RM06EV47 Vs RM06EV70

Hi,
In our SAP system, in transaction AOBJ, archiving object MM_EKKO has Write program as RM06EW70 and Delete program as RM06ED70. But Preprocessing program maintained is still old RM06EV47 in the transaction AOBJ. My question is - should i change this program to RM06EV70 in transaction AOBJ. If yes, then how? I mean should i simply change the program name in AOBJ in Development system and transport to Production? Or are there any more settings to be done?
Thanks and Regards,
Anuj

see KBA 1646578 - Preprocessing program is RM06EV47 though write / delete program is RM06EW70 / RM06ED70

Similar Messages

  • Delivery completed indicator for STO cannot be set!

    Dear colleagues,
    There are number of STO’s those goods issue quantity > quantity of goods received. Because of this delivery completed indicator cannot be set due to message “06 848 - Delivery completed indicator cannot be set for item XXXXX”.
    There is an OSS note (167795) that allows to set delivery completed indicator for such purchase orders. Even though our SAP release is 6.04, report RM06EV70 does not exist (yet BADI ME_ARCHIVE_ACTIVE is active) in the system and OSS note cannot be implemented.
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Regards,
    Melih
    PS. Please do not provide answers like “the goods receipt must be first posted via the entire goods issue quantity; then you can post a scrapping via the shortfall quantity” since there are backdated STO’s.

    Hi,
    Find STO created for which plant in t.code:ME23N and check MRP parameter maintained for that plant in t.code:OPPQ( also check entry of that plant in t.code: OMCD).
    Also cross check which Field Selection Key assigned to your STO PO document type and check “Delivery completed" indicator” available as Optional entry in GR/IR control segment in your Field Selection Key.
    SPRO - > MM - > Purchasing -> Define Screen Layout at Document Level
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • PO archiving

    My settings in config are Residence time 1 is 730 and residence time 2 is 365
    This means if there is no change in PO for 730 days then deletion indicator will be set.
    Then after 365 days , the PO will be deleted from the data base.
    1. I guess for residence time 2 period, we will not be able to do any changes in PO, is this correct?
       If yes, then why residence time2 is there?
    2. I manually deleted a PO line item. In next archival run (runs every month) this PO is marked as eligible for archival.Means I am not able to do any changes in this PO.
    Where I can find the settings for this?
    Please advice.

    a deletion indicator set manually or via the preproc program in archiving does not restrict the user from doing any changes.
    Please read OSS Note 948493 - Residence time in new reports RM06EV47, RM06BV47
    here SAP explains how the preproc and the write program interact with the residence time.

  • MM_EKKO Archiving - PO deactivated

    Hello all,
    In R/3 4.6C i made a test run for MM_EKKO archiving object, the spool result differenciate between PO archived and deactivated. Could you please explain me the difference?
    One more question, the test run shouldn't se the indicator for deletion, is it correct? it seems that in my test run the system modified all PO insered into archiving selection.
    Thank you for collaboration.
    Fuffo

    Deactivated means that you have executed a 2-step archiving.
    You have different residence times. SAP set the deletion flag if residence time one is met, but residence time 2 not yet.
    If both times are met, the PO gets archived.
    for examples see OSS note 948493 - Residence time in new reports RM06EV47, RM06BV47
    You probably have customized the test variant for MM_EKKO as production variant, other wise SAP would not have updated your database.

  • Scheduling Agreement flagged for deletion

    Hi
    Once a scheduling agreement has been archived it is no longer visible from transaction ME33L, but can be viewed with Read program RM06ER30.
    When a scheduling agreement was flagged for deletion with the Pre-Processing program RM06EV47 it has not been archived yet, although a message stipulates that it has. ME33L is possible, but ME32L is not allowed.
    The particular scheduling agreement in question was flagged because it complied to the residence time configurations BUT business now want s it back (even though the lack of maintenance on their side caused the document to be flagged for deletion)
    How do we 'unflag' a scheduling agreement and take it back to its original state where it can be changed again?
    Your help will be appreciated
    Thanks

    Hi Jurgen
    I am waiting for authorization on MEMASSPO.
    In the interim, I noticed that field  LOEKZ contains the value L.
    I further notice that MEMASSPO is mass maintenance for Purchase Orders. Will I be able to only select one scheduling agreement to unflag?
    And lastly I noticed on our Dev environment that there are no variants created in the system. Where will I do this from?
    Thank you

  • How to close Purchase Order and mark to deletion flag.??

    Hi,
    We need to close all Open POs(For archiving, some old data) through a report.
    Considering .....
                       1. PO-GR-IR
    and              2. STO-Outboundelivery-PGI-IBD-PGR
    Checked few threads, though useful but still more information required.
    -> Preprocessing program for archiving standard object MM_EKKO 'RM06EV47' is  helpful.
    -> Example we have four POs p1,p2,p3 and p4.
    P1,p2 has deletion flag as 'L' so will be filtered out with
      SELECT ebeln    FROM  ekko INTO TABLE lt_sekko           
        WHERE ebeln  IN er_ebeln
          AND ekorg  IN er_ekorg
          AND bstyp  IN er_bstyp
          AND bedat  IN er_bedat
          AND bsart  IN er_bsart
          AND ekgrp  IN er_ekgrp
          AND loekz <> 'L'
          ORDER BY EBELN.
    For P3 has GR .
    P4 has to be marked for deletion flag.
    Regards
    Mohinder Singh

    Hi Thanks for the reply. I checked with that bapi too. I used  some part of standard code and then manipulated. Will shorty paste the code on to SDN as its general one and may be used by others.It still under testing.
    Edited by: Mohinder Singh Chauhan on Feb 20, 2009 4:07 AM

  • Archiving PO older MM_EKKO (purchase order)

    Hello,
    I need archiving PO older (more than 10 years old), but this PO when execute preprocessing program RM06EV47 and most of them can not be marked for deletion, for many reasons.  Eg. e06(115)  "Quantity delivered differs from qty. invoiced (Function not possible)" and other messages
    I already tested with
    Program: RWPOB001 (Transaction WPO1)
    BADI: ARC_MM_EKKO_CHECK
    But I can not mark it for deletion (prerequisite for archivign PO).
    Is there a standard way to close that  inconistentes Purchase order ?
    I want to avoid
    UPDATE EKKO-LOEKZ = 'L'.
    Thanks
    Edited by: Cervantes Nicolas on Oct 4, 2010 5:58 PM

    Cervantes Nicolas wrote:
    I need archiving PO older (more than 10 years old), but this PO when execute preprocessing program RM06EV47 and most of them can not be marked for deletion, for many reasons.  Eg. e06(115)  "Quantity delivered differs from qty. invoiced (Function not possible)" and other messages
    If your PO shows E06(115), use transaction MASS, BUS2012 to flag both: EKPO-ELIKZ ("Delivery Completed" Indicator) and EKPO-EREKZ (Final invoice indicator). This should let the PO pass - I was in the same situation and finally managed to get rid of 98% of inconsistent PO's.
    In addition: search in OSS for notes on the subject, especially with keyword RM06EV47 - there are a couple of notes explaining what to do to pass the prepare-run.

  • Archiving MM_EKKO

    We have started archiving mm_ekko obbject . Situation which i am facing is that when i ran write job to archive few month of data i was able to archive majority of that data but for some purchase document i get this message "Change date of purchasing doc. item within retention period".
    I have checked the config for all the doc type and we have specified residence time 1 and 2.
    Also when i check these document in ME23N i get a message displayed that "Document is archived" but i don't see any archive file created for these document which i can delete and store in the archive server. Now when the user pull up the information for these document it still coming from SAP DB .
    Can some please provide the config information which i need to change for such document . The delivery date which is mention on these document are in the range of date for which i am archiving.
    Please provide some information on how i can archive such document
    Thanks

    Dear Andy,
    Thats really weird.
    What is the release you are using??
    In Standard SAP, You have different residence times.
    SAP set the deletion flag if residence time one is met, but residence time 2 not yet.
    If both times are met, the PO gets archived.
    for examples see OSS note 948493 - Residence time in new reports RM06EV47, RM06BV47 .
    And if you are using 4.6c Version, then OSS note 588463 .
    A document item gets deactivated (deletion indicator) if you have more than one items in a document, but not all fulfill the archiving criteria, then the once that fulfill the criteria get deactivated, the other remain untouched. But the document gets only archived if all items are deactivated.
    Please check and let us know.
    THanks
    Murtuza

  • How to manually delete Po at header level ?

    Hi,
    I can delete PO line items in my ECC60 system
    However, i would like to delete PO at header level.
    In EKKO , i can see the deletion flag in LOEKZ field.
    BUT in ME22N, i cannot find any button to delete PO at header level...
    Could somebody clarify the PO deletion at header level and the LOEKZ deletion flag in EKKO ?
    Kind regards,
    Yann

    Yann,
    To my knowledge you cannot directly delete PO from the system. You need to follow the archiving steps...
    1. Program: RM06EV47 - For setting Deletion Indicator
    2.  Program: RM06EW47 - For archiving the document.
    3. Program: RM06ED47 - For Deletion from the system.
    If you need further details you can go through this link <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/8d/3e4b63462a11d189000000e8323d3a/frameset.htm">Archiving Purchase documents</a>
    Hope this helps....Reward your points and close the thread if so,
    Regards,
    Prasobh

  • Purchase Order deleted by mistake

    Hi all,
    We have a purchase order that was deleted by accident.  We we wanted to remove one of the line items and it set the whole purchse order for deletion.  Is there a way to undelete a purchase order?  Thanks all for your help and let me know if I need to clarify anything.
    Regards,
    Victor Lam

    I am not sure how it initially happened.  I was able to recreate it in our test client.  I created a purchase order and deleted the line item.  I then ran program RM06EV47 to set the deletion flag for the PO.  We are trying to reverse it.  SAP Support recommended writing a program to reverse this, but we were looking for way to do it with out making a new program.

  • Archiving: adding more selection criterias for MM_EKKO

    Is there a possibility for adding new selection criterias for object MM_EKKO? Any exits for Release 4.6c?

    Deactivated means that you have executed a 2-step archiving.
    You have different residence times. SAP set the deletion flag if residence time one is met, but residence time 2 not yet.
    If both times are met, the PO gets archived.
    for examples see OSS note 948493 - Residence time in new reports RM06EV47, RM06BV47
    You probably have customized the test variant for MM_EKKO as production variant, other wise SAP would not have updated your database.

  • How to delete Purchase Order?

    Any T.code is there to delete PO? or just we need to delete the line items individually in the PO?
    pls share with me
    TIA
    KOgi

    Hi,
    You cannot directly delete PO from the system. You need to follow the archiving steps...
    1. Program: RM06EV47 - For setting Deletion Indicator
    2. Program: RM06EW47 - For archiving the document.
    3. Program: RM06ED47 - For Deletion from the system.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/8d/3e4b63462a11d189000000e8323d3a/frameset.htm
    Regards,
    Naveen.

  • Archive PO associated with Maintenance Order

    We have maintenance orders back to 2004 that have never been closed or had the delete flag set.  We would like to get these cleaned up.  Many of them have purchase orders attached to them.
    I ran MEMASSPO to set the final invoice indicator on the purchase orders that were hanging out there but when I tried to then close the orders and set the deletion flag I couldn't.  I would get an error that the PO still existed.  With production orders I would run RM06EV47 to set the delete flag on the PO then I would be able to close the production order.  This doesn't seem to be the case with maintenance orders.
    When I run RM06EV47 on the purchase orders that are associated with maintenance orders I get the message "Archive Run only flags Production Order POs. See BADI."
    I haven't been able to find anything regarding how to set the delete flag on these POs.  Can someone tell me what the process is?
    Thanks much,
    Andrea

    There is no relation between archiving PM Order & PO existence.
    When you make TECO & Business Completion of those orders, corresponding PR will get deletion flag.
    You can run SARA for Purchase Order as well as Maintenance Order archival which will set Deletion flag as well as archive those documents.
    Archive Purchase Orders
    Archiving Object for PO - MM_EKKO
    Archiving Object for Maintenance Order - PM_ORDER

  • Deletion flag

    In the purchase order system is allowing for assigning a deletion flag for line item even having subsequent transactions like GR and IV.
      I don't want to allow for deletion flag for above said scenario.
    plz suggest.

    there is certainly no standard customizing for this.
    I understand that you are not archiving right now, but maybe in 5 years. Consider this. When developing the userexit, condition the program,  so that manual maintenance will be restricted but setting of deletion indicator thru RM06EV47 not.

  • Table EKKO-LOEKZ Delete Indicator can't be changed once set

    Hi Gurus:
    We ran Archive Object MM_EKKO Preprocessing Program RM06EV70.  This set the deletion indicator EKKO-LOEKZ to an 'L' on 2008 Purchase Orders.  It was discovered that around 100 really can't be archived.   On this Forum we were told that SAP Tcode MEMASSPO can change LOEKZ back to blank.  Our SCM Team tried that but we get  error messages that the PO can't be changed and  that Purchasing document 6200000617 already archived.  
    Does anyone know what we are doing wrong or another way to set LOEKZ back to blank?
    Thank you
    Dennis

    Hi Jurgen:
    I use Tcode MEMASSPO.
    I select fields on Purchase Order Header.  I select the deletion indicator MASSEKKO-LOEKZ on the list.
    I enter a PO Number with an 'L' in the LOEKZ field from the preprocessor.
    I change the new value field to  blank on the PO Header.  I hit the mass change button.   The 'L' is changed to a  blank. 
    I hit the save icon.   I get all of the following errors.
    6200000617 : Instance 6200000617 of object type PurchaseOrder could not be changed
    6200000617 : Instance 6200000617 of object type PurchaseOrder could not be changed
    6200000617 : Purchasing document 6200000617 already archived.
    If we do this for a PO that was not set to a 'L' by the preproessor program.  We can change it to using MEMASSPO to 'L' (SAP Changes it to 'C' and we can blank it out again. 
    I don't think there is anyway to get MEMASSPO to change the PO.  Any ideas?

Maybe you are looking for

  • Mail 4.5 Message Encryption Does Not Work per Articles

    Apple's various articles and help files on how to send encrypted mail do not work for my currently installed Mail 4.5 on my 10.6.8 OS; "An Encrypt (closed lock) icon appears next to the Signed icon if you have a personal certificate for a recipient i

  • SPNego - Windows integrated Single-Sign On not working - How to debug?

    Dear board, I've tried to configure SPNego - Windows Integrated SSO with no sucess yet. We do use SAP EP7 on Windows Server 2003 64bit with MS AD 2003. The following is done: - Service Account is created, authentication works when done on pupose - SP

  • ERROR IN OUTPUT WITH  CONDITIONS IN SMARTFORM

    I have   two conditions in smartform. if i_final-konrth NE g_temp9.    i_final-ssign eq g_temp10. then we need to print text1 in the output. There are no program lines in the  text. g_temp9 and g_temp10 are passed from the program. text1 is not getti

  • Photoshop Elements 'Photo Mail' feature

    I recently received an email created with Photoshop Elements 'Photo Mail' feature The presentation of the photos was very attractive. I have CS4 which does not include Photo Mail. Anyone have a suggestion as to how Photo Mail can be duplicated in CS4

  • What is an alternate apple ID used for?

    I noticed in "manage my apple ID" website that I now have an alternate apple ID, its my @me.com email address that I got when activating iCloud way back.  So, it says I can use it in place of my primary apple ID for purchases on iTunes and the App St