RLM - Error at MIGO (Cross Dock) for supply process Stock / Non Stock

Hello Friends!
I am experiencing a strange error at time of MIGO for a RLM Stock / Non Stock supply process. I believe it could be due to RLM's effort in creating a (Cross Dock) Delivery in the background.
Error details: 'Enter a material or an item category' -- Message no. VL383
Please help!. Thanks!

Hello Friends!
I am experiencing a strange error at time of MIGO for a RLM Stock / Non Stock supply process. I believe it could be due to RLM's effort in creating a (Cross Dock) Delivery in the background.
Error details: 'Enter a material or an item category' -- Message no. VL383
Please help!. Thanks!

Similar Messages

  • Cross Docking for stock category Q (inspection stock)

    Hello everyone,
    My client uses cross docking in 4.7 release and recently a requirement came up where they wanna be able to cross dock stock received from production while the User Decision from QM is still pending.
    I have tried to walkthrough the code behind planned/opp cross docking and realised that only available stock is taken into consideration.
    I d be really grateful if anyone could suggest how to best approach and tackle this issue? Please consider that the quant should not lose the inspection lot number so that once UD is given, the stock category changes automatically.
    Thank you
    Kind Regards

    Yes it is possible. In the IM/WM interface tables, in the second table, you can vary the process according to stock status. See the third column.
    LogisticsExecution \ Warehouse Management \ Interfaces \ Inventory Management \ Define Movement Type
    Following is the config. help text for the field
    Special Stock Indicators for Whse Mgmt
    Use
    In the Materials Management system you can post different transactions using one movement type.  For example, posting goods receipt to unallocated stock or goods receipt to
    stock in quality inspection.
    These transactions are treated differently by the system on the basis of this indicator.  Together with other indicators of a movement type in the Materials Management system, this indicator is used to correctly allocate a movement type in the Warehouse Management system so that the transaction can be posted accordingly.
    Regards,
    Nick

  • Error:-No delivery type defined for supplying plant and document type RB

    Hi,
    Here issue is such that while creating purchase order(Return order type)the error coming as follows.                      
    "No delivery type defined for supplying plant and document type RB"
    Scenario:-There are some damaged goods which are coming from france vendor to ukrain customer,now ukrain customer wish to send back the damaged goods to france.
    Looking forward:-1>Can anyone please let me know if there is an any customizing setting required if yes then how to maintain(navigation).
                             2>Is it something like practically it is not possible as goods are dispatched back to the country from where it is coming.
    Thanks for your help !!!
    Dharmesh

    Hi Naveen,
    Thanks for the information !!!
    Futher while creating PO i am getting an error message as purchase org. not responsile for plant how to solve this error can you plz let me know.
    Regards,
    Dharmesh

  • Error in MIGO in STO for capturing excise

    Dear All,
    I need clarification for the process of STO in regards to Excise transaction
    we are doing STO as below process
    1) STO PO ME21N-> DELIVERY AND GOODS ISSUE VL10B(MOV TYPE 641 -> AND BILLING VF01 -> EXCISE INVOICE J1IIN -> GRN FOR OUTBOUND DELIVERY
    i just need to know the above process is correct or not coz this is we are doing for inter plant STO within same company.
    or we need to follow the process as below
    2) STO PO ME21N -> GOODS ISSUE WITH MOV TYPE 351 - >EXCISE INVOICE J1IS -> GRN MIGO AND CAPTURE EXCISE.
    Pl suggest,
    Vimlesh

    Hi,
    If your transaction involves Freight transfer/CST/VAT transfer you will have to rely on SD route for STO i.e. with Delivery.
    However if only excise transfer is the concern without any freight or other teaxes you can adopt the MM route that is the 351 doc ->J1IS route.
    hope it helps.

  • Error while uploading pdf document for GP process  .

    Hi,
    I had developed a pdf form in Adobe designer and i'am tring to upload that file into Portal for GP process.But it is giving me an error as "<b>Could not retrieve template fields: Wrong document format or adapter mismatch from adapter</b>"
    Kindly help me in this issue.
    with regards
    Pradeep.B

    Deepak,
    Can you indicate the exact version of Adobe LiveCycle that is being used? Also, please let me know which application server, database and MS Office versions are being used.
    Also, please delete (or achive) your existing application server log files, and restart your application server. Then repeat the steps that lead to this error.
    Finally, please post the application server log files.

  • Error in actual template allocation for Business Process

    Gurus,
    I am facing a strange problem in actual template allocation for business process (T-code: CPAS). When I am doing a test run, the system gives the result with a message "Processing completed with no errors", However when I have unchecked the test run and ran the allocation, system shows me the result, however no posting takes place. The message I am getting is:
    "Data not updated due to errors". The details of this error message are:
    No information was found
    Message no. GU444
    Diagnosis
    The system could not find the necessary information.
    I am absolutely clueless and have no idea where things have gone wrong. I have maintained the activity and cost center properly. The template I am using is also ok.
      Request your help on this. Any suggestion would be highly appreciated.
    Thanks in advance!
    Snigdho.

    Hi ,
    With such kind of error " "Data not updated due to errors". " its very difficult so determine the exact cause of the issue .
    Did your selection parameters in CPAS has a tick on detailed list . Please tick the detailed list icon and run KPAS again and let me know if you are getting more detailed error from SAP.
    Regards
    Sarada

  • Can I use the ipad keyboard Dock for pairing with a non Apple laptop?

    I am thinking of getting the keyboard dock for my IPad 2.
    I also have an IBM laptop with blutooth. Can I use the iPad dock as a keyboard for the IBM?
    Thanks

    Tremolo Arm wrote:
    I am thinking of getting the keyboard dock for my IPad 2.
    I also have an IBM laptop with blutooth. Can I use the iPad dock as a keyboard for the IBM?
    Thanks
    If you're referring to this dock:
    http://store.apple.com/us/product/MC533LL/B?fnode=MTc0MjU4NjE&mco=MTg1ODE1Mjc
    it is not a Bluetooth keyboard so can't be used with the laptop.  And the keyboard dock was originally designed for the curved back of the iPad1.  So while it does appear to work with the iPad2, some people report that it's a little loose and sometimes get intermittent disconnections with the connector.
    As for Bluetooth keyboards, some can only be paired to one device.  To use with two computers, you may have to un-pair from the first device, the re-pair to the second device.  Some keyboards can "switch" without un-pairing, but you have to research to ensure the model you want will do that.  Depending on your usage, it may be more worthwhile to get separate keyboards.

  • Schedule line confirmation date for 3rd party sales( non stock item)

    Hi ,
    While creating an sales order i have a stock  item and 4 non stock items . All the non stok items are similar to 3rd party sales as they are services . While created the sales order for the no stock item the confirmed schedule date is given as 12 days in the future or in one case after month .
    Can  someone please help me in understanding how the dates are being calculated . I havent created any PO for the non stock items.
    I would like the confirmed date to be picked as the system date.

    Hi,
    There can be multiple reasons for this.
    You have not mentioned the material type. Anyhow, first check Material Master 
    Purchasing view> GR Processing Time field
    Sales / general Plant > Set up time and processing time field
    If MRP views are maintained
    In MRP2 View > Scheduling.
    In case you do not want availability check to be carried out
    Untick Availbility check and TOR check boxes in VOV6 for the schedule lines determined for these materials.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Sharan

  • Error in Migo: Account determination for entry NCSA KDM not possible

    We did not setup the account for KDM as we fixed the exchange rate at PO. Did not expect such error when perform GR for foreign currency PO. This happened in our production environment.
    In the developement environment, did not encountered such problem.
    Would appreciate if anyone had encounter the same issue enlighten us where went wrong.
    Regards,
    Peck Har

    Hi,
    Yes, the data entry (PO) is correct. And compare the valuation setting in IMG of developement environment seem alright. Not sure what's else to check.
    Regards,
    Peck Har

  • Error in MIGO while doing Intra-company plant to depot stock transfer by ST

    Dear gurus,
    I am facing an error while posting MIGO during intra-company plant to plant STO.
    Settings for STO:
    SPRO >IMG > MM >Purchasing > Purchase Order>set up Stock Transport Order
    Define Shipping Data
    Define/assign Checking rule
    Assign Delivery Type
    Assign Doc type
    I have maintained the following pre-requisite master data
    1. Supplying/Receiving plants are created as customer/vendor master
    2. Excise details (customer/Vendor/Plant) data are maintained in J1ID
    3. Assessable value is entered in J1ID
    Process flow:
    1. ME21n - Create STO (PO type:UB)
    2. VL10B - Create Outbound Delivery
    3. VL02N - PGI
    4. VF01 - Create Pro-forma Invoice (Stock Transfer Invoice)
    5. J1IIN - Post Excise Invoice
    at the receiving Plant
    6. MIGO-Post Goods Receipt.
    After entering the excise invoice and clicking on CHECK button in MIGO, the following errors are appearing
    1. Excise Details are not maintained for Vendor .-Message no. 8I565
    2. Maintain Vendor for the excise invoice -Message no. 4F185
    3. Please check excise base for the item is zero ! -Message no. 4F121
    Please reply your valuable suggestions.
    Regards,
    Anbu

    Please dont post the same question in multiple forums.  Continue in one thread
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • How to display custom error message in Job log for batch processing

    Hi All,
    I am rexecuting one R/3 report in batch mode and i want to display all the custom error i have handled in job log when its executed from SM36,SM37. The custom error are like 'Delovery/Shipmet doe not exits' or others which we can display in online mode like message e100(ZFI) or any other way and accordingly we can handle the program control like come out of the program ro leave to transaction'Zxxx' or anything. But i want my program to be executed completely and accumulate all the error in job log of batch processing.
    Can anyone tell me how can i do so...
    Thanks,
    Amrita

    Hi,
    Thats what i have done from the begining. I have written message like this:
    Message i100(ZFI).
    I was hoping to see this message in the log. But i cant see. Can you help me pleae...

  • Error creating web service proxy for bpel process in jdev 10.1.3

    Hi,
    I am trying to create a web service proxy in Jdeveloper 10.1.3, and get the following error:
    Element type "fault" is missing required attribute "name"
    I have created a fault on one of the operations, and in the .wsdl file there is a name attribute:
    <operation name="process">
    <fault name="TestError" message="client:TestErrorMessage"/>
    </operation>
    The fault definition in the .wsdl obtained from the process when you access it over http is somewhat different:
    <fault>
    <soap:fault name="TestError" use="literal" encodingStyle="" />
    </fault>
    Any ideas how to workaround this problem?
    Toby

    Hi Susan,
    The WSDL generated by BPEL designer is :
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <definitions name="EncryptedPasswordTest"
    targetNamespace="http://xmlns.oracle.com/EncryptedPasswordTest"
    xmlns="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/"
    xmlns:client="http://xmlns.oracle.com/EncryptedPasswordTest"
    xmlns:plnk="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2003/05/partner-link/">
         <!-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         TYPE DEFINITION - List of services participating in this BPEL process
         The default output of the BPEL designer uses strings as input and
         output to the BPEL Process. But you can define or import any XML
         Schema type and us them as part of the message types.
         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -->
         <types>
              <schema attributeFormDefault="qualified"
                   elementFormDefault="qualified"
                   targetNamespace="http://xmlns.oracle.com/EncryptedPasswordTest"
                   xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
                   <element name="EncryptedPasswordTestProcessRequest">
                        <complexType>
                             <sequence>
                                  <element name="username" type="string"/>
                             </sequence>
                        </complexType>
                   </element>
                   <element name="EncryptedPasswordTestProcessResponse">
                        <complexType>
                             <sequence>
                                  <element name="password" type="string"/>
                             </sequence>
                        </complexType>
                   </element>
                   <element name="EncryptedPasswordTestProcessError">
                        <complexType>
                             <sequence>
                                  <element name="code" type="string"/>
                                  <element name="description" type="string"/>
                             </sequence>
                        </complexType>
                   </element>
              </schema>
         </types>
         <!-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         MESSAGE TYPE DEFINITION - Definition of the message types used as
         part of the port type defintions
         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -->
         <message name="EncryptedPasswordTestRequestMessage">
              <part name="payload" element="client:EncryptedPasswordTestProcessRequest"/>
         </message>
         <message name="EncryptedPasswordTestResponseMessage">
              <part name="payload" element="client:EncryptedPasswordTestProcessResponse"/>
         </message>
         <message name="EncryptedPasswordTestErrorMessage">
              <part name="payload" element="client:EncryptedPasswordTestProcessError"/>
         </message>
         <!-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         PORT TYPE DEFINITION - A port type groups a set of operations into
         a logical service unit.
         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -->
         <!-- portType implemented by the EncryptedPasswordTest BPEL process -->
         <portType name="EncryptedPasswordTest">
              <operation name="process">
                   <input message="client:EncryptedPasswordTestRequestMessage" />
                   <output message="client:EncryptedPasswordTestResponseMessage"/>
    <fault name="EncryptedPasswordTestError" message="client:EncryptedPasswordTestErrorMessage"/>
              </operation>
         </portType>
         <!-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         PARTNER LINK TYPE DEFINITION
         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -->
         <plnk:partnerLinkType name="EncryptedPasswordTest">
              <plnk:role name="EncryptedPasswordTestProvider">
                   <plnk:portType name="client:EncryptedPasswordTest"/>
              </plnk:role>
         </plnk:partnerLinkType>
    </definitions>
    And the WSDL produced when you access the ws endpoint is:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <definitions
    name="EncryptedPasswordTest"
    targetNamespace="http://xmlns.oracle.com/EncryptedPasswordTest"
    xmlns="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/"
    xmlns:tns="http://xmlns.oracle.com/EncryptedPasswordTest"
    xmlns:plnk="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2003/05/partner-link/"
    xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/"
    xmlns:client="http://xmlns.oracle.com/EncryptedPasswordTest"
    >
    <types>
    <schema attributeFormDefault="qualified" elementFormDefault="qualified" targetNamespace="http://xmlns.oracle.com/EncryptedPasswordTest"
    xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
    <element name="EncryptedPasswordTestProcessRequest">
    <complexType>
    <sequence>
    <element name="username" type="string"/>
    </sequence>
    </complexType>
    </element>
    <element name="EncryptedPasswordTestProcessResponse">
    <complexType>
    <sequence>
    <element name="password" type="string"/>
    </sequence>
    </complexType>
    </element>
    <element name="EncryptedPasswordTestProcessError">
    <complexType>
    <sequence>
    <element name="code" type="string"/>
    <element name="description" type="string"/>
    </sequence>
    </complexType>
    </element>
    </schema>
    </types>
    <message name="EncryptedPasswordTestErrorMessage">
    <part name="payload" element="tns:EncryptedPasswordTestProcessError"/>
    </message>
    <message name="EncryptedPasswordTestResponseMessage">
    <part name="payload" element="tns:EncryptedPasswordTestProcessResponse"/>
    </message>
    <message name="EncryptedPasswordTestRequestMessage">
    <part name="payload" element="tns:EncryptedPasswordTestProcessRequest"/>
    </message>
    <portType name="EncryptedPasswordTest">
    <operation name="process">
    <input message="tns:EncryptedPasswordTestRequestMessage"/>
    <output message="tns:EncryptedPasswordTestResponseMessage"/>
    <fault name="EncryptedPasswordTestError" message="tns:EncryptedPasswordTestErrorMessage"/>
    </operation>
    </portType>
    <binding name="EncryptedPasswordTestBinding" type="tns:EncryptedPasswordTest">
    <soap:binding style="document" transport="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http"/>
    <operation name="process">
    <soap:operation style="document" soapAction="process"/>
    <input>
    <soap:body use="literal"/>
    </input>
    <output>
    <soap:body use="literal"/>
    </output>
    <fault>
    <soap:fault name="EncryptedPasswordTestError" use="literal" encodingStyle=""/>
    </fault>
    </operation>
    </binding>
    <service name="EncryptedPasswordTest">
    <port name="EncryptedPasswordTestPort" binding="tns:EncryptedPasswordTestBinding">
    <soap:address location="http://bpel5.lon.domroot.com:7779/orabpel/default/EncryptedPasswordTest/1.0"/>
    </port>
    </service>
    <plnk:partnerLinkType name="EncryptedPasswordTest">
    <plnk:role name="EncryptedPasswordTestProvider">
    <plnk:portType name="tns:EncryptedPasswordTest"/>
    </plnk:role>
    </plnk:partnerLinkType>
    </definitions>

  • Error while setting input parameter for dynamic process - GP

    Hi All,
    I am using CAF 7.1 GP.
    Here I have to start a process dynamically and it is working fine.
    But, when I tried to set value for input parameter of this process by
    IGPStructure params = GPStructureFactory.getStructure(process.getInputParameters());
    params.setAttributeValue("Val","MyValue");
    ( <b>Val</b> is the name of grouped input parameter ), it is giving
    com.sap.caf.eu.gp.exception.api.GPInvocationException: Structure with name input and namespace http://wwww.sap.com/nw/eup/gp does not have an attribute with name Val and namespace null.
    But no where I have mentioned http://wwww.sap.com/nw/eup/gp.
    I dont have any structures in my input and output.
    Here is my full code
           try
                IGPProcess process = null;
                IUser tl_user =UMFactory.getUserFactory().getUserByLogonID("fahad");
                     IGPUserContext userContext = GPContextFactory.getContextManager().createUserContext(tl_user);//, user.getLocale());
                     process =GPProcessFactory.getDesigntimeManager().getActiveTemplate("F5D76840A56F11DC983B001966243CAD",userContext);
                     wdComponentAPI.getMessageManager().reportSuccess("Title of process is "+process.getTitle());
                     IGPRuntimeManager rtm = GPProcessFactory.getRuntimeManager();
                     IGPProcessRoleInstanceList roles = rtm.createProcessRoleInstanceList();
                     int rolenum = process.getRoleInfoCount();
                     wdComponentAPI.getMessageManager().reportSuccess("Number is "+rolenum);
                     IGPProcessRoleInstance roleInstance=null;
                     IUser ho_User=null;
                     for (int i = 0; i < rolenum; i++)
                             wdComponentAPI.getMessageManager().reportWarning("Role Text is "process.getRoleInfo(i).getText()"  Role Name is "+process.getRoleInfo(i).getRoleName());
                             if(i==1)
                                  ho_User = UMFactory.getUserFactory().getUserByLogonID("poornendu");
                                  roleInstance = roles. createProcessRoleInstance(process.getRoleInfo(i).getRoleName());
                                  roleInstance.addRuntimeDefinedUser(ho_User);
                                  roles.addProcessRoleInstance(roleInstance);
                             if(i==2)
                                  ho_User = UMFactory.getUserFactory().getUserByLogonID("fahad");
                                  roleInstance = roles. createProcessRoleInstance(process.getRoleInfo(i).getRoleName());
                                  roleInstance.addUser(ho_User);
                                  roles.addProcessRoleInstance(roleInstance);
                     wdComponentAPI.getMessageManager().reportSuccess(""+process.getStructure().getItemCount());
                     IGPStructure params = GPStructureFactory.getStructure(process.getInputParameters());
                     wdComponentAPI.getMessageManager().reportSuccess("Title of process is "+process.getTitle());
                     <b>params.setAttributeValue("Val","MyValue");</b>                     
                     String pName=wdContext.currentContextElement().getProcessName();
                     IGPProcessInstance prInstance = rtm.startProcess(process,pName,"This process has been started using the GP public API",tl_user,roles,params,tl_user);
           catch(Exception e)
                wdComponentAPI.getMessageManager().reportException(""+e);
    Can anyone help me on this.
    Thanks,
    Fahad Hamsa

    Hi Experts,
    I solved it myself.
    The problem was, I have to make the input parameter as exposed. Thats all
    Anyway, thanks for the support.
    Regards,
    Fahad Hamsa

  • Opportunistic Cross-Docking and Transfer Requirements

    Hi all,
    I'm trying to set up opportunistic cross-docking sent sent GR stock directly to the production supply areas when there is a shortage of inventory in the warehouse.
    The PSAs are replenished with a manual KANBAN call which generates a TR with 350 mvt type.
    I'm struggling to ge this to work, and when I read the SAP Help on opportunistic cross docking the process flow keeps discussing that the system searches for relevant TOs, not TRs...... but then I know you can do planned cross-docking for GR to TR - I've set this up before.
    Has anyone done the same and might have tips for me?
    Regards,
    Mark.

    Hi Mark,
    I am also looking for a solution / guidline of this scenario.
    Could you please tell me if you have implemented this in the meanwhile?
    Thank you! Regards
    Uwe

  • Cross Docking with LE-WM - or - Reactivating Back Orders upon Goods Receipt

    I have been reviewing the documentation for Opportunistic and Planned Cross Docking in LE-WM. The requirement is to release Back Orders upon receipt of a shipment to avoid putting them away and picking them right away from the bin. We want to release the Back Orders for picking in the GR area at the time of receipt.
    So far it appears that Opportunistic Cross Docking depends on a Transfer Order already existing. The system then cancels the existing TO and replaces it with a TO to pick from the receipt Storage Type.
    Planned Cross Docking appears to require an existing Outbound Delivery to the expected Inbound Delivery.
    In the case of a Back Order, no Outbound Delivery or Transfer Order exist since there is no stock to release until the goods are received.
    Is there a way to release Back Orders to be picked directly from Goods Receipt?
    Thanks;
    Jim

    The problem is that all the information I found so far about it is over the process of external goods coming and sending they out without the need of storing in the warehouse. They go directly to the picking area (one step) or in two step process  going first from 902 (Good receive from external) to Cross docking Sorage type.and another movement  from Cross Docking Storage type to 916 Good issue Storage type.
    I need to know if it is possible to implement a solution of Cross Docking for certain number of products having a factory and a warehouse. If so, would you give me a brief process flow?.
    Thank You very much.
    Al
    Edited by: agmogena on Aug 22, 2011 12:01 PM

Maybe you are looking for