problem bearing in mind that I am still within the supposed '10 day training' window.
    (All speed tests have been conducted via a PC connected by ethernet directly to the HH3)
    If anyone can advise me it would be much appreciated.

    Hi Tidycarrot,
    Welcome to the Forum. What was the speed estimate given to you when you signed up to the service? If the speeds you are see are well below that estimate, send me in your details using the link below and I'll run a few test on you line from here.
    http://bt.custhelp.com/app/contact_email/c/4951
    Thanks
    Paddy
    BTCare Community Mod
    If we have asked you to email us with your details, please make sure you are logged in to the forum, otherwise you will not be able to see our ‘Contact Us’ link within our profiles.
    We are sorry but we are unable to deal with service/account queries via the private message(PM) function so please don't PM your account info, we need to deal with this via our email account :-)

  • Problems with the Fios 20/5 connection speed in my area dropping down to less than 3mbs.

    I have written out a flyer that I plan to go door to door with. Since I am under contract with Verizon, I am forced to honor my side of the contract. Even if they are allowed to make me pay for a service that I am not completely getting. I am very displeased and as soon as my contract is up, I will change back to My local cable companies all in one that does not require a contract and has no issue such as the one I am having.
    Do you have Verizon Fios Internet?
    Are you on the 20/5 connection?
    If so, you may not be getting the speed you are paying for. I am on a 20/5 connection and when my computer is on for longer than an hour the internet download speed with Verizon Fios starts to slow down until it is below 3mbs. It takes about 24 hours to get down to 3mbs but only about an hour or two to get down to about 6-7mbs when I am paying for 20mbs…
    I have 3 computers in my home that have Windows Vista, Windows XP home edition and Windows Media Edition 2005. All of the computers run into this same exact issue, I have tried every setting I could think of with my 24 years of computer technical experience. I finally took one machine with Windows XP and ran a full format on the hard drive and reinstalled a fresh Windows Xp Operating system onto the hard drive so it is a bare bones OS. This way there is no other software on the machine that could possibly be causing the problem and found that when I connected online through Verizon Fios the machine still ran into the same exact issue. This proves to me that the issue is not on any of my machines.
    Now all of this time my buddy that lives 1.2 miles away from my house has been having the same issue with three computers at his home also. He has Windows Vista on two machines and Windows XP Pro on one.
    When I concluded that it was a Verizon Fios issue, after a few months of trying to get by, researching, diagnosing and losing much information in order to verify it was on Verizon’s side, I contacted technical support at Verizon’s online website. The agent and I went through the regular procedure that anyone would have to go through and I patiently explained what I had done to try to diagnose the issue. The agent came to the conclusion that he could not figure out the problem so he guessed that the Verizon router/modem may be the issue and told me he would send me a new one by mail.
    I received the new Verizon router/modem, installed it and had to call to have it activated. Afterward it still had the same exact issue as the prior router/modem. So now we know it’s not my computers, it’s not the router/modem. My Verizon router/modem is connected right at the Optical Network Terminal (ONT), which is the box that connects the fiber-optics to your home, usually just inside or outside your garage wall. Mine is just outside…
    From here my buddy, who has been having this problem also the entire time, called the local office of Verizon Fios and an installer was setup to come over to his home and trouble shoot the issue. My buddy called me and told me when the installer was headed to his home and I met him at his home to see what the installer found and in hope that my issue would be fixed at the same time. The installer went through the system at his house and was frustrated about not finding the reason for the issue and ready to leave without fixing anything. I simply asked that he stay long enough to see the issue present itself within an hour-hour and a half.
    His laptop itself already showed the speed drop from 20mbs to between 16-17mbs, it was on its way down. He basically told us something that online tech support already stated to me, it is extremely difficult to prove it is on Verizon’s side. In other words it is extremely difficult to prove it, in a way that will convince Verizon to check its own servers, routers and software updates to their own systems. The installer, good guy, couldn’t/wouldn’t stay but we did convince him not to simply drop the issue. He called shop and they sent another installer out to take over the issue.
    The new installer, great guy, got up to speed on what was already done at my buddies home. The first installer, checked and replaced the Verizon router/modem, checked the wiring and splitters. Basically went through the entire system up to the Optical Network Terminal (ONT), the box that connects the fiber-optics to your home. He pulled and replaced the Optical Network Terminal (ONT), thinking that perhaps the unit was compromised. While he was doing this job a tech was called and asked to stop by for assistance with the issue. The tech checked the computers inside and tried to do some settings that the main office informed him to try. I explained to the tech that the same issue was happening at my house, that I went through every setting I could think of and find online to help alleviate the issue. After some shop talk about what I had tried, including the full format and reinstall of the operating system on one of my machines, he just as I came to the conclusion that it couldn’t be with the computers and since everything that had to do with the Verizon Fios system from the street to the end-user computer had been checked, verified and/or replaced, the issue had to be coming from Verizon’s main office.
    The installer had already checked the main at the road that has the 3x2 green service cover on it by the side walk. Everything was in good working order. The tech called the main office to see if my buddy and I were on the same hub, basically a big splitter that continues the service from the main office to the homes, we were not. So that was ruled out…
    My understanding of the system ends there. The only other components I know of are the Main branch’s routers, servers and software.
    Verizon had a new connection speed added to their system, 25/15 about the same time our issue began. So I am guessing that when they updated the system to include this new connection speed they corrupted the software for the 20/5 connection.
    We have been waiting to hear from the tech that was at my buddy’s house, to see if the issue will be dealt with. My buddy has called him a couple of times and he has mentioned that he is trying to get it addressed and to call back if we hadn’t heard from him. He remembered who he and I were and what the issue was, so I believe he is taking it seriously. How far he can move the issue is beyond me…
    I want to add that my buddy and I have been customers with the all in one package from Verizon Fios since their services have moved into our area, about a year and a half… It has only been since about June that this issue has presented itself, before then we were on 7th heaven with the speeds. We couldn’t have been more than happy with the services.
    This issue has caused that to all go afoul, not only do the speeds get down to less than 3mbs but the speed is not smooth at all. Rather the 3mbs speed is stop and go, freezing in between at times, very choppy. Barely usable at times, unless you restart the computers and start over.
    We are hoping that anyone with Verizon Fios Internet Services will keep an eye on their speeds by going to http://speedtest.net and doing tests to verify they are getting the speeds they are paying Verizon for.
    This is what it will take for Verizon to take this issue seriously is to gather everyone on the system that may be having the same issue. I believe it is everyone that is within the 1.2 miles from my house to my buddy’s and will distribute flyers to each and every house in between.
    If you find that your speed is not as fast as it should be please contact me and I will add you to the list, this way we can see exactly how far this problem covers and perhaps it will also help to show a pattern and understanding as to why the issue is present in the first place.
    My contact information,
    I have left this out here, you can contact me on these forums...

    Actually what this came down to was an issue between Windows Vista and an Ethernet Card on one of the machines in each of our local networks.
    Even though our two machines are 6 years apart, we both have the same ethernet adapter on our main desktops. A RealTek RTL8139/810x Family Fast Ethernet Nic. It seems that the adapter does not work at the 20mbs download speeds with Vista. For some reason the adapter does not shut down when the computer does? I don't understand why but it doesn't, it keeps the connection alive. I removed the ethernet cable and pulled the power cable and had my two other computers still connected to the network and found that the issue was resolved. The way I found out was that I used the connections on my main computer to hook up one I had laying around and through further testing found the problem no longer existed...
    Then I realized that my buddy and I installed Windows Vista at about the same time, a couple of months ago. Funny how you can forget an important detail like that. Then I remembered that he had the same identical ethernet adapter as I did, I had noticed that while trouble shooting his computer at his home but didn't think it was important at the time. Until the issue was narrowed down to the adapter, then it all seemed to all fall into line.
    Quite humbling... In the end, anyone who has Windows Vista and this NIC probably will have problems with the 20mbs download speed of the computers on their own networks. I tried the latest Vista driver from RealTek and also tried to roll back the driver, with no success....
    Back at the beginning when we first had fios installed in our homes there wasn't an issue when we had the 10/2 speeds and had Vista. Then we decided to change from Vista to XP because we both were having issues as to what programs you could use and which you could not, shortly after having fios installed. Then when verizon upgraded us to 20/5 we were amazed at the speed and still had no issue because we had XP on our main computers with the RealTek adapters...
    We reinstalled Vista because it seemed like we were having more issues with XP by getting hit with Antivirus2008 and its variants and thought it time for a change back...
    It didn't really hit us that Vista could be the culprit because we both have a laptop in our networks that have had Vista on them from the get go when there were no issues... We also didn't notice just how bad it was right away and over time kind of left the Vista install out of the equation.
    Just strange that one computer can effect all the other computers on the network, even when it is shut down...
    I allowed the other two computers to run 24hours and the issue did not present itself, when I added the main computer with the RealTek adapter back to the mix it reappeared. The Realtek adapter is the only real common denominator between his machine and mine.
    So now we have three choices,
    We can go back to Windows XP.
    We can buy a new NIC or a wireless card to replace the RealTek...
    Hopefully this post will help anyone else who runs into this problem, it has been very frustrating to say the least...
    Thanks to everyone for their help and I apologize for complaining about verizon when it was not a verizon issue. I came to the conclusion that the only part verizon really played was upgrading us to a 20/5 tier which I am thankful for...
    Would be nice if this card was on a list that Verizon support could use to troubleshoot , diagnose or eliminate for future support issues.
    Message Edited by keiser0619 on 08-06-2009 03:58 PM

  • Slow Internet Connection Speeds caused by Ethernet Controller Driver

    Problem:  Internet connection speeds are 1/10 of available connection speed.
    1. Problem statement is based on running speed tests at cnet, speedtest.net, and AT&T.
    2. I am paying for 12 MBps down load speed but I only get about 1.5 MBps.
    3. Other computers in household get 11+ MBps connected to the same ethernet cable and also different ethernet cables.
    4. I traced the problem to the network controller driver.
    5. I updated to the latest driver with no change in performance.
    6. After some experimenting I found that if I re-install the driver after the computer is booted up, the internet connection down load speeds increase to 11+ MBpS (typically around 11.4 with maximum capability of 12)
    I have assumed that the driver does not load properly the first time, but why?  Or is there some other cause or setting that I have overlooked?
    Board: MSI Z77A-G43
    Bios: Version 2.0
    Ethernet Controller:  RealTek RTL8168B PCIe GBE Family Controller
    Ethernet Controller Driver:  7.65.1025.2012
    VGA:   NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
    PSU:   Raidmax RX630Z 630W
    Intel Core i7-2700K Sandy Bridge 3.5GHz LGA 1155 95W
    MEM: 4x4gb
    HDD (Primary): Western Digital  WD5000HHTZ-04N21V0 500MB
    HDD (Secondary): Hitachi Deskstar HDS723020BLA642 2TB
    OS: Windows 7 64bit Professional

    Have you installed all of the most recent drivers:
    http://www.msi.com/product/mb/Z77A-G43.html#/?div=Driver&os=Win7%2064
    There is also an realtek firmware update included in the latest bios:
    >>Beta BIOSes<<
    2.8 is the latest official & there are two newer beta bios's there as well.

  • My Lacie Big Extreme Hard drive does not show connection speed

    *My Concern*
    Hi I have a Lacie Big Extreme Hard drive, which although works fine is not showing its connection, shows up in the system profiler as 'Connection Speed Unknown'. -Should I be worried? I have other drives connected to my G5 Dual 2 gig machine and no problem their they all show their connection speeds.
    *Other Firewire 'Unknown Speed connection' related Problem*
    I had a DVD LaCie Dual layer portable Firewire drive which recently suffered from the same problem and I had to send it back. This was due to it slowly developing a fault of not being able to burn dual layer disks properly.
    *What I have done to try and remedy the situation.*
    I have been able to do the following but I am afraid with no change in the system Profiler;-
    1 Trashed the whole system and rebuild
    2 repair my permissions
    3 empty out all my caches with OnyX (third party app) version 1.8.5
    4 Disconnected all drives and reconnected them one by one to see if there are any anomalies within the system
    5 switched my G5 off removed the plug from the wall waited 30 sec for it to reset itself this was the 1st attempt. On my 2nd attempt I then cold booted the machine and reset Pram settings
    6 used Tech Tools Pro 4 version 4.1.2
    7. Replaced Power supply of the offending unit (didn't have to but I wanted to be safe and eliminate this fronm the equation.
    9.tried changing around the order in the chain to which the drives were connected to the G5but alas no joy!
    Summery
    So my concern is if a device which is Firewire shows up in the system profiler as connection speed unknown should I begin to worry even though it appears to be functioning.
    Thank you ahead of time for any help on this matter
    *Supporting evidence*
    Please see below a shot of my System profiler so you can see what I mean:-
    *(Important Note)*
    The Lacie Big disk has 800/400 Firewire connection speeds I have connected it straight to my G5s firewire 800 port then daisy chained the LaCie's via its other 800 port to the two other 800 Firewire Hard drives.
    When the LaCie DVD DL drive was connected, I connected it straight to the 400 firewire port. As it needed direct access to the G5 for it to function optimally.
    *System Profiler Info under OSX Tiger 10.4.11*
    FireWire Bus:
    Maximum Speed: Up to 800 Mb/sec
    LaCie d2 Extreme LUN 0:
    Manufacturer: LaCie Group SA
    Model: 0x0
    GUID: 0xD04B710B061FB5
    Maximum Speed: Up to 800 Mb/sec
    Connection Speed: Up to 400 Mb/sec
    Sub-units:
    LaCie d2 Extreme LUN 0 Unit:
    Unit Software Version: 0x10483
    Unit Spec ID: 0x609E
    Firmware Revision: 0x102
    Product Revision Level: P22O
    Sub-units:
    LaCie d2 Extreme LUN 0 SBP-LUN:
    Capacity: 153.38 GB
    Removable Media: Yes
    BSD Name: disk2
    OS9 Drivers: Yes
    S.M.A.R.T. status: Not Supported
    Volumes:
    disk2s6:
    Capacity: 153.38 GB
    Available: 102.21 GB
    Writable: Yes
    File System: HFS+
    d2 quadra (button):
    Manufacturer: LaCie
    Model: 0x4136
    GUID: 0xD04B840A07A9A5
    Maximum Speed: Up to 800 Mb/sec
    Connection Speed: Up to 400 Mb/sec
    Sub-units:
    d2 quadra (button) Unit:
    Unit Software Version: 0x484944
    Unit Spec ID: 0xD04B
    d2 quadra Unit:
    Unit Software Version: 0x10483
    Unit Spec ID: 0x609E
    Firmware Revision: 0x110
    Product Revision Level:
    Sub-units:
    d2 quadra SBP-LUN:
    Capacity: 465.76 GB
    Removable Media: Yes
    BSD Name: disk4
    OS9 Drivers: No
    S.M.A.R.T. status: Not Supported
    Volumes:
    disk4s3:
    Capacity: 465.64 GB
    Available: 250.79 GB
    Writable: Yes
    File System: Journaled HFS+
    LaCie Big Disk Extreme LUN 0:
    Manufacturer: LaCie Group SA
    Model: 0x0
    GUID: 0xD04B741A058BFC
    Maximum Speed: Up to 800 Mb/sec
    *Connection Speed: Unknown --------------------------**{this is where my concern lies}*
    Sub-units:
    LaCie Big Disk Extreme LUN 0 Unit:
    Unit Software Version: 0x10483
    Unit Spec ID: 0x609E
    Firmware Revision: 0x102
    Product Revision Level: 912
    Sub-units:
    LaCie Big Disk Extreme LUN 0 SBP-LUN:
    Capacity: 931.52 GB
    Removable Media: Yes
    BSD Name: disk3
    OS9 Drivers: Yes
    S.M.A.R.T. status: Not Supported
    Volumes:
    disk3s6:
    Capacity: 931.52 GB
    Available: 181.67 GB
    Writable: Yes
    File System: HFS+

    Hi BDAqua - thanks a lot for replying - really appreciate your help. I was using Time machine to back up on the old lacie drives that I have - I just backed up on both lacies and they backed up faster for some reason but that might have been because they were very small back ups as I did full back ups on Tuesday night - this is the info under the USB section > hardware > about my mac - it didn't show the speed like the example you gave me though but it still backed none the less  :
    USB Bus:
      Host Controller Location: Built In USB
      Host Controller Driver: AppleUSBOHCI
      PCI Device ID: 0x0035
      PCI Revision ID: 0x0043
      PCI Vendor ID: 0x1033
      Bus Number: 0x15
    Bluetooth USB Host Controller:
      Product ID: 0x8207
      Vendor ID: 0x05ac  (Apple Inc.)
      Version: 19.65
      Speed: Up to 12 Mb/sec
      Manufacturer: Apple Inc.
      Location ID: 0x15200000
      Current Available (mA): 500
    Current Required (mA): 0
    I also got a reply back from WD on the hard drive and they said the following - exactly the same as you about it being a problem with the power supplied hence why the disk won't mount - so you were spot on - so I'm thinking I should go ahead and get the newertech 7 USB port 4 amps as you suggested - let me know what you think and then I'll just order it - and thank you - really do appreciate your help on this - thanks Jayas
    Dear Jayas
    Thank you for contacting Western Digital Customer Service and Support. My name is James.
    If the drive is working fine on one system but failing on another especially with the "clicking" sound this is an issue with the system not being able to supply enough power to power the device.
    These devices require power from the machine to make them operate if there isn't enough power supplied the drive will fail to work. This is why you are having no issues with one system but are on another.

  • Connection speed high but pages have been loading slowly for last 4 days.

    My Broadband has performed well for the last two years but 4 days ago web pages have suddenly begun to take ages to load (10 to 15 seconds or more).
    Checking my connection speed gives, typically, 7816 kbits downloaded in 1.542 sec.
    The problem persists with Safari, Internet Express, Camino and Firefox.
    Another problem cropped up at the same time in that a web site I use regularly suddenly became unavailable to me - but still OK for others. This also applied to Google UK until yesterday but now that is back.
    Can anyone help?
    Regards
    Chris

    Look at these links
    Mac Tune-up: 34 Software Speedups
    http://www.macworld.com/article/49489/2006/02/softwarespeed.html
    52 Ways to Speed Up OS X
    http://www.imafish.co.uk/articles/post/articles/130/52-ways-to-speed-up-os-x/
    Tuning Mac OS X Performance
    http://www.thexlab.com/faqs/performance.html
    11 Ways to Optimize Your Mac's Performance
    http://lowendmac.com/eubanks/07/0312.html
    The Top 7 Free Utilities To Maintain A Mac.
    http://mac360.com/index.php/mac360/comments/thetop_7_free_utilities_to_maintain_amac/
    Mac OS X: System maintenance
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=607640
     Cheers, Tom

  • IWeb publishing to .Mac/iDisk- interruptions: does connection speed matter?

    Greetings,
    I posted an earlier message somewhere in the iWeb08 forum regarding my suddenly experiencing lack of completion of publishing iWeb site to .Mac. Publishing just stops - no error message comes up. I have however noticed that my internet connection has been also varying in speed - down to a few dozen kbps in the last day, which is when I started experiencing this problem. Does connection speed affect such publishing? in other words, if connection speed goes down tremendously, does publishing to .Mac sort os "times out"???
    Will appreciate input!
    - Roger T

    More than likely you are seeing a cached copy of your website. Sometimes this is a local phenomenon and a simple clearing of your browser cache does the trick (Safari>Empty Cache). However sometimes your ISP is the culprit with caching at their level. This seems to be a chronic problem with ISPs in the UK for some reason. And the only thing you can do is to wait it out.
    You can try adding a "?" to the end of your URL to force Safari to fetch a non-locally-cached copy of your site, but even this won't help if your ISP is overzealously caching material.
    Anyone in the UK can shed light on this ISP phenomenon???
    If you find this information useful, please don't forget to provide me with feedback by marking my reply as "solved" or "helpful" using those little buttons that you see in the title bar of this reply. I really appreciate it!

  • Minimum Connection Speed & A few other Questions.

    Living in rural Vermont this is of concern, is there a minimum connection speed for the CC versions?
    If one has no internet access during the 23-33rd days but returns on day 35 what happens?
    Can the check-in occur on Day 21 instead?
    Finally, I saw mention made of CS7 and CS8. Are these in the planning stage? If the CC versions are simply a conveince for those who want this service and the regular updates are coming I would be very much happier.
    Thanks!

    Hi there,
    There is no minimum connect speed requirement for the Creative Cloud membership or using CC products.
    The two things for which you would need an Internet connection are -
    1. downloading the creative cloud products that you would like to install & use
    2. licensing & activating the products by signing in with your CC membership ID
    for #1, Adobe has implemented a lot of improvements to be able to resume downloads of CC products post a network failure or outage.
    for #2, a minimal Internet bandwidth is required
    So, as long as your connection allows you to accomplish the above, you are all good.
    >> If one has no internet access during the 23-33rd days but returns on day 35 what happens? Can the check-in occur on Day 21 instead?
    If your CC membership is active, you will be able to resume working on the software after hitting 'Try Again' in the 'Renew your subscription' prompt that you will see in the software on the 35th day. We are working on certain enhancements that will provide flexibility vs. the monthly subscription check-ins.
    >> Finally, I saw mention made of CS7 and CS8. Are these in the planning stage? If the CC versions are simply a conveince for those who want this service and the regular updates are coming I would be very much happier.
    Please refer the letter from the Creative Cloud team for details - http://www.adobe.com/cc/letter.html
    Thanks,
    Charat

  • Very low connection speed.

    Hi, I've waited the 10 days since I first got BT Broadband and I wondered about the slow speed I am getting. The speed test says my line is rated for 8mbit (8000kbit) but I only get up to 900kbit connection speed, it was around 600-700kbit for a while but now seems to have settled at 900~kbit. When I ordered the package the line check said I can get between 8 and 15megabit but should expect 8.5.
    Is there a fault on the line? The online speed checker thing (which seems to have been replaced or I just can't find it anymore) said I should report a fault and that on my line I should be connecting at more like 6000kbit-7000kbit.
    This is what my router says in the advanced connection page:
    ADSL Line Status
    Connection information
    Line state:
    Connected
    Connection time:
    2 days, 13:50:05
    Downstream:
    947 Kbps
    Upstream:
    551 Kbps
      ADSL settings
    VPI/VCI:
    0/38
    Type:
    PPPoA
    Modulation:
    G.992.3 Annex A
    Latency type:
    Fast
    Noise margin (Down/Up):
    4.1 dB / 5.8 dB
    Line attenuation (Down/Up):
    75.0 dB / 41.7 dB
    Output power (Down/Up):
    0.0 dBm / 12.7 dBm
    FEC Events (Down/Up):
    0 / 0
    CRC Events (Down/Up):
    3690 / 1011
    Loss of Framing (Local/Remote):
    0 / 0
    Loss of Signal (Local/Remote):
    0 / 0
    Loss of Power (Local/Remote):
    0 / 0
    Loss of Link (Remote):
    0
    HEC Errors (Down/Up):
    2810 / 467
    Error Seconds (Local/Remote):
    0 / 729

    Here's the results of the download test thingy:
    This Test comprises of Best Effort Test: -provides background information.
    Download  Speed
    763 Kbps
    0 Kbps
    7150 Kbps
    Max Achievable Speed
     Download speedachieved during the test was - 763 Kbps
     For your connection, the acceptable range of speeds is 2000-7150 Kbps.
     IP Profile for your line is - 8000 Kbps
    This test was not conclusive and further testing is required.This might be useful for your ISP to investigate the fault.
    Note: An Upstream test was not conducted on this line due to a technical issue. If your concern is related to upstream performance then please retry
    the performance test again in 1 hours time.

  • WPA-TKIP WPA2-AES Connection speed

    Hi,
    My customer uses controller based wireless network. There is a connection speed problem between two SSID's. First SSID uses WPA(TKIP+AES) and WPA2(TKIP+AES) encryption method and dot1x authentication method. Second SSID uses open authentication (this is a guest SSID)
    802.11 a/n/ac is enable on WLC and client can connect with these methods. But clients connect to the first SSID with 802.11 b/g (54 Mbps) and connect to the second SSID with 802.11 a/n/ac. Customer wants to know why our clients connect with low speed to first SSID even if a/n/ac is enable.
    Sometimes WPA-TKIP encryption methods can reduce the connection speed. Do you have any idea about that and official document about this problem?
    Thanks,
    Burhan,

    TKIP and AES are two different types of encryption that can be used by a Wi-Fi network. TKIP stands for “Temporal Key Integrity Protocol.” It was a stopgap encryption protocol introduced with WPA to replace the very-insecure WEP encryption at the time. TKIP is actually quite similar to WEP encryption. TKIP is no longer considered secure, and is now deprecated. In other words, you shouldn’t be using it.
    AES stands for “Advanced Encryption Standard.” This was a more secure encryption protocol introduced with WPA2, which replaced the interim WPA standard. AES isn’t some creaky standard developed specifically for Wi-Fi networks; it’s a serious worldwide encryption standard that’s even been adopted by the US government. For example, when you encrypt a hard drive with TrueCrypt, it can use AES encryption for that. AES is generally considered quite secure, and the main weaknesses would be brute-force attacks (prevented by using a strong passphrase) and security weaknesses in other aspects of WPA2.
    The “PSK” in both names stands for “pre-shared key” — the pre-shared key is generally your encryption passphrase. This distinguishes it from WPA-Enterprise, which uses a RADIUS server to hand out unique keys on larger corporate or government Wi-Fi networks.
    In summary, TKIP is an older encryption standard used by the old WPA standard. AES is a newer Wi-Fi encryption solution used by the new-and-secure WPA2 standard. In theory, that’s the end of it. But, depending on your router, just choosing WPA2 may not be good enough.
    While WPA2 is supposed to use AES for optimal security, it also has the option to use TKIP for backward compatibility with legacy devices. In such a state, devices that support WPA2 will connect with WPA2 and devices that support WPA will connect with WPA. So “WPA2″ doesn’t always mean WPA2-AES. However, on devices without a visible “TKIP” or “AES” option, WPA2 is generally synonymous with WPA2-AES.
    WPA and TKIP compatability options can also slow your Wi-Fi network down. Many modern Wi-Fi routers that support 802.11n and newer, faster standards will slow down to 54mbps if you enable WPA or TKIP in their options. They do this to ensure they’re compatible with these older devices.
    In comaprison, even 802.11n supports up to 300mbps — but, generally, only if you’re using WPA2 with AES. Theoretically, 802.11ac offers theoretical maximum speeds of 3.46 Gbps under optimum (read: perfect) conditions.
    In other words, WPA and TKIP will slow a modern Wi-Fi network down. It’s not all about security!

  • Loss on connection speed

    Hi out there,
      I just purchased wireless router wrt54-gs and adapter wusb54gsc for my laptop.
    Installation went ok and got system up and running. When I first starting using
    system my signal strength was excellent and connection was at 54mpbs. Checked
    my download speeds with dsl reports at a consistant 2500-3000 mpbs. After using
    system for a while I noticed signal strength read good and connection fluctuated
    at 11mpbs and 5 mpbs, all of this happening with my laptop in the same position!!
    I rebooted the laptop numerous times and still the same slow connection speeds.
    After shutting system down ovenight in same physical location, rebooted and still
    have same slow connection.
    Any ideas????
    Thanks

    I can't help you, but I have the same situation. I have a speedbooster usb adapter hooked up to my desktop and haven't moved it a twitch, yet I get differing connect speeds and signal strength varies back and forth from low to very good. Only have one neighbor that I can see who is broadcasting a wireless signal. Just curious what is going on.
    Mark

  • WRT160N SLOW CONNECTION SPEED

    I have slow connect speed when using the WRT160N. I have tried every thing, done dianogstics on connection, router, modem, thru three diffeant software, norton, windows, system machinics. when ising the router some days the speed is amost like using dial up
    I use XP, on both a laptop desk top, up to date drivers, both cna use wifi or direct connection by cat 5e, 3 m of ram, a wimax internet server,,,,, (company called Bridge Maxx)
    But when I stop using the router and connect directly to the modem no problem works fine,,,,, not sure what to do........ just need my wifi back,,,,so i cna work,

    Whats the Version number of your Router, If you have having version2 router, then there is an knows issue with Version2 Router. Downgrading to Build 8 is generally accepted to correct these issues, however Linksys have indicated to several people they do not have the build 8 firmware to give to end users.
    This is ONLY for WRT160N V2 routers. This firmware will not work on WRT160N V1.
    You can find it at http://audipages.com/router/
    Follow the dowload and firmware downgrade instructions on that page.
    Once you upgrade the firmware of your router, you need to Reset your Router and Re-Configure all the settings on it back again. Once you do the settings on your router i think this should solve your problem. 

  • Just cannot get a good connection speed....

    Hi all,
    We changed our ISP from a steady 2MB connection with TalkTalk to a potential 8MB connection with BT about 2 and half weeks ago.
    The TalkTalk connection was sound.....It was stable and reliable and we never had any problems when accessing the internet, downloading files and using games consoles for online play.
    Then we got BT (My dads call, not mine...) and things have just hurtled downhill at a gargantuan rate.
    We were told of a 10 day stabalisation period, which I was willing to ride out, despite a horrible connection speed which made browsing, downloading and playing on my PS3 close to unbearable.
    We have contacted BT by phone numerous times to no avail, and our speed hasnt improved ONCE over the last 2 and half weeks we've had the connection active......I figured the 10 day stabalisation period would have improved gradually over that time, and not just suddenly kick in during the end of the 10 days.
    I've been using the Homehub 2.0, but the previous Router doesnt seem to work either (Netgear), so I;m assuming its the connection itself causing the problems......I'm 95% sure its nothing we can do about it.......I've personally tried everything and had no success whatsoever (tinkering with router settings, trying different routers etc.)
    The router stats are below.....According to a speed tester, our download speed is 0.13 and upload speed is 0.46 (obviously not what it should be!)
    Connection Information
    Line state
    Connected
    Connection time
    0 days, 03:03:18
    Downstream
    287 Kbps
    Upstream
    440 Kbps
    ADSL Settings
    VPI/VCI
    0/38
    Type
    PPPoA
    Modulation
    G.992.5 Annex A
    Latency type
    Interleaved
    Noise margin (Down/Up)
    9.8 dB / 25.7 dB
    Line attenuation (Down/Up)
    38.4 dB / 18.1 dB
    Output power (Down/Up)
    4.2 dBm / 1.3 dBm
    Loss of Framing (Local/Remote)
    0 / 0
    Loss of Signal (Local/Remote)
    0 / 0
    Loss of Power (Local/Remote)
    0 / 0
    FEC Errors (Down/Up)
    9482 / 0
    CRC Errors (Down/Up)
    0 / 0
    HEC Errors (Down/Up)
    7 / 0
    Error Seconds (Local/Remote)
    0 / 0
     Sorry its a bit drawn out, but I tried to be as detailed as possible.
    Thanks in advance.

    Thanks for the help mate, just gave the speed tester another bash and managed to get something back.....As predicted, results werent exactly brilliant....
    FAQ
    Test1 comprises of two tests
    1. Best Effort Test: -provides background information.
    Download Speed
    55 Kbps
    0 Kbps
    250 Kbps
    Max Achievable Speed
     Download speedachieved during the test was - 55 Kbps
     For your connection, the acceptable range of speedsis 100-250 Kbps.
     Additional Information:
     Your DSL Connection Rate :287 Kbps(DOWN-STREAM), 440 Kbps(UP-STREAM)
     IP Profile for your line is - 135 Kbps
    The throughput of Best Efforts (BE) classes achieved during the test is - 2.17:4.67:93.87 (SBE:NBEBE)
    These figures represent the ratio while sententiously passing Sub BE, Normal BE and Priority BE marked traffic.
    The results of this test will vary depending on the way your ISP has decided to use these traffic classes.
    2. Upstream Test: -provides background information.
    Upload Speed
    259 Kbps
    0 Kbps
    440 Kbps
    Max Achievable Speed
    >Upload speed achieved during the test was - 259 Kbps
     Additional Information:
     Upstream Rate IP profile on your line is - 440 Kbps
    This test was not conclusive and further testing is required.This might be useful for your ISP to investigate the fault.

Maybe you are looking for

  • How do I scan a document, and where does it appear once scanned?

    I have located the scan feature in System Preferences/Print&Scan and successfully scanned a document so it appeared in the preview pane. How do I find the scanned document?

  • DtaeFunction

    I have a simple tracking system that allows my customers to create records for their clients. each record has an open date and a close date. they are supposed to close out tix within 3 days, and they want a report to show all records that didn't clos

  • Why don't songs appear on iPod?

    I click and drag songs from itunes window into iPod window on my Mac. Then when I'm done and disconnect, they do NOT appear on the iPod, it's blank. Any ideas? I am running iTunes 7, Mac 10.3.9, with a brand new iPod, purchased Oct 11, 2006. Heeeeeee

  • How: Migrate from Multiple Context to Single

    Hi all, Wonder if anyone has experience of this and can give some advice/tips. I have a Failover pair of ASA5550's running ASDM 6.2(5) and ASA 8.2(2).  Originally they were setup with 2 context's and an admin context but one of the contexts has now b

  • When using FaceTime on my iMac, the other party cannot hear me but i can hear them

    Recently (today) while using facetime on my IMAC, the other oarty was unable to hear me though I could hear them, (the mute button was/is not on) we determined it was on my end as I had no problem facetime using my ipad, I would appreciate any help.